User talk:Tagenar

From WikiFur, the furry encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

Hi there, Tagenar, and welcome to WikiFur! Thank you for your recent contribution to the discussion of Kaze: Ghost Warrior. Let me know if you need any help not already provided. :-) --GreenReaper(talk) 02:23, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Possible description for outsiders...or something?[edit]

Hi, Green. If you could, please read this little piece I wrote (almost unintentionally) on my user page.

User:Tagenar, the Guide section. It's a sendup of Douglas Adams.

I have enjoyed exploring WikiFur over the last few months, and my experience as a whole is summed up in Guide haha. Maybe it could be used as an official description...or something just to make everyone grin? Either way :-)--Tagenar 16:16, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Actually, I dropped by when you made the initial edit! It's not really "official" enough to be a description that I think we could use without people getting confused as to whether or not we were a joke site (and besides, I suspect Wikipedia would have quibbles with the definition - they are very clear about what things are part of their Wikimedia Foundation, and we're not), but it was amusing. :-) --GreenReaper(talk) 16:40, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
As long as it was amusing. Even if it's an inside joke, that really was the only intent ;-) Thanks.--Tagenar 17:47, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

about your edit to Tooth and Claw[edit]

You certainly deleted quite a bit of content in your edit. Cutting one sentence would have been sufficient. -- Siege(talk) 00:47, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

It's hard to know what to change. When an article is marked for cleanup, that's kind of a vague thing to go on. Hard to know what is "higher standard of quality" and what isn't. I figured my opinion of Victorian novels was the problem (only because it's true :-), but I was afraid I might've given away too much of the story, too. When I added Anonymous Rex (novel), I included some details and it ended up like an advertisement. I think I was afraid of that again so I over-edited. The article feels more balanced now with those details back in there, so thanks.--Tagenar 01:15, 3 August 2006 (UTC)