Talk:Of the extermination of furfags

I've added the "appropriate?" tag to this. The "pamphlet" is your standard anti-furry text and doesn't seem particularly noteworthy. Making an article on it looks like trying to drum up publicity; for something that "went viral", it seems rather low-key. The only Google hit for "extermination of furfags" is the thread itself, which has only 105 posts after a month.--Higgs Raccoon 04:51, 24 October 2011 (EDT)

Localized to that forum only, non-propragated through furry lore (Net search: one, the forum). Trying to use Wikifur as springboard for attention, definitely not in the same league as How to draw TEH FURRY or Krystal can't enjoy her sandwich - 72.130.6.21 05:23, 24 October 2011 (EDT)

It's just a forum post with responses to it, not a "Pamphlet" - 72.130.6.21 05:27, 24 October 2011 (EDT)

Sorry if I did it wrong, I'm not a confirmed wiki editor. I did not know of the site but this link was shared by several of my friends on Facebook, who also found the text very unusual (the whole reasoning, the amalgamations with Wiccans, ...). Not that our opinion matters, but it was also posted on 4chan (I think Facebook actually followed) and led to many reactions. The forums seems to have been invaded by 4chan users and Anonymous after that. Neither Facebook walls or 4chan threads are indexed by Google, hence the absence of results there.

You have a point about not making more publicity than it deserves though. Maybe this should be merged into a "Pamphlets" article? I've seen this done on Wikipedia.--Kittyfurr 05:31, 24 October 2011 (EDT)

It's not a pamphlet, is just an anti-furry post. Other forums have dozens of them, like ED.ch, or Eat all Furries, all the time. A pamphlet would be physical based, and distributed. Again, this is just a rant, and unless notable, as the Burned Fur statement, not warrant of an article - Spirou 05:47, 24 October 2011 (EDT)