From WikiFur, the furry encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is a current featured article candidate. A featured article should exemplify WikiFur's very best work, and is therefore expected to meet several criteria. Please feel free to leave comments.

I agree, this page doesn't seem appropriate for inclusion on WikiFur, as any links to Twitter belong on the subject matter's articles, not collected under a medium/company-specific page. To second the template addition for delete, I too, recommend deletion. BlueOtter 13:07, 6 September 2011 (EDT)

Article update (March 8, 2012. #1)[edit]

Keep, merge, delete?. Vote on Keep if we can add enough furry feeds like LiveJournal or Facebook (a lot of furry conventions use it as main contact point) - Spirou 18:34, 8 March 2012 (EST)

Keep. Equivamptalk 19:06, 8 March 2012 (EST)
Delete. I don't feel this needs an article devoted to it in WikiFur, and creating a list of resources specific to the Twitter medium on this page becomes a synchronization nightmare with all the various articles that reference Twitter links in their own External Links sections. I think a better option is to simply let articles that have relevant Twitter feeds link them on the articles, and keep references to Twitter as a medium pointed to Wikipedia proper. BlueOtter 13:53, 28 June 2012 (EDT)
Delete, as I mentioned in the edit summary: there's a lack of "specific relevance here, just that some furries use it". -- Sine 14:05, 29 June 2012 (EDT)
Further thoughts? I'm seeing two suggestions to delete (BlueOtter and myself), one Keep if (Spirou) and one Keep (Equivamp). -- Sine 16:00, 3 December 2012 (EST)

Article update (April 30, 2013. #2)[edit]

Keep, merge, delete?. Still vote on Keep (Aka Facebook, LiveJournal, etc,...) - Spirou 02:07, 30 April 2013 (EDT)

Delete, still. -- Sine 12:58, 27 May 2013 (EDT)

Clarity edit[edit]

I changed "...140 characters (increased to 280 characters..." to "...280 characters (increased from 140 characters..." for clarity and accuracy; upon skimming the document, it may appear as if 140 is the current standard. If this was unnecessary and needs to be reverted, then I apologize! -- KupferudelWolf 4:30, 6 May 2019 (EDT)