Talk:Furry femdom

If you feel this article is not appropriate for Wikifur, Spazkitty, than it should be deleted. I thought it'd be appropriate because there are furries who are into this kind of BDSM activity. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.214.47.16 (talk • contribs) .

Here's my opinion: There's not an article on most other fetishes, why does this one warrant its own? --IanKeith 08:05, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't see anything uniquely furry about this, and the topic is already addressed quite well in Wikipedia. I think this article should be deleted.----DuncanDaHusky^(talk) 13:31, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

It's a tricky question. There are a lot of articles in Category:Paraphilias. I also believe that Wikipedia is a better venue for this article, though, because there really doesn't seem to be anything specifically furry about the fetish as described here. This is in comparison to things like vorarephilia which have whole (and specifically furry) websites and MUCKs dedicated to them. The only bit that really seems to have anything to do with the furry fandom at all is the determination of roles, and it doesn't have any specification of what a "lesser species" is. Ultimately, it seems to come down to "furry femdom is femdom with furry characters", and just adding "furry" to a general term isn't really sufficient for an article. Perhaps a note at BDSM, which is basically a portal to other Wikipedia pages? --GreenReaper^(talk) 14:15, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Just to throw in my 2 cents, Googling for that term turns up 6 matches on Yiffstar, and not too much else -- a few references on fchan, and the rest of the matches seem to be from pages that are "keyword spamming".

I think at this time it would be more appropriate to have this page be a redirect to BDSM, along with a short blurb on that page. --Douglas Muth 18:30, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

I advocate the speedy deletion. -- Sirtim