Talk:Chibiabos

So why has this been protected and such when you obviously don't care about people's requests for takedowns and privacy? 65.118.187.102 15:51, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

On the contrary, we care quite a lot. We just don't think that that should apply to Sibe, given his violent criminal record. He's not the only exception - there is one other person who I would definitely not recommend exclusion for, Bart Bervoets, and I have argued against exclusion in other cases. --GreenReaper^(talk) 07:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

I dont think thats fair. The furry community IS NOT law and order. No matter what someone has done, I dont feel that publicising his RL info ( Sibes ) has any positive purpose, other than to cause Sibe grief. Same goes for Chibiabos. IMO, Chibiabos is just as bad as Sibe, for different reasons. Chibiabos is definately an asshole of the first order and to read his 'crap' and his rallying other 'furries' to side against Sibe is just priceless. Since when has Chibiabos been righteous and upright? So, why one rule for him and another for Sibe? You should give Sibe the same courtesy as you have shown Chibiabos here because, if you knew what I knew about Chibiabos, he would be your enemy number one, NOT Sibe. Althou I am a little late giving my 2 cents, I am at least here to do it now. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.69.36.128 (talk • contribs) .

You don't think its fair that someone who has never committed a felony, never committed an act of violence or sexual attack and never attempted to forge a Wikifur post as Sibe has should enjoy the protections others do? Of Chibiabos or Sibe, which is known more publicly? Who has a felony record? Which has a history of committing violence? Which is a drug abuser? --71.217.92.163 11:56, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Lack of publicity and prosecution simply means you haven't been caught. If you'd also like to tout physical violence as somehow more serious than mental/emotional violence, I think the law will disagree with you. Finally, the old "drug abuser = godless commie" routine became obsolete and hypocritical when all the baby-boomers started becoming recreational drug users. This is a double-standard, and your word-salad cannot get around this. One policy, one love. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.102.66.250 (talk • contribs) .