WikiFur - User contributions [en]

BetaPaws Airbrushing

2010-08-18T05:17:26Z

Wolfmist: Created page with 'Betapaws is an airbrushing service for the Ontario furry community. They were established in August,2010 and the website went up in the same month. Previously the company was no…'

Betapaws is an airbrushing service for the Ontario furry community.

They were established in August,2010 and the website went up in the same month.
Previously the company was not announced as they just got into airbrushing and had some things to learn before going public.

They currently airbrush shirts, hats and plushies.
They plan to do more work as they evolve and progress into better techniques and applications.

Their webpage is a basic setup for now, with plans for future upgrades.

BetaPaws is unique as there is currently no furry only airbrushers around.
BetaPaws is taking this opportunity to provide the community with such a service, having found it's niche to do so.

You can always visit betapaws.com to check out pricing and some examples of work.

-= Webpage Link =-

[http://www.betapaws.com BetaPaws Airbrushing]

Talk:Furnal Equinox

2010-08-09T01:28:47Z

Wolfmist: /* Focus */

Furnal Equinox was not created by Danskunk, nor was it created by Ontariofurries and was put together by a committe of people who met on Ontariofurries but that was the extent of it, anything added by or about Danskunk was added by him and are falsifications and lies put into his head by his own self.
:If Dan Skunk was not the founder, can you please provide online evidence of who the real founder is, so this matter can be put to rest? [[User:Silver seren|Silver]][[User talk:Silver seren|seren]][[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]] 17:43, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Members of the committe and con as of First Con in 2010.

Co-Chairs: Blindsight_Wolf
Pakesh_De
Committe: Scani
Shane
Crassadon
ArrowRoot
ArcticFox
Morgan(now Deceased)

There was other people who were involved in the beginning months, they either dropped out, were removed or voted out. As the committee developed and became the current group.

Registered corporate members are: Blindsight_wolf, Scani, Pakesh_de, Shane, Crassadon.
These are people who are registered Directors of the convention. Legally registered on the NPO.

The list of members and concom is available at www.furnalequinox.com and also the original page creator is Scani, so you can also speak with him.

Shane.

: While the list of concom members is not available on Furnal Equinox's website, I can attest that the information Shane has provided is correct for the 2010 concom and can be sourced from our conbook for that year. To reiterate, the claims being made in the article do not reflect Furnal Equinox's stance. I'm open to any questions if desired, though. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 13:28, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

A lot of the source information was removed in 2009 as I removed the Toronto Furry Convention forum from Ontario Furries when it fell into dissuse and hadn't yet created a system to archive deleted posts.

There are a number of people that can corroborate my claim of starting Furnal Equinox, and I could cite some of the early conversations I had with people about the convention from the summer of 2008 but it will be impossible to present anything that can not be contested by Furnal Equinox.

I don't want to be associated with Furnal Equinox and I don't think they want to be associated with me, but I believe the community deserves to have an accurate history of events and that people should be credited for their contributions to the furry community.

As there is likely not going to be a consensus in this situation, the only solution I can see is that we have a section here describing controversy over certain facts and present the differing viewpoints people have on it.

--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 16:55, 18 July 2010

:It's... very unfortunate that a dispute between Dan and FE has been brought into the public eye once again. I don't wish to bring arguments with Dan onto WikiFur, because this is not its purpose for the articles here to be a battleground for the conflicts themselves... only how they're reported, if seen as notable enough to be.
:First of all, I've cleared the "Controversy" section from the article. However, in the interests of good faith, I've copied that section to the bottom of the talk page with two understandings: first, perhaps we can establish a consensus among not just Dan and FE but with the mediation of other WikiFur editors on whether it is needed. Secondly, if there is a consensus that it IS needed, then that section can be collectively edited by not just the stakeholders, but by all in a manner that is satisfactory to all. Personally, I can honestly say that we would rather not see the section there, because it brings forth conflict that, from our evaluation, people would rather just avoid. Moreover, its presence undermines the credibility of both parties.
:However, in the interests of disclosure, this is my understanding of the events that have taken place between Dan and FE (perhaps from a more FE-ish perspective)

:*A Toronto Furry Convention board existed on Ontario Furries from at least late 2008. A number of the current concom members posted on this forum, where a number of ideas were discussed (though no firm decisions re: the planning of the convention as it is taking place now took place as a result - i.e. we did not enter into any contracts with any party, and as the name will suggest, the name Furnal Equinox was not yet decided at this point.)
:*After several months of discussion, a private mailing list was created with the involvement of all those who expressed an interest in serving on the convention committee; their first action was to elect Pakesh De as convention chairman and subsequent decisions such as name, date, and venue were made through here.
:*Anthropomorphic Events of Ontario (AEO) was incorporated as a Ontario corporation without share capital on June 11, 2009. Dan's name was included in the application for incorporation as an initial director.
:*At a meeting of the convention committee on July 20, 2009, Dan was dismissed from Furnal Equinox's concom by a unanimous vote. His actions were perceived as progressively more erratic and independent of the direction the remainder of concom was taking (I refer to it as "we were moving left and he was moving right"), and the consensus was that his removal was in the best interests of the convention's success. He requested to be dismissed from being a director, due to not wanting to be exposed to the convention's liability anymore. This request was granted.
:*Following his removal, Dan expressed his displeasure in a number of ways, engaging in a great deal of public criticism of the convention on Ontario Furries. These criticisms were seen as highly counterproductive, an attempt to erode public confidence in the convention, and evaporated a great deal of goodwill towards him.
:*However, in an attempted gesture of good faith, Dan was mentioned and thanked by name in the conbook for the 2010 convention for his contribution.
:*The relationship between Furnal Equinox and Ontario Furries (the community forum which Dan administrates) has been quite rocky over the past year, and has sometimes been severed altogether to be later restored. However, following the convention in April 2010, Furnal Equinox's subforum on Ontario Furries was deleted without warning. When it became clear that any sort of diplomacy or negotiations to restore the forum would not be successful, the two parties agreed to mutually sever relations.

:It should be noted that I can not attest for any previous research towards the convention Dan may have accomplished. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 23:19, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

"Furnal Equinox was not created by Danskunk, nor was it created by Ontariofurries and was put together by a committe of people who met on Ontariofurries but that was the extent of it, anything added by or about Danskunk was added by him and are falsifications and lies put into his head by his own self."

The committee of people that met on [[Ontario Furries]] were all members of that web site at the time of their meeting; therefore, it would not be inaccurate to say they were Ontario Furries.

Claiming that I am lieing is slanderous. You should back up that claim, or qualify it by saying it's your opinion that they are lies.

Shane became involved the the project later than everyone else and was not involved in those early discussions and has no first hand experience on the events his claims are about.

--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 23:38, 18 July 2010

"He requested to be dismissed from being a director, due to not wanting to be exposed to the convention's liability anymore. This request was granted."

I did not make that request. I discussed it, but decided not to make the request. Had I done so, there would be no displeasure with the decision to remove me from being a director.

Quorum was not present at that meeting, making the decisions against the articles of incorporation. Others dismissed at that meeting were Sparrow and Danruk both of whom were involved in the convention planning prior to creation of the Toronto Furry Convention Board on Ontario Furries and were working with me and supporting my involvement. They were present at the first meetings with hotels, including the one chosen for the convention and instrumental to the success of the convention. None of us were present at this meeting to defend ourselves.

"His actions were perceived as progressively more erratic and independent of the direction the remainder of concom was taking (I refer to it as "we were moving left and he was moving right"), and the consensus was that his removal was in the best interests of the convention's success."

My experience was that being deliberately left out of planning discussions, not being given information I needed to be able to contribute, and being blamed for mistakes others made as a result of this lack of communication to me. My dismissal directly followed my criticism of this behaviour and recommendation that someone else act as chair.

"These criticisms were seen as highly counterproductive, an attempt to erode public confidence in the convention, and evaporated a great deal of goodwill towards him."

This criticism was considered a gesture of goodwill towards the success of the convention, and to prove my value to the success of the convention.

My predictions of wasted and mismanaged space, time, and resources proved to be correct durring the course of the convention. Had my recomendations been acted on, the convention, and it's members, in spite of my removal, would have saved a considerable amount of money. Instead, the recomendations were met with contempt and derision from the convention's remaining organizers.

The wholesale rejection of these recommendations, to me, showed that the success of the convention and service to the community was secondary to the organizers recieving personal recognition for their efforts.

Following the convention, I made public my complaint of unprofessional behaviour and personal prejudice towards me from staff both directly and through convention security after it was dismissed by co-chair, Pakesh De, as personal issues between me and the staff members and not the responsibility of the convention. Something I considered extremely irresponsible and unprofessional.

"It should be noted that I can not attest for any previous research towards the convention Dan may have accomplished."

That research was provided in the initial public discussions for the convention, and in information submitted to the committee after it was formed.

My original desire for contributing to this article was to add the details of Ontario Furries as the location of the forum discussions mentioned and Dan Skunk as the initiator of these discussions. I was, and continue to be the owner of Ontario Furries and it was in this capacity that I created this sub forum after making research into the feasibility of the project. I believe names of contributors and locations where discussions took place to be relevant to an article on the history of the convention. It is obvious that these discussions took place *somewhere* and were started by *someone*. The original organizing committee that created Furnal Equinox was formed through discussion on the Ontario Furries forum through a series of nominations and public voting presented on the forum

If there is contention to these facts, then I assert that this contention then is a relevant part of the history of the convention and that all sides of the contention deserve equal opportunity to present their claims so long as it is made known that these are claims and who is making the claims.

"Personally, I can honestly say that we would rather not see the section there, because it brings forth conflict that, from our evaluation, people would rather just avoid. Moreover, its presence undermines the credibility of both parties."

Wikifur is an encyclopedia which means it should contain factual information presented from a neutral point of view. I believe this means that if there is a dispute over facts, the nature of the dispute should be described in a way that does not attempt to promote either side of the dispute; Wikifurs's purpose is not to promote the credibility of individuals and organizations but inform the fandom of the facts related to them. Facts should not be deliberately omitted to improve the public image of individuals and groups.

In this spirit, I suggest Scani contribute to the proposed section to elaborate on Furnal Equinox's position on the disputed facts unless consensus can be agreed upon.

--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 05:39, 19 July 2010

:''Quorum was not present at that meeting, making the decisions against the articles of incorporation.''
:The assertion that the vote was invalid due to lack of quorum (i.e. a majority of members of the body) is incorrect. While the events in question took place a year ago and are slightly hazy on my part, at the absolute MINIMUM the remaining four directors and/or officers of the convention were present at the time to vote on the matter (which pertained to Dan's removal from concom, as well as from any further staff role with FE. To my recollection, at least five votes were cast; this would be a majority of the concom which consisted of nine members at the time. Moreover, in Ontario, a decision to amend governance would be governed by the corporation's bylaws, not the articles of incorporation. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 12:05, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

::There were 8 committee members at the time. Quorum was decided to be 5 so that there would be a majority. Since there were only 4, then quorum was not reached.

::There could not be 5 votes with only 4 members present.

::I was never made aware of the articles of incorporation or that they were on the application for incorporation.

::I was never made aware of the existence of corporate bi-laws while a director of the corporation.

::I was present for an earlier meeting where it was decided by majority vote that quorum would be 5 to constitute a majority of the 8 members.

::These are only some examples of the unprofessional conduct of members of the committee. While I was a registered director of the corporation, my inquiries into the financial and corporate activities of the corporation were deliberately ignored and I was not informed of decisions being made that affected business of the corporation. My criticism of decisions behind made was strongly discouraged by the chairman ordering me to stop, by insults from committee and staff members, and by being ignored. I was informed by Blindsight that he was asserting his dominance and that I would need to change my behaviour if I wanted to be in the loop.

::--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 00:50, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

:::First of all - I said there were certainly at LEAST four votes, and recall specifically that there were at least five (considering Pak and I recall that Shiro was also present at the meeting). As Shane served in a secretarial role for concom meetings at the time, he would have the record thereof, but I am nonetheless confident that the decision represented the desires of the organization of a whole. While I can understand it being controversial if there had been dissent at the meeting, there was none. This is in line with the purpose of quorum from a moral standpoint (if not a legalistic one) where an unduly small number of people on a governing body do not control the decisions thereof.
:::''I was never made aware of the articles of incorporation or that they were on the application for incorporation.''
:::Your signature was required on the application document, and as far as I know, was obtained at a meeting in early June 2009. Presumably, you would have had the opportunity to review the completed application, which included first directors and "objects of the corporation" at any time while the application was in front of you.
:::I can not speak for these so-called "insults" from concom, but as far as I'm concerned, I did my best to interact with you in good faith, and despite my initial reservations re: your presence, you had every opportunity from me to demonstrate value to us - and I truly believed that because of the quantity of your social network you could be an asset to our operations. Obviously, this did not prove to be the case, and the concom's decision reflected that after several months of working with you.
:::The point I'm trying to make in all of this really has to come down to the group dynamics that worked themselves out. When we first came together, and one of the concerns was coherency. Bringing people together is one thing, but to actually develop some common goals and common purpose is another altogether. A group of people in the same room does not necessarily equal a team. And... regardless of how much work you DID accomplish in the leadup to this, it's another thing to work together, and that impression in your case just wasn't there. People weren't here to just follow your lead. Had you remained present, a lot more friction would have developed, and probably would have had a negative impact on the convention's success. As it turned out... there was a lot of friction anyway. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 12:09, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

::::It was my oversight for not reading through the entire application. We seemed in a hurry to get it done so I just trusted I was already told what was in it.

::::We had a common goal. That was not an issue.

::::I never expected people to follow my lead or anyone else's lead. I expected them to work together as equals. That requires that people communicate their ideas with each other, accept criticism with each other, and make decisions together as a group. Some where not willing to do that, and that's what caused problems.

::::Regardless, my contributions should not be deleted from this article.

::::--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 12:55, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Additional Info: I was a helper to Blindsight at the time and was at the meetings as secreatary and I can attest, after discussions about why to remove Danskunk, the good and bad things he has done for the convention. He was voted out, with Quaorum with a unanimous vote to remove him from the con period.

I may even still have the records as they were transcribed and sent to the list and FE forums that we have of our own.

If Danskunk demands all facts and things should be allowed, then he should freely allow all the "facts" about himself on his wikifur page that pertain to the community and fandom.

Danskunks "Research" was checked out by me and took less then 5 minutes with a quick "wikifur" search, where all his information and research was from.
-Shane Nicholson(WolfMist)

:I accept all facts to be included in this article; any facts that are in dispute should be clearly described as so.

:My research took place over many months of travelling to Toronto to look at possible venues, through discussions with members of the community interested in helping, interviews with people who were directors at other successful conventions, some of it was collected from wikifur, but it was also re-organized to better serve our needs. I also brought observations from many years of attending conventions.

:Shane was not involved in this reasearch.

:--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 01:02, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

It's quite evident that we're not going to reach a consensus on this. Could we start working on editing the proposed section to include what information we all want to provide there?

--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 01:09, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

:Primarily speaking, the parties involved here are FE and you. I'd honestly be more comfortable seeking the opinions of neutral parties if possible, to objectively assess what the value of what you're proposing is - as neither of us will be able to do that. Will this controversy, namely, be important five years down the line?
:Re: the section that was recently added listing 'founding members' - a few of the names asked to withdraw their involvement quite early, and they may object to their appearance here in this article. The list also fails to acknowledge individuals that came on board after founding whose contribution nonetheless played an instrumental role in the convention's success... and I honestly feel they should not be trivialized (people like Morgan, Arrowroot, etc.)
:So I'm not sure if the section as it currently stands is appropriate, but if others say it should, alphabetical would be more appropriate. Perhaps the information is better classified elsewhere, but I'll comment more on that tomorrow. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 03:26, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
::I've made it alphabetical. I didn't know about later joining members. Perhaps we should keep the current list, though rewrite the lead-in to say original founding members and then have a separate sentence listing those that joined in after the fact? They should certainly be recognized.

::And if any of the people listed do not wish their name to be associated with Furnal Equinox, then they just have to speak with Greenreaper and he will take them off and make sure they stay off of the list. [[User:Silver seren|Silver]][[User talk:Silver seren|seren]][[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]] 03:39, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

:::My suggestion would be that if needed, the relevant information be placed in a 'current' and 'former' section in the article (perhaps as a two-column table) - or at least other titles that represent those who are still working on the convention and those who have moved on to other projects. There should be no particular stigma associated with the latter. Also, ref. proposed changes below (you can always refer back to previous edits for previous versions) --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 11:52, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

::::I don't believe a current and former section is necessary. There is already an origins section there which is appropriate to list the original organizers in, describe their contributions, and when and why they left.

::::I sincerly appreciate you acknowledging that the discussions began on Ontario Furries, Scani. If there is consensus on that fact, then I believe it can stand in the origins section where I originally placed it as it is most relevant to that topic. I would also like it stated that I started the conversation there. Another contributer has been contesting both though so it may only be able to stand as a contested fact, but it can be stated the we both support it.

::::I don't believe a description of my removal should be in an Ontario Furries section as it is not relevant to Ontario Furries, but to myself only. My criticism should also not be included there as it was my personal opinion--not that of Ontario Furries.

::::I think we could put it the description of my and Ontario Furries's involvement in the origins section as it is most relevant there. I don't believe either are important enough to warrant their own headlines.

::::I disagree with saying there was a lack of shared direction, as there was a shared direction: producing a convention, a goal which all parties made contributions critical to it's success. The only disagrement was over details of how to accomplish those goals and responsibilities of individual members. I may wish to describe what those were.

::::I also disagree with saying there was a conflict between me and the rest of the concom because that was not true. I had disagreements with only half of the concom. I'd also like it stated that everyone that supported my inclusion was also removed.

::::I'd like to add my own perception of my criticism's as I saw them quite differently.

::::I contest that there was no warning, as I made repeated requests of FE to change their behaviour and would like to add my own assesment of why they were removed.

::::I'll get to adding my revisions later.

::::--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 13:28, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

:::Scani, as long as there is someone that feels the information to be valuable, there is no reason it can not be included. Other parties are free to contribute their knowledge to the article as well, as this is a colaborative effort but no one should be censoring other people's contributions based on their assesment of how valuable they are. Readers should be given the opportunity to have as much information as possible and decide for themselves what is or is not valuable to them.

:::Whether or not someone wishes to be included in the article or not is irrelevant. Deliberately presenting false information, or omitting information for the purpose of manipulating public opinion for any reason is dishonest and against the spirit of wikifur as being a place to present factual information from a neutral perspective.

:::Making the list alphabetical sounds good to me. Thank you.

:::If someone does not want to be associated with Furnal Equinox, it should be added to the article that they do not wish to be associated with it, thusly satisfying their desire for disassociating without sacrificing the integrity of facts. However, I think stating that they resigned, should be enough to indicate their lack of support.

:::--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 12:33, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

== Relationship with Ontario Furries (proposed) ==

Discussion for what became Furnal Equinox originally took place on the [[Ontario Furries]] forum, operated by [[Dan Skunk]]. Though Dan was originally involved in planning discussions, he was removed from the Furnal Equinox organizing committee and board of directors in July 2009 due to lack of shared direction and conflicts between him and the remainder of concom.

Many of Furnal Equinox's concom members have taken the stance that Dan's publicly posted and unsolicited criticisms since his removal have been disproportionately critical of the con and its staff, and negatively affected its reputation. Dan has claimed that his removal was unjustified, and that he has been subjected to negative treatment and insults by other staff members. Both claims are disputed by the other party.

The relationship between members of Furnal Equinox's convention committee and Dan has remained strained, culminating in the removal of Furnal Equinox's subforum and the banning of a number of committee members without warning in April 2010. Currently, Furnal Equinox and Ontario Furries have no formal connections.

Propose addtions to Origins instead of Relationship with Ontario Furries section.

I've been researching more details, so much of the Ontario Furries discussion is redundant.

--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 12:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

== Origins ==

[[Dan Skunk]] was removed from the Furnal Equinox organizing committee and board of directors in July 2009 over disagreements with some of the other committee members. [[M-So]] and [[Danruk]] were also removed on this date.

:[[Dan Skunk]] contests the decision as quorum was not present at this meeting and none of the people removed were given an opportunity to be present to defend themselves. He claims the dismissals were politically motivated because he expressed a lack of confidence in [[Pakesh De]] chairship immediately prior to being removed and that the others removed were friends of his.

:[[Scani]] claims [[Dan Skunk]] was removed over conflicts with other members of the concom and a lack of shared direction and that the decision represented the desires of the organization as a whole.

==Relationship with Ontario Furries==

[[Furnal Equinox]], along with members of the concom, [[Pakesh De]], [[Blindsight]], [[Shane]], [[Chris]] were banned from discussions on [[Ontario Furries]] in April 2010 for repeated insulting and defamitory comments.
:[[Scani]] claims it was without warning.
:Many of Furnal Equinox's concom members have taken the stance that Dan's publicly posted and unsolicited criticisms since his removal have been disproportionately critical of the con and its staff, and negatively affected its reputation.

Dan fails to mention, Blindsight was banned for no reason, in fact he was banned because "he is responsible for what Pakesh says" on the forums or IRC.

==Request for Intervention==

This situation has become absolutely ridiculous, and I'm not satisfied with it whatsoever. The changes made by Dan to the article over the past couple of years have resulted in a significant decrease in quality in the article, not to mention a significant shift away from a neutral point of view. The changes that were made can only be described as "self-aggrandizing" and disproportionate to the remainder of the article.

Is it possible for both parties to lay off editing and that another party come in to perhaps arbitrate this issue? This is the continued manifestation of a conflict between Dan and Furnal Equinox - and I really don't feel it's fair for Dan to continue to edit the article unilaterally and play up his importance (just as it wouldn't be fair for us to do likewise). --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 20:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

:I haven't been following this situation that closely but I will offer a couple of observations:
:#If someone is posting information they claim to be true and others dispute it, then one side or the other needs to provide references to back up their claims. If neither side is able to do so, then it reverts to the level of hearsay, and we have to settle for something like "So-and-so claims X but others have disputed this." Also note that any allegedly deleted websites may in fact be preserved at sites such as [http://www.archive.org/web/web.php The Internet Wayback Machine] and those are generally as reliable as the original sites if the material still exists there.
:#We don't need a detailed play-by-play of who said what and what happened when. The only people who care about that level of detail are the handful of people who were directly involved. A summary description is good enough for the other 99% of us, and that's all we need on Wikifur. And it's quite possible that a summary description can be written in a manner that much of the content under dispute doesn't even matter at that level of detail. Try to imagine how you'd summarize something that happened a few years ago, then do it that way.
:I hope this helps. Oh, and here in the talk page, please remember to sign your posts with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). --[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 21:58, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

::I think a few notible points in the development and who was responsible for them is reasonable.

::If someone thinks they're important, and they're factual and referenced, there's no reason for them not to be included.

::It's a fair look at who contributed what in the lead up to the event. If someone happens to have made a lot of contributions, they'll of course be mentioned more. I any case, it's unfair and misleading to remove all reference to someone who made contributions.

::Arbitration is unnecessary, you have the opportunity to add anything that was left out.

::Please refrain from personal attacks, Scani. If you have something to contest, it can be removed as a fact.

::--Dan Skunk 22:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

:::That's more than a few notable points. If you were viewing the article about some other convention that's been running for several years, would you really care to see that level of detail about how it got started, to the level of quotations from the parties involved, assuming you were at most only casually acquainted online with any of the people involved? Most people wouldn't, and I don't think most people do here either. It could be argued that it should be preserved for those with enough historical interest to care, but the main article about the convention here on Wikifur is not the place to do it. (On an unrelated style note, only the first occurrence of each person mentioned in the article should be wikilinked.) --[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 22:34, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

::::I think it would be fine without the quotes, and just a few notes.

::::The name of the forum mentioned and who started the discussion does not seem to be too much to include, as it only adds five words. That's what I find most important and relevant as the section is about origins and that describes where the organization originated, and who it originated from.

::::That was contested and removed, so I did some research and found a reference to it, hence the quote and link backing it up. I could replace the quote with a footnote of where the reference is located.

::::While doing research to find that reference, I found who found the venue and who found the date. Those are at least as notible as who thought of the name, so if originator of the name is included, I think that of the venue and date should be as well.

::::I thought it was interesting to watch how the idea of the convention was developed from another event, and thought that would be interesting to show. I could be included in a seperate page though describing a timeline for those so interested to view it without hindering the conciseness of the main article. I could also do that without offering all the quotes, but rather references to them.

::::Linking only the first occurance seems reasonable as it makes the article easier to read. I don't understand signing posts with 4 tildes. What does that do? My appologies for being new to wikifur. I had stuff to contribute, especially to my own article, and am learning how to work with people here as I go. Thank you for the help.

::::--Dan Skunk 23:44, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

:::::I apologize for my brusqueness earlier - this process has been tremendously frustrating. From my own personal opinion, the edits which added comments such as "Dan Skunk... made the first visit", "Dan Skunk created a board..." and "Dan Skunk promoted having the convention..." in rapid succession, especially considering the edits were made by Dan, did come across in a very self-promotional manner and rubbed me the wrong way. A significant number of Dan's edits since this issue have had something to do with attributing foundation to Furnal Equinox to Dan and his website, Ontario Furries.
:::::I perceive the basic issue at hand to be "how much credit should be given to Dan Skunk for the establishment of Furnal Equinox in this article". This is also not a fight about "contesting" material; the ideal solution would be an article that is acceptable to both parties, and... well, the unsolicited edits to the page certainly breached my understanding that was something that could be worked towards. Not only one that is based in fact but one that is fair, neutral, and NOT an attempt to dig up dirt. I left a message asking for arbitration because it did not seem possible to do this.
:::::The question, too, is what proportion of recognition is appropriate. A project such as running a convention is collective, not individual. There are a lot of people who saw this work to completion, and I don't think it's appropriate to throw them in the background so that one person can come forth unilaterally and say "I did this and this." Moreover, who's to say there weren't people who looked into the feasibility of a furry convention in Toronto prior to this? (Yes, I know, citation needed.)
:::::My proposal remains a list of current and former people involved in a concom role in the current 'Staff' section, as well as an acknowledgement that initial discussion took place on Ontario Furries. (Honestly, given an opportunity, I'd like to turn back the clock to 19 May but realize that's not likely.)
:::::For the record, signing a message with four tildes will post your current username (or IP address if you are not logged in), as well as the current date and time. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 04:30, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

::::::Thank you, Scani. I appreciate the appology and forgive that.

::::::I can certainly understand how the edits I made would seem self promotional, especially comming from myself. That's why I was trying to include other names in it as well. I was hoping if someone had something they though should be mentioned about them, that they should add it as well, resolving more of the one sidedness.

::::::Unfortunately, if we are to be honest and neutral, I did contribute a lot of essential information and resources to the convention. To minimize those contributions would be not be honest and neutral.

::::::Scani's proposal.

::::::I think only adding that the discussion took place on Ontairo Furries would be deminishing my contribution. The discussions took place on Ontario Furries, but as is show from the email referenced, those discussions were started by me only after I had gathered the financial resources needed to start the convention.

::::::A more accurate description would be, "After gathering the needed financial resources to start a convention, Dan Skunk, started a discussion on Ontario Furries inviting others to become involved with the project." That will remove the incorrect information that the financial resources were brought together though those discussions. It also shows who initiated the process.

::::::You've mentioned who thought of the name, but if there's anyone, at all, that should be mentioned, it's the person that came up with the idea to start seriously working on the project.

::::::There were others that looked into running a convention Toronto that year. I started looking at venues following the first Islington Furmeet on June 14, 2008. Pyhrra did so as well but he concluded it was not a good time to start one based on economic conditions. M-So did asked me to help him look at venues on November 19, 2008.

::::::M-So and I concluded it was feasible and that we would work together on it.

::::::He should probably be mentioned as founding it as well.

::::::I would certainly prefer to come to a consensus on what to include in the article. But giving my experience with this article, I'm not certain that's possible. You've very diplomatic and professional about things, but you and me are not the only people interested in the article.

::::::We can't turn back time, but we could certainly repair mistakes. If it's something about me, I'm very forgiving. You just need to appologize and undo whatever was wrong.

::::::If it were up to me, I'd have turned back time to December 3, 2008, and not made a post inviting people to help with the convention untill *after* creating an npo and contracting the hotel--thusly completely avoiding this whole controversy and a lot of frustration and heartache to a lot of people.

::::::Thanks for letting me know what the tildes do.

::::::[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 18:59, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Greetings to this thread which is currently growing to become a small editorial if not soon a book with special guest stars.

The current issue is credit where credit is due. Dan claims to have been *the* original creator of the con based on his board, gathering of folks, and even finding a backer. All said and done, but the *idea* which is being missed is the real idea was well over a decade ago when folks like me, benjamin, deuce, hiker, and many other old furs of the fandom groused about a con local to Toronto which then grew to become as we all know as Feral.

Now Dan was there at the start, had done some work, and did indeed find some folks that got together to make a functional convention yes. However personal issues much less other incidents which need not , or should not, need to be bandied about made such a arrangement intolerable and sadly it was a case of *my way or the highway* and the concom voted to remove what was perceived as the greatest trouble with the least amount of gutting of the con. Now and since then the level of anger from said removed party has led to folks in large numbers banned from his board while he continues to attack the con without any feedback from us as being some of the banned folks in question to simply and repeatedly asking to have issues reopened that were voted closed.

That is fair, and all part of being a open and democratic process. The issue is if this is all being done to simply add credit where credit is due then simply what is being told as * dan, danruk, sparrow* were at the start but were voted out after issued arouse should.. note *should* be enough for most folks. Apparently this is NOT the case and thus after many attempts personally to resolve the issue and being rebuffed I had to delegate any talks about Dan to the PR head Scani. I am only posting now after seeing this topic refuses to fall back into a common thread of acceptance with repeated rebuttals of any and all information we can provide. I wish to stay civil and not fall for the supposed * slander* attempts,and btw, slander is a very easy word to misuse and with the stuff being posted on your own board dan by yourself that others are reporting to us, one should be *very* careful when tossing that word around. I accept giving dan, danruk, and sparrow credit for being at the start and getting a few things going certainly. Claiming basically * if it was not for me NONE of this would have happened* is taking credit well into the realm of tooting ones own horn.

IF this is all that is needed, i will ask that any and *all* talk of the convention is simply kept on topic and in more terms of * yes and we thank you but we had to let you go* as in terms of a employee being let go from the company rather then the slant that is being pushed out as if we all sat around in some plotting basement to overthrow folks and thus hijack the whole convention our-self. That is why we voted in concom to have a legal amount, plus the other staff that was around, voted, and revoted just to make sure the vote was open. I have told Dan this, others have told Dan this, and it refuses to simply sink in. The con did not, was not, and with all the bad blood, will not, have anything to do with Dan period. Note this can change if the lopsidedness does stop but alas many have tried and failed to get the point through.

I thank everyone for adding to the topic and folks for trying to make one side see the light. I wish to thank wikifur for letting us post the con and will hope they will be happy to have us stay. I wish to thank Scani for being PR and dealing with this topic with skill, grace, and civility. I wish to thank dan for continuing to claim credit well after the fact, and as is his right, can and will be mentioned as * a founding member* if so wanted, and IF as mentioned earlier, any and all unwarranted comments, attacks, and shenanigans on his side of the boards will cease and desist. one can hardly ask to be listened to and have demands of any sort treated fairly if only one side is playing the game above board..or one hopes it should be both sides playing fair.

Gaia bless and sorry for such a long winded reply.

Pakesh_De

ChairCritter for Furnal Equinox

:I never claimed to be the first person to think of having a convention in Toronto. I even cited other people speaking of it before me to show that. It wasn't however, untill I gathered financial support and sought others to be involved that it came to fruition.

:That fact should be included.

:"my way or the highway"

:I never once made any such demand. Please stop accusing me of it if you can't provide any evidence to support it.

:"That is fair, and all part of being a open and democratic process."

:That's what I actually asked for, and it was asked for, not demanded.

:"...slander is a very easy word to misuse and with the stuff being posted on your own board dan by yourself that others are reporting to us, one should be *very* careful when tossing that word around."

:I can support what I said there with citations. I'll do that as soon as I can for you.

:"Claiming basically * if it was not for me NONE of this would have happened* is taking credit well into the realm of tooting ones own horn."

:I never made that claim either.

:I claimed to have got financial support together and started a discussion on Ontario Furries and supported that claim with a citation that showed nothing more than that.

:If you wish to be fair, as you claim to be, then you should not have a problem with that being included.

:" I wish to thank dan for continuing to claim credit well after the fact, and as is his right, can and will be mentioned as * a founding member* if so wanted, and IF as mentioned earlier, any and all unwarranted comments, attacks, and shenanigans on his side of the boards will cease and desist. one can hardly ask to be listened to and have demands of any sort treated fairly if only one side is playing the game above board..or one hopes it should be both sides playing fair."

:I'm pretty sure wikifur articles were not meant to be used as extortion to silence unwanted criticism from other web sites.

:People saying what you want them to on other web sites should not be a condition of whether something is contested or not.

:Please stop taking my words and infering things from them I never said or meant and making accusations you can't support.

:This is why we have trouble speaking with each other, and why I strongly suggested someone else act as chairman before being fired from FE. If someone like Scani, who as we both agree, has the ability to speak with skill, grace, and civility, were chairman, relations between FE, Ontario Furries and I would probably have never degraded in the first place.

:The first time I banned FE from Ontario Furries, your discussion with me had me wanting to make it permanent. It was Scani's respectful and professional manner and his willingness to take responsibility for problems and solve them that convinced me to give you a second chance. It's unfortunate he isn't able speak for the rest FE.

:[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 03:31, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

::Okay, I'm going to weigh in my opinions. As an outside party, I feel it might be worth it.
::As I can see, OntarioFurries has been mentioned in the description of the convention. Should every mention of it be scrubbed? No. Should they all stay? No. This is why OF has a stub of its own. If references to the involvement need to be said, put them there.
::Dan is mentioned on the page as it is. Please see the above comment regarding OF - All of the same opinions apply.
::The page for Furnal Equinox is to give people interested in finding out about it more information about the event. You need only cite a reference and people can choose to go look for themselves. This is the whole reason citations exist.
::As for the editing war going on: give it a rest folks. The page is good. it has the info. Leave it be for a while. Nothing will be added continuing to say that things are in contention.
::To sum it up one last time: rest the topic and move on. Please? Either leave the article info to the people currently involved with the event, or to outside neutral third parties. Wikifur is not the place for personal grievances. (IMHO, no public forum is)
::[[User:Felinaeus|Feli]] 21:36, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

:::Actually, Ontario Furries was removed as a reference.

:::Other people have been named with a description of their contribution. It's only fair that mine be as well.

:::I did cite a reference, and it was removed as well.

:::Not continuing to remove facts that are not in contention and supported by citation should resolve the debate.

:::People who are currently involved in the event should not control what is said about past members.

:::No, it's not a place for personal grievances, but it should be a place for facts.

:::I was just trying add my involvement in the fandom to the appropriate articles. Only FE keeps trying to remove parts of it.

:::[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 03:31, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Danskunk was officially removed from Concom unanimous vote on 7/20/09

==========================
Removal of Dan from concom and staff. Passed. Unanimous Vote
Dan as Staff. Vote was (4)No - (1)Yes. Failed.
Danruk removed from Concom to staff. Passed. Unanimous Vote.
Sparrow removed. *Pro-Forma* Unanimous.
==========================

Excerpt from the Meeting minutes from the date of the meeting.
He knew of the meeting and didn't show up. As can be seen, he was voted of concom and staff as unanimous.
He was not allowed on as staff on a vote of 4-1. The was a Quorum, as for Danruk and Sparrow, both had not been in contact with the committee members and con in a long time. So they were voted on and removed. This was the same time the "new, current and formal" committee was made. Before this it was done at meetings. Not on the forums.

==Meeting Notes==

Who just went in and edited the original committee list? That was not the original committee at all. I went to actually meetings with them and have notes from them.

[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 04:10, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
:Both you and the other user have stated to have copies of the meeting notes that verifies their own argument. However, neither of you have produced visible evidence of these notes as proof for your argument. Could both of you please upload them so that we can view them? [[User:Silver seren|Silver]][[User talk:Silver seren|seren]][[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]] 04:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

::Wolfmist just proved my own argument with the notes he posted. How could I, Danruk, and Sparrow be removed if we weren't already members.

::And who was present at that meeting? I'm only aware of 4, and there were 5 votes.

::[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 04:25, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

There was no concrete committe at that time, only the people who were a form of a committee, at that time the NPO wasn't even signed or registered. So it wasn't even a legal corporation at the time.

You three were considered "members" even though you had not been to any meetings or attending anything. In fact you were the only 3 left who hadn't just walked away and made it clear. yet you were never part of anything. As it stands, I have given factual records of what happened, you have yet to prove anything, from you claiming to be a founder or founding committee member, considering there wasn't even a committee at that time, just a gathering of people.

-Shane

:I said members, I said nothing about meeting attendance.

:You even called it a concom in your own notes. There wouldn't be any voting and you wouldn't be calling it a concom if there was no convention committee.

:And the NPO did go through, with my name on it as a director, I have emails saying I was being removed from it. I wasn't trying to include that either.

:[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 04:44, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

It can be called whatever in the notes, the fact is. I and the others know what happened, we have the facts and the proof and all you have is the constant crap you keep adding. For someone who hates the con so much and the people involved, your pretty damn insistent and adamant about taking as much credit for it as possible. You've done nothing for this con, except put it down during the planning and even after the con finished, you made it clear about your dislike and even hatred of the con and the people involved, yet you continue this nonsense to give yourself as much credit as you can. you were give your "Thank you" in the conbook (Which I can also scan and post) and you should be greatful for that much and move on.

It was a hard decision to even give you that small "Credit" after all the negativity you are putting on the convention and the people involved.

Please move on - Shane.

:The insults are not necessary.

:Neither is the slander. I never said I hated the people involved in the con.

:It was called a concom because it was a concom. You can't just declare over a year later that what we were all saying, and what you were saying now was all wrong.

:[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 05:30, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

I have the citation saying I started a discussion on Ontario Furries after getting financial backing than anyone can look at in the torfur archives. Could I just add that only? Or even at least put something down saying it's a personal claim?

I have email from the torfurcom list as well:

::Welcome to the "Torfurcon" mailing list
::Wed, March 11, 2009 7:46:00 PM
::...
::From:
::"torfurcon-request [at] lists.forterosso.com" <torfurcon-request [at] lists.forterosso.com>
::...
::
::To: danskunk@rogers.com
::Hey guys... to make things a little bit easier to manage (and pursuant to Roo's request), I've created a mailing list for ::convention discussion - you can send to torfurcon -AT- lists -DOT- forterosso -DOT- com and they'll be redirected to all of ::us.
::
::Please contact Scani if you have any concerns or wish to be unsubscribed. Thanks!Welcome to the Torfurcon [at] ::lists.forterosso.com mailing list!
::
::....

I'll let someone look at my mail if they need to even.

The insults and slander are far out of proportion to what I want to do here in my opinion.

I just want wikifur to have an accurate picture of my involvement in the fandom.

[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 05:48, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

I have nothing else to say, facts are facts and you need to move on and get your reality straight.
No insults have been made to or about you, just facts and truths.

Edit: Lots of people were on that "list" that were intially not supposed to be and are no longer on it, that was also during the initial stages of many things and problems being worked out.

-Shane

:Those are not facts, they're opinions, I dispute your accusation that I hate the people involved in the con. That makes it not a fact.

:I edited the article to remove more inaccuracies.

:"Toronto Furry" as an organization is a loosely affiliated group of resources serving members accross Ontario. It's area include the location of [[Camp Feral]] and [[C-ACE]] which have had up to 130 and 224 attendees, respectively. The "Toronto Furry Home Page" became known as "Ontario Furries" on November 13, 2008, reflecting this service area.

:Clarification of whether "Toronto area" or "Toronto Furry" is intended is needed.

:http://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Toronto_Furry
:http://en.wikifur.com/wiki/C-ACE
:http://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Camp_Feral

:The convention originated with private discussions between [[Dan Skunk]] and other individuals and later moved to forum discussions.

:http://mailman.catsden.net/mailman/listinfo/torfur , December 2nd, 2008.

:The name Furnal Equinox, was not chosen by questionairre. the results of the questionairre held, "Great Canadian FurCon" as the winning name.

:::CON NAME: What is your first and second choices for on name?
:::[ 2 ] OnFurCon
:::[ 7 ] TorFurCon
:::[ 11 ] Furnal Equinox
:::[ 13 ] Great Canadian FurCon

:"Furnal Equinox" was chosen later by a email discussion with the committee. It was declared the winner on June 11, 2009 with 2 votes made by Shiro Tora and Pakesh De.

:TorFurCon mailing list, June 7, 2009
:TorFurCon mailing list, June 11, 2009

:[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 11:56, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

::Alright, now I am involved.
::C-ACE was an event held in an Ontario location, but was not resourced by Toronto Furries any more than What The Fur is on Ontario Furries.
::Dan, Please stop throwing terms around which have no bearing on the current situation. The staff of Furnal Equinox has not been slandering nor insulting you. As a matter of fact, the inverse is true. Wikifur is not the place for arguments, nor personal vendettas. This is a place for information. Factual verifiable information. Forums and Livejournal are the place for personal opinion.
::No one is claiming that you were not involved at the very start of the organization. However, following your departure from the committe, you were not involved with FE any more than you were with any other convention's con-com. The forums serve as a place to announce information about conventions. Using forums as such does not constitute direct involvement on a personal level. If this were the case, then Benjamin from Furry.ca has had as much involvement in FE.
::I would highly suggest that all parties just drop the subject. Nothing is served by anyone dragging this on, especially here on Wikifur. I would ask the admins to perhaps monitor for any changes, and if I have stepped over the line I do apologise.
[[User:Felinaeus|Feli]] 14:30, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

:::The "Toronto Furry" area has included Ottawa for a long time, hence the name change. C-CACE was within that area.

:::If I back up my claims, they're not slander. And I've not insulted anyone. Please cite where you think this has occured.

:::I am *trying* to put verifiable factual information here and it very much is being removed.

:::I never said offering forums constituted any involvement. That's not what I'm trying to add here.

:::[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 15:52, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Wolfmist, please stop undoing edits and placing back information that's being contested.

[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 16:24, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

== Removed information - request for clarification ==

"Prior to Furnal Equinox's establishment, the largest gatherings in the [[Toronto Furry|Toronto area]] tended to be larger furmeets such as the [[Islington Furmeet]] and BBQs hosted by [[Potoroo]], which regularly attracted between 50 to 100 people."

This appears to be a fact. It is contested that Camp Feral and C-ACE are examples or earlier conventions held in the Toronto area. I see no problem in adding in Camp Feral to the line, since it generally only has 100 people as it is, so that shouldn't be a problem. However, C-ACE is not a furry convention, it merely has a few furry themes. It is, if you look at the [http://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Template:Conventions template], under the non-furry section. So I do not believe it should be held as an example of a furry convention in the area.

"The convention originated from discussion on forums in late 2008 and early 2009, bringing together a number of interested individuals and the financial resources to develop a convention committee and the required organization."

This, also, is a fact and applies to Dan Skunk as well. The main problem seems to be that Dan Skunk would like his name mentioned, but since no other names are mentioned in the statement, I think it is fair to keep it without any of the contributing members' names.

"and was added to a list of names on a questionairre to consider what name was best, these were answered by the local furries at Islington Meet and tallied up later."

This line is disputed because it seems that the questionnaire was not actually followed. If so, then that should be explained in a line after this, because that doesn't involve the truth of this line. [[User:Silver seren|Silver]][[User talk:Silver seren|seren]][[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]] 17:56, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
The questionairre was created by myself with Blindsights input and I personally handed them out and collected them, the name "Great canadian fur con" won out in the polls, but because it was ssmall marging of 2, there was a vote put to the names of the two winners and Furnal Equinox was chosen.

Furnal Equinox was not a name that was created and then used right away, it went through the questionairre like all the other names and was voted on at the end because of the small win margin between Great canadian fur con and Furnal Equinox.

-Shane

:It's agreed that forum discussions lead to the convention, but the financial resources were available prior to that.

:The forum they took place on was Ontario Furries. And the originator of the discussion was Dan Skunk. They could be included as they were important contributions to the convention. The person who originated the name was named.

:Adding that the questionaire results were not followed is good.

:[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 18:02, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

::For clarification's sake re: previous examples of Toronto area gatherings... Camp Feral! takes place in Algonquin Provincial Park, three hours north of Toronto. Likewise, C-ACE took place in Ottawa (several hours east of Toronto) during its existence from 2002 to 2007 (its status as a furry convention is outside the scope of this discussion). All take place outside of the area generally defined as the "Greater Toronto Area", or indeed outside the more generous "Golden Horseshoe". I should note that Feli was a key player at C-ACE - according to this site, even a co-chair! - so I'd definitely defer to his word above.

::With regards to the questionnaire... while it did take place, the results were taken in an advisory manner and the final decision on the name was made by the convention committee. (Admittedly, it was close - but history has close calls sometimes!)

::Finally - this is an object of concern, as some parties in this discussion have posted messages from a '''restricted access''' mailing list. The list was intended for discussions among prospective concom (and later, concom outright) take place in a confidential setting. Is there any policy on the citability of private e-mails that haven't been made available to the public? --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 02:18, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

:::The Toronto Furry Area and the Greater Toronto Area are different areas. Toronto Furry includes members from accross Ontario, thus making it incorrect to say FE was the first hotel furry convention. C-ACE started as a furry convention and later changed to a broader theme, hence it was the first hotel furry convention in this area.

:::The decision for the name was not made properly either. It was done over email insted of at a meeting. Quorum was not present, and it was declared decided with only 2 votes out of the 4 members that responded and 8 members on the mailing list. It would be more correct to say the chairman chose the name.

:::As long as you're not going to deliberately present false information, I won't contest it nor cite private emails to support it. You made a strong suggestion that the results of the survey decided the name of the convention, which was not true. Also, your own members are citing this information.

:::Do you have some proof that the concom was not really a concom? It was called such and they worked together to organize a convention. This assertion also contradicts your previous messages in this page.

:::[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 11:44, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

For the record, toronto furries, existed way before danskunk ever showed up in the fandom locally, I can back up this fact, having been part of the local group since 1996 and Danskunk didn't show up till 2006-2008 or so. - Shane(ChronosWolf)

:How is that relevant?

:[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 11:44, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Danskunk has no interest in showing facts or making good light of the con, as he is making clear on his livejournal, now asking people to boycott FE. He has and continues to be nothing more then a hassle to the FE convention and the people who run it and attend it.

Livejournal post - http://danskunk.livejournal.com/126932.html

-Shane

:My aim is to present an accurate light of the convention, neither good nor bad.

:If you want to contest facts, do so and cite sources to prove them.

:If you would like to include the boycott in the article, that's fine, but I don't think it's necessary.

:[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 11:44, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

== Info ==

Danskunk was removed from the concom for the reasons that were given, it was a unanimous vote, even from the people who supported him. That's all there is to it.

Danskunk was given appropriate credit in the conbook for his involvement and that was all he was due. This whole issue is with Dan having claimed many times to be "THE FOUNDER" of the convention, when a toronto convention has been talked about way before Danskunk showed up. Danskunk refuses to see facts and wants as much credit as possible for everything he did. He makes claims that he put in "hundereds of hours and hundreds of dollars". When does take a bus ride once in awhile constitute as "hundreds"?

Before people read this or other stuff and try to put together an "idea" of what happened, gather the "FACTS" from both parties and then deal with it, when your biased on one side or to one person, you never fully listen to the truth. - Shane Nicholson

I thank you for the information, and i have reached my conclusion on the issue. Thank you for bringing light to this.

-Black Mage

About 8 visits to Toronto, bus and train fairs, and lunches. is where the cost came from. I look at a number of different hotels and convention centres.

People had talked about a convention in Toronto before I was here. I was the first to announce it was actually going to happen after finding people that would fincance it and finding a venue.

I've added a controversy section to the page, same as the one on Dan Skunk's person page, as it should be more relevant here.

Maybe we could just add what claims and counter claims are relevant there.

[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 19:15, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

The actual contributions I made, have been supported with archived email list messages, and appear to have come consensus.

Why don't we add that to the origins section, removing some of the controversy?

[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 19:30, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Date of announcement contested:

"Furnal Equinox was formally announced to the world on July 1 (Canada Day), 2009. http://www.furnalequinox.com/FAQ , Furnal Equinox website (accessed 14 July 2010)"

Actually took place on December 27, 2008, on the Toronto Furry mailing list:

http://mailman.catsden.net/mailman/private/torfur/Week-of-Mon-20081222/004292.html

"We had a lot of discussion about it here before, but we now have someone
that has 5 thousand dollars for it and another that said a few thousand
wouldn't be a problem.

Several people with experience running conventions have expressed interest
in helping run it.

We spend a lot of last night discussing management, finances, and liability.

Looks like it's no longer a question of if it's going to happen, but how
we're going to do it.

I've made a board on the web site we could use to collect ideas and help.

http://www.ontariofurries.ca/index.php?board=22.0

I'd really like to see us come together and support this since people are
going to be putting a lot of effort into it for all of our benefit. "

[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 16:05, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

It was officially announced July 1. What was said on a mailing list didn't count, nor was it the official date, in fact that is stuff involving people who were not even part of the concom at announcement. Date put back.

==Focus==
Scrolling through the huge amount of arguing above, most of it comes across as petty nitpicking. I'm frankly not that interested in the finer details and political in-fighting. The page should be an easy summary of the convention with a nod to what few finer details are relevant. Controversy mentioned only in the most basic sense. (A claims B, X claims Y. And not twenty things - limit it to, I dunno, three.)

You need to FOCUS and agree on RELEVANCY. So: When you post in this discussion, keep it simple. (1) What you want included and mentioned. (2) WHY it's important. (3) Prove it. If you can't prove it, it better be VERY important. (See number 2, but doubly so to make up for it.)

I will say this on the latest nitpick. The December 27, 2008 forum post DanSkunk refers to isn't official: it's decisive in tone. "Okay guys, we've agreed we want a convention, and we want to follow through on it." From what I recall, you didn't have a hotel yet, you hadn't decided on staffing yet... explain please how this is "official"? Compare President Kennedy saying that the United States intends to land a man on the Moon vs. the actual announcement of the people, spacecraft and launch date involved. What's important here - the announcer, or the announcement? How about "The idea had been floating around the Toronto area for over 10 years, and earlier had led to the creation of Feral, but the notion of a local, hotel-based convention gained solidity on the blah-blah forums in December 2008." ?

Let's apply the 1-2-3 thing. (1) Both sides want us to know WHEN the convention was offically announced. And there's disagreement. (2) WHY should we care? DanSkunk, WHY are you making an issue out of it? For the rest of you, WHY is the WHEN issue significant? (3) You've tried to prove it - with a link to a convention FAQ and a link to a forum post. Forum post does not hold up under scrutiny. Note that you all skipped over step 2? See what a mess you're making? FOCUS.

And

stop

double-spacing

your

lines.
[[Special:Contributions/24.77.166.82|24.77.166.82]] 21:59, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

UPDATE: I've moved the controversy to the FE 2010 page, since it's very convention-specific. I've removed the controversy section from Dan Skunk's page, except for one line to acknowledge the debate; it points where to go for the details. I've re-worded the Origin section on the Furnal Equinox page, since that's what got this mess started. Keep the controversy OFF the main Furnal Equinox page; it should be a general introduction to the convention, and nothing more.

As an annoyed third party, I've attempted to be as neutral as possible. I've read through as many of the war-edits as possible to get this summarized neatly and simply, to present the main points of contention and offer both points of view. If you want to make future edits to the controversy, JUSTIFY them in the Talk page.
[[Special:Contributions/24.77.166.82|24.77.166.82]] 23:31, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Changes to Origin were undone. Unless you know the facts of the origin of FE(which so far it seems you don't), don't be changing the origins of the convention. The information provided had nothing to do with FE. Also if you insist on making changes to our con page, then don't do it anonymously.
-Shane Nicholson

What The Fur 2010

2010-07-31T06:15:42Z

Wolfmist:

{{What The Fur}}
'''What The Fur 2010''', the inaugural [[What The Fur]], was held June 4-6 at the Espresso Hotel in [[Wikipedia:Montreal|Montreal, Quebec]], [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]]. The theme was Pirates vs. Ninjas.

As of the end of the closing ceremonies, the attendance at the convention was 228. The number of fursuiters that participated in the parade was 21, however there were approximately 10 additional suiters at the convention that did not participate due to either panels, or being dealers.

The Charity Auction raised a total of $738.60 that will be donated to the [http://www.ecomuseum.ca/ St.Lawrence Valley Natural History Ecomuseum]

A conbook signed by the Guests of Honour, the entire dealers den and the members of the WTF? Staff was also auctioned off at closing ceremoies of the convention, raising more funds for both WTF?'s charity, and for the charity of [[Furnal Equinox]] as well.

== Guests of Honor ==
[[Max Blackrabbit]] and [[gNAW]] were the 2010 [[guests of honor]]. Both artists submitted several pieces of artwork for the convention, and Sponsor Prints. The two t-shirt designs for WTF? 2010 were provided by gNAW.

==Registration==
[[Registration]] opened on October 7, 2009 for attendance, panels and dealer's tables, with the hotel reservations opening on January 3, 2010. Regular memberships cost $30 to $40 Canadian, depending on the time of registration. Sponsors paying $80 to $90 received a t-shirt by [[gNAW]], a breakfast, and will be receiving a limited-edition stitched shirt by mail.

==Events==
Notable panels included:
* Convention Horror Stories by [[Belic]], the current chairman of [[FurFright]]
* History of Furry Fandom by [[Dronon]], and was presented twice, once in English and once in French
* Publishing by [[René Walling]], former chairman of [[Wikipedia:67th_World_Science_Fiction_Convention | Anticipation (Worldcon)]]
* Iron Artist
* Beyond Furry by [[Blindsight]], Chairman of [[Furnal Equinox]]

WTF? kept it's Gaming room and Headless Lounge open for the duration of the weekend.

==2010 Committee==
*'''Chairman:''' [[Feli]]
*'''Operations:''' [[Firebreath]]
*'''Artists, Dealers, Registration:''' [[MAnlantrio]]
*'''Business Liaison, Fursuit Games:''' [[Stripes]]
*'''Programming:''' [[Kildoo Lonewolf]] and [[Lupine Lonewolf]]
*'''Volunters:''' [[Twitchy]]
*'''Gaming:''' [[Foxx]]
*'''Communications:''' [[Zalika]]
*'''Media:''' [[Quail]]
*'''AV and Events Room:''' [[Beekin]]
*'''Masquerade:''' [[Fufu]]
*'''Security:''' [[Arctic]]

==References==
<references />

==External links==
* [http://whatthefur.ca/ What The Fur] - official website
* [http://community.livejournal.com/whatthefur/ WTF? community] at [[LiveJournal]]
* [http://whatthefur.dreamwidth.org/ WTF? community] at [[Dreamwidth]]
* [http://twitter.com/Whatthefur WTF? feed] on [[Twitter]]
* [http://www.facebook.com/reqs.php#/group.php?gid=111987589827 WTF? Community] on [[Facebook]]

[[Category:Conventions]]
[[Category:2010 events]]
[[Category:Quebec]]

[[fr:What The Fur]]

What The Fur 2010

2010-07-31T06:15:02Z

Wolfmist: Edit: Conbook was also signed by the entire dealers den. So Edit was made to add that info.

{{What The Fur}}
'''What The Fur 2010''', the inaugural [[What The Fur]], was held June 4-6 at the Espresso Hotel in [[Wikipedia:Montreal|Montreal, Quebec]], [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]]. The theme was Pirates vs. Ninjas.

As of the end of the closing ceremonies, the attendance at the convention was 228. The number of fursuiters that participated in the parade was 21, however there were approximately 10 additional suiters at the convention that did not participate due to either panels, or being dealers.

The Charity Auction raised a total of $738.60 that will be donated to the [http://www.ecomuseum.ca/ St.Lawrence Valley Natural History Ecomuseum]

A conbook signed by the Guests of Honour, then entire dealers den and the members of the WTF? Staff was also auctioned off at closing ceremoies of the convention, raising more funds for both WTF?'s charity, and for the charity of [[Furnal Equinox]] as well.

== Guests of Honor ==
[[Max Blackrabbit]] and [[gNAW]] were the 2010 [[guests of honor]]. Both artists submitted several pieces of artwork for the convention, and Sponsor Prints. The two t-shirt designs for WTF? 2010 were provided by gNAW.

==Registration==
[[Registration]] opened on October 7, 2009 for attendance, panels and dealer's tables, with the hotel reservations opening on January 3, 2010. Regular memberships cost $30 to $40 Canadian, depending on the time of registration. Sponsors paying $80 to $90 received a t-shirt by [[gNAW]], a breakfast, and will be receiving a limited-edition stitched shirt by mail.

==Events==
Notable panels included:
* Convention Horror Stories by [[Belic]], the current chairman of [[FurFright]]
* History of Furry Fandom by [[Dronon]], and was presented twice, once in English and once in French
* Publishing by [[René Walling]], former chairman of [[Wikipedia:67th_World_Science_Fiction_Convention | Anticipation (Worldcon)]]
* Iron Artist
* Beyond Furry by [[Blindsight]], Chairman of [[Furnal Equinox]]

WTF? kept it's Gaming room and Headless Lounge open for the duration of the weekend.

==2010 Committee==
*'''Chairman:''' [[Feli]]
*'''Operations:''' [[Firebreath]]
*'''Artists, Dealers, Registration:''' [[MAnlantrio]]
*'''Business Liaison, Fursuit Games:''' [[Stripes]]
*'''Programming:''' [[Kildoo Lonewolf]] and [[Lupine Lonewolf]]
*'''Volunters:''' [[Twitchy]]
*'''Gaming:''' [[Foxx]]
*'''Communications:''' [[Zalika]]
*'''Media:''' [[Quail]]
*'''AV and Events Room:''' [[Beekin]]
*'''Masquerade:''' [[Fufu]]
*'''Security:''' [[Arctic]]

==References==
<references />

==External links==
* [http://whatthefur.ca/ What The Fur] - official website
* [http://community.livejournal.com/whatthefur/ WTF? community] at [[LiveJournal]]
* [http://whatthefur.dreamwidth.org/ WTF? community] at [[Dreamwidth]]
* [http://twitter.com/Whatthefur WTF? feed] on [[Twitter]]
* [http://www.facebook.com/reqs.php#/group.php?gid=111987589827 WTF? Community] on [[Facebook]]

[[Category:Conventions]]
[[Category:2010 events]]
[[Category:Quebec]]

[[fr:What The Fur]]

Ontario Furries

2010-07-31T06:11:05Z

Wolfmist: Ontariofurries as the article says, was from 2008-present, not 1998 - present.

'''Ontario Furries''' is a web site created by [[Dan Skunk]] as a successor to the original [[Toronto Furry]] web site which ran from 1998 to 2005 and was reopened by [[Dan Skunk]] in 2006. It opened in November 2008. As of July 2010 it had over 1000 members, making it the most popular Canadian furry web site.

OntarioFurries used to be the premier forums for the ontario furry community, but in the last few months has declined largely due to some issues.
The site features different banners, usually made by local furs, showcasing the skills of local talent.

Administrators of the forums change on an almost regular schedule, due to Danskunk ultimately doing what he thinks is best in the owner/admin areas and usually pushing the other admins to leave, since their actions are sometimes overwritten or totally ignored.

OntarioFurries boasts a large userlist of 1000+ members, while the actualy number of active people is about 200 in total.
The age range of OntarioFurries used to range from 16-45 years of age or older, but has declined mostly to the teenage to early 20's group.

{{Infobox website
| title = Ontariofurries
| image =
| author =
* '''Site Founder:''' [[Dan Skunk]]
* '''Admins''': [[Dan Skunk]], [[Echelon]], [[Xion Bunny]]
| url = http://www.ontariofurries.ca/
*'''Forums''': http://www.ontariofurries.ca/index.php?action=boardindex
*'''IRC''':
**[irc://irc.furnet.org/ontariofurries #OntarioFurries] on [[FurNet (IRC)|FurNet]]
*'''Radio''': http://radio.ontariofurries.ca:8000/listen.pls
| status =
| began = 2008- present:OntarioFurries
| ended = Ongoing
| genre = ?
| rating = ?
}}
[[Category:Ontario]]

Ontario Furries

2010-07-31T06:09:18Z

Wolfmist:

'''Ontario Furries''' is a web site created by [[Dan Skunk]] as a successor to the original [[Toronto Furry]] web site which ran from 1998 to 2005 and was reopened by [[Dan Skunk]] in 2006. It opened in November 2008. As of July 2010 it had over 1000 members, making it the most popular Canadian furry web site.

OntarioFurries used to be the premier forums for the ontario furry community, but in the last few months has declined largely due to some issues.
The site features different banners, usually made by local furs, showcasing the skills of local talent.

Administrators of the forums change on an almost regular schedule, due to Danskunk ultimately doing what he thinks is best in the owner/admin areas and usually pushing the other admins to leave, since their actions are sometimes overwritten or totally ignored.

OntarioFurries boasts a large userlist of 1000+ members, while the actualy number of active people is about 200 in total.
The age range of OntarioFurries used to range from 16-45 years of age or older, but has declined mostly to the teenage to early 20's group.

{{Infobox website
| title = Ontariofurries
| image =
| author =
* '''Site Founder:''' [[Dan Skunk]]
* '''Admins''': [[Dan Skunk]], [[Echelon]], [[Xion Bunny]]
| url = http://www.ontariofurries.ca/
*'''Forums''': http://www.ontariofurries.ca/index.php?action=boardindex
*'''IRC''':
**[irc://irc.furnet.org/ontariofurries #OntarioFurries] on [[FurNet (IRC)|FurNet]]
*'''Radio''': http://radio.ontariofurries.ca:8000/listen.pls
| status =
| began = 1998 - present
| ended = Ongoing
| genre = ?
| rating = ?
}}
{{internet-stub}}
[[Category:Ontario]]

Talk:Dan Skunk and Furnal Equinox

2010-07-31T06:04:45Z

Wolfmist:

That looks better.

There are some inaccuracies though. I didn't ask to leave the board of directors.

It might make more sense to put it in chronological order.

[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 14:57, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

The proper term for what AEO is a "NPO" Non-Profit Organization. - Shane Nicholson

Furnal Equinox

2010-07-31T05:35:25Z

Wolfmist: Undo revision 301374 by Blackmagekitty (Talk)

{{Infobox convention
|name = Furnal Equinox
|logo =
|caption =
| subject = Furry
| location = {{flagdiv|can|[[Wikipedia:Toronto|Toronto]], [[Wikipedia:Ontario|Ontario]], [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]]}}
| url = http://www.furnalequinox.com/
| status = Ongoing
| first = 6-7 March 2010
| final =
| organizer = Anthropomorphic Events of Ontario
| charity =
| resources = {{con resources}}
}}{{Furnal Equinox}}
'''Furnal Equinox''' is a furry [[convention]] held during the month of March in [[Wikipedia:Toronto|Toronto]], [[Wikipedia:Ontario|Ontario]], [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]].

== Origins ==

Despite significant community support, Toronto had not yet hosted a hotel-based furry event. Furnal Equinox was therefore promoted in its first year as "Toronto's First Furry Convention".

Furnal Equinox was formally announced to the world on July 1 (Canada Day), 2009.<ref>''[http://www.furnalequinox.com/FAQ FAQ], Furnal Equinox website (accessed 14 July 2010)</ref>

The name Furnal Equinox was conceived by [[ShiroTora]]. The chosen name plays upon the convention's placement in March during the beginning of spring (the vernal equinox).<ref>''[http://www.furnalequinox.com/About-Us About Us]'', Furnal Equinox website (accessed 14 July 2010)</ref>

== History ==

'''[[Furnal Equinox 2010]]''' took place on March 6-7, 2010 at the Doubletree by Hilton Toronto Airport, attracting 330 attendees - the most for any furry event in Canada up to that point. The guests of honour were [[Heather Bruton]] and [[BushyCat]], and the convention celebrated the theme of "Furry Fun and Games".

'''[[Furnal Equinox 2011]]''' will occur on March 11-13, 2011, returning to the Doubletree Toronto Airport. The Guests of Honour will be [[FirestormSix]] and [[ZEN]], and the convention's theme will be "Wild Magic".

== Staff ==

[[Pakesh De]] and [[Blindsight]] are the current co-chairs of Furnal Equinox.

Others currently involved include [[Aaeden Aranor]], [[Arctic]] (security), [[Arinmal]], [[Arrowroot]] (dealers), [[Kimba]], [[Scani]] (publicity/business), and [[Shane]] (registration/volunteers).

Furnal Equinox is operated by Anthropomorphic Events of Ontario, a not-for-profit corporation in the Province of Ontario.

==References==
<references />

==External links==
*[http://www.furnalequinox.com/ Furnal Equinox website]
*[http://forums.furnalequinox.com/ Furnal Equinox forum]
*[http://community.livejournal.com/furnalequinox/ Furnal Equinox on LiveJournal]
*[http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=165793707559 Furnal Equinox on Facebook]
*[http://twitter.com/furnalequinox Furnal Equinox on Twitter]
* {{con resources}}

{{Conventions}}

[[Category:Conventions]]
[[Category:Toronto]]
[[Category:2010 births]]

User talk:99.229.107.238

2010-07-31T02:17:21Z

Wolfmist:

Black Mage here. If you can, could you send me info about what's happening between you two, via my talk page?I just want to know what the hell's going on.

Info will be posted on the FE forums about this subject. - Shane Nicholson

Furnal Equinox

2010-07-28T16:21:01Z

Wolfmist: Undo revision 301080 by 69.165.138.32 (Talk)

{{Infobox convention
|name = Furnal Equinox
|logo =
|caption =
| subject = Furry
| location = {{flagdiv|can|[[Wikipedia:Toronto|Toronto]], [[Wikipedia:Ontario|Ontario]], [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]]}}
| url = http://www.furnalequinox.com/
| status = Ongoing
| first = 6-7 March 2010
| final =
| organizer = Anthropomorphic Events of Ontario
| charity =
| resources = {{con resources}}
}}{{Furnal Equinox}}
'''Furnal Equinox''' is a furry [[convention]] held during the month of March in [[Wikipedia:Toronto|Toronto]], [[Wikipedia:Ontario|Ontario]], [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]].

== Origins ==

Prior to Furnal Equinox's establishment, the largest gatherings in the [[Toronto Furry|Toronto area]] tended to be larger furmeets such as the [[Islington Furmeet]] and BBQs hosted by [[Potoroo]], which regularly attracted between 50 to 100 people. Despite significant community support, Toronto had not yet hosted a hotel-based furry event. Furnal Equinox was therefore promoted in its first year as "Toronto's First Furry Convention".

The convention originated from discussion on forums in late 2008 and early 2009, bringing together a number of interested individuals and the financial resources to develop a convention committee and the required organization. Furnal Equinox was formally announced to the world on July 1 (Canada Day), 2009.<ref>''[http://www.furnalequinox.com/FAQ FAQ], Furnal Equinox website (accessed 14 July 2010)</ref>

The name Furnal Equinox was conceived by [[ShiroTora]] and was added to a list of names on a questionairre to consider what name was best, these were answered by the local furries at Islington Meet and tallied up later. The chosen name plays upon the convention's placement in March during the beginning of spring (the vernal equinox).<ref>''[http://www.furnalequinox.com/About-Us About Us]'', Furnal Equinox website (accessed 14 July 2010)</ref>

== History ==

'''[[Furnal Equinox 2010]]''' took place on March 6-7, 2010 at the Doubletree by Hilton Toronto Airport, attracting 330 attendees - the most for any furry event in Canada up to that point. The guests of honour were [[Heather Bruton]] and [[BushyCat]], and the convention celebrated the theme of "Furry Fun and Games".

'''[[Furnal Equinox 2011]]''' will occur on March 11-13, 2011, returning to the Doubletree Toronto Airport. The Guests of Honour will be [[FirestormSix]] and [[ZEN]], and the convention's theme will be "Wild Magic".

== Staff ==

[[Pakesh De]] and [[Blindsight]] are the current co-chairs of Furnal Equinox.

Others currently involved include [[Aaeden Aranor]], [[Arctic]] (security), [[Arinmal]], [[Arrowroot]] (dealers), [[Kimba]], [[Scani]] (publicity/business), and [[Shane]] (registration/volunteers).

Furnal Equinox is operated by Anthropomorphic Events of Ontario, a not-for-profit corporation in the Province of Ontario.

==References==
<references />

==External links==
*[http://www.furnalequinox.com/ Furnal Equinox website]
*[http://forums.furnalequinox.com/ Furnal Equinox forum]
*[http://community.livejournal.com/furnalequinox/ Furnal Equinox on LiveJournal]
*[http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=165793707559 Furnal Equinox on Facebook]
*[http://twitter.com/furnalequinox Furnal Equinox on Twitter]
* {{con resources}}

{{Conventions}}

[[Category:Conventions]]
[[Category:Toronto]]
[[Category:2010 births]]

Talk:Furnal Equinox

2010-07-28T06:05:27Z

Wolfmist: /* Relationship with Ontario Furries */

Talk:Furnal Equinox

2010-07-28T05:10:49Z

Wolfmist: /* Meeting Notes */

Furnal Equinox was not created by Danskunk, nor was it created by Ontariofurries and was put together by a committe of people who met on Ontariofurries but that was the extent of it, anything added by or about Danskunk was added by him and are falsifications and lies put into his head by his own self.
:If Dan Skunk was not the founder, can you please provide online evidence of who the real founder is, so this matter can be put to rest? [[User:Silver seren|Silver]][[User talk:Silver seren|seren]][[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]] 17:43, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Members of the committe and con as of First Con in 2010.

Co-Chairs: Blindsight_Wolf
Pakesh_De
Committe: Scani
Shane
Crassadon
ArrowRoot
ArcticFox
Morgan(now Deceased)

There was other people who were involved in the beginning months, they either dropped out, were removed or voted out. As the committee developed and became the current group.

Registered corporate members are: Blindsight_wolf, Scani, Pakesh_de, Shane, Crassadon.
These are people who are registered Directors of the convention. Legally registered on the NPO.

The list of members and concom is available at www.furnalequinox.com and also the original page creator is Scani, so you can also speak with him.

Shane.

: While the list of concom members is not available on Furnal Equinox's website, I can attest that the information Shane has provided is correct for the 2010 concom and can be sourced from our conbook for that year. To reiterate, the claims being made in the article do not reflect Furnal Equinox's stance. I'm open to any questions if desired, though. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 13:28, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

A lot of the source information was removed in 2009 as I removed the Toronto Furry Convention forum from Ontario Furries when it fell into dissuse and hadn't yet created a system to archive deleted posts.

There are a number of people that can corroborate my claim of starting Furnal Equinox, and I could cite some of the early conversations I had with people about the convention from the summer of 2008 but it will be impossible to present anything that can not be contested by Furnal Equinox.

I don't want to be associated with Furnal Equinox and I don't think they want to be associated with me, but I believe the community deserves to have an accurate history of events and that people should be credited for their contributions to the furry community.

As there is likely not going to be a consensus in this situation, the only solution I can see is that we have a section here describing controversy over certain facts and present the differing viewpoints people have on it.

--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 16:55, 18 July 2010

:It's... very unfortunate that a dispute between Dan and FE has been brought into the public eye once again. I don't wish to bring arguments with Dan onto WikiFur, because this is not its purpose for the articles here to be a battleground for the conflicts themselves... only how they're reported, if seen as notable enough to be.
:First of all, I've cleared the "Controversy" section from the article. However, in the interests of good faith, I've copied that section to the bottom of the talk page with two understandings: first, perhaps we can establish a consensus among not just Dan and FE but with the mediation of other WikiFur editors on whether it is needed. Secondly, if there is a consensus that it IS needed, then that section can be collectively edited by not just the stakeholders, but by all in a manner that is satisfactory to all. Personally, I can honestly say that we would rather not see the section there, because it brings forth conflict that, from our evaluation, people would rather just avoid. Moreover, its presence undermines the credibility of both parties.
:However, in the interests of disclosure, this is my understanding of the events that have taken place between Dan and FE (perhaps from a more FE-ish perspective)

:*A Toronto Furry Convention board existed on Ontario Furries from at least late 2008. A number of the current concom members posted on this forum, where a number of ideas were discussed (though no firm decisions re: the planning of the convention as it is taking place now took place as a result - i.e. we did not enter into any contracts with any party, and as the name will suggest, the name Furnal Equinox was not yet decided at this point.)
:*After several months of discussion, a private mailing list was created with the involvement of all those who expressed an interest in serving on the convention committee; their first action was to elect Pakesh De as convention chairman and subsequent decisions such as name, date, and venue were made through here.
:*Anthropomorphic Events of Ontario (AEO) was incorporated as a Ontario corporation without share capital on June 11, 2009. Dan's name was included in the application for incorporation as an initial director.
:*At a meeting of the convention committee on July 20, 2009, Dan was dismissed from Furnal Equinox's concom by a unanimous vote. His actions were perceived as progressively more erratic and independent of the direction the remainder of concom was taking (I refer to it as "we were moving left and he was moving right"), and the consensus was that his removal was in the best interests of the convention's success. He requested to be dismissed from being a director, due to not wanting to be exposed to the convention's liability anymore. This request was granted.
:*Following his removal, Dan expressed his displeasure in a number of ways, engaging in a great deal of public criticism of the convention on Ontario Furries. These criticisms were seen as highly counterproductive, an attempt to erode public confidence in the convention, and evaporated a great deal of goodwill towards him.
:*However, in an attempted gesture of good faith, Dan was mentioned and thanked by name in the conbook for the 2010 convention for his contribution.
:*The relationship between Furnal Equinox and Ontario Furries (the community forum which Dan administrates) has been quite rocky over the past year, and has sometimes been severed altogether to be later restored. However, following the convention in April 2010, Furnal Equinox's subforum on Ontario Furries was deleted without warning. When it became clear that any sort of diplomacy or negotiations to restore the forum would not be successful, the two parties agreed to mutually sever relations.

:It should be noted that I can not attest for any previous research towards the convention Dan may have accomplished. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 23:19, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

"Furnal Equinox was not created by Danskunk, nor was it created by Ontariofurries and was put together by a committe of people who met on Ontariofurries but that was the extent of it, anything added by or about Danskunk was added by him and are falsifications and lies put into his head by his own self."

The committee of people that met on [[Ontario Furries]] were all members of that web site at the time of their meeting; therefore, it would not be inaccurate to say they were Ontario Furries.

Claiming that I am lieing is slanderous. You should back up that claim, or qualify it by saying it's your opinion that they are lies.

Shane became involved the the project later than everyone else and was not involved in those early discussions and has no first hand experience on the events his claims are about.

--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 23:38, 18 July 2010

"He requested to be dismissed from being a director, due to not wanting to be exposed to the convention's liability anymore. This request was granted."

I did not make that request. I discussed it, but decided not to make the request. Had I done so, there would be no displeasure with the decision to remove me from being a director.

Quorum was not present at that meeting, making the decisions against the articles of incorporation. Others dismissed at that meeting were Sparrow and Danruk both of whom were involved in the convention planning prior to creation of the Toronto Furry Convention Board on Ontario Furries and were working with me and supporting my involvement. They were present at the first meetings with hotels, including the one chosen for the convention and instrumental to the success of the convention. None of us were present at this meeting to defend ourselves.

"His actions were perceived as progressively more erratic and independent of the direction the remainder of concom was taking (I refer to it as "we were moving left and he was moving right"), and the consensus was that his removal was in the best interests of the convention's success."

My experience was that being deliberately left out of planning discussions, not being given information I needed to be able to contribute, and being blamed for mistakes others made as a result of this lack of communication to me. My dismissal directly followed my criticism of this behaviour and recommendation that someone else act as chair.

"These criticisms were seen as highly counterproductive, an attempt to erode public confidence in the convention, and evaporated a great deal of goodwill towards him."

This criticism was considered a gesture of goodwill towards the success of the convention, and to prove my value to the success of the convention.

My predictions of wasted and mismanaged space, time, and resources proved to be correct durring the course of the convention. Had my recomendations been acted on, the convention, and it's members, in spite of my removal, would have saved a considerable amount of money. Instead, the recomendations were met with contempt and derision from the convention's remaining organizers.

The wholesale rejection of these recommendations, to me, showed that the success of the convention and service to the community was secondary to the organizers recieving personal recognition for their efforts.

Following the convention, I made public my complaint of unprofessional behaviour and personal prejudice towards me from staff both directly and through convention security after it was dismissed by co-chair, Pakesh De, as personal issues between me and the staff members and not the responsibility of the convention. Something I considered extremely irresponsible and unprofessional.

"It should be noted that I can not attest for any previous research towards the convention Dan may have accomplished."

That research was provided in the initial public discussions for the convention, and in information submitted to the committee after it was formed.

My original desire for contributing to this article was to add the details of Ontario Furries as the location of the forum discussions mentioned and Dan Skunk as the initiator of these discussions. I was, and continue to be the owner of Ontario Furries and it was in this capacity that I created this sub forum after making research into the feasibility of the project. I believe names of contributors and locations where discussions took place to be relevant to an article on the history of the convention. It is obvious that these discussions took place *somewhere* and were started by *someone*. The original organizing committee that created Furnal Equinox was formed through discussion on the Ontario Furries forum through a series of nominations and public voting presented on the forum

If there is contention to these facts, then I assert that this contention then is a relevant part of the history of the convention and that all sides of the contention deserve equal opportunity to present their claims so long as it is made known that these are claims and who is making the claims.

"Personally, I can honestly say that we would rather not see the section there, because it brings forth conflict that, from our evaluation, people would rather just avoid. Moreover, its presence undermines the credibility of both parties."

Wikifur is an encyclopedia which means it should contain factual information presented from a neutral point of view. I believe this means that if there is a dispute over facts, the nature of the dispute should be described in a way that does not attempt to promote either side of the dispute; Wikifurs's purpose is not to promote the credibility of individuals and organizations but inform the fandom of the facts related to them. Facts should not be deliberately omitted to improve the public image of individuals and groups.

In this spirit, I suggest Scani contribute to the proposed section to elaborate on Furnal Equinox's position on the disputed facts unless consensus can be agreed upon.

--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 05:39, 19 July 2010

:''Quorum was not present at that meeting, making the decisions against the articles of incorporation.''
:The assertion that the vote was invalid due to lack of quorum (i.e. a majority of members of the body) is incorrect. While the events in question took place a year ago and are slightly hazy on my part, at the absolute MINIMUM the remaining four directors and/or officers of the convention were present at the time to vote on the matter (which pertained to Dan's removal from concom, as well as from any further staff role with FE. To my recollection, at least five votes were cast; this would be a majority of the concom which consisted of nine members at the time. Moreover, in Ontario, a decision to amend governance would be governed by the corporation's bylaws, not the articles of incorporation. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 12:05, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

::There were 8 committee members at the time. Quorum was decided to be 5 so that there would be a majority. Since there were only 4, then quorum was not reached.

::There could not be 5 votes with only 4 members present.

::I was never made aware of the articles of incorporation or that they were on the application for incorporation.

::I was never made aware of the existence of corporate bi-laws while a director of the corporation.

::I was present for an earlier meeting where it was decided by majority vote that quorum would be 5 to constitute a majority of the 8 members.

::These are only some examples of the unprofessional conduct of members of the committee. While I was a registered director of the corporation, my inquiries into the financial and corporate activities of the corporation were deliberately ignored and I was not informed of decisions being made that affected business of the corporation. My criticism of decisions behind made was strongly discouraged by the chairman ordering me to stop, by insults from committee and staff members, and by being ignored. I was informed by Blindsight that he was asserting his dominance and that I would need to change my behaviour if I wanted to be in the loop.

::--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 00:50, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

:::First of all - I said there were certainly at LEAST four votes, and recall specifically that there were at least five (considering Pak and I recall that Shiro was also present at the meeting). As Shane served in a secretarial role for concom meetings at the time, he would have the record thereof, but I am nonetheless confident that the decision represented the desires of the organization of a whole. While I can understand it being controversial if there had been dissent at the meeting, there was none. This is in line with the purpose of quorum from a moral standpoint (if not a legalistic one) where an unduly small number of people on a governing body do not control the decisions thereof.
:::''I was never made aware of the articles of incorporation or that they were on the application for incorporation.''
:::Your signature was required on the application document, and as far as I know, was obtained at a meeting in early June 2009. Presumably, you would have had the opportunity to review the completed application, which included first directors and "objects of the corporation" at any time while the application was in front of you.
:::I can not speak for these so-called "insults" from concom, but as far as I'm concerned, I did my best to interact with you in good faith, and despite my initial reservations re: your presence, you had every opportunity from me to demonstrate value to us - and I truly believed that because of the quantity of your social network you could be an asset to our operations. Obviously, this did not prove to be the case, and the concom's decision reflected that after several months of working with you.
:::The point I'm trying to make in all of this really has to come down to the group dynamics that worked themselves out. When we first came together, and one of the concerns was coherency. Bringing people together is one thing, but to actually develop some common goals and common purpose is another altogether. A group of people in the same room does not necessarily equal a team. And... regardless of how much work you DID accomplish in the leadup to this, it's another thing to work together, and that impression in your case just wasn't there. People weren't here to just follow your lead. Had you remained present, a lot more friction would have developed, and probably would have had a negative impact on the convention's success. As it turned out... there was a lot of friction anyway. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 12:09, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

::::It was my oversight for not reading through the entire application. We seemed in a hurry to get it done so I just trusted I was already told what was in it.

::::We had a common goal. That was not an issue.

::::I never expected people to follow my lead or anyone else's lead. I expected them to work together as equals. That requires that people communicate their ideas with each other, accept criticism with each other, and make decisions together as a group. Some where not willing to do that, and that's what caused problems.

::::Regardless, my contributions should not be deleted from this article.

::::--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 12:55, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Additional Info: I was a helper to Blindsight at the time and was at the meetings as secreatary and I can attest, after discussions about why to remove Danskunk, the good and bad things he has done for the convention. He was voted out, with Quaorum with a unanimous vote to remove him from the con period.

I may even still have the records as they were transcribed and sent to the list and FE forums that we have of our own.

If Danskunk demands all facts and things should be allowed, then he should freely allow all the "facts" about himself on his wikifur page that pertain to the community and fandom.

Danskunks "Research" was checked out by me and took less then 5 minutes with a quick "wikifur" search, where all his information and research was from.
-Shane Nicholson(WolfMist)

:I accept all facts to be included in this article; any facts that are in dispute should be clearly described as so.

:My research took place over many months of travelling to Toronto to look at possible venues, through discussions with members of the community interested in helping, interviews with people who were directors at other successful conventions, some of it was collected from wikifur, but it was also re-organized to better serve our needs. I also brought observations from many years of attending conventions.

:Shane was not involved in this reasearch.

:--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 01:02, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

It's quite evident that we're not going to reach a consensus on this. Could we start working on editing the proposed section to include what information we all want to provide there?

--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 01:09, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

:Primarily speaking, the parties involved here are FE and you. I'd honestly be more comfortable seeking the opinions of neutral parties if possible, to objectively assess what the value of what you're proposing is - as neither of us will be able to do that. Will this controversy, namely, be important five years down the line?
:Re: the section that was recently added listing 'founding members' - a few of the names asked to withdraw their involvement quite early, and they may object to their appearance here in this article. The list also fails to acknowledge individuals that came on board after founding whose contribution nonetheless played an instrumental role in the convention's success... and I honestly feel they should not be trivialized (people like Morgan, Arrowroot, etc.)
:So I'm not sure if the section as it currently stands is appropriate, but if others say it should, alphabetical would be more appropriate. Perhaps the information is better classified elsewhere, but I'll comment more on that tomorrow. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 03:26, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
::I've made it alphabetical. I didn't know about later joining members. Perhaps we should keep the current list, though rewrite the lead-in to say original founding members and then have a separate sentence listing those that joined in after the fact? They should certainly be recognized.

::And if any of the people listed do not wish their name to be associated with Furnal Equinox, then they just have to speak with Greenreaper and he will take them off and make sure they stay off of the list. [[User:Silver seren|Silver]][[User talk:Silver seren|seren]][[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]] 03:39, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

:::My suggestion would be that if needed, the relevant information be placed in a 'current' and 'former' section in the article (perhaps as a two-column table) - or at least other titles that represent those who are still working on the convention and those who have moved on to other projects. There should be no particular stigma associated with the latter. Also, ref. proposed changes below (you can always refer back to previous edits for previous versions) --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 11:52, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

::::I don't believe a current and former section is necessary. There is already an origins section there which is appropriate to list the original organizers in, describe their contributions, and when and why they left.

::::I sincerly appreciate you acknowledging that the discussions began on Ontario Furries, Scani. If there is consensus on that fact, then I believe it can stand in the origins section where I originally placed it as it is most relevant to that topic. I would also like it stated that I started the conversation there. Another contributer has been contesting both though so it may only be able to stand as a contested fact, but it can be stated the we both support it.

::::I don't believe a description of my removal should be in an Ontario Furries section as it is not relevant to Ontario Furries, but to myself only. My criticism should also not be included there as it was my personal opinion--not that of Ontario Furries.

::::I think we could put it the description of my and Ontario Furries's involvement in the origins section as it is most relevant there. I don't believe either are important enough to warrant their own headlines.

::::I disagree with saying there was a lack of shared direction, as there was a shared direction: producing a convention, a goal which all parties made contributions critical to it's success. The only disagrement was over details of how to accomplish those goals and responsibilities of individual members. I may wish to describe what those were.

::::I also disagree with saying there was a conflict between me and the rest of the concom because that was not true. I had disagreements with only half of the concom. I'd also like it stated that everyone that supported my inclusion was also removed.

::::I'd like to add my own perception of my criticism's as I saw them quite differently.

::::I contest that there was no warning, as I made repeated requests of FE to change their behaviour and would like to add my own assesment of why they were removed.

::::I'll get to adding my revisions later.

::::--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 13:28, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

:::Scani, as long as there is someone that feels the information to be valuable, there is no reason it can not be included. Other parties are free to contribute their knowledge to the article as well, as this is a colaborative effort but no one should be censoring other people's contributions based on their assesment of how valuable they are. Readers should be given the opportunity to have as much information as possible and decide for themselves what is or is not valuable to them.

:::Whether or not someone wishes to be included in the article or not is irrelevant. Deliberately presenting false information, or omitting information for the purpose of manipulating public opinion for any reason is dishonest and against the spirit of wikifur as being a place to present factual information from a neutral perspective.

:::Making the list alphabetical sounds good to me. Thank you.

:::If someone does not want to be associated with Furnal Equinox, it should be added to the article that they do not wish to be associated with it, thusly satisfying their desire for disassociating without sacrificing the integrity of facts. However, I think stating that they resigned, should be enough to indicate their lack of support.

:::--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 12:33, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

== Relationship with Ontario Furries (proposed) ==

Discussion for what became Furnal Equinox originally took place on the [[Ontario Furries]] forum, operated by [[Dan Skunk]]. Though Dan was originally involved in planning discussions, he was removed from the Furnal Equinox organizing committee and board of directors in July 2009 due to lack of shared direction and conflicts between him and the remainder of concom.

Many of Furnal Equinox's concom members have taken the stance that Dan's publicly posted and unsolicited criticisms since his removal have been disproportionately critical of the con and its staff, and negatively affected its reputation. Dan has claimed that his removal was unjustified, and that he has been subjected to negative treatment and insults by other staff members. Both claims are disputed by the other party.

The relationship between members of Furnal Equinox's convention committee and Dan has remained strained, culminating in the removal of Furnal Equinox's subforum and the banning of a number of committee members without warning in April 2010. Currently, Furnal Equinox and Ontario Furries have no formal connections.

Propose addtions to Origins instead of Relationship with Ontario Furries section.

I've been researching more details, so much of the Ontario Furries discussion is redundant.

--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 12:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

== Origins ==

[[Dan Skunk]] was removed from the Furnal Equinox organizing committee and board of directors in July 2009 over disagreements with some of the other committee members. [[M-So]] and [[Danruk]] were also removed on this date.

:[[Dan Skunk]] contests the decision as quorum was not present at this meeting and none of the people removed were given an opportunity to be present to defend themselves. He claims the dismissals were politically motivated because he expressed a lack of confidence in [[Pakesh De]] chairship immediately prior to being removed and that the others removed were friends of his.

:[[Scani]] claims [[Dan Skunk]] was removed over conflicts with other members of the concom and a lack of shared direction and that the decision represented the desires of the organization as a whole.

==Relationship with Ontario Furries==

[[Furnal Equinox]], along with members of the concom, [[Pakesh De]], [[Blindsight]], [[Shane]], [[Chris]] were banned from discussions on [[Ontario Furries]] in April 2010 for repeated insulting and defamitory comments.
:[[Scani]] claims it was without warning.
:Many of Furnal Equinox's concom members have taken the stance that Dan's publicly posted and unsolicited criticisms since his removal have been disproportionately critical of the con and its staff, and negatively affected its reputation.

==Request for Intervention==

This situation has become absolutely ridiculous, and I'm not satisfied with it whatsoever. The changes made by Dan to the article over the past couple of years have resulted in a significant decrease in quality in the article, not to mention a significant shift away from a neutral point of view. The changes that were made can only be described as "self-aggrandizing" and disproportionate to the remainder of the article.

Is it possible for both parties to lay off editing and that another party come in to perhaps arbitrate this issue? This is the continued manifestation of a conflict between Dan and Furnal Equinox - and I really don't feel it's fair for Dan to continue to edit the article unilaterally and play up his importance (just as it wouldn't be fair for us to do likewise). --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 20:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

:I haven't been following this situation that closely but I will offer a couple of observations:
:#If someone is posting information they claim to be true and others dispute it, then one side or the other needs to provide references to back up their claims. If neither side is able to do so, then it reverts to the level of hearsay, and we have to settle for something like "So-and-so claims X but others have disputed this." Also note that any allegedly deleted websites may in fact be preserved at sites such as [http://www.archive.org/web/web.php The Internet Wayback Machine] and those are generally as reliable as the original sites if the material still exists there.
:#We don't need a detailed play-by-play of who said what and what happened when. The only people who care about that level of detail are the handful of people who were directly involved. A summary description is good enough for the other 99% of us, and that's all we need on Wikifur. And it's quite possible that a summary description can be written in a manner that much of the content under dispute doesn't even matter at that level of detail. Try to imagine how you'd summarize something that happened a few years ago, then do it that way.
:I hope this helps. Oh, and here in the talk page, please remember to sign your posts with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). --[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 21:58, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

::I think a few notible points in the development and who was responsible for them is reasonable.

::If someone thinks they're important, and they're factual and referenced, there's no reason for them not to be included.

::It's a fair look at who contributed what in the lead up to the event. If someone happens to have made a lot of contributions, they'll of course be mentioned more. I any case, it's unfair and misleading to remove all reference to someone who made contributions.

::Arbitration is unnecessary, you have the opportunity to add anything that was left out.

::Please refrain from personal attacks, Scani. If you have something to contest, it can be removed as a fact.

::--Dan Skunk 22:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

:::That's more than a few notable points. If you were viewing the article about some other convention that's been running for several years, would you really care to see that level of detail about how it got started, to the level of quotations from the parties involved, assuming you were at most only casually acquainted online with any of the people involved? Most people wouldn't, and I don't think most people do here either. It could be argued that it should be preserved for those with enough historical interest to care, but the main article about the convention here on Wikifur is not the place to do it. (On an unrelated style note, only the first occurrence of each person mentioned in the article should be wikilinked.) --[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 22:34, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

::::I think it would be fine without the quotes, and just a few notes.

::::The name of the forum mentioned and who started the discussion does not seem to be too much to include, as it only adds five words. That's what I find most important and relevant as the section is about origins and that describes where the organization originated, and who it originated from.

::::That was contested and removed, so I did some research and found a reference to it, hence the quote and link backing it up. I could replace the quote with a footnote of where the reference is located.

::::While doing research to find that reference, I found who found the venue and who found the date. Those are at least as notible as who thought of the name, so if originator of the name is included, I think that of the venue and date should be as well.

::::I thought it was interesting to watch how the idea of the convention was developed from another event, and thought that would be interesting to show. I could be included in a seperate page though describing a timeline for those so interested to view it without hindering the conciseness of the main article. I could also do that without offering all the quotes, but rather references to them.

::::Linking only the first occurance seems reasonable as it makes the article easier to read. I don't understand signing posts with 4 tildes. What does that do? My appologies for being new to wikifur. I had stuff to contribute, especially to my own article, and am learning how to work with people here as I go. Thank you for the help.

::::--Dan Skunk 23:44, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

:::::I apologize for my brusqueness earlier - this process has been tremendously frustrating. From my own personal opinion, the edits which added comments such as "Dan Skunk... made the first visit", "Dan Skunk created a board..." and "Dan Skunk promoted having the convention..." in rapid succession, especially considering the edits were made by Dan, did come across in a very self-promotional manner and rubbed me the wrong way. A significant number of Dan's edits since this issue have had something to do with attributing foundation to Furnal Equinox to Dan and his website, Ontario Furries.
:::::I perceive the basic issue at hand to be "how much credit should be given to Dan Skunk for the establishment of Furnal Equinox in this article". This is also not a fight about "contesting" material; the ideal solution would be an article that is acceptable to both parties, and... well, the unsolicited edits to the page certainly breached my understanding that was something that could be worked towards. Not only one that is based in fact but one that is fair, neutral, and NOT an attempt to dig up dirt. I left a message asking for arbitration because it did not seem possible to do this.
:::::The question, too, is what proportion of recognition is appropriate. A project such as running a convention is collective, not individual. There are a lot of people who saw this work to completion, and I don't think it's appropriate to throw them in the background so that one person can come forth unilaterally and say "I did this and this." Moreover, who's to say there weren't people who looked into the feasibility of a furry convention in Toronto prior to this? (Yes, I know, citation needed.)
:::::My proposal remains a list of current and former people involved in a concom role in the current 'Staff' section, as well as an acknowledgement that initial discussion took place on Ontario Furries. (Honestly, given an opportunity, I'd like to turn back the clock to 19 May but realize that's not likely.)
:::::For the record, signing a message with four tildes will post your current username (or IP address if you are not logged in), as well as the current date and time. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 04:30, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

::::::Thank you, Scani. I appreciate the appology and forgive that.

::::::I can certainly understand how the edits I made would seem self promotional, especially comming from myself. That's why I was trying to include other names in it as well. I was hoping if someone had something they though should be mentioned about them, that they should add it as well, resolving more of the one sidedness.

::::::Unfortunately, if we are to be honest and neutral, I did contribute a lot of essential information and resources to the convention. To minimize those contributions would be not be honest and neutral.

::::::Scani's proposal.

::::::I think only adding that the discussion took place on Ontairo Furries would be deminishing my contribution. The discussions took place on Ontario Furries, but as is show from the email referenced, those discussions were started by me only after I had gathered the financial resources needed to start the convention.

::::::A more accurate description would be, "After gathering the needed financial resources to start a convention, Dan Skunk, started a discussion on Ontario Furries inviting others to become involved with the project." That will remove the incorrect information that the financial resources were brought together though those discussions. It also shows who initiated the process.

::::::You've mentioned who thought of the name, but if there's anyone, at all, that should be mentioned, it's the person that came up with the idea to start seriously working on the project.

::::::There were others that looked into running a convention Toronto that year. I started looking at venues following the first Islington Furmeet on June 14, 2008. Pyhrra did so as well but he concluded it was not a good time to start one based on economic conditions. M-So did asked me to help him look at venues on November 19, 2008.

::::::M-So and I concluded it was feasible and that we would work together on it.

::::::He should probably be mentioned as founding it as well.

::::::I would certainly prefer to come to a consensus on what to include in the article. But giving my experience with this article, I'm not certain that's possible. You've very diplomatic and professional about things, but you and me are not the only people interested in the article.

::::::We can't turn back time, but we could certainly repair mistakes. If it's something about me, I'm very forgiving. You just need to appologize and undo whatever was wrong.

::::::If it were up to me, I'd have turned back time to December 3, 2008, and not made a post inviting people to help with the convention untill *after* creating an npo and contracting the hotel--thusly completely avoiding this whole controversy and a lot of frustration and heartache to a lot of people.

::::::Thanks for letting me know what the tildes do.

::::::[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 18:59, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Greetings to this thread which is currently growing to become a small editorial if not soon a book with special guest stars.

The current issue is credit where credit is due. Dan claims to have been *the* original creator of the con based on his board, gathering of folks, and even finding a backer. All said and done, but the *idea* which is being missed is the real idea was well over a decade ago when folks like me, benjamin, deuce, hiker, and many other old furs of the fandom groused about a con local to Toronto which then grew to become as we all know as Feral.

Now Dan was there at the start, had done some work, and did indeed find some folks that got together to make a functional convention yes. However personal issues much less other incidents which need not , or should not, need to be bandied about made such a arrangement intolerable and sadly it was a case of *my way or the highway* and the concom voted to remove what was perceived as the greatest trouble with the least amount of gutting of the con. Now and since then the level of anger from said removed party has led to folks in large numbers banned from his board while he continues to attack the con without any feedback from us as being some of the banned folks in question to simply and repeatedly asking to have issues reopened that were voted closed.

That is fair, and all part of being a open and democratic process. The issue is if this is all being done to simply add credit where credit is due then simply what is being told as * dan, danruk, sparrow* were at the start but were voted out after issued arouse should.. note *should* be enough for most folks. Apparently this is NOT the case and thus after many attempts personally to resolve the issue and being rebuffed I had to delegate any talks about Dan to the PR head Scani. I am only posting now after seeing this topic refuses to fall back into a common thread of acceptance with repeated rebuttals of any and all information we can provide. I wish to stay civil and not fall for the supposed * slander* attempts,and btw, slander is a very easy word to misuse and with the stuff being posted on your own board dan by yourself that others are reporting to us, one should be *very* careful when tossing that word around. I accept giving dan, danruk, and sparrow credit for being at the start and getting a few things going certainly. Claiming basically * if it was not for me NONE of this would have happened* is taking credit well into the realm of tooting ones own horn.

IF this is all that is needed, i will ask that any and *all* talk of the convention is simply kept on topic and in more terms of * yes and we thank you but we had to let you go* as in terms of a employee being let go from the company rather then the slant that is being pushed out as if we all sat around in some plotting basement to overthrow folks and thus hijack the whole convention our-self. That is why we voted in concom to have a legal amount, plus the other staff that was around, voted, and revoted just to make sure the vote was open. I have told Dan this, others have told Dan this, and it refuses to simply sink in. The con did not, was not, and with all the bad blood, will not, have anything to do with Dan period. Note this can change if the lopsidedness does stop but alas many have tried and failed to get the point through.

I thank everyone for adding to the topic and folks for trying to make one side see the light. I wish to thank wikifur for letting us post the con and will hope they will be happy to have us stay. I wish to thank Scani for being PR and dealing with this topic with skill, grace, and civility. I wish to thank dan for continuing to claim credit well after the fact, and as is his right, can and will be mentioned as * a founding member* if so wanted, and IF as mentioned earlier, any and all unwarranted comments, attacks, and shenanigans on his side of the boards will cease and desist. one can hardly ask to be listened to and have demands of any sort treated fairly if only one side is playing the game above board..or one hopes it should be both sides playing fair.

Gaia bless and sorry for such a long winded reply.

Pakesh_De

ChairCritter for Furnal Equinox

:I never claimed to be the first person to think of having a convention in Toronto. I even cited other people speaking of it before me to show that. It wasn't however, untill I gathered financial support and sought others to be involved that it came to fruition.

:That fact should be included.

:"my way or the highway"

:I never once made any such demand. Please stop accusing me of it if you can't provide any evidence to support it.

:"That is fair, and all part of being a open and democratic process."

:That's what I actually asked for, and it was asked for, not demanded.

:"...slander is a very easy word to misuse and with the stuff being posted on your own board dan by yourself that others are reporting to us, one should be *very* careful when tossing that word around."

:I can support what I said there with citations. I'll do that as soon as I can for you.

:"Claiming basically * if it was not for me NONE of this would have happened* is taking credit well into the realm of tooting ones own horn."

:I never made that claim either.

:I claimed to have got financial support together and started a discussion on Ontario Furries and supported that claim with a citation that showed nothing more than that.

:If you wish to be fair, as you claim to be, then you should not have a problem with that being included.

:" I wish to thank dan for continuing to claim credit well after the fact, and as is his right, can and will be mentioned as * a founding member* if so wanted, and IF as mentioned earlier, any and all unwarranted comments, attacks, and shenanigans on his side of the boards will cease and desist. one can hardly ask to be listened to and have demands of any sort treated fairly if only one side is playing the game above board..or one hopes it should be both sides playing fair."

:I'm pretty sure wikifur articles were not meant to be used as extortion to silence unwanted criticism from other web sites.

:People saying what you want them to on other web sites should not be a condition of whether something is contested or not.

:Please stop taking my words and infering things from them I never said or meant and making accusations you can't support.

:This is why we have trouble speaking with each other, and why I strongly suggested someone else act as chairman before being fired from FE. If someone like Scani, who as we both agree, has the ability to speak with skill, grace, and civility, were chairman, relations between FE, Ontario Furries and I would probably have never degraded in the first place.

:The first time I banned FE from Ontario Furries, your discussion with me had me wanting to make it permanent. It was Scani's respectful and professional manner and his willingness to take responsibility for problems and solve them that convinced me to give you a second chance. It's unfortunate he isn't able speak for the rest FE.

:[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 03:31, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

::Okay, I'm going to weigh in my opinions. As an outside party, I feel it might be worth it.
::As I can see, OntarioFurries has been mentioned in the description of the convention. Should every mention of it be scrubbed? No. Should they all stay? No. This is why OF has a stub of its own. If references to the involvement need to be said, put them there.
::Dan is mentioned on the page as it is. Please see the above comment regarding OF - All of the same opinions apply.
::The page for Furnal Equinox is to give people interested in finding out about it more information about the event. You need only cite a reference and people can choose to go look for themselves. This is the whole reason citations exist.
::As for the editing war going on: give it a rest folks. The page is good. it has the info. Leave it be for a while. Nothing will be added continuing to say that things are in contention.
::To sum it up one last time: rest the topic and move on. Please? Either leave the article info to the people currently involved with the event, or to outside neutral third parties. Wikifur is not the place for personal grievances. (IMHO, no public forum is)
::[[User:Felinaeus|Feli]] 21:36, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

:::Actually, Ontario Furries was removed as a reference.

:::Other people have been named with a description of their contribution. It's only fair that mine be as well.

:::I did cite a reference, and it was removed as well.

:::Not continuing to remove facts that are not in contention and supported by citation should resolve the debate.

:::People who are currently involved in the event should not control what is said about past members.

:::No, it's not a place for personal grievances, but it should be a place for facts.

:::I was just trying add my involvement in the fandom to the appropriate articles. Only FE keeps trying to remove parts of it.

:::[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 03:31, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Danskunk was officially removed from Concom unanimous vote on 7/20/09

==========================
Removal of Dan from concom and staff. Passed. Unanimous Vote
Dan as Staff. Vote was (4)No - (1)Yes. Failed.
Danruk removed from Concom to staff. Passed. Unanimous Vote.
Sparrow removed. *Pro-Forma* Unanimous.
==========================

Excerpt from the Meeting minutes from the date of the meeting.
He knew of the meeting and didn't show up. As can be seen, he was voted of concom and staff as unanimous.
He was not allowed on as staff on a vote of 4-1. The was a Quorum, as for Danruk and Sparrow, both had not been in contact with the committee members and con in a long time. So they were voted on and removed. This was the same time the "new, current and formal" committee was made. Before this it was done at meetings. Not on the forums.

==Meeting Notes==

Who just went in and edited the original committee list? That was not the original committee at all. I went to actually meetings with them and have notes from them.

[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 04:10, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
:Both you and the other user have stated to have copies of the meeting notes that verifies their own argument. However, neither of you have produced visible evidence of these notes as proof for your argument. Could both of you please upload them so that we can view them? [[User:Silver seren|Silver]][[User talk:Silver seren|seren]][[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]] 04:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

::Wolfmist just proved my own argument with the notes he posted. How could I, Danruk, and Sparrow be removed if we weren't already members.

::And who was present at that meeting? I'm only aware of 4, and there were 5 votes.

::[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 04:25, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

There was no concrete committe at that time, only the people who were a form of a committee, at that time the NPO wasn't even signed or registered. So it wasn't even a legal corporation at the time.

You three were considered "members" even though you had not been to any meetings or attending anything. In fact you were the only 3 left who hadn't just walked away and made it clear. yet you were never part of anything. As it stands, I have given factual records of what happened, you have yet to prove anything, from you claiming to be a founder or founding committee member, considering there wasn't even a committee at that time, just a gathering of people.

-Shane

:I said members, I said nothing about meeting attendance.

:You even called it a concom in your own notes. There wouldn't be any voting and you wouldn't be calling it a concom if there was no convention committee.

:And the NPO did go through, with my name on it as a director, I have emails saying I was being removed from it. I wasn't trying to include that either.

:[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 04:44, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

It can be called whatever in the notes, the fact is. I and the others know what happened, we have the facts and the proof and all you have is the constant crap you keep adding. For someone who hates the con so much and the people involved, your pretty damn insistent and adamant about taking as much credit for it as possible. You've done nothing for this con, except put it down during the planning and even after the con finished, you made it clear about your dislike and even hatred of the con and the people involved, yet you continue this nonsense to give yourself as much credit as you can. you were give your "Thank you" in the conbook (Which I can also scan and post) and you should be greatful for that much and move on.

It was a hard decision to even give you that small "Credit" after all the negativity you are putting on the convention and the people involved.

Please move on - Shane.

Ontario Furries Expo

2010-07-28T05:03:54Z

Wolfmist: Islington meet is done and over with, original owner still retains meet name.

The '''Islington Furmeet''' is a periodic [[furmeet]] held in the party room of an apartment building in [[Wikipedia:Etobicoke|Etobicoke]] in [[Wikipedia:Toronto|Toronto]], Ontario, Canada. It was originally held by Ki-Wind and Danskunk. Having later been held by Ki-Wind and carious other helpers years later.

The meet usually has dealers tables, a raffle, gaming, movies and other events.
The last Islington Meet was held in June 2010 as the Owner of the meet is moving and thus no longer will the meet be held at it's location, but is moving to a new one.

Since the owner of the meet is moving, Islington Meet is no longer in existance as the meet's name was based on the location.

==External links==
* [http://www.ontariofurries.ca/islingtonfurmeet/ The Islington Furmeet page]

{{event-stub}}
[[Category:Events]]
[[Category:Ontario]]

Toronto Furries

2010-07-28T04:59:54Z

Wolfmist: Created page with ''''Toronto Furries''' or '''"Torfurs"'''. Toronto Furries was originally a forum in ontario hosted at www.torfur.com. It seems to have gone defunct in 2008 and one of the member…'

'''Toronto Furries''' or '''"Torfurs"'''.

Toronto Furries was originally a forum in ontario hosted at www.torfur.com. It seems to have gone defunct in 2008 and one of the members made a new forum called OntarioFurries, where things seem to have stayed.

In 2009, Shane started torfurs.com in an attempt to give people from Ontariofurries another place to go with a more relaxed atmosphere and maturity, it was also created to attempt to bring the toronto furries from the 90's, back into the current generation.

So far it has met with limited success on the forums, but has started to make headway after continuing the "Spaghetti Factory Dinner" Meet, that is held once a month. Slowly bringing back some of the furries locally from the 90's and showing them it's still a great place to be.

They have since moved into creating airbrushed shirts featuring the sites banner and design, created by MUNEKIT, owner of the #CanadianFurs channel, a known local artist and new fursuiter.

Torfurs hopes to bring toronto furries from the 90's and today's generation back into a solid group that it once was. The old torfur.com site is still around, the toronto furries group also has a mailing list, that while seemingly empty, has quite a few people on it, watching, listening and paying attention.

== Links ==
[http://www.torfurs.com Torfurs Forums]

[http://www.ontariofurries.ca OntarioFurries Forums]

[http://mailman.catsden.net/mailman/listinfo/torfur Torfur Mailing List]

Dan Skunk

2010-07-28T04:48:47Z

Wolfmist: /* Fandom involvement */ - Removed the repeat tag, where he says he is a founding member of FE, not the "claims to have" part. Left that alone.

'''Dan Skunk''' (born May 22, 1974)<ref name="DanSkunkLJP">[http://danskunk.livejournal.com/profile Dan Skunk's profile] on [[LiveJournal]]. Retrieved May 15, 2008</ref> is a [[furry]] who lives in [[Wikipedia:Oshawa|Oshawa]], Ontario, Canada.<ref name="DanSkunkLJP"/> Dan Skunk's hobbies include writing poetry.

Dan was a furry from a very young age. Since the age of three, he would daydream about being a [[Skunk (species)|skunk]], and often felt different or wanted to be something else.<ref>[http://www.furnation.com/danskunk/ Dan Skunk's biography] on [[FurNation]]. Retrieved May 15, 2008</ref> He discovered [[furry fandom]] on Tuesday, August 19, 2003, at 10:21 PM, when he watched ''[[Animal Imitators]]'' on TLC and discovered there were others with similar feelings to himself.

== Fandom involvement ==

Dan Skunk is active within the [[Toronto Furry]] group {{fact}}.

The original [[Toronto-furry]] website, which ran was 1998 to late 2005, was reopened by Dan on [[FurNation]] in May, 2006 and grew from 32 members to 400 before it was renamed to [[Ontario Furries]] in 2008. As of July 2010, it had over 1000 members, making it the most popular Canadian furry site.

Dan Skunk created the first chat room for Toronto furs, [[#torfur]] in 2005 as well, then [[#toronto-furry]] in 2006, and [[#OntarioFurries]] in 2008, all on [[FurNet]].

Dan Skunk was a volunteer at [[Anthrocon]] and [[Midwest Furfest]] in 2007, becoming staff from 2008 to present.

Dan Skunk was co-founder and organizer of the Toronto Furry Spaghetti Factory Dinner from 2007 to 2009, Co-Founder of the [[Islington Furmeet]] in 2008.

Dan Skunk claims to have founded [[Furnal Equinox]] because he claims to have been doing research for a possible convention in Toronto, Ontario in the summer of 2008 and then in late 2008 creating a message board on [[Ontario Furries]] for members of the Ontario furry community to discuss the convention and making a post inviting people to to organize and staff it and that this project eventually became known as [[Furnal Equinox]].

This claim is contested by members of [[Furnal Equinox]]'s organizing committee.

==References==
<references/>

==External links==
{{Contributor}}
* [http://www.furaffinity.net/user/danskunk/ Dan Skunk] on [[Fur Affinity]]
* [http://www.furnation.com/danskunk/ Dan Skunk] on [[FurNation]]
* [http://danskunk.livejournal.com/ Dan Skunk] on [[LiveJournal]]

{{person-stub}}
[[Category:People]]
[[Category:Writers]]
[[Category:Poets]]
[[Category:Skunk characters]]
[[Category:Ontario]]
[[Category:1974 births]]

User talk:Wolfmist

2010-07-28T04:45:05Z

Wolfmist: /* = */

Welcome to [[WikiFur]]! Thank you for registering an account - we look forward to working with you. [[Forum:Help desk|Let us know]] if you need any [[Help:Contents|help]] not already provided. If you would like help creating an article or just editing it, don't hesitate to consult the [[Help:Furry Book of Style|Furry Book of Style]] or just contact an [[WikiFur:Administrator|administrator]]. Have a nice day! :-)

Please note that WikiFur is not a place to air personal vendettas or general complaints about individuals. While we do sometimes allow controversial or derogatory information about individuals on WikiFur, there must be a good case for why it is in the public interest of furry fandom that this information be made public, and it must be well-sourced with external references and citations. If it fails to meet these criteria, it doesn't belong on WikiFur. --[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 19:28, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

== Furnal Equinox Meeting Notes ==

Could you please scan the notes into your computer and then upload them, so we can link to them as a reference? With actual evidence of facts like that, it would be concrete if it is supported by a reference link, so that everyone can see it. [[User:Silver seren|Silver]][[User talk:Silver seren|seren]][[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]] 04:10, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Best I can do is post the official meeting notes from our site, as it stands, the computer copy is on the laptop, all notes were transcribed by me from voice recorder, I cannot give a link to the forum section where the notes are, since it's protected from last year.

Straight Copy/Paste from the forum.
Shane.

===================================
Blindsight's Beta
Administrator
Full Member
*****
Posts: 215

View Profile WWW Email Personal Message (Online)

Meeting Minutes - 07/20/09
« on: July 22, 2009, 03:41:36 PM » Reply with quote Modify message Remove message Split Topic
Members attentending meeting.
Meeting officially started at 8:00 p.m.
Crassadon,Pakesh_de,Blindsight,Shane,Scani,ShiroTora.
Meeting officially ended at 9:30 p.m.

Items Voted on
Removal of Dan from concom and staff. Passed. Unanimous Vote
Dan as Staff. Vote was (4)No - (1)Yes. Failed.
Danruk removed from Concom to staff. Passed. Unanimous Vote.
Sparrow removed. *Pro-Forma* Unanimous.
Shane Promoted to Secretary. -=Blindsight Abstained from voting due to conflict of interest.=- Vote was (3)Yes - (1)No. Passed.
1 Week trial for people, accepted by 2 members. Passed.

Room's to book
Halton/Missisauga/End Room.
Aurora room - $350/day
Peel Room - Take it or not? - $700(would have to book tables and chairs)
We take room posessions from 6 a.m. to 6 a.m.

Layout
halton room-zoo/game
a-dealer den
b-event room1
c-event room2
Aurora room-Fur room
$4700/day total
Headless room, stand fans and a cooling unit.(talk to suiters on IRC channels about experiences)
4 foot isles are acceptable for dealers room tables. Crassadon checked into it. 16 Table setup.
Shiro: $70 for full table for weekend, $40 for half table. Artist tables.

Hotel room rate
$129/night - average person might be $139
Crassadon expects $129. - Need to ask if we get any discounts for contracts or room discount for con members.
Rooms are Double Beds.

Directors Roles(assignment & Re-assignment)
Crassadon wanted to do dance and zoo, running. Help with registration at con.
Dance,zoo,masquerade, games co-ordinators needed.
PR Handled by Shiro/Scani as a group.
Scani handles online Stuff. Shiro handles Personal contacts etc.
Proposed Security Chieft contact: ArcticFox/ArcticWolf. Anthrocon staff. Speak to Shiro.
Speak to him about how many radio's to use etc.

Insurance
Insurance carrier needs to be approached and quotes needed for a $500k plan to cover us.
Needs to be 60-90 days before the event for the quote.

Pre-Reg
$35 - Door
$10 - Pre-reg discount?
$25 - 5 month Pre-reg Price

CNTower Usage
The Release form information had nothing that stopped us from using the CNTower logo we had in buttons and shirt.
Sent(Send) to scani to look at.

Music
Crassadon suggested a live band called "Tall Black Girls".

Events
Same events for the non-fursuiters as the fusuiters. People were upset at Anthrocon cause the games were all focused on the fursuiters.
Games need to be brought/purchased for game room. Card/Board/Video Games.
People bring systems etc.
===========================================
:Can't you get a screencap of it from the site? [[User:Silver seren|Silver]][[User talk:Silver seren|seren]][[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]] 04:35, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

[[File:FE7_20_09.jpg]]

ScreenCap as Requested.

-Shane Nicholson

File:FE7 20 09.jpg

2010-07-28T04:43:31Z

Wolfmist: Screencap of Meeting Muntes from FE Board. 2009.

== Summary ==
Screencap of Meeting Muntes from FE Board. 2009.
== Licensing: ==
{{WikiFurNewsFairUse}}

Furnal Equinox

2010-07-28T04:37:09Z

Wolfmist: /* Origins */

{{Infobox convention
|name = Furnal Equinox
|logo =
|caption =
| subject = Furry
| location = {{flagdiv|can|[[Wikipedia:Toronto|Toronto]], [[Wikipedia:Ontario|Ontario]], [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]]}}
| url = http://www.furnalequinox.com/
| status = Ongoing
| first = 6-7 March 2010
| final =
| organizer = Anthropomorphic Events of Ontario
| charity =
| resources = {{con resources}}
}}{{Furnal Equinox}}
'''Furnal Equinox''' is a furry [[convention]] held during the month of March in [[Wikipedia:Toronto|Toronto]], [[Wikipedia:Ontario|Ontario]], [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]].

== Origins ==

Prior to Furnal Equinox's establishment, the largest gatherings in the [[Toronto Furry|Toronto area]] tended to be larger furmeets such as the [[Islington Furmeet]] and BBQs hosted by [[Potoroo]], which regularly attracted between 50 to 100 people. Despite significant community support, Toronto had not yet hosted a hotel-based furry event. Furnal Equinox was therefore promoted in its first year as "Toronto's First Furry Convention".

The convention originated from discussion on forums in late 2008 and early 2009, bringing together a number of interested individuals and the financial resources to develop a convention committee and the required organization. Furnal Equinox was formally announced to the world on July 1 (Canada Day), 2009.<ref>''[http://www.furnalequinox.com/FAQ FAQ], Furnal Equinox website (accessed 14 July 2010)</ref>

The name Furnal Equinox was conceived by [[ShiroTora]] and was added to a list of names on a questionairre to consider what name was best, these were answered by the local furries at Islington Meet and tallied up later. The chosen name plays upon the convention's placement in March during the beginning of spring (the vernal equinox).<ref>''[http://www.furnalequinox.com/About-Us About Us]'', Furnal Equinox website (accessed 14 July 2010)</ref>

== History ==

'''[[Furnal Equinox 2010]]''' took place on March 6-7, 2010 at the Doubletree by Hilton Toronto Airport, attracting 330 attendees - the most for any furry event in Canada up to that point. The guests of honour were [[Heather Bruton]] and [[BushyCat]], and the convention celebrated the theme of "Furry Fun and Games".

'''[[Furnal Equinox 2011]]''' will occur on March 11-13, 2011, returning to the Doubletree Toronto Airport. The Guests of Honour will be [[FirestormSix]] and [[ZEN]], and the convention's theme will be "Wild Magic".

== Staff ==

[[Pakesh De]] and [[Blindsight]] are the current co-chairs of Furnal Equinox.

Others currently involved include [[Aaeden Aranor]], [[Arctic]] (security), [[Arinmal]], [[Arrowroot]] (dealers), [[Kimba]], [[Scani]] (publicity/business), and [[Shane]] (registration/volunteers).

Furnal Equinox is operated by Anthropomorphic Events of Ontario, a not-for-profit corporation in the Province of Ontario.

==References==
<references />

==External links==
*[http://www.furnalequinox.com/ Furnal Equinox website]
*[http://forums.furnalequinox.com/ Furnal Equinox forum]
*[http://community.livejournal.com/furnalequinox/ Furnal Equinox on LiveJournal]
*[http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=165793707559 Furnal Equinox on Facebook]
*[http://twitter.com/furnalequinox Furnal Equinox on Twitter]
* {{con resources}}

{{Conventions}}

[[Category:Conventions]]
[[Category:Toronto]]
[[Category:2010 births]]

Furnal Equinox

2010-07-28T04:36:31Z

Wolfmist: /* Origins */ - Furnal Equinox was not the original name of the convention and was in fact on a questionairre with a few names on it, voted on by the local furry group.

{{Infobox convention
|name = Furnal Equinox
|logo =
|caption =
| subject = Furry
| location = {{flagdiv|can|[[Wikipedia:Toronto|Toronto]], [[Wikipedia:Ontario|Ontario]], [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]]}}
| url = http://www.furnalequinox.com/
| status = Ongoing
| first = 6-7 March 2010
| final =
| organizer = Anthropomorphic Events of Ontario
| charity =
| resources = {{con resources}}
}}{{Furnal Equinox}}
'''Furnal Equinox''' is a furry [[convention]] held during the month of March in [[Wikipedia:Toronto|Toronto]], [[Wikipedia:Ontario|Ontario]], [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]].

== Origins ==

Prior to Furnal Equinox's establishment, the largest gatherings in the [[Toronto Furry|Toronto area]] tended to be larger furmeets such as the [[Islington Furmeet]] and BBQs hosted by [[Potoroo]], which regularly attracted between 50 to 100 people. Despite significant community support, Toronto had not yet hosted a hotel-based furry event. Furnal Equinox was therefore promoted in its first year as "Toronto's First Furry Convention".

The convention originated from discussion on forums in late 2008 and early 2009, bringing together a number of interested individuals and the financial resources to develop a convention committee and the required organization. Furnal Equinox was formally announced to the world on July 1 (Canada Day), 2009.<ref>''[http://www.furnalequinox.com/FAQ FAQ], Furnal Equinox website (accessed 14 July 2010)</ref>

The name Furnal Equinox was conceived by [[ShiroTora]]and was added to a list of names on a questionairre to consider what name was best, these were answered by the local furries at Islington Meet and tallied up later. The chosen name plays upon the convention's placement in March during the beginning of spring (the vernal equinox).<ref>''[http://www.furnalequinox.com/About-Us About Us]'', Furnal Equinox website (accessed 14 July 2010)</ref>

== History ==

'''[[Furnal Equinox 2010]]''' took place on March 6-7, 2010 at the Doubletree by Hilton Toronto Airport, attracting 330 attendees - the most for any furry event in Canada up to that point. The guests of honour were [[Heather Bruton]] and [[BushyCat]], and the convention celebrated the theme of "Furry Fun and Games".

'''[[Furnal Equinox 2011]]''' will occur on March 11-13, 2011, returning to the Doubletree Toronto Airport. The Guests of Honour will be [[FirestormSix]] and [[ZEN]], and the convention's theme will be "Wild Magic".

== Staff ==

[[Pakesh De]] and [[Blindsight]] are the current co-chairs of Furnal Equinox.

Others currently involved include [[Aaeden Aranor]], [[Arctic]] (security), [[Arinmal]], [[Arrowroot]] (dealers), [[Kimba]], [[Scani]] (publicity/business), and [[Shane]] (registration/volunteers).

Furnal Equinox is operated by Anthropomorphic Events of Ontario, a not-for-profit corporation in the Province of Ontario.

==References==
<references />

==External links==
*[http://www.furnalequinox.com/ Furnal Equinox website]
*[http://forums.furnalequinox.com/ Furnal Equinox forum]
*[http://community.livejournal.com/furnalequinox/ Furnal Equinox on LiveJournal]
*[http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=165793707559 Furnal Equinox on Facebook]
*[http://twitter.com/furnalequinox Furnal Equinox on Twitter]
* {{con resources}}

{{Conventions}}

[[Category:Conventions]]
[[Category:Toronto]]
[[Category:2010 births]]

Talk:Furnal Equinox

2010-07-28T04:32:11Z

Wolfmist: /* Meeting Notes */

Furnal Equinox was not created by Danskunk, nor was it created by Ontariofurries and was put together by a committe of people who met on Ontariofurries but that was the extent of it, anything added by or about Danskunk was added by him and are falsifications and lies put into his head by his own self.
:If Dan Skunk was not the founder, can you please provide online evidence of who the real founder is, so this matter can be put to rest? [[User:Silver seren|Silver]][[User talk:Silver seren|seren]][[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]] 17:43, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Members of the committe and con as of First Con in 2010.

Co-Chairs: Blindsight_Wolf
Pakesh_De
Committe: Scani
Shane
Crassadon
ArrowRoot
ArcticFox
Morgan(now Deceased)

There was other people who were involved in the beginning months, they either dropped out, were removed or voted out. As the committee developed and became the current group.

Registered corporate members are: Blindsight_wolf, Scani, Pakesh_de, Shane, Crassadon.
These are people who are registered Directors of the convention. Legally registered on the NPO.

The list of members and concom is available at www.furnalequinox.com and also the original page creator is Scani, so you can also speak with him.

Shane.

: While the list of concom members is not available on Furnal Equinox's website, I can attest that the information Shane has provided is correct for the 2010 concom and can be sourced from our conbook for that year. To reiterate, the claims being made in the article do not reflect Furnal Equinox's stance. I'm open to any questions if desired, though. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 13:28, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

A lot of the source information was removed in 2009 as I removed the Toronto Furry Convention forum from Ontario Furries when it fell into dissuse and hadn't yet created a system to archive deleted posts.

There are a number of people that can corroborate my claim of starting Furnal Equinox, and I could cite some of the early conversations I had with people about the convention from the summer of 2008 but it will be impossible to present anything that can not be contested by Furnal Equinox.

I don't want to be associated with Furnal Equinox and I don't think they want to be associated with me, but I believe the community deserves to have an accurate history of events and that people should be credited for their contributions to the furry community.

As there is likely not going to be a consensus in this situation, the only solution I can see is that we have a section here describing controversy over certain facts and present the differing viewpoints people have on it.

--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 16:55, 18 July 2010

:It's... very unfortunate that a dispute between Dan and FE has been brought into the public eye once again. I don't wish to bring arguments with Dan onto WikiFur, because this is not its purpose for the articles here to be a battleground for the conflicts themselves... only how they're reported, if seen as notable enough to be.
:First of all, I've cleared the "Controversy" section from the article. However, in the interests of good faith, I've copied that section to the bottom of the talk page with two understandings: first, perhaps we can establish a consensus among not just Dan and FE but with the mediation of other WikiFur editors on whether it is needed. Secondly, if there is a consensus that it IS needed, then that section can be collectively edited by not just the stakeholders, but by all in a manner that is satisfactory to all. Personally, I can honestly say that we would rather not see the section there, because it brings forth conflict that, from our evaluation, people would rather just avoid. Moreover, its presence undermines the credibility of both parties.
:However, in the interests of disclosure, this is my understanding of the events that have taken place between Dan and FE (perhaps from a more FE-ish perspective)

:*A Toronto Furry Convention board existed on Ontario Furries from at least late 2008. A number of the current concom members posted on this forum, where a number of ideas were discussed (though no firm decisions re: the planning of the convention as it is taking place now took place as a result - i.e. we did not enter into any contracts with any party, and as the name will suggest, the name Furnal Equinox was not yet decided at this point.)
:*After several months of discussion, a private mailing list was created with the involvement of all those who expressed an interest in serving on the convention committee; their first action was to elect Pakesh De as convention chairman and subsequent decisions such as name, date, and venue were made through here.
:*Anthropomorphic Events of Ontario (AEO) was incorporated as a Ontario corporation without share capital on June 11, 2009. Dan's name was included in the application for incorporation as an initial director.
:*At a meeting of the convention committee on July 20, 2009, Dan was dismissed from Furnal Equinox's concom by a unanimous vote. His actions were perceived as progressively more erratic and independent of the direction the remainder of concom was taking (I refer to it as "we were moving left and he was moving right"), and the consensus was that his removal was in the best interests of the convention's success. He requested to be dismissed from being a director, due to not wanting to be exposed to the convention's liability anymore. This request was granted.
:*Following his removal, Dan expressed his displeasure in a number of ways, engaging in a great deal of public criticism of the convention on Ontario Furries. These criticisms were seen as highly counterproductive, an attempt to erode public confidence in the convention, and evaporated a great deal of goodwill towards him.
:*However, in an attempted gesture of good faith, Dan was mentioned and thanked by name in the conbook for the 2010 convention for his contribution.
:*The relationship between Furnal Equinox and Ontario Furries (the community forum which Dan administrates) has been quite rocky over the past year, and has sometimes been severed altogether to be later restored. However, following the convention in April 2010, Furnal Equinox's subforum on Ontario Furries was deleted without warning. When it became clear that any sort of diplomacy or negotiations to restore the forum would not be successful, the two parties agreed to mutually sever relations.

:It should be noted that I can not attest for any previous research towards the convention Dan may have accomplished. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 23:19, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

"Furnal Equinox was not created by Danskunk, nor was it created by Ontariofurries and was put together by a committe of people who met on Ontariofurries but that was the extent of it, anything added by or about Danskunk was added by him and are falsifications and lies put into his head by his own self."

The committee of people that met on [[Ontario Furries]] were all members of that web site at the time of their meeting; therefore, it would not be inaccurate to say they were Ontario Furries.

Claiming that I am lieing is slanderous. You should back up that claim, or qualify it by saying it's your opinion that they are lies.

Shane became involved the the project later than everyone else and was not involved in those early discussions and has no first hand experience on the events his claims are about.

--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 23:38, 18 July 2010

"He requested to be dismissed from being a director, due to not wanting to be exposed to the convention's liability anymore. This request was granted."

I did not make that request. I discussed it, but decided not to make the request. Had I done so, there would be no displeasure with the decision to remove me from being a director.

Quorum was not present at that meeting, making the decisions against the articles of incorporation. Others dismissed at that meeting were Sparrow and Danruk both of whom were involved in the convention planning prior to creation of the Toronto Furry Convention Board on Ontario Furries and were working with me and supporting my involvement. They were present at the first meetings with hotels, including the one chosen for the convention and instrumental to the success of the convention. None of us were present at this meeting to defend ourselves.

"His actions were perceived as progressively more erratic and independent of the direction the remainder of concom was taking (I refer to it as "we were moving left and he was moving right"), and the consensus was that his removal was in the best interests of the convention's success."

My experience was that being deliberately left out of planning discussions, not being given information I needed to be able to contribute, and being blamed for mistakes others made as a result of this lack of communication to me. My dismissal directly followed my criticism of this behaviour and recommendation that someone else act as chair.

"These criticisms were seen as highly counterproductive, an attempt to erode public confidence in the convention, and evaporated a great deal of goodwill towards him."

This criticism was considered a gesture of goodwill towards the success of the convention, and to prove my value to the success of the convention.

My predictions of wasted and mismanaged space, time, and resources proved to be correct durring the course of the convention. Had my recomendations been acted on, the convention, and it's members, in spite of my removal, would have saved a considerable amount of money. Instead, the recomendations were met with contempt and derision from the convention's remaining organizers.

The wholesale rejection of these recommendations, to me, showed that the success of the convention and service to the community was secondary to the organizers recieving personal recognition for their efforts.

Following the convention, I made public my complaint of unprofessional behaviour and personal prejudice towards me from staff both directly and through convention security after it was dismissed by co-chair, Pakesh De, as personal issues between me and the staff members and not the responsibility of the convention. Something I considered extremely irresponsible and unprofessional.

"It should be noted that I can not attest for any previous research towards the convention Dan may have accomplished."

That research was provided in the initial public discussions for the convention, and in information submitted to the committee after it was formed.

My original desire for contributing to this article was to add the details of Ontario Furries as the location of the forum discussions mentioned and Dan Skunk as the initiator of these discussions. I was, and continue to be the owner of Ontario Furries and it was in this capacity that I created this sub forum after making research into the feasibility of the project. I believe names of contributors and locations where discussions took place to be relevant to an article on the history of the convention. It is obvious that these discussions took place *somewhere* and were started by *someone*. The original organizing committee that created Furnal Equinox was formed through discussion on the Ontario Furries forum through a series of nominations and public voting presented on the forum

If there is contention to these facts, then I assert that this contention then is a relevant part of the history of the convention and that all sides of the contention deserve equal opportunity to present their claims so long as it is made known that these are claims and who is making the claims.

"Personally, I can honestly say that we would rather not see the section there, because it brings forth conflict that, from our evaluation, people would rather just avoid. Moreover, its presence undermines the credibility of both parties."

Wikifur is an encyclopedia which means it should contain factual information presented from a neutral point of view. I believe this means that if there is a dispute over facts, the nature of the dispute should be described in a way that does not attempt to promote either side of the dispute; Wikifurs's purpose is not to promote the credibility of individuals and organizations but inform the fandom of the facts related to them. Facts should not be deliberately omitted to improve the public image of individuals and groups.

In this spirit, I suggest Scani contribute to the proposed section to elaborate on Furnal Equinox's position on the disputed facts unless consensus can be agreed upon.

--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 05:39, 19 July 2010

:''Quorum was not present at that meeting, making the decisions against the articles of incorporation.''
:The assertion that the vote was invalid due to lack of quorum (i.e. a majority of members of the body) is incorrect. While the events in question took place a year ago and are slightly hazy on my part, at the absolute MINIMUM the remaining four directors and/or officers of the convention were present at the time to vote on the matter (which pertained to Dan's removal from concom, as well as from any further staff role with FE. To my recollection, at least five votes were cast; this would be a majority of the concom which consisted of nine members at the time. Moreover, in Ontario, a decision to amend governance would be governed by the corporation's bylaws, not the articles of incorporation. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 12:05, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

::There were 8 committee members at the time. Quorum was decided to be 5 so that there would be a majority. Since there were only 4, then quorum was not reached.

::There could not be 5 votes with only 4 members present.

::I was never made aware of the articles of incorporation or that they were on the application for incorporation.

::I was never made aware of the existence of corporate bi-laws while a director of the corporation.

::I was present for an earlier meeting where it was decided by majority vote that quorum would be 5 to constitute a majority of the 8 members.

::These are only some examples of the unprofessional conduct of members of the committee. While I was a registered director of the corporation, my inquiries into the financial and corporate activities of the corporation were deliberately ignored and I was not informed of decisions being made that affected business of the corporation. My criticism of decisions behind made was strongly discouraged by the chairman ordering me to stop, by insults from committee and staff members, and by being ignored. I was informed by Blindsight that he was asserting his dominance and that I would need to change my behaviour if I wanted to be in the loop.

::--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 00:50, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

:::First of all - I said there were certainly at LEAST four votes, and recall specifically that there were at least five (considering Pak and I recall that Shiro was also present at the meeting). As Shane served in a secretarial role for concom meetings at the time, he would have the record thereof, but I am nonetheless confident that the decision represented the desires of the organization of a whole. While I can understand it being controversial if there had been dissent at the meeting, there was none. This is in line with the purpose of quorum from a moral standpoint (if not a legalistic one) where an unduly small number of people on a governing body do not control the decisions thereof.
:::''I was never made aware of the articles of incorporation or that they were on the application for incorporation.''
:::Your signature was required on the application document, and as far as I know, was obtained at a meeting in early June 2009. Presumably, you would have had the opportunity to review the completed application, which included first directors and "objects of the corporation" at any time while the application was in front of you.
:::I can not speak for these so-called "insults" from concom, but as far as I'm concerned, I did my best to interact with you in good faith, and despite my initial reservations re: your presence, you had every opportunity from me to demonstrate value to us - and I truly believed that because of the quantity of your social network you could be an asset to our operations. Obviously, this did not prove to be the case, and the concom's decision reflected that after several months of working with you.
:::The point I'm trying to make in all of this really has to come down to the group dynamics that worked themselves out. When we first came together, and one of the concerns was coherency. Bringing people together is one thing, but to actually develop some common goals and common purpose is another altogether. A group of people in the same room does not necessarily equal a team. And... regardless of how much work you DID accomplish in the leadup to this, it's another thing to work together, and that impression in your case just wasn't there. People weren't here to just follow your lead. Had you remained present, a lot more friction would have developed, and probably would have had a negative impact on the convention's success. As it turned out... there was a lot of friction anyway. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 12:09, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

::::It was my oversight for not reading through the entire application. We seemed in a hurry to get it done so I just trusted I was already told what was in it.

::::We had a common goal. That was not an issue.

::::I never expected people to follow my lead or anyone else's lead. I expected them to work together as equals. That requires that people communicate their ideas with each other, accept criticism with each other, and make decisions together as a group. Some where not willing to do that, and that's what caused problems.

::::Regardless, my contributions should not be deleted from this article.

::::--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 12:55, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Additional Info: I was a helper to Blindsight at the time and was at the meetings as secreatary and I can attest, after discussions about why to remove Danskunk, the good and bad things he has done for the convention. He was voted out, with Quaorum with a unanimous vote to remove him from the con period.

I may even still have the records as they were transcribed and sent to the list and FE forums that we have of our own.

If Danskunk demands all facts and things should be allowed, then he should freely allow all the "facts" about himself on his wikifur page that pertain to the community and fandom.

Danskunks "Research" was checked out by me and took less then 5 minutes with a quick "wikifur" search, where all his information and research was from.
-Shane Nicholson(WolfMist)

:I accept all facts to be included in this article; any facts that are in dispute should be clearly described as so.

:My research took place over many months of travelling to Toronto to look at possible venues, through discussions with members of the community interested in helping, interviews with people who were directors at other successful conventions, some of it was collected from wikifur, but it was also re-organized to better serve our needs. I also brought observations from many years of attending conventions.

:Shane was not involved in this reasearch.

:--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 01:02, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

It's quite evident that we're not going to reach a consensus on this. Could we start working on editing the proposed section to include what information we all want to provide there?

--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 01:09, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

:Primarily speaking, the parties involved here are FE and you. I'd honestly be more comfortable seeking the opinions of neutral parties if possible, to objectively assess what the value of what you're proposing is - as neither of us will be able to do that. Will this controversy, namely, be important five years down the line?
:Re: the section that was recently added listing 'founding members' - a few of the names asked to withdraw their involvement quite early, and they may object to their appearance here in this article. The list also fails to acknowledge individuals that came on board after founding whose contribution nonetheless played an instrumental role in the convention's success... and I honestly feel they should not be trivialized (people like Morgan, Arrowroot, etc.)
:So I'm not sure if the section as it currently stands is appropriate, but if others say it should, alphabetical would be more appropriate. Perhaps the information is better classified elsewhere, but I'll comment more on that tomorrow. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 03:26, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
::I've made it alphabetical. I didn't know about later joining members. Perhaps we should keep the current list, though rewrite the lead-in to say original founding members and then have a separate sentence listing those that joined in after the fact? They should certainly be recognized.

::And if any of the people listed do not wish their name to be associated with Furnal Equinox, then they just have to speak with Greenreaper and he will take them off and make sure they stay off of the list. [[User:Silver seren|Silver]][[User talk:Silver seren|seren]][[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]] 03:39, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

:::My suggestion would be that if needed, the relevant information be placed in a 'current' and 'former' section in the article (perhaps as a two-column table) - or at least other titles that represent those who are still working on the convention and those who have moved on to other projects. There should be no particular stigma associated with the latter. Also, ref. proposed changes below (you can always refer back to previous edits for previous versions) --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 11:52, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

::::I don't believe a current and former section is necessary. There is already an origins section there which is appropriate to list the original organizers in, describe their contributions, and when and why they left.

::::I sincerly appreciate you acknowledging that the discussions began on Ontario Furries, Scani. If there is consensus on that fact, then I believe it can stand in the origins section where I originally placed it as it is most relevant to that topic. I would also like it stated that I started the conversation there. Another contributer has been contesting both though so it may only be able to stand as a contested fact, but it can be stated the we both support it.

::::I don't believe a description of my removal should be in an Ontario Furries section as it is not relevant to Ontario Furries, but to myself only. My criticism should also not be included there as it was my personal opinion--not that of Ontario Furries.

::::I think we could put it the description of my and Ontario Furries's involvement in the origins section as it is most relevant there. I don't believe either are important enough to warrant their own headlines.

::::I disagree with saying there was a lack of shared direction, as there was a shared direction: producing a convention, a goal which all parties made contributions critical to it's success. The only disagrement was over details of how to accomplish those goals and responsibilities of individual members. I may wish to describe what those were.

::::I also disagree with saying there was a conflict between me and the rest of the concom because that was not true. I had disagreements with only half of the concom. I'd also like it stated that everyone that supported my inclusion was also removed.

::::I'd like to add my own perception of my criticism's as I saw them quite differently.

::::I contest that there was no warning, as I made repeated requests of FE to change their behaviour and would like to add my own assesment of why they were removed.

::::I'll get to adding my revisions later.

::::--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 13:28, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

:::Scani, as long as there is someone that feels the information to be valuable, there is no reason it can not be included. Other parties are free to contribute their knowledge to the article as well, as this is a colaborative effort but no one should be censoring other people's contributions based on their assesment of how valuable they are. Readers should be given the opportunity to have as much information as possible and decide for themselves what is or is not valuable to them.

:::Whether or not someone wishes to be included in the article or not is irrelevant. Deliberately presenting false information, or omitting information for the purpose of manipulating public opinion for any reason is dishonest and against the spirit of wikifur as being a place to present factual information from a neutral perspective.

:::Making the list alphabetical sounds good to me. Thank you.

:::If someone does not want to be associated with Furnal Equinox, it should be added to the article that they do not wish to be associated with it, thusly satisfying their desire for disassociating without sacrificing the integrity of facts. However, I think stating that they resigned, should be enough to indicate their lack of support.

:::--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 12:33, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

== Relationship with Ontario Furries (proposed) ==

Discussion for what became Furnal Equinox originally took place on the [[Ontario Furries]] forum, operated by [[Dan Skunk]]. Though Dan was originally involved in planning discussions, he was removed from the Furnal Equinox organizing committee and board of directors in July 2009 due to lack of shared direction and conflicts between him and the remainder of concom.

Many of Furnal Equinox's concom members have taken the stance that Dan's publicly posted and unsolicited criticisms since his removal have been disproportionately critical of the con and its staff, and negatively affected its reputation. Dan has claimed that his removal was unjustified, and that he has been subjected to negative treatment and insults by other staff members. Both claims are disputed by the other party.

The relationship between members of Furnal Equinox's convention committee and Dan has remained strained, culminating in the removal of Furnal Equinox's subforum and the banning of a number of committee members without warning in April 2010. Currently, Furnal Equinox and Ontario Furries have no formal connections.

Propose addtions to Origins instead of Relationship with Ontario Furries section.

I've been researching more details, so much of the Ontario Furries discussion is redundant.

--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 12:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

== Origins ==

[[Dan Skunk]] was removed from the Furnal Equinox organizing committee and board of directors in July 2009 over disagreements with some of the other committee members. [[M-So]] and [[Danruk]] were also removed on this date.

:[[Dan Skunk]] contests the decision as quorum was not present at this meeting and none of the people removed were given an opportunity to be present to defend themselves. He claims the dismissals were politically motivated because he expressed a lack of confidence in [[Pakesh De]] chairship immediately prior to being removed and that the others removed were friends of his.

:[[Scani]] claims [[Dan Skunk]] was removed over conflicts with other members of the concom and a lack of shared direction and that the decision represented the desires of the organization as a whole.

==Relationship with Ontario Furries==

[[Furnal Equinox]], along with members of the concom, [[Pakesh De]], [[Blindsight]], [[Shane]], [[Chris]] were banned from discussions on [[Ontario Furries]] in April 2010 for repeated insulting and defamitory comments.
:[[Scani]] claims it was without warning.
:Many of Furnal Equinox's concom members have taken the stance that Dan's publicly posted and unsolicited criticisms since his removal have been disproportionately critical of the con and its staff, and negatively affected its reputation.

==Request for Intervention==

This situation has become absolutely ridiculous, and I'm not satisfied with it whatsoever. The changes made by Dan to the article over the past couple of years have resulted in a significant decrease in quality in the article, not to mention a significant shift away from a neutral point of view. The changes that were made can only be described as "self-aggrandizing" and disproportionate to the remainder of the article.

Is it possible for both parties to lay off editing and that another party come in to perhaps arbitrate this issue? This is the continued manifestation of a conflict between Dan and Furnal Equinox - and I really don't feel it's fair for Dan to continue to edit the article unilaterally and play up his importance (just as it wouldn't be fair for us to do likewise). --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 20:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

:I haven't been following this situation that closely but I will offer a couple of observations:
:#If someone is posting information they claim to be true and others dispute it, then one side or the other needs to provide references to back up their claims. If neither side is able to do so, then it reverts to the level of hearsay, and we have to settle for something like "So-and-so claims X but others have disputed this." Also note that any allegedly deleted websites may in fact be preserved at sites such as [http://www.archive.org/web/web.php The Internet Wayback Machine] and those are generally as reliable as the original sites if the material still exists there.
:#We don't need a detailed play-by-play of who said what and what happened when. The only people who care about that level of detail are the handful of people who were directly involved. A summary description is good enough for the other 99% of us, and that's all we need on Wikifur. And it's quite possible that a summary description can be written in a manner that much of the content under dispute doesn't even matter at that level of detail. Try to imagine how you'd summarize something that happened a few years ago, then do it that way.
:I hope this helps. Oh, and here in the talk page, please remember to sign your posts with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). --[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 21:58, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

::I think a few notible points in the development and who was responsible for them is reasonable.

::If someone thinks they're important, and they're factual and referenced, there's no reason for them not to be included.

::It's a fair look at who contributed what in the lead up to the event. If someone happens to have made a lot of contributions, they'll of course be mentioned more. I any case, it's unfair and misleading to remove all reference to someone who made contributions.

::Arbitration is unnecessary, you have the opportunity to add anything that was left out.

::Please refrain from personal attacks, Scani. If you have something to contest, it can be removed as a fact.

::--Dan Skunk 22:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

:::That's more than a few notable points. If you were viewing the article about some other convention that's been running for several years, would you really care to see that level of detail about how it got started, to the level of quotations from the parties involved, assuming you were at most only casually acquainted online with any of the people involved? Most people wouldn't, and I don't think most people do here either. It could be argued that it should be preserved for those with enough historical interest to care, but the main article about the convention here on Wikifur is not the place to do it. (On an unrelated style note, only the first occurrence of each person mentioned in the article should be wikilinked.) --[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 22:34, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

::::I think it would be fine without the quotes, and just a few notes.

::::The name of the forum mentioned and who started the discussion does not seem to be too much to include, as it only adds five words. That's what I find most important and relevant as the section is about origins and that describes where the organization originated, and who it originated from.

::::That was contested and removed, so I did some research and found a reference to it, hence the quote and link backing it up. I could replace the quote with a footnote of where the reference is located.

::::While doing research to find that reference, I found who found the venue and who found the date. Those are at least as notible as who thought of the name, so if originator of the name is included, I think that of the venue and date should be as well.

::::I thought it was interesting to watch how the idea of the convention was developed from another event, and thought that would be interesting to show. I could be included in a seperate page though describing a timeline for those so interested to view it without hindering the conciseness of the main article. I could also do that without offering all the quotes, but rather references to them.

::::Linking only the first occurance seems reasonable as it makes the article easier to read. I don't understand signing posts with 4 tildes. What does that do? My appologies for being new to wikifur. I had stuff to contribute, especially to my own article, and am learning how to work with people here as I go. Thank you for the help.

::::--Dan Skunk 23:44, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

:::::I apologize for my brusqueness earlier - this process has been tremendously frustrating. From my own personal opinion, the edits which added comments such as "Dan Skunk... made the first visit", "Dan Skunk created a board..." and "Dan Skunk promoted having the convention..." in rapid succession, especially considering the edits were made by Dan, did come across in a very self-promotional manner and rubbed me the wrong way. A significant number of Dan's edits since this issue have had something to do with attributing foundation to Furnal Equinox to Dan and his website, Ontario Furries.
:::::I perceive the basic issue at hand to be "how much credit should be given to Dan Skunk for the establishment of Furnal Equinox in this article". This is also not a fight about "contesting" material; the ideal solution would be an article that is acceptable to both parties, and... well, the unsolicited edits to the page certainly breached my understanding that was something that could be worked towards. Not only one that is based in fact but one that is fair, neutral, and NOT an attempt to dig up dirt. I left a message asking for arbitration because it did not seem possible to do this.
:::::The question, too, is what proportion of recognition is appropriate. A project such as running a convention is collective, not individual. There are a lot of people who saw this work to completion, and I don't think it's appropriate to throw them in the background so that one person can come forth unilaterally and say "I did this and this." Moreover, who's to say there weren't people who looked into the feasibility of a furry convention in Toronto prior to this? (Yes, I know, citation needed.)
:::::My proposal remains a list of current and former people involved in a concom role in the current 'Staff' section, as well as an acknowledgement that initial discussion took place on Ontario Furries. (Honestly, given an opportunity, I'd like to turn back the clock to 19 May but realize that's not likely.)
:::::For the record, signing a message with four tildes will post your current username (or IP address if you are not logged in), as well as the current date and time. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 04:30, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

::::::Thank you, Scani. I appreciate the appology and forgive that.

::::::I can certainly understand how the edits I made would seem self promotional, especially comming from myself. That's why I was trying to include other names in it as well. I was hoping if someone had something they though should be mentioned about them, that they should add it as well, resolving more of the one sidedness.

::::::Unfortunately, if we are to be honest and neutral, I did contribute a lot of essential information and resources to the convention. To minimize those contributions would be not be honest and neutral.

::::::Scani's proposal.

::::::I think only adding that the discussion took place on Ontairo Furries would be deminishing my contribution. The discussions took place on Ontario Furries, but as is show from the email referenced, those discussions were started by me only after I had gathered the financial resources needed to start the convention.

::::::A more accurate description would be, "After gathering the needed financial resources to start a convention, Dan Skunk, started a discussion on Ontario Furries inviting others to become involved with the project." That will remove the incorrect information that the financial resources were brought together though those discussions. It also shows who initiated the process.

::::::You've mentioned who thought of the name, but if there's anyone, at all, that should be mentioned, it's the person that came up with the idea to start seriously working on the project.

::::::There were others that looked into running a convention Toronto that year. I started looking at venues following the first Islington Furmeet on June 14, 2008. Pyhrra did so as well but he concluded it was not a good time to start one based on economic conditions. M-So did asked me to help him look at venues on November 19, 2008.

::::::M-So and I concluded it was feasible and that we would work together on it.

::::::He should probably be mentioned as founding it as well.

::::::I would certainly prefer to come to a consensus on what to include in the article. But giving my experience with this article, I'm not certain that's possible. You've very diplomatic and professional about things, but you and me are not the only people interested in the article.

::::::We can't turn back time, but we could certainly repair mistakes. If it's something about me, I'm very forgiving. You just need to appologize and undo whatever was wrong.

::::::If it were up to me, I'd have turned back time to December 3, 2008, and not made a post inviting people to help with the convention untill *after* creating an npo and contracting the hotel--thusly completely avoiding this whole controversy and a lot of frustration and heartache to a lot of people.

::::::Thanks for letting me know what the tildes do.

::::::[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 18:59, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Greetings to this thread which is currently growing to become a small editorial if not soon a book with special guest stars.

The current issue is credit where credit is due. Dan claims to have been *the* original creator of the con based on his board, gathering of folks, and even finding a backer. All said and done, but the *idea* which is being missed is the real idea was well over a decade ago when folks like me, benjamin, deuce, hiker, and many other old furs of the fandom groused about a con local to Toronto which then grew to become as we all know as Feral.

Now Dan was there at the start, had done some work, and did indeed find some folks that got together to make a functional convention yes. However personal issues much less other incidents which need not , or should not, need to be bandied about made such a arrangement intolerable and sadly it was a case of *my way or the highway* and the concom voted to remove what was perceived as the greatest trouble with the least amount of gutting of the con. Now and since then the level of anger from said removed party has led to folks in large numbers banned from his board while he continues to attack the con without any feedback from us as being some of the banned folks in question to simply and repeatedly asking to have issues reopened that were voted closed.

That is fair, and all part of being a open and democratic process. The issue is if this is all being done to simply add credit where credit is due then simply what is being told as * dan, danruk, sparrow* were at the start but were voted out after issued arouse should.. note *should* be enough for most folks. Apparently this is NOT the case and thus after many attempts personally to resolve the issue and being rebuffed I had to delegate any talks about Dan to the PR head Scani. I am only posting now after seeing this topic refuses to fall back into a common thread of acceptance with repeated rebuttals of any and all information we can provide. I wish to stay civil and not fall for the supposed * slander* attempts,and btw, slander is a very easy word to misuse and with the stuff being posted on your own board dan by yourself that others are reporting to us, one should be *very* careful when tossing that word around. I accept giving dan, danruk, and sparrow credit for being at the start and getting a few things going certainly. Claiming basically * if it was not for me NONE of this would have happened* is taking credit well into the realm of tooting ones own horn.

IF this is all that is needed, i will ask that any and *all* talk of the convention is simply kept on topic and in more terms of * yes and we thank you but we had to let you go* as in terms of a employee being let go from the company rather then the slant that is being pushed out as if we all sat around in some plotting basement to overthrow folks and thus hijack the whole convention our-self. That is why we voted in concom to have a legal amount, plus the other staff that was around, voted, and revoted just to make sure the vote was open. I have told Dan this, others have told Dan this, and it refuses to simply sink in. The con did not, was not, and with all the bad blood, will not, have anything to do with Dan period. Note this can change if the lopsidedness does stop but alas many have tried and failed to get the point through.

I thank everyone for adding to the topic and folks for trying to make one side see the light. I wish to thank wikifur for letting us post the con and will hope they will be happy to have us stay. I wish to thank Scani for being PR and dealing with this topic with skill, grace, and civility. I wish to thank dan for continuing to claim credit well after the fact, and as is his right, can and will be mentioned as * a founding member* if so wanted, and IF as mentioned earlier, any and all unwarranted comments, attacks, and shenanigans on his side of the boards will cease and desist. one can hardly ask to be listened to and have demands of any sort treated fairly if only one side is playing the game above board..or one hopes it should be both sides playing fair.

Gaia bless and sorry for such a long winded reply.

Pakesh_De

ChairCritter for Furnal Equinox

:I never claimed to be the first person to think of having a convention in Toronto. I even cited other people speaking of it before me to show that. It wasn't however, untill I gathered financial support and sought others to be involved that it came to fruition.

:That fact should be included.

:"my way or the highway"

:I never once made any such demand. Please stop accusing me of it if you can't provide any evidence to support it.

:"That is fair, and all part of being a open and democratic process."

:That's what I actually asked for, and it was asked for, not demanded.

:"...slander is a very easy word to misuse and with the stuff being posted on your own board dan by yourself that others are reporting to us, one should be *very* careful when tossing that word around."

:I can support what I said there with citations. I'll do that as soon as I can for you.

:"Claiming basically * if it was not for me NONE of this would have happened* is taking credit well into the realm of tooting ones own horn."

:I never made that claim either.

:I claimed to have got financial support together and started a discussion on Ontario Furries and supported that claim with a citation that showed nothing more than that.

:If you wish to be fair, as you claim to be, then you should not have a problem with that being included.

:" I wish to thank dan for continuing to claim credit well after the fact, and as is his right, can and will be mentioned as * a founding member* if so wanted, and IF as mentioned earlier, any and all unwarranted comments, attacks, and shenanigans on his side of the boards will cease and desist. one can hardly ask to be listened to and have demands of any sort treated fairly if only one side is playing the game above board..or one hopes it should be both sides playing fair."

:I'm pretty sure wikifur articles were not meant to be used as extortion to silence unwanted criticism from other web sites.

:People saying what you want them to on other web sites should not be a condition of whether something is contested or not.

:Please stop taking my words and infering things from them I never said or meant and making accusations you can't support.

:This is why we have trouble speaking with each other, and why I strongly suggested someone else act as chairman before being fired from FE. If someone like Scani, who as we both agree, has the ability to speak with skill, grace, and civility, were chairman, relations between FE, Ontario Furries and I would probably have never degraded in the first place.

:The first time I banned FE from Ontario Furries, your discussion with me had me wanting to make it permanent. It was Scani's respectful and professional manner and his willingness to take responsibility for problems and solve them that convinced me to give you a second chance. It's unfortunate he isn't able speak for the rest FE.

:[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 03:31, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

::Okay, I'm going to weigh in my opinions. As an outside party, I feel it might be worth it.
::As I can see, OntarioFurries has been mentioned in the description of the convention. Should every mention of it be scrubbed? No. Should they all stay? No. This is why OF has a stub of its own. If references to the involvement need to be said, put them there.
::Dan is mentioned on the page as it is. Please see the above comment regarding OF - All of the same opinions apply.
::The page for Furnal Equinox is to give people interested in finding out about it more information about the event. You need only cite a reference and people can choose to go look for themselves. This is the whole reason citations exist.
::As for the editing war going on: give it a rest folks. The page is good. it has the info. Leave it be for a while. Nothing will be added continuing to say that things are in contention.
::To sum it up one last time: rest the topic and move on. Please? Either leave the article info to the people currently involved with the event, or to outside neutral third parties. Wikifur is not the place for personal grievances. (IMHO, no public forum is)
::[[User:Felinaeus|Feli]] 21:36, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

:::Actually, Ontario Furries was removed as a reference.

:::Other people have been named with a description of their contribution. It's only fair that mine be as well.

:::I did cite a reference, and it was removed as well.

:::Not continuing to remove facts that are not in contention and supported by citation should resolve the debate.

:::People who are currently involved in the event should not control what is said about past members.

:::No, it's not a place for personal grievances, but it should be a place for facts.

:::I was just trying add my involvement in the fandom to the appropriate articles. Only FE keeps trying to remove parts of it.

:::[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 03:31, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Danskunk was officially removed from Concom unanimous vote on 7/20/09

==========================
Removal of Dan from concom and staff. Passed. Unanimous Vote
Dan as Staff. Vote was (4)No - (1)Yes. Failed.
Danruk removed from Concom to staff. Passed. Unanimous Vote.
Sparrow removed. *Pro-Forma* Unanimous.
==========================

Excerpt from the Meeting minutes from the date of the meeting.
He knew of the meeting and didn't show up. As can be seen, he was voted of concom and staff as unanimous.
He was not allowed on as staff on a vote of 4-1. The was a Quorum, as for Danruk and Sparrow, both had not been in contact with the committee members and con in a long time. So they were voted on and removed. This was the same time the "new, current and formal" committee was made. Before this it was done at meetings. Not on the forums.

==Meeting Notes==

Who just went in and edited the original committee list? That was not the original committee at all. I went to actually meetings with them and have notes from them.

[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 04:10, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
:Both you and the other user have stated to have copies of the meeting notes that verifies their own argument. However, neither of you have produced visible evidence of these notes as proof for your argument. Could both of you please upload them so that we can view them? [[User:Silver seren|Silver]][[User talk:Silver seren|seren]][[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]] 04:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

::Wolfmist just proved my own argument with the notes he posted. How could I, Danruk, and Sparrow be removed if we weren't already members.

::And who was present at that meeting? I'm only aware of 4, and there were 5 votes.

::[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 04:25, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

There was no concrete committe at that time, only the people who were a form of a committee, at that time the NPO wasn't even signed or registered. So it wasn't even a legal corporation at the time.

You three were considered "members" even though you had not been to any meetings or attending anything. In fact you were the only 3 left who hadn't just walked away and made it clear. yet you were never part of anything. As it stands, I have given factual records of what happened, you have yet to prove anything, from you claiming to be a founder or founding committee member, considering there wasn't even a committee at that time, just a gathering of people.

Members at the meeting(voting members): blindsight, Pakesh_De, Crassadon, Shiro_Tora & Scani(Via Skype). 5 Members, minus you. That was Quorum. Sparrow and Danruk were not voting members. You chose not to come on your own, you knew the meeting was happening, I was there was aide to Blindsight and secretary. Even if you were there, you could not vote on yourself and thus your vote wasn't needed and it was a unanimous vote and before it's contested, when voting on me to concom, Blindsight abstained due to personal involvement, still Quorum was there and it was done, since you were voted out already.
- Shane.

-Shane

Talk:Furnal Equinox

2010-07-28T04:29:28Z

Wolfmist: /* Meeting Notes */

Furnal Equinox was not created by Danskunk, nor was it created by Ontariofurries and was put together by a committe of people who met on Ontariofurries but that was the extent of it, anything added by or about Danskunk was added by him and are falsifications and lies put into his head by his own self.
:If Dan Skunk was not the founder, can you please provide online evidence of who the real founder is, so this matter can be put to rest? [[User:Silver seren|Silver]][[User talk:Silver seren|seren]][[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]] 17:43, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Members of the committe and con as of First Con in 2010.

Co-Chairs: Blindsight_Wolf
Pakesh_De
Committe: Scani
Shane
Crassadon
ArrowRoot
ArcticFox
Morgan(now Deceased)

There was other people who were involved in the beginning months, they either dropped out, were removed or voted out. As the committee developed and became the current group.

Registered corporate members are: Blindsight_wolf, Scani, Pakesh_de, Shane, Crassadon.
These are people who are registered Directors of the convention. Legally registered on the NPO.

The list of members and concom is available at www.furnalequinox.com and also the original page creator is Scani, so you can also speak with him.

Shane.

: While the list of concom members is not available on Furnal Equinox's website, I can attest that the information Shane has provided is correct for the 2010 concom and can be sourced from our conbook for that year. To reiterate, the claims being made in the article do not reflect Furnal Equinox's stance. I'm open to any questions if desired, though. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 13:28, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

A lot of the source information was removed in 2009 as I removed the Toronto Furry Convention forum from Ontario Furries when it fell into dissuse and hadn't yet created a system to archive deleted posts.

There are a number of people that can corroborate my claim of starting Furnal Equinox, and I could cite some of the early conversations I had with people about the convention from the summer of 2008 but it will be impossible to present anything that can not be contested by Furnal Equinox.

I don't want to be associated with Furnal Equinox and I don't think they want to be associated with me, but I believe the community deserves to have an accurate history of events and that people should be credited for their contributions to the furry community.

As there is likely not going to be a consensus in this situation, the only solution I can see is that we have a section here describing controversy over certain facts and present the differing viewpoints people have on it.

--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 16:55, 18 July 2010

:It's... very unfortunate that a dispute between Dan and FE has been brought into the public eye once again. I don't wish to bring arguments with Dan onto WikiFur, because this is not its purpose for the articles here to be a battleground for the conflicts themselves... only how they're reported, if seen as notable enough to be.
:First of all, I've cleared the "Controversy" section from the article. However, in the interests of good faith, I've copied that section to the bottom of the talk page with two understandings: first, perhaps we can establish a consensus among not just Dan and FE but with the mediation of other WikiFur editors on whether it is needed. Secondly, if there is a consensus that it IS needed, then that section can be collectively edited by not just the stakeholders, but by all in a manner that is satisfactory to all. Personally, I can honestly say that we would rather not see the section there, because it brings forth conflict that, from our evaluation, people would rather just avoid. Moreover, its presence undermines the credibility of both parties.
:However, in the interests of disclosure, this is my understanding of the events that have taken place between Dan and FE (perhaps from a more FE-ish perspective)

:*A Toronto Furry Convention board existed on Ontario Furries from at least late 2008. A number of the current concom members posted on this forum, where a number of ideas were discussed (though no firm decisions re: the planning of the convention as it is taking place now took place as a result - i.e. we did not enter into any contracts with any party, and as the name will suggest, the name Furnal Equinox was not yet decided at this point.)
:*After several months of discussion, a private mailing list was created with the involvement of all those who expressed an interest in serving on the convention committee; their first action was to elect Pakesh De as convention chairman and subsequent decisions such as name, date, and venue were made through here.
:*Anthropomorphic Events of Ontario (AEO) was incorporated as a Ontario corporation without share capital on June 11, 2009. Dan's name was included in the application for incorporation as an initial director.
:*At a meeting of the convention committee on July 20, 2009, Dan was dismissed from Furnal Equinox's concom by a unanimous vote. His actions were perceived as progressively more erratic and independent of the direction the remainder of concom was taking (I refer to it as "we were moving left and he was moving right"), and the consensus was that his removal was in the best interests of the convention's success. He requested to be dismissed from being a director, due to not wanting to be exposed to the convention's liability anymore. This request was granted.
:*Following his removal, Dan expressed his displeasure in a number of ways, engaging in a great deal of public criticism of the convention on Ontario Furries. These criticisms were seen as highly counterproductive, an attempt to erode public confidence in the convention, and evaporated a great deal of goodwill towards him.
:*However, in an attempted gesture of good faith, Dan was mentioned and thanked by name in the conbook for the 2010 convention for his contribution.
:*The relationship between Furnal Equinox and Ontario Furries (the community forum which Dan administrates) has been quite rocky over the past year, and has sometimes been severed altogether to be later restored. However, following the convention in April 2010, Furnal Equinox's subforum on Ontario Furries was deleted without warning. When it became clear that any sort of diplomacy or negotiations to restore the forum would not be successful, the two parties agreed to mutually sever relations.

:It should be noted that I can not attest for any previous research towards the convention Dan may have accomplished. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 23:19, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

"Furnal Equinox was not created by Danskunk, nor was it created by Ontariofurries and was put together by a committe of people who met on Ontariofurries but that was the extent of it, anything added by or about Danskunk was added by him and are falsifications and lies put into his head by his own self."

The committee of people that met on [[Ontario Furries]] were all members of that web site at the time of their meeting; therefore, it would not be inaccurate to say they were Ontario Furries.

Claiming that I am lieing is slanderous. You should back up that claim, or qualify it by saying it's your opinion that they are lies.

Shane became involved the the project later than everyone else and was not involved in those early discussions and has no first hand experience on the events his claims are about.

--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 23:38, 18 July 2010

"He requested to be dismissed from being a director, due to not wanting to be exposed to the convention's liability anymore. This request was granted."

I did not make that request. I discussed it, but decided not to make the request. Had I done so, there would be no displeasure with the decision to remove me from being a director.

Quorum was not present at that meeting, making the decisions against the articles of incorporation. Others dismissed at that meeting were Sparrow and Danruk both of whom were involved in the convention planning prior to creation of the Toronto Furry Convention Board on Ontario Furries and were working with me and supporting my involvement. They were present at the first meetings with hotels, including the one chosen for the convention and instrumental to the success of the convention. None of us were present at this meeting to defend ourselves.

"His actions were perceived as progressively more erratic and independent of the direction the remainder of concom was taking (I refer to it as "we were moving left and he was moving right"), and the consensus was that his removal was in the best interests of the convention's success."

My experience was that being deliberately left out of planning discussions, not being given information I needed to be able to contribute, and being blamed for mistakes others made as a result of this lack of communication to me. My dismissal directly followed my criticism of this behaviour and recommendation that someone else act as chair.

"These criticisms were seen as highly counterproductive, an attempt to erode public confidence in the convention, and evaporated a great deal of goodwill towards him."

This criticism was considered a gesture of goodwill towards the success of the convention, and to prove my value to the success of the convention.

My predictions of wasted and mismanaged space, time, and resources proved to be correct durring the course of the convention. Had my recomendations been acted on, the convention, and it's members, in spite of my removal, would have saved a considerable amount of money. Instead, the recomendations were met with contempt and derision from the convention's remaining organizers.

The wholesale rejection of these recommendations, to me, showed that the success of the convention and service to the community was secondary to the organizers recieving personal recognition for their efforts.

Following the convention, I made public my complaint of unprofessional behaviour and personal prejudice towards me from staff both directly and through convention security after it was dismissed by co-chair, Pakesh De, as personal issues between me and the staff members and not the responsibility of the convention. Something I considered extremely irresponsible and unprofessional.

"It should be noted that I can not attest for any previous research towards the convention Dan may have accomplished."

That research was provided in the initial public discussions for the convention, and in information submitted to the committee after it was formed.

My original desire for contributing to this article was to add the details of Ontario Furries as the location of the forum discussions mentioned and Dan Skunk as the initiator of these discussions. I was, and continue to be the owner of Ontario Furries and it was in this capacity that I created this sub forum after making research into the feasibility of the project. I believe names of contributors and locations where discussions took place to be relevant to an article on the history of the convention. It is obvious that these discussions took place *somewhere* and were started by *someone*. The original organizing committee that created Furnal Equinox was formed through discussion on the Ontario Furries forum through a series of nominations and public voting presented on the forum

If there is contention to these facts, then I assert that this contention then is a relevant part of the history of the convention and that all sides of the contention deserve equal opportunity to present their claims so long as it is made known that these are claims and who is making the claims.

"Personally, I can honestly say that we would rather not see the section there, because it brings forth conflict that, from our evaluation, people would rather just avoid. Moreover, its presence undermines the credibility of both parties."

Wikifur is an encyclopedia which means it should contain factual information presented from a neutral point of view. I believe this means that if there is a dispute over facts, the nature of the dispute should be described in a way that does not attempt to promote either side of the dispute; Wikifurs's purpose is not to promote the credibility of individuals and organizations but inform the fandom of the facts related to them. Facts should not be deliberately omitted to improve the public image of individuals and groups.

In this spirit, I suggest Scani contribute to the proposed section to elaborate on Furnal Equinox's position on the disputed facts unless consensus can be agreed upon.

--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 05:39, 19 July 2010

:''Quorum was not present at that meeting, making the decisions against the articles of incorporation.''
:The assertion that the vote was invalid due to lack of quorum (i.e. a majority of members of the body) is incorrect. While the events in question took place a year ago and are slightly hazy on my part, at the absolute MINIMUM the remaining four directors and/or officers of the convention were present at the time to vote on the matter (which pertained to Dan's removal from concom, as well as from any further staff role with FE. To my recollection, at least five votes were cast; this would be a majority of the concom which consisted of nine members at the time. Moreover, in Ontario, a decision to amend governance would be governed by the corporation's bylaws, not the articles of incorporation. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 12:05, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

::There were 8 committee members at the time. Quorum was decided to be 5 so that there would be a majority. Since there were only 4, then quorum was not reached.

::There could not be 5 votes with only 4 members present.

::I was never made aware of the articles of incorporation or that they were on the application for incorporation.

::I was never made aware of the existence of corporate bi-laws while a director of the corporation.

::I was present for an earlier meeting where it was decided by majority vote that quorum would be 5 to constitute a majority of the 8 members.

::These are only some examples of the unprofessional conduct of members of the committee. While I was a registered director of the corporation, my inquiries into the financial and corporate activities of the corporation were deliberately ignored and I was not informed of decisions being made that affected business of the corporation. My criticism of decisions behind made was strongly discouraged by the chairman ordering me to stop, by insults from committee and staff members, and by being ignored. I was informed by Blindsight that he was asserting his dominance and that I would need to change my behaviour if I wanted to be in the loop.

::--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 00:50, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

:::First of all - I said there were certainly at LEAST four votes, and recall specifically that there were at least five (considering Pak and I recall that Shiro was also present at the meeting). As Shane served in a secretarial role for concom meetings at the time, he would have the record thereof, but I am nonetheless confident that the decision represented the desires of the organization of a whole. While I can understand it being controversial if there had been dissent at the meeting, there was none. This is in line with the purpose of quorum from a moral standpoint (if not a legalistic one) where an unduly small number of people on a governing body do not control the decisions thereof.
:::''I was never made aware of the articles of incorporation or that they were on the application for incorporation.''
:::Your signature was required on the application document, and as far as I know, was obtained at a meeting in early June 2009. Presumably, you would have had the opportunity to review the completed application, which included first directors and "objects of the corporation" at any time while the application was in front of you.
:::I can not speak for these so-called "insults" from concom, but as far as I'm concerned, I did my best to interact with you in good faith, and despite my initial reservations re: your presence, you had every opportunity from me to demonstrate value to us - and I truly believed that because of the quantity of your social network you could be an asset to our operations. Obviously, this did not prove to be the case, and the concom's decision reflected that after several months of working with you.
:::The point I'm trying to make in all of this really has to come down to the group dynamics that worked themselves out. When we first came together, and one of the concerns was coherency. Bringing people together is one thing, but to actually develop some common goals and common purpose is another altogether. A group of people in the same room does not necessarily equal a team. And... regardless of how much work you DID accomplish in the leadup to this, it's another thing to work together, and that impression in your case just wasn't there. People weren't here to just follow your lead. Had you remained present, a lot more friction would have developed, and probably would have had a negative impact on the convention's success. As it turned out... there was a lot of friction anyway. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 12:09, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

::::It was my oversight for not reading through the entire application. We seemed in a hurry to get it done so I just trusted I was already told what was in it.

::::We had a common goal. That was not an issue.

::::I never expected people to follow my lead or anyone else's lead. I expected them to work together as equals. That requires that people communicate their ideas with each other, accept criticism with each other, and make decisions together as a group. Some where not willing to do that, and that's what caused problems.

::::Regardless, my contributions should not be deleted from this article.

::::--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 12:55, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Additional Info: I was a helper to Blindsight at the time and was at the meetings as secreatary and I can attest, after discussions about why to remove Danskunk, the good and bad things he has done for the convention. He was voted out, with Quaorum with a unanimous vote to remove him from the con period.

I may even still have the records as they were transcribed and sent to the list and FE forums that we have of our own.

If Danskunk demands all facts and things should be allowed, then he should freely allow all the "facts" about himself on his wikifur page that pertain to the community and fandom.

Danskunks "Research" was checked out by me and took less then 5 minutes with a quick "wikifur" search, where all his information and research was from.
-Shane Nicholson(WolfMist)

:I accept all facts to be included in this article; any facts that are in dispute should be clearly described as so.

:My research took place over many months of travelling to Toronto to look at possible venues, through discussions with members of the community interested in helping, interviews with people who were directors at other successful conventions, some of it was collected from wikifur, but it was also re-organized to better serve our needs. I also brought observations from many years of attending conventions.

:Shane was not involved in this reasearch.

:--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 01:02, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

It's quite evident that we're not going to reach a consensus on this. Could we start working on editing the proposed section to include what information we all want to provide there?

--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 01:09, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

:Primarily speaking, the parties involved here are FE and you. I'd honestly be more comfortable seeking the opinions of neutral parties if possible, to objectively assess what the value of what you're proposing is - as neither of us will be able to do that. Will this controversy, namely, be important five years down the line?
:Re: the section that was recently added listing 'founding members' - a few of the names asked to withdraw their involvement quite early, and they may object to their appearance here in this article. The list also fails to acknowledge individuals that came on board after founding whose contribution nonetheless played an instrumental role in the convention's success... and I honestly feel they should not be trivialized (people like Morgan, Arrowroot, etc.)
:So I'm not sure if the section as it currently stands is appropriate, but if others say it should, alphabetical would be more appropriate. Perhaps the information is better classified elsewhere, but I'll comment more on that tomorrow. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 03:26, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
::I've made it alphabetical. I didn't know about later joining members. Perhaps we should keep the current list, though rewrite the lead-in to say original founding members and then have a separate sentence listing those that joined in after the fact? They should certainly be recognized.

::And if any of the people listed do not wish their name to be associated with Furnal Equinox, then they just have to speak with Greenreaper and he will take them off and make sure they stay off of the list. [[User:Silver seren|Silver]][[User talk:Silver seren|seren]][[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]] 03:39, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

:::My suggestion would be that if needed, the relevant information be placed in a 'current' and 'former' section in the article (perhaps as a two-column table) - or at least other titles that represent those who are still working on the convention and those who have moved on to other projects. There should be no particular stigma associated with the latter. Also, ref. proposed changes below (you can always refer back to previous edits for previous versions) --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 11:52, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

::::I don't believe a current and former section is necessary. There is already an origins section there which is appropriate to list the original organizers in, describe their contributions, and when and why they left.

::::I sincerly appreciate you acknowledging that the discussions began on Ontario Furries, Scani. If there is consensus on that fact, then I believe it can stand in the origins section where I originally placed it as it is most relevant to that topic. I would also like it stated that I started the conversation there. Another contributer has been contesting both though so it may only be able to stand as a contested fact, but it can be stated the we both support it.

::::I don't believe a description of my removal should be in an Ontario Furries section as it is not relevant to Ontario Furries, but to myself only. My criticism should also not be included there as it was my personal opinion--not that of Ontario Furries.

::::I think we could put it the description of my and Ontario Furries's involvement in the origins section as it is most relevant there. I don't believe either are important enough to warrant their own headlines.

::::I disagree with saying there was a lack of shared direction, as there was a shared direction: producing a convention, a goal which all parties made contributions critical to it's success. The only disagrement was over details of how to accomplish those goals and responsibilities of individual members. I may wish to describe what those were.

::::I also disagree with saying there was a conflict between me and the rest of the concom because that was not true. I had disagreements with only half of the concom. I'd also like it stated that everyone that supported my inclusion was also removed.

::::I'd like to add my own perception of my criticism's as I saw them quite differently.

::::I contest that there was no warning, as I made repeated requests of FE to change their behaviour and would like to add my own assesment of why they were removed.

::::I'll get to adding my revisions later.

::::--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 13:28, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

:::Scani, as long as there is someone that feels the information to be valuable, there is no reason it can not be included. Other parties are free to contribute their knowledge to the article as well, as this is a colaborative effort but no one should be censoring other people's contributions based on their assesment of how valuable they are. Readers should be given the opportunity to have as much information as possible and decide for themselves what is or is not valuable to them.

:::Whether or not someone wishes to be included in the article or not is irrelevant. Deliberately presenting false information, or omitting information for the purpose of manipulating public opinion for any reason is dishonest and against the spirit of wikifur as being a place to present factual information from a neutral perspective.

:::Making the list alphabetical sounds good to me. Thank you.

:::If someone does not want to be associated with Furnal Equinox, it should be added to the article that they do not wish to be associated with it, thusly satisfying their desire for disassociating without sacrificing the integrity of facts. However, I think stating that they resigned, should be enough to indicate their lack of support.

:::--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 12:33, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

== Relationship with Ontario Furries (proposed) ==

Discussion for what became Furnal Equinox originally took place on the [[Ontario Furries]] forum, operated by [[Dan Skunk]]. Though Dan was originally involved in planning discussions, he was removed from the Furnal Equinox organizing committee and board of directors in July 2009 due to lack of shared direction and conflicts between him and the remainder of concom.

Many of Furnal Equinox's concom members have taken the stance that Dan's publicly posted and unsolicited criticisms since his removal have been disproportionately critical of the con and its staff, and negatively affected its reputation. Dan has claimed that his removal was unjustified, and that he has been subjected to negative treatment and insults by other staff members. Both claims are disputed by the other party.

The relationship between members of Furnal Equinox's convention committee and Dan has remained strained, culminating in the removal of Furnal Equinox's subforum and the banning of a number of committee members without warning in April 2010. Currently, Furnal Equinox and Ontario Furries have no formal connections.

Propose addtions to Origins instead of Relationship with Ontario Furries section.

I've been researching more details, so much of the Ontario Furries discussion is redundant.

--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 12:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

== Origins ==

[[Dan Skunk]] was removed from the Furnal Equinox organizing committee and board of directors in July 2009 over disagreements with some of the other committee members. [[M-So]] and [[Danruk]] were also removed on this date.

:[[Dan Skunk]] contests the decision as quorum was not present at this meeting and none of the people removed were given an opportunity to be present to defend themselves. He claims the dismissals were politically motivated because he expressed a lack of confidence in [[Pakesh De]] chairship immediately prior to being removed and that the others removed were friends of his.

:[[Scani]] claims [[Dan Skunk]] was removed over conflicts with other members of the concom and a lack of shared direction and that the decision represented the desires of the organization as a whole.

==Relationship with Ontario Furries==

[[Furnal Equinox]], along with members of the concom, [[Pakesh De]], [[Blindsight]], [[Shane]], [[Chris]] were banned from discussions on [[Ontario Furries]] in April 2010 for repeated insulting and defamitory comments.
:[[Scani]] claims it was without warning.
:Many of Furnal Equinox's concom members have taken the stance that Dan's publicly posted and unsolicited criticisms since his removal have been disproportionately critical of the con and its staff, and negatively affected its reputation.

==Request for Intervention==

This situation has become absolutely ridiculous, and I'm not satisfied with it whatsoever. The changes made by Dan to the article over the past couple of years have resulted in a significant decrease in quality in the article, not to mention a significant shift away from a neutral point of view. The changes that were made can only be described as "self-aggrandizing" and disproportionate to the remainder of the article.

Is it possible for both parties to lay off editing and that another party come in to perhaps arbitrate this issue? This is the continued manifestation of a conflict between Dan and Furnal Equinox - and I really don't feel it's fair for Dan to continue to edit the article unilaterally and play up his importance (just as it wouldn't be fair for us to do likewise). --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 20:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

:I haven't been following this situation that closely but I will offer a couple of observations:
:#If someone is posting information they claim to be true and others dispute it, then one side or the other needs to provide references to back up their claims. If neither side is able to do so, then it reverts to the level of hearsay, and we have to settle for something like "So-and-so claims X but others have disputed this." Also note that any allegedly deleted websites may in fact be preserved at sites such as [http://www.archive.org/web/web.php The Internet Wayback Machine] and those are generally as reliable as the original sites if the material still exists there.
:#We don't need a detailed play-by-play of who said what and what happened when. The only people who care about that level of detail are the handful of people who were directly involved. A summary description is good enough for the other 99% of us, and that's all we need on Wikifur. And it's quite possible that a summary description can be written in a manner that much of the content under dispute doesn't even matter at that level of detail. Try to imagine how you'd summarize something that happened a few years ago, then do it that way.
:I hope this helps. Oh, and here in the talk page, please remember to sign your posts with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). --[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 21:58, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

::I think a few notible points in the development and who was responsible for them is reasonable.

::If someone thinks they're important, and they're factual and referenced, there's no reason for them not to be included.

::It's a fair look at who contributed what in the lead up to the event. If someone happens to have made a lot of contributions, they'll of course be mentioned more. I any case, it's unfair and misleading to remove all reference to someone who made contributions.

::Arbitration is unnecessary, you have the opportunity to add anything that was left out.

::Please refrain from personal attacks, Scani. If you have something to contest, it can be removed as a fact.

::--Dan Skunk 22:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

:::That's more than a few notable points. If you were viewing the article about some other convention that's been running for several years, would you really care to see that level of detail about how it got started, to the level of quotations from the parties involved, assuming you were at most only casually acquainted online with any of the people involved? Most people wouldn't, and I don't think most people do here either. It could be argued that it should be preserved for those with enough historical interest to care, but the main article about the convention here on Wikifur is not the place to do it. (On an unrelated style note, only the first occurrence of each person mentioned in the article should be wikilinked.) --[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 22:34, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

::::I think it would be fine without the quotes, and just a few notes.

::::The name of the forum mentioned and who started the discussion does not seem to be too much to include, as it only adds five words. That's what I find most important and relevant as the section is about origins and that describes where the organization originated, and who it originated from.

::::That was contested and removed, so I did some research and found a reference to it, hence the quote and link backing it up. I could replace the quote with a footnote of where the reference is located.

::::While doing research to find that reference, I found who found the venue and who found the date. Those are at least as notible as who thought of the name, so if originator of the name is included, I think that of the venue and date should be as well.

::::I thought it was interesting to watch how the idea of the convention was developed from another event, and thought that would be interesting to show. I could be included in a seperate page though describing a timeline for those so interested to view it without hindering the conciseness of the main article. I could also do that without offering all the quotes, but rather references to them.

::::Linking only the first occurance seems reasonable as it makes the article easier to read. I don't understand signing posts with 4 tildes. What does that do? My appologies for being new to wikifur. I had stuff to contribute, especially to my own article, and am learning how to work with people here as I go. Thank you for the help.

::::--Dan Skunk 23:44, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

:::::I apologize for my brusqueness earlier - this process has been tremendously frustrating. From my own personal opinion, the edits which added comments such as "Dan Skunk... made the first visit", "Dan Skunk created a board..." and "Dan Skunk promoted having the convention..." in rapid succession, especially considering the edits were made by Dan, did come across in a very self-promotional manner and rubbed me the wrong way. A significant number of Dan's edits since this issue have had something to do with attributing foundation to Furnal Equinox to Dan and his website, Ontario Furries.
:::::I perceive the basic issue at hand to be "how much credit should be given to Dan Skunk for the establishment of Furnal Equinox in this article". This is also not a fight about "contesting" material; the ideal solution would be an article that is acceptable to both parties, and... well, the unsolicited edits to the page certainly breached my understanding that was something that could be worked towards. Not only one that is based in fact but one that is fair, neutral, and NOT an attempt to dig up dirt. I left a message asking for arbitration because it did not seem possible to do this.
:::::The question, too, is what proportion of recognition is appropriate. A project such as running a convention is collective, not individual. There are a lot of people who saw this work to completion, and I don't think it's appropriate to throw them in the background so that one person can come forth unilaterally and say "I did this and this." Moreover, who's to say there weren't people who looked into the feasibility of a furry convention in Toronto prior to this? (Yes, I know, citation needed.)
:::::My proposal remains a list of current and former people involved in a concom role in the current 'Staff' section, as well as an acknowledgement that initial discussion took place on Ontario Furries. (Honestly, given an opportunity, I'd like to turn back the clock to 19 May but realize that's not likely.)
:::::For the record, signing a message with four tildes will post your current username (or IP address if you are not logged in), as well as the current date and time. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 04:30, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

::::::Thank you, Scani. I appreciate the appology and forgive that.

::::::I can certainly understand how the edits I made would seem self promotional, especially comming from myself. That's why I was trying to include other names in it as well. I was hoping if someone had something they though should be mentioned about them, that they should add it as well, resolving more of the one sidedness.

::::::Unfortunately, if we are to be honest and neutral, I did contribute a lot of essential information and resources to the convention. To minimize those contributions would be not be honest and neutral.

::::::Scani's proposal.

::::::I think only adding that the discussion took place on Ontairo Furries would be deminishing my contribution. The discussions took place on Ontario Furries, but as is show from the email referenced, those discussions were started by me only after I had gathered the financial resources needed to start the convention.

::::::A more accurate description would be, "After gathering the needed financial resources to start a convention, Dan Skunk, started a discussion on Ontario Furries inviting others to become involved with the project." That will remove the incorrect information that the financial resources were brought together though those discussions. It also shows who initiated the process.

::::::You've mentioned who thought of the name, but if there's anyone, at all, that should be mentioned, it's the person that came up with the idea to start seriously working on the project.

::::::There were others that looked into running a convention Toronto that year. I started looking at venues following the first Islington Furmeet on June 14, 2008. Pyhrra did so as well but he concluded it was not a good time to start one based on economic conditions. M-So did asked me to help him look at venues on November 19, 2008.

::::::M-So and I concluded it was feasible and that we would work together on it.

::::::He should probably be mentioned as founding it as well.

::::::I would certainly prefer to come to a consensus on what to include in the article. But giving my experience with this article, I'm not certain that's possible. You've very diplomatic and professional about things, but you and me are not the only people interested in the article.

::::::We can't turn back time, but we could certainly repair mistakes. If it's something about me, I'm very forgiving. You just need to appologize and undo whatever was wrong.

::::::If it were up to me, I'd have turned back time to December 3, 2008, and not made a post inviting people to help with the convention untill *after* creating an npo and contracting the hotel--thusly completely avoiding this whole controversy and a lot of frustration and heartache to a lot of people.

::::::Thanks for letting me know what the tildes do.

::::::[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 18:59, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Greetings to this thread which is currently growing to become a small editorial if not soon a book with special guest stars.

The current issue is credit where credit is due. Dan claims to have been *the* original creator of the con based on his board, gathering of folks, and even finding a backer. All said and done, but the *idea* which is being missed is the real idea was well over a decade ago when folks like me, benjamin, deuce, hiker, and many other old furs of the fandom groused about a con local to Toronto which then grew to become as we all know as Feral.

Now Dan was there at the start, had done some work, and did indeed find some folks that got together to make a functional convention yes. However personal issues much less other incidents which need not , or should not, need to be bandied about made such a arrangement intolerable and sadly it was a case of *my way or the highway* and the concom voted to remove what was perceived as the greatest trouble with the least amount of gutting of the con. Now and since then the level of anger from said removed party has led to folks in large numbers banned from his board while he continues to attack the con without any feedback from us as being some of the banned folks in question to simply and repeatedly asking to have issues reopened that were voted closed.

That is fair, and all part of being a open and democratic process. The issue is if this is all being done to simply add credit where credit is due then simply what is being told as * dan, danruk, sparrow* were at the start but were voted out after issued arouse should.. note *should* be enough for most folks. Apparently this is NOT the case and thus after many attempts personally to resolve the issue and being rebuffed I had to delegate any talks about Dan to the PR head Scani. I am only posting now after seeing this topic refuses to fall back into a common thread of acceptance with repeated rebuttals of any and all information we can provide. I wish to stay civil and not fall for the supposed * slander* attempts,and btw, slander is a very easy word to misuse and with the stuff being posted on your own board dan by yourself that others are reporting to us, one should be *very* careful when tossing that word around. I accept giving dan, danruk, and sparrow credit for being at the start and getting a few things going certainly. Claiming basically * if it was not for me NONE of this would have happened* is taking credit well into the realm of tooting ones own horn.

IF this is all that is needed, i will ask that any and *all* talk of the convention is simply kept on topic and in more terms of * yes and we thank you but we had to let you go* as in terms of a employee being let go from the company rather then the slant that is being pushed out as if we all sat around in some plotting basement to overthrow folks and thus hijack the whole convention our-self. That is why we voted in concom to have a legal amount, plus the other staff that was around, voted, and revoted just to make sure the vote was open. I have told Dan this, others have told Dan this, and it refuses to simply sink in. The con did not, was not, and with all the bad blood, will not, have anything to do with Dan period. Note this can change if the lopsidedness does stop but alas many have tried and failed to get the point through.

I thank everyone for adding to the topic and folks for trying to make one side see the light. I wish to thank wikifur for letting us post the con and will hope they will be happy to have us stay. I wish to thank Scani for being PR and dealing with this topic with skill, grace, and civility. I wish to thank dan for continuing to claim credit well after the fact, and as is his right, can and will be mentioned as * a founding member* if so wanted, and IF as mentioned earlier, any and all unwarranted comments, attacks, and shenanigans on his side of the boards will cease and desist. one can hardly ask to be listened to and have demands of any sort treated fairly if only one side is playing the game above board..or one hopes it should be both sides playing fair.

Gaia bless and sorry for such a long winded reply.

Pakesh_De

ChairCritter for Furnal Equinox

:I never claimed to be the first person to think of having a convention in Toronto. I even cited other people speaking of it before me to show that. It wasn't however, untill I gathered financial support and sought others to be involved that it came to fruition.

:That fact should be included.

:"my way or the highway"

:I never once made any such demand. Please stop accusing me of it if you can't provide any evidence to support it.

:"That is fair, and all part of being a open and democratic process."

:That's what I actually asked for, and it was asked for, not demanded.

:"...slander is a very easy word to misuse and with the stuff being posted on your own board dan by yourself that others are reporting to us, one should be *very* careful when tossing that word around."

:I can support what I said there with citations. I'll do that as soon as I can for you.

:"Claiming basically * if it was not for me NONE of this would have happened* is taking credit well into the realm of tooting ones own horn."

:I never made that claim either.

:I claimed to have got financial support together and started a discussion on Ontario Furries and supported that claim with a citation that showed nothing more than that.

:If you wish to be fair, as you claim to be, then you should not have a problem with that being included.

:" I wish to thank dan for continuing to claim credit well after the fact, and as is his right, can and will be mentioned as * a founding member* if so wanted, and IF as mentioned earlier, any and all unwarranted comments, attacks, and shenanigans on his side of the boards will cease and desist. one can hardly ask to be listened to and have demands of any sort treated fairly if only one side is playing the game above board..or one hopes it should be both sides playing fair."

:I'm pretty sure wikifur articles were not meant to be used as extortion to silence unwanted criticism from other web sites.

:People saying what you want them to on other web sites should not be a condition of whether something is contested or not.

:Please stop taking my words and infering things from them I never said or meant and making accusations you can't support.

:This is why we have trouble speaking with each other, and why I strongly suggested someone else act as chairman before being fired from FE. If someone like Scani, who as we both agree, has the ability to speak with skill, grace, and civility, were chairman, relations between FE, Ontario Furries and I would probably have never degraded in the first place.

:The first time I banned FE from Ontario Furries, your discussion with me had me wanting to make it permanent. It was Scani's respectful and professional manner and his willingness to take responsibility for problems and solve them that convinced me to give you a second chance. It's unfortunate he isn't able speak for the rest FE.

:[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 03:31, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

::Okay, I'm going to weigh in my opinions. As an outside party, I feel it might be worth it.
::As I can see, OntarioFurries has been mentioned in the description of the convention. Should every mention of it be scrubbed? No. Should they all stay? No. This is why OF has a stub of its own. If references to the involvement need to be said, put them there.
::Dan is mentioned on the page as it is. Please see the above comment regarding OF - All of the same opinions apply.
::The page for Furnal Equinox is to give people interested in finding out about it more information about the event. You need only cite a reference and people can choose to go look for themselves. This is the whole reason citations exist.
::As for the editing war going on: give it a rest folks. The page is good. it has the info. Leave it be for a while. Nothing will be added continuing to say that things are in contention.
::To sum it up one last time: rest the topic and move on. Please? Either leave the article info to the people currently involved with the event, or to outside neutral third parties. Wikifur is not the place for personal grievances. (IMHO, no public forum is)
::[[User:Felinaeus|Feli]] 21:36, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

:::Actually, Ontario Furries was removed as a reference.

:::Other people have been named with a description of their contribution. It's only fair that mine be as well.

:::I did cite a reference, and it was removed as well.

:::Not continuing to remove facts that are not in contention and supported by citation should resolve the debate.

:::People who are currently involved in the event should not control what is said about past members.

:::No, it's not a place for personal grievances, but it should be a place for facts.

:::I was just trying add my involvement in the fandom to the appropriate articles. Only FE keeps trying to remove parts of it.

:::[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 03:31, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Danskunk was officially removed from Concom unanimous vote on 7/20/09

==========================
Removal of Dan from concom and staff. Passed. Unanimous Vote
Dan as Staff. Vote was (4)No - (1)Yes. Failed.
Danruk removed from Concom to staff. Passed. Unanimous Vote.
Sparrow removed. *Pro-Forma* Unanimous.
==========================

Excerpt from the Meeting minutes from the date of the meeting.
He knew of the meeting and didn't show up. As can be seen, he was voted of concom and staff as unanimous.
He was not allowed on as staff on a vote of 4-1. The was a Quorum, as for Danruk and Sparrow, both had not been in contact with the committee members and con in a long time. So they were voted on and removed. This was the same time the "new, current and formal" committee was made. Before this it was done at meetings. Not on the forums.

==Meeting Notes==

Who just went in and edited the original committee list? That was not the original committee at all. I went to actually meetings with them and have notes from them.

[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 04:10, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
:Both you and the other user have stated to have copies of the meeting notes that verifies their own argument. However, neither of you have produced visible evidence of these notes as proof for your argument. Could both of you please upload them so that we can view them? [[User:Silver seren|Silver]][[User talk:Silver seren|seren]][[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]] 04:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

::Wolfmist just proved my own argument with the notes he posted. How could I, Danruk, and Sparrow be removed if we weren't already members.

::And who was present at that meeting? I'm only aware of 4, and there were 5 votes.

::[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 04:25, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

There was no concrete committe at that time, only the people who were a form of a committee, at that time the NPO wasn't even signed or registered. So it wasn't even a legal corporation at the time.

You three were considered "members" even though you had not been to any meetings or attending anything. In fact you were the only 3 left who hadn't just walked away and made it clear. yet you were never part of anything. As it stands, I have given factual records of what happened, you have yet to prove anything, from you claiming to be a founder or founding committee member, considering there wasn't even a committee at that time, just a gathering of people.

-Shane

User talk:Wolfmist

2010-07-28T04:23:05Z

Wolfmist: /* Furnal Equinox Meeting Notes */

Talk:Furnal Equinox

2010-07-28T04:18:31Z

Wolfmist: Facts - Danskunk's removal from the con with info.

Furnal Equinox was not created by Danskunk, nor was it created by Ontariofurries and was put together by a committe of people who met on Ontariofurries but that was the extent of it, anything added by or about Danskunk was added by him and are falsifications and lies put into his head by his own self.
:If Dan Skunk was not the founder, can you please provide online evidence of who the real founder is, so this matter can be put to rest? [[User:Silver seren|Silver]][[User talk:Silver seren|seren]][[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]] 17:43, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Members of the committe and con as of First Con in 2010.

Co-Chairs: Blindsight_Wolf
Pakesh_De
Committe: Scani
Shane
Crassadon
ArrowRoot
ArcticFox
Morgan(now Deceased)

There was other people who were involved in the beginning months, they either dropped out, were removed or voted out. As the committee developed and became the current group.

Registered corporate members are: Blindsight_wolf, Scani, Pakesh_de, Shane, Crassadon.
These are people who are registered Directors of the convention. Legally registered on the NPO.

The list of members and concom is available at www.furnalequinox.com and also the original page creator is Scani, so you can also speak with him.

Shane.

: While the list of concom members is not available on Furnal Equinox's website, I can attest that the information Shane has provided is correct for the 2010 concom and can be sourced from our conbook for that year. To reiterate, the claims being made in the article do not reflect Furnal Equinox's stance. I'm open to any questions if desired, though. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 13:28, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

A lot of the source information was removed in 2009 as I removed the Toronto Furry Convention forum from Ontario Furries when it fell into dissuse and hadn't yet created a system to archive deleted posts.

There are a number of people that can corroborate my claim of starting Furnal Equinox, and I could cite some of the early conversations I had with people about the convention from the summer of 2008 but it will be impossible to present anything that can not be contested by Furnal Equinox.

I don't want to be associated with Furnal Equinox and I don't think they want to be associated with me, but I believe the community deserves to have an accurate history of events and that people should be credited for their contributions to the furry community.

As there is likely not going to be a consensus in this situation, the only solution I can see is that we have a section here describing controversy over certain facts and present the differing viewpoints people have on it.

--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 16:55, 18 July 2010

:It's... very unfortunate that a dispute between Dan and FE has been brought into the public eye once again. I don't wish to bring arguments with Dan onto WikiFur, because this is not its purpose for the articles here to be a battleground for the conflicts themselves... only how they're reported, if seen as notable enough to be.
:First of all, I've cleared the "Controversy" section from the article. However, in the interests of good faith, I've copied that section to the bottom of the talk page with two understandings: first, perhaps we can establish a consensus among not just Dan and FE but with the mediation of other WikiFur editors on whether it is needed. Secondly, if there is a consensus that it IS needed, then that section can be collectively edited by not just the stakeholders, but by all in a manner that is satisfactory to all. Personally, I can honestly say that we would rather not see the section there, because it brings forth conflict that, from our evaluation, people would rather just avoid. Moreover, its presence undermines the credibility of both parties.
:However, in the interests of disclosure, this is my understanding of the events that have taken place between Dan and FE (perhaps from a more FE-ish perspective)

:*A Toronto Furry Convention board existed on Ontario Furries from at least late 2008. A number of the current concom members posted on this forum, where a number of ideas were discussed (though no firm decisions re: the planning of the convention as it is taking place now took place as a result - i.e. we did not enter into any contracts with any party, and as the name will suggest, the name Furnal Equinox was not yet decided at this point.)
:*After several months of discussion, a private mailing list was created with the involvement of all those who expressed an interest in serving on the convention committee; their first action was to elect Pakesh De as convention chairman and subsequent decisions such as name, date, and venue were made through here.
:*Anthropomorphic Events of Ontario (AEO) was incorporated as a Ontario corporation without share capital on June 11, 2009. Dan's name was included in the application for incorporation as an initial director.
:*At a meeting of the convention committee on July 20, 2009, Dan was dismissed from Furnal Equinox's concom by a unanimous vote. His actions were perceived as progressively more erratic and independent of the direction the remainder of concom was taking (I refer to it as "we were moving left and he was moving right"), and the consensus was that his removal was in the best interests of the convention's success. He requested to be dismissed from being a director, due to not wanting to be exposed to the convention's liability anymore. This request was granted.
:*Following his removal, Dan expressed his displeasure in a number of ways, engaging in a great deal of public criticism of the convention on Ontario Furries. These criticisms were seen as highly counterproductive, an attempt to erode public confidence in the convention, and evaporated a great deal of goodwill towards him.
:*However, in an attempted gesture of good faith, Dan was mentioned and thanked by name in the conbook for the 2010 convention for his contribution.
:*The relationship between Furnal Equinox and Ontario Furries (the community forum which Dan administrates) has been quite rocky over the past year, and has sometimes been severed altogether to be later restored. However, following the convention in April 2010, Furnal Equinox's subforum on Ontario Furries was deleted without warning. When it became clear that any sort of diplomacy or negotiations to restore the forum would not be successful, the two parties agreed to mutually sever relations.

:It should be noted that I can not attest for any previous research towards the convention Dan may have accomplished. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 23:19, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

"Furnal Equinox was not created by Danskunk, nor was it created by Ontariofurries and was put together by a committe of people who met on Ontariofurries but that was the extent of it, anything added by or about Danskunk was added by him and are falsifications and lies put into his head by his own self."

The committee of people that met on [[Ontario Furries]] were all members of that web site at the time of their meeting; therefore, it would not be inaccurate to say they were Ontario Furries.

Claiming that I am lieing is slanderous. You should back up that claim, or qualify it by saying it's your opinion that they are lies.

Shane became involved the the project later than everyone else and was not involved in those early discussions and has no first hand experience on the events his claims are about.

--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 23:38, 18 July 2010

"He requested to be dismissed from being a director, due to not wanting to be exposed to the convention's liability anymore. This request was granted."

I did not make that request. I discussed it, but decided not to make the request. Had I done so, there would be no displeasure with the decision to remove me from being a director.

Quorum was not present at that meeting, making the decisions against the articles of incorporation. Others dismissed at that meeting were Sparrow and Danruk both of whom were involved in the convention planning prior to creation of the Toronto Furry Convention Board on Ontario Furries and were working with me and supporting my involvement. They were present at the first meetings with hotels, including the one chosen for the convention and instrumental to the success of the convention. None of us were present at this meeting to defend ourselves.

"His actions were perceived as progressively more erratic and independent of the direction the remainder of concom was taking (I refer to it as "we were moving left and he was moving right"), and the consensus was that his removal was in the best interests of the convention's success."

My experience was that being deliberately left out of planning discussions, not being given information I needed to be able to contribute, and being blamed for mistakes others made as a result of this lack of communication to me. My dismissal directly followed my criticism of this behaviour and recommendation that someone else act as chair.

"These criticisms were seen as highly counterproductive, an attempt to erode public confidence in the convention, and evaporated a great deal of goodwill towards him."

This criticism was considered a gesture of goodwill towards the success of the convention, and to prove my value to the success of the convention.

My predictions of wasted and mismanaged space, time, and resources proved to be correct durring the course of the convention. Had my recomendations been acted on, the convention, and it's members, in spite of my removal, would have saved a considerable amount of money. Instead, the recomendations were met with contempt and derision from the convention's remaining organizers.

The wholesale rejection of these recommendations, to me, showed that the success of the convention and service to the community was secondary to the organizers recieving personal recognition for their efforts.

Following the convention, I made public my complaint of unprofessional behaviour and personal prejudice towards me from staff both directly and through convention security after it was dismissed by co-chair, Pakesh De, as personal issues between me and the staff members and not the responsibility of the convention. Something I considered extremely irresponsible and unprofessional.

"It should be noted that I can not attest for any previous research towards the convention Dan may have accomplished."

That research was provided in the initial public discussions for the convention, and in information submitted to the committee after it was formed.

My original desire for contributing to this article was to add the details of Ontario Furries as the location of the forum discussions mentioned and Dan Skunk as the initiator of these discussions. I was, and continue to be the owner of Ontario Furries and it was in this capacity that I created this sub forum after making research into the feasibility of the project. I believe names of contributors and locations where discussions took place to be relevant to an article on the history of the convention. It is obvious that these discussions took place *somewhere* and were started by *someone*. The original organizing committee that created Furnal Equinox was formed through discussion on the Ontario Furries forum through a series of nominations and public voting presented on the forum

If there is contention to these facts, then I assert that this contention then is a relevant part of the history of the convention and that all sides of the contention deserve equal opportunity to present their claims so long as it is made known that these are claims and who is making the claims.

"Personally, I can honestly say that we would rather not see the section there, because it brings forth conflict that, from our evaluation, people would rather just avoid. Moreover, its presence undermines the credibility of both parties."

Wikifur is an encyclopedia which means it should contain factual information presented from a neutral point of view. I believe this means that if there is a dispute over facts, the nature of the dispute should be described in a way that does not attempt to promote either side of the dispute; Wikifurs's purpose is not to promote the credibility of individuals and organizations but inform the fandom of the facts related to them. Facts should not be deliberately omitted to improve the public image of individuals and groups.

In this spirit, I suggest Scani contribute to the proposed section to elaborate on Furnal Equinox's position on the disputed facts unless consensus can be agreed upon.

--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 05:39, 19 July 2010

:''Quorum was not present at that meeting, making the decisions against the articles of incorporation.''
:The assertion that the vote was invalid due to lack of quorum (i.e. a majority of members of the body) is incorrect. While the events in question took place a year ago and are slightly hazy on my part, at the absolute MINIMUM the remaining four directors and/or officers of the convention were present at the time to vote on the matter (which pertained to Dan's removal from concom, as well as from any further staff role with FE. To my recollection, at least five votes were cast; this would be a majority of the concom which consisted of nine members at the time. Moreover, in Ontario, a decision to amend governance would be governed by the corporation's bylaws, not the articles of incorporation. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 12:05, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

::There were 8 committee members at the time. Quorum was decided to be 5 so that there would be a majority. Since there were only 4, then quorum was not reached.

::There could not be 5 votes with only 4 members present.

::I was never made aware of the articles of incorporation or that they were on the application for incorporation.

::I was never made aware of the existence of corporate bi-laws while a director of the corporation.

::I was present for an earlier meeting where it was decided by majority vote that quorum would be 5 to constitute a majority of the 8 members.

::These are only some examples of the unprofessional conduct of members of the committee. While I was a registered director of the corporation, my inquiries into the financial and corporate activities of the corporation were deliberately ignored and I was not informed of decisions being made that affected business of the corporation. My criticism of decisions behind made was strongly discouraged by the chairman ordering me to stop, by insults from committee and staff members, and by being ignored. I was informed by Blindsight that he was asserting his dominance and that I would need to change my behaviour if I wanted to be in the loop.

::--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 00:50, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

:::First of all - I said there were certainly at LEAST four votes, and recall specifically that there were at least five (considering Pak and I recall that Shiro was also present at the meeting). As Shane served in a secretarial role for concom meetings at the time, he would have the record thereof, but I am nonetheless confident that the decision represented the desires of the organization of a whole. While I can understand it being controversial if there had been dissent at the meeting, there was none. This is in line with the purpose of quorum from a moral standpoint (if not a legalistic one) where an unduly small number of people on a governing body do not control the decisions thereof.
:::''I was never made aware of the articles of incorporation or that they were on the application for incorporation.''
:::Your signature was required on the application document, and as far as I know, was obtained at a meeting in early June 2009. Presumably, you would have had the opportunity to review the completed application, which included first directors and "objects of the corporation" at any time while the application was in front of you.
:::I can not speak for these so-called "insults" from concom, but as far as I'm concerned, I did my best to interact with you in good faith, and despite my initial reservations re: your presence, you had every opportunity from me to demonstrate value to us - and I truly believed that because of the quantity of your social network you could be an asset to our operations. Obviously, this did not prove to be the case, and the concom's decision reflected that after several months of working with you.
:::The point I'm trying to make in all of this really has to come down to the group dynamics that worked themselves out. When we first came together, and one of the concerns was coherency. Bringing people together is one thing, but to actually develop some common goals and common purpose is another altogether. A group of people in the same room does not necessarily equal a team. And... regardless of how much work you DID accomplish in the leadup to this, it's another thing to work together, and that impression in your case just wasn't there. People weren't here to just follow your lead. Had you remained present, a lot more friction would have developed, and probably would have had a negative impact on the convention's success. As it turned out... there was a lot of friction anyway. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 12:09, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

::::It was my oversight for not reading through the entire application. We seemed in a hurry to get it done so I just trusted I was already told what was in it.

::::We had a common goal. That was not an issue.

::::I never expected people to follow my lead or anyone else's lead. I expected them to work together as equals. That requires that people communicate their ideas with each other, accept criticism with each other, and make decisions together as a group. Some where not willing to do that, and that's what caused problems.

::::Regardless, my contributions should not be deleted from this article.

::::--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 12:55, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Additional Info: I was a helper to Blindsight at the time and was at the meetings as secreatary and I can attest, after discussions about why to remove Danskunk, the good and bad things he has done for the convention. He was voted out, with Quaorum with a unanimous vote to remove him from the con period.

I may even still have the records as they were transcribed and sent to the list and FE forums that we have of our own.

If Danskunk demands all facts and things should be allowed, then he should freely allow all the "facts" about himself on his wikifur page that pertain to the community and fandom.

Danskunks "Research" was checked out by me and took less then 5 minutes with a quick "wikifur" search, where all his information and research was from.
-Shane Nicholson(WolfMist)

:I accept all facts to be included in this article; any facts that are in dispute should be clearly described as so.

:My research took place over many months of travelling to Toronto to look at possible venues, through discussions with members of the community interested in helping, interviews with people who were directors at other successful conventions, some of it was collected from wikifur, but it was also re-organized to better serve our needs. I also brought observations from many years of attending conventions.

:Shane was not involved in this reasearch.

:--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 01:02, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

It's quite evident that we're not going to reach a consensus on this. Could we start working on editing the proposed section to include what information we all want to provide there?

--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 01:09, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

:Primarily speaking, the parties involved here are FE and you. I'd honestly be more comfortable seeking the opinions of neutral parties if possible, to objectively assess what the value of what you're proposing is - as neither of us will be able to do that. Will this controversy, namely, be important five years down the line?
:Re: the section that was recently added listing 'founding members' - a few of the names asked to withdraw their involvement quite early, and they may object to their appearance here in this article. The list also fails to acknowledge individuals that came on board after founding whose contribution nonetheless played an instrumental role in the convention's success... and I honestly feel they should not be trivialized (people like Morgan, Arrowroot, etc.)
:So I'm not sure if the section as it currently stands is appropriate, but if others say it should, alphabetical would be more appropriate. Perhaps the information is better classified elsewhere, but I'll comment more on that tomorrow. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 03:26, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
::I've made it alphabetical. I didn't know about later joining members. Perhaps we should keep the current list, though rewrite the lead-in to say original founding members and then have a separate sentence listing those that joined in after the fact? They should certainly be recognized.

::And if any of the people listed do not wish their name to be associated with Furnal Equinox, then they just have to speak with Greenreaper and he will take them off and make sure they stay off of the list. [[User:Silver seren|Silver]][[User talk:Silver seren|seren]][[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]] 03:39, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

:::My suggestion would be that if needed, the relevant information be placed in a 'current' and 'former' section in the article (perhaps as a two-column table) - or at least other titles that represent those who are still working on the convention and those who have moved on to other projects. There should be no particular stigma associated with the latter. Also, ref. proposed changes below (you can always refer back to previous edits for previous versions) --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 11:52, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

::::I don't believe a current and former section is necessary. There is already an origins section there which is appropriate to list the original organizers in, describe their contributions, and when and why they left.

::::I sincerly appreciate you acknowledging that the discussions began on Ontario Furries, Scani. If there is consensus on that fact, then I believe it can stand in the origins section where I originally placed it as it is most relevant to that topic. I would also like it stated that I started the conversation there. Another contributer has been contesting both though so it may only be able to stand as a contested fact, but it can be stated the we both support it.

::::I don't believe a description of my removal should be in an Ontario Furries section as it is not relevant to Ontario Furries, but to myself only. My criticism should also not be included there as it was my personal opinion--not that of Ontario Furries.

::::I think we could put it the description of my and Ontario Furries's involvement in the origins section as it is most relevant there. I don't believe either are important enough to warrant their own headlines.

::::I disagree with saying there was a lack of shared direction, as there was a shared direction: producing a convention, a goal which all parties made contributions critical to it's success. The only disagrement was over details of how to accomplish those goals and responsibilities of individual members. I may wish to describe what those were.

::::I also disagree with saying there was a conflict between me and the rest of the concom because that was not true. I had disagreements with only half of the concom. I'd also like it stated that everyone that supported my inclusion was also removed.

::::I'd like to add my own perception of my criticism's as I saw them quite differently.

::::I contest that there was no warning, as I made repeated requests of FE to change their behaviour and would like to add my own assesment of why they were removed.

::::I'll get to adding my revisions later.

::::--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 13:28, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

:::Scani, as long as there is someone that feels the information to be valuable, there is no reason it can not be included. Other parties are free to contribute their knowledge to the article as well, as this is a colaborative effort but no one should be censoring other people's contributions based on their assesment of how valuable they are. Readers should be given the opportunity to have as much information as possible and decide for themselves what is or is not valuable to them.

:::Whether or not someone wishes to be included in the article or not is irrelevant. Deliberately presenting false information, or omitting information for the purpose of manipulating public opinion for any reason is dishonest and against the spirit of wikifur as being a place to present factual information from a neutral perspective.

:::Making the list alphabetical sounds good to me. Thank you.

:::If someone does not want to be associated with Furnal Equinox, it should be added to the article that they do not wish to be associated with it, thusly satisfying their desire for disassociating without sacrificing the integrity of facts. However, I think stating that they resigned, should be enough to indicate their lack of support.

:::--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 12:33, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

== Relationship with Ontario Furries (proposed) ==

Discussion for what became Furnal Equinox originally took place on the [[Ontario Furries]] forum, operated by [[Dan Skunk]]. Though Dan was originally involved in planning discussions, he was removed from the Furnal Equinox organizing committee and board of directors in July 2009 due to lack of shared direction and conflicts between him and the remainder of concom.

Many of Furnal Equinox's concom members have taken the stance that Dan's publicly posted and unsolicited criticisms since his removal have been disproportionately critical of the con and its staff, and negatively affected its reputation. Dan has claimed that his removal was unjustified, and that he has been subjected to negative treatment and insults by other staff members. Both claims are disputed by the other party.

The relationship between members of Furnal Equinox's convention committee and Dan has remained strained, culminating in the removal of Furnal Equinox's subforum and the banning of a number of committee members without warning in April 2010. Currently, Furnal Equinox and Ontario Furries have no formal connections.

Propose addtions to Origins instead of Relationship with Ontario Furries section.

I've been researching more details, so much of the Ontario Furries discussion is redundant.

--[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 12:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

== Origins ==

[[Dan Skunk]] was removed from the Furnal Equinox organizing committee and board of directors in July 2009 over disagreements with some of the other committee members. [[M-So]] and [[Danruk]] were also removed on this date.

:[[Dan Skunk]] contests the decision as quorum was not present at this meeting and none of the people removed were given an opportunity to be present to defend themselves. He claims the dismissals were politically motivated because he expressed a lack of confidence in [[Pakesh De]] chairship immediately prior to being removed and that the others removed were friends of his.

:[[Scani]] claims [[Dan Skunk]] was removed over conflicts with other members of the concom and a lack of shared direction and that the decision represented the desires of the organization as a whole.

==Relationship with Ontario Furries==

[[Furnal Equinox]], along with members of the concom, [[Pakesh De]], [[Blindsight]], [[Shane]], [[Chris]] were banned from discussions on [[Ontario Furries]] in April 2010 for repeated insulting and defamitory comments.
:[[Scani]] claims it was without warning.
:Many of Furnal Equinox's concom members have taken the stance that Dan's publicly posted and unsolicited criticisms since his removal have been disproportionately critical of the con and its staff, and negatively affected its reputation.

==Request for Intervention==

This situation has become absolutely ridiculous, and I'm not satisfied with it whatsoever. The changes made by Dan to the article over the past couple of years have resulted in a significant decrease in quality in the article, not to mention a significant shift away from a neutral point of view. The changes that were made can only be described as "self-aggrandizing" and disproportionate to the remainder of the article.

Is it possible for both parties to lay off editing and that another party come in to perhaps arbitrate this issue? This is the continued manifestation of a conflict between Dan and Furnal Equinox - and I really don't feel it's fair for Dan to continue to edit the article unilaterally and play up his importance (just as it wouldn't be fair for us to do likewise). --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 20:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

:I haven't been following this situation that closely but I will offer a couple of observations:
:#If someone is posting information they claim to be true and others dispute it, then one side or the other needs to provide references to back up their claims. If neither side is able to do so, then it reverts to the level of hearsay, and we have to settle for something like "So-and-so claims X but others have disputed this." Also note that any allegedly deleted websites may in fact be preserved at sites such as [http://www.archive.org/web/web.php The Internet Wayback Machine] and those are generally as reliable as the original sites if the material still exists there.
:#We don't need a detailed play-by-play of who said what and what happened when. The only people who care about that level of detail are the handful of people who were directly involved. A summary description is good enough for the other 99% of us, and that's all we need on Wikifur. And it's quite possible that a summary description can be written in a manner that much of the content under dispute doesn't even matter at that level of detail. Try to imagine how you'd summarize something that happened a few years ago, then do it that way.
:I hope this helps. Oh, and here in the talk page, please remember to sign your posts with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). --[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 21:58, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

::I think a few notible points in the development and who was responsible for them is reasonable.

::If someone thinks they're important, and they're factual and referenced, there's no reason for them not to be included.

::It's a fair look at who contributed what in the lead up to the event. If someone happens to have made a lot of contributions, they'll of course be mentioned more. I any case, it's unfair and misleading to remove all reference to someone who made contributions.

::Arbitration is unnecessary, you have the opportunity to add anything that was left out.

::Please refrain from personal attacks, Scani. If you have something to contest, it can be removed as a fact.

::--Dan Skunk 22:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

:::That's more than a few notable points. If you were viewing the article about some other convention that's been running for several years, would you really care to see that level of detail about how it got started, to the level of quotations from the parties involved, assuming you were at most only casually acquainted online with any of the people involved? Most people wouldn't, and I don't think most people do here either. It could be argued that it should be preserved for those with enough historical interest to care, but the main article about the convention here on Wikifur is not the place to do it. (On an unrelated style note, only the first occurrence of each person mentioned in the article should be wikilinked.) --[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 22:34, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

::::I think it would be fine without the quotes, and just a few notes.

::::The name of the forum mentioned and who started the discussion does not seem to be too much to include, as it only adds five words. That's what I find most important and relevant as the section is about origins and that describes where the organization originated, and who it originated from.

::::That was contested and removed, so I did some research and found a reference to it, hence the quote and link backing it up. I could replace the quote with a footnote of where the reference is located.

::::While doing research to find that reference, I found who found the venue and who found the date. Those are at least as notible as who thought of the name, so if originator of the name is included, I think that of the venue and date should be as well.

::::I thought it was interesting to watch how the idea of the convention was developed from another event, and thought that would be interesting to show. I could be included in a seperate page though describing a timeline for those so interested to view it without hindering the conciseness of the main article. I could also do that without offering all the quotes, but rather references to them.

::::Linking only the first occurance seems reasonable as it makes the article easier to read. I don't understand signing posts with 4 tildes. What does that do? My appologies for being new to wikifur. I had stuff to contribute, especially to my own article, and am learning how to work with people here as I go. Thank you for the help.

::::--Dan Skunk 23:44, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

:::::I apologize for my brusqueness earlier - this process has been tremendously frustrating. From my own personal opinion, the edits which added comments such as "Dan Skunk... made the first visit", "Dan Skunk created a board..." and "Dan Skunk promoted having the convention..." in rapid succession, especially considering the edits were made by Dan, did come across in a very self-promotional manner and rubbed me the wrong way. A significant number of Dan's edits since this issue have had something to do with attributing foundation to Furnal Equinox to Dan and his website, Ontario Furries.
:::::I perceive the basic issue at hand to be "how much credit should be given to Dan Skunk for the establishment of Furnal Equinox in this article". This is also not a fight about "contesting" material; the ideal solution would be an article that is acceptable to both parties, and... well, the unsolicited edits to the page certainly breached my understanding that was something that could be worked towards. Not only one that is based in fact but one that is fair, neutral, and NOT an attempt to dig up dirt. I left a message asking for arbitration because it did not seem possible to do this.
:::::The question, too, is what proportion of recognition is appropriate. A project such as running a convention is collective, not individual. There are a lot of people who saw this work to completion, and I don't think it's appropriate to throw them in the background so that one person can come forth unilaterally and say "I did this and this." Moreover, who's to say there weren't people who looked into the feasibility of a furry convention in Toronto prior to this? (Yes, I know, citation needed.)
:::::My proposal remains a list of current and former people involved in a concom role in the current 'Staff' section, as well as an acknowledgement that initial discussion took place on Ontario Furries. (Honestly, given an opportunity, I'd like to turn back the clock to 19 May but realize that's not likely.)
:::::For the record, signing a message with four tildes will post your current username (or IP address if you are not logged in), as well as the current date and time. --[[User:Scani|Scani]] 04:30, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

::::::Thank you, Scani. I appreciate the appology and forgive that.

::::::I can certainly understand how the edits I made would seem self promotional, especially comming from myself. That's why I was trying to include other names in it as well. I was hoping if someone had something they though should be mentioned about them, that they should add it as well, resolving more of the one sidedness.

::::::Unfortunately, if we are to be honest and neutral, I did contribute a lot of essential information and resources to the convention. To minimize those contributions would be not be honest and neutral.

::::::Scani's proposal.

::::::I think only adding that the discussion took place on Ontairo Furries would be deminishing my contribution. The discussions took place on Ontario Furries, but as is show from the email referenced, those discussions were started by me only after I had gathered the financial resources needed to start the convention.

::::::A more accurate description would be, "After gathering the needed financial resources to start a convention, Dan Skunk, started a discussion on Ontario Furries inviting others to become involved with the project." That will remove the incorrect information that the financial resources were brought together though those discussions. It also shows who initiated the process.

::::::You've mentioned who thought of the name, but if there's anyone, at all, that should be mentioned, it's the person that came up with the idea to start seriously working on the project.

::::::There were others that looked into running a convention Toronto that year. I started looking at venues following the first Islington Furmeet on June 14, 2008. Pyhrra did so as well but he concluded it was not a good time to start one based on economic conditions. M-So did asked me to help him look at venues on November 19, 2008.

::::::M-So and I concluded it was feasible and that we would work together on it.

::::::He should probably be mentioned as founding it as well.

::::::I would certainly prefer to come to a consensus on what to include in the article. But giving my experience with this article, I'm not certain that's possible. You've very diplomatic and professional about things, but you and me are not the only people interested in the article.

::::::We can't turn back time, but we could certainly repair mistakes. If it's something about me, I'm very forgiving. You just need to appologize and undo whatever was wrong.

::::::If it were up to me, I'd have turned back time to December 3, 2008, and not made a post inviting people to help with the convention untill *after* creating an npo and contracting the hotel--thusly completely avoiding this whole controversy and a lot of frustration and heartache to a lot of people.

::::::Thanks for letting me know what the tildes do.

::::::[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 18:59, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Greetings to this thread which is currently growing to become a small editorial if not soon a book with special guest stars.

The current issue is credit where credit is due. Dan claims to have been *the* original creator of the con based on his board, gathering of folks, and even finding a backer. All said and done, but the *idea* which is being missed is the real idea was well over a decade ago when folks like me, benjamin, deuce, hiker, and many other old furs of the fandom groused about a con local to Toronto which then grew to become as we all know as Feral.

Now Dan was there at the start, had done some work, and did indeed find some folks that got together to make a functional convention yes. However personal issues much less other incidents which need not , or should not, need to be bandied about made such a arrangement intolerable and sadly it was a case of *my way or the highway* and the concom voted to remove what was perceived as the greatest trouble with the least amount of gutting of the con. Now and since then the level of anger from said removed party has led to folks in large numbers banned from his board while he continues to attack the con without any feedback from us as being some of the banned folks in question to simply and repeatedly asking to have issues reopened that were voted closed.

That is fair, and all part of being a open and democratic process. The issue is if this is all being done to simply add credit where credit is due then simply what is being told as * dan, danruk, sparrow* were at the start but were voted out after issued arouse should.. note *should* be enough for most folks. Apparently this is NOT the case and thus after many attempts personally to resolve the issue and being rebuffed I had to delegate any talks about Dan to the PR head Scani. I am only posting now after seeing this topic refuses to fall back into a common thread of acceptance with repeated rebuttals of any and all information we can provide. I wish to stay civil and not fall for the supposed * slander* attempts,and btw, slander is a very easy word to misuse and with the stuff being posted on your own board dan by yourself that others are reporting to us, one should be *very* careful when tossing that word around. I accept giving dan, danruk, and sparrow credit for being at the start and getting a few things going certainly. Claiming basically * if it was not for me NONE of this would have happened* is taking credit well into the realm of tooting ones own horn.

IF this is all that is needed, i will ask that any and *all* talk of the convention is simply kept on topic and in more terms of * yes and we thank you but we had to let you go* as in terms of a employee being let go from the company rather then the slant that is being pushed out as if we all sat around in some plotting basement to overthrow folks and thus hijack the whole convention our-self. That is why we voted in concom to have a legal amount, plus the other staff that was around, voted, and revoted just to make sure the vote was open. I have told Dan this, others have told Dan this, and it refuses to simply sink in. The con did not, was not, and with all the bad blood, will not, have anything to do with Dan period. Note this can change if the lopsidedness does stop but alas many have tried and failed to get the point through.

I thank everyone for adding to the topic and folks for trying to make one side see the light. I wish to thank wikifur for letting us post the con and will hope they will be happy to have us stay. I wish to thank Scani for being PR and dealing with this topic with skill, grace, and civility. I wish to thank dan for continuing to claim credit well after the fact, and as is his right, can and will be mentioned as * a founding member* if so wanted, and IF as mentioned earlier, any and all unwarranted comments, attacks, and shenanigans on his side of the boards will cease and desist. one can hardly ask to be listened to and have demands of any sort treated fairly if only one side is playing the game above board..or one hopes it should be both sides playing fair.

Gaia bless and sorry for such a long winded reply.

Pakesh_De

ChairCritter for Furnal Equinox

:I never claimed to be the first person to think of having a convention in Toronto. I even cited other people speaking of it before me to show that. It wasn't however, untill I gathered financial support and sought others to be involved that it came to fruition.

:That fact should be included.

:"my way or the highway"

:I never once made any such demand. Please stop accusing me of it if you can't provide any evidence to support it.

:"That is fair, and all part of being a open and democratic process."

:That's what I actually asked for, and it was asked for, not demanded.

:"...slander is a very easy word to misuse and with the stuff being posted on your own board dan by yourself that others are reporting to us, one should be *very* careful when tossing that word around."

:I can support what I said there with citations. I'll do that as soon as I can for you.

:"Claiming basically * if it was not for me NONE of this would have happened* is taking credit well into the realm of tooting ones own horn."

:I never made that claim either.

:I claimed to have got financial support together and started a discussion on Ontario Furries and supported that claim with a citation that showed nothing more than that.

:If you wish to be fair, as you claim to be, then you should not have a problem with that being included.

:" I wish to thank dan for continuing to claim credit well after the fact, and as is his right, can and will be mentioned as * a founding member* if so wanted, and IF as mentioned earlier, any and all unwarranted comments, attacks, and shenanigans on his side of the boards will cease and desist. one can hardly ask to be listened to and have demands of any sort treated fairly if only one side is playing the game above board..or one hopes it should be both sides playing fair."

:I'm pretty sure wikifur articles were not meant to be used as extortion to silence unwanted criticism from other web sites.

:People saying what you want them to on other web sites should not be a condition of whether something is contested or not.

:Please stop taking my words and infering things from them I never said or meant and making accusations you can't support.

:This is why we have trouble speaking with each other, and why I strongly suggested someone else act as chairman before being fired from FE. If someone like Scani, who as we both agree, has the ability to speak with skill, grace, and civility, were chairman, relations between FE, Ontario Furries and I would probably have never degraded in the first place.

:The first time I banned FE from Ontario Furries, your discussion with me had me wanting to make it permanent. It was Scani's respectful and professional manner and his willingness to take responsibility for problems and solve them that convinced me to give you a second chance. It's unfortunate he isn't able speak for the rest FE.

:[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 03:31, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

::Okay, I'm going to weigh in my opinions. As an outside party, I feel it might be worth it.
::As I can see, OntarioFurries has been mentioned in the description of the convention. Should every mention of it be scrubbed? No. Should they all stay? No. This is why OF has a stub of its own. If references to the involvement need to be said, put them there.
::Dan is mentioned on the page as it is. Please see the above comment regarding OF - All of the same opinions apply.
::The page for Furnal Equinox is to give people interested in finding out about it more information about the event. You need only cite a reference and people can choose to go look for themselves. This is the whole reason citations exist.
::As for the editing war going on: give it a rest folks. The page is good. it has the info. Leave it be for a while. Nothing will be added continuing to say that things are in contention.
::To sum it up one last time: rest the topic and move on. Please? Either leave the article info to the people currently involved with the event, or to outside neutral third parties. Wikifur is not the place for personal grievances. (IMHO, no public forum is)
::[[User:Felinaeus|Feli]] 21:36, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

:::Actually, Ontario Furries was removed as a reference.

:::Other people have been named with a description of their contribution. It's only fair that mine be as well.

:::I did cite a reference, and it was removed as well.

:::Not continuing to remove facts that are not in contention and supported by citation should resolve the debate.

:::People who are currently involved in the event should not control what is said about past members.

:::No, it's not a place for personal grievances, but it should be a place for facts.

:::I was just trying add my involvement in the fandom to the appropriate articles. Only FE keeps trying to remove parts of it.

:::[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 03:31, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Danskunk was officially removed from Concom unanimous vote on 7/20/09

==========================
Removal of Dan from concom and staff. Passed. Unanimous Vote
Dan as Staff. Vote was (4)No - (1)Yes. Failed.
Danruk removed from Concom to staff. Passed. Unanimous Vote.
Sparrow removed. *Pro-Forma* Unanimous.
==========================

Excerpt from the Meeting minutes from the date of the meeting.
He knew of the meeting and didn't show up. As can be seen, he was voted of concom and staff as unanimous.
He was not allowed on as staff on a vote of 4-1. The was a Quorum, as for Danruk and Sparrow, both had not been in contact with the committee members and con in a long time. So they were voted on and removed. This was the same time the "new, current and formal" committee was made. Before this it was done at meetings. Not on the forums.

==Meeting Notes==

Who just went in and edited the original committee list? That was not the original committee at all. I went to actually meetings with them and have notes from them.

[[User:Dan Skunk|Dan Skunk]] 04:10, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
:Both you and the other user have stated to have copies of the meeting notes that verifies their own argument. However, neither of you have produced visible evidence of these notes as proof for your argument. Could both of you please upload them so that we can view them? [[User:Silver seren|Silver]][[User talk:Silver seren|seren]][[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]] 04:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Furnal Equinox

2010-07-28T04:01:28Z

Wolfmist: Edit: I have the proven facts, trnscribed meetings notes from 2009 and more as I was acting secretary in 2009 along with other responsabilites.

{{Infobox convention
|name = Furnal Equinox
|logo =
|caption =
| subject = Furry
| location = {{flagdiv|can|[[Wikipedia:Toronto|Toronto]], [[Wikipedia:Ontario|Ontario]], [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]]}}
| url = http://www.furnalequinox.com/
| status = Ongoing
| first = 6-7 March 2010
| final =
| organizer = Anthropomorphic Events of Ontario
| charity =
| resources = {{con resources}}
}}{{Furnal Equinox}}
'''Furnal Equinox''' is a furry [[convention]] held during the month of March in [[Wikipedia:Toronto|Toronto]], [[Wikipedia:Ontario|Ontario]], [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]].

== Origins ==

Prior to Furnal Equinox's establishment, the largest gatherings in the [[Toronto Furry|Toronto area]] tended to be larger furmeets such as the [[Islington Furmeet]] and BBQs hosted by [[Potoroo]], which regularly attracted between 50 to 100 people. Despite significant community support, Toronto had not yet hosted a hotel-based furry event. Furnal Equinox was therefore promoted in its first year as "Toronto's First Furry Convention".

The convention originated from discussion on forums in late 2008 and early 2009, bringing together a number of interested individuals and the financial resources to develop a convention committee and the required organization. Furnal Equinox was formally announced to the world on July 1 (Canada Day), 2009.<ref>''[http://www.furnalequinox.com/FAQ FAQ], Furnal Equinox website (accessed 14 July 2010)</ref>

The convention had no committe to start and was dicussed on forums until an official committee was put together in 2009. Official committee at the time was Shiro Tora, BlindSight, Pakesh_De, Crassadon, Scani & Arctic Fox. Previously there was people who were part of the "community" but never were part of the comittee, due to inability to commnicate, get together or be an active part of the convention.

Two addition Committee members were later added. Shane Nicholson and ArrowRoot. The final committee by mid 2009 consisted of the signing NPO members: Pakesh_De, Scani, Blindsight, Shane & Crassadon, also non-NPO members ArcticFox, ShiroTora & ArrowRoot.

The name Furnal Equinox was conceived by [[ShiroTora]] and plays upon the convention's placement in March during the beginning of spring (the vernal equinox).<ref>''[http://www.furnalequinox.com/About-Us About Us]'', Furnal Equinox website (accessed 14 July 2010)</ref>

== History ==

'''[[Furnal Equinox 2010]]''' took place on March 6-7, 2010 at the Doubletree by Hilton Toronto Airport, attracting 330 attendees - the most for any furry event in Canada up to that point. The guests of honour were [[Heather Bruton]] and [[BushyCat]], and the convention celebrated the theme of "Furry Fun and Games".

'''[[Furnal Equinox 2011]]''' will occur on March 11-13, 2011, returning to the Doubletree Toronto Airport. The Guests of Honour will be [[FirestormSix]] and [[ZEN]], and the convention's theme will be "Wild Magic".

== Staff ==

[[Pakesh De]] and [[Blindsight]] are the current co-chairs of Furnal Equinox.

Others currently involved include [[Aaeden Aranor]], [[Arctic]] (security), [[Arinmal]], [[Arrowroot]] (dealers), [[Kimba]], [[Scani]] (publicity/business), and [[Shane]] (registration/volunteers).

Furnal Equinox is operated by Anthropomorphic Events of Ontario, a not-for-profit corporation in the Province of Ontario.

==References==
<references />

==External links==
*[http://www.furnalequinox.com/ Furnal Equinox website]
*[http://forums.furnalequinox.com/ Furnal Equinox forum]
*[http://community.livejournal.com/furnalequinox/ Furnal Equinox on LiveJournal]
*[http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=165793707559 Furnal Equinox on Facebook]
*[http://twitter.com/furnalequinox Furnal Equinox on Twitter]
* {{con resources}}

{{Conventions}}

[[Category:Conventions]]
[[Category:Toronto]]
[[Category:2010 births]]

Talk:Furnal Equinox

2010-07-19T20:28:10Z

Wolfmist: Edit: It's Anthropomorphic Events of Ontario. If you cannot even quote the registered NPO name of the con Dan, how can you claim to know much about it.

Talk:Furnal Equinox

2010-07-16T20:28:16Z

Wolfmist:

Dan Skunk

2010-07-16T15:40:08Z

Wolfmist: Danskunk continues to add false information about the con, claiming he started it and it's from Ontariofurries, when it wasn't. He is not a founder or part of FE!

'''Dan Skunk''' (born May 22, 1974)<ref name="DanSkunkLJP">[http://danskunk.livejournal.com/profile Dan Skunk's profile] on [[LiveJournal]]. Retrieved May 15, 2008</ref> is a [[furry]] who lives in [[Wikipedia:Oshawa|Oshawa]], Ontario, Canada.<ref name="DanSkunkLJP"/> Dan Skunk's hobbies include writing poetry.

Dan was a furry from a very young age. Since the age of three, he would daydream about being a [[Skunk (species)|skunk]], and often felt different or wanted to be something else.<ref>[http://www.furnation.com/danskunk/ Dan Skunk's biography] on [[FurNation]]. Retrieved May 15, 2008</ref> He discovered [[furry fandom]] on Tuesday, August 19, 2003, at 10:21 PM, when he watched ''[[Animal Imitators]]'' on TLC and discovered there were others with similar feelings to himself.

== Fandom involvement ==

Dan Skunk is active within the [[Toronto Furry]] group {{fact}}.

The original [[Toronto-furry]] website, which ran was 1998 to late 2005, was reopened by Dan on [[FurNation]] in May, 2006 and grew from 32 members to 400 before it was renamed to [[Ontario Furries]] in 2008. As of July 2010, it had over 1000 members, making it the most popular Canadian furry site.

Dan Skunk created the first chat room for Toronto furs, [[#torfur]] in 2005 as well, then [[#toronto-furry]] in 2006, and [[#OntarioFurries]] in 2008, all on [[FurNet]].

Dan Skunk was a volunteer at [[Anthrocon]] and [[Midwest Furfest]] in 2007, becoming staff from 2008 to present.

Dan Skunk was co-founder and organizer of the Toronto Furry Spaghetti Factory Dinner from 2007 to 2008, Co-Founder of the [[Islington Furmeet]] in 2008.

==References==
<references/>

==External links==
{{Contributor}}
* [http://www.furaffinity.net/user/danskunk/ Dan Skunk] on [[Fur Affinity]]
* [http://www.furnation.com/danskunk/ Dan Skunk] on [[FurNation]]
* [http://danskunk.livejournal.com/ Dan Skunk] on [[LiveJournal]]

{{person-stub}}
[[Category:People]]
[[Category:Writers]]
[[Category:Poets]]
[[Category:Skunk characters]]
[[Category:Ontario]]
[[Category:1974 births]]

Furnal Equinox

2010-05-02T23:12:07Z

Wolfmist:

Furnal Equinox

2010-05-02T23:07:00Z

Wolfmist:

Dan Skunk

2010-04-19T18:37:02Z

Wolfmist: I know this guy personally, I know most of these things as Actual fact, please consider that before deleteing it again. In fact most of this is common knowledge about this furry.

'''Dan Skunk''' (born May 22, 1974)<ref name="DanSkunkLJP">[http://danskunk.livejournal.com/profile Dan Skunk's profile] on [[LiveJournal]]. Retrieved May 15, 2008</ref> is a [[furry]] who lives in [[Wikipedia:Oshawa|Oshawa]], Ontario, Canada.<ref name="DanSkunkLJP"/> Dan Skunk's hobbies include writing poetry.

Dan was a furry from a very young age. Since the age of three, he would daydream about being a [[Skunk (species)|skunk]], and often felt different or wanted to be something else.<ref>[http://www.furnation.com/danskunk/ Dan Skunk's biography] on [[FurNation]]. Retrieved May 15, 2008</ref> He discovered [[furry fandom]] on Tuesday, August 19, 2003, at 10:21 PM, when he watched ''[[Animal Imitators]]'' on TLC and discovered there were others with similar feelings to himself.

== Fandom involvement ==

Dan Skunk is active within the [[Toronto Furry]] group {{fact}}. The original Toronto-furry website, which ran was 1998 to late 2005, was reopened by Dan on [[FurNation]] in May, 2006 and became defunct in 2008.

[http://www.ontariofurries.ca Ontariofurries] is a separate forum and site from the [http://torfur.com torfur] one.

Danskunk is known for two things, the ontariofurries website and IRC channel and for his manic mood swings and mental issues.

Recently Danskunk has been known for his personal vendetta against the Furnal Equinox Convention after he was unanimously voted off the Committee and from ever being staff.

He has made many claims to have been staff at other cons, but the truth has show he was a "volunteer" and was regated to Gopher uses. He has some staff badges, from working in Dealers den areas.

He is also known to be wearing the same grungy, falling apart shirt. He is also know for wearing his other con badges with "staff" ribbons on them etc, in an attempt to assumingly be recognized as such.

Danskunk has a habit of running away when he screws up, usually with the known words of "I feel sick, I feel tired". Usually resulting in logging off and dissapearing for a few days or a week.

Danskunk has many mental issues that cause most of this, while most is not his fault, it doesn't change the fact and reputation he has.
References

==References==
<references/>

==External links==
{{Contributor}}
* [http://www.furaffinity.net/user/danskunk/ Dan Skunk] on [[Fur Affinity]]
* [http://www.furnation.com/danskunk/ Dan Skunk] on [[FurNation]]
* [http://danskunk.livejournal.com/ Dan Skunk] on [[LiveJournal]]

{{person-stub}}
[[Category:People]]
[[Category:Writers]]
[[Category:Poets]]
[[Category:Skunk characters]]
[[Category:Ontario]]
[[Category:1974 births]]

Dan Skunk

2010-04-19T02:25:21Z

Wolfmist:

'''Dan Skunk''' (born May 22, 1974)<ref name="DanSkunkLJP">[http://danskunk.livejournal.com/profile Dan Skunk's profile] on [[LiveJournal]]. Retrieved May 15, 2008</ref> is a [[furry]] who lives in [[Wikipedia:Oshawa|Oshawa]], Ontario, Canada.<ref name="DanSkunkLJP"/>

Dan was a furry from a very young age. Since the age of three, he would daydream about being a [[Skunk (species)|skunk]], and often felt different or wanted to be something else.<ref>[http://www.furnation.com/danskunk/ Dan Skunk's biography] on [[FurNation]]. Retrieved May 15, 2008</ref> He discovered [[furry fandom]] on Tuesday, August 19th, 2003, at 10:21 PM, when he watched ''[[Animal Imitators]]'' on TLC and discovered there were others with similar feelings to himself.

Today, Dan Skunk is very active within the [[Toronto Furry]] group {{fact}}. The original toronto-furry website, which ran was 1998 to late 2005, was reopened by Dan on [[FurNation]] in May, 2006 and became defunct in 2008.

[http://www.ontariofurries.ca Ontariofurries] is a seperate forum and site from the [http://torfur.com torfur] one.

'''-=DanSkunk by someone who doesn't fill your head with lies about himself=-'''

'''Danskunk is known for two things, the ontariofurries website and IRC channel and for his manic mood swings and mental issues. He is also know for carrying a STD and having spread it(rumors).'''

'''Recently Danskunk has been known for his personal vendetta against the Furnal Equinox Convention after he was unanimously voted off the Committee and from ever being staff.'''

'''He has made many claims to have been staff at other cons, but the truth has show he was a "volunteer" and was regated to Gopher uses. He has some staff badges, from working in Dealers den areas.'''

'''He is also known to be wearing the same grungy, falling apart shirt. He is also know for wearing his other con badges with "staff" ribbons on them etc, in an attempt to assumingly be recognized as such.'''

'''Danskunk has a habit of running away when he screws up, usually with the known words of "I feel sick, I feel tired". Usually resulting in logging off and dissapearing for a few days or a week.'''

'''Danskunk has many mental issues that cause most of this, while most is not his fault, it doesn't change the fact and reputation he has.'''

==References==
<references/>

==External links==
{{Contributor}}
* [http://danskunk.livejournal.com/ Dan Skunk] on [[LiveJournal]]
* [http://www.furnation.com/danskunk/ Dan Skunk] on [[FurNation]]
* [http://www.furaffinity.net/user/danskunk/ Dan Skunk] on [[Fur Affinity]]

{{person-stub}}
[[Category:People]]
[[Category:Writers]]
[[Category:Poets]]
[[Category:Skunk characters]]
[[Category:Ontario]]
[[Category:1974 births]]

Dan Skunk

2010-04-19T02:24:49Z

Wolfmist:

'''Dan Skunk''' (born May 22, 1974)<ref name="DanSkunkLJP">[http://danskunk.livejournal.com/profile Dan Skunk's profile] on [[LiveJournal]]. Retrieved May 15, 2008</ref> is a [[furry]] who lives in [[Wikipedia:Oshawa|Oshawa]], Ontario, Canada.<ref name="DanSkunkLJP"/>

Dan was a furry from a very young age. Since the age of three, he would daydream about being a [[Skunk (species)|skunk]], and often felt different or wanted to be something else.<ref>[http://www.furnation.com/danskunk/ Dan Skunk's biography] on [[FurNation]]. Retrieved May 15, 2008</ref> He discovered [[furry fandom]] on Tuesday, August 19th, 2003, at 10:21 PM, when he watched ''[[Animal Imitators]]'' on TLC and discovered there were others with similar feelings to himself.

Today, Dan Skunk is very active within the [[Toronto Furry]] group {{fact}}. The original toronto-furry website, which ran was 1998 to late 2005, was reopened by Dan on [[FurNation]] in May, 2006 and became defunct in 2008.

[http://www.ontariofurries.ca Ontariofurries] is a seperate forum and site from the [http://torfur.com torfur] one.

'''-=DanSkunk by someone who doesn't fill your head with lies about himself=-'''

'''Dan Skunk's hobbies include writing poetry.'''

'''Danskunk is known for two things, the ontariofurries website and IRC channel and for his manic mood swings and mental issues. He is also know for carrying a STD and having spread it(rumors).'''

'''Recently Danskunk has been known for his personal vendetta against the Furnal Equinox Convention after he was unanimously voted off the Committee and from ever being staff.'''

'''He has made many claims to have been staff at other cons, but the truth has show he was a "volunteer" and was regated to Gopher uses. He has some staff badges, from working in Dealers den areas.'''

'''He is also known to be wearing the same grungy, falling apart shirt. He is also know for wearing his other con badges with "staff" ribbons on them etc, in an attempt to assumingly be recognized as such.'''

'''Danskunk has a habit of running away when he screws up, usually with the known words of "I feel sick, I feel tired". Usually resulting in logging off and dissapearing for a few days or a week.'''

'''Danskunk has many mental issues that cause most of this, while most is not his fault, it doesn't change the fact and reputation he has.'''

==References==
<references/>

==External links==
{{Contributor}}
* [http://danskunk.livejournal.com/ Dan Skunk] on [[LiveJournal]]
* [http://www.furnation.com/danskunk/ Dan Skunk] on [[FurNation]]
* [http://www.furaffinity.net/user/danskunk/ Dan Skunk] on [[Fur Affinity]]

{{person-stub}}
[[Category:People]]
[[Category:Writers]]
[[Category:Poets]]
[[Category:Skunk characters]]
[[Category:Ontario]]
[[Category:1974 births]]

Dan Skunk

2010-04-19T02:23:41Z

Wolfmist:

'''Dan Skunk''' (born May 22, 1974)<ref name="DanSkunkLJP">[http://danskunk.livejournal.com/profile Dan Skunk's profile] on [[LiveJournal]]. Retrieved May 15, 2008</ref> is a [[furry]] who lives in [[Wikipedia:Oshawa|Oshawa]], Ontario, Canada.<ref name="DanSkunkLJP"/>

Dan was a furry from a very young age. Since the age of three, he would daydream about being a [[Skunk (species)|skunk]], and often felt different or wanted to be something else.<ref>[http://www.furnation.com/danskunk/ Dan Skunk's biography] on [[FurNation]]. Retrieved May 15, 2008</ref> He discovered [[furry fandom]] on Tuesday, August 19th, 2003, at 10:21 PM, when he watched ''[[Animal Imitators]]'' on TLC and discovered there were others with similar feelings to himself.

Today, Dan Skunk is very active within the [[Toronto Furry]] group {{fact}}. The original toronto-furry website, which ran was 1998 to late 2005, was reopened by Dan on [[FurNation]] in May, 2006 and became defunct in 2008.

[http://www.ontariofurries.ca Ontariofurries] is a seperate forum and site from the [http://torfur.com torfur] one.

'''-=DanSkunk by someone who doesn't fill your head with lies about himself=-'''
'''Dan Skunk's hobbies include writing poetry.

Danskunk is known for two things, the ontariofurries website and IRC channel and for his manic mood swings and mental issues. He is also know for carrying a STD and having spread it(rumors).

Recently Danskunk has been known for his personal vendetta against the Furnal Equinox Convention after he was unanimously voted off the Committee and from ever being staff.

He has made many claims to have been staff at other cons, but the truth has show he was a "volunteer" and was regated to Gopher uses. He has some staff badges, from working in Dealers den areas.

He is also known to be wearing the same grungy, falling apart shirt. He is also know for wearing his other con badges with "staff" ribbons on them etc, in an attempt to assumingly be recognized as such.

Danskunk has a habit of running away when he screws up, usually with the known words of "I feel sick, I feel tired". Usually resulting in logging off and dissapearing for a few days or a week.

Danskunk has many mental issues that cause most of this, while most is not his fault, it doesn't change the fact and reputation he has.'''

==References==
<references/>

==External links==
{{Contributor}}
* [http://danskunk.livejournal.com/ Dan Skunk] on [[LiveJournal]]
* [http://www.furnation.com/danskunk/ Dan Skunk] on [[FurNation]]
* [http://www.furaffinity.net/user/danskunk/ Dan Skunk] on [[Fur Affinity]]

{{person-stub}}
[[Category:People]]
[[Category:Writers]]
[[Category:Poets]]
[[Category:Skunk characters]]
[[Category:Ontario]]
[[Category:1974 births]]

User:Wolfmist

2010-04-19T02:20:04Z

Wolfmist: Shane - www.Torfurs.com

Shane(Previously ChronosWolf,NovemberWolf and Wolfmist) is a 35 year old furry. Having been in the fandom since 1996.
He met his one mate Dracon in 1996 on a talker on telenet, then met his other mate Blindsight online through forums at OntarioFurries.

Shane was the creator of the first "Herp MUCK" in the late 90's, called "ScaleMUCK". Which is still going today.

Shane left the fandom in 1999, after Anthrocon and a bad experience with a person named "Werwolf".
He came back to the local fandom in 2008, after attending Islington Meet, that was held on his Birthday on Nov 8.

He started to get into the local fandom through IRC and Ontariofurries forums. Where he met Blindsight a few months later.

Shane is a proud member of Furnal Equinox's committee. He servers as the Video games and Media Entertainment sections, with assisting in other roles.

Shane is also the co-owner and one of the many administrators of "Www.torfurs.com", the newest and drama free forums and soon webpage, the forums were created after the Owner and unstable powermad administrator of Ontariofurries forum,, exploded one too many times on him and many other people.

The forums have been up since last year and are slowly picking up speed and members.

He currently has worn a fursuit by a recently deceased friend and roommate "Morgan".
Buckminster was work at FCN 2010 in memorium of Morgan. He appeared in a Ghille suit, with a military cap and dogtags, holding a Weijer bought plastic gun.

He was unable to play to the camera's since the head was not made for him and he had to tilt his head to see out the eye in the side, he also had no glasses on and had to concentrate on the fursuiter in front of him.

www.torfurs.com is also the home page and supporter of the addictive and popular IRC channel #Canadianfurs, owned and run by MuneKIT.

Dan Skunk

2009-12-28T23:39:18Z

Wolfmist:

Furnal Equinox 2010

2009-12-28T18:27:29Z

Wolfmist:

'''Furnal Equinox''' is a planned furry [[convention]] located in [[Wikipedia:Toronto|Toronto, Ontario]], [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]]. The inaugural event is scheduled to take place on March 6 and 7, 2010 at the Doubletree by Hilton - Toronto Airport. Preregistration for the convention opened on Thursday, August 27th.

Furnal Equinox will be the first ever hotel-based furry convention held in the Greater Toronto Area. They have announced a Guest of Honour, artist [[Heather Bruton]] and [[BushyCat]].

Furnal Equinox will be part of a trinity of conventions starting up in 2010. Including Condition:Furry and WTF:What the Fur.

==External links==
*[http://www.furnalequinox.com Furnal Equinox website]
*[http://community.livejournal.com/furnalequinox/ LiveJournal community]
*{{con resources}}

{{Conventions}}
[[Category:Conventions]]
[[Category:Proposed conventions]]
[[Category:Ontario]]
[[Category:Canada]]
[[Category:2010 births]]

Danskunk

2009-12-28T18:26:13Z

Wolfmist: Created page with 'Danskunk is a well know furry in the GTA area. He is know for two things, the ontariofurries website and IRC channel and for his manic mood swings and mental issues. He is also …'

Danskunk is a well know furry in the GTA area.

He is know for two things, the ontariofurries website and IRC channel and for his manic mood swings and mental issues.
He is also know for carrying a STD and having spread it(rumors).

Recently Danskunk has been known for his personal vendetta against the Furnal Equinox Convention after he was unanimously voted off the Committee and from ever being staff.

He has made many claims to have been staff at other cons, but the truth has show he was a "volunteer" and was regated to Gopher uses.
He has some staff badges, from working in Dealers den areas.

He is also known to be wearing the same grungy, falling apart shirt. He is also know for wearing his other con badges with "staff" ribbons on them etc, in an attempt to assumingly be recognized as such.

Danskunk has a habit of running away when he screws up, usually with the known words of "I feel sick, I feel tired". Usually resulting in logging off and dissapearing for a few days or a week.

Danskunk has many mental issues that cause most of this, while most is not his fault, it doesn't change the fact and reputation he has.

He has also been assumed to mix his medications with alcohol.