Hi, welcome to wikifur :) --Phroziac 15:42, 16 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks! It's all Giza's fault for getting me interested, but hey - this is pretty fun!
About admin status
Abuh? Well, that was unexpected! Thanks - I'll try to help out as best I can. --Duncan da Husky 17:18, 18 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- You came recommended - besides, you already have been helping, this just lets you help more. :-) --GreenReaper(talk) 17:29, 18 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Assigning fault :)
I see you blamed Giza for yourself...does that mean I get to blame you for me? ;) Rama
In fact this feature has been disabled on WikiFur because of a general Wikicities policy against offsite linking, and due to copyright concerns over linked images. The way you would do it if it was enables is to either just put the image URL, or put it as the "text" in a single-square-bracket URL link. --GreenReaper(talk) 17:37, 23 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- OK, that makes sense. I guessed it would be bad form, regardless. --Duncan da Husky 17:43, 23 Aug 2005 (UTC)
How speedy is speedy?
I'm a bit at sea on this and since you wrote the templates and original page for Speedy Deletes I'll send it your way: Exactly how speedy are speedy deletes intended to be? Let's say I log in and see three pages are marked for Speedy Delete - should those be removed on sight, after some deliberation on the article's Talk page, or after some set period of time? (I'd imagine this would be a good question to be addressed in WikiFur's currently nonexistant Admin Deletion Guidelines...) Any insight would be appreciated. --Duncan da Husky 00:53, 24 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- Yeah, I need to get those written up. ;) Or at least write up a policy and then have people edit it and vote on it before it becomes 'Policy', a la Wikipedia. Basically you should use common sense, review the edits and see if the reason stated for delete is true, check the article does have any past versions which contain content. Likewise read the article and see if it has any content or worthwhile value. It might need a little expanding and turning in to a stub than deleting. Finally, as with a recent mistake I made. If the article is about a person, check that a person with the same user name as the article wrote it. If so, move the content to their 'User:' page and leave a note about the fact the main namespace is for 'true' articles. That's.. all I think about for now. Hope that helps. :) -Nidonocu - talk 01:11, 24 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Hey, thanks I suppose for removing that tidbit that was posted on my profile. However, I didn't mind it, and it WAS true. If I was so inclined to keep it how do you suggest I keep it from being removed by future helpers who understably would assume I'd probably not want to list that?
- Well, if you're inclined to keep something that might not be complimentary, I would say to make sure that you make the edit while logged in and also to perhaps put a note on the Talk page for the article to the effect that you endorse the content of revision xx/xx/xx yy:yy:yy (time and date).--Duncan da Husky 12:15, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Double Redirect Weirdness?
I'm not quite sure what to make of the double redirect for Kelsey Peters/Sparkling. To gauge by the warning, it looks like it would be a circular redirect, but it appears that the Kelsey Peters page redirect is correct. Ideas?--Duncan da Husky 12:22, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)
- That is odd. I edited the redirect and it went away, so problem solved! ;-) --GreenReaper(talk) 13:36, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Re: The Bunnyhaven
I have to say I disagree with the delete, unless you've been in contact with the actual owner of the room and they requested it. It's a public location on a public MU*, and Jazzy isn't the owner. Carl Fox 02:58, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Which is exactly what I've done--the owner, upon being notified that I'd created the wiki page, asked that it be immediately removed and de-indexed if at all possible. I don't necessarily know the reasons why, but that's where it stands.
- If it's necessary, I'll put the owner in contact with whomever needs 'approval'. --Jazzy 03:39, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- I'll vouch for Jazzy on this one. I don't know the owner of the group, but if he says she made that request, that's good enough for me. --Duncan da Husky 12:33, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for protecting the 4chan entry. But they might hit other entries now...
Protect drama as thats what they're probably gonna target now...
Concerning an entry
Obviously you have noticed people trying to change this entry: http://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Evana_Love
As far as I can see it is nothing but unbacked accusations. There is no proof of any of this so it basically comes under slander. You're giving someone a bad name with no actual evidence.
If anyone has a problem with Evana, contact her through email.
Just posting this here so I don't forget...K.P. mentioned you were interested in getting more information on Megaplex. If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a line. :) Carl Fox 17:02, 24 January 2006 (UTC)