Does the Financials section really add anything of much interest to the article? It seems to me that a weblink to the appropriate financial documents should be adequate for anyone who is interested in that information. --mwalimu 17:07, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- I find them interesting. --EarthFurst 05:03, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Unfortunately the documents concerned are behind a login screen. I guess I could host them, but I think it's useful to have the information in the article - it's not immediately obvious what figures to pay attention to if you've not read such a form before. It would be less "blocky" if it was on separate pages, but we don't have them yet. --GreenReaper(talk) 05:38, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- True, I was wondering why we don't have separate pages for each year of the con like we've already done for some of the other cons. Once we do that, if we move the financials and such to those articles, they won't look quite so awkward. --mwalimu 08:50, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Fursuit parade numbers
- Indeed, I have a feeling it was over 300. Of course, FC is a larger con - the ratio was almost exactly the same, 15%. --GreenReaper(talk) 07:28, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
wikitable duplication: merge or split?
Just noticed the Information section has some duplication between the wikitables. Both tables have Attendees count column and Charity amount column. Also first table STARTS with first event, while the second table ENDS with first event. Also the first table is too-wide in some screen resolutions, thus resulting in a lot of whitespace between Information header and top of first wikitable. Suggest maybe first table should be smaller with just event dates, attendance numbers (including Percentage change, fursuiter counts, and parade counts), and charity names and charity amounts. With the second table also having dates PLUS the columns NOT in the new first table (Themes, Venues, GoHs, etc). --EarthFurst (talk) 23:50, 17 January 2022 (EST)