Talk:Evana Love

From WikiFur, the furry encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

If you have an issue with some of the information presented here, please address it on this page. Simply blanking the information with no reason for it will always be reverted by the admins. --Duncan da Husky 21:07, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)

So what exactly is wrong with this article? --The Informant 08:39, 25, Jan 2011 (UTC)

Style for one - in several places the 'voice' of the article is either first or second person; it should be third person throughout. Also the tone of the article is not very neutral at all; the person who wrote it very much has an opinion and their writing reflects that opinion. Lastly, some of the assertions made are unsupported by any kind of reference. While Wikipedia-like referencing isn't required so far as I know, anything that could be considered an allegation of some sort needs some kind of supporting information. The last one is purely a question of style, but I don't see how it's good style to embed the full-sized images of chat or comment screencaps. I understand the necessity for them; all too often in controversy comments and remarks can mysteriously disappear after the fact :-) but I think a thumbnail linked to the full-sized capture would be better. --GingerM (Leave me a message) 02:15, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Holy CRAP does this read like an ED article[edit]

I honestly thought I was still there for a moment. This page is cancerous cancer. Equivamp 21:35, 10 June 2011 (EDT)

In fact ED's Dolphy page is less biased than this, though equally petty. Admittedly, it focuses less on furry art and more on her Jim Hawkins (I believe is the name) obsession. Equivamp 00:42, 11 June 2011 (EDT)

No. Not really. Not biased when it's actually true, (page is focused on all the shitstorms she's caused over stupid markings, shading techniques, color patterns etc etc) links and all. 15 yr old who visits ED, nuff said. TheInformant 7:07, 19 June 2011 (EDT)

The information on the Dolphy ED article is also true, but it's just as vehemently butthurt as this one. Equivamptalk 05:57, 16 July 2011 (EDT)


The whole article is orange. I think that says something. Equivamptalk 05:59, 16 July 2011 (EDT)

Christ on a stick! Can you at least keep the thumbnails in the right sections instead of plastering them all over the article? TheInformanttalk 09:10, 1 August 2011 (EDT)