Talk:DangerDoberman

I am registering my protest as to this article's removal. This individual was found guilty of "three counts of sexually assaulting an animal". I feel the article should remain so that people who might like to avoid associating with such an individual can be make a fully-informed decision.--Higgs Raccoon (talk) 14:23, 23 April 2016 (EDT)

Will restore it, so it can be discussed. - 00:07, 24 April 2016 (EDT)

Discussion

As Spirou has restored the article for discussion, I'll restate my opinion: I believe the article should stay, given it chronicles the very serious sex offences the subject was found guilty of. I believe this to be a case where the public interest should override a personal exclusion request.--Higgs Raccoon (talk) 18:37, 24 April 2016 (EDT)

I agree. Additionally, DangerDoberman was perfectly fine having an article here as long as that article only described a "consensual relationship" between a dog and a person he is "no longer associated with" (despite that person being DD himself). --Equivamp - talk 19:45, 24 April 2016 (EDT)