<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://en.wikifur.com/w/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://en.wikifur.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Boingo</id>
		<title>WikiFur - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.wikifur.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Boingo"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/Boingo"/>
		<updated>2026-10-11T22:14:38Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.23.16</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation</id>
		<title>Sexual orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-25T01:44:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* Social attitudes among furries */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{cleanup}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{context}}&lt;br /&gt;
''This page is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Orphan orphaned] since few other WikiFur articles link to it. [http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/WikiFur:About You can help!]'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gay_flag.png|right|thumb|150px|The rainbow flag associated with [[wikipedia:homosexuality|homosexuality]] in and out of the [[furry fandom|fandom]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sexual orientation''' describes the gender or genders that someone feels sexually attracted to. The term '''sexual preference''' is often used interchangably, but the term '''sexual preference''' is more broad and includes personal attitudes in between the three general categories defined as '''[[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientations]]''': [[Wikipedia:Heterosexuality|'''Heterosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the opposite gender. [[Wikipedia:Bisexuality|'''Bisexuality''']] is the sexual attraction to members of both sexes, [[male]] and [[female]]. [[wikipedia:homosexuality|'''Homosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the same gender.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term '''gay''' has three different meanings. First, it is occasionally used synonymously with '''homosexual'''. Second, and most oftenly, it is used to refer specifically to [[male|male/male]] attraction while the term '''[[Wikipedia:lesbian|lesbian]]''' refers to [[female|female/female]] attraction. Third, '''gay''' is sometimes used inaccurately to refer to both homosexuals and bisexuals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[non-furry|Non-furries]] generally believe the [[stereotype]] that a significantly larger proportion of the [[furry fandom]] is homosexual or bisexual compared to the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; A lack of completely reliable survey data exists within both the fandom&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The studies that have been done suggest the [[stereotype]] is partially true, though not to the large extent that is often suggested.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Furries have suggested various theories for this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?==&lt;br /&gt;
===Fandom surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are multiple estimates of the percentage of gays in the furry fandom. It is often thought within the fandom that the number is high, possibly as high as 90%,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; but polls have shown differences in estimation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A 2007 [[Wikipedia:University of California, Davis|University of California at Davis]] study found that 37.3% of respondents were bisexual, 32.7% heterosexual, 25.5% homosexual, and 8% were [[Wikipedia:questioning (sexuality)|uncertain]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://studyf3.livejournal.com/1383.html &amp;quot;Furry Survey Results&amp;quot;] from University of California, Davis: Department of Psychology. Published 2007-05-05. Accessed 2007-05-05.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll used in ''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], showed 25% heterosexual, 19% homosexual, and 48% bisexual out of 360 peopled polled.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Sociology of Furry Fandom]. Retrieved October 19, 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rust concluded that &amp;quot;Truth be told, there are many more homosexual members of the fandom than in general society.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll (of indeterminable date, but before 2005) on the [[IFPL]] used the [[Wikipedia:Kinsey scale|Kinsey scale]] to rate the measure of homosexuality in respondents:&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin: 1em 1em 1em 0; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px #aaa solid; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 95%;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #C6E3FF&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 12.9%&lt;br /&gt;
| (63/487)&lt;br /&gt;
| 0 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively heterosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #A7B1EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.3%&lt;br /&gt;
| (89/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 1 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CBABE2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.7%&lt;br /&gt;
| (91/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, more than incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CF71EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 14.8%&lt;br /&gt;
| (72/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| Equally heterosexual and homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #DF99D4&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 11.3% &lt;br /&gt;
| (55/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 4 &lt;br /&gt;
|Predominately homosexual, more than incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #F79FD1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 16.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (78/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 5 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately homosexual, incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #FFB1D8&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 8.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (39/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 6 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively homosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* A 2006 [http://faod.org/ FAOD] poll showed 25% heterosexual, 20% homosexual, and 55% bisexual (out of 44 polled)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://faod.org/index.php?topic=179.0 FAOD Message Board]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furtopia]] poll (open 2003 to present) stated that 53% were heterosexual, 15% gay, and 30% bisexual out of 862 people polled.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://cgi.furtopia.org/cgi-bin/ib311/ikonboard.cgi?s=411086f03c728556d957bd1ffd9b528a;act=ST;f=77;t=9074 Furtopia Message Board] Retrieved September 5, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furry_Survey|poll]] by [[Alex Osaki]] reported that 42.75% were heterosexual, 16.86% were homosexual, 35.29% were bisexual, and 4.71% self-identified as neither.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey.php Furry Poll Results] as of December 30, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===General surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
Estimates of the incidence of homosexuality in the general population vary greatly, due in part to the lack of reliable survey data and the difficulty in defining [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_orientation sexual orientations].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Retrieved September 28th, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey's]] work ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male|Sexual Behavior in the Human Male]]'' found that &amp;quot;46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or &amp;quot;reacted to&amp;quot; persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives&amp;quot;. In addition, the book stated that &amp;quot;10% of males in the sample were predominantly homosexual between the ages of 16 and 55&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html Research Summary] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Kinsey's book, and its companion ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Female|Sexual Behavior in the Human Female]]'', have received [[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male#Criticism|vocal criticism]] for their findings and methodology.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/reisman.html &amp;quot;Kinsey and the Homosexual Revolution&amp;quot;] by [[Wikipedia: Judith Reisman|Dr. Judith Reisman]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.swlearning.com/quant/kohler/stat/biographical_sketches/bio15.1.html Biography of Statician] [[Wikipedia:John Tukey|John W. Tukey]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:American conservative|American conservative]] [[Wikipedia:magazine|magazine]] ''[[Wikipedia:Human Events|Human Events]]'' calls the Kinsey Report the fourth [http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=7591 Most Harmful Book of the 19th and 20th Centuries].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Catholic Church|Roman Catholic]] [[Wikipedia:Higher education in the United States|educational association]] '''[[Wikipedia:Intercollegiate Studies Institute|The Intercollegiate Studies Institute]]''' called it &amp;quot;A pervert's attempt to demonstrate that perversion is &amp;quot;statistically&amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; and the third [http://www.mmisi.org/ir/35_01/50worst.pdf &amp;quot;Worst Book of the Century&amp;quot;].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''[[Wikipedia:The New York Times|The New York Times]]'' called his research &amp;quot;conscientious and comprehensive&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pomeroy, Wardell (1972). Dr. Kinsey and the Institute for Sex Research. New York: Harper &amp;amp; Row.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Professor [[Wikipedia:Martin Duberman|Martin Duberman]] called it &amp;quot;skillful&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;a monumental endeavor&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/publications/duberman.html Book review of] '''[http://www.amazon.com/Alfred-C-Kinsey-Public-Private/dp/0393040860 Alfred C. Kinsey : A Public/Private Life]''' originally published in ''[[Wikipedia:The Nation|The Nation]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several recent surveys done in [[Wikipedia:Western world|Western countries]] such as [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]], [[Wikipedia:Australia|Australia]], and the [[Wikipedia:United States|United States]] typically define between 1% and 10% of the general population, which an average around 5%, as homosexual or bisexual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Accessed December 31, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The British government conducted a country-wide survey in 2005 as part of the [[Wikipedia:Civil_Partnership_Act_2004|''Civil Partnership Act'']]. This study, the only official government study of its kind, stated that 6% of the [[Wikipedia:United Kingdom|United Kingdom]] would be interested in forming a [[Wikipedia:civil union|civil union]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nihe.gov.uk/publications/consultation_documents/Draft%20Policy%20Statement%20on%20SO%20Dec06.pdf Sexual Orientation Policy Statement Draft for Consultation] (pdf)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Theories===&lt;br /&gt;
One viable theory involves [[Mark Merlino]], a former chair of [[ConFurence]] who co-founded the first furry [[conventions]]. [[Crush Yiff Destroy]] has suggested that Merlino actively recruited alternative lifestylers into the fandom, and that this influences furry demographics to this day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.crushyiffdestroy.com/show/merlino &amp;quot;Journey to the Center of Mark Merlino&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Furries also guess that, since having a [[non-furry]] significant other and raising children may result in a fan having less time and money to devote to the fandom, gays are over-represented because they are less likely to be raising children.{{fact}} Some speculate that the negative [[Wikipedia:social stigma|social stigma]] [[Wikipedia:Furry fandom#Media coverage|attached to the fandom]] keeps away heterosexual [[mundanes]] who would otherwise feel interested. David Rust has stated that &amp;quot;The social variations for Furries may seem unusual from a generic, American viewpoint. However, from the position of a group of people who are already predisposed to enjoying anthropomorphic animals, other concepts such as homosexuality... seem somewhat mundane and unimportant by comparison.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Others guess that gays are not over-represented, but that they are simply much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow fans than they are in other areas of their life.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
One other theory is that the demographics of the fandom is reasonably close to the general population. It just happens that people who become furries, a [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']] of sorts, become more exposed to alternate lifestyles and may reconsider their own sexuality, which might result in a paralell [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']].{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Categorization==&lt;br /&gt;
The current [[Wikipedia:scientific consensus|scientific consensus]] advocated by various social and educational organizations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;such as the [[Wikipedia:American Psychiatric Association|American Psychiatric Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Psychological Association|American Psychological Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Counseling Association|American Counseling Association]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of Social Workers|National Association of Social Workers]], the [[Wikipedia:American Academy of Pediatrics|American Academy of Pediatrics]], the [[Wikipedia:American Association of School Administrators|American Association of School Administrators]], the [[Wikipedia:American Federation of Teachers|American Federation of Teachers]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of School Psychologists|National Association of School Psychologists]], and the [[Wikipedia:National Education Association|National Education Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is that people develop their own permanent, unchangeable [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientation]] within one of the three categories in their [[Wikipedia:childhood|early childhood]] as [[Wikipedia:Biology and sexual orientation|a combination of genetic tendencies and their social environment]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/publications/justthefacts.html Just the Facts About Sexual Orientation &amp;amp; Youth: A Primer for Principals, Educators and School Personnel] 1999, American Psychological Association&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minority of researchers, sometimes known as [[Wikipedia:Queer theory|'queer theorists']], believe that the concept of sexual orientations is a [[Wikipedia:social construct|social construct]] and that people naturally exhibit a variety of attractions. [[Pressed Fur]] reports that some furries also subscribe to this view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pressedfur.coolfreepages.com/essay/postvixen/index.html &amp;quot;Sitting On the Third Side of the Fence&amp;quot;] by Hannah Kincaid from [[Pressed Fur]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although he did not advocate the social construct theory, [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey]] stated that &amp;quot;[[Males]] do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual... The living world is a continuum in each and every one of its aspects.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-hhscale.html &amp;quot;Kinsey's Heterosexual-Homosexual Rating Scale&amp;quot;] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He postulated a [[Wikipedia:Kinsey Scale|scale]] of sexual preferences from zero to six, zero being exclusively heterosexual.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social attitudes among furries==&lt;br /&gt;
''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], found that &amp;quot;race, religion and sexual orientation (as divisive factors) are simply too minor to attract any real attention&amp;quot; and that furries have &amp;quot;higher tolerance for variety in sexual orientation and activity&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A small yet significant minority of furries self-identify as [[Christian furs|Christian]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Some of them believe in the [[Wikipedia:the bible and homosexuality|traditional Christian view]] that homosexual conduct is immoral and that homosexuals should be [[Wikipedia:celibacy|celibate]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://community.livejournal.com/furrychristians/ Many furries of 'furrychristian's take this view].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Other [[Christian furs]] believe that the Bible verses and [[Wikipedia:sacred tradition|sacred traditions]] cited against homosexuality are misinterpreted.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark The furries of] '[[Rainbow Ark]]' [http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark/profile take this view]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Both sides maintain a cordial relationship with each other and try to promote mutual understanding.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; [http://www.gaychristian.net/greatdebate.php This website] summarizes the arguments in the debate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Relationship terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sociology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation</id>
		<title>Sexual orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-06T17:27:47Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{cleanup}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{context}}&lt;br /&gt;
''This page is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Orphan orphaned] since few other WikiFur articles link to it. [http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/WikiFur:About You can help!]'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gay_flag.png|right|thumb|150px|The rainbow flag associated with [[wikipedia:homosexuality|homosexuality]] in and out of the [[furry fandom|fandom]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sexual orientation''' describes the gender or genders that someone feels sexually attracted to. The term '''sexual preference''' is often used interchangably, but the term '''sexual preference''' is more broad and includes personal attitudes in between the three general categories defined as '''[[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientations]]''': [[Wikipedia:Heterosexuality|'''Heterosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the opposite gender. [[Wikipedia:Bisexuality|'''Bisexuality''']] is the sexual attraction to members of both sexes, [[male]] and [[female]]. [[wikipedia:homosexuality|'''Homosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the same gender.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term '''gay''' has three different meanings. First, it is occasionally used synonymously with '''homosexual'''. Second, and most oftenly, it is used to refer specifically to [[male|male/male]] attraction while the term '''[[Wikipedia:lesbian|lesbian]]''' refers to [[female|female/female]] attraction. Third, '''gay''' is sometimes used inaccurately to refer to both homosexuals and bisexuals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[non-furry|Non-furries]] generally believe the [[stereotype]] that a significantly larger proportion of the [[furry fandom]] is homosexual or bisexual compared to the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; A lack of completely reliable survey data exists within both the fandom&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The studies that have been done suggest the [[stereotype]] is partially true, though not to the large extent that is often suggested.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Furries have suggested various theories for this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?==&lt;br /&gt;
===Fandom surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are multiple estimates of the percentage of gays in the furry fandom. It is often thought within the fandom that the number is high, possibly as high as 90%,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; but polls have shown differences in estimation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A 2007 [[Wikipedia:University of California, Davis|University of California at Davis]] study found that 37.3% of respondents were bisexual, 32.7% heterosexual, 25.5% homosexual, and 8% were [[Wikipedia:questioning (sexuality)|uncertain]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://studyf3.livejournal.com/1383.html &amp;quot;Furry Survey Results&amp;quot;] from University of California, Davis: Department of Psychology. Published 2007-05-05. Accessed 2007-05-05.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll used in ''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], showed 25% heterosexual, 19% homosexual, and 48% bisexual out of 360 peopled polled.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Sociology of Furry Fandom]. Retrieved October 19, 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rust concluded that &amp;quot;Truth be told, there are many more homosexual members of the fandom than in general society.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll (of indeterminable date, but before 2005) on the [[IFPL]] used the [[Wikipedia:Kinsey scale|Kinsey scale]] to rate the measure of homosexuality in respondents:&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin: 1em 1em 1em 0; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px #aaa solid; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 95%;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #C6E3FF&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 12.9%&lt;br /&gt;
| (63/487)&lt;br /&gt;
| 0 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively heterosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #A7B1EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.3%&lt;br /&gt;
| (89/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 1 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CBABE2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.7%&lt;br /&gt;
| (91/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, more than incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CF71EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 14.8%&lt;br /&gt;
| (72/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| Equally heterosexual and homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #DF99D4&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 11.3% &lt;br /&gt;
| (55/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 4 &lt;br /&gt;
|Predominately homosexual, more than incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #F79FD1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 16.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (78/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 5 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately homosexual, incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #FFB1D8&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 8.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (39/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 6 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively homosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* A 2006 [http://faod.org/ FAOD] poll showed 25% heterosexual, 20% homosexual, and 55% bisexual (out of 44 polled)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://faod.org/index.php?topic=179.0 FAOD Message Board]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furtopia]] poll (open 2003 to present) stated that 53% were heterosexual, 15% gay, and 30% bisexual out of 862 people polled.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://cgi.furtopia.org/cgi-bin/ib311/ikonboard.cgi?s=411086f03c728556d957bd1ffd9b528a;act=ST;f=77;t=9074 Furtopia Message Board] Retrieved September 5, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furry_Survey|poll]] by [[Alex Osaki]] reported that 42.75% were heterosexual, 16.86% were homosexual, 35.29% were bisexual, and 4.71% self-identified as neither.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey.php Furry Poll Results] as of December 30, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===General surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
Estimates of the incidence of homosexuality in the general population vary greatly, due in part to the lack of reliable survey data and the difficulty in defining [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_orientation sexual orientations].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Retrieved September 28th, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey's]] work ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male|Sexual Behavior in the Human Male]]'' found that &amp;quot;46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or &amp;quot;reacted to&amp;quot; persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives&amp;quot;. In addition, the book stated that &amp;quot;10% of males in the sample were predominantly homosexual between the ages of 16 and 55&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html Research Summary] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Kinsey's book, and its companion ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Female|Sexual Behavior in the Human Female]]'', have received [[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male#Criticism|vocal criticism]] for their findings and methodology.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/reisman.html &amp;quot;Kinsey and the Homosexual Revolution&amp;quot;] by [[Wikipedia: Judith Reisman|Dr. Judith Reisman]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.swlearning.com/quant/kohler/stat/biographical_sketches/bio15.1.html Biography of Statician] [[Wikipedia:John Tukey|John W. Tukey]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:American conservative|American conservative]] [[Wikipedia:magazine|magazine]] ''[[Wikipedia:Human Events|Human Events]]'' calls the Kinsey Report the fourth [http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=7591 Most Harmful Book of the 19th and 20th Centuries].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Catholic Church|Roman Catholic]] [[Wikipedia:Higher education in the United States|educational association]] '''[[Wikipedia:Intercollegiate Studies Institute|The Intercollegiate Studies Institute]]''' called it &amp;quot;A pervert's attempt to demonstrate that perversion is &amp;quot;statistically&amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; and the third [http://www.mmisi.org/ir/35_01/50worst.pdf &amp;quot;Worst Book of the Century&amp;quot;].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''[[Wikipedia:The New York Times|The New York Times]]'' called his research &amp;quot;conscientious and comprehensive&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pomeroy, Wardell (1972). Dr. Kinsey and the Institute for Sex Research. New York: Harper &amp;amp; Row.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Professor [[Wikipedia:Martin Duberman|Martin Duberman]] called it &amp;quot;skillful&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;a monumental endeavor&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/publications/duberman.html Book review of] '''[http://www.amazon.com/Alfred-C-Kinsey-Public-Private/dp/0393040860 Alfred C. Kinsey : A Public/Private Life]''' originally published in ''[[Wikipedia:The Nation|The Nation]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several recent surveys done in [[Wikipedia:Western world|Western countries]] such as [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]], [[Wikipedia:Australia|Australia]], and the [[Wikipedia:United States|United States]] typically define between 1% and 10% of the general population, which an average around 5%, as homosexual or bisexual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Accessed December 31, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The British government conducted a country-wide survey in 2005 as part of the [[Wikipedia:Civil_Partnership_Act_2004|''Civil Partnership Act'']]. This study, the only official government study of its kind, stated that 6% of the [[Wikipedia:United Kingdom|United Kingdom]] would be interested in forming a [[Wikipedia:civil union|civil union]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nihe.gov.uk/publications/consultation_documents/Draft%20Policy%20Statement%20on%20SO%20Dec06.pdf Sexual Orientation Policy Statement Draft for Consultation] (pdf)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Theories===&lt;br /&gt;
One viable theory involves [[Mark Merlino]], a former chair of [[ConFurence]] who co-founded the first furry [[conventions]]. [[Crush Yiff Destroy]] has suggested that Merlino actively recruited alternative lifestylers into the fandom, and that this influences furry demographics to this day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.crushyiffdestroy.com/show/merlino &amp;quot;Journey to the Center of Mark Merlino&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Furries also guess that, since having a [[non-furry]] significant other and raising children may result in a fan having less time and money to devote to the fandom, gays are over-represented because they are less likely to be raising children.{{fact}} Some speculate that the negative [[Wikipedia:social stigma|social stigma]] [[Wikipedia:Furry fandom#Media coverage|attached to the fandom]] keeps away heterosexual [[mundanes]] who would otherwise feel interested. David Rust has stated that &amp;quot;The social variations for Furries may seem unusual from a generic, American viewpoint. However, from the position of a group of people who are already predisposed to enjoying anthropomorphic animals, other concepts such as homosexuality... seem somewhat mundane and unimportant by comparison.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Others guess that gays are not over-represented, but that they are simply much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow fans than they are in other areas of their life.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
One other theory is that the demographics of the fandom is reasonably close to the general population. It just happens that people who become furries, a [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']] of sorts, become more exposed to alternate lifestyles and may reconsider their own sexuality, which might result in a paralell [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']].{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Categorization==&lt;br /&gt;
The current [[Wikipedia:scientific consensus|scientific consensus]] advocated by various social and educational organizations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;such as the [[Wikipedia:American Psychiatric Association|American Psychiatric Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Psychological Association|American Psychological Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Counseling Association|American Counseling Association]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of Social Workers|National Association of Social Workers]], the [[Wikipedia:American Academy of Pediatrics|American Academy of Pediatrics]], the [[Wikipedia:American Association of School Administrators|American Association of School Administrators]], the [[Wikipedia:American Federation of Teachers|American Federation of Teachers]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of School Psychologists|National Association of School Psychologists]], and the [[Wikipedia:National Education Association|National Education Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is that people develop their own permanent, unchangeable [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientation]] within one of the three categories in their [[Wikipedia:childhood|early childhood]] as [[Wikipedia:Biology and sexual orientation|a combination of genetic tendencies and their social environment]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/publications/justthefacts.html Just the Facts About Sexual Orientation &amp;amp; Youth: A Primer for Principals, Educators and School Personnel] 1999, American Psychological Association&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minority of researchers, sometimes known as [[Wikipedia:Queer theory|'queer theorists']], believe that the concept of sexual orientations is a [[Wikipedia:social construct|social construct]] and that people naturally exhibit a variety of attractions. [[Pressed Fur]] reports that some furries also subscribe to this view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pressedfur.coolfreepages.com/essay/postvixen/index.html &amp;quot;Sitting On the Third Side of the Fence&amp;quot;] by Hannah Kincaid from [[Pressed Fur]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although he did not advocate the social construct theory, [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey]] stated that &amp;quot;[[Males]] do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual... The living world is a continuum in each and every one of its aspects.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-hhscale.html &amp;quot;Kinsey's Heterosexual-Homosexual Rating Scale&amp;quot;] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He postulated a [[Wikipedia:Kinsey Scale|scale]] of sexual preferences from zero to six, zero being exclusively heterosexual.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social attitudes among furries==&lt;br /&gt;
''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], found that &amp;quot;race, religion and sexual orientation (as divisive factors) are simply too minor to attract any real attention&amp;quot; and that furries have &amp;quot;higher tolerance for variety in sexual orientation and activity&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A small yet significant minority of furries self-identify as [[Christian furs|Christian]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Some of them believe in the [[Wikipedia:the bible and homosexuality|traditional Christian view]] that homosexual conduct is immoral and that homosexuals should be [[Wikipedia:celibacy|celibate]]. Other [[Christian furs]] believe that the Bible verses and [[Wikipedia:sacred tradition|sacred traditions]] cited against homosexuality are misinterpreted.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark The furries of] '[[Rainbow Ark]]' [http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark/profile take this view]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Both sides maintain a cordial relationship with each other and try to promote mutual understanding.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; [http://www.gaychristian.net/greatdebate.php This website] summarizes the arguments in the debate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Relationship terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sociology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation</id>
		<title>Sexual orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-06T17:26:15Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: modifing the lead a little bit to be consistent with the page's title&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{cleanup}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{context}}&lt;br /&gt;
''This page is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Orphan orphaned] since few other WikiFur articles link to it. [http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/WikiFur:About You can help!]'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gay_flag.png|right|thumb|150px|The rainbow flag associated with [[wikipedia:homosexuality|homosexuality]] in and out of the [[furry fandom|fandom]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sexual orientation''' describes the gender or genders that someone feels sexually attracted to. The term '''sexual preference''' is often used interchangably, but the term 'sexual preference' is more broad and includes personal attitudes in between the three general categories defined as '[[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientations]]': [[Wikipedia:Heterosexuality|'''Heterosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the opposite gender. [[Wikipedia:Bisexuality|'''Bisexuality''']] is the sexual attraction to members of both sexes, [[male]] and [[female]]. [[wikipedia:homosexuality|'''Homosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the same gender.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term '''gay''' has three different meanings. First, it is occasionally used synonymously with '''homosexual'''. Second, and most oftenly, it is used to refer specifically to [[male|male/male]] attraction while the term '''[[Wikipedia:lesbian|lesbian]]''' refers to [[female|female/female]] attraction. Third, '''gay''' is sometimes used inaccurately to refer to both homosexuals and bisexuals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[non-furry|Non-furries]] generally believe the [[stereotype]] that a significantly larger proportion of the [[furry fandom]] is homosexual or bisexual compared to the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; A lack of completely reliable survey data exists within both the fandom&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The studies that have been done suggest the [[stereotype]] is partially true, though not to the large extent that is often suggested.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Furries have suggested various theories for this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?==&lt;br /&gt;
===Fandom surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are multiple estimates of the percentage of gays in the furry fandom. It is often thought within the fandom that the number is high, possibly as high as 90%,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; but polls have shown differences in estimation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A 2007 [[Wikipedia:University of California, Davis|University of California at Davis]] study found that 37.3% of respondents were bisexual, 32.7% heterosexual, 25.5% homosexual, and 8% were [[Wikipedia:questioning (sexuality)|uncertain]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://studyf3.livejournal.com/1383.html &amp;quot;Furry Survey Results&amp;quot;] from University of California, Davis: Department of Psychology. Published 2007-05-05. Accessed 2007-05-05.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll used in ''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], showed 25% heterosexual, 19% homosexual, and 48% bisexual out of 360 peopled polled.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Sociology of Furry Fandom]. Retrieved October 19, 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rust concluded that &amp;quot;Truth be told, there are many more homosexual members of the fandom than in general society.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll (of indeterminable date, but before 2005) on the [[IFPL]] used the [[Wikipedia:Kinsey scale|Kinsey scale]] to rate the measure of homosexuality in respondents:&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin: 1em 1em 1em 0; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px #aaa solid; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 95%;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #C6E3FF&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 12.9%&lt;br /&gt;
| (63/487)&lt;br /&gt;
| 0 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively heterosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #A7B1EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.3%&lt;br /&gt;
| (89/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 1 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CBABE2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.7%&lt;br /&gt;
| (91/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, more than incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CF71EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 14.8%&lt;br /&gt;
| (72/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| Equally heterosexual and homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #DF99D4&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 11.3% &lt;br /&gt;
| (55/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 4 &lt;br /&gt;
|Predominately homosexual, more than incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #F79FD1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 16.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (78/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 5 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately homosexual, incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #FFB1D8&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 8.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (39/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 6 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively homosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* A 2006 [http://faod.org/ FAOD] poll showed 25% heterosexual, 20% homosexual, and 55% bisexual (out of 44 polled)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://faod.org/index.php?topic=179.0 FAOD Message Board]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furtopia]] poll (open 2003 to present) stated that 53% were heterosexual, 15% gay, and 30% bisexual out of 862 people polled.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://cgi.furtopia.org/cgi-bin/ib311/ikonboard.cgi?s=411086f03c728556d957bd1ffd9b528a;act=ST;f=77;t=9074 Furtopia Message Board] Retrieved September 5, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furry_Survey|poll]] by [[Alex Osaki]] reported that 42.75% were heterosexual, 16.86% were homosexual, 35.29% were bisexual, and 4.71% self-identified as neither.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey.php Furry Poll Results] as of December 30, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===General surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
Estimates of the incidence of homosexuality in the general population vary greatly, due in part to the lack of reliable survey data and the difficulty in defining [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_orientation sexual orientations].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Retrieved September 28th, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey's]] work ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male|Sexual Behavior in the Human Male]]'' found that &amp;quot;46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or &amp;quot;reacted to&amp;quot; persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives&amp;quot;. In addition, the book stated that &amp;quot;10% of males in the sample were predominantly homosexual between the ages of 16 and 55&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html Research Summary] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Kinsey's book, and its companion ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Female|Sexual Behavior in the Human Female]]'', have received [[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male#Criticism|vocal criticism]] for their findings and methodology.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/reisman.html &amp;quot;Kinsey and the Homosexual Revolution&amp;quot;] by [[Wikipedia: Judith Reisman|Dr. Judith Reisman]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.swlearning.com/quant/kohler/stat/biographical_sketches/bio15.1.html Biography of Statician] [[Wikipedia:John Tukey|John W. Tukey]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:American conservative|American conservative]] [[Wikipedia:magazine|magazine]] ''[[Wikipedia:Human Events|Human Events]]'' calls the Kinsey Report the fourth [http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=7591 Most Harmful Book of the 19th and 20th Centuries].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Catholic Church|Roman Catholic]] [[Wikipedia:Higher education in the United States|educational association]] '''[[Wikipedia:Intercollegiate Studies Institute|The Intercollegiate Studies Institute]]''' called it &amp;quot;A pervert's attempt to demonstrate that perversion is &amp;quot;statistically&amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; and the third [http://www.mmisi.org/ir/35_01/50worst.pdf &amp;quot;Worst Book of the Century&amp;quot;].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''[[Wikipedia:The New York Times|The New York Times]]'' called his research &amp;quot;conscientious and comprehensive&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pomeroy, Wardell (1972). Dr. Kinsey and the Institute for Sex Research. New York: Harper &amp;amp; Row.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Professor [[Wikipedia:Martin Duberman|Martin Duberman]] called it &amp;quot;skillful&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;a monumental endeavor&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/publications/duberman.html Book review of] '''[http://www.amazon.com/Alfred-C-Kinsey-Public-Private/dp/0393040860 Alfred C. Kinsey : A Public/Private Life]''' originally published in ''[[Wikipedia:The Nation|The Nation]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several recent surveys done in [[Wikipedia:Western world|Western countries]] such as [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]], [[Wikipedia:Australia|Australia]], and the [[Wikipedia:United States|United States]] typically define between 1% and 10% of the general population, which an average around 5%, as homosexual or bisexual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Accessed December 31, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The British government conducted a country-wide survey in 2005 as part of the [[Wikipedia:Civil_Partnership_Act_2004|''Civil Partnership Act'']]. This study, the only official government study of its kind, stated that 6% of the [[Wikipedia:United Kingdom|United Kingdom]] would be interested in forming a [[Wikipedia:civil union|civil union]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nihe.gov.uk/publications/consultation_documents/Draft%20Policy%20Statement%20on%20SO%20Dec06.pdf Sexual Orientation Policy Statement Draft for Consultation] (pdf)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Theories===&lt;br /&gt;
One viable theory involves [[Mark Merlino]], a former chair of [[ConFurence]] who co-founded the first furry [[conventions]]. [[Crush Yiff Destroy]] has suggested that Merlino actively recruited alternative lifestylers into the fandom, and that this influences furry demographics to this day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.crushyiffdestroy.com/show/merlino &amp;quot;Journey to the Center of Mark Merlino&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Furries also guess that, since having a [[non-furry]] significant other and raising children may result in a fan having less time and money to devote to the fandom, gays are over-represented because they are less likely to be raising children.{{fact}} Some speculate that the negative [[Wikipedia:social stigma|social stigma]] [[Wikipedia:Furry fandom#Media coverage|attached to the fandom]] keeps away heterosexual [[mundanes]] who would otherwise feel interested. David Rust has stated that &amp;quot;The social variations for Furries may seem unusual from a generic, American viewpoint. However, from the position of a group of people who are already predisposed to enjoying anthropomorphic animals, other concepts such as homosexuality... seem somewhat mundane and unimportant by comparison.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Others guess that gays are not over-represented, but that they are simply much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow fans than they are in other areas of their life.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
One other theory is that the demographics of the fandom is reasonably close to the general population. It just happens that people who become furries, a [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']] of sorts, become more exposed to alternate lifestyles and may reconsider their own sexuality, which might result in a paralell [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']].{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Categorization==&lt;br /&gt;
The current [[Wikipedia:scientific consensus|scientific consensus]] advocated by various social and educational organizations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;such as the [[Wikipedia:American Psychiatric Association|American Psychiatric Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Psychological Association|American Psychological Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Counseling Association|American Counseling Association]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of Social Workers|National Association of Social Workers]], the [[Wikipedia:American Academy of Pediatrics|American Academy of Pediatrics]], the [[Wikipedia:American Association of School Administrators|American Association of School Administrators]], the [[Wikipedia:American Federation of Teachers|American Federation of Teachers]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of School Psychologists|National Association of School Psychologists]], and the [[Wikipedia:National Education Association|National Education Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is that people develop their own permanent, unchangeable [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientation]] within one of the three categories in their [[Wikipedia:childhood|early childhood]] as [[Wikipedia:Biology and sexual orientation|a combination of genetic tendencies and their social environment]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/publications/justthefacts.html Just the Facts About Sexual Orientation &amp;amp; Youth: A Primer for Principals, Educators and School Personnel] 1999, American Psychological Association&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minority of researchers, sometimes known as [[Wikipedia:Queer theory|'queer theorists']], believe that the concept of sexual orientations is a [[Wikipedia:social construct|social construct]] and that people naturally exhibit a variety of attractions. [[Pressed Fur]] reports that some furries also subscribe to this view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pressedfur.coolfreepages.com/essay/postvixen/index.html &amp;quot;Sitting On the Third Side of the Fence&amp;quot;] by Hannah Kincaid from [[Pressed Fur]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although he did not advocate the social construct theory, [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey]] stated that &amp;quot;[[Males]] do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual... The living world is a continuum in each and every one of its aspects.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-hhscale.html &amp;quot;Kinsey's Heterosexual-Homosexual Rating Scale&amp;quot;] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He postulated a [[Wikipedia:Kinsey Scale|scale]] of sexual preferences from zero to six, zero being exclusively heterosexual.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social attitudes among furries==&lt;br /&gt;
''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], found that &amp;quot;race, religion and sexual orientation (as divisive factors) are simply too minor to attract any real attention&amp;quot; and that furries have &amp;quot;higher tolerance for variety in sexual orientation and activity&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A small yet significant minority of furries self-identify as [[Christian furs|Christian]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Some of them believe in the [[Wikipedia:the bible and homosexuality|traditional Christian view]] that homosexual conduct is immoral and that homosexuals should be [[Wikipedia:celibacy|celibate]]. Other [[Christian furs]] believe that the Bible verses and [[Wikipedia:sacred tradition|sacred traditions]] cited against homosexuality are misinterpreted.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark The furries of] '[[Rainbow Ark]]' [http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark/profile take this view]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Both sides maintain a cordial relationship with each other and try to promote mutual understanding.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; [http://www.gaychristian.net/greatdebate.php This website] summarizes the arguments in the debate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Relationship terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sociology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Sexual_orientation</id>
		<title>Talk:Sexual orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Sexual_orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-06T04:02:00Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* Is it too far out... */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Sorry, that last edit was me.  --Brody&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Incorrect data==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just added all of the percentages together on the Kinsey scale chart because I was thinking about making a cumulative frequency table for it or something, but I found that the percentages only add up to 97% when they should add up to 100%, so could we correct this please? Thanks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
| Kinsey rank&lt;br /&gt;
| Percentage&lt;br /&gt;
| Cumulative freq.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| 12&lt;br /&gt;
| 12&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| 18&lt;br /&gt;
| 30&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| 18&lt;br /&gt;
| 48&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| 14&lt;br /&gt;
| 62&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4&lt;br /&gt;
| 11&lt;br /&gt;
| 73&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5&lt;br /&gt;
| 16&lt;br /&gt;
| 89&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6&lt;br /&gt;
| 8&lt;br /&gt;
| 97&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Total:&lt;br /&gt;
| 97%&lt;br /&gt;
| 97%&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Shia|Shia]] 17:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's just because they've been rounded down (like 12.9 -&amp;gt; 12). I'll add in the decimal points. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:04, 29 May 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FAOD Poll ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is a web-poll with 44 responses statistically solid?  Granted it's always difficult to get well-sampled and unbiased results about highly personal topics, but with fewer than a hundred or so responses and the fact that polls within a community tend to be unavoidably self-selecting there's so much potential bias in either direction that they could arguably be considered anecdotal. --[[User:Riismo|Riismo]] 22:21, 5 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some observations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are a few observations and speculations I've made regarding homosexuality in furry fandom.  Feel free to mull over these and offer any suggestions on whether you think they're accurate or not, and if so, whether they should be incorporated into the article (I am using the term &amp;quot;gays&amp;quot; throughout to represent both genders):&lt;br /&gt;
*The polls quoted here, and at least one other I'm aware of, suggest that the proportion of gays in furry fandom is approximately three times the proportion of gays in the general population;&lt;br /&gt;
*If that figure seems low, I can think of a few reasons why it might seem to be much higher:&lt;br /&gt;
**Gays are much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow furry fans than they are in other areas of their life, such as school and the workplace.  Statistically it may be true that 5-10% of the people at my workplace are gay, but I seldom find out who they are.  The proportion of gays among furries may only be 3x what it is in my workplace, but the proportion of gays ''that I know about'' is far greater;&lt;br /&gt;
**Having a non-furry S.O. and having children (whether natural, adopted, or foster) are two factors that often result in a fan having less time and money to devote to things furry, and having to limit one's involvement due to other priorities.  Gays are more likely than straight folk to have an S.O. who is also a furry fan, and are less likely than straight folk to be raising children  (Granted, every individual's situation is different, but averaged over a large number of people I would be surprised if this is not the case);&lt;br /&gt;
*Gays already have to deal with the idea that one major area of their lives goes against what is considered normal by a large segment of society.  As such, the idea of having an interest that some would consider unusual or weird is not as big a leap as it is for someone who hasn't been down that road;&lt;br /&gt;
*How much greater is the awareness of the existence of furry fandom among gays compared to straights?  I honestly don't know, but if more people among any demographic (such as gays) knows of the existence of furry fandom, it follows that more people from among that group would become furry fans.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 20:05, 10 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some thoughts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Wouldn't it be nice if the table had each row color-coded? With the top one a certain solid color, the bottom one another solid color, and the middle row a blend of the two? I suggest a red-blue or a yellow-blue pattern.* I have no idea how to do this, but the syntax might be on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Table#Examples this wiki help page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Dr.Kinsey's ''Sexual Behavior in the Human Male'' found that &amp;quot;46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or &amp;quot;reacted to&amp;quot; persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives&amp;quot;. In addition, &amp;quot;Kinsey said in both the Male and Female volumes that it was impossible to determine the number of persons who are &amp;quot;homosexual&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;heterosexual&amp;quot;. It was only possible to determine behavior at any given time&amp;quot;- &amp;quot;10% of males in the sample were predominantly homosexual between the ages of 16 and 55&amp;quot;. See [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Am I arguing that furry fandom is represenative of the general population? No. However, I think that the article really needs some necessary context. In the world [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAH_mjLhreE that most people live in], someone with the genetic background/social background of a 1/2, 1, 2, or a 2 1/2- et cetera- would probably self-identify as 'straight' throughout their life. The same might not be true for furries.** &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; One could argue that the color red signifies 'bad' or the color yellow signifies 'sickly'. I don't know. It's just a suggestion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;**&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; I say &amp;quot;might&amp;quot; because, well, how would [[mundane|I]] know?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 05:13, 26 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gay-&amp;gt;Sexual preference? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This use to be the [[Gay]] article (?.) Why try to overwrite the original entry with another subject instead of starting a new one (&amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot;,) and migrate the pertinent (&amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot;) data to it?. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, you got an article with several subjects/ideas/opinions trying to make a (several) point(s) while making none (i.e &amp;quot;''the term 'sexual preference' is more broad and includes personal attitudes in between the '''three''' general categories defined as sexual orientations,...''&amp;quot; Three, but the following paragraph now lists five,)...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article seems to be in a dire need of a top to bottom cleanup/revamp =P [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 01:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:...And, why so many redirects for a single article? ¬_¬ [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 01:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I merged 'heterosexual' and 'bisexual' into 'homosexual' since the two articles were one-/two-sentences stubs with little hope of future content. None of the information that was in the original 'homosexual' article has been removed. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 01:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't see what specifically needs to be cleaned-up besides the lead paragraph, which I fiddled with a little bit. What sections need revising? [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 02:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::In very simple terms:&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Lead paragraph''': What Sexual preference is (very brief initial description of a mainstream term/concept.) &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Lesbianism&amp;quot; '''is''' '''homosexuality.''' The addition of &amp;quot;Asexuals&amp;quot; is splitting hairs, and going beyond the furry point of the article (specially if we are making the initial point of only &amp;quot;three&amp;quot; types of &amp;quot;sexual preferences.&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Sexual preferences and furry''' section: An explanation of how does &amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot; related to furry, with the &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; topic the most discussed/best known angle. The initial article (&amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot;) covered the concept, myth and stereotyping of homosexuality in regard to the fandom from this point on, but that point broke when the article moved to cover &amp;quot;sexual preference,&amp;quot; so we get directed immediately to the established gay views of &amp;quot;Non-furries&amp;quot; and fandom, and a lack of studies on &amp;quot;homosexuality&amp;quot; in it, and the general populace. By the end of this article there's still no explanation or correlation between &amp;quot;Sexual preference and furry.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Categorization''' section: All related (exclusively) to the &amp;quot;gay&amp;quot; sexual preference, but nothing to tie it to it's relation to the furry fandom, or &amp;quot;sexual preferences&amp;quot; in general for that matter.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Social attitudes among furries''': Again, solely concentrated around the social and religious attitude of &amp;quot;gay sexuality&amp;quot; within the fandom (the &amp;quot;heterosexual,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;bisexual,&amp;quot; and for that matter, &amp;quot;asexual&amp;quot; sexual preference views have yet to make an appearance, if you noticed.)&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?''' (or '''Homosexuality within the fandom''') section: A good section to follow '''after''' establishing the types of &amp;quot;Sexual preferences&amp;quot; in furry. Move the &amp;quot;non-furry&amp;quot; opinion to it under, maybe, '''A non-furry view of Homosexuality and furry'''.	&lt;br /&gt;
**'''General surveys''' section. Why?. This can easily be integrated inside the '''Fandom surveys''' section (we are still trying to show the furry's angle on this article, no mainstream's.)	&lt;br /&gt;
::::So, as it stands right now, we are not presenting how &amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot; relates to furry fandom accurately right now. Plenty regarding &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; sexual preferences, but that's because that the article was originally about it and furry, before it being renamed. [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 03:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Good points all. The article still needs expansion.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Some thoughts:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The '''Sexual preferences and furry''' section was intially part of the introduction. I don't know how the stuff in the lead section that's about the furry=gay idea got moved into it's own section. If it was a edit done by me, it was a mistake.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I added 'asexual' to the description after finding out that [http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Search?search=asexual at least three popular furries] are 'asexual'. But if it's rare, it shouldn't really be mentioned in the article at all.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I know that '''gay''' means '''homosexual''', but the term '''gay''' is also used a lot to describe all non-straight people-- homosexuals and bisexuals alike.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The '''categorization''' section is 'furry'-relevent since some furries believe that the gay\straight and male/female dictomy is false and think that people can express a variety of attractions throughout their life. The section does need rewording to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''Social attitudes among furries''': Furries are people, and- like people-, some furries are homophobic. This should be mentioned. The section does have a weak title, though. A clearer title would be '''homophobia among furries''', but I didn't use that because I really hate stamping the pejorative political label 'homophobic' on furries who are just exercising their sincerely held religious beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?''': I agree that this belongs right below the introduction. I also think that the '''general surveys''' subsection about non-furries should be seperate from the '''fandom surveys''' subsection since the entire point is to illustrate the contrast.  [[User:24.32.208.58|24.32.208.58]] 07:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Why not have a lot of redirects? The words being re-directed- Sexual orientation, Sexual orientations, Sexual Preferences, homosexuals, homosexuality, gay, gays, et cetera- all fall clearly under this article. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 02:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::'''Gay''', makes sense, '''Homosexual''', yes, '''Homoerotic''', kind of redundant, but...; '''Gays''', uh, that's covered by &amp;quot;Gay,&amp;quot; just enter it on the search box, it will come up; '''Homosexuals''',... all right, getting to &amp;quot;Redundant City&amp;quot; pluralized territory. In other words, we don't need to cover with redirects such a well known, mainstream term. =P [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 03:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The fact that 'homoerotic' redirects here is news to me. That should be changed. The plural redirects are redundant, yes, but I guess I'm used to it from having done it in Wikipedia editing when plurals might generate unhelpful searches. [[User:24.32.208.58|24.32.208.58]] 07:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I edited the lead section so it is now structured more simply and more logically. It mentions the three orientations, then it describes those three orientations, then it describes the term 'gay'- which has three different meanings-, and then it describes the rare exception to all orientations. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 02:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::...Which still presents this article as one about &amp;quot;gay&amp;quot; sexual preferences, not about &amp;quot;sexual preferences&amp;quot; and its relation to furry. This breakdown of the definition of &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; would be more at home on the '''Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?''' (or '''Homosexuality within the fandom''', or simply, '''Homosexuality and furry''') section. [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 03:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''Which still presents this article as one about &amp;quot;gay&amp;quot; sexual preferences'' How so? The intro defines the term 'sexual preference' in detail, then it notes the multiple definitions of 'gay', and then it says what the sexual preferences in the fandom are (or at least it did, until those sentences were moved for some reason).&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''So, as it stands right now, we are not presenting how &amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot; relates to furry fandom accurately right now. Plenty regarding &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; sexual preferences'' In real life, 95% of people are straight. In the fandom, it's between a low of 13% or a high of 53%. The article is gay-centric because, well, most furries are gay. [[User:24.32.208.58|24.32.208.58]] 07:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Regardless, your central point about the sections being jumbled up is definately right. [[User:24.32.208.58|24.32.208.58]] 07:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I moved around the sections. I think that the article flows better now. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 00:05, 4 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Well, no, the plurality are '''bi''' according to the stats. &amp;quot;Most&amp;quot; (the majority) are ''not straight'', but that's different to being gay. :-) --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:19, 4 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Ah, yes, I meant ''not straight''. Anyways, do you think the sections are in proper order or do you think they need to be moved around? [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 03:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Preference or orientation? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should this article be retitled ''Sexual orientation''?  The reason I ask is because certain anti-gay factions prefer the term &amp;quot;sexual preference&amp;quot; over &amp;quot;sexual orientation&amp;quot; because the former carries a stronger implication that being gay or lesbian is a choice. --[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 14:10, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To be honest, it seems like nitpicking to me. I don't think that the term 'sexual preference' implies choice. My [[Wikipedia:Modern liberalism in the United States|very-liberal]] college president recently used the term in a speech before our diversity department. Still, I don't have much of an opinion on it.&lt;br /&gt;
:The reason why I used the title 'sexual preference' for this article since I wanted this article to prominently include the survey that mapped furries on the [[Wikipedia:Kinsey scale|Kinsey scale]], which measures preferences rather than orientations. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 00:21, 4 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Sexual orientation&amp;quot; is by far the more standard term, I believe. I have a copy of ''The Kinsey Institute New Report On Sex'' (Copyright 1990 The Kinsey Institute for  Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction) to hand, and it refers to the Kinsey scale of sexual orientation. -- [[User:Sine|Sine]] 07:13, 4 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's kind of a moot point since I don't oppose renaming the article, but how does that report define 'sexual orientation'? Is 0-1 considered straight, 2-4 bi, and 5-6 homosexual; or is each number given it's own definition? [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 03:45, 6 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Is it too far out... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the article to mention the theory that the sexual orientations of furries is reasonably similar to the general population? I know that the Kinsey survey-- 46% bisexual and 10% homosexual-- sort of parallels the Rust survey-- 19% homosexual and 48% bisexual, but the other surveys don't. And, of course, this is all original research. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 04:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Sexual_orientation</id>
		<title>Talk:Sexual orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Sexual_orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-06T03:45:23Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* Preference or orientation? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Sorry, that last edit was me.  --Brody&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Incorrect data==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just added all of the percentages together on the Kinsey scale chart because I was thinking about making a cumulative frequency table for it or something, but I found that the percentages only add up to 97% when they should add up to 100%, so could we correct this please? Thanks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
| Kinsey rank&lt;br /&gt;
| Percentage&lt;br /&gt;
| Cumulative freq.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| 12&lt;br /&gt;
| 12&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| 18&lt;br /&gt;
| 30&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| 18&lt;br /&gt;
| 48&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| 14&lt;br /&gt;
| 62&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4&lt;br /&gt;
| 11&lt;br /&gt;
| 73&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5&lt;br /&gt;
| 16&lt;br /&gt;
| 89&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6&lt;br /&gt;
| 8&lt;br /&gt;
| 97&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Total:&lt;br /&gt;
| 97%&lt;br /&gt;
| 97%&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Shia|Shia]] 17:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's just because they've been rounded down (like 12.9 -&amp;gt; 12). I'll add in the decimal points. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:04, 29 May 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FAOD Poll ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is a web-poll with 44 responses statistically solid?  Granted it's always difficult to get well-sampled and unbiased results about highly personal topics, but with fewer than a hundred or so responses and the fact that polls within a community tend to be unavoidably self-selecting there's so much potential bias in either direction that they could arguably be considered anecdotal. --[[User:Riismo|Riismo]] 22:21, 5 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some observations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are a few observations and speculations I've made regarding homosexuality in furry fandom.  Feel free to mull over these and offer any suggestions on whether you think they're accurate or not, and if so, whether they should be incorporated into the article (I am using the term &amp;quot;gays&amp;quot; throughout to represent both genders):&lt;br /&gt;
*The polls quoted here, and at least one other I'm aware of, suggest that the proportion of gays in furry fandom is approximately three times the proportion of gays in the general population;&lt;br /&gt;
*If that figure seems low, I can think of a few reasons why it might seem to be much higher:&lt;br /&gt;
**Gays are much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow furry fans than they are in other areas of their life, such as school and the workplace.  Statistically it may be true that 5-10% of the people at my workplace are gay, but I seldom find out who they are.  The proportion of gays among furries may only be 3x what it is in my workplace, but the proportion of gays ''that I know about'' is far greater;&lt;br /&gt;
**Having a non-furry S.O. and having children (whether natural, adopted, or foster) are two factors that often result in a fan having less time and money to devote to things furry, and having to limit one's involvement due to other priorities.  Gays are more likely than straight folk to have an S.O. who is also a furry fan, and are less likely than straight folk to be raising children  (Granted, every individual's situation is different, but averaged over a large number of people I would be surprised if this is not the case);&lt;br /&gt;
*Gays already have to deal with the idea that one major area of their lives goes against what is considered normal by a large segment of society.  As such, the idea of having an interest that some would consider unusual or weird is not as big a leap as it is for someone who hasn't been down that road;&lt;br /&gt;
*How much greater is the awareness of the existence of furry fandom among gays compared to straights?  I honestly don't know, but if more people among any demographic (such as gays) knows of the existence of furry fandom, it follows that more people from among that group would become furry fans.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 20:05, 10 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some thoughts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Wouldn't it be nice if the table had each row color-coded? With the top one a certain solid color, the bottom one another solid color, and the middle row a blend of the two? I suggest a red-blue or a yellow-blue pattern.* I have no idea how to do this, but the syntax might be on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Table#Examples this wiki help page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Dr.Kinsey's ''Sexual Behavior in the Human Male'' found that &amp;quot;46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or &amp;quot;reacted to&amp;quot; persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives&amp;quot;. In addition, &amp;quot;Kinsey said in both the Male and Female volumes that it was impossible to determine the number of persons who are &amp;quot;homosexual&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;heterosexual&amp;quot;. It was only possible to determine behavior at any given time&amp;quot;- &amp;quot;10% of males in the sample were predominantly homosexual between the ages of 16 and 55&amp;quot;. See [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Am I arguing that furry fandom is represenative of the general population? No. However, I think that the article really needs some necessary context. In the world [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAH_mjLhreE that most people live in], someone with the genetic background/social background of a 1/2, 1, 2, or a 2 1/2- et cetera- would probably self-identify as 'straight' throughout their life. The same might not be true for furries.** &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; One could argue that the color red signifies 'bad' or the color yellow signifies 'sickly'. I don't know. It's just a suggestion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;**&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; I say &amp;quot;might&amp;quot; because, well, how would [[mundane|I]] know?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 05:13, 26 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gay-&amp;gt;Sexual preference? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This use to be the [[Gay]] article (?.) Why try to overwrite the original entry with another subject instead of starting a new one (&amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot;,) and migrate the pertinent (&amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot;) data to it?. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, you got an article with several subjects/ideas/opinions trying to make a (several) point(s) while making none (i.e &amp;quot;''the term 'sexual preference' is more broad and includes personal attitudes in between the '''three''' general categories defined as sexual orientations,...''&amp;quot; Three, but the following paragraph now lists five,)...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article seems to be in a dire need of a top to bottom cleanup/revamp =P [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 01:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:...And, why so many redirects for a single article? ¬_¬ [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 01:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I merged 'heterosexual' and 'bisexual' into 'homosexual' since the two articles were one-/two-sentences stubs with little hope of future content. None of the information that was in the original 'homosexual' article has been removed. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 01:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't see what specifically needs to be cleaned-up besides the lead paragraph, which I fiddled with a little bit. What sections need revising? [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 02:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::In very simple terms:&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Lead paragraph''': What Sexual preference is (very brief initial description of a mainstream term/concept.) &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Lesbianism&amp;quot; '''is''' '''homosexuality.''' The addition of &amp;quot;Asexuals&amp;quot; is splitting hairs, and going beyond the furry point of the article (specially if we are making the initial point of only &amp;quot;three&amp;quot; types of &amp;quot;sexual preferences.&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Sexual preferences and furry''' section: An explanation of how does &amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot; related to furry, with the &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; topic the most discussed/best known angle. The initial article (&amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot;) covered the concept, myth and stereotyping of homosexuality in regard to the fandom from this point on, but that point broke when the article moved to cover &amp;quot;sexual preference,&amp;quot; so we get directed immediately to the established gay views of &amp;quot;Non-furries&amp;quot; and fandom, and a lack of studies on &amp;quot;homosexuality&amp;quot; in it, and the general populace. By the end of this article there's still no explanation or correlation between &amp;quot;Sexual preference and furry.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Categorization''' section: All related (exclusively) to the &amp;quot;gay&amp;quot; sexual preference, but nothing to tie it to it's relation to the furry fandom, or &amp;quot;sexual preferences&amp;quot; in general for that matter.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Social attitudes among furries''': Again, solely concentrated around the social and religious attitude of &amp;quot;gay sexuality&amp;quot; within the fandom (the &amp;quot;heterosexual,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;bisexual,&amp;quot; and for that matter, &amp;quot;asexual&amp;quot; sexual preference views have yet to make an appearance, if you noticed.)&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?''' (or '''Homosexuality within the fandom''') section: A good section to follow '''after''' establishing the types of &amp;quot;Sexual preferences&amp;quot; in furry. Move the &amp;quot;non-furry&amp;quot; opinion to it under, maybe, '''A non-furry view of Homosexuality and furry'''.	&lt;br /&gt;
**'''General surveys''' section. Why?. This can easily be integrated inside the '''Fandom surveys''' section (we are still trying to show the furry's angle on this article, no mainstream's.)	&lt;br /&gt;
::::So, as it stands right now, we are not presenting how &amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot; relates to furry fandom accurately right now. Plenty regarding &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; sexual preferences, but that's because that the article was originally about it and furry, before it being renamed. [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 03:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Good points all. The article still needs expansion.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Some thoughts:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The '''Sexual preferences and furry''' section was intially part of the introduction. I don't know how the stuff in the lead section that's about the furry=gay idea got moved into it's own section. If it was a edit done by me, it was a mistake.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I added 'asexual' to the description after finding out that [http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Search?search=asexual at least three popular furries] are 'asexual'. But if it's rare, it shouldn't really be mentioned in the article at all.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I know that '''gay''' means '''homosexual''', but the term '''gay''' is also used a lot to describe all non-straight people-- homosexuals and bisexuals alike.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The '''categorization''' section is 'furry'-relevent since some furries believe that the gay\straight and male/female dictomy is false and think that people can express a variety of attractions throughout their life. The section does need rewording to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''Social attitudes among furries''': Furries are people, and- like people-, some furries are homophobic. This should be mentioned. The section does have a weak title, though. A clearer title would be '''homophobia among furries''', but I didn't use that because I really hate stamping the pejorative political label 'homophobic' on furries who are just exercising their sincerely held religious beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?''': I agree that this belongs right below the introduction. I also think that the '''general surveys''' subsection about non-furries should be seperate from the '''fandom surveys''' subsection since the entire point is to illustrate the contrast.  [[User:24.32.208.58|24.32.208.58]] 07:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Why not have a lot of redirects? The words being re-directed- Sexual orientation, Sexual orientations, Sexual Preferences, homosexuals, homosexuality, gay, gays, et cetera- all fall clearly under this article. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 02:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::'''Gay''', makes sense, '''Homosexual''', yes, '''Homoerotic''', kind of redundant, but...; '''Gays''', uh, that's covered by &amp;quot;Gay,&amp;quot; just enter it on the search box, it will come up; '''Homosexuals''',... all right, getting to &amp;quot;Redundant City&amp;quot; pluralized territory. In other words, we don't need to cover with redirects such a well known, mainstream term. =P [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 03:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The fact that 'homoerotic' redirects here is news to me. That should be changed. The plural redirects are redundant, yes, but I guess I'm used to it from having done it in Wikipedia editing when plurals might generate unhelpful searches. [[User:24.32.208.58|24.32.208.58]] 07:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I edited the lead section so it is now structured more simply and more logically. It mentions the three orientations, then it describes those three orientations, then it describes the term 'gay'- which has three different meanings-, and then it describes the rare exception to all orientations. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 02:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::...Which still presents this article as one about &amp;quot;gay&amp;quot; sexual preferences, not about &amp;quot;sexual preferences&amp;quot; and its relation to furry. This breakdown of the definition of &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; would be more at home on the '''Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?''' (or '''Homosexuality within the fandom''', or simply, '''Homosexuality and furry''') section. [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 03:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''Which still presents this article as one about &amp;quot;gay&amp;quot; sexual preferences'' How so? The intro defines the term 'sexual preference' in detail, then it notes the multiple definitions of 'gay', and then it says what the sexual preferences in the fandom are (or at least it did, until those sentences were moved for some reason).&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''So, as it stands right now, we are not presenting how &amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot; relates to furry fandom accurately right now. Plenty regarding &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; sexual preferences'' In real life, 95% of people are straight. In the fandom, it's between a low of 13% or a high of 53%. The article is gay-centric because, well, most furries are gay. [[User:24.32.208.58|24.32.208.58]] 07:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Regardless, your central point about the sections being jumbled up is definately right. [[User:24.32.208.58|24.32.208.58]] 07:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I moved around the sections. I think that the article flows better now. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 00:05, 4 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Well, no, the plurality are '''bi''' according to the stats. &amp;quot;Most&amp;quot; (the majority) are ''not straight'', but that's different to being gay. :-) --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:19, 4 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Ah, yes, I meant ''not straight''. Anyways, do you think the sections are in proper order or do you think they need to be moved around? [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 03:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Preference or orientation? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should this article be retitled ''Sexual orientation''?  The reason I ask is because certain anti-gay factions prefer the term &amp;quot;sexual preference&amp;quot; over &amp;quot;sexual orientation&amp;quot; because the former carries a stronger implication that being gay or lesbian is a choice. --[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 14:10, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To be honest, it seems like nitpicking to me. I don't think that the term 'sexual preference' implies choice. My [[Wikipedia:Modern liberalism in the United States|very-liberal]] college president recently used the term in a speech before our diversity department. Still, I don't have much of an opinion on it.&lt;br /&gt;
:The reason why I used the title 'sexual preference' for this article since I wanted this article to prominently include the survey that mapped furries on the [[Wikipedia:Kinsey scale|Kinsey scale]], which measures preferences rather than orientations. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 00:21, 4 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Sexual orientation&amp;quot; is by far the more standard term, I believe. I have a copy of ''The Kinsey Institute New Report On Sex'' (Copyright 1990 The Kinsey Institute for  Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction) to hand, and it refers to the Kinsey scale of sexual orientation. -- [[User:Sine|Sine]] 07:13, 4 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's kind of a moot point since I don't oppose renaming the article, but how does that report define 'sexual orientation'? Is 0-1 considered straight, 2-4 bi, and 5-6 homosexual; or is each number given it's own definition? [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 03:45, 6 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Sexual_orientation</id>
		<title>Talk:Sexual orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Sexual_orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-06T03:39:42Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* Gay-&amp;gt;Sexual preference? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Sorry, that last edit was me.  --Brody&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Incorrect data==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just added all of the percentages together on the Kinsey scale chart because I was thinking about making a cumulative frequency table for it or something, but I found that the percentages only add up to 97% when they should add up to 100%, so could we correct this please? Thanks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
| Kinsey rank&lt;br /&gt;
| Percentage&lt;br /&gt;
| Cumulative freq.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| 12&lt;br /&gt;
| 12&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| 18&lt;br /&gt;
| 30&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| 18&lt;br /&gt;
| 48&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| 14&lt;br /&gt;
| 62&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4&lt;br /&gt;
| 11&lt;br /&gt;
| 73&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5&lt;br /&gt;
| 16&lt;br /&gt;
| 89&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6&lt;br /&gt;
| 8&lt;br /&gt;
| 97&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Total:&lt;br /&gt;
| 97%&lt;br /&gt;
| 97%&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Shia|Shia]] 17:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's just because they've been rounded down (like 12.9 -&amp;gt; 12). I'll add in the decimal points. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:04, 29 May 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FAOD Poll ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is a web-poll with 44 responses statistically solid?  Granted it's always difficult to get well-sampled and unbiased results about highly personal topics, but with fewer than a hundred or so responses and the fact that polls within a community tend to be unavoidably self-selecting there's so much potential bias in either direction that they could arguably be considered anecdotal. --[[User:Riismo|Riismo]] 22:21, 5 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some observations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are a few observations and speculations I've made regarding homosexuality in furry fandom.  Feel free to mull over these and offer any suggestions on whether you think they're accurate or not, and if so, whether they should be incorporated into the article (I am using the term &amp;quot;gays&amp;quot; throughout to represent both genders):&lt;br /&gt;
*The polls quoted here, and at least one other I'm aware of, suggest that the proportion of gays in furry fandom is approximately three times the proportion of gays in the general population;&lt;br /&gt;
*If that figure seems low, I can think of a few reasons why it might seem to be much higher:&lt;br /&gt;
**Gays are much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow furry fans than they are in other areas of their life, such as school and the workplace.  Statistically it may be true that 5-10% of the people at my workplace are gay, but I seldom find out who they are.  The proportion of gays among furries may only be 3x what it is in my workplace, but the proportion of gays ''that I know about'' is far greater;&lt;br /&gt;
**Having a non-furry S.O. and having children (whether natural, adopted, or foster) are two factors that often result in a fan having less time and money to devote to things furry, and having to limit one's involvement due to other priorities.  Gays are more likely than straight folk to have an S.O. who is also a furry fan, and are less likely than straight folk to be raising children  (Granted, every individual's situation is different, but averaged over a large number of people I would be surprised if this is not the case);&lt;br /&gt;
*Gays already have to deal with the idea that one major area of their lives goes against what is considered normal by a large segment of society.  As such, the idea of having an interest that some would consider unusual or weird is not as big a leap as it is for someone who hasn't been down that road;&lt;br /&gt;
*How much greater is the awareness of the existence of furry fandom among gays compared to straights?  I honestly don't know, but if more people among any demographic (such as gays) knows of the existence of furry fandom, it follows that more people from among that group would become furry fans.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 20:05, 10 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some thoughts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Wouldn't it be nice if the table had each row color-coded? With the top one a certain solid color, the bottom one another solid color, and the middle row a blend of the two? I suggest a red-blue or a yellow-blue pattern.* I have no idea how to do this, but the syntax might be on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Table#Examples this wiki help page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Dr.Kinsey's ''Sexual Behavior in the Human Male'' found that &amp;quot;46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or &amp;quot;reacted to&amp;quot; persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives&amp;quot;. In addition, &amp;quot;Kinsey said in both the Male and Female volumes that it was impossible to determine the number of persons who are &amp;quot;homosexual&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;heterosexual&amp;quot;. It was only possible to determine behavior at any given time&amp;quot;- &amp;quot;10% of males in the sample were predominantly homosexual between the ages of 16 and 55&amp;quot;. See [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Am I arguing that furry fandom is represenative of the general population? No. However, I think that the article really needs some necessary context. In the world [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAH_mjLhreE that most people live in], someone with the genetic background/social background of a 1/2, 1, 2, or a 2 1/2- et cetera- would probably self-identify as 'straight' throughout their life. The same might not be true for furries.** &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; One could argue that the color red signifies 'bad' or the color yellow signifies 'sickly'. I don't know. It's just a suggestion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;**&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; I say &amp;quot;might&amp;quot; because, well, how would [[mundane|I]] know?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 05:13, 26 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gay-&amp;gt;Sexual preference? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This use to be the [[Gay]] article (?.) Why try to overwrite the original entry with another subject instead of starting a new one (&amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot;,) and migrate the pertinent (&amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot;) data to it?. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, you got an article with several subjects/ideas/opinions trying to make a (several) point(s) while making none (i.e &amp;quot;''the term 'sexual preference' is more broad and includes personal attitudes in between the '''three''' general categories defined as sexual orientations,...''&amp;quot; Three, but the following paragraph now lists five,)...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article seems to be in a dire need of a top to bottom cleanup/revamp =P [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 01:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:...And, why so many redirects for a single article? ¬_¬ [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 01:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I merged 'heterosexual' and 'bisexual' into 'homosexual' since the two articles were one-/two-sentences stubs with little hope of future content. None of the information that was in the original 'homosexual' article has been removed. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 01:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't see what specifically needs to be cleaned-up besides the lead paragraph, which I fiddled with a little bit. What sections need revising? [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 02:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::In very simple terms:&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Lead paragraph''': What Sexual preference is (very brief initial description of a mainstream term/concept.) &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Lesbianism&amp;quot; '''is''' '''homosexuality.''' The addition of &amp;quot;Asexuals&amp;quot; is splitting hairs, and going beyond the furry point of the article (specially if we are making the initial point of only &amp;quot;three&amp;quot; types of &amp;quot;sexual preferences.&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Sexual preferences and furry''' section: An explanation of how does &amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot; related to furry, with the &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; topic the most discussed/best known angle. The initial article (&amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot;) covered the concept, myth and stereotyping of homosexuality in regard to the fandom from this point on, but that point broke when the article moved to cover &amp;quot;sexual preference,&amp;quot; so we get directed immediately to the established gay views of &amp;quot;Non-furries&amp;quot; and fandom, and a lack of studies on &amp;quot;homosexuality&amp;quot; in it, and the general populace. By the end of this article there's still no explanation or correlation between &amp;quot;Sexual preference and furry.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Categorization''' section: All related (exclusively) to the &amp;quot;gay&amp;quot; sexual preference, but nothing to tie it to it's relation to the furry fandom, or &amp;quot;sexual preferences&amp;quot; in general for that matter.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Social attitudes among furries''': Again, solely concentrated around the social and religious attitude of &amp;quot;gay sexuality&amp;quot; within the fandom (the &amp;quot;heterosexual,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;bisexual,&amp;quot; and for that matter, &amp;quot;asexual&amp;quot; sexual preference views have yet to make an appearance, if you noticed.)&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?''' (or '''Homosexuality within the fandom''') section: A good section to follow '''after''' establishing the types of &amp;quot;Sexual preferences&amp;quot; in furry. Move the &amp;quot;non-furry&amp;quot; opinion to it under, maybe, '''A non-furry view of Homosexuality and furry'''.	&lt;br /&gt;
**'''General surveys''' section. Why?. This can easily be integrated inside the '''Fandom surveys''' section (we are still trying to show the furry's angle on this article, no mainstream's.)	&lt;br /&gt;
::::So, as it stands right now, we are not presenting how &amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot; relates to furry fandom accurately right now. Plenty regarding &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; sexual preferences, but that's because that the article was originally about it and furry, before it being renamed. [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 03:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Good points all. The article still needs expansion.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Some thoughts:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The '''Sexual preferences and furry''' section was intially part of the introduction. I don't know how the stuff in the lead section that's about the furry=gay idea got moved into it's own section. If it was a edit done by me, it was a mistake.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I added 'asexual' to the description after finding out that [http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Search?search=asexual at least three popular furries] are 'asexual'. But if it's rare, it shouldn't really be mentioned in the article at all.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I know that '''gay''' means '''homosexual''', but the term '''gay''' is also used a lot to describe all non-straight people-- homosexuals and bisexuals alike.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The '''categorization''' section is 'furry'-relevent since some furries believe that the gay\straight and male/female dictomy is false and think that people can express a variety of attractions throughout their life. The section does need rewording to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''Social attitudes among furries''': Furries are people, and- like people-, some furries are homophobic. This should be mentioned. The section does have a weak title, though. A clearer title would be '''homophobia among furries''', but I didn't use that because I really hate stamping the pejorative political label 'homophobic' on furries who are just exercising their sincerely held religious beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?''': I agree that this belongs right below the introduction. I also think that the '''general surveys''' subsection about non-furries should be seperate from the '''fandom surveys''' subsection since the entire point is to illustrate the contrast.  [[User:24.32.208.58|24.32.208.58]] 07:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Why not have a lot of redirects? The words being re-directed- Sexual orientation, Sexual orientations, Sexual Preferences, homosexuals, homosexuality, gay, gays, et cetera- all fall clearly under this article. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 02:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::'''Gay''', makes sense, '''Homosexual''', yes, '''Homoerotic''', kind of redundant, but...; '''Gays''', uh, that's covered by &amp;quot;Gay,&amp;quot; just enter it on the search box, it will come up; '''Homosexuals''',... all right, getting to &amp;quot;Redundant City&amp;quot; pluralized territory. In other words, we don't need to cover with redirects such a well known, mainstream term. =P [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 03:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The fact that 'homoerotic' redirects here is news to me. That should be changed. The plural redirects are redundant, yes, but I guess I'm used to it from having done it in Wikipedia editing when plurals might generate unhelpful searches. [[User:24.32.208.58|24.32.208.58]] 07:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I edited the lead section so it is now structured more simply and more logically. It mentions the three orientations, then it describes those three orientations, then it describes the term 'gay'- which has three different meanings-, and then it describes the rare exception to all orientations. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 02:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::...Which still presents this article as one about &amp;quot;gay&amp;quot; sexual preferences, not about &amp;quot;sexual preferences&amp;quot; and its relation to furry. This breakdown of the definition of &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; would be more at home on the '''Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?''' (or '''Homosexuality within the fandom''', or simply, '''Homosexuality and furry''') section. [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 03:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''Which still presents this article as one about &amp;quot;gay&amp;quot; sexual preferences'' How so? The intro defines the term 'sexual preference' in detail, then it notes the multiple definitions of 'gay', and then it says what the sexual preferences in the fandom are (or at least it did, until those sentences were moved for some reason).&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''So, as it stands right now, we are not presenting how &amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot; relates to furry fandom accurately right now. Plenty regarding &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; sexual preferences'' In real life, 95% of people are straight. In the fandom, it's between a low of 13% or a high of 53%. The article is gay-centric because, well, most furries are gay. [[User:24.32.208.58|24.32.208.58]] 07:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Regardless, your central point about the sections being jumbled up is definately right. [[User:24.32.208.58|24.32.208.58]] 07:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I moved around the sections. I think that the article flows better now. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 00:05, 4 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Well, no, the plurality are '''bi''' according to the stats. &amp;quot;Most&amp;quot; (the majority) are ''not straight'', but that's different to being gay. :-) --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:19, 4 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Ah, yes, I meant ''not straight''. Anyways, do you think the sections are in proper order or do you think they need to be moved around? [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 03:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Preference or orientation? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should this article be retitled ''Sexual orientation''?  The reason I ask is because certain anti-gay factions prefer the term &amp;quot;sexual preference&amp;quot; over &amp;quot;sexual orientation&amp;quot; because the former carries a stronger implication that being gay or lesbian is a choice. --[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 14:10, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To be honest, it seems like nitpicking to me. I don't think that the term 'sexual preference' implies choice. My [[Wikipedia:Modern liberalism in the United States|very-liberal]] college president recently used the term in a speech before our diversity department. Still, I don't have much of an opinion on it.&lt;br /&gt;
:The reason why I used the title 'sexual preference' for this article since I wanted this article to prominently include the survey that mapped furries on the [[Wikipedia:Kinsey scale|Kinsey scale]], which measures preferences rather than orientations. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 00:21, 4 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Sexual orientation&amp;quot; is by far the more standard term, I believe. I have a copy of ''The Kinsey Institute New Report On Sex'' (Copyright 1990 The Kinsey Institute for  Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction) to hand, and it refers to the Kinsey scale of sexual orientation. -- [[User:Sine|Sine]] 07:13, 4 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Non-furries</id>
		<title>Non-furries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Non-furries"/>
				<updated>2008-01-06T03:28:38Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: Redirecting to Non-furry&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[non-furry]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/User:Boingo</id>
		<title>User:Boingo</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/User:Boingo"/>
				<updated>2008-01-06T01:32:00Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* Name */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''This user is a [[Wikipedia:newbie|newbie]] to the [[furry fandom]]. He might lead to considerable [[Wikipedia:lol|lulz]]. [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:BITE|Be gentle]].''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;This is my private bed &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is where I lie at night &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Staring at a light bulb hanging on the ceiling &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waiting for a dream to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
come and get me out of here&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here in my humble room at night&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I often wonder what goes on out there&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
What makes them run so scared &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I often stare at the people passing by &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But they can't see me through my window shades&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Just like I'm not even there&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I know my problems aren't your fault &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I really want to know &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has it always been this way&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If you can find me&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Come and get me out of here&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- ''[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZJHgZX1yQk&amp;amp;NR=1 Private Life]'' by [[wikipedia:Oingo_Boingo|Oingo Boingo]] (of [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=universalmusicgroup Universal Media Group]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Info==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Status ===&lt;br /&gt;
Hello! Check out my [[LiveJournal]] [http://timmy-boingo.livejournal.com/profile if you want].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm in the process of developing a [[fursona]]. He'll be [[fox|something like]] [[Kendricks]] only darker, scruffier, and not a bit- '''not a bit'''- toony. A significant handicap is my complete lack of [[furry art|any artistic skills]] whatsoever. I would really, really, really like to attend a [[furry convention]]... But... I have a particulary mild [[wikipedia:Agoraphobia|agoraphobia]] that, while merely being annoying in everyday life, will probably be an issue when I am around several hundred people in an enclosed area with no visible exits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first furry materials I read were [[Immelmann]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Concession]]'' and [[Jay Naylor]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Better Days]]''. I consider both of them to be relatively disturbing. In retrospect, I should have anticipated that. I'm currently reading [[Eric W. Schwartz]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Sabrina Online]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm someone of no particular importance (although I did pretty well on the [[Wikipedia:ACT (examination)|ACT]]) who likes [[Wikipedia:wiki|wiki]] editing (don't ask me why). I have no relation whatsoever to [http://purplelemon.homestead.com/files/decatpics.html 'Purple Lemon'], but more power to him (or her). [http://purplelemon.homestead.com/files/destalk.jpg This Elfman pic just kills me].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I first heard about furries from the infamous [[MTV]] 'Sex2K' episode. I didn't think about it much afterward until some [[wikipedia:unencyclopedia|unencyclopedia]] article lead me to look-up [[Pressed Fur]] website. I looked through that and then eventually stumbled onto here. I recently looked over some of the latest [http://www.hartfordadvocate.com/article.cfm?aid=3873 news] [http://www.memphisflyer.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A10121 articles]. So, it's [[wikipedia:Confirmation_bias|only just now sunk in]] that furries are not... [[stereotype|well, you know]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I once tried to set up a [http://en.wikipedia.org/ Wikipedia] account as [[wikipedia:User:Revolutionaryluddite|'Revolutionaryluddite']] only to [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Missing_Wikipedians#R|give up]] a few months afterward. I recieved a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Barnstars|barnstar]] for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&amp;amp;limit=500&amp;amp;target=Revolutionaryluddite my contributions], and I was also threatened with banning a couple times. I still make some sporadic edits now and then-- most of them [[Wikipedia:hard rock|music]] related. The internet's other [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=revolutionaryluddite 'Revolutionaryluddite'] is also me. Make of my eclectic taste in music what you will. [[User:24.32.208.58]] is me as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Name ===&lt;br /&gt;
My [[real life]] name is already being used by a prominent furry ([[User_talk:Boingo|Guess who?]] I'll give you a hint, there's more than one vowel in it). After deciding to create a username based on one of my favorite [[Wikipedia:rock band|bands]], I considered [[wikipedia:Cheap_Trick|Trixie]], [[wikipedia:Ramones|Ramone]], [[wikipedia:Iggy_Pop|Iggy]], [[wikipedia:Thin_Lizzy|Lizzy]], [[wikipedia:Tom_Scholz|Scholz]], [[wikipedia:Def_Leppard|Leppard]], [[wikipedia:Gary_Numan|Numan]], and [[wikipedia:black_crowes|Crowe]]. I picked this because it just sounds/looks good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suppose that this would make a sweet [[fursona]] name-- [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=boingo+furry it still looks open]-- if I could think of a first name to go with it. Maybe 'Timmy' or 'Johnny' or something [[species]]-specific like '[[Kit]]' or '[[Todd]]'? I'm going with 'Timmy'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== About me ===&lt;br /&gt;
When it comes to editing, I like links, single quotes, parenthesis, and citations with multiple links in them (oooh... delicious) and I tend to make a copious amount of spelling and grammar errors (How many can you spot on this page alone?). I wrote a long explanation of my personal beliefs/background/hobbies/whatever on my Wikipedia account for transparency's sake. That was deleted when that account was deleted. Two things that I feel like repeating:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My family is split between [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_American English] [[wikipedia:Fundamentalist_Christianity|Fundamentalist]] [[wikipedia:Lutheran|Lutherans]] (mother's side) and [[wikipedia:Irish_American|Irish]] [[wikipedia:Roman_Catholic_Church|Catholics]] (father's side). Most of them are [[wikipedia:United_States_Democratic_Party|Democrats]]. I self-identify as a [[wikipedia:Evangelicalism|'catholic evangelical']] or [[wikipedia:Evangelical_catholic|'evangelical catholic']].&lt;br /&gt;
*I used to believe in the [[Wikipedia:rapture|rapture]], [[Wikipedia:reparative therapy|reparative therapy]] for [[homosexuals]], and [[Wikipedia:intelligent design|intelligent design]]. I don't anymore, but I'm rather sensitive about it in spite of everything.&lt;br /&gt;
* I used to be a [[wikipedia:Robert_P._Casey|Bob Casey Democrat]] until I jumped ship in fall 2004. I [[wikipedia:Opposition_to_the_2003_Iraq_War#Religious_opposition|strongly opposed the initial invasion of Iraq]], however, I support the [[wikipedia:Iraq_War_troop_surge_of_2007|'surge']] and our continual deployment in the region (See [[wikipedia:Anthony_Zinni|Anthony Zinni]]). Politically, I call myself a [[wikipedia:consistent_life_ethic|'consistent life ethicist']] or a [[wikipedia:One_Nation_Conservative|'one nation conservative']].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's about it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FAQ ===&lt;br /&gt;
'''Revolutionaryluddite'?''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's a reference to the late and great cultural critic [[wikipedia:Neil_Postman|Neil Postman]]. As he has [http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/cyberspace/cyberspace_7-25.html pointed out],&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;If people are getting divorced and mistreating their children and their sexism and racism are blights on our social life, none of that has anything to do with inadequate information. Now, along comes cyberspace and the information superhighway, and everyone seems to have the idea that, ah, here we can do it; if only we can have more access to more information faster and in more diverse forms at long last, we'll be able to solve these problems.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/User:Boingo</id>
		<title>User:Boingo</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/User:Boingo"/>
				<updated>2008-01-06T01:30:58Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* Status */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''This user is a [[Wikipedia:newbie|newbie]] to the [[furry fandom]]. He might lead to considerable [[Wikipedia:lol|lulz]]. [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:BITE|Be gentle]].''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;This is my private bed &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is where I lie at night &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Staring at a light bulb hanging on the ceiling &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waiting for a dream to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
come and get me out of here&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here in my humble room at night&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I often wonder what goes on out there&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
What makes them run so scared &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I often stare at the people passing by &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But they can't see me through my window shades&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Just like I'm not even there&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I know my problems aren't your fault &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I really want to know &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has it always been this way&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If you can find me&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Come and get me out of here&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- ''[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZJHgZX1yQk&amp;amp;NR=1 Private Life]'' by [[wikipedia:Oingo_Boingo|Oingo Boingo]] (of [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=universalmusicgroup Universal Media Group]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Info==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Status ===&lt;br /&gt;
Hello! Check out my [[LiveJournal]] [http://timmy-boingo.livejournal.com/profile if you want].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm in the process of developing a [[fursona]]. He'll be [[fox|something like]] [[Kendricks]] only darker, scruffier, and not a bit- '''not a bit'''- toony. A significant handicap is my complete lack of [[furry art|any artistic skills]] whatsoever. I would really, really, really like to attend a [[furry convention]]... But... I have a particulary mild [[wikipedia:Agoraphobia|agoraphobia]] that, while merely being annoying in everyday life, will probably be an issue when I am around several hundred people in an enclosed area with no visible exits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first furry materials I read were [[Immelmann]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Concession]]'' and [[Jay Naylor]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Better Days]]''. I consider both of them to be relatively disturbing. In retrospect, I should have anticipated that. I'm currently reading [[Eric W. Schwartz]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Sabrina Online]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm someone of no particular importance (although I did pretty well on the [[Wikipedia:ACT (examination)|ACT]]) who likes [[Wikipedia:wiki|wiki]] editing (don't ask me why). I have no relation whatsoever to [http://purplelemon.homestead.com/files/decatpics.html 'Purple Lemon'], but more power to him (or her). [http://purplelemon.homestead.com/files/destalk.jpg This Elfman pic just kills me].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I first heard about furries from the infamous [[MTV]] 'Sex2K' episode. I didn't think about it much afterward until some [[wikipedia:unencyclopedia|unencyclopedia]] article lead me to look-up [[Pressed Fur]] website. I looked through that and then eventually stumbled onto here. I recently looked over some of the latest [http://www.hartfordadvocate.com/article.cfm?aid=3873 news] [http://www.memphisflyer.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A10121 articles]. So, it's [[wikipedia:Confirmation_bias|only just now sunk in]] that furries are not... [[stereotype|well, you know]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I once tried to set up a [http://en.wikipedia.org/ Wikipedia] account as [[wikipedia:User:Revolutionaryluddite|'Revolutionaryluddite']] only to [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Missing_Wikipedians#R|give up]] a few months afterward. I recieved a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Barnstars|barnstar]] for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&amp;amp;limit=500&amp;amp;target=Revolutionaryluddite my contributions], and I was also threatened with banning a couple times. I still make some sporadic edits now and then-- most of them [[Wikipedia:hard rock|music]] related. The internet's other [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=revolutionaryluddite 'Revolutionaryluddite'] is also me. Make of my eclectic taste in music what you will. [[User:24.32.208.58]] is me as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Name ===&lt;br /&gt;
My [[real life]] name is already being used by a prominent furry ([[User_talk:Boingo|Guess who?]] I'll give you a hint, there's more than one vowel in it). After deciding to create a username based on one of my favorite [[Wikipedia:rock band|bands]], I considered [[wikipedia:Cheap_Trick|Trixie]], [[wikipedia:Ramones|Ramone]], [[wikipedia:Iggy_Pop|Iggy]], [[wikipedia:Thin_Lizzy|Lizzy]], [[wikipedia:Tom_Scholz|Scholz]], [[wikipedia:Def_Leppard|Leppard]], [[wikipedia:Gary_Numan|Numan]], and [[wikipedia:black_crowes|Crowe]]. I picked this because it just sounds/looks good. I suppose that this would make a sweet [[fursona]] name-- [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=boingo+furry it still looks open]-- if I could think of a first name to go with it. Maybe 'Timmy' or 'Johnny' or something [[species]]-specific like '[[Kit]]' or '[[Todd]]'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== About me ===&lt;br /&gt;
When it comes to editing, I like links, single quotes, parenthesis, and citations with multiple links in them (oooh... delicious) and I tend to make a copious amount of spelling and grammar errors (How many can you spot on this page alone?). I wrote a long explanation of my personal beliefs/background/hobbies/whatever on my Wikipedia account for transparency's sake. That was deleted when that account was deleted. Two things that I feel like repeating:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My family is split between [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_American English] [[wikipedia:Fundamentalist_Christianity|Fundamentalist]] [[wikipedia:Lutheran|Lutherans]] (mother's side) and [[wikipedia:Irish_American|Irish]] [[wikipedia:Roman_Catholic_Church|Catholics]] (father's side). Most of them are [[wikipedia:United_States_Democratic_Party|Democrats]]. I self-identify as a [[wikipedia:Evangelicalism|'catholic evangelical']] or [[wikipedia:Evangelical_catholic|'evangelical catholic']].&lt;br /&gt;
*I used to believe in the [[Wikipedia:rapture|rapture]], [[Wikipedia:reparative therapy|reparative therapy]] for [[homosexuals]], and [[Wikipedia:intelligent design|intelligent design]]. I don't anymore, but I'm rather sensitive about it in spite of everything.&lt;br /&gt;
* I used to be a [[wikipedia:Robert_P._Casey|Bob Casey Democrat]] until I jumped ship in fall 2004. I [[wikipedia:Opposition_to_the_2003_Iraq_War#Religious_opposition|strongly opposed the initial invasion of Iraq]], however, I support the [[wikipedia:Iraq_War_troop_surge_of_2007|'surge']] and our continual deployment in the region (See [[wikipedia:Anthony_Zinni|Anthony Zinni]]). Politically, I call myself a [[wikipedia:consistent_life_ethic|'consistent life ethicist']] or a [[wikipedia:One_Nation_Conservative|'one nation conservative']].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's about it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FAQ ===&lt;br /&gt;
'''Revolutionaryluddite'?''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's a reference to the late and great cultural critic [[wikipedia:Neil_Postman|Neil Postman]]. As he has [http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/cyberspace/cyberspace_7-25.html pointed out],&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;If people are getting divorced and mistreating their children and their sexism and racism are blights on our social life, none of that has anything to do with inadequate information. Now, along comes cyberspace and the information superhighway, and everyone seems to have the idea that, ah, here we can do it; if only we can have more access to more information faster and in more diverse forms at long last, we'll be able to solve these problems.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/User:Boingo</id>
		<title>User:Boingo</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/User:Boingo"/>
				<updated>2008-01-05T07:37:56Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* Status */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''This user is a [[Wikipedia:newbie|newbie]] to the [[furry fandom]]. He might lead to considerable [[Wikipedia:lol|lulz]]. [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:BITE|Be gentle]].''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;This is my private bed &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is where I lie at night &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Staring at a light bulb hanging on the ceiling &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waiting for a dream to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
come and get me out of here&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here in my humble room at night&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I often wonder what goes on out there&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
What makes them run so scared &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I often stare at the people passing by &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But they can't see me through my window shades&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Just like I'm not even there&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I know my problems aren't your fault &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I really want to know &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has it always been this way&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If you can find me&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Come and get me out of here&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- ''[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZJHgZX1yQk&amp;amp;NR=1 Private Life]'' by [[wikipedia:Oingo_Boingo|Oingo Boingo]] (of [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=universalmusicgroup Universal Media Group]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Info==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Status ===&lt;br /&gt;
Hello! Check out my [[LiveJournal]] [http://timmy-boingo.livejournal.com/profile if you want].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 I'm in the process of developing a [[fursona]]. He'll be [[fox|something like]] [[Kendricks]] only darker, scruffier, and not a bit- '''not a bit'''- toony. A significant handicap is my complete lack of [[furry art|any artistic skills]] whatsoever. I would really, really, really like to attend a [[furry convention]]... But... I have a particulary mild [[wikipedia:Agoraphobia|agoraphobia]] that, while merely being annoying in everyday life, will probably be an issue when I am around several hundred people in an enclosed area with no visible exits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first furry materials I read were [[Immelmann]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Concession]]'' and [[Jay Naylor]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Better Days]]''. I consider both of them to be relatively disturbing. In retrospect, I should have anticipated that. I'm currently reading [[Eric W. Schwartz]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Sabrina Online]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm someone of no particular importance (although I did pretty well on the [[Wikipedia:ACT (examination)|ACT]]) who likes [[Wikipedia:wiki|wiki]] editing (don't ask me why). I have no relation whatsoever to [http://purplelemon.homestead.com/files/decatpics.html 'Purple Lemon'], but more power to him (or her). [http://purplelemon.homestead.com/files/destalk.jpg This Elfman pic just kills me].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I first heard about furries from the infamous [[MTV]] 'Sex2K' episode. I didn't think about it much afterward until some [[wikipedia:unencyclopedia|unencyclopedia]] article lead me to look-up [[Pressed Fur]] website. I looked through that and then eventually stumbled onto here. I recently looked over some of the latest [http://www.hartfordadvocate.com/article.cfm?aid=3873 news] [http://www.memphisflyer.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A10121 articles]. So, it's [[wikipedia:Confirmation_bias|only just now sunk in]] that furries are not... [[stereotype|well, you know]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I once tried to set up a [http://en.wikipedia.org/ Wikipedia] account as [[wikipedia:User:Revolutionaryluddite|'Revolutionaryluddite']] only to [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Missing_Wikipedians#R|give up]] a few months afterward. I recieved a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Barnstars|barnstar]] for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&amp;amp;limit=500&amp;amp;target=Revolutionaryluddite my contributions], and I was also threatened with banning a couple times. I still make some sporadic edits now and then-- most of them [[Wikipedia:hard rock|music]] related. The internet's other [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=revolutionaryluddite 'Revolutionaryluddite'] is also me. Make of my eclectic taste in music what you will. [[User:24.32.208.58]] is me as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Name ===&lt;br /&gt;
My [[real life]] name is already being used by a prominent furry ([[User_talk:Boingo|Guess who?]] I'll give you a hint, there's more than one vowel in it). After deciding to create a username based on one of my favorite [[Wikipedia:rock band|bands]], I considered [[wikipedia:Cheap_Trick|Trixie]], [[wikipedia:Ramones|Ramone]], [[wikipedia:Iggy_Pop|Iggy]], [[wikipedia:Thin_Lizzy|Lizzy]], [[wikipedia:Tom_Scholz|Scholz]], [[wikipedia:Def_Leppard|Leppard]], [[wikipedia:Gary_Numan|Numan]], and [[wikipedia:black_crowes|Crowe]]. I picked this because it just sounds/looks good. I suppose that this would make a sweet [[fursona]] name-- [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=boingo+furry it still looks open]-- if I could think of a first name to go with it. Maybe 'Timmy' or 'Johnny' or something [[species]]-specific like '[[Kit]]' or '[[Todd]]'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== About me ===&lt;br /&gt;
When it comes to editing, I like links, single quotes, parenthesis, and citations with multiple links in them (oooh... delicious) and I tend to make a copious amount of spelling and grammar errors (How many can you spot on this page alone?). I wrote a long explanation of my personal beliefs/background/hobbies/whatever on my Wikipedia account for transparency's sake. That was deleted when that account was deleted. Two things that I feel like repeating:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My family is split between [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_American English] [[wikipedia:Fundamentalist_Christianity|Fundamentalist]] [[wikipedia:Lutheran|Lutherans]] (mother's side) and [[wikipedia:Irish_American|Irish]] [[wikipedia:Roman_Catholic_Church|Catholics]] (father's side). Most of them are [[wikipedia:United_States_Democratic_Party|Democrats]]. I self-identify as a [[wikipedia:Evangelicalism|'catholic evangelical']] or [[wikipedia:Evangelical_catholic|'evangelical catholic']].&lt;br /&gt;
*I used to believe in the [[Wikipedia:rapture|rapture]], [[Wikipedia:reparative therapy|reparative therapy]] for [[homosexuals]], and [[Wikipedia:intelligent design|intelligent design]]. I don't anymore, but I'm rather sensitive about it in spite of everything.&lt;br /&gt;
* I used to be a [[wikipedia:Robert_P._Casey|Bob Casey Democrat]] until I jumped ship in fall 2004. I [[wikipedia:Opposition_to_the_2003_Iraq_War#Religious_opposition|strongly opposed the initial invasion of Iraq]], however, I support the [[wikipedia:Iraq_War_troop_surge_of_2007|'surge']] and our continual deployment in the region (See [[wikipedia:Anthony_Zinni|Anthony Zinni]]). Politically, I call myself a [[wikipedia:consistent_life_ethic|'consistent life ethicist']] or a [[wikipedia:One_Nation_Conservative|'one nation conservative']].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's about it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FAQ ===&lt;br /&gt;
'''Revolutionaryluddite'?''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's a reference to the late and great cultural critic [[wikipedia:Neil_Postman|Neil Postman]]. As he has [http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/cyberspace/cyberspace_7-25.html pointed out],&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;If people are getting divorced and mistreating their children and their sexism and racism are blights on our social life, none of that has anything to do with inadequate information. Now, along comes cyberspace and the information superhighway, and everyone seems to have the idea that, ah, here we can do it; if only we can have more access to more information faster and in more diverse forms at long last, we'll be able to solve these problems.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/User:Boingo</id>
		<title>User:Boingo</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/User:Boingo"/>
				<updated>2008-01-04T00:32:55Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* Status */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''This user is a [[Wikipedia:newbie|newbie]] to the [[furry fandom]]. He might lead to considerable [[Wikipedia:lol|lulz]]. [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:BITE|Be gentle]].''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;This is my private bed &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is where I lie at night &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Staring at a light bulb hanging on the ceiling &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waiting for a dream to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
come and get me out of here&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here in my humble room at night&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I often wonder what goes on out there&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
What makes them run so scared &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I often stare at the people passing by &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But they can't see me through my window shades&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Just like I'm not even there&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I know my problems aren't your fault &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I really want to know &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has it always been this way&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If you can find me&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Come and get me out of here&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- ''[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZJHgZX1yQk&amp;amp;NR=1 Private Life]'' by [[wikipedia:Oingo_Boingo|Oingo Boingo]] (of [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=universalmusicgroup Universal Media Group]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Info==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Status ===&lt;br /&gt;
I'm in the process of developing a [[fursona]]. He'll be [[fox|something like]] [[Kendricks]] only darker, scruffier, and not a bit- '''not a bit'''- toony. A significant handicap is my complete lack of [[furry art|any artistic skills]] whatsoever. I don't have a [[LiveJournal]], but I'm considering getting one. I would really, really, really like to attend a [[furry convention]]... But... I have a particulary mild [[wikipedia:Agoraphobia|agoraphobia]] that, while merely being annoying in everyday life, will probably be an issue when I am around several hundred people in an enclosed area with no visible exits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first furry materials I read were [[Immelmann]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Concession]]'' and [[Jay Naylor]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Better Days]]''. I consider both of them to be relatively disturbing. In retrospect, I should have anticipated that. I'm currently reading [[Eric W. Schwartz]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Sabrina Online]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm someone of no particular importance (although I did pretty well on the [[Wikipedia:ACT (examination)|ACT]]) who likes [[Wikipedia:wiki|wiki]] editing (don't ask me why). I have no relation whatsoever to [http://purplelemon.homestead.com/files/decatpics.html 'Purple Lemon'], but more power to him (or her). [http://purplelemon.homestead.com/files/destalk.jpg This Elfman pic just kills me].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I first heard about furries from the infamous [[MTV]] 'Sex2K' episode. I didn't think about it much afterward until some [[wikipedia:unencyclopedia|unencyclopedia]] article lead me to look-up [[Pressed Fur]] website. I looked through that and then eventually stumbled onto here. I recently looked over some of the latest [http://www.hartfordadvocate.com/article.cfm?aid=3873 news] [http://www.memphisflyer.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A10121 articles]. So, it's [[wikipedia:Confirmation_bias|only just now sunk in]] that furries are not... [[stereotype|well, you know]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I once tried to set up a [http://en.wikipedia.org/ Wikipedia] account as [[wikipedia:User:Revolutionaryluddite|'Revolutionaryluddite']] only to [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Missing_Wikipedians#R|give up]] a few months afterward. I recieved a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Barnstars|barnstar]] for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&amp;amp;limit=500&amp;amp;target=Revolutionaryluddite my contributions], and I was also threatened with banning a couple times. I still make some sporadic edits now and then-- most of them [[Wikipedia:hard rock|music]] related. The internet's other [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=revolutionaryluddite 'Revolutionaryluddite'] is also me. Make of my eclectic taste in music what you will. [[User:24.32.208.58]] is me as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Name ===&lt;br /&gt;
My [[real life]] name is already being used by a prominent furry ([[User_talk:Boingo|Guess who?]] I'll give you a hint, there's more than one vowel in it). After deciding to create a username based on one of my favorite [[Wikipedia:rock band|bands]], I considered [[wikipedia:Cheap_Trick|Trixie]], [[wikipedia:Ramones|Ramone]], [[wikipedia:Iggy_Pop|Iggy]], [[wikipedia:Thin_Lizzy|Lizzy]], [[wikipedia:Tom_Scholz|Scholz]], [[wikipedia:Def_Leppard|Leppard]], [[wikipedia:Gary_Numan|Numan]], and [[wikipedia:black_crowes|Crowe]]. I picked this because it just sounds/looks good. I suppose that this would make a sweet [[fursona]] name-- [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=boingo+furry it still looks open]-- if I could think of a first name to go with it. Maybe 'Timmy' or 'Johnny' or something [[species]]-specific like '[[Kit]]' or '[[Todd]]'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== About me ===&lt;br /&gt;
When it comes to editing, I like links, single quotes, parenthesis, and citations with multiple links in them (oooh... delicious) and I tend to make a copious amount of spelling and grammar errors (How many can you spot on this page alone?). I wrote a long explanation of my personal beliefs/background/hobbies/whatever on my Wikipedia account for transparency's sake. That was deleted when that account was deleted. Two things that I feel like repeating:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My family is split between [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_American English] [[wikipedia:Fundamentalist_Christianity|Fundamentalist]] [[wikipedia:Lutheran|Lutherans]] (mother's side) and [[wikipedia:Irish_American|Irish]] [[wikipedia:Roman_Catholic_Church|Catholics]] (father's side). Most of them are [[wikipedia:United_States_Democratic_Party|Democrats]]. I self-identify as a [[wikipedia:Evangelicalism|'catholic evangelical']] or [[wikipedia:Evangelical_catholic|'evangelical catholic']].&lt;br /&gt;
*I used to believe in the [[Wikipedia:rapture|rapture]], [[Wikipedia:reparative therapy|reparative therapy]] for [[homosexuals]], and [[Wikipedia:intelligent design|intelligent design]]. I don't anymore, but I'm rather sensitive about it in spite of everything.&lt;br /&gt;
* I used to be a [[wikipedia:Robert_P._Casey|Bob Casey Democrat]] until I jumped ship in fall 2004. I [[wikipedia:Opposition_to_the_2003_Iraq_War#Religious_opposition|strongly opposed the initial invasion of Iraq]], however, I support the [[wikipedia:Iraq_War_troop_surge_of_2007|'surge']] and our continual deployment in the region (See [[wikipedia:Anthony_Zinni|Anthony Zinni]]). Politically, I call myself a [[wikipedia:consistent_life_ethic|'consistent life ethicist']] or a [[wikipedia:One_Nation_Conservative|'one nation conservative']].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's about it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FAQ ===&lt;br /&gt;
'''Revolutionaryluddite'?''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's a reference to the late and great cultural critic [[wikipedia:Neil_Postman|Neil Postman]]. As he has [http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/cyberspace/cyberspace_7-25.html pointed out],&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;If people are getting divorced and mistreating their children and their sexism and racism are blights on our social life, none of that has anything to do with inadequate information. Now, along comes cyberspace and the information superhighway, and everyone seems to have the idea that, ah, here we can do it; if only we can have more access to more information faster and in more diverse forms at long last, we'll be able to solve these problems.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Sexual_orientation</id>
		<title>Talk:Sexual orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Sexual_orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-04T00:21:51Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* Preference or orientation? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Sorry, that last edit was me.  --Brody&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Incorrect data==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just added all of the percentages together on the Kinsey scale chart because I was thinking about making a cumulative frequency table for it or something, but I found that the percentages only add up to 97% when they should add up to 100%, so could we correct this please? Thanks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
| Kinsey rank&lt;br /&gt;
| Percentage&lt;br /&gt;
| Cumulative freq.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| 12&lt;br /&gt;
| 12&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| 18&lt;br /&gt;
| 30&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| 18&lt;br /&gt;
| 48&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| 14&lt;br /&gt;
| 62&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4&lt;br /&gt;
| 11&lt;br /&gt;
| 73&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5&lt;br /&gt;
| 16&lt;br /&gt;
| 89&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6&lt;br /&gt;
| 8&lt;br /&gt;
| 97&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Total:&lt;br /&gt;
| 97%&lt;br /&gt;
| 97%&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Shia|Shia]] 17:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's just because they've been rounded down (like 12.9 -&amp;gt; 12). I'll add in the decimal points. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:04, 29 May 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FAOD Poll ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is a web-poll with 44 responses statistically solid?  Granted it's always difficult to get well-sampled and unbiased results about highly personal topics, but with fewer than a hundred or so responses and the fact that polls within a community tend to be unavoidably self-selecting there's so much potential bias in either direction that they could arguably be considered anecdotal. --[[User:Riismo|Riismo]] 22:21, 5 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some observations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are a few observations and speculations I've made regarding homosexuality in furry fandom.  Feel free to mull over these and offer any suggestions on whether you think they're accurate or not, and if so, whether they should be incorporated into the article (I am using the term &amp;quot;gays&amp;quot; throughout to represent both genders):&lt;br /&gt;
*The polls quoted here, and at least one other I'm aware of, suggest that the proportion of gays in furry fandom is approximately three times the proportion of gays in the general population;&lt;br /&gt;
*If that figure seems low, I can think of a few reasons why it might seem to be much higher:&lt;br /&gt;
**Gays are much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow furry fans than they are in other areas of their life, such as school and the workplace.  Statistically it may be true that 5-10% of the people at my workplace are gay, but I seldom find out who they are.  The proportion of gays among furries may only be 3x what it is in my workplace, but the proportion of gays ''that I know about'' is far greater;&lt;br /&gt;
**Having a non-furry S.O. and having children (whether natural, adopted, or foster) are two factors that often result in a fan having less time and money to devote to things furry, and having to limit one's involvement due to other priorities.  Gays are more likely than straight folk to have an S.O. who is also a furry fan, and are less likely than straight folk to be raising children  (Granted, every individual's situation is different, but averaged over a large number of people I would be surprised if this is not the case);&lt;br /&gt;
*Gays already have to deal with the idea that one major area of their lives goes against what is considered normal by a large segment of society.  As such, the idea of having an interest that some would consider unusual or weird is not as big a leap as it is for someone who hasn't been down that road;&lt;br /&gt;
*How much greater is the awareness of the existence of furry fandom among gays compared to straights?  I honestly don't know, but if more people among any demographic (such as gays) knows of the existence of furry fandom, it follows that more people from among that group would become furry fans.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 20:05, 10 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some thoughts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Wouldn't it be nice if the table had each row color-coded? With the top one a certain solid color, the bottom one another solid color, and the middle row a blend of the two? I suggest a red-blue or a yellow-blue pattern.* I have no idea how to do this, but the syntax might be on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Table#Examples this wiki help page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Dr.Kinsey's ''Sexual Behavior in the Human Male'' found that &amp;quot;46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or &amp;quot;reacted to&amp;quot; persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives&amp;quot;. In addition, &amp;quot;Kinsey said in both the Male and Female volumes that it was impossible to determine the number of persons who are &amp;quot;homosexual&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;heterosexual&amp;quot;. It was only possible to determine behavior at any given time&amp;quot;- &amp;quot;10% of males in the sample were predominantly homosexual between the ages of 16 and 55&amp;quot;. See [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Am I arguing that furry fandom is represenative of the general population? No. However, I think that the article really needs some necessary context. In the world [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAH_mjLhreE that most people live in], someone with the genetic background/social background of a 1/2, 1, 2, or a 2 1/2- et cetera- would probably self-identify as 'straight' throughout their life. The same might not be true for furries.** &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; One could argue that the color red signifies 'bad' or the color yellow signifies 'sickly'. I don't know. It's just a suggestion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;**&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; I say &amp;quot;might&amp;quot; because, well, how would [[mundane|I]] know?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 05:13, 26 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gay-&amp;gt;Sexual preference? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This use to be the [[Gay]] article (?.) Why try to overwrite the original entry with another subject instead of starting a new one (&amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot;,) and migrate the pertinent (&amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot;) data to it?. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, you got an article with several subjects/ideas/opinions trying to make a (several) point(s) while making none (i.e &amp;quot;''the term 'sexual preference' is more broad and includes personal attitudes in between the '''three''' general categories defined as sexual orientations,...''&amp;quot; Three, but the following paragraph now lists five,)...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article seems to be in a dire need of a top to bottom cleanup/revamp =P [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 01:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:...And, why so many redirects for a single article? ¬_¬ [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 01:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I merged 'heterosexual' and 'bisexual' into 'homosexual' since the two articles were one-/two-sentences stubs with little hope of future content. None of the information that was in the original 'homosexual' article has been removed. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 01:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't see what specifically needs to be cleaned-up besides the lead paragraph, which I fiddled with a little bit. What sections need revising? [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 02:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::In very simple terms:&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Lead paragraph''': What Sexual preference is (very brief initial description of a mainstream term/concept.) &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Lesbianism&amp;quot; '''is''' '''homosexuality.''' The addition of &amp;quot;Asexuals&amp;quot; is splitting hairs, and going beyond the furry point of the article (specially if we are making the initial point of only &amp;quot;three&amp;quot; types of &amp;quot;sexual preferences.&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Sexual preferences and furry''' section: An explanation of how does &amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot; related to furry, with the &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; topic the most discussed/best known angle. The initial article (&amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot;) covered the concept, myth and stereotyping of homosexuality in regard to the fandom from this point on, but that point broke when the article moved to cover &amp;quot;sexual preference,&amp;quot; so we get directed immediately to the established gay views of &amp;quot;Non-furries&amp;quot; and fandom, and a lack of studies on &amp;quot;homosexuality&amp;quot; in it, and the general populace. By the end of this article there's still no explanation or correlation between &amp;quot;Sexual preference and furry.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Categorization''' section: All related (exclusively) to the &amp;quot;gay&amp;quot; sexual preference, but nothing to tie it to it's relation to the furry fandom, or &amp;quot;sexual preferences&amp;quot; in general for that matter.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Social attitudes among furries''': Again, solely concentrated around the social and religious attitude of &amp;quot;gay sexuality&amp;quot; within the fandom (the &amp;quot;heterosexual,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;bisexual,&amp;quot; and for that matter, &amp;quot;asexual&amp;quot; sexual preference views have yet to make an appearance, if you noticed.)&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?''' (or '''Homosexuality within the fandom''') section: A good section to follow '''after''' establishing the types of &amp;quot;Sexual preferences&amp;quot; in furry. Move the &amp;quot;non-furry&amp;quot; opinion to it under, maybe, '''A non-furry view of Homosexuality and furry'''.	&lt;br /&gt;
**'''General surveys''' section. Why?. This can easily be integrated inside the '''Fandom surveys''' section (we are still trying to show the furry's angle on this article, no mainstream's.)	&lt;br /&gt;
::::So, as it stands right now, we are not presenting how &amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot; relates to furry fandom accurately right now. Plenty regarding &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; sexual preferences, but that's because that the article was originally about it and furry, before it being renamed. [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 03:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Good points all. The article still needs expansion.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Some thoughts:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The '''Sexual preferences and furry''' section was intially part of the introduction. I don't know how the stuff in the lead section that's about the furry=gay idea got moved into it's own section. If it was a edit done by me, it was a mistake.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I added 'asexual' to the description after finding out that [http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Search?search=asexual at least three popular furries] are 'asexual'. But if it's rare, it shouldn't really be mentioned in the article at all.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I know that '''gay''' means '''homosexual''', but the term '''gay''' is also used a lot to describe all non-straight people-- homosexuals and bisexuals alike.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The '''categorization''' section is 'furry'-relevent since some furries believe that the gay\straight and male/female dictomy is false and think that people can express a variety of attractions throughout their life. The section does need rewording to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''Social attitudes among furries''': Furries are people, and- like people-, some furries are homophobic. This should be mentioned. The section does have a weak title, though. A clearer title would be '''homophobia among furries''', but I didn't use that because I really hate stamping the pejorative political label 'homophobic' on furries who are just exercising their sincerely held religious beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?''': I agree that this belongs right below the introduction. I also think that the '''general surveys''' subsection about non-furries should be seperate from the '''fandom surveys''' subsection since the entire point is to illustrate the contrast.  [[User:24.32.208.58|24.32.208.58]] 07:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Why not have a lot of redirects? The words being re-directed- Sexual orientation, Sexual orientations, Sexual Preferences, homosexuals, homosexuality, gay, gays, et cetera- all fall clearly under this article. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 02:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::'''Gay''', makes sense, '''Homosexual''', yes, '''Homoerotic''', kind of redundant, but...; '''Gays''', uh, that's covered by &amp;quot;Gay,&amp;quot; just enter it on the search box, it will come up; '''Homosexuals''',... all right, getting to &amp;quot;Redundant City&amp;quot; pluralized territory. In other words, we don't need to cover with redirects such a well known, mainstream term. =P [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 03:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The fact that 'homoerotic' redirects here is news to me. That should be changed. The plural redirects are redundant, yes, but I guess I'm used to it from having done it in Wikipedia editing when plurals might generate unhelpful searches. [[User:24.32.208.58|24.32.208.58]] 07:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I edited the lead section so it is now structured more simply and more logically. It mentions the three orientations, then it describes those three orientations, then it describes the term 'gay'- which has three different meanings-, and then it describes the rare exception to all orientations. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 02:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::...Which still presents this article as one about &amp;quot;gay&amp;quot; sexual preferences, not about &amp;quot;sexual preferences&amp;quot; and its relation to furry. This breakdown of the definition of &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; would be more at home on the '''Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?''' (or '''Homosexuality within the fandom''', or simply, '''Homosexuality and furry''') section. [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 03:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''Which still presents this article as one about &amp;quot;gay&amp;quot; sexual preferences'' How so? The intro defines the term 'sexual preference' in detail, then it notes the multiple definitions of 'gay', and then it says what the sexual preferences in the fandom are (or at least it did, until those sentences were moved for some reason).&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''So, as it stands right now, we are not presenting how &amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot; relates to furry fandom accurately right now. Plenty regarding &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; sexual preferences'' In real life, 95% of people are straight. In the fandom, it's between a low of 13% or a high of 53%. The article is gay-centric because, well, most furries are gay. [[User:24.32.208.58|24.32.208.58]] 07:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Regardless, your central point about the sections being jumbled up is definately right. [[User:24.32.208.58|24.32.208.58]] 07:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I moved around the sections. I think that the article flows better now. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 00:05, 4 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Preference or orientation? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should this article be retitled ''Sexual orientation''?  The reason I ask is because certain anti-gay factions prefer the term &amp;quot;sexual preference&amp;quot; over &amp;quot;sexual orientation&amp;quot; because the former carries a stronger implication that being gay or lesbian is a choice. --[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 14:10, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To be honest, it seems like nitpicking to me. I don't think that the term 'sexual preference' implies choice. My [[Wikipedia:Modern liberalism in the United States|very-liberal]] college president recently used the term in a speech before our diversity department. Still, I don't have much of an opinion on it.&lt;br /&gt;
:The reason why I used the title 'sexual preference' for this article since I wanted this article to prominently include the survey that mapped furries on the [[Wikipedia:Kinsey scale|Kinsey scale]], which measures preferences rather than orientations. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 00:21, 4 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Sexual_orientation</id>
		<title>Talk:Sexual orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Sexual_orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-04T00:21:24Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* Preference or orientation? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Sorry, that last edit was me.  --Brody&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Incorrect data==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just added all of the percentages together on the Kinsey scale chart because I was thinking about making a cumulative frequency table for it or something, but I found that the percentages only add up to 97% when they should add up to 100%, so could we correct this please? Thanks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
| Kinsey rank&lt;br /&gt;
| Percentage&lt;br /&gt;
| Cumulative freq.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| 12&lt;br /&gt;
| 12&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| 18&lt;br /&gt;
| 30&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| 18&lt;br /&gt;
| 48&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| 14&lt;br /&gt;
| 62&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4&lt;br /&gt;
| 11&lt;br /&gt;
| 73&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5&lt;br /&gt;
| 16&lt;br /&gt;
| 89&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6&lt;br /&gt;
| 8&lt;br /&gt;
| 97&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Total:&lt;br /&gt;
| 97%&lt;br /&gt;
| 97%&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Shia|Shia]] 17:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's just because they've been rounded down (like 12.9 -&amp;gt; 12). I'll add in the decimal points. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:04, 29 May 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FAOD Poll ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is a web-poll with 44 responses statistically solid?  Granted it's always difficult to get well-sampled and unbiased results about highly personal topics, but with fewer than a hundred or so responses and the fact that polls within a community tend to be unavoidably self-selecting there's so much potential bias in either direction that they could arguably be considered anecdotal. --[[User:Riismo|Riismo]] 22:21, 5 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some observations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are a few observations and speculations I've made regarding homosexuality in furry fandom.  Feel free to mull over these and offer any suggestions on whether you think they're accurate or not, and if so, whether they should be incorporated into the article (I am using the term &amp;quot;gays&amp;quot; throughout to represent both genders):&lt;br /&gt;
*The polls quoted here, and at least one other I'm aware of, suggest that the proportion of gays in furry fandom is approximately three times the proportion of gays in the general population;&lt;br /&gt;
*If that figure seems low, I can think of a few reasons why it might seem to be much higher:&lt;br /&gt;
**Gays are much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow furry fans than they are in other areas of their life, such as school and the workplace.  Statistically it may be true that 5-10% of the people at my workplace are gay, but I seldom find out who they are.  The proportion of gays among furries may only be 3x what it is in my workplace, but the proportion of gays ''that I know about'' is far greater;&lt;br /&gt;
**Having a non-furry S.O. and having children (whether natural, adopted, or foster) are two factors that often result in a fan having less time and money to devote to things furry, and having to limit one's involvement due to other priorities.  Gays are more likely than straight folk to have an S.O. who is also a furry fan, and are less likely than straight folk to be raising children  (Granted, every individual's situation is different, but averaged over a large number of people I would be surprised if this is not the case);&lt;br /&gt;
*Gays already have to deal with the idea that one major area of their lives goes against what is considered normal by a large segment of society.  As such, the idea of having an interest that some would consider unusual or weird is not as big a leap as it is for someone who hasn't been down that road;&lt;br /&gt;
*How much greater is the awareness of the existence of furry fandom among gays compared to straights?  I honestly don't know, but if more people among any demographic (such as gays) knows of the existence of furry fandom, it follows that more people from among that group would become furry fans.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 20:05, 10 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some thoughts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Wouldn't it be nice if the table had each row color-coded? With the top one a certain solid color, the bottom one another solid color, and the middle row a blend of the two? I suggest a red-blue or a yellow-blue pattern.* I have no idea how to do this, but the syntax might be on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Table#Examples this wiki help page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Dr.Kinsey's ''Sexual Behavior in the Human Male'' found that &amp;quot;46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or &amp;quot;reacted to&amp;quot; persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives&amp;quot;. In addition, &amp;quot;Kinsey said in both the Male and Female volumes that it was impossible to determine the number of persons who are &amp;quot;homosexual&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;heterosexual&amp;quot;. It was only possible to determine behavior at any given time&amp;quot;- &amp;quot;10% of males in the sample were predominantly homosexual between the ages of 16 and 55&amp;quot;. See [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Am I arguing that furry fandom is represenative of the general population? No. However, I think that the article really needs some necessary context. In the world [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAH_mjLhreE that most people live in], someone with the genetic background/social background of a 1/2, 1, 2, or a 2 1/2- et cetera- would probably self-identify as 'straight' throughout their life. The same might not be true for furries.** &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; One could argue that the color red signifies 'bad' or the color yellow signifies 'sickly'. I don't know. It's just a suggestion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;**&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; I say &amp;quot;might&amp;quot; because, well, how would [[mundane|I]] know?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 05:13, 26 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gay-&amp;gt;Sexual preference? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This use to be the [[Gay]] article (?.) Why try to overwrite the original entry with another subject instead of starting a new one (&amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot;,) and migrate the pertinent (&amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot;) data to it?. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, you got an article with several subjects/ideas/opinions trying to make a (several) point(s) while making none (i.e &amp;quot;''the term 'sexual preference' is more broad and includes personal attitudes in between the '''three''' general categories defined as sexual orientations,...''&amp;quot; Three, but the following paragraph now lists five,)...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article seems to be in a dire need of a top to bottom cleanup/revamp =P [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 01:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:...And, why so many redirects for a single article? ¬_¬ [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 01:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I merged 'heterosexual' and 'bisexual' into 'homosexual' since the two articles were one-/two-sentences stubs with little hope of future content. None of the information that was in the original 'homosexual' article has been removed. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 01:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't see what specifically needs to be cleaned-up besides the lead paragraph, which I fiddled with a little bit. What sections need revising? [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 02:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::In very simple terms:&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Lead paragraph''': What Sexual preference is (very brief initial description of a mainstream term/concept.) &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Lesbianism&amp;quot; '''is''' '''homosexuality.''' The addition of &amp;quot;Asexuals&amp;quot; is splitting hairs, and going beyond the furry point of the article (specially if we are making the initial point of only &amp;quot;three&amp;quot; types of &amp;quot;sexual preferences.&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Sexual preferences and furry''' section: An explanation of how does &amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot; related to furry, with the &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; topic the most discussed/best known angle. The initial article (&amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot;) covered the concept, myth and stereotyping of homosexuality in regard to the fandom from this point on, but that point broke when the article moved to cover &amp;quot;sexual preference,&amp;quot; so we get directed immediately to the established gay views of &amp;quot;Non-furries&amp;quot; and fandom, and a lack of studies on &amp;quot;homosexuality&amp;quot; in it, and the general populace. By the end of this article there's still no explanation or correlation between &amp;quot;Sexual preference and furry.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Categorization''' section: All related (exclusively) to the &amp;quot;gay&amp;quot; sexual preference, but nothing to tie it to it's relation to the furry fandom, or &amp;quot;sexual preferences&amp;quot; in general for that matter.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Social attitudes among furries''': Again, solely concentrated around the social and religious attitude of &amp;quot;gay sexuality&amp;quot; within the fandom (the &amp;quot;heterosexual,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;bisexual,&amp;quot; and for that matter, &amp;quot;asexual&amp;quot; sexual preference views have yet to make an appearance, if you noticed.)&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?''' (or '''Homosexuality within the fandom''') section: A good section to follow '''after''' establishing the types of &amp;quot;Sexual preferences&amp;quot; in furry. Move the &amp;quot;non-furry&amp;quot; opinion to it under, maybe, '''A non-furry view of Homosexuality and furry'''.	&lt;br /&gt;
**'''General surveys''' section. Why?. This can easily be integrated inside the '''Fandom surveys''' section (we are still trying to show the furry's angle on this article, no mainstream's.)	&lt;br /&gt;
::::So, as it stands right now, we are not presenting how &amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot; relates to furry fandom accurately right now. Plenty regarding &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; sexual preferences, but that's because that the article was originally about it and furry, before it being renamed. [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 03:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Good points all. The article still needs expansion.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Some thoughts:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The '''Sexual preferences and furry''' section was intially part of the introduction. I don't know how the stuff in the lead section that's about the furry=gay idea got moved into it's own section. If it was a edit done by me, it was a mistake.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I added 'asexual' to the description after finding out that [http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Search?search=asexual at least three popular furries] are 'asexual'. But if it's rare, it shouldn't really be mentioned in the article at all.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I know that '''gay''' means '''homosexual''', but the term '''gay''' is also used a lot to describe all non-straight people-- homosexuals and bisexuals alike.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The '''categorization''' section is 'furry'-relevent since some furries believe that the gay\straight and male/female dictomy is false and think that people can express a variety of attractions throughout their life. The section does need rewording to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''Social attitudes among furries''': Furries are people, and- like people-, some furries are homophobic. This should be mentioned. The section does have a weak title, though. A clearer title would be '''homophobia among furries''', but I didn't use that because I really hate stamping the pejorative political label 'homophobic' on furries who are just exercising their sincerely held religious beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?''': I agree that this belongs right below the introduction. I also think that the '''general surveys''' subsection about non-furries should be seperate from the '''fandom surveys''' subsection since the entire point is to illustrate the contrast.  [[User:24.32.208.58|24.32.208.58]] 07:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Why not have a lot of redirects? The words being re-directed- Sexual orientation, Sexual orientations, Sexual Preferences, homosexuals, homosexuality, gay, gays, et cetera- all fall clearly under this article. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 02:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::'''Gay''', makes sense, '''Homosexual''', yes, '''Homoerotic''', kind of redundant, but...; '''Gays''', uh, that's covered by &amp;quot;Gay,&amp;quot; just enter it on the search box, it will come up; '''Homosexuals''',... all right, getting to &amp;quot;Redundant City&amp;quot; pluralized territory. In other words, we don't need to cover with redirects such a well known, mainstream term. =P [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 03:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The fact that 'homoerotic' redirects here is news to me. That should be changed. The plural redirects are redundant, yes, but I guess I'm used to it from having done it in Wikipedia editing when plurals might generate unhelpful searches. [[User:24.32.208.58|24.32.208.58]] 07:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I edited the lead section so it is now structured more simply and more logically. It mentions the three orientations, then it describes those three orientations, then it describes the term 'gay'- which has three different meanings-, and then it describes the rare exception to all orientations. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 02:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::...Which still presents this article as one about &amp;quot;gay&amp;quot; sexual preferences, not about &amp;quot;sexual preferences&amp;quot; and its relation to furry. This breakdown of the definition of &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; would be more at home on the '''Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?''' (or '''Homosexuality within the fandom''', or simply, '''Homosexuality and furry''') section. [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 03:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''Which still presents this article as one about &amp;quot;gay&amp;quot; sexual preferences'' How so? The intro defines the term 'sexual preference' in detail, then it notes the multiple definitions of 'gay', and then it says what the sexual preferences in the fandom are (or at least it did, until those sentences were moved for some reason).&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''So, as it stands right now, we are not presenting how &amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot; relates to furry fandom accurately right now. Plenty regarding &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; sexual preferences'' In real life, 95% of people are straight. In the fandom, it's between a low of 13% or a high of 53%. The article is gay-centric because, well, most furries are gay. [[User:24.32.208.58|24.32.208.58]] 07:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Regardless, your central point about the sections being jumbled up is definately right. [[User:24.32.208.58|24.32.208.58]] 07:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I moved around the sections. I think that the article flows better now. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 00:05, 4 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Preference or orientation? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should this article be retitled ''Sexual orientation''?  The reason I ask is because certain anti-gay factions prefer the term &amp;quot;sexual preference&amp;quot; over &amp;quot;sexual orientation&amp;quot; because the former carries a stronger implication that being gay or lesbian is a choice. --[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 14:10, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To be honest, it seems like nitpicking to me. I don't think that the term 'sexual preference' implies choice. My [[Wikipedia:Modern liberalism in the United States|very-liberal]] college president recently used the term in a speech before our diversity department. Still, I don't have much of an opinion on it.&lt;br /&gt;
:The reason why I used the title 'sexual preference' for this article since I wanted this article to prominently include the survey that mapped furries on the [[Wikipedia:Kinsey scale|Kinsey scale]], which measures preferences rather than orientation. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 00:21, 4 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Sexual_orientation</id>
		<title>Talk:Sexual orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Sexual_orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-04T00:05:01Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* Gay-&amp;gt;Sexual preference? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Sorry, that last edit was me.  --Brody&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Incorrect data==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just added all of the percentages together on the Kinsey scale chart because I was thinking about making a cumulative frequency table for it or something, but I found that the percentages only add up to 97% when they should add up to 100%, so could we correct this please? Thanks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
| Kinsey rank&lt;br /&gt;
| Percentage&lt;br /&gt;
| Cumulative freq.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| 12&lt;br /&gt;
| 12&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| 18&lt;br /&gt;
| 30&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| 18&lt;br /&gt;
| 48&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| 14&lt;br /&gt;
| 62&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4&lt;br /&gt;
| 11&lt;br /&gt;
| 73&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5&lt;br /&gt;
| 16&lt;br /&gt;
| 89&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6&lt;br /&gt;
| 8&lt;br /&gt;
| 97&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Total:&lt;br /&gt;
| 97%&lt;br /&gt;
| 97%&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Shia|Shia]] 17:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's just because they've been rounded down (like 12.9 -&amp;gt; 12). I'll add in the decimal points. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:04, 29 May 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FAOD Poll ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is a web-poll with 44 responses statistically solid?  Granted it's always difficult to get well-sampled and unbiased results about highly personal topics, but with fewer than a hundred or so responses and the fact that polls within a community tend to be unavoidably self-selecting there's so much potential bias in either direction that they could arguably be considered anecdotal. --[[User:Riismo|Riismo]] 22:21, 5 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some observations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are a few observations and speculations I've made regarding homosexuality in furry fandom.  Feel free to mull over these and offer any suggestions on whether you think they're accurate or not, and if so, whether they should be incorporated into the article (I am using the term &amp;quot;gays&amp;quot; throughout to represent both genders):&lt;br /&gt;
*The polls quoted here, and at least one other I'm aware of, suggest that the proportion of gays in furry fandom is approximately three times the proportion of gays in the general population;&lt;br /&gt;
*If that figure seems low, I can think of a few reasons why it might seem to be much higher:&lt;br /&gt;
**Gays are much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow furry fans than they are in other areas of their life, such as school and the workplace.  Statistically it may be true that 5-10% of the people at my workplace are gay, but I seldom find out who they are.  The proportion of gays among furries may only be 3x what it is in my workplace, but the proportion of gays ''that I know about'' is far greater;&lt;br /&gt;
**Having a non-furry S.O. and having children (whether natural, adopted, or foster) are two factors that often result in a fan having less time and money to devote to things furry, and having to limit one's involvement due to other priorities.  Gays are more likely than straight folk to have an S.O. who is also a furry fan, and are less likely than straight folk to be raising children  (Granted, every individual's situation is different, but averaged over a large number of people I would be surprised if this is not the case);&lt;br /&gt;
*Gays already have to deal with the idea that one major area of their lives goes against what is considered normal by a large segment of society.  As such, the idea of having an interest that some would consider unusual or weird is not as big a leap as it is for someone who hasn't been down that road;&lt;br /&gt;
*How much greater is the awareness of the existence of furry fandom among gays compared to straights?  I honestly don't know, but if more people among any demographic (such as gays) knows of the existence of furry fandom, it follows that more people from among that group would become furry fans.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 20:05, 10 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some thoughts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Wouldn't it be nice if the table had each row color-coded? With the top one a certain solid color, the bottom one another solid color, and the middle row a blend of the two? I suggest a red-blue or a yellow-blue pattern.* I have no idea how to do this, but the syntax might be on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Table#Examples this wiki help page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Dr.Kinsey's ''Sexual Behavior in the Human Male'' found that &amp;quot;46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or &amp;quot;reacted to&amp;quot; persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives&amp;quot;. In addition, &amp;quot;Kinsey said in both the Male and Female volumes that it was impossible to determine the number of persons who are &amp;quot;homosexual&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;heterosexual&amp;quot;. It was only possible to determine behavior at any given time&amp;quot;- &amp;quot;10% of males in the sample were predominantly homosexual between the ages of 16 and 55&amp;quot;. See [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Am I arguing that furry fandom is represenative of the general population? No. However, I think that the article really needs some necessary context. In the world [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAH_mjLhreE that most people live in], someone with the genetic background/social background of a 1/2, 1, 2, or a 2 1/2- et cetera- would probably self-identify as 'straight' throughout their life. The same might not be true for furries.** &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; One could argue that the color red signifies 'bad' or the color yellow signifies 'sickly'. I don't know. It's just a suggestion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;**&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; I say &amp;quot;might&amp;quot; because, well, how would [[mundane|I]] know?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 05:13, 26 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gay-&amp;gt;Sexual preference? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This use to be the [[Gay]] article (?.) Why try to overwrite the original entry with another subject instead of starting a new one (&amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot;,) and migrate the pertinent (&amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot;) data to it?. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, you got an article with several subjects/ideas/opinions trying to make a (several) point(s) while making none (i.e &amp;quot;''the term 'sexual preference' is more broad and includes personal attitudes in between the '''three''' general categories defined as sexual orientations,...''&amp;quot; Three, but the following paragraph now lists five,)...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article seems to be in a dire need of a top to bottom cleanup/revamp =P [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 01:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:...And, why so many redirects for a single article? ¬_¬ [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 01:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I merged 'heterosexual' and 'bisexual' into 'homosexual' since the two articles were one-/two-sentences stubs with little hope of future content. None of the information that was in the original 'homosexual' article has been removed. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 01:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't see what specifically needs to be cleaned-up besides the lead paragraph, which I fiddled with a little bit. What sections need revising? [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 02:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::In very simple terms:&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Lead paragraph''': What Sexual preference is (very brief initial description of a mainstream term/concept.) &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Lesbianism&amp;quot; '''is''' '''homosexuality.''' The addition of &amp;quot;Asexuals&amp;quot; is splitting hairs, and going beyond the furry point of the article (specially if we are making the initial point of only &amp;quot;three&amp;quot; types of &amp;quot;sexual preferences.&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Sexual preferences and furry''' section: An explanation of how does &amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot; related to furry, with the &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; topic the most discussed/best known angle. The initial article (&amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot;) covered the concept, myth and stereotyping of homosexuality in regard to the fandom from this point on, but that point broke when the article moved to cover &amp;quot;sexual preference,&amp;quot; so we get directed immediately to the established gay views of &amp;quot;Non-furries&amp;quot; and fandom, and a lack of studies on &amp;quot;homosexuality&amp;quot; in it, and the general populace. By the end of this article there's still no explanation or correlation between &amp;quot;Sexual preference and furry.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Categorization''' section: All related (exclusively) to the &amp;quot;gay&amp;quot; sexual preference, but nothing to tie it to it's relation to the furry fandom, or &amp;quot;sexual preferences&amp;quot; in general for that matter.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Social attitudes among furries''': Again, solely concentrated around the social and religious attitude of &amp;quot;gay sexuality&amp;quot; within the fandom (the &amp;quot;heterosexual,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;bisexual,&amp;quot; and for that matter, &amp;quot;asexual&amp;quot; sexual preference views have yet to make an appearance, if you noticed.)&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?''' (or '''Homosexuality within the fandom''') section: A good section to follow '''after''' establishing the types of &amp;quot;Sexual preferences&amp;quot; in furry. Move the &amp;quot;non-furry&amp;quot; opinion to it under, maybe, '''A non-furry view of Homosexuality and furry'''.	&lt;br /&gt;
**'''General surveys''' section. Why?. This can easily be integrated inside the '''Fandom surveys''' section (we are still trying to show the furry's angle on this article, no mainstream's.)	&lt;br /&gt;
::::So, as it stands right now, we are not presenting how &amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot; relates to furry fandom accurately right now. Plenty regarding &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; sexual preferences, but that's because that the article was originally about it and furry, before it being renamed. [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 03:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Good points all. The article still needs expansion.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Some thoughts:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The '''Sexual preferences and furry''' section was intially part of the introduction. I don't know how the stuff in the lead section that's about the furry=gay idea got moved into it's own section. If it was a edit done by me, it was a mistake.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I added 'asexual' to the description after finding out that [http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Search?search=asexual at least three popular furries] are 'asexual'. But if it's rare, it shouldn't really be mentioned in the article at all.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I know that '''gay''' means '''homosexual''', but the term '''gay''' is also used a lot to describe all non-straight people-- homosexuals and bisexuals alike.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The '''categorization''' section is 'furry'-relevent since some furries believe that the gay\straight and male/female dictomy is false and think that people can express a variety of attractions throughout their life. The section does need rewording to make this clear.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''Social attitudes among furries''': Furries are people, and- like people-, some furries are homophobic. This should be mentioned. The section does have a weak title, though. A clearer title would be '''homophobia among furries''', but I didn't use that because I really hate stamping the pejorative political label 'homophobic' on furries who are just exercising their sincerely held religious beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?''': I agree that this belongs right below the introduction. I also think that the '''general surveys''' subsection about non-furries should be seperate from the '''fandom surveys''' subsection since the entire point is to illustrate the contrast.  [[User:24.32.208.58|24.32.208.58]] 07:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Why not have a lot of redirects? The words being re-directed- Sexual orientation, Sexual orientations, Sexual Preferences, homosexuals, homosexuality, gay, gays, et cetera- all fall clearly under this article. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 02:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::'''Gay''', makes sense, '''Homosexual''', yes, '''Homoerotic''', kind of redundant, but...; '''Gays''', uh, that's covered by &amp;quot;Gay,&amp;quot; just enter it on the search box, it will come up; '''Homosexuals''',... all right, getting to &amp;quot;Redundant City&amp;quot; pluralized territory. In other words, we don't need to cover with redirects such a well known, mainstream term. =P [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 03:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The fact that 'homoerotic' redirects here is news to me. That should be changed. The plural redirects are redundant, yes, but I guess I'm used to it from having done it in Wikipedia editing when plurals might generate unhelpful searches. [[User:24.32.208.58|24.32.208.58]] 07:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I edited the lead section so it is now structured more simply and more logically. It mentions the three orientations, then it describes those three orientations, then it describes the term 'gay'- which has three different meanings-, and then it describes the rare exception to all orientations. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 02:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::...Which still presents this article as one about &amp;quot;gay&amp;quot; sexual preferences, not about &amp;quot;sexual preferences&amp;quot; and its relation to furry. This breakdown of the definition of &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; would be more at home on the '''Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?''' (or '''Homosexuality within the fandom''', or simply, '''Homosexuality and furry''') section. [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 03:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''Which still presents this article as one about &amp;quot;gay&amp;quot; sexual preferences'' How so? The intro defines the term 'sexual preference' in detail, then it notes the multiple definitions of 'gay', and then it says what the sexual preferences in the fandom are (or at least it did, until those sentences were moved for some reason).&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''So, as it stands right now, we are not presenting how &amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot; relates to furry fandom accurately right now. Plenty regarding &amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot; sexual preferences'' In real life, 95% of people are straight. In the fandom, it's between a low of 13% or a high of 53%. The article is gay-centric because, well, most furries are gay. [[User:24.32.208.58|24.32.208.58]] 07:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Regardless, your central point about the sections being jumbled up is definately right. [[User:24.32.208.58|24.32.208.58]] 07:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I moved around the sections. I think that the article flows better now. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 00:05, 4 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Preference or orientation? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should this article be retitled ''Sexual orientation''?  The reason I ask is because certain anti-gay factions prefer the term &amp;quot;sexual preference&amp;quot; over &amp;quot;sexual orientation&amp;quot; because the former carries a stronger implication that being gay or lesbian is a choice. --[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 14:10, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation</id>
		<title>Sexual orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-04T00:03:52Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{cleanup}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{context}}&lt;br /&gt;
''This page is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Orphan orphaned] since few other WikiFur articles link to it. [http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/WikiFur:About You can help!]'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gay_flag.png|right|thumb|150px|The rainbow flag associated with [[wikipedia:homosexuality|homosexuality]] in and out of the [[furry fandom|fandom]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sexual preference''' describes the gender or genders that someone feels sexually attracted to. The term [[wikipedia:Sexual_orientation|'''sexual orientation''']] is often used interchangably, but the term 'sexual preference' is more broad and includes personal attitudes in between the three general categories defined as [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientations]]: [[Wikipedia:Heterosexuality|'''Heterosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the opposite gender. [[Wikipedia:Bisexuality|'''Bisexuality''']] is the sexual attraction to members of both sexes, [[male]] and [[female]]. [[wikipedia:homosexuality|'''Homosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the same gender.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term '''gay''' has three different meanings. First, it is occasionally used synonymously with '''homosexual'''. Second, and most oftenly, it is used to refer specifically to [[male|male/male]] attraction while the term '''[[Wikipedia:lesbian|lesbian]]''' refers to [[female|female/female]] attraction. Third, '''gay''' is sometimes used inaccurately to refer to both homosexuals and bisexuals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[non-furry|Non-furries]] generally believe the [[stereotype]] that a significantly larger proportion of the [[furry fandom]] is homosexual or bisexual compared to the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; A lack of completely reliable survey data exists within both the fandom&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The studies that have been done suggest the [[stereotype]] is partially true, though not to the large extent that is often suggested.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Furries have suggested various theories for this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?==&lt;br /&gt;
===Fandom surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are multiple estimates of the percentage of gays in the furry fandom. It is often thought within the fandom that the number is high, possibly as high as 90%,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; but polls have shown differences in estimation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A 2007 [[Wikipedia:University of California, Davis|University of California at Davis]] study found that 37.3% of respondents were bisexual, 32.7% heterosexual, 25.5% homosexual, and 8% were [[Wikipedia:questioning (sexuality)|uncertain]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://studyf3.livejournal.com/1383.html &amp;quot;Furry Survey Results&amp;quot;] from University of California, Davis: Department of Psychology. Published 2007-05-05. Accessed 2007-05-05.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll used in ''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], showed 25% heterosexual, 19% homosexual, and 48% bisexual out of 360 peopled polled.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Sociology of Furry Fandom]. Retrieved October 19, 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rust concluded that &amp;quot;Truth be told, there are many more homosexual members of the fandom than in general society.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll (of indeterminable date, but before 2005) on the [[IFPL]] used the [[Wikipedia:Kinsey scale|Kinsey scale]] to rate the measure of homosexuality in respondents:&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin: 1em 1em 1em 0; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px #aaa solid; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 95%;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #C6E3FF&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 12.9%&lt;br /&gt;
| (63/487)&lt;br /&gt;
| 0 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively heterosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #A7B1EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.3%&lt;br /&gt;
| (89/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 1 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CBABE2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.7%&lt;br /&gt;
| (91/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, more than incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CF71EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 14.8%&lt;br /&gt;
| (72/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| Equally heterosexual and homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #DF99D4&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 11.3% &lt;br /&gt;
| (55/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 4 &lt;br /&gt;
|Predominately homosexual, more than incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #F79FD1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 16.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (78/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 5 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately homosexual, incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #FFB1D8&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 8.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (39/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 6 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively homosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* A 2006 [http://faod.org/ FAOD] poll showed 25% heterosexual, 20% homosexual, and 55% bisexual (out of 44 polled)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://faod.org/index.php?topic=179.0 FAOD Message Board]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furtopia]] poll (open 2003 to present) stated that 53% were heterosexual, 15% gay, and 30% bisexual out of 862 people polled.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://cgi.furtopia.org/cgi-bin/ib311/ikonboard.cgi?s=411086f03c728556d957bd1ffd9b528a;act=ST;f=77;t=9074 Furtopia Message Board] Retrieved September 5, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furry_Survey|poll]] by [[Alex Osaki]] reported that 42.75% were heterosexual, 16.86% were homosexual, 35.29% were bisexual, and 4.71% self-identified as neither.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey.php Furry Poll Results] as of December 30, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===General surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
Estimates of the incidence of homosexuality in the general population vary greatly, due in part to the lack of reliable survey data and the difficulty in defining [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_orientation sexual orientations].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Retrieved September 28th, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey's]] work ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male|Sexual Behavior in the Human Male]]'' found that &amp;quot;46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or &amp;quot;reacted to&amp;quot; persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives&amp;quot;. In addition, the book stated that &amp;quot;10% of males in the sample were predominantly homosexual between the ages of 16 and 55&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html Research Summary] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Kinsey's book, and its companion ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Female|Sexual Behavior in the Human Female]]'', have received [[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male#Criticism|vocal criticism]] for their findings and methodology.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/reisman.html &amp;quot;Kinsey and the Homosexual Revolution&amp;quot;] by [[Wikipedia: Judith Reisman|Dr. Judith Reisman]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.swlearning.com/quant/kohler/stat/biographical_sketches/bio15.1.html Biography of Statician] [[Wikipedia:John Tukey|John W. Tukey]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:American conservative|American conservative]] [[Wikipedia:magazine|magazine]] ''[[Wikipedia:Human Events|Human Events]]'' calls the Kinsey Report the fourth [http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=7591 Most Harmful Book of the 19th and 20th Centuries].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Catholic Church|Roman Catholic]] [[Wikipedia:Higher education in the United States|educational association]] '''[[Wikipedia:Intercollegiate Studies Institute|The Intercollegiate Studies Institute]]''' called it &amp;quot;A pervert's attempt to demonstrate that perversion is &amp;quot;statistically&amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; and the third [http://www.mmisi.org/ir/35_01/50worst.pdf &amp;quot;Worst Book of the Century&amp;quot;].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''[[Wikipedia:The New York Times|The New York Times]]'' called his research &amp;quot;conscientious and comprehensive&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pomeroy, Wardell (1972). Dr. Kinsey and the Institute for Sex Research. New York: Harper &amp;amp; Row.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Professor [[Wikipedia:Martin Duberman|Martin Duberman]] called it &amp;quot;skillful&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;a monumental endeavor&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/publications/duberman.html Book review of] '''[http://www.amazon.com/Alfred-C-Kinsey-Public-Private/dp/0393040860 Alfred C. Kinsey : A Public/Private Life]''' originally published in ''[[Wikipedia:The Nation|The Nation]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several recent surveys done in [[Wikipedia:Western world|Western countries]] such as [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]], [[Wikipedia:Australia|Australia]], and the [[Wikipedia:United States|United States]] typically define between 1% and 10% of the general population, which an average around 5%, as homosexual or bisexual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Accessed December 31, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The British government conducted a country-wide survey in 2005 as part of the [[Wikipedia:Civil_Partnership_Act_2004|''Civil Partnership Act'']]. This study, the only official government study of its kind, stated that 6% of the [[Wikipedia:United Kingdom|United Kingdom]] would be interested in forming a [[Wikipedia:civil union|civil union]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nihe.gov.uk/publications/consultation_documents/Draft%20Policy%20Statement%20on%20SO%20Dec06.pdf Sexual Orientation Policy Statement Draft for Consultation] (pdf)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Theories===&lt;br /&gt;
One viable theory involves [[Mark Merlino]], a former chair of [[ConFurence]] who co-founded the first furry [[conventions]]. [[Crush Yiff Destroy]] has suggested that Merlino actively recruited alternative lifestylers into the fandom, and that this influences furry demographics to this day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.crushyiffdestroy.com/show/merlino &amp;quot;Journey to the Center of Mark Merlino&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Furries also guess that, since having a [[non-furry]] significant other and raising children may result in a fan having less time and money to devote to the fandom, gays are over-represented because they are less likely to be raising children.{{fact}} Some speculate that the negative [[Wikipedia:social stigma|social stigma]] [[Wikipedia:Furry fandom#Media coverage|attached to the fandom]] keeps away heterosexual [[mundanes]] who would otherwise feel interested. David Rust has stated that &amp;quot;The social variations for Furries may seem unusual from a generic, American viewpoint. However, from the position of a group of people who are already predisposed to enjoying anthropomorphic animals, other concepts such as homosexuality... seem somewhat mundane and unimportant by comparison.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Others guess that gays are not over-represented, but that they are simply much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow fans than they are in other areas of their life.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
One other theory is that the demographics of the fandom is reasonably close to the general population. It just happens that people who become furries, a [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']] of sorts, become more exposed to alternate lifestyles and may reconsider their own sexuality, which might result in a paralell [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']].{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Categorization==&lt;br /&gt;
The current [[Wikipedia:scientific consensus|scientific consensus]] advocated by various social and educational organizations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;such as the [[Wikipedia:American Psychiatric Association|American Psychiatric Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Psychological Association|American Psychological Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Counseling Association|American Counseling Association]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of Social Workers|National Association of Social Workers]], the [[Wikipedia:American Academy of Pediatrics|American Academy of Pediatrics]], the [[Wikipedia:American Association of School Administrators|American Association of School Administrators]], the [[Wikipedia:American Federation of Teachers|American Federation of Teachers]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of School Psychologists|National Association of School Psychologists]], and the [[Wikipedia:National Education Association|National Education Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is that people develop their own permanent, unchangeable [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientation]] within one of the three categories in their [[Wikipedia:childhood|early childhood]] as [[Wikipedia:Biology and sexual orientation|a combination of genetic tendencies and their social environment]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/publications/justthefacts.html Just the Facts About Sexual Orientation &amp;amp; Youth: A Primer for Principals, Educators and School Personnel] 1999, American Psychological Association&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minority of researchers, sometimes known as [[Wikipedia:Queer theory|'queer theorists']], believe that the concept of sexual orientations is a [[Wikipedia:social construct|social construct]] and that people naturally exhibit a variety of attractions. [[Pressed Fur]] reports that some furries also subscribe to this view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pressedfur.coolfreepages.com/essay/postvixen/index.html &amp;quot;Sitting On the Third Side of the Fence&amp;quot;] by Hannah Kincaid from [[Pressed Fur]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although he did not advocate the social construct theory, [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey]] stated that &amp;quot;[[Males]] do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual... The living world is a continuum in each and every one of its aspects.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-hhscale.html &amp;quot;Kinsey's Heterosexual-Homosexual Rating Scale&amp;quot;] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He postulated a [[Wikipedia:Kinsey Scale|scale]] of sexual preferences from zero to six, zero being exclusively heterosexual.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social attitudes among furries==&lt;br /&gt;
''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], found that &amp;quot;race, religion and sexual orientation (as divisive factors) are simply too minor to attract any real attention&amp;quot; and that furries have &amp;quot;higher tolerance for variety in sexual orientation and activity&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A small yet significant minority of furries self-identify as [[Christian furs|Christian]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Some of them believe in the [[Wikipedia:the bible and homosexuality|traditional Christian view]] that homosexual conduct is immoral and that homosexuals should be [[Wikipedia:celibacy|celibate]]. Other [[Christian furs]] believe that the Bible verses and [[Wikipedia:sacred tradition|sacred traditions]] cited against homosexuality are misinterpreted.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark The furries of] '[[Rainbow Ark]]' [http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark/profile take this view]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Both sides maintain a cordial relationship with each other and try to promote mutual understanding.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; [http://www.gaychristian.net/greatdebate.php This website] summarizes the arguments in the debate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Relationship terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sociology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation</id>
		<title>Sexual orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-04T00:02:36Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* Social attitudes among furries */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{cleanup}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{context}}&lt;br /&gt;
''This page is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Orphan orphaned] since few other WikiFur articles link to it. [http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/WikiFur:About You can help!]'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gay_flag.png|right|thumb|150px|The rainbow flag associated with [[wikipedia:homosexuality|homosexuality]] in and out of the [[furry fandom|fandom]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sexual preference''' describes the gender or genders that someone feels sexually attracted to. The term [[wikipedia:Sexual_orientation|'''sexual orientation''']] is often used interchangably, but the term 'sexual preference' is more broad and includes personal attitudes in between the three general categories defined as [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientations]] that are listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Wikipedia:Heterosexuality|'''Heterosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the opposite gender. [[Wikipedia:Bisexuality|'''Bisexuality''']] is the sexual attraction to members of both sexes, [[male]] and [[female]]. [[wikipedia:homosexuality|'''Homosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the same gender.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term '''gay''' has three different meanings. First, it is occasionally used synonymously with '''homosexual'''. Second, and most oftenly, it is used to refer specifically to [[male|male/male]] attraction while the term '''[[Wikipedia:lesbian|lesbian]]''' refers to [[female|female/female]] attraction. Third, '''gay''' is sometimes used inaccurately to refer to both homosexuals and bisexuals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[non-furry|Non-furries]] generally believe the [[stereotype]] that a significantly larger proportion of the [[furry fandom]] is homosexual or bisexual compared to the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; A lack of completely reliable survey data exists within both the fandom&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The studies that have been done suggest the [[stereotype]] is partially true, though not to the large extent that is often suggested.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Furries have suggested various theories for this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?==&lt;br /&gt;
===Fandom surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are multiple estimates of the percentage of gays in the furry fandom. It is often thought within the fandom that the number is high, possibly as high as 90%,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; but polls have shown differences in estimation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A 2007 [[Wikipedia:University of California, Davis|University of California at Davis]] study found that 37.3% of respondents were bisexual, 32.7% heterosexual, 25.5% homosexual, and 8% were [[Wikipedia:questioning (sexuality)|uncertain]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://studyf3.livejournal.com/1383.html &amp;quot;Furry Survey Results&amp;quot;] from University of California, Davis: Department of Psychology. Published 2007-05-05. Accessed 2007-05-05.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll used in ''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], showed 25% heterosexual, 19% homosexual, and 48% bisexual out of 360 peopled polled.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Sociology of Furry Fandom]. Retrieved October 19, 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rust concluded that &amp;quot;Truth be told, there are many more homosexual members of the fandom than in general society.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll (of indeterminable date, but before 2005) on the [[IFPL]] used the [[Wikipedia:Kinsey scale|Kinsey scale]] to rate the measure of homosexuality in respondents:&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin: 1em 1em 1em 0; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px #aaa solid; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 95%;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #C6E3FF&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 12.9%&lt;br /&gt;
| (63/487)&lt;br /&gt;
| 0 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively heterosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #A7B1EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.3%&lt;br /&gt;
| (89/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 1 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CBABE2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.7%&lt;br /&gt;
| (91/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, more than incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CF71EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 14.8%&lt;br /&gt;
| (72/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| Equally heterosexual and homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #DF99D4&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 11.3% &lt;br /&gt;
| (55/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 4 &lt;br /&gt;
|Predominately homosexual, more than incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #F79FD1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 16.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (78/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 5 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately homosexual, incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #FFB1D8&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 8.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (39/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 6 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively homosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* A 2006 [http://faod.org/ FAOD] poll showed 25% heterosexual, 20% homosexual, and 55% bisexual (out of 44 polled)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://faod.org/index.php?topic=179.0 FAOD Message Board]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furtopia]] poll (open 2003 to present) stated that 53% were heterosexual, 15% gay, and 30% bisexual out of 862 people polled.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://cgi.furtopia.org/cgi-bin/ib311/ikonboard.cgi?s=411086f03c728556d957bd1ffd9b528a;act=ST;f=77;t=9074 Furtopia Message Board] Retrieved September 5, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furry_Survey|poll]] by [[Alex Osaki]] reported that 42.75% were heterosexual, 16.86% were homosexual, 35.29% were bisexual, and 4.71% self-identified as neither.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey.php Furry Poll Results] as of December 30, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===General surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
Estimates of the incidence of homosexuality in the general population vary greatly, due in part to the lack of reliable survey data and the difficulty in defining [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_orientation sexual orientations].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Retrieved September 28th, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey's]] work ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male|Sexual Behavior in the Human Male]]'' found that &amp;quot;46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or &amp;quot;reacted to&amp;quot; persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives&amp;quot;. In addition, the book stated that &amp;quot;10% of males in the sample were predominantly homosexual between the ages of 16 and 55&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html Research Summary] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Kinsey's book, and its companion ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Female|Sexual Behavior in the Human Female]]'', have received [[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male#Criticism|vocal criticism]] for their findings and methodology.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/reisman.html &amp;quot;Kinsey and the Homosexual Revolution&amp;quot;] by [[Wikipedia: Judith Reisman|Dr. Judith Reisman]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.swlearning.com/quant/kohler/stat/biographical_sketches/bio15.1.html Biography of Statician] [[Wikipedia:John Tukey|John W. Tukey]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:American conservative|American conservative]] [[Wikipedia:magazine|magazine]] ''[[Wikipedia:Human Events|Human Events]]'' calls the Kinsey Report the fourth [http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=7591 Most Harmful Book of the 19th and 20th Centuries].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Catholic Church|Roman Catholic]] [[Wikipedia:Higher education in the United States|educational association]] '''[[Wikipedia:Intercollegiate Studies Institute|The Intercollegiate Studies Institute]]''' called it &amp;quot;A pervert's attempt to demonstrate that perversion is &amp;quot;statistically&amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; and the third [http://www.mmisi.org/ir/35_01/50worst.pdf &amp;quot;Worst Book of the Century&amp;quot;].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''[[Wikipedia:The New York Times|The New York Times]]'' called his research &amp;quot;conscientious and comprehensive&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pomeroy, Wardell (1972). Dr. Kinsey and the Institute for Sex Research. New York: Harper &amp;amp; Row.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Professor [[Wikipedia:Martin Duberman|Martin Duberman]] called it &amp;quot;skillful&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;a monumental endeavor&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/publications/duberman.html Book review of] '''[http://www.amazon.com/Alfred-C-Kinsey-Public-Private/dp/0393040860 Alfred C. Kinsey : A Public/Private Life]''' originally published in ''[[Wikipedia:The Nation|The Nation]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several recent surveys done in [[Wikipedia:Western world|Western countries]] such as [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]], [[Wikipedia:Australia|Australia]], and the [[Wikipedia:United States|United States]] typically define between 1% and 10% of the general population, which an average around 5%, as homosexual or bisexual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Accessed December 31, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The British government conducted a country-wide survey in 2005 as part of the [[Wikipedia:Civil_Partnership_Act_2004|''Civil Partnership Act'']]. This study, the only official government study of its kind, stated that 6% of the [[Wikipedia:United Kingdom|United Kingdom]] would be interested in forming a [[Wikipedia:civil union|civil union]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nihe.gov.uk/publications/consultation_documents/Draft%20Policy%20Statement%20on%20SO%20Dec06.pdf Sexual Orientation Policy Statement Draft for Consultation] (pdf)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Theories===&lt;br /&gt;
One viable theory involves [[Mark Merlino]], a former chair of [[ConFurence]] who co-founded the first furry [[conventions]]. [[Crush Yiff Destroy]] has suggested that Merlino actively recruited alternative lifestylers into the fandom, and that this influences furry demographics to this day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.crushyiffdestroy.com/show/merlino &amp;quot;Journey to the Center of Mark Merlino&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Furries also guess that, since having a [[non-furry]] significant other and raising children may result in a fan having less time and money to devote to the fandom, gays are over-represented because they are less likely to be raising children.{{fact}} Some speculate that the negative [[Wikipedia:social stigma|social stigma]] [[Wikipedia:Furry fandom#Media coverage|attached to the fandom]] keeps away heterosexual [[mundanes]] who would otherwise feel interested. David Rust has stated that &amp;quot;The social variations for Furries may seem unusual from a generic, American viewpoint. However, from the position of a group of people who are already predisposed to enjoying anthropomorphic animals, other concepts such as homosexuality... seem somewhat mundane and unimportant by comparison.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Others guess that gays are not over-represented, but that they are simply much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow fans than they are in other areas of their life.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
One other theory is that the demographics of the fandom is reasonably close to the general population. It just happens that people who become furries, a [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']] of sorts, become more exposed to alternate lifestyles and may reconsider their own sexuality, which might result in a paralell [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']].{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Categorization==&lt;br /&gt;
The current [[Wikipedia:scientific consensus|scientific consensus]] advocated by various social and educational organizations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;such as the [[Wikipedia:American Psychiatric Association|American Psychiatric Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Psychological Association|American Psychological Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Counseling Association|American Counseling Association]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of Social Workers|National Association of Social Workers]], the [[Wikipedia:American Academy of Pediatrics|American Academy of Pediatrics]], the [[Wikipedia:American Association of School Administrators|American Association of School Administrators]], the [[Wikipedia:American Federation of Teachers|American Federation of Teachers]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of School Psychologists|National Association of School Psychologists]], and the [[Wikipedia:National Education Association|National Education Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is that people develop their own permanent, unchangeable [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientation]] within one of the three categories in their [[Wikipedia:childhood|early childhood]] as [[Wikipedia:Biology and sexual orientation|a combination of genetic tendencies and their social environment]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/publications/justthefacts.html Just the Facts About Sexual Orientation &amp;amp; Youth: A Primer for Principals, Educators and School Personnel] 1999, American Psychological Association&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minority of researchers, sometimes known as [[Wikipedia:Queer theory|'queer theorists']], believe that the concept of sexual orientations is a [[Wikipedia:social construct|social construct]] and that people naturally exhibit a variety of attractions. [[Pressed Fur]] reports that some furries also subscribe to this view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pressedfur.coolfreepages.com/essay/postvixen/index.html &amp;quot;Sitting On the Third Side of the Fence&amp;quot;] by Hannah Kincaid from [[Pressed Fur]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although he did not advocate the social construct theory, [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey]] stated that &amp;quot;[[Males]] do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual... The living world is a continuum in each and every one of its aspects.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-hhscale.html &amp;quot;Kinsey's Heterosexual-Homosexual Rating Scale&amp;quot;] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He postulated a [[Wikipedia:Kinsey Scale|scale]] of sexual preferences from zero to six, zero being exclusively heterosexual.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social attitudes among furries==&lt;br /&gt;
''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], found that &amp;quot;race, religion and sexual orientation (as divisive factors) are simply too minor to attract any real attention&amp;quot; and that furries have &amp;quot;higher tolerance for variety in sexual orientation and activity&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A small yet significant minority of furries self-identify as [[Christian furs|Christian]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Some of them believe in the [[Wikipedia:the bible and homosexuality|traditional Christian view]] that homosexual conduct is immoral and that homosexuals should be [[Wikipedia:celibacy|celibate]]. Other [[Christian furs]] believe that the Bible verses and [[Wikipedia:sacred tradition|sacred traditions]] cited against homosexuality are misinterpreted.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark The furries of] '[[Rainbow Ark]]' [http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark/profile take this view]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Both sides maintain a cordial relationship with each other and try to promote mutual understanding.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; [http://www.gaychristian.net/greatdebate.php This website] summarizes the arguments in the debate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Relationship terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sociology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation</id>
		<title>Sexual orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-04T00:00:21Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: Man, I need to learn to spell correctly&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{cleanup}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{context}}&lt;br /&gt;
''This page is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Orphan orphaned] since few other WikiFur articles link to it. [http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/WikiFur:About You can help!]'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gay_flag.png|right|thumb|150px|The rainbow flag associated with [[wikipedia:homosexuality|homosexuality]] in and out of the [[furry fandom|fandom]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sexual preference''' describes the gender or genders that someone feels sexually attracted to. The term [[wikipedia:Sexual_orientation|'''sexual orientation''']] is often used interchangably, but the term 'sexual preference' is more broad and includes personal attitudes in between the three general categories defined as [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientations]] that are listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Wikipedia:Heterosexuality|'''Heterosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the opposite gender. [[Wikipedia:Bisexuality|'''Bisexuality''']] is the sexual attraction to members of both sexes, [[male]] and [[female]]. [[wikipedia:homosexuality|'''Homosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the same gender.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term '''gay''' has three different meanings. First, it is occasionally used synonymously with '''homosexual'''. Second, and most oftenly, it is used to refer specifically to [[male|male/male]] attraction while the term '''[[Wikipedia:lesbian|lesbian]]''' refers to [[female|female/female]] attraction. Third, '''gay''' is sometimes used inaccurately to refer to both homosexuals and bisexuals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[non-furry|Non-furries]] generally believe the [[stereotype]] that a significantly larger proportion of the [[furry fandom]] is homosexual or bisexual compared to the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; A lack of completely reliable survey data exists within both the fandom&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The studies that have been done suggest the [[stereotype]] is partially true, though not to the large extent that is often suggested.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Furries have suggested various theories for this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?==&lt;br /&gt;
===Fandom surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are multiple estimates of the percentage of gays in the furry fandom. It is often thought within the fandom that the number is high, possibly as high as 90%,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; but polls have shown differences in estimation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A 2007 [[Wikipedia:University of California, Davis|University of California at Davis]] study found that 37.3% of respondents were bisexual, 32.7% heterosexual, 25.5% homosexual, and 8% were [[Wikipedia:questioning (sexuality)|uncertain]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://studyf3.livejournal.com/1383.html &amp;quot;Furry Survey Results&amp;quot;] from University of California, Davis: Department of Psychology. Published 2007-05-05. Accessed 2007-05-05.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll used in ''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], showed 25% heterosexual, 19% homosexual, and 48% bisexual out of 360 peopled polled.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Sociology of Furry Fandom]. Retrieved October 19, 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rust concluded that &amp;quot;Truth be told, there are many more homosexual members of the fandom than in general society.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll (of indeterminable date, but before 2005) on the [[IFPL]] used the [[Wikipedia:Kinsey scale|Kinsey scale]] to rate the measure of homosexuality in respondents:&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin: 1em 1em 1em 0; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px #aaa solid; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 95%;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #C6E3FF&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 12.9%&lt;br /&gt;
| (63/487)&lt;br /&gt;
| 0 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively heterosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #A7B1EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.3%&lt;br /&gt;
| (89/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 1 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CBABE2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.7%&lt;br /&gt;
| (91/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, more than incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CF71EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 14.8%&lt;br /&gt;
| (72/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| Equally heterosexual and homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #DF99D4&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 11.3% &lt;br /&gt;
| (55/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 4 &lt;br /&gt;
|Predominately homosexual, more than incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #F79FD1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 16.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (78/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 5 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately homosexual, incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #FFB1D8&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 8.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (39/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 6 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively homosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* A 2006 [http://faod.org/ FAOD] poll showed 25% heterosexual, 20% homosexual, and 55% bisexual (out of 44 polled)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://faod.org/index.php?topic=179.0 FAOD Message Board]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furtopia]] poll (open 2003 to present) stated that 53% were heterosexual, 15% gay, and 30% bisexual out of 862 people polled.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://cgi.furtopia.org/cgi-bin/ib311/ikonboard.cgi?s=411086f03c728556d957bd1ffd9b528a;act=ST;f=77;t=9074 Furtopia Message Board] Retrieved September 5, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furry_Survey|poll]] by [[Alex Osaki]] reported that 42.75% were heterosexual, 16.86% were homosexual, 35.29% were bisexual, and 4.71% self-identified as neither.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey.php Furry Poll Results] as of December 30, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===General surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
Estimates of the incidence of homosexuality in the general population vary greatly, due in part to the lack of reliable survey data and the difficulty in defining [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_orientation sexual orientations].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Retrieved September 28th, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey's]] work ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male|Sexual Behavior in the Human Male]]'' found that &amp;quot;46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or &amp;quot;reacted to&amp;quot; persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives&amp;quot;. In addition, the book stated that &amp;quot;10% of males in the sample were predominantly homosexual between the ages of 16 and 55&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html Research Summary] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Kinsey's book, and its companion ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Female|Sexual Behavior in the Human Female]]'', have received [[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male#Criticism|vocal criticism]] for their findings and methodology.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/reisman.html &amp;quot;Kinsey and the Homosexual Revolution&amp;quot;] by [[Wikipedia: Judith Reisman|Dr. Judith Reisman]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.swlearning.com/quant/kohler/stat/biographical_sketches/bio15.1.html Biography of Statician] [[Wikipedia:John Tukey|John W. Tukey]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:American conservative|American conservative]] [[Wikipedia:magazine|magazine]] ''[[Wikipedia:Human Events|Human Events]]'' calls the Kinsey Report the fourth [http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=7591 Most Harmful Book of the 19th and 20th Centuries].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Catholic Church|Roman Catholic]] [[Wikipedia:Higher education in the United States|educational association]] '''[[Wikipedia:Intercollegiate Studies Institute|The Intercollegiate Studies Institute]]''' called it &amp;quot;A pervert's attempt to demonstrate that perversion is &amp;quot;statistically&amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; and the third [http://www.mmisi.org/ir/35_01/50worst.pdf &amp;quot;Worst Book of the Century&amp;quot;].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''[[Wikipedia:The New York Times|The New York Times]]'' called his research &amp;quot;conscientious and comprehensive&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pomeroy, Wardell (1972). Dr. Kinsey and the Institute for Sex Research. New York: Harper &amp;amp; Row.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Professor [[Wikipedia:Martin Duberman|Martin Duberman]] called it &amp;quot;skillful&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;a monumental endeavor&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/publications/duberman.html Book review of] '''[http://www.amazon.com/Alfred-C-Kinsey-Public-Private/dp/0393040860 Alfred C. Kinsey : A Public/Private Life]''' originally published in ''[[Wikipedia:The Nation|The Nation]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several recent surveys done in [[Wikipedia:Western world|Western countries]] such as [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]], [[Wikipedia:Australia|Australia]], and the [[Wikipedia:United States|United States]] typically define between 1% and 10% of the general population, which an average around 5%, as homosexual or bisexual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Accessed December 31, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The British government conducted a country-wide survey in 2005 as part of the [[Wikipedia:Civil_Partnership_Act_2004|''Civil Partnership Act'']]. This study, the only official government study of its kind, stated that 6% of the [[Wikipedia:United Kingdom|United Kingdom]] would be interested in forming a [[Wikipedia:civil union|civil union]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nihe.gov.uk/publications/consultation_documents/Draft%20Policy%20Statement%20on%20SO%20Dec06.pdf Sexual Orientation Policy Statement Draft for Consultation] (pdf)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Theories===&lt;br /&gt;
One viable theory involves [[Mark Merlino]], a former chair of [[ConFurence]] who co-founded the first furry [[conventions]]. [[Crush Yiff Destroy]] has suggested that Merlino actively recruited alternative lifestylers into the fandom, and that this influences furry demographics to this day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.crushyiffdestroy.com/show/merlino &amp;quot;Journey to the Center of Mark Merlino&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Furries also guess that, since having a [[non-furry]] significant other and raising children may result in a fan having less time and money to devote to the fandom, gays are over-represented because they are less likely to be raising children.{{fact}} Some speculate that the negative [[Wikipedia:social stigma|social stigma]] [[Wikipedia:Furry fandom#Media coverage|attached to the fandom]] keeps away heterosexual [[mundanes]] who would otherwise feel interested. David Rust has stated that &amp;quot;The social variations for Furries may seem unusual from a generic, American viewpoint. However, from the position of a group of people who are already predisposed to enjoying anthropomorphic animals, other concepts such as homosexuality... seem somewhat mundane and unimportant by comparison.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Others guess that gays are not over-represented, but that they are simply much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow fans than they are in other areas of their life.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
One other theory is that the demographics of the fandom is reasonably close to the general population. It just happens that people who become furries, a [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']] of sorts, become more exposed to alternate lifestyles and may reconsider their own sexuality, which might result in a paralell [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']].{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Categorization==&lt;br /&gt;
The current [[Wikipedia:scientific consensus|scientific consensus]] advocated by various social and educational organizations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;such as the [[Wikipedia:American Psychiatric Association|American Psychiatric Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Psychological Association|American Psychological Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Counseling Association|American Counseling Association]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of Social Workers|National Association of Social Workers]], the [[Wikipedia:American Academy of Pediatrics|American Academy of Pediatrics]], the [[Wikipedia:American Association of School Administrators|American Association of School Administrators]], the [[Wikipedia:American Federation of Teachers|American Federation of Teachers]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of School Psychologists|National Association of School Psychologists]], and the [[Wikipedia:National Education Association|National Education Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is that people develop their own permanent, unchangeable [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientation]] within one of the three categories in their [[Wikipedia:childhood|early childhood]] as [[Wikipedia:Biology and sexual orientation|a combination of genetic tendencies and their social environment]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/publications/justthefacts.html Just the Facts About Sexual Orientation &amp;amp; Youth: A Primer for Principals, Educators and School Personnel] 1999, American Psychological Association&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minority of researchers, sometimes known as [[Wikipedia:Queer theory|'queer theorists']], believe that the concept of sexual orientations is a [[Wikipedia:social construct|social construct]] and that people naturally exhibit a variety of attractions. [[Pressed Fur]] reports that some furries also subscribe to this view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pressedfur.coolfreepages.com/essay/postvixen/index.html &amp;quot;Sitting On the Third Side of the Fence&amp;quot;] by Hannah Kincaid from [[Pressed Fur]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although he did not advocate the social construct theory, [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey]] stated that &amp;quot;[[Males]] do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual... The living world is a continuum in each and every one of its aspects.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-hhscale.html &amp;quot;Kinsey's Heterosexual-Homosexual Rating Scale&amp;quot;] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He postulated a [[Wikipedia:Kinsey Scale|scale]] of sexual preferences from zero to six, zero being exclusively heterosexual.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social attitudes among furries==&lt;br /&gt;
''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], found that &amp;quot;race, religion and sexual orientation (as divisive factors) are simply too minor to attract any real attention&amp;quot; and that furries have &amp;quot;higher tolerance for variety in sexual orientation and activity&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A small yet significant minority of furries self-identify as [[Christian furs|Christian]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Some of them believe in the [[Wikipedia:the bible and homosexuality|traditional Christian view]] that homosexual conduct is immoral and that homosexuals should be [[Wikipedia:celibacy|celibate]]. Other [[Christian furs]] believe that the Bible verses and [[Wikipedia:sacred tradition|sacred traditions]] cited against homosexuality are misinterpreted.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark The furries of 'Rainbow Ark'] [http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark/profile take this view]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Both sides maintain a cordial relationship with each other and try to promote mutual understanding.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; [http://www.gaychristian.net/greatdebate.php This website] summarizes the arguments in the debate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Relationship terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sociology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation</id>
		<title>Sexual orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-03T23:59:43Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{cleanup}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{context}}&lt;br /&gt;
''This page is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Orphan orphaned] since few other WikiFur articles link to it. [http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/WikiFur:About You can help!]'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gay_flag.png|right|thumb|150px|The rainbow flag associated with [[wikipedia:homosexuality|homosexuality]] in and out of the [[furry fandom|fandom]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sexual preference''' describes the gender or genders that someone feels sexually attracted to. The term [[wikipedia:Sexual_orientation|'''sexual orientation''']] is often used interchangably, but the term 'sexual preference' is more broad and includes personal attitudes in between the three general categories defined as [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientations]] that are listed below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Wikipedia:Heterosexuality|'''Heterosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the opposite gender. [[Wikipedia:Bisexuality|'''Bisexuality''']] is the sexual attraction to members of both sexes, [[male]] and [[female]]. [[wikipedia:homosexuality|'''Homosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the same gender.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term '''gay''' has three different meanings. First, it is occasionally used synonymously with '''homosexual'''. Second, and most oftenly, it is used to refer specifically to [[male|male/male]] attraction while the term '''[[Wikipedia:lesbian|lesbian]]''' refers to [[female|female/female]] attraction. Third, '''gay''' is sometimes used inaccurately to refer to both homosexuals and bisexuals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[non-furry|Non-furries]] generally believe the [[sterotype]] that a significantly larger proportion of the [[furry fandom]] is homosexual or bisexual compared to the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; A lack of completely reliable survey data exists within both the fandom&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The studies that have been done suggest the [[steretype]] is partially true, though not to the large extent that is often suggested.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Furries have suggested various theories for this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?==&lt;br /&gt;
===Fandom surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are multiple estimates of the percentage of gays in the furry fandom. It is often thought within the fandom that the number is high, possibly as high as 90%,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; but polls have shown differences in estimation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A 2007 [[Wikipedia:University of California, Davis|University of California at Davis]] study found that 37.3% of respondents were bisexual, 32.7% heterosexual, 25.5% homosexual, and 8% were [[Wikipedia:questioning (sexuality)|uncertain]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://studyf3.livejournal.com/1383.html &amp;quot;Furry Survey Results&amp;quot;] from University of California, Davis: Department of Psychology. Published 2007-05-05. Accessed 2007-05-05.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll used in ''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], showed 25% heterosexual, 19% homosexual, and 48% bisexual out of 360 peopled polled.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Sociology of Furry Fandom]. Retrieved October 19, 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rust concluded that &amp;quot;Truth be told, there are many more homosexual members of the fandom than in general society.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll (of indeterminable date, but before 2005) on the [[IFPL]] used the [[Wikipedia:Kinsey scale|Kinsey scale]] to rate the measure of homosexuality in respondents:&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin: 1em 1em 1em 0; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px #aaa solid; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 95%;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #C6E3FF&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 12.9%&lt;br /&gt;
| (63/487)&lt;br /&gt;
| 0 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively heterosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #A7B1EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.3%&lt;br /&gt;
| (89/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 1 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CBABE2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.7%&lt;br /&gt;
| (91/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, more than incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CF71EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 14.8%&lt;br /&gt;
| (72/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| Equally heterosexual and homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #DF99D4&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 11.3% &lt;br /&gt;
| (55/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 4 &lt;br /&gt;
|Predominately homosexual, more than incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #F79FD1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 16.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (78/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 5 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately homosexual, incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #FFB1D8&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 8.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (39/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 6 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively homosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* A 2006 [http://faod.org/ FAOD] poll showed 25% heterosexual, 20% homosexual, and 55% bisexual (out of 44 polled)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://faod.org/index.php?topic=179.0 FAOD Message Board]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furtopia]] poll (open 2003 to present) stated that 53% were heterosexual, 15% gay, and 30% bisexual out of 862 people polled.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://cgi.furtopia.org/cgi-bin/ib311/ikonboard.cgi?s=411086f03c728556d957bd1ffd9b528a;act=ST;f=77;t=9074 Furtopia Message Board] Retrieved September 5, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furry_Survey|poll]] by [[Alex Osaki]] reported that 42.75% were heterosexual, 16.86% were homosexual, 35.29% were bisexual, and 4.71% self-identified as neither.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey.php Furry Poll Results] as of December 30, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===General surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
Estimates of the incidence of homosexuality in the general population vary greatly, due in part to the lack of reliable survey data and the difficulty in defining [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_orientation sexual orientations].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Retrieved September 28th, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey's]] work ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male|Sexual Behavior in the Human Male]]'' found that &amp;quot;46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or &amp;quot;reacted to&amp;quot; persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives&amp;quot;. In addition, the book stated that &amp;quot;10% of males in the sample were predominantly homosexual between the ages of 16 and 55&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html Research Summary] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Kinsey's book, and its companion ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Female|Sexual Behavior in the Human Female]]'', have received [[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male#Criticism|vocal criticism]] for their findings and methodology.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/reisman.html &amp;quot;Kinsey and the Homosexual Revolution&amp;quot;] by [[Wikipedia: Judith Reisman|Dr. Judith Reisman]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.swlearning.com/quant/kohler/stat/biographical_sketches/bio15.1.html Biography of Statician] [[Wikipedia:John Tukey|John W. Tukey]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:American conservative|American conservative]] [[Wikipedia:magazine|magazine]] ''[[Wikipedia:Human Events|Human Events]]'' calls the Kinsey Report the fourth [http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=7591 Most Harmful Book of the 19th and 20th Centuries].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Catholic Church|Roman Catholic]] [[Wikipedia:Higher education in the United States|educational association]] '''[[Wikipedia:Intercollegiate Studies Institute|The Intercollegiate Studies Institute]]''' called it &amp;quot;A pervert's attempt to demonstrate that perversion is &amp;quot;statistically&amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; and the third [http://www.mmisi.org/ir/35_01/50worst.pdf &amp;quot;Worst Book of the Century&amp;quot;].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''[[Wikipedia:The New York Times|The New York Times]]'' called his research &amp;quot;conscientious and comprehensive&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pomeroy, Wardell (1972). Dr. Kinsey and the Institute for Sex Research. New York: Harper &amp;amp; Row.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Professor [[Wikipedia:Martin Duberman|Martin Duberman]] called it &amp;quot;skillful&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;a monumental endeavor&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/publications/duberman.html Book review of] '''[http://www.amazon.com/Alfred-C-Kinsey-Public-Private/dp/0393040860 Alfred C. Kinsey : A Public/Private Life]''' originally published in ''[[Wikipedia:The Nation|The Nation]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several recent surveys done in [[Wikipedia:Western world|Western countries]] such as [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]], [[Wikipedia:Australia|Australia]], and the [[Wikipedia:United States|United States]] typically define between 1% and 10% of the general population, which an average around 5%, as homosexual or bisexual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Accessed December 31, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The British government conducted a country-wide survey in 2005 as part of the [[Wikipedia:Civil_Partnership_Act_2004|''Civil Partnership Act'']]. This study, the only official government study of its kind, stated that 6% of the [[Wikipedia:United Kingdom|United Kingdom]] would be interested in forming a [[Wikipedia:civil union|civil union]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nihe.gov.uk/publications/consultation_documents/Draft%20Policy%20Statement%20on%20SO%20Dec06.pdf Sexual Orientation Policy Statement Draft for Consultation] (pdf)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Theories===&lt;br /&gt;
One viable theory involves [[Mark Merlino]], a former chair of [[ConFurence]] who co-founded the first furry [[conventions]]. [[Crush Yiff Destroy]] has suggested that Merlino actively recruited alternative lifestylers into the fandom, and that this influences furry demographics to this day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.crushyiffdestroy.com/show/merlino &amp;quot;Journey to the Center of Mark Merlino&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Furries also guess that, since having a [[non-furry]] significant other and raising children may result in a fan having less time and money to devote to the fandom, gays are over-represented because they are less likely to be raising children.{{fact}} Some speculate that the negative [[Wikipedia:social stigma|social stigma]] [[Wikipedia:Furry fandom#Media coverage|attached to the fandom]] keeps away heterosexual [[mundanes]] who would otherwise feel interested. David Rust has stated that &amp;quot;The social variations for Furries may seem unusual from a generic, American viewpoint. However, from the position of a group of people who are already predisposed to enjoying anthropomorphic animals, other concepts such as homosexuality... seem somewhat mundane and unimportant by comparison.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Others guess that gays are not over-represented, but that they are simply much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow fans than they are in other areas of their life.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
One other theory is that the demographics of the fandom is reasonably close to the general population. It just happens that people who become furries, a [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']] of sorts, become more exposed to alternate lifestyles and may reconsider their own sexuality, which might result in a paralell [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']].{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Categorization==&lt;br /&gt;
The current [[Wikipedia:scientific consensus|scientific consensus]] advocated by various social and educational organizations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;such as the [[Wikipedia:American Psychiatric Association|American Psychiatric Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Psychological Association|American Psychological Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Counseling Association|American Counseling Association]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of Social Workers|National Association of Social Workers]], the [[Wikipedia:American Academy of Pediatrics|American Academy of Pediatrics]], the [[Wikipedia:American Association of School Administrators|American Association of School Administrators]], the [[Wikipedia:American Federation of Teachers|American Federation of Teachers]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of School Psychologists|National Association of School Psychologists]], and the [[Wikipedia:National Education Association|National Education Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is that people develop their own permanent, unchangeable [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientation]] within one of the three categories in their [[Wikipedia:childhood|early childhood]] as [[Wikipedia:Biology and sexual orientation|a combination of genetic tendencies and their social environment]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/publications/justthefacts.html Just the Facts About Sexual Orientation &amp;amp; Youth: A Primer for Principals, Educators and School Personnel] 1999, American Psychological Association&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minority of researchers, sometimes known as [[Wikipedia:Queer theory|'queer theorists']], believe that the concept of sexual orientations is a [[Wikipedia:social construct|social construct]] and that people naturally exhibit a variety of attractions. [[Pressed Fur]] reports that some furries also subscribe to this view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pressedfur.coolfreepages.com/essay/postvixen/index.html &amp;quot;Sitting On the Third Side of the Fence&amp;quot;] by Hannah Kincaid from [[Pressed Fur]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although he did not advocate the social construct theory, [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey]] stated that &amp;quot;[[Males]] do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual... The living world is a continuum in each and every one of its aspects.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-hhscale.html &amp;quot;Kinsey's Heterosexual-Homosexual Rating Scale&amp;quot;] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He postulated a [[Wikipedia:Kinsey Scale|scale]] of sexual preferences from zero to six, zero being exclusively heterosexual.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social attitudes among furries==&lt;br /&gt;
''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], found that &amp;quot;race, religion and sexual orientation (as divisive factors) are simply too minor to attract any real attention&amp;quot; and that furries have &amp;quot;higher tolerance for variety in sexual orientation and activity&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A small yet significant minority of furries self-identify as [[Christian furs|Christian]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Some of them believe in the [[Wikipedia:the bible and homosexuality|traditional Christian view]] that homosexual conduct is immoral and that homosexuals should be [[Wikipedia:celibacy|celibate]]. Other [[Christian furs]] believe that the Bible verses and [[Wikipedia:sacred tradition|sacred traditions]] cited against homosexuality are misinterpreted.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark The furries of 'Rainbow Ark'] [http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark/profile take this view]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Both sides maintain a cordial relationship with each other and try to promote mutual understanding.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; [http://www.gaychristian.net/greatdebate.php This website] summarizes the arguments in the debate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Relationship terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sociology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/User:Boingo</id>
		<title>User:Boingo</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/User:Boingo"/>
				<updated>2008-01-03T06:04:46Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* Status */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''This user is a [[Wikipedia:newbie|newbie]] to the [[furry fandom]]. He might lead to considerable [[Wikipedia:lol|lulz]]. [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:BITE|Be gentle]].''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;This is my private bed &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is where I lie at night &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Staring at a light bulb hanging on the ceiling &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waiting for a dream to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
come and get me out of here&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here in my humble room at night&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I often wonder what goes on out there&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
What makes them run so scared &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I often stare at the people passing by &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But they can't see me through my window shades&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Just like I'm not even there&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I know my problems aren't your fault &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I really want to know &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has it always been this way&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If you can find me&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Come and get me out of here&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- ''[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZJHgZX1yQk&amp;amp;NR=1 Private Life]'' by [[wikipedia:Oingo_Boingo|Oingo Boingo]] (of [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=universalmusicgroup Universal Media Group]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Info==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Status ===&lt;br /&gt;
I'm in the process of developing a [[fursona]]. He'll be [[fox|something like]] [[Kendricks]] only darker, scruffier, and not a bit- '''not a bit'''- toony. A significant handicap is my complete lack of [[furry art|any artistic skills]] whatsoever. I don't have a [[LiveJournal]], but I'm considering getting one. I would really, really, really like to attend a [[furry convention]]... But... I have a particulary mild [[wikipedia:Agoraphobia|agoraphobia]] that, while merely being annoying in everyday life, may become an issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first furry materials I read were [[Immelmann]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Concession]]'' and [[Jay Naylor]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Better Days]]''. I consider both of them to be relatively disturbing. In retrospect, I should have anticipated that. I'm currently reading [[Eric W. Schwartz]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Sabrina Online]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm someone of no particular importance (although I did pretty well on the [[Wikipedia:ACT (examination)|ACT]]) who likes [[Wikipedia:wiki|wiki]] editing (don't ask me why). I have no relation whatsoever to [http://purplelemon.homestead.com/files/decatpics.html 'Purple Lemon'], but more power to him (or her). [http://purplelemon.homestead.com/files/destalk.jpg This Elfman pic just kills me].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I first heard about furries from the infamous [[MTV]] 'Sex2K' episode. I didn't think about it much afterward until some [[wikipedia:unencyclopedia|unencyclopedia]] article lead me to look-up [[Pressed Fur]] website. I looked through that and then eventually stumbled onto here. I recently looked over some of the latest [http://www.hartfordadvocate.com/article.cfm?aid=3873 news] [http://www.memphisflyer.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A10121 articles]. So, it's [[wikipedia:Confirmation_bias|only just now sunk in]] that furries are not... [[stereotype|well, you know]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I once tried to set up a [http://en.wikipedia.org/ Wikipedia] account as [[wikipedia:User:Revolutionaryluddite|'Revolutionaryluddite']] only to [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Missing_Wikipedians#R|give up]] a few months afterward. I recieved a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Barnstars|barnstar]] for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&amp;amp;limit=500&amp;amp;target=Revolutionaryluddite my contributions], and I was also threatened with banning a couple times. I still make some sporadic edits now and then-- most of them [[Wikipedia:hard rock|music]] related. The internet's other [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=revolutionaryluddite 'Revolutionaryluddite'] is also me. Make of my eclectic taste in music what you will. [[User:24.32.208.58]] is me as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Name ===&lt;br /&gt;
My [[real life]] name is already being used by a prominent furry ([[User_talk:Boingo|Guess who?]] I'll give you a hint, there's more than one vowel in it). After deciding to create a username based on one of my favorite [[Wikipedia:rock band|bands]], I considered [[wikipedia:Cheap_Trick|Trixie]], [[wikipedia:Ramones|Ramone]], [[wikipedia:Iggy_Pop|Iggy]], [[wikipedia:Thin_Lizzy|Lizzy]], [[wikipedia:Tom_Scholz|Scholz]], [[wikipedia:Def_Leppard|Leppard]], [[wikipedia:Gary_Numan|Numan]], and [[wikipedia:black_crowes|Crowe]]. I picked this because it just sounds/looks good. I suppose that this would make a sweet [[fursona]] name-- [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=boingo+furry it still looks open]-- if I could think of a first name to go with it. Maybe 'Timmy' or 'Johnny' or something [[species]]-specific like '[[Kit]]' or '[[Todd]]'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== About me ===&lt;br /&gt;
When it comes to editing, I like links, single quotes, parenthesis, and citations with multiple links in them (oooh... delicious) and I tend to make a copious amount of spelling and grammar errors (How many can you spot on this page alone?). I wrote a long explanation of my personal beliefs/background/hobbies/whatever on my Wikipedia account for transparency's sake. That was deleted when that account was deleted. Two things that I feel like repeating:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My family is split between [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_American English] [[wikipedia:Fundamentalist_Christianity|Fundamentalist]] [[wikipedia:Lutheran|Lutherans]] (mother's side) and [[wikipedia:Irish_American|Irish]] [[wikipedia:Roman_Catholic_Church|Catholics]] (father's side). Most of them are [[wikipedia:United_States_Democratic_Party|Democrats]]. I self-identify as a [[wikipedia:Evangelicalism|'catholic evangelical']] or [[wikipedia:Evangelical_catholic|'evangelical catholic']].&lt;br /&gt;
*I used to believe in the [[Wikipedia:rapture|rapture]], [[Wikipedia:reparative therapy|reparative therapy]] for [[homosexuals]], and [[Wikipedia:intelligent design|intelligent design]]. I don't anymore, but I'm rather sensitive about it in spite of everything.&lt;br /&gt;
* I used to be a [[wikipedia:Robert_P._Casey|Bob Casey Democrat]] until I jumped ship in fall 2004. I [[wikipedia:Opposition_to_the_2003_Iraq_War#Religious_opposition|strongly opposed the initial invasion of Iraq]], however, I support the [[wikipedia:Iraq_War_troop_surge_of_2007|'surge']] and our continual deployment in the region (See [[wikipedia:Anthony_Zinni|Anthony Zinni]]). Politically, I call myself a [[wikipedia:consistent_life_ethic|'consistent life ethicist']] or a [[wikipedia:One_Nation_Conservative|'one nation conservative']].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's about it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FAQ ===&lt;br /&gt;
'''Revolutionaryluddite'?''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's a reference to the late and great cultural critic [[wikipedia:Neil_Postman|Neil Postman]]. As he has [http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/cyberspace/cyberspace_7-25.html pointed out],&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;If people are getting divorced and mistreating their children and their sexism and racism are blights on our social life, none of that has anything to do with inadequate information. Now, along comes cyberspace and the information superhighway, and everyone seems to have the idea that, ah, here we can do it; if only we can have more access to more information faster and in more diverse forms at long last, we'll be able to solve these problems.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/User:Boingo</id>
		<title>User:Boingo</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/User:Boingo"/>
				<updated>2008-01-03T06:03:31Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* Status */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''This user is a [[Wikipedia:newbie|newbie]] to the [[furry fandom]]. He might lead to considerable [[Wikipedia:lol|lulz]]. [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:BITE|Be gentle]].''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;This is my private bed &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is where I lie at night &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Staring at a light bulb hanging on the ceiling &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waiting for a dream to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
come and get me out of here&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here in my humble room at night&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I often wonder what goes on out there&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
What makes them run so scared &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I often stare at the people passing by &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But they can't see me through my window shades&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Just like I'm not even there&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I know my problems aren't your fault &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I really want to know &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has it always been this way&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If you can find me&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Come and get me out of here&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- ''[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZJHgZX1yQk&amp;amp;NR=1 Private Life]'' by [[wikipedia:Oingo_Boingo|Oingo Boingo]] (of [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=universalmusicgroup Universal Media Group]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Info==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Status ===&lt;br /&gt;
I'm in the process of developing a [[fursona]]. He'll be [[fox|something like]] [[Kendricks]] only darker, scruffier, and not a bit- '''not a bit'''- toony. A significant handicap is my complete lack of [[furry art|any artistic skills]] whatsoever. I don't have a [[LiveJournal]], but I'm considering getting one. I would really, really, really like to attend a [[furry convention]]... But... I have a particulary mild [[wikipedia:Agoraphobia|agoraphobia]] that, while merely being annoying in everyday life, may become issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first furry materials I read were [[Immelmann]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Concession]]'' and [[Jay Naylor]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Better Days]]''. I consider both of them to be relatively disturbing. In retrospect, I should have anticipated that. I'm currently reading [[Eric W. Schwartz]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Sabrina Online]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm someone of no particular importance (although I did pretty well on the [[Wikipedia:ACT (examination)|ACT]]) who likes [[Wikipedia:wiki|wiki]] editing (don't ask me why). I have no relation whatsoever to [http://purplelemon.homestead.com/files/decatpics.html 'Purple Lemon'], but more power to him (or her). [http://purplelemon.homestead.com/files/destalk.jpg This Elfman pic just kills me].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I first heard about furries from the infamous [[MTV]] 'Sex2K' episode. I didn't think about it much afterward until some [[wikipedia:unencyclopedia|unencyclopedia]] article lead me to look-up [[Pressed Fur]] website. I looked through that and then eventually stumbled onto here. I recently looked over some of the latest [http://www.hartfordadvocate.com/article.cfm?aid=3873 news] [http://www.memphisflyer.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A10121 articles]. So, it's [[wikipedia:Confirmation_bias|only just now sunk in]] that furries are not... [[stereotype|well, you know]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I once tried to set up a [http://en.wikipedia.org/ Wikipedia] account as [[wikipedia:User:Revolutionaryluddite|'Revolutionaryluddite']] only to [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Missing_Wikipedians#R|give up] a few months afterward. I recieved a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Barnstars|barnstar] for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&amp;amp;limit=500&amp;amp;target=Revolutionaryluddite my contributions], and I was also threatened with banning a couple times. I still make some sporadic edits now and then-- most of them [[Wikipedia:hard rock|music]] related. The internet's other [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=revolutionaryluddite 'Revolutionaryluddite'] is also me. Make of my eclectic taste in music what you will. [[User:24.32.208.58]] is me as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Name ===&lt;br /&gt;
My [[real life]] name is already being used by a prominent furry ([[User_talk:Boingo|Guess who?]] I'll give you a hint, there's more than one vowel in it). After deciding to create a username based on one of my favorite [[Wikipedia:rock band|bands]], I considered [[wikipedia:Cheap_Trick|Trixie]], [[wikipedia:Ramones|Ramone]], [[wikipedia:Iggy_Pop|Iggy]], [[wikipedia:Thin_Lizzy|Lizzy]], [[wikipedia:Tom_Scholz|Scholz]], [[wikipedia:Def_Leppard|Leppard]], [[wikipedia:Gary_Numan|Numan]], and [[wikipedia:black_crowes|Crowe]]. I picked this because it just sounds/looks good. I suppose that this would make a sweet [[fursona]] name-- [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=boingo+furry it still looks open]-- if I could think of a first name to go with it. Maybe 'Timmy' or 'Johnny' or something [[species]]-specific like '[[Kit]]' or '[[Todd]]'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== About me ===&lt;br /&gt;
When it comes to editing, I like links, single quotes, parenthesis, and citations with multiple links in them (oooh... delicious) and I tend to make a copious amount of spelling and grammar errors (How many can you spot on this page alone?). I wrote a long explanation of my personal beliefs/background/hobbies/whatever on my Wikipedia account for transparency's sake. That was deleted when that account was deleted. Two things that I feel like repeating:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My family is split between [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_American English] [[wikipedia:Fundamentalist_Christianity|Fundamentalist]] [[wikipedia:Lutheran|Lutherans]] (mother's side) and [[wikipedia:Irish_American|Irish]] [[wikipedia:Roman_Catholic_Church|Catholics]] (father's side). Most of them are [[wikipedia:United_States_Democratic_Party|Democrats]]. I self-identify as a [[wikipedia:Evangelicalism|'catholic evangelical']] or [[wikipedia:Evangelical_catholic|'evangelical catholic']].&lt;br /&gt;
*I used to believe in the [[Wikipedia:rapture|rapture]], [[Wikipedia:reparative therapy|reparative therapy]] for [[homosexuals]], and [[Wikipedia:intelligent design|intelligent design]]. I don't anymore, but I'm rather sensitive about it in spite of everything.&lt;br /&gt;
* I used to be a [[wikipedia:Robert_P._Casey|Bob Casey Democrat]] until I jumped ship in fall 2004. I [[wikipedia:Opposition_to_the_2003_Iraq_War#Religious_opposition|strongly opposed the initial invasion of Iraq]], however, I support the [[wikipedia:Iraq_War_troop_surge_of_2007|'surge']] and our continual deployment in the region (See [[wikipedia:Anthony_Zinni|Anthony Zinni]]). Politically, I call myself a [[wikipedia:consistent_life_ethic|'consistent life ethicist']] or a [[wikipedia:One_Nation_Conservative|'one nation conservative']].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's about it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FAQ ===&lt;br /&gt;
'''Revolutionaryluddite'?''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's a reference to the late and great cultural critic [[wikipedia:Neil_Postman|Neil Postman]]. As he has [http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/cyberspace/cyberspace_7-25.html pointed out],&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;If people are getting divorced and mistreating their children and their sexism and racism are blights on our social life, none of that has anything to do with inadequate information. Now, along comes cyberspace and the information superhighway, and everyone seems to have the idea that, ah, here we can do it; if only we can have more access to more information faster and in more diverse forms at long last, we'll be able to solve these problems.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/User:Boingo</id>
		<title>User:Boingo</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/User:Boingo"/>
				<updated>2008-01-03T05:59:36Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''This user is a [[Wikipedia:newbie|newbie]] to the [[furry fandom]]. He might lead to considerable [[Wikipedia:lol|lulz]]. [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:BITE|Be gentle]].''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;This is my private bed &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is where I lie at night &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Staring at a light bulb hanging on the ceiling &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waiting for a dream to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
come and get me out of here&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here in my humble room at night&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I often wonder what goes on out there&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
What makes them run so scared &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I often stare at the people passing by &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But they can't see me through my window shades&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Just like I'm not even there&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I know my problems aren't your fault &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I really want to know &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has it always been this way&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If you can find me&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Come and get me out of here&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- ''[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZJHgZX1yQk&amp;amp;NR=1 Private Life]'' by [[wikipedia:Oingo_Boingo|Oingo Boingo]] (of [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=universalmusicgroup Universal Media Group]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Info==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Status ===&lt;br /&gt;
I'm in the process of developing a [[fursona]]. He'll be [[fox|something like]] [[Kendricks]] only darker, scruffier, and not a bit- '''not a bit'''- toony. A significant handicap is my complete lack of [[furry art|any artistic skills]] whatsoever. I don't have a [[LiveJournal]], but I'm considering getting one. I would really, really, really like to attend a [[furry convention]] but I have a particulary mild [[wikipedia:Agoraphobia|agoraphobia]] that is just annoying in everyday life and might be a serious issue (or might not).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first furry materials I read were [[Immelmann]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Concession]]'' and [[Jay Naylor]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Better Days]]''. I consider both of them to be relatively disturbing. In retrospect, I should have anticipated that. I'm currently reading [[Eric W. Schwartz]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Sabrina Online]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm someone of no particular importance (although I did pretty well on the [[Wikipedia:ACT (examination)|ACT]]) who likes [[Wikipedia:wiki|wiki]] editing (don't ask me why). I have no relation whatsoever to [http://purplelemon.homestead.com/files/decatpics.html 'Purple Lemon'], but more power to him (or her). [http://purplelemon.homestead.com/files/destalk.jpg This Elfman pic just kills me].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I first heard about furries from the infamous [[MTV]] 'Sex2K' episode. I didn't think about it much afterward until some [[wikipedia:unencyclopedia|unencyclopedia]] article lead me to look-up [[Pressed Fur]] website. I looked through that and then eventually stumbled onto here. I recently looked over some of the latest [http://www.hartfordadvocate.com/article.cfm?aid=3873 news] [http://www.memphisflyer.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A10121 articles]. So, it's [[wikipedia:Confirmation_bias|only just now sunk in]] that furries are not... [[stereotype|well, you know]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I once tried to set up a [http://en.wikipedia.org/ Wikipedia] account as [[wikipedia:User:Revolutionaryluddite|'Revolutionaryluddite']] only to [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Missing_Wikipedians#R|give up] a few months afterward. I recieved a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Barnstars|barnstar] for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&amp;amp;limit=500&amp;amp;target=Revolutionaryluddite my contributions], and I was also threatened with banning a couple times. I still make some sporadic edits now and then-- most of them [[Wikipedia:hard rock|music]] related. The internet's other [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=revolutionaryluddite 'Revolutionaryluddite'] is also me. Make of my eclectic taste in music what you will. [[User:24.32.208.58]] is me as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Name ===&lt;br /&gt;
My [[real life]] name is already being used by a prominent furry ([[User_talk:Boingo|Guess who?]] I'll give you a hint, there's more than one vowel in it). After deciding to create a username based on one of my favorite [[Wikipedia:rock band|bands]], I considered [[wikipedia:Cheap_Trick|Trixie]], [[wikipedia:Ramones|Ramone]], [[wikipedia:Iggy_Pop|Iggy]], [[wikipedia:Thin_Lizzy|Lizzy]], [[wikipedia:Tom_Scholz|Scholz]], [[wikipedia:Def_Leppard|Leppard]], [[wikipedia:Gary_Numan|Numan]], and [[wikipedia:black_crowes|Crowe]]. I picked this because it just sounds/looks good. I suppose that this would make a sweet [[fursona]] name-- [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=boingo+furry it still looks open]-- if I could think of a first name to go with it. Maybe 'Timmy' or 'Johnny' or something [[species]]-specific like '[[Kit]]' or '[[Todd]]'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== About me ===&lt;br /&gt;
When it comes to editing, I like links, single quotes, parenthesis, and citations with multiple links in them (oooh... delicious) and I tend to make a copious amount of spelling and grammar errors (How many can you spot on this page alone?). I wrote a long explanation of my personal beliefs/background/hobbies/whatever on my Wikipedia account for transparency's sake. That was deleted when that account was deleted. Two things that I feel like repeating:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My family is split between [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_American English] [[wikipedia:Fundamentalist_Christianity|Fundamentalist]] [[wikipedia:Lutheran|Lutherans]] (mother's side) and [[wikipedia:Irish_American|Irish]] [[wikipedia:Roman_Catholic_Church|Catholics]] (father's side). Most of them are [[wikipedia:United_States_Democratic_Party|Democrats]]. I self-identify as a [[wikipedia:Evangelicalism|'catholic evangelical']] or [[wikipedia:Evangelical_catholic|'evangelical catholic']].&lt;br /&gt;
*I used to believe in the [[Wikipedia:rapture|rapture]], [[Wikipedia:reparative therapy|reparative therapy]] for [[homosexuals]], and [[Wikipedia:intelligent design|intelligent design]]. I don't anymore, but I'm rather sensitive about it in spite of everything.&lt;br /&gt;
* I used to be a [[wikipedia:Robert_P._Casey|Bob Casey Democrat]] until I jumped ship in fall 2004. I [[wikipedia:Opposition_to_the_2003_Iraq_War#Religious_opposition|strongly opposed the initial invasion of Iraq]], however, I support the [[wikipedia:Iraq_War_troop_surge_of_2007|'surge']] and our continual deployment in the region (See [[wikipedia:Anthony_Zinni|Anthony Zinni]]). Politically, I call myself a [[wikipedia:consistent_life_ethic|'consistent life ethicist']] or a [[wikipedia:One_Nation_Conservative|'one nation conservative']].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's about it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FAQ ===&lt;br /&gt;
'''Revolutionaryluddite'?''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's a reference to the late and great cultural critic [[wikipedia:Neil_Postman|Neil Postman]]. As he has [http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/cyberspace/cyberspace_7-25.html pointed out],&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;If people are getting divorced and mistreating their children and their sexism and racism are blights on our social life, none of that has anything to do with inadequate information. Now, along comes cyberspace and the information superhighway, and everyone seems to have the idea that, ah, here we can do it; if only we can have more access to more information faster and in more diverse forms at long last, we'll be able to solve these problems.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/User:Boingo</id>
		<title>User:Boingo</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/User:Boingo"/>
				<updated>2008-01-03T05:26:32Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* Status */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;quot;This is my private bed &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is where I lie at night &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Staring at a light bulb hanging on the ceiling &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waiting for a dream to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
come and get me out of here&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here in my humble room at night&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I often wonder what goes on out there&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
What makes them run so scared &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I often stare at the people passing by &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But they can't see me through my window shades&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Just like I'm not even there&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I know my problems aren't your fault &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I really want to know &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has it always been this way&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If you can find me&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Come and get me out of here&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- ''[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZJHgZX1yQk&amp;amp;NR=1 Private Life]'' by [[wikipedia:Oingo_Boingo|Oingo Boingo]] (of [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=universalmusicgroup Universal Media Group]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Info==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Status ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first furry materials I read were [[Immelmann]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Concession]]'' and [[Jay Naylor]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Better Days]]''. I consider both of them to be relatively disturbing. In retrospect, I should have anticipated that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm someone of no particular importance (although I did pretty well on the [[Wikipedia:ACT (examination)|ACT]]) who likes [[Wikipedia:wiki|wiki]] editing (don't ask me why). I have no relation whatsoever to [http://purplelemon.homestead.com/files/decatpics.html 'Purple Lemon'], but more power to him (or her). [http://purplelemon.homestead.com/files/destalk.jpg This Elfman pic just kills me].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I first heard about furries from the infamous [[MTV]] 'Sex2K' episode. I didn't think about it much afterward until some [[wikipedia:unencyclopedia|unencyclopedia]] article lead me to look-up [[Pressed Fur]] website. I looked through that and then eventually stumbled onto here. I recently looked over some of the latest [http://www.hartfordadvocate.com/article.cfm?aid=3873 news] [http://www.memphisflyer.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A10121 articles]. So, it's [[wikipedia:Confirmation_bias|only just now sunk in]] that furries are not... [[stereotype|well, you know]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I once tried to set up a [http://en.wikipedia.org/ Wikipedia] account as [[wikipedia:User:Revolutionaryluddite|'Revolutionaryluddite']] only to [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Missing_Wikipedians#R|give up] a few months afterward. I recieved a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Barnstars|barnstar] for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&amp;amp;limit=500&amp;amp;target=Revolutionaryluddite my contributions], and I was also threatened with banning a couple times. I still make some sporadic edits now and then-- most of them [[Wikipedia:hard rock|music]] related. The internet's other [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=revolutionaryluddite 'Revolutionaryluddite'] is also me. Make of my eclectic taste in music what you will. [[User:24.32.208.58]] is me as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Name ===&lt;br /&gt;
My [[real life]] name is already being used by a prominent furry ([[User_talk:Boingo|Guess who?]] I'll give you a hint, there's more than one vowel in it). After deciding to create a username based on one of my favorite [[Wikipedia:rock band|bands]], I considered [[wikipedia:Cheap_Trick|Trixie]], [[wikipedia:Ramones|Ramone]], [[wikipedia:Iggy_Pop|Iggy]], [[wikipedia:Thin_Lizzy|Lizzy]], [[wikipedia:Tom_Scholz|Scholz]], [[wikipedia:Def_Leppard|Leppard]], [[wikipedia:Gary_Numan|Numan]], and [[wikipedia:black_crowes|Crowe]]. I picked this because it just sounds/looks good. I suppose that this would make a sweet [[fursona]] name-- [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=boingo+furry it still looks open]-- if I could think of a first name to go with it. Maybe 'Timmy' or 'Johnny' or something [[species]]-specific like '[[Kit]]' or '[[Todd]]'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== About me ===&lt;br /&gt;
When it comes to editing, I like links, single quotes, parenthesis, and citations with multiple links in them (oooh... delicious) and I tend to make a copious amount of spelling and grammar errors (How many can you spot on this page alone?). I wrote a long explanation of my personal beliefs/background/hobbies/whatever on my Wikipedia account for transparency's sake. That was deleted when that account was deleted. Two things that I feel like repeating:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My family is split between [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_American English] [[wikipedia:Fundamentalist_Christianity|Fundamentalist]] [[wikipedia:Lutheran|Lutherans]] (mother's side) and [[wikipedia:Irish_American|Irish]] [[wikipedia:Roman_Catholic_Church|Catholics]] (father's side). Most of them are [[wikipedia:United_States_Democratic_Party|Democrats]]. I self-identify as a [[wikipedia:Evangelicalism|'catholic evangelical']] or [[wikipedia:Evangelical_catholic|'evangelical catholic']].&lt;br /&gt;
*I used to believe in the [[Wikipedia:rapture|rapture]], [[Wikipedia:reparative therapy|reparative therapy]] for [[homosexuals]], and [[Wikipedia:intelligent design|intelligent design]]. I don't anymore, but I'm rather sensitive about it in spite of everything.&lt;br /&gt;
* I used to be a [[wikipedia:Robert_P._Casey|Bob Casey Democrat]] until I jumped ship in fall 2004. I [[wikipedia:Opposition_to_the_2003_Iraq_War#Religious_opposition|strongly opposed the initial invasion of Iraq]], however, I support the [[wikipedia:Iraq_War_troop_surge_of_2007|'surge']] and our continual deployment in the region (See [[wikipedia:Anthony_Zinni|Anthony Zinni]]). Politically, I call myself a [[wikipedia:consistent_life_ethic|'consistent life ethicist']] or a [[wikipedia:One_Nation_Conservative|'one nation conservative']].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's about it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FAQ ===&lt;br /&gt;
'''Revolutionaryluddite'?''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's a reference to the late and great cultural critic [[wikipedia:Neil_Postman|Neil Postman]]. As he has [http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/cyberspace/cyberspace_7-25.html pointed out],&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;If people are getting divorced and mistreating their children and their sexism and racism are blights on our social life, none of that has anything to do with inadequate information. Now, along comes cyberspace and the information superhighway, and everyone seems to have the idea that, ah, here we can do it; if only we can have more access to more information faster and in more diverse forms at long last, we'll be able to solve these problems.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/User:Boingo</id>
		<title>User:Boingo</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/User:Boingo"/>
				<updated>2008-01-03T02:39:27Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;quot;This is my private bed &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is where I lie at night &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Staring at a light bulb hanging on the ceiling &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waiting for a dream to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
come and get me out of here&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here in my humble room at night&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I often wonder what goes on out there&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
What makes them run so scared &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I often stare at the people passing by &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But they can't see me through my window shades&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Just like I'm not even there&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I know my problems aren't your fault &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I really want to know &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has it always been this way&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If you can find me&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Come and get me out of here&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- ''[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZJHgZX1yQk&amp;amp;NR=1 Private Life]'' by [[wikipedia:Oingo_Boingo|Oingo Boingo]] (of [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=universalmusicgroup Universal Media Group]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Info==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Status ===&lt;br /&gt;
The only furry materials I have read so far is [[Immelmann]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Concession]]'' and [[Jay Naylor]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Better Days]]''. I consider both of them to be relatively disturbing. In retrospect, I should have anticipated that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm someone of no particular importance (although I did pretty well on the [[Wikipedia:ACT (examination)|ACT]]) who likes [[Wikipedia:wiki|wiki]] editing (don't ask me why). I have no relation whatsoever to [http://purplelemon.homestead.com/files/decatpics.html 'Purple Lemon'], but more power to him (or her). [http://purplelemon.homestead.com/files/destalk.jpg This Elfman pic just kills me].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I first heard about furries from the infamous [[MTV]] 'Sex2K' episode. I didn't think about it much afterward until some [[wikipedia:unencyclopedia|unencyclopedia]] article lead me to look-up [[Pressed Fur]] website. I looked through that and then eventually stumbled onto here. I recently looked over some of the latest [http://www.hartfordadvocate.com/article.cfm?aid=3873 news] [http://www.memphisflyer.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A10121 articles]. So, it's [[wikipedia:Confirmation_bias|only just now sunk in]] that furries are not... [[stereotype|well, you know]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I once tried to set up a [http://en.wikipedia.org/ Wikipedia] account as [[wikipedia:User:Revolutionaryluddite|'Revolutionaryluddite']] only to [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Missing_Wikipedians#R|give up] a few months afterward. I recieved a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Barnstars|barnstar] for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&amp;amp;limit=500&amp;amp;target=Revolutionaryluddite my contributions], and I was also threatened with banning a couple times. I still make some sporadic edits now and then-- most of them [[Wikipedia:hard rock|music]] related. The internet's other [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=revolutionaryluddite 'Revolutionaryluddite'] is also me. Make of my eclectic taste in music what you will. [[User:24.32.208.58]] is me as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Name ===&lt;br /&gt;
My [[real life]] name is already being used by a prominent furry ([[User_talk:Boingo|Guess who?]] I'll give you a hint, there's more than one vowel in it). After deciding to create a username based on one of my favorite [[Wikipedia:rock band|bands]], I considered [[wikipedia:Cheap_Trick|Trixie]], [[wikipedia:Ramones|Ramone]], [[wikipedia:Iggy_Pop|Iggy]], [[wikipedia:Thin_Lizzy|Lizzy]], [[wikipedia:Tom_Scholz|Scholz]], [[wikipedia:Def_Leppard|Leppard]], [[wikipedia:Gary_Numan|Numan]], and [[wikipedia:black_crowes|Crowe]]. I picked this because it just sounds/looks good. I suppose that this would make a sweet [[fursona]] name-- [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=boingo+furry it still looks open]-- if I could think of a first name to go with it. Maybe 'Timmy' or 'Johnny' or something [[species]]-specific like '[[Kit]]' or '[[Todd]]'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== About me ===&lt;br /&gt;
When it comes to editing, I like links, single quotes, parenthesis, and citations with multiple links in them (oooh... delicious) and I tend to make a copious amount of spelling and grammar errors (How many can you spot on this page alone?). I wrote a long explanation of my personal beliefs/background/hobbies/whatever on my Wikipedia account for transparency's sake. That was deleted when that account was deleted. Two things that I feel like repeating:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My family is split between [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_American English] [[wikipedia:Fundamentalist_Christianity|Fundamentalist]] [[wikipedia:Lutheran|Lutherans]] (mother's side) and [[wikipedia:Irish_American|Irish]] [[wikipedia:Roman_Catholic_Church|Catholics]] (father's side). Most of them are [[wikipedia:United_States_Democratic_Party|Democrats]]. I self-identify as a [[wikipedia:Evangelicalism|'catholic evangelical']] or [[wikipedia:Evangelical_catholic|'evangelical catholic']].&lt;br /&gt;
*I used to believe in the [[Wikipedia:rapture|rapture]], [[Wikipedia:reparative therapy|reparative therapy]] for [[homosexuals]], and [[Wikipedia:intelligent design|intelligent design]]. I don't anymore, but I'm rather sensitive about it in spite of everything.&lt;br /&gt;
* I used to be a [[wikipedia:Robert_P._Casey|Bob Casey Democrat]] until I jumped ship in fall 2004. I [[wikipedia:Opposition_to_the_2003_Iraq_War#Religious_opposition|strongly opposed the initial invasion of Iraq]], however, I support the [[wikipedia:Iraq_War_troop_surge_of_2007|'surge']] and our continual deployment in the region (See [[wikipedia:Anthony_Zinni|Anthony Zinni]]). Politically, I call myself a [[wikipedia:consistent_life_ethic|'consistent life ethicist']] or a [[wikipedia:One_Nation_Conservative|'one nation conservative']].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's about it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FAQ ===&lt;br /&gt;
'''Revolutionaryluddite'?''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's a reference to the late and great cultural critic [[wikipedia:Neil_Postman|Neil Postman]]. As he has [http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/cyberspace/cyberspace_7-25.html pointed out],&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;If people are getting divorced and mistreating their children and their sexism and racism are blights on our social life, none of that has anything to do with inadequate information. Now, along comes cyberspace and the information superhighway, and everyone seems to have the idea that, ah, here we can do it; if only we can have more access to more information faster and in more diverse forms at long last, we'll be able to solve these problems.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Character_sheet</id>
		<title>Character sheet</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Character_sheet"/>
				<updated>2008-01-03T02:22:40Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* Sheet breakdown */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''character sheet''', also known as a '''char sheet''' or '''reference sheet''', is an artifact common to nearly all published ('table-top' or 'paper-and-pencil') [[roleplaying]] games (e.g., [[Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons]], [[Werewolf: The Apocalypse]], [[Wikipedia:GURPS|GURPS]], [[Ironclaw]]), to record vital information about a primary [[character]] being played and portrayed by a player. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mostly, this information is specific to the published game in question, but also includes name biographical information, possessions, and sometimes a character sketch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Character sheet and furry ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because of this usage and a similarly named concept in art and graphics design (see character model sheet, below) the concept and term has been inconsistently adopted by many furry roleplayers as a written record of a [[furry]] being or character (without reference to any specific published game), mostly used for roleplaying, although they can also be used to describe a user's [[fursona]], or even a character in any kind of written media.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sheet breakdown ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bioclrtextmore.jpg|right|thumb|210px|Example of a character sheet]]&lt;br /&gt;
Furry character sheets typically includes the user/character's name, age, [[species]], gender, height, weight, appearance, personality, and traits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some have more detailed information added, including [[sexual preference]], nicknames, martial status, [[fetish]]es, items, and biography, and a snapshot or image of the character may also be included.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Example ==== &lt;br /&gt;
*Name: Peter Wolfowitz&lt;br /&gt;
*Age: 23&lt;br /&gt;
*Species: [[Wolf]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Gender: [[Male]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Height: 6'0''&lt;br /&gt;
*Weight: 120 lbs.&lt;br /&gt;
*Appearance: A slender [[anthropomorphic]] wolf with black [[fur]] and acid-yellow eyes&lt;br /&gt;
*Personality: Calm and collected&lt;br /&gt;
*Traits: Skilled in the making of arts and crafts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Character model sheet ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:ZZmodelsheet.png|right|thumb|275px|Example of a model sheet]] &lt;br /&gt;
A '''character model sheet''', also known simply as a '''model sheet''', is a graphical version of the &amp;quot;character sheet&amp;quot; (it's to be noted that outside the [[furry fandom]], specially in animation, cartooning and graphic design, model sheets and character sheets are basically two variations of the same term.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All thought not a furry coined term (having being first conceived and used in mainstream [[Wikipedia:Animation|animation]],) it's often used by [[furry artist]]s and fans to graphically describe a character, fursonas, or even [[fursuit]]s. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It displays a specific turnaround view and look on the particular features of a character, such as head and body shape, hair and tail length and style, size and position of the eyes, mouth, [[ears]], fur patterns and design, etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Color callouts and character (sheet) descriptions may be added to, or accompany the model sheet &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Model sheet|Model sheet]] on [[Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Terms]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Sexual_orientation</id>
		<title>Talk:Sexual orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Sexual_orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-03T02:20:17Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* Gay-&amp;gt;Sexual preference? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Sorry, that last edit was me.  --Brody&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Incorrect data==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just added all of the percentages together on the Kinsey scale chart because I was thinking about making a cumulative frequency table for it or something, but I found that the percentages only add up to 97% when they should add up to 100%, so could we correct this please? Thanks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
| Kinsey rank&lt;br /&gt;
| Percentage&lt;br /&gt;
| Cumulative freq.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| 12&lt;br /&gt;
| 12&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| 18&lt;br /&gt;
| 30&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| 18&lt;br /&gt;
| 48&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| 14&lt;br /&gt;
| 62&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4&lt;br /&gt;
| 11&lt;br /&gt;
| 73&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5&lt;br /&gt;
| 16&lt;br /&gt;
| 89&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6&lt;br /&gt;
| 8&lt;br /&gt;
| 97&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Total:&lt;br /&gt;
| 97%&lt;br /&gt;
| 97%&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Shia|Shia]] 17:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's just because they've been rounded down (like 12.9 -&amp;gt; 12). I'll add in the decimal points. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:04, 29 May 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FAOD Poll ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is a web-poll with 44 responses statistically solid?  Granted it's always difficult to get well-sampled and unbiased results about highly personal topics, but with fewer than a hundred or so responses and the fact that polls within a community tend to be unavoidably self-selecting there's so much potential bias in either direction that they could arguably be considered anecdotal. --[[User:Riismo|Riismo]] 22:21, 5 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some observations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are a few observations and speculations I've made regarding homosexuality in furry fandom.  Feel free to mull over these and offer any suggestions on whether you think they're accurate or not, and if so, whether they should be incorporated into the article (I am using the term &amp;quot;gays&amp;quot; throughout to represent both genders):&lt;br /&gt;
*The polls quoted here, and at least one other I'm aware of, suggest that the proportion of gays in furry fandom is approximately three times the proportion of gays in the general population;&lt;br /&gt;
*If that figure seems low, I can think of a few reasons why it might seem to be much higher:&lt;br /&gt;
**Gays are much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow furry fans than they are in other areas of their life, such as school and the workplace.  Statistically it may be true that 5-10% of the people at my workplace are gay, but I seldom find out who they are.  The proportion of gays among furries may only be 3x what it is in my workplace, but the proportion of gays ''that I know about'' is far greater;&lt;br /&gt;
**Having a non-furry S.O. and having children (whether natural, adopted, or foster) are two factors that often result in a fan having less time and money to devote to things furry, and having to limit one's involvement due to other priorities.  Gays are more likely than straight folk to have an S.O. who is also a furry fan, and are less likely than straight folk to be raising children  (Granted, every individual's situation is different, but averaged over a large number of people I would be surprised if this is not the case);&lt;br /&gt;
*Gays already have to deal with the idea that one major area of their lives goes against what is considered normal by a large segment of society.  As such, the idea of having an interest that some would consider unusual or weird is not as big a leap as it is for someone who hasn't been down that road;&lt;br /&gt;
*How much greater is the awareness of the existence of furry fandom among gays compared to straights?  I honestly don't know, but if more people among any demographic (such as gays) knows of the existence of furry fandom, it follows that more people from among that group would become furry fans.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 20:05, 10 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some thoughts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Wouldn't it be nice if the table had each row color-coded? With the top one a certain solid color, the bottom one another solid color, and the middle row a blend of the two? I suggest a red-blue or a yellow-blue pattern.* I have no idea how to do this, but the syntax might be on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Table#Examples this wiki help page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Dr.Kinsey's ''Sexual Behavior in the Human Male'' found that &amp;quot;46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or &amp;quot;reacted to&amp;quot; persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives&amp;quot;. In addition, &amp;quot;Kinsey said in both the Male and Female volumes that it was impossible to determine the number of persons who are &amp;quot;homosexual&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;heterosexual&amp;quot;. It was only possible to determine behavior at any given time&amp;quot;- &amp;quot;10% of males in the sample were predominantly homosexual between the ages of 16 and 55&amp;quot;. See [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Am I arguing that furry fandom is represenative of the general population? No. However, I think that the article really needs some necessary context. In the world [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAH_mjLhreE that most people live in], someone with the genetic background/social background of a 1/2, 1, 2, or a 2 1/2- et cetera- would probably self-identify as 'straight' throughout their life. The same might not be true for furries.** &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; One could argue that the color red signifies 'bad' or the color yellow signifies 'sickly'. I don't know. It's just a suggestion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;**&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; I say &amp;quot;might&amp;quot; because, well, how would [[mundane|I]] know?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 05:13, 26 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gay-&amp;gt;Sexual preference? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This use to be the [[Gay]] article (?.) Why try to overwrite the original entry with another subject instead of starting a new one (&amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot;,) and migrate the pertinent (&amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot;) data to it?. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, you got an article with several subjects/ideas/opinions trying to make a (several) point(s) while making none (i.e &amp;quot;''the term 'sexual preference' is more broad and includes personal attitudes in between the '''three''' general categories defined as sexual orientations,...''&amp;quot; Three, but the following paragraph now lists five,)...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article seems to be in a dire need of a top to bottom cleanup/revamp =P [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 01:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:...And, why so many redirects for a single article? ¬_¬ [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 01:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I merged 'heterosexual' and 'bisexual' into 'homosexual' since the two articles were one-/two-sentences stubs with little hope of future content. None of the information that was in the original 'homosexual' article has been removed. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 01:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't see what specifically needs to be cleaned-up besides the lead paragraph, which I fiddled with a little bit. What sections need revising? [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 02:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Why not have a lot of redirects? The words being re-directed- Sexual orientation, Sexual orientations, Sexual Preferences, homosexuals, homosexuality, gay, gays, et cetera- all fall clearly under this article. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 02:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I edited the lead section so it is now structured more simply and more logically. It mentions the three orientations, then it describes those three orientations, then it describes the term 'gay'- which has three different meanings-, and then it describes the rare exception to all orientations. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 02:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation</id>
		<title>Sexual orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-03T02:18:09Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{cleanup}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{context}}&lt;br /&gt;
''This page is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Orphan orphaned] since few other WikiFur articles link to it. [http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/WikiFur:About You can help!]'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gay_flag.png|right|thumb|150px|The rainbow flag associated with [[wikipedia:homosexuality|homosexuality]] in and out of the [[furry fandom|fandom]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sexual preference''' describes the gender or genders that someone feels sexually attracted to. The term [[wikipedia:Sexual_orientation|'''sexual orientation''']] is often used interchangably, but the term 'sexual preference' is more broad and includes personal attitudes in between the three general categories defined as [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientations]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Wikipedia:Heterosexuality|'''Heterosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the opposite gender. [[Wikipedia:Bisexuality|'''Bisexuality''']] is the sexual attraction to members of both sexes, [[male]] and [[female]]. [[wikipedia:homosexuality|'''Homosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the same gender.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term '''gay''' has three different meanings. First, it is occasionally used synonymously with '''homosexual'''. Second, and most oftenly, it is used to refer specifically to [[male|male/male]] attraction while the term '''[[Wikipedia:lesbian|lesbian]]''' refers to [[female|female/female]] attraction. Third, '''gay''' is sometimes used to refer to both homosexuals and bisexuals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, a very small, atypical minority of individuals do not express attraction to either gender and are considered '''[[Wikipedia:asexual|asexual]]'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sexual preferences within the [[furry fandom]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[non-furry|Non-furries]] generally take the position that a significantly larger proportion of the [[furry fandom]] is gay or bisexual compared to the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; A lack of completely reliable survey data exists within both the fandom&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The studies that have been done suggest that this is true, though not to the large extent that is often suggested.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Furries have suggested various theories for this. A lack of completely reliable survey data exists within both the fandom&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Categorization==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current [[Wikipedia:scientific consensus|scientific consensus]] advocated by various social and educational organizations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;such as the [[Wikipedia:American Psychiatric Association|American Psychiatric Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Psychological Association|American Psychological Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Counseling Association|American Counseling Association]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of Social Workers|National Association of Social Workers]], the [[Wikipedia:American Academy of Pediatrics|American Academy of Pediatrics]], the [[Wikipedia:American Association of School Administrators|American Association of School Administrators]], the [[Wikipedia:American Federation of Teachers|American Federation of Teachers]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of School Psychologists|National Association of School Psychologists]], and the [[Wikipedia:National Education Association|National Education Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is that people develop their own permanent, unchangeable [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientation]] within one of the three categories in their [[Wikipedia:childhood|early childhood]] as [[Wikipedia:Biology and sexual orientation|a combination of genetic tendencies and their social environment]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/publications/justthefacts.html Just the Facts About Sexual Orientation &amp;amp; Youth: A Primer for Principals, Educators and School Personnel] 1999, American Psychological Association&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minority of researchers, sometimes known as [[Wikipedia:Queer theory|'queer theorists']], believe that the concept of sexual orientations is a [[Wikipedia:social construct|social construct]] and that people naturally exhibit a variety of attractions. Some furries also subscribe to this view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pressedfur.coolfreepages.com/essay/postvixen/index.html &amp;quot;Sitting On the Third Side of the Fence&amp;quot;] by Hannah Kincaid from [[Pressed Fur]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although he did not advocate the social construct theory, [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey]] stated that &amp;quot;[[Males]] do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual... The living world is a continuum in each and every one of its aspects.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-hhscale.html &amp;quot;Kinsey's Heterosexual-Homosexual Rating Scale&amp;quot;] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He postulated a [[Wikipedia:Kinsey Scale|scale]] of sexual preferences from zero to six, zero being exclusively heterosexual.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social attitudes among furries==&lt;br /&gt;
''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], found that &amp;quot;race, religion and sexual orientation (as divisive factors) are simply too minor to attract any real attention&amp;quot; and that furries have &amp;quot;higher tolerance for variety in sexual orientation and activity&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A small yet significant minority of furries self-identify as [[Christian furs|Christian]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Some of them believe in the [[Wikipedia:the bible and homosexuality|traditional Christian view]] that homosexual conduct is immoral and that homosexuals should be [[Wikipedia:celibacy|celibate]]. Other [[Christian furs]] believe that the Bible verses and [[Wikipedia:sacred tradition|sacred traditions]] cited against homosexuality are misinterpreted.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark The furries of 'Rainbow Ark'] [http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark/profile take this view]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Both sides maintain a cordial relationship with each other and try to promote mutual understanding.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; [http://www.gaychristian.net/greatdebate.php This website] summarizes the arguments in the debate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===General surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimates of the incidence of homosexuality in the general population vary greatly, due in part to the lack of reliable survey data and the difficulty in defining [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_orientation sexual orientations].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Retrieved September 28th, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey's]] work ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male|Sexual Behavior in the Human Male]]'' found that &amp;quot;46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or &amp;quot;reacted to&amp;quot; persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives&amp;quot;. In addition, the book stated that &amp;quot;10% of males in the sample were predominantly homosexual between the ages of 16 and 55&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html Research Summary] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Kinsey's book, and its companion ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Female|Sexual Behavior in the Human Female]]'', have received [[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male#Criticism|vocal criticism]] for their findings and methodology.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/reisman.html &amp;quot;Kinsey and the Homosexual Revolution&amp;quot;] by [[Wikipedia: Judith Reisman|Dr. Judith Reisman]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.swlearning.com/quant/kohler/stat/biographical_sketches/bio15.1.html Biography of Statician] [[Wikipedia:John Tukey|John W. Tukey]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:American conservative|American conservative]] [[Wikipedia:magazine|magazine]] ''[[Wikipedia:Human Events|Human Events]]'' calls the Kinsey Report the fourth [http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=7591 Most Harmful Book of the 19th and 20th Centuries].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Catholic Church|Roman Catholic]] [[Wikipedia:Higher education in the United States|educational association]] '''[[Wikipedia:Intercollegiate Studies Institute|The Intercollegiate Studies Institute]]''' called it [http://www.mmisi.org/ir/35_01/50worst.pdf &amp;quot;A pervert's attempt to demonstrate that perversion is &amp;quot;statistically&amp;quot;normal&amp;quot;] and the third &amp;quot;Worst Book of the Century&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''[[Wikipedia:The New York Times|The New York Times]]'' called his research &amp;quot;conscientious and comprehensive&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pomeroy, Wardell (1972). Dr. Kinsey and the Institute for Sex Research. New York: Harper &amp;amp; Row.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Professor [[Wikipedia:Martin Duberman|Martin Duberman]] called it &amp;quot;skillful&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;a monumental endeavor&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/publications/duberman.html Book review of] '''[http://www.amazon.com/Alfred-C-Kinsey-Public-Private/dp/0393040860 Alfred C. Kinsey : A Public/Private Life]''' originally published in ''[[Wikipedia:The Nation|The Nation]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several recent surveys done in [[Wikipedia:Western world|Western countries]] such as [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]], [[Wikipedia:Australia|Australia]], and the [[Wikipedia:United States|United States]] typically define between 1% and 10% of the general population, which an average around 5%, as homosexual or bisexual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Accessed December 31, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The British government conducted a country-wide survey in 2005 as part of the [[Wikipedia:Civil_Partnership_Act_2004|''Civil Partnership Act'']]. This study, the only official government study of its kind, stated that 6% of the [[Wikipedia:United Kingdom|United Kingdom]] would be interested in forming a [[Wikipedia:civil union|civil union]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nihe.gov.uk/publications/consultation_documents/Draft%20Policy%20Statement%20on%20SO%20Dec06.pdf Sexual Orientation Policy Statement Draft for Consultation] (pdf)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fandom surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are multiple estimates of the percentage of gays in the furry fandom. It is often thought within the fandom that the number is high, possibly as high as 90%,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; but polls have shown differences in estimation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A 2007 [[Wikipedia:University of California, Davis|University of California at Davis]] study found that 37.3% of respondents were bisexual, 32.7% heterosexual, 25.5% homosexual, and 8% were [[Wikipedia:questioning (sexuality)|uncertain]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://studyf3.livejournal.com/1383.html &amp;quot;Furry Survey Results&amp;quot;] from University of California, Davis: Department of Psychology. Published 2007-05-05. Accessed 2007-05-05.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll used in ''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], showed 25% heterosexual, 19% homosexual, and 48% bisexual out of 360 peopled polled.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Sociology of Furry Fandom]. Retrieved October 19, 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rust concluded that &amp;quot;Truth be told, there are many more homosexual members of the fandom than in general society.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll (of indeterminable date, but before 2005) on the [[IFPL]] used the [[Wikipedia:Kinsey scale|Kinsey scale]] to rate the measure of homosexuality in respondents:&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin: 1em 1em 1em 0; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px #aaa solid; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 95%;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #C6E3FF&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 12.9%&lt;br /&gt;
| (63/487)&lt;br /&gt;
| 0 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively heterosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #A7B1EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.3%&lt;br /&gt;
| (89/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 1 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CBABE2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.7%&lt;br /&gt;
| (91/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, more than incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CF71EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 14.8%&lt;br /&gt;
| (72/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| Equally heterosexual and homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #DF99D4&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 11.3% &lt;br /&gt;
| (55/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 4 &lt;br /&gt;
|Predominately homosexual, more than incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #F79FD1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 16.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (78/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 5 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately homosexual, incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #FFB1D8&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 8.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (39/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 6 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively homosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* A 2006 [http://faod.org/ FAOD] poll showed 25% heterosexual, 20% homosexual, and 55% bisexual (out of 44 polled)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://faod.org/index.php?topic=179.0 FAOD Message Board]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furtopia]] poll (open 2003 to present) stated that 53% were heterosexual, 15% gay, and 30% bisexual out of 862 people polled.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://cgi.furtopia.org/cgi-bin/ib311/ikonboard.cgi?s=411086f03c728556d957bd1ffd9b528a;act=ST;f=77;t=9074 Furtopia Message Board] Retrieved September 5, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furry_Survey|poll]] by [[Alex Osaki]] reported that 42.75% were heterosexual, 16.86% were homosexual, 35.29% were bisexual, and 4.71% self-identified as neither.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey.php Furry Poll Results] as of December 30, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Theories===&lt;br /&gt;
One viable theory involves [[Mark Merlino]], a former chair of [[ConFurence]] who co-founded the first furry [[conventions]]. [[Crush Yiff Destroy]] has suggested that Merlino actively recruited alternative lifestylers into the fandom, and that this influences furry demographics to this day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.crushyiffdestroy.com/show/merlino &amp;quot;Journey to the Center of Mark Merlino&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Furries also guess that, since having a [[non-furry]] significant other and raising children may result in a fan having less time and money to devote to the fandom, gays are over-represented because they are less likely to be raising children.{{fact}} Some speculate that the negative [[Wikipedia:social stigma|social stigma]] [[Wikipedia:Furry fandom#Media coverage|attached to the fandom]] keeps away heterosexual [[mundanes]] who would otherwise feel interested. David Rust has stated that &amp;quot;The social variations for Furries may seem unusual from a generic, American viewpoint. However, from the position of a group of people who are already predisposed to enjoying anthropomorphic animals, other concepts such as homosexuality... seem somewhat mundane and unimportant by comparison.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Others guess that gays are not over-represented, but that they are simply much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow fans than they are in other areas of their life.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
One other theory is that the demographics of the fandom is reasonably close to the general population. It just happens that people who become furries, a [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']] of sorts, become more exposed to alternate lifestyles and may reconsider their own sexuality, which might result in a paralell [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']].{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Relationship terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sociology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation</id>
		<title>Sexual orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-03T02:09:50Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{cleanup}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{context}}&lt;br /&gt;
''This page is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Orphan orphaned] since few other WikiFur articles link to it. [http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/WikiFur:About You can help!]'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gay_flag.png|right|thumb|150px|The rainbow flag associated with [[wikipedia:homosexuality|homosexuality]] in and out of the [[furry fandom|fandom]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sexual preference''' describes the gender or genders that someone feels sexually attracted to. The term [[wikipedia:Sexual_orientation|'''sexual orientation''']] is often used interchangably, but the term 'sexual preference' is more broad and includes personal attitudes in between the three general categories defined as [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientations]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Wikipedia:Heterosexuality|'''Heterosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the opposite gender. [[Wikipedia:Bisexuality|'''Bisexuality''']] is the sexual attraction to members of both sexes, [[male]] and [[female]]. [[wikipedia:homosexuality|'''Homosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the same gender.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Gay''' is often used synonymously with '''homosexual''', but the term '''gay''' usually refers to [[male|male/male]] relationships while the term '''[[Wikipedia:lesbian|lesbian]]''' refers to [[female|female/female]] relationships. '''Gay''' is sometimes used inaccurately to refer to both homosexuals and bisexuals. In addition, a small, atypical minority of individuals do not express attraction to either gender and are considered '''[[Wikipedia:asexual|asexual]]'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sexual preferences within the [[furry fandom]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[non-furry|Non-furries]] generally take the position that a significantly larger proportion of the [[furry fandom]] is gay or bisexual compared to the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; A lack of completely reliable survey data exists within both the fandom&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The studies that have been done suggest that this is true, though not to the large extent that is often suggested.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Furries have suggested various theories for this. A lack of completely reliable survey data exists within both the fandom&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Categorization==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current [[Wikipedia:scientific consensus|scientific consensus]] advocated by various social and educational organizations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;such as the [[Wikipedia:American Psychiatric Association|American Psychiatric Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Psychological Association|American Psychological Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Counseling Association|American Counseling Association]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of Social Workers|National Association of Social Workers]], the [[Wikipedia:American Academy of Pediatrics|American Academy of Pediatrics]], the [[Wikipedia:American Association of School Administrators|American Association of School Administrators]], the [[Wikipedia:American Federation of Teachers|American Federation of Teachers]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of School Psychologists|National Association of School Psychologists]], and the [[Wikipedia:National Education Association|National Education Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is that people develop their own permanent, unchangeable [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientation]] within one of the three categories in their [[Wikipedia:childhood|early childhood]] as [[Wikipedia:Biology and sexual orientation|a combination of genetic tendencies and their social environment]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/publications/justthefacts.html Just the Facts About Sexual Orientation &amp;amp; Youth: A Primer for Principals, Educators and School Personnel] 1999, American Psychological Association&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minority of researchers, sometimes known as [[Wikipedia:Queer theory|'queer theorists']], believe that the concept of sexual orientations is a [[Wikipedia:social construct|social construct]] and that people naturally exhibit a variety of attractions. Some furries also subscribe to this view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pressedfur.coolfreepages.com/essay/postvixen/index.html &amp;quot;Sitting On the Third Side of the Fence&amp;quot;] by Hannah Kincaid from [[Pressed Fur]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although he did not advocate the social construct theory, [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey]] stated that &amp;quot;[[Males]] do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual... The living world is a continuum in each and every one of its aspects.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-hhscale.html &amp;quot;Kinsey's Heterosexual-Homosexual Rating Scale&amp;quot;] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He postulated a [[Wikipedia:Kinsey Scale|scale]] of sexual preferences from zero to six, zero being exclusively heterosexual.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social attitudes among furries==&lt;br /&gt;
''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], found that &amp;quot;race, religion and sexual orientation (as divisive factors) are simply too minor to attract any real attention&amp;quot; and that furries have &amp;quot;higher tolerance for variety in sexual orientation and activity&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A small yet significant minority of furries self-identify as [[Christian furs|Christian]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Some of them believe in the [[Wikipedia:the bible and homosexuality|traditional Christian view]] that homosexual conduct is immoral and that homosexuals should be [[Wikipedia:celibacy|celibate]]. Other [[Christian furs]] believe that the Bible verses and [[Wikipedia:sacred tradition|sacred traditions]] cited against homosexuality are misinterpreted.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark The furries of 'Rainbow Ark'] [http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark/profile take this view]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Both sides maintain a cordial relationship with each other and try to promote mutual understanding.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; [http://www.gaychristian.net/greatdebate.php This website] summarizes the arguments in the debate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===General surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimates of the incidence of homosexuality in the general population vary greatly, due in part to the lack of reliable survey data and the difficulty in defining [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_orientation sexual orientations].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Retrieved September 28th, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey's]] work ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male|Sexual Behavior in the Human Male]]'' found that &amp;quot;46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or &amp;quot;reacted to&amp;quot; persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives&amp;quot;. In addition, the book stated that &amp;quot;10% of males in the sample were predominantly homosexual between the ages of 16 and 55&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html Research Summary] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Kinsey's book, and its companion ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Female|Sexual Behavior in the Human Female]]'', have received [[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male#Criticism|vocal criticism]] for their findings and methodology.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/reisman.html &amp;quot;Kinsey and the Homosexual Revolution&amp;quot;] by [[Wikipedia: Judith Reisman|Dr. Judith Reisman]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.swlearning.com/quant/kohler/stat/biographical_sketches/bio15.1.html Biography of Statician] [[Wikipedia:John Tukey|John W. Tukey]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:American conservative|American conservative]] [[Wikipedia:magazine|magazine]] ''[[Wikipedia:Human Events|Human Events]]'' calls the Kinsey Report the fourth [http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=7591 Most Harmful Book of the 19th and 20th Centuries].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Catholic Church|Roman Catholic]] [[Wikipedia:Higher education in the United States|educational association]] '''[[Wikipedia:Intercollegiate Studies Institute|The Intercollegiate Studies Institute]]''' called it [http://www.mmisi.org/ir/35_01/50worst.pdf &amp;quot;A pervert's attempt to demonstrate that perversion is &amp;quot;statistically&amp;quot;normal&amp;quot;] and the third &amp;quot;Worst Book of the Century&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''[[Wikipedia:The New York Times|The New York Times]]'' called his research &amp;quot;conscientious and comprehensive&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pomeroy, Wardell (1972). Dr. Kinsey and the Institute for Sex Research. New York: Harper &amp;amp; Row.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Professor [[Wikipedia:Martin Duberman|Martin Duberman]] called it &amp;quot;skillful&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;a monumental endeavor&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/publications/duberman.html Book review of] '''[http://www.amazon.com/Alfred-C-Kinsey-Public-Private/dp/0393040860 Alfred C. Kinsey : A Public/Private Life]''' originally published in ''[[Wikipedia:The Nation|The Nation]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several recent surveys done in [[Wikipedia:Western world|Western countries]] such as [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]], [[Wikipedia:Australia|Australia]], and the [[Wikipedia:United States|United States]] typically define between 1% and 10% of the general population, which an average around 5%, as homosexual or bisexual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Accessed December 31, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The British government conducted a country-wide survey in 2005 as part of the [[Wikipedia:Civil_Partnership_Act_2004|''Civil Partnership Act'']]. This study, the only official government study of its kind, stated that 6% of the [[Wikipedia:United Kingdom|United Kingdom]] would be interested in forming a [[Wikipedia:civil union|civil union]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nihe.gov.uk/publications/consultation_documents/Draft%20Policy%20Statement%20on%20SO%20Dec06.pdf Sexual Orientation Policy Statement Draft for Consultation] (pdf)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fandom surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are multiple estimates of the percentage of gays in the furry fandom. It is often thought within the fandom that the number is high, possibly as high as 90%,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; but polls have shown differences in estimation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A 2007 [[Wikipedia:University of California, Davis|University of California at Davis]] study found that 37.3% of respondents were bisexual, 32.7% heterosexual, 25.5% homosexual, and 8% were [[Wikipedia:questioning (sexuality)|uncertain]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://studyf3.livejournal.com/1383.html &amp;quot;Furry Survey Results&amp;quot;] from University of California, Davis: Department of Psychology. Published 2007-05-05. Accessed 2007-05-05.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll used in ''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], showed 25% heterosexual, 19% homosexual, and 48% bisexual out of 360 peopled polled.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Sociology of Furry Fandom]. Retrieved October 19, 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rust concluded that &amp;quot;Truth be told, there are many more homosexual members of the fandom than in general society.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll (of indeterminable date, but before 2005) on the [[IFPL]] used the [[Wikipedia:Kinsey scale|Kinsey scale]] to rate the measure of homosexuality in respondents:&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin: 1em 1em 1em 0; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px #aaa solid; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 95%;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #C6E3FF&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 12.9%&lt;br /&gt;
| (63/487)&lt;br /&gt;
| 0 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively heterosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #A7B1EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.3%&lt;br /&gt;
| (89/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 1 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CBABE2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.7%&lt;br /&gt;
| (91/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, more than incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CF71EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 14.8%&lt;br /&gt;
| (72/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| Equally heterosexual and homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #DF99D4&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 11.3% &lt;br /&gt;
| (55/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 4 &lt;br /&gt;
|Predominately homosexual, more than incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #F79FD1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 16.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (78/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 5 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately homosexual, incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #FFB1D8&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 8.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (39/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 6 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively homosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* A 2006 [http://faod.org/ FAOD] poll showed 25% heterosexual, 20% homosexual, and 55% bisexual (out of 44 polled)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://faod.org/index.php?topic=179.0 FAOD Message Board]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furtopia]] poll (open 2003 to present) stated that 53% were heterosexual, 15% gay, and 30% bisexual out of 862 people polled.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://cgi.furtopia.org/cgi-bin/ib311/ikonboard.cgi?s=411086f03c728556d957bd1ffd9b528a;act=ST;f=77;t=9074 Furtopia Message Board] Retrieved September 5, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furry_Survey|poll]] by [[Alex Osaki]] reported that 42.75% were heterosexual, 16.86% were homosexual, 35.29% were bisexual, and 4.71% self-identified as neither.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey.php Furry Poll Results] as of December 30, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Theories===&lt;br /&gt;
One viable theory involves [[Mark Merlino]], a former chair of [[ConFurence]] who co-founded the first furry [[conventions]]. [[Crush Yiff Destroy]] has suggested that Merlino actively recruited alternative lifestylers into the fandom, and that this influences furry demographics to this day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.crushyiffdestroy.com/show/merlino &amp;quot;Journey to the Center of Mark Merlino&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Furries also guess that, since having a [[non-furry]] significant other and raising children may result in a fan having less time and money to devote to the fandom, gays are over-represented because they are less likely to be raising children.{{fact}} Some speculate that the negative [[Wikipedia:social stigma|social stigma]] [[Wikipedia:Furry fandom#Media coverage|attached to the fandom]] keeps away heterosexual [[mundanes]] who would otherwise feel interested. David Rust has stated that &amp;quot;The social variations for Furries may seem unusual from a generic, American viewpoint. However, from the position of a group of people who are already predisposed to enjoying anthropomorphic animals, other concepts such as homosexuality... seem somewhat mundane and unimportant by comparison.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Others guess that gays are not over-represented, but that they are simply much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow fans than they are in other areas of their life.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
One other theory is that the demographics of the fandom is reasonably close to the general population. It just happens that people who become furries, a [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']] of sorts, become more exposed to alternate lifestyles and may reconsider their own sexuality, which might result in a paralell [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']].{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Relationship terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sociology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Sexual_orientation</id>
		<title>Talk:Sexual orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Sexual_orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-03T02:06:13Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* Gay-&amp;gt;Sexual preference? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Sorry, that last edit was me.  --Brody&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Incorrect data==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just added all of the percentages together on the Kinsey scale chart because I was thinking about making a cumulative frequency table for it or something, but I found that the percentages only add up to 97% when they should add up to 100%, so could we correct this please? Thanks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
| Kinsey rank&lt;br /&gt;
| Percentage&lt;br /&gt;
| Cumulative freq.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| 12&lt;br /&gt;
| 12&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| 18&lt;br /&gt;
| 30&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| 18&lt;br /&gt;
| 48&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| 14&lt;br /&gt;
| 62&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4&lt;br /&gt;
| 11&lt;br /&gt;
| 73&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5&lt;br /&gt;
| 16&lt;br /&gt;
| 89&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6&lt;br /&gt;
| 8&lt;br /&gt;
| 97&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Total:&lt;br /&gt;
| 97%&lt;br /&gt;
| 97%&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Shia|Shia]] 17:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's just because they've been rounded down (like 12.9 -&amp;gt; 12). I'll add in the decimal points. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:04, 29 May 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FAOD Poll ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is a web-poll with 44 responses statistically solid?  Granted it's always difficult to get well-sampled and unbiased results about highly personal topics, but with fewer than a hundred or so responses and the fact that polls within a community tend to be unavoidably self-selecting there's so much potential bias in either direction that they could arguably be considered anecdotal. --[[User:Riismo|Riismo]] 22:21, 5 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some observations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are a few observations and speculations I've made regarding homosexuality in furry fandom.  Feel free to mull over these and offer any suggestions on whether you think they're accurate or not, and if so, whether they should be incorporated into the article (I am using the term &amp;quot;gays&amp;quot; throughout to represent both genders):&lt;br /&gt;
*The polls quoted here, and at least one other I'm aware of, suggest that the proportion of gays in furry fandom is approximately three times the proportion of gays in the general population;&lt;br /&gt;
*If that figure seems low, I can think of a few reasons why it might seem to be much higher:&lt;br /&gt;
**Gays are much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow furry fans than they are in other areas of their life, such as school and the workplace.  Statistically it may be true that 5-10% of the people at my workplace are gay, but I seldom find out who they are.  The proportion of gays among furries may only be 3x what it is in my workplace, but the proportion of gays ''that I know about'' is far greater;&lt;br /&gt;
**Having a non-furry S.O. and having children (whether natural, adopted, or foster) are two factors that often result in a fan having less time and money to devote to things furry, and having to limit one's involvement due to other priorities.  Gays are more likely than straight folk to have an S.O. who is also a furry fan, and are less likely than straight folk to be raising children  (Granted, every individual's situation is different, but averaged over a large number of people I would be surprised if this is not the case);&lt;br /&gt;
*Gays already have to deal with the idea that one major area of their lives goes against what is considered normal by a large segment of society.  As such, the idea of having an interest that some would consider unusual or weird is not as big a leap as it is for someone who hasn't been down that road;&lt;br /&gt;
*How much greater is the awareness of the existence of furry fandom among gays compared to straights?  I honestly don't know, but if more people among any demographic (such as gays) knows of the existence of furry fandom, it follows that more people from among that group would become furry fans.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 20:05, 10 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some thoughts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Wouldn't it be nice if the table had each row color-coded? With the top one a certain solid color, the bottom one another solid color, and the middle row a blend of the two? I suggest a red-blue or a yellow-blue pattern.* I have no idea how to do this, but the syntax might be on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Table#Examples this wiki help page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Dr.Kinsey's ''Sexual Behavior in the Human Male'' found that &amp;quot;46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or &amp;quot;reacted to&amp;quot; persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives&amp;quot;. In addition, &amp;quot;Kinsey said in both the Male and Female volumes that it was impossible to determine the number of persons who are &amp;quot;homosexual&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;heterosexual&amp;quot;. It was only possible to determine behavior at any given time&amp;quot;- &amp;quot;10% of males in the sample were predominantly homosexual between the ages of 16 and 55&amp;quot;. See [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Am I arguing that furry fandom is represenative of the general population? No. However, I think that the article really needs some necessary context. In the world [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAH_mjLhreE that most people live in], someone with the genetic background/social background of a 1/2, 1, 2, or a 2 1/2- et cetera- would probably self-identify as 'straight' throughout their life. The same might not be true for furries.** &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; One could argue that the color red signifies 'bad' or the color yellow signifies 'sickly'. I don't know. It's just a suggestion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;**&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; I say &amp;quot;might&amp;quot; because, well, how would [[mundane|I]] know?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 05:13, 26 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gay-&amp;gt;Sexual preference? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This use to be the [[Gay]] article (?.) Why try to overwrite the original entry with another subject instead of starting a new one (&amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot;,) and migrate the pertinent (&amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot;) data to it?. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, you got an article with several subjects/ideas/opinions trying to make a (several) point(s) while making none (i.e &amp;quot;''the term 'sexual preference' is more broad and includes personal attitudes in between the '''three''' general categories defined as sexual orientations,...''&amp;quot; Three, but the following paragraph now lists five,)...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article seems to be in a dire need of a top to bottom cleanup/revamp =P [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 01:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:...And, why so many redirects for a single article? ¬_¬ [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 01:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I merged 'heterosexual' and 'bisexual' into 'homosexual' since the two articles were one-/two-sentences stubs with little hope of future content. None of the information that was in the original 'homosexual' article has been removed. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 01:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't see what specifically needs to be cleaned-up besides the lead paragraph, which I fiddled with a little bit. What sections need revising? [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 02:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Why not have a lot of redirects? The words being re-directed- Sexual orientation, Sexual orientations, Sexual Preferences, homosexuals, homosexuality, gay, gays, et cetera- all fall clearly under this article. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 02:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Sexual_orientation</id>
		<title>Talk:Sexual orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Sexual_orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-03T02:05:43Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* Gay-&amp;gt;Sexual preference? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Sorry, that last edit was me.  --Brody&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Incorrect data==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just added all of the percentages together on the Kinsey scale chart because I was thinking about making a cumulative frequency table for it or something, but I found that the percentages only add up to 97% when they should add up to 100%, so could we correct this please? Thanks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
| Kinsey rank&lt;br /&gt;
| Percentage&lt;br /&gt;
| Cumulative freq.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| 12&lt;br /&gt;
| 12&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| 18&lt;br /&gt;
| 30&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| 18&lt;br /&gt;
| 48&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| 14&lt;br /&gt;
| 62&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4&lt;br /&gt;
| 11&lt;br /&gt;
| 73&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5&lt;br /&gt;
| 16&lt;br /&gt;
| 89&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6&lt;br /&gt;
| 8&lt;br /&gt;
| 97&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Total:&lt;br /&gt;
| 97%&lt;br /&gt;
| 97%&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Shia|Shia]] 17:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's just because they've been rounded down (like 12.9 -&amp;gt; 12). I'll add in the decimal points. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:04, 29 May 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FAOD Poll ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is a web-poll with 44 responses statistically solid?  Granted it's always difficult to get well-sampled and unbiased results about highly personal topics, but with fewer than a hundred or so responses and the fact that polls within a community tend to be unavoidably self-selecting there's so much potential bias in either direction that they could arguably be considered anecdotal. --[[User:Riismo|Riismo]] 22:21, 5 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some observations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are a few observations and speculations I've made regarding homosexuality in furry fandom.  Feel free to mull over these and offer any suggestions on whether you think they're accurate or not, and if so, whether they should be incorporated into the article (I am using the term &amp;quot;gays&amp;quot; throughout to represent both genders):&lt;br /&gt;
*The polls quoted here, and at least one other I'm aware of, suggest that the proportion of gays in furry fandom is approximately three times the proportion of gays in the general population;&lt;br /&gt;
*If that figure seems low, I can think of a few reasons why it might seem to be much higher:&lt;br /&gt;
**Gays are much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow furry fans than they are in other areas of their life, such as school and the workplace.  Statistically it may be true that 5-10% of the people at my workplace are gay, but I seldom find out who they are.  The proportion of gays among furries may only be 3x what it is in my workplace, but the proportion of gays ''that I know about'' is far greater;&lt;br /&gt;
**Having a non-furry S.O. and having children (whether natural, adopted, or foster) are two factors that often result in a fan having less time and money to devote to things furry, and having to limit one's involvement due to other priorities.  Gays are more likely than straight folk to have an S.O. who is also a furry fan, and are less likely than straight folk to be raising children  (Granted, every individual's situation is different, but averaged over a large number of people I would be surprised if this is not the case);&lt;br /&gt;
*Gays already have to deal with the idea that one major area of their lives goes against what is considered normal by a large segment of society.  As such, the idea of having an interest that some would consider unusual or weird is not as big a leap as it is for someone who hasn't been down that road;&lt;br /&gt;
*How much greater is the awareness of the existence of furry fandom among gays compared to straights?  I honestly don't know, but if more people among any demographic (such as gays) knows of the existence of furry fandom, it follows that more people from among that group would become furry fans.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 20:05, 10 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some thoughts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Wouldn't it be nice if the table had each row color-coded? With the top one a certain solid color, the bottom one another solid color, and the middle row a blend of the two? I suggest a red-blue or a yellow-blue pattern.* I have no idea how to do this, but the syntax might be on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Table#Examples this wiki help page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Dr.Kinsey's ''Sexual Behavior in the Human Male'' found that &amp;quot;46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or &amp;quot;reacted to&amp;quot; persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives&amp;quot;. In addition, &amp;quot;Kinsey said in both the Male and Female volumes that it was impossible to determine the number of persons who are &amp;quot;homosexual&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;heterosexual&amp;quot;. It was only possible to determine behavior at any given time&amp;quot;- &amp;quot;10% of males in the sample were predominantly homosexual between the ages of 16 and 55&amp;quot;. See [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Am I arguing that furry fandom is represenative of the general population? No. However, I think that the article really needs some necessary context. In the world [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAH_mjLhreE that most people live in], someone with the genetic background/social background of a 1/2, 1, 2, or a 2 1/2- et cetera- would probably self-identify as 'straight' throughout their life. The same might not be true for furries.** &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; One could argue that the color red signifies 'bad' or the color yellow signifies 'sickly'. I don't know. It's just a suggestion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;**&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; I say &amp;quot;might&amp;quot; because, well, how would [[mundane|I]] know?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 05:13, 26 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gay-&amp;gt;Sexual preference? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This use to be the [[Gay]] article (?.) Why try to overwrite the original entry with another subject instead of starting a new one (&amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot;,) and migrate the pertinent (&amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot;) data to it?. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, you got an article with several subjects/ideas/opinions trying to make a (several) point(s) while making none (i.e &amp;quot;''the term 'sexual preference' is more broad and includes personal attitudes in between the '''three''' general categories defined as sexual orientations,...''&amp;quot; Three, but the following paragraph now lists five,)...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article seems to be in a dire need of a top to bottom cleanup/revamp =P [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 01:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:...And, why so many redirects for a single article? ¬_¬ [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 01:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I merged 'heterosexual' and 'bisexual' into 'homosexual' since the two articles were one-/two-sentences stubs with little hope of future content. None of the information that was in the original 'homosexual' article has been removed. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 01:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't see what specifically needs to be cleaned-up besides the lead paragraph, which I fiddled with a little bit. What sections need revising? [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 02:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Why not have a lot of redirects? The words being re-directed- Sexual orientation, Sexual orientations, Sexual Preferences, homosexuals, homosexuality, gay, gays, et cetera- all fall clearly under this article.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation</id>
		<title>Sexual orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-03T02:00:04Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{cleanup}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{context}}&lt;br /&gt;
''This page is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Orphan orphaned] since few other WikiFur articles link to it. [http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/WikiFur:About You can help!]'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gay_flag.png|right|thumb|150px|The rainbow flag associated with [[wikipedia:homosexuality|homosexuality]] in and out of the [[furry fandom|fandom]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sexual preference''' describes the gender or genders that someone feels sexually attracted to. The term [[wikipedia:Sexual_orientation|'''sexual orientation''']] is often used interchangably, but the term 'sexual preference' is more broad and includes personal attitudes in between the three general categories defined as [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientations]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Wikipedia:Heterosexuality|'''Heterosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the opposite gender. [[Wikipedia:Bisexuality|'''Bisexuality''']] is the sexual attraction to members of both sexes, [[male]] and [[female]]. [[wikipedia:homosexuality|'''Homosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the same gender. '''Gay''' is often used synonymously with '''homosexual''', but the term '''gay''' usually refers to [[male|male/male]] relationships while the term '''[[Wikipedia:lesbian|lesbian]]''' refers to [[female|female/female]] relationships. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Gay''' is sometimes used inaccurately to refer to both homosexuals and bisexuals. In addition, a small, atypical minority of individuals do not express attraction to either gender and are considered '''[[Wikipedia:asexual|asexual]]'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sexual preferences within the [[furry fandom]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[non-furry|Non-furries]] generally take the position that a significantly larger proportion of the [[furry fandom]] is gay or bisexual compared to the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; A lack of completely reliable survey data exists within both the fandom&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The studies that have been done suggest that this is true, though not to the large extent that is often suggested.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Furries have suggested various theories for this. A lack of completely reliable survey data exists within both the fandom&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Categorization==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current [[Wikipedia:scientific consensus|scientific consensus]] advocated by various social and educational organizations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;such as the [[Wikipedia:American Psychiatric Association|American Psychiatric Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Psychological Association|American Psychological Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Counseling Association|American Counseling Association]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of Social Workers|National Association of Social Workers]], the [[Wikipedia:American Academy of Pediatrics|American Academy of Pediatrics]], the [[Wikipedia:American Association of School Administrators|American Association of School Administrators]], the [[Wikipedia:American Federation of Teachers|American Federation of Teachers]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of School Psychologists|National Association of School Psychologists]], and the [[Wikipedia:National Education Association|National Education Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is that people develop their own permanent, unchangeable [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientation]] within one of the three categories in their [[Wikipedia:childhood|early childhood]] as [[Wikipedia:Biology and sexual orientation|a combination of genetic tendencies and their social environment]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/publications/justthefacts.html Just the Facts About Sexual Orientation &amp;amp; Youth: A Primer for Principals, Educators and School Personnel] 1999, American Psychological Association&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minority of researchers, sometimes known as [[Wikipedia:Queer theory|'queer theorists']], believe that the concept of sexual orientations is a [[Wikipedia:social construct|social construct]] and that people naturally exhibit a variety of attractions. Some furries also subscribe to this view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pressedfur.coolfreepages.com/essay/postvixen/index.html &amp;quot;Sitting On the Third Side of the Fence&amp;quot;] by Hannah Kincaid from [[Pressed Fur]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although he did not advocate the social construct theory, [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey]] stated that &amp;quot;[[Males]] do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual... The living world is a continuum in each and every one of its aspects.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-hhscale.html &amp;quot;Kinsey's Heterosexual-Homosexual Rating Scale&amp;quot;] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He postulated a [[Wikipedia:Kinsey Scale|scale]] of sexual preferences from zero to six, zero being exclusively heterosexual.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social attitudes among furries==&lt;br /&gt;
''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], found that &amp;quot;race, religion and sexual orientation (as divisive factors) are simply too minor to attract any real attention&amp;quot; and that furries have &amp;quot;higher tolerance for variety in sexual orientation and activity&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A small yet significant minority of furries self-identify as [[Christian furs|Christian]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Some of them believe in the [[Wikipedia:the bible and homosexuality|traditional Christian view]] that homosexual conduct is immoral and that homosexuals should be [[Wikipedia:celibacy|celibate]]. Other [[Christian furs]] believe that the Bible verses and [[Wikipedia:sacred tradition|sacred traditions]] cited against homosexuality are misinterpreted.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark The furries of 'Rainbow Ark'] [http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark/profile take this view]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Both sides maintain a cordial relationship with each other and try to promote mutual understanding.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; [http://www.gaychristian.net/greatdebate.php This website] summarizes the arguments in the debate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===General surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimates of the incidence of homosexuality in the general population vary greatly, due in part to the lack of reliable survey data and the difficulty in defining [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_orientation sexual orientations].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Retrieved September 28th, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey's]] work ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male|Sexual Behavior in the Human Male]]'' found that &amp;quot;46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or &amp;quot;reacted to&amp;quot; persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives&amp;quot;. In addition, the book stated that &amp;quot;10% of males in the sample were predominantly homosexual between the ages of 16 and 55&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html Research Summary] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Kinsey's book, and its companion ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Female|Sexual Behavior in the Human Female]]'', have received [[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male#Criticism|vocal criticism]] for their findings and methodology.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/reisman.html &amp;quot;Kinsey and the Homosexual Revolution&amp;quot;] by [[Wikipedia: Judith Reisman|Dr. Judith Reisman]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.swlearning.com/quant/kohler/stat/biographical_sketches/bio15.1.html Biography of Statician] [[Wikipedia:John Tukey|John W. Tukey]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:American conservative|American conservative]] [[Wikipedia:magazine|magazine]] ''[[Wikipedia:Human Events|Human Events]]'' calls the Kinsey Report the fourth [http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=7591 Most Harmful Book of the 19th and 20th Centuries].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Catholic Church|Roman Catholic]] [[Wikipedia:Higher education in the United States|educational association]] '''[[Wikipedia:Intercollegiate Studies Institute|The Intercollegiate Studies Institute]]''' called it [http://www.mmisi.org/ir/35_01/50worst.pdf &amp;quot;A pervert's attempt to demonstrate that perversion is &amp;quot;statistically&amp;quot;normal&amp;quot;] and the third &amp;quot;Worst Book of the Century&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''[[Wikipedia:The New York Times|The New York Times]]'' called his research &amp;quot;conscientious and comprehensive&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pomeroy, Wardell (1972). Dr. Kinsey and the Institute for Sex Research. New York: Harper &amp;amp; Row.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Professor [[Wikipedia:Martin Duberman|Martin Duberman]] called it &amp;quot;skillful&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;a monumental endeavor&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/publications/duberman.html Book review of] '''[http://www.amazon.com/Alfred-C-Kinsey-Public-Private/dp/0393040860 Alfred C. Kinsey : A Public/Private Life]''' originally published in ''[[Wikipedia:The Nation|The Nation]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several recent surveys done in [[Wikipedia:Western world|Western countries]] such as [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]], [[Wikipedia:Australia|Australia]], and the [[Wikipedia:United States|United States]] typically define between 1% and 10% of the general population, which an average around 5%, as homosexual or bisexual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Accessed December 31, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The British government conducted a country-wide survey in 2005 as part of the [[Wikipedia:Civil_Partnership_Act_2004|''Civil Partnership Act'']]. This study, the only official government study of its kind, stated that 6% of the [[Wikipedia:United Kingdom|United Kingdom]] would be interested in forming a [[Wikipedia:civil union|civil union]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nihe.gov.uk/publications/consultation_documents/Draft%20Policy%20Statement%20on%20SO%20Dec06.pdf Sexual Orientation Policy Statement Draft for Consultation] (pdf)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fandom surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are multiple estimates of the percentage of gays in the furry fandom. It is often thought within the fandom that the number is high, possibly as high as 90%,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; but polls have shown differences in estimation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A 2007 [[Wikipedia:University of California, Davis|University of California at Davis]] study found that 37.3% of respondents were bisexual, 32.7% heterosexual, 25.5% homosexual, and 8% were [[Wikipedia:questioning (sexuality)|uncertain]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://studyf3.livejournal.com/1383.html &amp;quot;Furry Survey Results&amp;quot;] from University of California, Davis: Department of Psychology. Published 2007-05-05. Accessed 2007-05-05.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll used in ''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], showed 25% heterosexual, 19% homosexual, and 48% bisexual out of 360 peopled polled.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Sociology of Furry Fandom]. Retrieved October 19, 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rust concluded that &amp;quot;Truth be told, there are many more homosexual members of the fandom than in general society.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll (of indeterminable date, but before 2005) on the [[IFPL]] used the [[Wikipedia:Kinsey scale|Kinsey scale]] to rate the measure of homosexuality in respondents:&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin: 1em 1em 1em 0; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px #aaa solid; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 95%;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #C6E3FF&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 12.9%&lt;br /&gt;
| (63/487)&lt;br /&gt;
| 0 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively heterosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #A7B1EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.3%&lt;br /&gt;
| (89/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 1 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CBABE2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.7%&lt;br /&gt;
| (91/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, more than incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CF71EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 14.8%&lt;br /&gt;
| (72/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| Equally heterosexual and homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #DF99D4&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 11.3% &lt;br /&gt;
| (55/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 4 &lt;br /&gt;
|Predominately homosexual, more than incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #F79FD1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 16.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (78/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 5 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately homosexual, incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #FFB1D8&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 8.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (39/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 6 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively homosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* A 2006 [http://faod.org/ FAOD] poll showed 25% heterosexual, 20% homosexual, and 55% bisexual (out of 44 polled)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://faod.org/index.php?topic=179.0 FAOD Message Board]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furtopia]] poll (open 2003 to present) stated that 53% were heterosexual, 15% gay, and 30% bisexual out of 862 people polled.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://cgi.furtopia.org/cgi-bin/ib311/ikonboard.cgi?s=411086f03c728556d957bd1ffd9b528a;act=ST;f=77;t=9074 Furtopia Message Board] Retrieved September 5, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furry_Survey|poll]] by [[Alex Osaki]] reported that 42.75% were heterosexual, 16.86% were homosexual, 35.29% were bisexual, and 4.71% self-identified as neither.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey.php Furry Poll Results] as of December 30, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Theories===&lt;br /&gt;
One viable theory involves [[Mark Merlino]], a former chair of [[ConFurence]] who co-founded the first furry [[conventions]]. [[Crush Yiff Destroy]] has suggested that Merlino actively recruited alternative lifestylers into the fandom, and that this influences furry demographics to this day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.crushyiffdestroy.com/show/merlino &amp;quot;Journey to the Center of Mark Merlino&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Furries also guess that, since having a [[non-furry]] significant other and raising children may result in a fan having less time and money to devote to the fandom, gays are over-represented because they are less likely to be raising children.{{fact}} Some speculate that the negative [[Wikipedia:social stigma|social stigma]] [[Wikipedia:Furry fandom#Media coverage|attached to the fandom]] keeps away heterosexual [[mundanes]] who would otherwise feel interested. David Rust has stated that &amp;quot;The social variations for Furries may seem unusual from a generic, American viewpoint. However, from the position of a group of people who are already predisposed to enjoying anthropomorphic animals, other concepts such as homosexuality... seem somewhat mundane and unimportant by comparison.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Others guess that gays are not over-represented, but that they are simply much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow fans than they are in other areas of their life.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
One other theory is that the demographics of the fandom is reasonably close to the general population. It just happens that people who become furries, a [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']] of sorts, become more exposed to alternate lifestyles and may reconsider their own sexuality, which might result in a paralell [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']].{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Relationship terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sociology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Sexual_orientation</id>
		<title>Talk:Sexual orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Sexual_orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-03T01:53:50Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* Gay-&amp;gt;Sexual preference? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Sorry, that last edit was me.  --Brody&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Incorrect data==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just added all of the percentages together on the Kinsey scale chart because I was thinking about making a cumulative frequency table for it or something, but I found that the percentages only add up to 97% when they should add up to 100%, so could we correct this please? Thanks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
| Kinsey rank&lt;br /&gt;
| Percentage&lt;br /&gt;
| Cumulative freq.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| 12&lt;br /&gt;
| 12&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| 18&lt;br /&gt;
| 30&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| 18&lt;br /&gt;
| 48&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| 14&lt;br /&gt;
| 62&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 4&lt;br /&gt;
| 11&lt;br /&gt;
| 73&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5&lt;br /&gt;
| 16&lt;br /&gt;
| 89&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6&lt;br /&gt;
| 8&lt;br /&gt;
| 97&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Total:&lt;br /&gt;
| 97%&lt;br /&gt;
| 97%&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Shia|Shia]] 17:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's just because they've been rounded down (like 12.9 -&amp;gt; 12). I'll add in the decimal points. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:04, 29 May 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FAOD Poll ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is a web-poll with 44 responses statistically solid?  Granted it's always difficult to get well-sampled and unbiased results about highly personal topics, but with fewer than a hundred or so responses and the fact that polls within a community tend to be unavoidably self-selecting there's so much potential bias in either direction that they could arguably be considered anecdotal. --[[User:Riismo|Riismo]] 22:21, 5 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some observations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are a few observations and speculations I've made regarding homosexuality in furry fandom.  Feel free to mull over these and offer any suggestions on whether you think they're accurate or not, and if so, whether they should be incorporated into the article (I am using the term &amp;quot;gays&amp;quot; throughout to represent both genders):&lt;br /&gt;
*The polls quoted here, and at least one other I'm aware of, suggest that the proportion of gays in furry fandom is approximately three times the proportion of gays in the general population;&lt;br /&gt;
*If that figure seems low, I can think of a few reasons why it might seem to be much higher:&lt;br /&gt;
**Gays are much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow furry fans than they are in other areas of their life, such as school and the workplace.  Statistically it may be true that 5-10% of the people at my workplace are gay, but I seldom find out who they are.  The proportion of gays among furries may only be 3x what it is in my workplace, but the proportion of gays ''that I know about'' is far greater;&lt;br /&gt;
**Having a non-furry S.O. and having children (whether natural, adopted, or foster) are two factors that often result in a fan having less time and money to devote to things furry, and having to limit one's involvement due to other priorities.  Gays are more likely than straight folk to have an S.O. who is also a furry fan, and are less likely than straight folk to be raising children  (Granted, every individual's situation is different, but averaged over a large number of people I would be surprised if this is not the case);&lt;br /&gt;
*Gays already have to deal with the idea that one major area of their lives goes against what is considered normal by a large segment of society.  As such, the idea of having an interest that some would consider unusual or weird is not as big a leap as it is for someone who hasn't been down that road;&lt;br /&gt;
*How much greater is the awareness of the existence of furry fandom among gays compared to straights?  I honestly don't know, but if more people among any demographic (such as gays) knows of the existence of furry fandom, it follows that more people from among that group would become furry fans.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 20:05, 10 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some thoughts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Wouldn't it be nice if the table had each row color-coded? With the top one a certain solid color, the bottom one another solid color, and the middle row a blend of the two? I suggest a red-blue or a yellow-blue pattern.* I have no idea how to do this, but the syntax might be on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Table#Examples this wiki help page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Dr.Kinsey's ''Sexual Behavior in the Human Male'' found that &amp;quot;46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or &amp;quot;reacted to&amp;quot; persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives&amp;quot;. In addition, &amp;quot;Kinsey said in both the Male and Female volumes that it was impossible to determine the number of persons who are &amp;quot;homosexual&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;heterosexual&amp;quot;. It was only possible to determine behavior at any given time&amp;quot;- &amp;quot;10% of males in the sample were predominantly homosexual between the ages of 16 and 55&amp;quot;. See [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html this page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Am I arguing that furry fandom is represenative of the general population? No. However, I think that the article really needs some necessary context. In the world [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAH_mjLhreE that most people live in], someone with the genetic background/social background of a 1/2, 1, 2, or a 2 1/2- et cetera- would probably self-identify as 'straight' throughout their life. The same might not be true for furries.** &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; One could argue that the color red signifies 'bad' or the color yellow signifies 'sickly'. I don't know. It's just a suggestion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;**&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; I say &amp;quot;might&amp;quot; because, well, how would [[mundane|I]] know?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 05:13, 26 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gay-&amp;gt;Sexual preference? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This use to be the [[Gay]] article (?.) Why try to overwrite the original entry with another subject instead of starting a new one (&amp;quot;Sexual preference&amp;quot;,) and migrate the pertinent (&amp;quot;Gay&amp;quot;) data to it?. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, you got an article with several subjects/ideas/opinions trying to make a (several) point(s) while making none (i.e &amp;quot;''the term 'sexual preference' is more broad and includes personal attitudes in between the '''three''' general categories defined as sexual orientations,...''&amp;quot; Three, but the following paragraph now lists five,)...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article seems to be in a dire need of a top to bottom cleanup/revamp =P [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 01:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:...And, why so many redirects for a single article? ¬_¬ [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 01:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I merged 'heterosexual' and 'bisexual' into 'homosexual' since the two articles were one-/two-sentences stubs with little hope of future content. None of the information that was in the original 'homosexual' article has been removed. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 01:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/User_talk:Boingo</id>
		<title>User talk:Boingo</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/User_talk:Boingo"/>
				<updated>2008-01-03T01:36:04Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* These might be stupid questions... */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Welcome to [[WikiFur]]! Thank you for registering an account. We here at [[WikiFur]] look forward to working with you. [[Forum:Help desk|Let us know]] if you need any [[help]] not already provided. If you would like help creating an article or just editing it, don't hesitate to consult the [[Help:Furry Book of Style|Furry Book of Style]] or just contact an [[WikiFur:Administrator|administrator]]. Have a nice day! :-)&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rat|Rat]] 01:24, 24 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How do you mess with the colors/shading on a wiki table? I proposed something like that for [[Talk:Homosexuality|this page]]. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 07:49, 27 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Same as on a normal HTML table, except that there are certain limitations to prevent problems (most notably, you can't set an image as a background unless you do so via sitewide CSS). Probably what you would find most useful is the background-color style. Have a look at any HTML tutorial out there and you should find some tips on HTML tables that you can put to use here. You might also find [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Table Help:Table] useful. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:05, 27 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I made my proposed changes. [[Homosexuality|What do you think?]] [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 01:24, 28 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thought the colours were a little strong, so I tweaked them so that the text was more readable. You can do unordered lists using * at the front.  --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== These might be stupid questions... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
but I still would like to ask:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it always unacceptable to add a link to [[[encyclopedia dramatica]] to a page (Looking something like this: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Aeris A satrical take on the 'Mary Sue' phenomenon]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;), or does it depend on the circumstances?&lt;br /&gt;
*What's the policy on using someone's real, birth-cirtificate listed name in their biographical article?&lt;br /&gt;
*What's the policy on using real life pictures in biographical articles?&lt;br /&gt;
*Since they're so short and they don't really have any prospects for more content, shouldn't the articles '[[bisexual]]' and '[[heterosexual]]' be merged into '[[homosexual]]' to create '[[sexual preference]]'?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 05:03, 29 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:All content decisions are made on a case by case basis. However, ED rarely makes a good link, due to its habit of putting a highly negative spin on any subject that it covers (except for those which result in the glorification of drama). Its editors are also quite willing to make things up if doing so results in &amp;quot;lulz&amp;quot;. For these reasons and others, linking to ED is strongly discouraged, and I would advise you to treat anything you find there with caution. For the specific example you give, there seems no reason not to just use an interwiki link to Wikipedia, which has a perfectly good article on the topic. We would not need to have a separate article as it is not a furry topic.&lt;br /&gt;
:Our policy with birth names is to look at whether or not that name is being concealed in any way. For example, many artists actually go by their real names. Others use fan names alongside their real names. Still others make no mention of their real names, even on the websites containing their work. In the latter case, the use of the real name (if you know it) is probably not appropriate. Real names will usually be removed on request from the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
:The same thing goes for real life pictures. If you know, or have reason to believe that someone would not want their picture on WikiFur, it is probably best not to put it here. On the other hand, many people do not mind, and it can be a useful means of identification.&lt;br /&gt;
:Don't really have an opinion on the last. If you think doing so would make a better encyclopedia, you should do so. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:24, 29 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I made the changes. I'd like to ask you some things about the [[sexual preference]] page.&lt;br /&gt;
*I wrote a snippet saying that some people think that sexual orientation is an artificial construct and does not really exist. But I don't know of any furries advocating that position besides the one person that I linked.&lt;br /&gt;
*I altered the colors on the table so it has the holistic, ying-yang style of intermixed pink and blue. I tried to lighten the colors a lot compared to my first try at it. How does it look now?&lt;br /&gt;
*I wrote a section saying that a cordial split exists among Christian furs between those who believe homosexuality is immoral and those who disagree. Is this accurate? Or do all (or nearly all) of the Christian furries accept homosexuality? The only anti-gay-marriage furry that I know of is [[Prince Jeremy]].*&lt;br /&gt;
*I'd like to find citations for the theories saying ''since having a [[non-furry]] significant other and raising children may result in a fan having less time and money to devote to the fandom, gays are over-represented because they are less likely to be raising children'' and ''Others guess that gays are not over-represented, but that they are simply much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow fans than they are in other areas of their life.''&lt;br /&gt;
*One other theory is that the demographics of the fandom is reasonably close to the general population. It just happens that people who become furries (a 'coming out' of sorts) become more exposed to alternate lifestyles (which might result in a paralell 'coming out'). I considered adding this to the article, but I didn't because it seems overly speculative.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 07:32, 31 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;Based on his infamous &amp;quot;you all belong in concentration camps&amp;quot; comment. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 23:44, 31 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have made [http://furry.wikia.com/index.php?title=Sexual_preference&amp;amp;diff=177377&amp;amp;oldid=177376 further edits]. Some general points:&lt;br /&gt;
:*If you are intending to move one page to another title, use the Move tab at the top rather than cut and pasting. Doing the latter breaks the edit history, and deprives others of the credit for their prior edits, which is required for [[WikiFur:Copyrights|GFDL]] compliance.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Link to Wikipedia by using &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Article name|text to display]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Per the [[WikiFur:Furry Book of Style|style guide]], only the first word of titles should be capitalized unless the word would normally be capitalized (like a name).&lt;br /&gt;
:*Use a spellchecker. :-) If you use a [http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-beta.html recent beta of Firefox] it will have one built in.&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer your questions:&lt;br /&gt;
:*The table looks fine to me.&lt;br /&gt;
:*I suspect there are some who are less than enthused about it, but I do not know for sure. You could always ask the community of Christian furs (or see if the question has been asked already). Jeremy would be an outlier for most purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
:*I'm not sure you can really get a citation for that, but you could give examples of involvement in such activities. For example, very significant proportions of the leadership at [[convention]]s and other furry events are gay, including key members of (at least) [[List of conventions by attendance|the top five event by attendance]], as well as the larger ones overseas. I should note that leadership in this area is not exclusive - as far as I know, there is no &amp;quot;anti-breeder&amp;quot; bias - but if you look closely it is a very clear trend. It might be because gay community members are more interested in organizing communal events. I don't know.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Possible. I think the current situation is a combination of this effect and others. Again, more research is required. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I apologize for messing up the move (I only did it once before in my Wikipedia days). I didn't realize how to use the Wikilink code until I was about halfway through editing the page; I'll use it the correct way in the future.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''I suspect there are some who are less than enthused about it, but I do not know for sure. You could always ask the community of Christian furs'' I've read a lot of furries' livejournals but I don't have one myself (and- to be honest with you- I really do not want one, especially after reading several &amp;quot;if I see him again, I'll rip his f*cking throat out&amp;quot; posts.) Has [[Kendricks]] been editing on Wikifur recently? Could I ask him on his talk page?&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''Jeremy would be an outlier for most purposes.'' I don't know what you mean by &amp;quot;outlier&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''as far as I know, there is no &amp;quot;anti-breeder&amp;quot; bias - but if you look closely it is a very clear trend'' I don't know what &amp;quot;anti-breeder&amp;quot; means. I'm a compete noob, so I don't know the furry lexicon (Please resist the urge to choke my neck with your mind as you type your response).&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''Possible. I think the current situation is a combination of this effect and others. Again, more research is required.'' I see. I think the [[Sexual_preference#Theories|theories section]] does a good job of describing every viewpoint. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 23:15, 1 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::*I edited the page so that the praises and criticisms of the Kinsey reports now have exact citations. The only major omission that I can still see is that the article doesn't talk about transgender furries (and/or furries with fursonas of the opposite gender)- but I don't know if this should be mentioned at all. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 00:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::*No worries about the formatting/move issues, we're all learning here. :-)&lt;br /&gt;
::::*An [[Wikipedia:outlier|outlier]] is a data point which does not &amp;quot;fit the curve&amp;quot; (and which is typically discarded)&lt;br /&gt;
::::*&amp;quot;[[Wikipedia:breeder (slang)|Breeder]]&amp;quot; is slang term used by some homosexuals for heterosexuals, and by some &amp;quot;child-free&amp;quot; couples who dislike children in general for all parents. I intended more the former than the latter, although there have been one or two comments that suggest that a minority of the general furry population disagree with the idea of bringing children to conventions. The bit about the &amp;quot;trend&amp;quot; was not intended to apply to that part of the sentence, but the previous line.&lt;br /&gt;
::::*The issue of gender ''identity'' (as opposed to sexual preference) probably deserves coverage, but perhaps not on that page, as it is a different issue. There are individuals in the fandom who exhibit trans-gender behaviour, from the level of experimenting with roleplaying characters (changing gender along with species is a relatively small step) to considering full-blown gender reassignment therapy. My belief is that this are is largely male-to-female, but I could not even hazard a figure (the fact that the fandom is largely male skews this, of course). --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:13, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I agree that gender as an identity is a topic for a seperate page. As far as the [[Christian furs]] topic goes, I don't really know who to ask (or if I can ask, since I don't have an LJ). [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 01:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I would e-mail [[Kendricks]] to ask him about it, but I'm rather paranoid about making wiki related e-mails ever since someone (details ommitted for privacy). I would post on his talk page about it, but he hasn't been editing for a while. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 01:36, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/User_talk:Boingo</id>
		<title>User talk:Boingo</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/User_talk:Boingo"/>
				<updated>2008-01-03T01:31:06Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* These might be stupid questions... */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Welcome to [[WikiFur]]! Thank you for registering an account. We here at [[WikiFur]] look forward to working with you. [[Forum:Help desk|Let us know]] if you need any [[help]] not already provided. If you would like help creating an article or just editing it, don't hesitate to consult the [[Help:Furry Book of Style|Furry Book of Style]] or just contact an [[WikiFur:Administrator|administrator]]. Have a nice day! :-)&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rat|Rat]] 01:24, 24 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How do you mess with the colors/shading on a wiki table? I proposed something like that for [[Talk:Homosexuality|this page]]. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 07:49, 27 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Same as on a normal HTML table, except that there are certain limitations to prevent problems (most notably, you can't set an image as a background unless you do so via sitewide CSS). Probably what you would find most useful is the background-color style. Have a look at any HTML tutorial out there and you should find some tips on HTML tables that you can put to use here. You might also find [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Table Help:Table] useful. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:05, 27 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I made my proposed changes. [[Homosexuality|What do you think?]] [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 01:24, 28 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thought the colours were a little strong, so I tweaked them so that the text was more readable. You can do unordered lists using * at the front.  --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== These might be stupid questions... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
but I still would like to ask:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it always unacceptable to add a link to [[[encyclopedia dramatica]] to a page (Looking something like this: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Aeris A satrical take on the 'Mary Sue' phenomenon]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;), or does it depend on the circumstances?&lt;br /&gt;
*What's the policy on using someone's real, birth-cirtificate listed name in their biographical article?&lt;br /&gt;
*What's the policy on using real life pictures in biographical articles?&lt;br /&gt;
*Since they're so short and they don't really have any prospects for more content, shouldn't the articles '[[bisexual]]' and '[[heterosexual]]' be merged into '[[homosexual]]' to create '[[sexual preference]]'?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 05:03, 29 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:All content decisions are made on a case by case basis. However, ED rarely makes a good link, due to its habit of putting a highly negative spin on any subject that it covers (except for those which result in the glorification of drama). Its editors are also quite willing to make things up if doing so results in &amp;quot;lulz&amp;quot;. For these reasons and others, linking to ED is strongly discouraged, and I would advise you to treat anything you find there with caution. For the specific example you give, there seems no reason not to just use an interwiki link to Wikipedia, which has a perfectly good article on the topic. We would not need to have a separate article as it is not a furry topic.&lt;br /&gt;
:Our policy with birth names is to look at whether or not that name is being concealed in any way. For example, many artists actually go by their real names. Others use fan names alongside their real names. Still others make no mention of their real names, even on the websites containing their work. In the latter case, the use of the real name (if you know it) is probably not appropriate. Real names will usually be removed on request from the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
:The same thing goes for real life pictures. If you know, or have reason to believe that someone would not want their picture on WikiFur, it is probably best not to put it here. On the other hand, many people do not mind, and it can be a useful means of identification.&lt;br /&gt;
:Don't really have an opinion on the last. If you think doing so would make a better encyclopedia, you should do so. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:24, 29 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I made the changes. I'd like to ask you some things about the [[sexual preference]] page.&lt;br /&gt;
*I wrote a snippet saying that some people think that sexual orientation is an artificial construct and does not really exist. But I don't know of any furries advocating that position besides the one person that I linked.&lt;br /&gt;
*I altered the colors on the table so it has the holistic, ying-yang style of intermixed pink and blue. I tried to lighten the colors a lot compared to my first try at it. How does it look now?&lt;br /&gt;
*I wrote a section saying that a cordial split exists among Christian furs between those who believe homosexuality is immoral and those who disagree. Is this accurate? Or do all (or nearly all) of the Christian furries accept homosexuality? The only anti-gay-marriage furry that I know of is [[Prince Jeremy]].*&lt;br /&gt;
*I'd like to find citations for the theories saying ''since having a [[non-furry]] significant other and raising children may result in a fan having less time and money to devote to the fandom, gays are over-represented because they are less likely to be raising children'' and ''Others guess that gays are not over-represented, but that they are simply much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow fans than they are in other areas of their life.''&lt;br /&gt;
*One other theory is that the demographics of the fandom is reasonably close to the general population. It just happens that people who become furries (a 'coming out' of sorts) become more exposed to alternate lifestyles (which might result in a paralell 'coming out'). I considered adding this to the article, but I didn't because it seems overly speculative.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 07:32, 31 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;Based on his infamous &amp;quot;you all belong in concentration camps&amp;quot; comment. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 23:44, 31 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have made [http://furry.wikia.com/index.php?title=Sexual_preference&amp;amp;diff=177377&amp;amp;oldid=177376 further edits]. Some general points:&lt;br /&gt;
:*If you are intending to move one page to another title, use the Move tab at the top rather than cut and pasting. Doing the latter breaks the edit history, and deprives others of the credit for their prior edits, which is required for [[WikiFur:Copyrights|GFDL]] compliance.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Link to Wikipedia by using &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Article name|text to display]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Per the [[WikiFur:Furry Book of Style|style guide]], only the first word of titles should be capitalized unless the word would normally be capitalized (like a name).&lt;br /&gt;
:*Use a spellchecker. :-) If you use a [http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-beta.html recent beta of Firefox] it will have one built in.&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer your questions:&lt;br /&gt;
:*The table looks fine to me.&lt;br /&gt;
:*I suspect there are some who are less than enthused about it, but I do not know for sure. You could always ask the community of Christian furs (or see if the question has been asked already). Jeremy would be an outlier for most purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
:*I'm not sure you can really get a citation for that, but you could give examples of involvement in such activities. For example, very significant proportions of the leadership at [[convention]]s and other furry events are gay, including key members of (at least) [[List of conventions by attendance|the top five event by attendance]], as well as the larger ones overseas. I should note that leadership in this area is not exclusive - as far as I know, there is no &amp;quot;anti-breeder&amp;quot; bias - but if you look closely it is a very clear trend. It might be because gay community members are more interested in organizing communal events. I don't know.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Possible. I think the current situation is a combination of this effect and others. Again, more research is required. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I apologize for messing up the move (I only did it once before in my Wikipedia days). I didn't realize how to use the Wikilink code until I was about halfway through editing the page; I'll use it the correct way in the future.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''I suspect there are some who are less than enthused about it, but I do not know for sure. You could always ask the community of Christian furs'' I've read a lot of furries' livejournals but I don't have one myself (and- to be honest with you- I really do not want one, especially after reading several &amp;quot;if I see him again, I'll rip his f*cking throat out&amp;quot; posts.) Has [[Kendricks]] been editing on Wikifur recently? Could I ask him on his talk page?&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''Jeremy would be an outlier for most purposes.'' I don't know what you mean by &amp;quot;outlier&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''as far as I know, there is no &amp;quot;anti-breeder&amp;quot; bias - but if you look closely it is a very clear trend'' I don't know what &amp;quot;anti-breeder&amp;quot; means. I'm a compete noob, so I don't know the furry lexicon (Please resist the urge to choke my neck with your mind as you type your response).&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''Possible. I think the current situation is a combination of this effect and others. Again, more research is required.'' I see. I think the [[Sexual_preference#Theories|theories section]] does a good job of describing every viewpoint. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 23:15, 1 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::*I edited the page so that the praises and criticisms of the Kinsey reports now have exact citations. The only major omission that I can still see is that the article doesn't talk about transgender furries (and/or furries with fursonas of the opposite gender)- but I don't know if this should be mentioned at all. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 00:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::*No worries about the formatting/move issues, we're all learning here. :-)&lt;br /&gt;
::::*An [[Wikipedia:outlier|outlier]] is a data point which does not &amp;quot;fit the curve&amp;quot; (and which is typically discarded)&lt;br /&gt;
::::*&amp;quot;[[Wikipedia:breeder (slang)|Breeder]]&amp;quot; is slang term used by some homosexuals for heterosexuals, and by some &amp;quot;child-free&amp;quot; couples who dislike children in general for all parents. I intended more the former than the latter, although there have been one or two comments that suggest that a minority of the general furry population disagree with the idea of bringing children to conventions. The bit about the &amp;quot;trend&amp;quot; was not intended to apply to that part of the sentence, but the previous line.&lt;br /&gt;
::::*The issue of gender ''identity'' (as opposed to sexual preference) probably deserves coverage, but perhaps not on that page, as it is a different issue. There are individuals in the fandom who exhibit trans-gender behaviour, from the level of experimenting with roleplaying characters (changing gender along with species is a relatively small step) to considering full-blown gender reassignment therapy. My belief is that this are is largely male-to-female, but I could not even hazard a figure (the fact that the fandom is largely male skews this, of course). --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:13, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I agree that gender as an identity is a topic for a seperate page. As far as the [[Christian furs]] topic goes, I don't really know who to ask (or if I can ask, since I don't have an LJ). [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 01:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Furry_fandom</id>
		<title>Furry fandom</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Furry_fandom"/>
				<updated>2008-01-03T01:14:36Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* Sexuality */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{merge|History}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Furry fandom''' (also known as '''Furrydom''', '''Furridom''', '''Fur Fandom''' or '''Furdom''') refers to the ''[http://www.thefreedictionary.com/fandom fandom]'' for the ''[http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/guides/guide-display/-/1EKGG0RXMUDYH/104-6800273-7092718 furry genre]'' of literature, art and entertainment. Furry fandom is also used to refer to the community of [[artist]]s, [[writer]]s, [[role play]]ers and general fans of the furry art forms who gather on the net and at [[convention]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the furry fandom, known as ''[[furry fan]]s'', ''furries'', or ''furs'', particularly enjoy media that includes fictional [[anthropomorphic]] [[animal]] characters with [[human]] personalities and characteristics. Examples of anthropomorphic attributes include exhibiting human intelligence and facial expressions, the ability to speak, walking on two legs, and wearing clothing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Characters that [[morph]] between human and animal form are also considered by some to be part of the genre. Even certain superheroes with animal derived powers are considered of furry interest by some fans. The general idea being a combination of human and animal attributes, for which there is no documented science regarding what degrees of mixture are required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even [http://members.aol.com/horemheb/josie.htm Josie And The Pussycats] are considered of interest to furry fandom, though the characters only wear costumes with animal ears and [[tail]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.xydexx.com/anthrofurry/furries.htm Invasion of the Furries] - Description of furry fandom with Josie And The Pussy Cats reference.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
=The furry genre=&lt;br /&gt;
==Definition==&lt;br /&gt;
The furry genre (sometimes referred to as a meta-genre) is based on the ''idea'' of [[fantasy]] animal characters, rather than any one type of fiction. Any title in any form of media can be considered relative to the furry genre simply by having a fantasy animal character in it. Such characters are most often seen in cartoons, [[comic]]s, [[science fiction]], allegorical novels, Gothic [[horror]] movies, commercials and [[video game]]s. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Outside the fandom, the most common term used to describe such characters is ''anthropomorphic'' (a word derived from the Greek; ''Anthropos Morphe'', literally meaning ''Human Form''). Those within the fandom prefer the term ''furry'' - hence the name ''furry fandom''. Other terms for these types of characters are ''[[funny animal]]'', ''[[talking animal]]'', or ''[[kemono]]'' in Japan, although each of these has subtle differences in meaning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See: [[Furry_fandom#Defining_the_genre|Defining the genre]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History of the Furry Fandom ==&lt;br /&gt;
:''See main article: [[History]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the earlier days of the Furry Fandom, fans used to gather mostly at [[science fiction]], [[fantasy]], and comic conventions before the [[furry parties]] broke out into full-fledged [[furry]] conventions. The fandom for furry characters traces its organization back to a science fiction convention in 1980,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''[http://www.arclight.net/~yarf/YARF_Chronology.html Yarf Chronology Of Furry Fandom]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when a drawing of a character from [[Steve Gallacci]]’s Albedo started a discussion of anthropomorphic characters in science fiction novels, spawning a discussion group that met at various science fiction and comics conventions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the Internet became more accessible, it became the most popular means for furry fans to keep in touch and share their artistic efforts. This gained the fandom higher visibility and it began to grow rapidly. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Virtual environments, such as [[MUD|MUCK]]s, soon became the most popular places on the net for furry fans to meet and communicate. One of the oldest and largest MUCKs in existence is [[FurryMUCK]]. One of the newest virtual environments to attract furry fans is [[Second Life]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Near the beginning of the 80’s, the furry genre enjoyed the first explosion of popularity it had seen since the 1930’s. Furry characters littered the animation world as well as toy stores. But there was also adult furry entertainment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, those furry fans who have discovered the large concentration of fellow fans on the net have joined with them to create the virtual society that is the collective furry community. Other furry fans, particularly the computer illiterate, remain isolated in their interest with little to no awareness that there is an organized community for fans of the furry genre.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cleanup}}&lt;br /&gt;
Characters and titles that contain characters who may be considered relative to the fandom for furry genre may include the following, among many others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''From classic comic strips:'''&lt;br /&gt;
[[Snoopy]] &amp;amp; [[Woodstock]], [[Garfield]], [[Rupert Bear]], [[Krazy Kat]], [[Pogo]], [[Fix &amp;amp; Foxi]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''From classic cartoons:'''&lt;br /&gt;
[[Mickey Mouse]], [[Bugs Bunny]], [[Felix the Cat]], [[Mighty Mouse]], [[Andy Panda]], [[Woody Woodpecker]], [[Baby Huey]], [[Donald Duck]], [[Porky Pig]], [[Wile E. Coyote]], [[Tom &amp;amp; Jerry]], [[Super Snooper &amp;amp; Blabber Mouse]], [[Yogi Bear]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''From television animation:''' ''see category: [[:Category:Television series|Television series]]''&lt;br /&gt;
[[My Little Pony]], [[Rocky and Bullwinkle]], [[Monchichis]], [[The Get Along Gang]], [[Care Bears]], [[Shirt Tails]], [[The Puppy’s Great Adventures]], [[Popples]], [[Sylvanian Families]], [[Pound Puppies]], [[Chip 'n Dale Rescue Rangers]], [[Father Of The Pride]], [[The Angry Beavers]], [[Rocko's Modern Life]], [[SWAT Kats]], [[Heathcliff and The Catillac Cats]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''From commercials:'''&lt;br /&gt;
[[Tony the Tiger]], [[The Trix Rabbit]], [[The Exxon Tiger]], [[The Geico Gecko]], [[The Taco Bell Dog]], [[Chuck E. Cheese]], [[Charlie Tuna]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''From feature animation:''' ''see category: [[:Category:Movies|Movies]]''&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bambi]], [[Lady and the Tramp]], [[Charlotte's Web]], [[Watership Down]], [[The Secret of NIMH]], [[The Plague Dogs]], [[The Last Unicorn]], [[The Flight of Dragons]], [[Robin Hood|Disney’s Robin Hood]], [[The Fox and the Hound]], [[The Lion King]], [[Madagascar]], [[The Wild]], [[Over The Hedge]], [[Who Framed Roger Rabbit]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''From novels:''' ''see category: [[:Category:Novels|Novels]]''&lt;br /&gt;
[[Jonathan Livingston Seagull]], [[The Little Prince]], [[Redwall]], [[Spellsinger]], [[The Apprentice Adept]], [[Xanth]], [[Alice In Wonderland]], [[The Wizard Of Oz]], [[The Jungle Book]], [[The Chronicles Of Narnia]], [[The Island Of Dr. Moreau]], [[Animal Farm]], [[Sirius]], [[Miss Bianca]], [[Tailchaser’s Song]], [[Breed to Come]], [[The Moreau series]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''From anime:''' ''see category: [[:Category:Anime|Anime]]''&lt;br /&gt;
Luna &amp;amp; Artimas from [[Wikipedia:Sailor Moon|Sailor Moon]], Ryo-okki from [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenchi_Muyo! Tenchi Muyo!], [[Unico]], [[Hello Kitty]], [[Amazing 3]], [[Kimba The White Lion]], [[Dragon Half]], [[Wikipedia:Slayers|Slayers]], [[Bagi]], [[Pokemon]], [[Digimon]], [[Tokyo Mew Mew]], [[Samurai Pizza Cats]], [[Angel's Tail]], [[Ko Century Beastketteers]], [[Di Gi Charat]], [[Super Pig]], [[Ranma ½]], [[Cat Girl Nuku Nuku]], [[Yu Yu Hakusho]], [[My Neighbor Totoro]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''From video games:''' ''see category: [[:Category:Video games|Video games]]''&lt;br /&gt;
[[Darkstalkers]], [[Sonic the Hedgehog]], [[Final Fantasy X]], [[Star Fox]], [[RuneQuest]], [[EverQuest]], [[Jazz Jackrabbit]], [[Conker's Bad Fur Day]], [[Animal Crossing]], [[Ōkami]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''From old time radio:'''&lt;br /&gt;
[[The Cinnamon Bear]], [[Smiling Ed’s Buster Brown Gang]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''From gothic horror:'''&lt;br /&gt;
[[Dracula]], [[The Wolfman]], [[Cat People]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''From live action television:'''&lt;br /&gt;
[[Dark Shadows]], [[Wikipedia:Doctor Who|Doctor Who]], [[ALF]], [[Mr. Ed]], [[Muppets]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''From live action films:'''&lt;br /&gt;
[[Star Wars]], [[Planet Of The Apes]], [[Ladyhawke]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''From the stage:''' ''see category: [[:Category:Theatrical productions|Theatrical productions]]''&lt;br /&gt;
[[Cats]], [[The Cunning Little Vixen]], [[Swan Lake]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''From classic comic books:'''&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atomic Mouse]], [[Atomic Rabbit]], [[Fawcetts Funny Animals]], [[Frisky Fables]], [[Cerebus]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''From modern age comics:''' ''see category: [[:Category:Comics|Comics]]''&lt;br /&gt;
[[Albedo]], [[Batman]], [[Buster the Amazing Bear]], [[Cutey Bunny]], [[Critters]], [[Elfquest]], [[Fritz the Cat]], [[Furrlough]], [[Genus]], [[Gold Digger]], [[Hepcats]], [[Howard the Duck]], [[Maus]], [[Ninja High School]], [[Omaha The Cat Dancer]], [[Rat Bastard]], [[Shanda The Panda]], [[Spiderman]], [[Tank Vixens]], [[Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles]], [[Usagi Yojimbo]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''From flash animation:'''&lt;br /&gt;
[[Foamy the Squirrel]], [[Bonzai Bunny]], [[Happy Tree Friends]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''From net comic strips:'''&lt;br /&gt;
[[Newshounds]], [[Boomer Express]], [[The Suburban Jungle]], [[Kevin and Kell]], [[Faux Pas]], [[Namir Deiter]], [[Last Resort]], [[Sabrina Online]], [[Dan and Mab's Furry Adventures]], [[VG Cats]], [[Better Days]], [[Ozy and Millie]], [[Tales of the Questor]], [[Umlaut House]], [[Freefall]], [[Supermegatopia]], [[Las Lindas]], [[A Doemain Of Their Own]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=The Furry community=&lt;br /&gt;
: ''See article: [[Social order|Social order (of Furry fandom)]]''&lt;br /&gt;
The furry community, referred to by many as furry fandom, or just the fandom, is the virtual universe inhabited by all those who refer to themselves as &amp;quot;Furries.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is a separate entity from what many fans of furry entertainment mean when they use the term furry fandom. To a traditional furry fan, furry fandom means fans of furry characters, period. But the community encompasses a great deal more than just the fandom for furry characters. It includes elements of religion, lifestyle and philosophy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Furriness&amp;quot; is the action of doing anything related to the furry character of a person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Furry lifestyle==&lt;br /&gt;
: ''See article: [[Furry lifestyle]]''&lt;br /&gt;
The most commonly stated interest cited among members of the community, other than an enjoyment of furry entertainment, is a sense some may have of personally identifying with a certain kind of animal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a relatively common aspect of human nature. Many people may feel an affinity for a certain type of animal. Marketers of collectibles have been creating products for people with such feelings for generations. Though it has rarely been something one had an open atmosphere in which to explore and get more deeply in touch with. The furry community, through its many virtual role play environments, provides this avenue for exploration into why certain people feel their particular affinity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some may view animals with a kind of religious reverence reminiscent of [[Buddhism]], [[Shamanism]] or [[Otherkin]]. They may feel that they are the reincarnation of an animal, or that an animal spirit watches over them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Creativity==&lt;br /&gt;
Because the furry genre is widely considered to be a children’s market, there is a considerable lack of furry entertainment specifically geared to adult aged audiences. The community of mostly adult aged furry fans that has formed around the genre is particularly dedicated to filling the need for such products through fan creativity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Content available from furry fans on the internet and at conventions covers a wide range of interests, including all manner of fantasy, philosophy, sex, politics, religion and lifestyle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The genre is considered to be so versatile that it can extend into just about any form of creativity, from things as simple as recipe books with anthropomorphic illustrations &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ozfoxes.com/cat3.htm Sweet Treats] - an example of a furry cookbook.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to technical creations as complicated as interactive furry companions for your desktop.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxee.net/ Foxee] - example of an interactive character.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Other forms of furry craftsmanship include the creation of ''flash animation'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.illwillpress.com/ Foamy The Squirrel] - example of a flash animation character.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and [[fursuits]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But by far the most prolific output of furry fandom is artwork. Furry artwork produced by the fandom ranges from basic cartooning to highly detailed works fit for hanging in galleries. Furry artists also create a wide variety of comic strips. The subject matter of this artwork being as flexible as any other area of the furry arts, ranging from innocent depictions of cute furry character suitable for all ages, to mature works that are age restricted. There is also some writing in the furry fandom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sociability==&lt;br /&gt;
Others may join the furry community simply because it is a free environment where one can form friendships without the normal social problems of having to hide one’s sexual orientation. It is also a place where some may come to find compassionate understanding and assistance with personal problems. The furry community prides itself on a concept of open mindedness and tolerance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Fetishes==&lt;br /&gt;
: ''See article: [[Fetish]]''&lt;br /&gt;
The furry community also attracts furry related fetishists who warm to the non-condemning atmosphere and the ability to express fantasies of a sexual nature that would rarely be tolerated anywhere else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surveys place the number of extreme fetishists in the community at a comparatively low percentage, though the few there are tend to be extremely visible on the net.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Creativity beyond the furry genre==&lt;br /&gt;
Some creative members of the community create works that are not furry of nature. [[2, The Ranting Gryphon]] creates rants on real world politics and the state of human society. A number of furry musical groups produce music without furry subject matter. Some furry online radio stations play popular music that rarely has furry subject matter. And some amateur film makers in the fandom create films that have no visible furry themes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This sometimes brings the community unexpected positive attention, though it further confuses people as to just what the furry fandom is supposed to be about.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Furry controversies=&lt;br /&gt;
==Defining the genre==&lt;br /&gt;
: ''See article: [[What is Furry?]]''&lt;br /&gt;
Historically, very little has been written about the concept of furry as a genre of entertainment. And the community itself sometimes has difficulty getting a grip on what the main object of the fandom is supposed to be. Consequently, some prominent members of the community may express ideas of limitation based on their personal taste in anthropomorphics. Others may feel that their taste in anthropomorphics are excluded by such limitations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are no written rules as to what types or levels of human and animal attributes are necessary for inclusion in the genre. The only noticeable defining factor seems to be that there be some kind of combination of the two. Thus, it is best to approach the genre with the broadest possible view, rather than being influenced by individuals expressing dissatisfaction with areas of the furry arts they personally don’t like.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.tigerden.com/infopage/furry/furfaq.txt an Alt.Fan.Furry Frequently-Asked-Questions Sheet]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://groups.google.com/group/alt.lifestyle.furry/browse_thread/thread/8c31993554a1ac6f/0ecb9c5ccfe2288a alt.lifestyle.furry - FAQ]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.geocities.com/thehalflifecoder/Rants/Furry.html Furry FAQ: State of the Fandom]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Misinformation==&lt;br /&gt;
Many people misunderstand the fandom due to a lack of non-prejudicial information being available. In many cases, the first things outsiders see of the fandom is sensationalistic [[List of media links|fiction on TV shows]]. Others may take note of the adult themed art on the net and assume this is the whole point of the fandom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sexuality==&lt;br /&gt;
The free atmosphere of acceptance in the furry community makes it far more likely for members to be open about their [[sexual preferences]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Sociology of Furry Fandom]. Retrieved October 19, 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As such, most [[non-furries]] believe that nearly all furry fans are [[gay]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Recent surveys suggest that the percentage of homosexuals and bisexuals in the fandom [[Sexual_preference#Why_does_it_seem_that_many_furries_are_homosexual_or_bisexual.3F|may be higher than in the general population]]. Furries have proposed [[Sexual_preference#Theories|various theories]] for this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Confessions of more unusual sexuality and lifestyle have also been noted in the furry community, and though the majority of furry fans will attempt to be tolerant, certain sexual practices will stretch the tolerance of certain furry fans to the breaking point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In particular, discussion of [[bestiality]] is a trigger for angry debate within the community. Many insist that absolute tolerance must be absolute, while others resent the association of the fandom with a practice that is not only illegal in many places, but is considered by many to be a form of animal abuse. Because of these two hallmarks of the current fandom - tolerance and the protection of real life animals - acceptance of bestialitists is a hotly contested topic of the furry community. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another practice that sparks controversy from within the fandom itself is [[plushophilia]]. Though plushophilia is physically harmless, being confronted with it causes extreme reactions on both sides of the issue within the fandom - from total acceptance to outright disgust.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Erotic furry art===&lt;br /&gt;
: ''See article: [[Furotica]]''&lt;br /&gt;
If one looks on games like [[Star Fox]] and movies like [[Over The Hedge]] as the main furry genre, and the erotic art coming out of the community as a parody of the main genre, a direct parallel to [[Wikipedia:anime|anime]] and [[Wikipedia:hentai|hentai]] can be seen as well as a parallel with the general fantasy genre and erotic fantasy art. Types of hentai might staddle both furry and non-furry genre.  The major difference is that the output of furry titles by major companies is relatively small when compared to the output of other genres. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus it is easy to mistake the mature art aspect of furry fandom for being more prominent than in other fandoms. When, in reality, the amount of erotic content coming out of the furry community pales in comparison to the anime/manga erotic output, which is much better organized and even supported by the main industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anime fans enjoy the availability of endless hours of erotic animation created by professional companies, and even the erotic manga comics created by anime fans display a level of professionalism that furry artists can not even begin to aspire to. Yet, this tends to not be a problem for anime fandom, as the high output of non-erotic anime keeps the erotic subgenre in perspective as parody. While with furry fandom, it is highly likely that the first output of the fandom an outsider will see will be something of an erotic nature or sexual humor art.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&amp;amp;q=furries&amp;amp;btnG=Search+Images&amp;amp;gbv=2 A Google Images search for &amp;quot;furries&amp;quot; generates] [[furotica]] as its inital results.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Fringe segments of the community==&lt;br /&gt;
Just about anyone with any kind of interest that can somehow be tied to furry can set up a new neighborhood in the furry community for that interest. For some reason, the furries who create these neighborhoods have a tendency to give them names that sound worse than the actual intent, and thus may generate prejudice or attract the wrong kind of attention.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Babyfurs]] are interested in furry child characters.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nazi Furs]] are interested in furry World War 2 characters.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Postfurry]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Furry hate groups==&lt;br /&gt;
: ''See article: [[Anti-furries]]''&lt;br /&gt;
Furry hate groups have been created that ridicule the fandom at every opportunity and continue the spread of various types of misinformation, largely based on overplaying activities that exist in the fringe areas of the community and have no direct relationship to the fandom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is the general assertion of fans that these hate groups are mistaken in their assumption that furry fandom is all about sexualizing animal characters and animal related fetishes. It has also been confessed by certain furry haters that they attack furry fandom, not out of any belief that the furry fandom is any worse than other fandoms in these respects, but rather because it is much easier to get an entertaining reaction out of furries than it is to get a reaction out of [[Wikipedia:Star_Trek_fandom|Trekkies]] or [[Wikipedia:Otaku|Otaku]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, the anti-furry movement exists largely for entertainment value and should be taken with a grain of salt. Furries may even be seen to play along with furry hate groups, as some furries insist that it is important to maintain a sense of humor about such things. Indeed, there is hardly a fandom in existence that does not parody and laugh at its own idiosyncrasies and stereotypes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Self criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
The furry community also is sometimes criticized by its own for being too tolerant of various things, especially the over visibility of controversial fetishes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Particularly for those who are only in the community because of an interest in furry cartoons, it may be found painful that the community feels free to associate them with things that seem completely unrelated to a fandom for furry characters. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other furries will then turn on those who claim not to want to be associated with every controversial element in the community and accuse them of being a detriment to the stability of the community, often accompanied with accusations of Nazi behavior or being a [[Burned Fur]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the years many furries have [[Leave The Fandom|left the fandom]] in a state of grief over such controversies and disputes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Unsympathetic media==&lt;br /&gt;
: ''See article: [[Timeline of media coverage]]''&lt;br /&gt;
In years past, the only value the mainstream media has seen in furry fandom has been over emphasis on the fetishists and lifestylers within the community. Many of those who were interviewed for such media portrayals claim they were deliberately misquoted. As a result, misunderstanding of the nature of the fandom has been widespread. However, this appears to be changing, as less sensational media sources are starting to take note of the community, which are more inclined to see interest in the fandom aspect. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thepittsburghchannel.com/news/9383594/detail.html Furries Descend On Golden Triangle] - example of more favorable press coverage.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Furry politics==&lt;br /&gt;
As with any type of community, even a virtual one, political issues will arise and certain people will champion them, attempting to attain a measure of power and control over the rest of the community. However, the community is seldom able to be united on any single issue. And most attempts to force change fall flat. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Political topics in the community can revolve around pushing tolerance for controversial segments of the community, people trying to put limits on the genre celebrated by the fandom, and those who wish to completely separate the furry community from any relationship with the mainstream entertainment industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A typical example of furry politics is the attempt to draw a distinction between a &amp;quot;furry comic&amp;quot; created by self professed members of the fandom, and a traditional &amp;quot;funny animal comic,&amp;quot; created by someone who has not acknowledged a connection to the fandom. This type of political ploy may cause a lot of heated debate, but in the end there is no artistic difference between the two, and furry fans rarely stop to ask an artist’s affiliations before enjoying his work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= References =&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= See also =&lt;br /&gt;
* [[History|History (of Furry fandom)]] (to be merged)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Furry]] - explanation of the word &amp;quot;Furry&amp;quot; (to be merged)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wikipedia:Furry fandom|Furry fandom]] at Wikipedia&lt;br /&gt;
* [[How To Be a Furry]] - an ironic but often accurate critique of furry fandom, by [[Jonn Wood]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=External links=&lt;br /&gt;
{{Spoken box|Furry fandom-WikiFur-Revision 85060.ogg|2006-09-07}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.fortunecity.com/tatooine/niven/142/profiles/pro46.html# Funny Animal Comics] — An explanation of anthropomorphic animals as a genre &lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.tigerden.com/infopage/furry/index.html PeterCat's Furry InfoPage] — Repository for FAQs, lists, periodic postings &lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.flayrah.com/ Flayrah Furry News Portal] — Current news of interest to Furry Fandom &lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.vexen.co.uk/human/furry.html The Furry Subculture] — Information on furry fandom along with links to various pages&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Sociology of Furry Fandom] written and researched by [[David J. Rust]]; a member of both SF Fandom and Furry Fandom &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[cs:furry_fandom]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation</id>
		<title>Sexual orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-03T00:59:03Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''This page is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Orphan orphaned] since few other WikiFur articles link to it. [http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/WikiFur:About You can help!]'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gay_flag.png|right|thumb|150px|The rainbow flag associated with [[wikipedia:homosexuality|homosexuality]] in and out of the [[furry fandom|fandom]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sexual preference''' describes the gender or genders that someone feels sexually attracted to. The term [[wikipedia:Sexual_orientation|'''sexual orientation''']] is often used interchangably, but the term 'sexual preference' is more broad and includes personal attitudes in between the three general categories defined as [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientations]]. [[Wikipedia:Heterosexuality|'''Heterosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the opposite gender. [[Wikipedia:Bisexuality|'''Bisexuality''']] is the sexual attraction to members of both sexes, [[male]] and [[female]]. [[wikipedia:homosexuality|'''Homosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the same gender. '''Gay''' is often used synonymously, although the term generally refers to [[male|male/male]] relationships, as compared with '''lesbian''' for [[female|female/female]] relationships. '''Gay''' is sometimes used to refer to both homosexuals and bisexuals. Some individuals do not express attraction to either gender and are considered '''[[Wikipedia:asexual|asexual]]'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[non-furry|Non-furries]] generally take the position that a significantly larger proportion of the [[furry fandom]] is gay or bisexual compared to the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The studies that have been done suggest that this is true, though not to the large extent that is often suggested.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Furries have suggested various theories for this. A lack of completely reliable survey data exists within both the fandom&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Categorization==&lt;br /&gt;
The current [[Wikipedia:scientific consensus|scientific consensus]] advocated by various social and educational organizations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;such as the [[Wikipedia:American Psychiatric Association|American Psychiatric Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Psychological Association|American Psychological Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Counseling Association|American Counseling Association]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of Social Workers|National Association of Social Workers]], the [[Wikipedia:American Academy of Pediatrics|American Academy of Pediatrics]], the [[Wikipedia:American Association of School Administrators|American Association of School Administrators]], the [[Wikipedia:American Federation of Teachers|American Federation of Teachers]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of School Psychologists|National Association of School Psychologists]], and the [[Wikipedia:National Education Association|National Education Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is that people develop their own permanent, unchangeable [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientation]] within one of the three general categories in their [[Wikipedia:childhood|early childhood]] due to [[Wikipedia:Biology and sexual orientation|a combination of genetic tendencies and their social environment]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/publications/justthefacts.html Just the Facts About Sexual Orientation &amp;amp; Youth: A Primer for Principals, Educators and School Personnel] 1999, American Psychological Association&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minority of researchers, sometimes known as [[Wikipedia:Queer theory|'queer theorists']], believe that the concept of sexual orientations is a [[Wikipedia:social construct|social construct]] and that people naturally exhibit a variety of attractions. Some furries also subscribe to this view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pressedfur.coolfreepages.com/essay/postvixen/index.html &amp;quot;Sitting On the Third Side of the Fence&amp;quot;] by Hannah Kincaid from [[Pressed Fur]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although he did not advocate the social construct theory, [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey]] stated that &amp;quot;[[Males]] do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual... The living world is a [[Wikipedia:continuum|continuum]] in each and every one of its aspects.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-hhscale.html &amp;quot;Kinsey's Heterosexual-Homosexual Rating Scale&amp;quot;] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He postulated a [[Wikipedia:Kinsey Scale|scale]] of sexual preferences from zero to six, zero being exclusively heterosexual.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social attitudes among furries==&lt;br /&gt;
''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], found that &amp;quot;race, religion and sexual orientation (as divisive factors) are simply too minor to attract any real attention&amp;quot; and that furries have &amp;quot;higher tolerance for variety in sexual orientation and activity&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A small yet significant minority of furries self-identify as [[Christian furs|Christian]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Some of them believe in the [[Wikipedia:the bible and homosexuality|traditional Christian view]] that homosexual conduct is immoral and that homosexuals should be [[Wikipedia:celibacy|celibate]]. Other [[Christian furs]] believe that the Bible verses and [[Wikipedia:sacred tradition|sacred traditions]] cited against homosexuality are misinterpreted.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark The furries of 'Rainbow Ark'] [http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark/profile take this view]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Both sides maintain a cordial relationship with each other and try to promote mutual understanding.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; [http://www.gaychristian.net/greatdebate.php This website] summarizes the arguments in the debate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===General surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimates of the incidence of homosexuality in the general population vary greatly, due in part to the lack of reliable survey data and the difficulty in defining [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_orientation sexual orientations].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Retrieved September 28th, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey's]] work ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male|Sexual Behavior in the Human Male]]'' found that &amp;quot;46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or &amp;quot;reacted to&amp;quot; persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives&amp;quot;. In addition, the book stated that &amp;quot;10% of males in the sample were predominantly homosexual between the ages of 16 and 55&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html Research Summary] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Kinsey's book, and its companion ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Female|Sexual Behavior in the Human Female]]'', have received [[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male#Criticism|vocal criticism]] for their findings and methodology.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/reisman.html &amp;quot;Kinsey and the Homosexual Revolution&amp;quot;] by [[Wikipedia: Judith Reisman|Dr. Judith Reisman]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.swlearning.com/quant/kohler/stat/biographical_sketches/bio15.1.html Biography of Statician] [[Wikipedia:John Tukey|John W. Tukey]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:American conservative|American conservative]] [[Wikipedia:magazine|magazine]] ''[[Wikipedia:Human Events|Human Events]]'' calls the Kinsey Report the fourth [http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=7591 Most Harmful Book of the 19th and 20th Centuries].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Catholic Church|Roman Catholic]] [[Wikipedia:Higher education in the United States|educational association]] '''[[Wikipedia:Intercollegiate Studies Institute|The Intercollegiate Studies Institute]]''' called it [http://www.mmisi.org/ir/35_01/50worst.pdf &amp;quot;A pervert's attempt to demonstrate&lt;br /&gt;
that perversion is &amp;quot;statistically&amp;quot;normal&amp;quot;] and the third &amp;quot;Worst Book of the Century&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''[[Wikipedia:The New York Times|The New York Times]]'' called his research &amp;quot;conscientious and comprehensive&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pomeroy, Wardell (1972). Dr. Kinsey and the Institute for Sex Research. New York: Harper &amp;amp; Row.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Professor [[Wikipedia:Martin Duberman|Martin Duberman]] called it &amp;quot;skillful&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;a monumental endeavor&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/publications/duberman.html Book review of] '''[http://www.amazon.com/Alfred-C-Kinsey-Public-Private/dp/0393040860 Alfred C. Kinsey : A Public/Private Life]''' originally published in ''[[Wikipedia:The Nation|The Nation]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several recent surveys done in [[Wikipedia:Western world|Western countries]] such as [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]], [[Wikipedia:Australia|Australia]], and the [[Wikipedia:United States|United States]] typically define between 1% and 10% of the general population, which an average around 5%, as homosexual or bisexual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Accessed December 31, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The British government conducted a country-wide survey in 2005 as part of the [[Wikipedia:Civil_Partnership_Act_2004|''Civil Partnership Act'']]. This study, the only official government study of its kind, stated that 6% of the [[Wikipedia:United Kingdom|United Kingdom]] would be interested in forming a [[Wikipedia:civil union|civil union]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nihe.gov.uk/publications/consultation_documents/Draft%20Policy%20Statement%20on%20SO%20Dec06.pdf Sexual Orientation Policy Statement Draft for Consultation] (pdf)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fandom surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are multiple estimates of the percentage of gays in the furry fandom. It is often thought within the fandom that the number is high, possibly as high as 90%,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; but polls have shown differences in estimation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A 2007 [[Wikipedia:University of California, Davis|University of California at Davis]] study found that 37.3% of respondents were bisexual, 32.7% heterosexual, 25.5% homosexual, and 8% were [[Wikipedia:questioning (sexuality)|uncertain]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://studyf3.livejournal.com/1383.html &amp;quot;Furry Survey Results&amp;quot;] from University of California, Davis: Department of Psychology. Published 2007-05-05. Accessed 2007-05-05.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll used in ''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], showed 25% heterosexual, 19% homosexual, and 48% bisexual out of 360 peopled polled.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Sociology of Furry Fandom]. Retrieved October 19, 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rust concluded that &amp;quot;Truth be told, there are many more homosexual members of the fandom than in general society.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll (of indeterminable date, but before 2005) on the [[IFPL]] used the [[Wikipedia:Kinsey scale|Kinsey scale]] to rate the measure of homosexuality in respondents:&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin: 1em 1em 1em 0; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px #aaa solid; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 95%;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #C6E3FF&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 12.9%&lt;br /&gt;
| (63/487)&lt;br /&gt;
| 0 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively heterosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #A7B1EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.3%&lt;br /&gt;
| (89/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 1 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CBABE2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.7%&lt;br /&gt;
| (91/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, more than incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CF71EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 14.8%&lt;br /&gt;
| (72/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| Equally heterosexual and homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #DF99D4&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 11.3% &lt;br /&gt;
| (55/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 4 &lt;br /&gt;
|Predominately homosexual, more than incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #F79FD1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 16.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (78/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 5 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately homosexual, incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #FFB1D8&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 8.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (39/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 6 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively homosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* A 2006 [http://faod.org/ FAOD] poll showed 25% heterosexual, 20% homosexual, and 55% bisexual (out of 44 polled)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://faod.org/index.php?topic=179.0 FAOD Message Board]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furtopia]] poll (open 2003 to present) stated that 53% were heterosexual, 15% gay, and 30% bisexual out of 862 people polled.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://cgi.furtopia.org/cgi-bin/ib311/ikonboard.cgi?s=411086f03c728556d957bd1ffd9b528a;act=ST;f=77;t=9074 Furtopia Message Board] Retrieved September 5, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furry_Survey|poll]] by [[Alex Osaki]] reported that 42.75% were heterosexual, 16.86% were homosexual, 35.29% were bisexual, and 4.71% self-identified as neither.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey.php Furry Poll Results] as of December 30, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Theories===&lt;br /&gt;
One viable theory involves [[Mark Merlino]], a former chair of [[ConFurence]] who co-founded the first furry [[conventions]]. [[Crush Yiff Destroy]] has suggested that Merlino actively recruited alternative lifestylers into the fandom, and that this influences furry demographics to this day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.crushyiffdestroy.com/show/merlino &amp;quot;Journey to the Center of Mark Merlino&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Furries also guess that, since having a [[non-furry]] significant other and raising children may result in a fan having less time and money to devote to the fandom, gays are over-represented because they are less likely to be raising children.{{fact}} Some speculate that the negative [[Wikipedia:social stigma|social stigma]] [[Wikipedia:Furry fandom#Media coverage|attached to the fandom]] keeps away heterosexual [[mundanes]] who would otherwise feel interested. David Rust has stated that &amp;quot;The social variations for Furries may seem unusual from a generic, American viewpoint. However, from the position of a group of people who are already predisposed to enjoying anthropomorphic animals, other concepts such as homosexuality... seem somewhat mundane and unimportant by comparison.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Others guess that gays are not over-represented, but that they are simply much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow fans than they are in other areas of their life.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
One other theory is that the demographics of the fandom is reasonably close to the general population. It just happens that people who become furries, a [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']] of sorts, become more exposed to alternate lifestyles and may reconsider their own sexuality, which might result in a paralell [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']].{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:gay|'Gay']] at [[Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Relationship terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sociology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/User:Boingo</id>
		<title>User:Boingo</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/User:Boingo"/>
				<updated>2008-01-03T00:42:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* About me */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;quot;This is my private bed &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is where I lie at night &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Staring at a light bulb hanging on the ceiling &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waiting for a dream to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
come and get me out of here&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here in my humble room at night&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I often wonder what goes on out there&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
What makes them run so scared &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I often stare at the people passing by &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But they can't see me through my window shades&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Just like I'm not even there&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I know my problems aren't your fault &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I really want to know &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has it always been this way&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If you can find me&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Come and get me out of here&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- ''[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZJHgZX1yQk&amp;amp;NR=1 Private Life]'' by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oingo_Boingo Oingo Boingo] (of [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=universalmusicgroup Universal Media Group]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Info==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Status ===&lt;br /&gt;
The only furry materials I have read so far is [[Immelmann]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Concession]]'' and [[Jay Naylor]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Better Days]]''. I consider both of them to be relatively disturbing. In retrospect, I should have anticipated that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm someone of no particular importance (although I did pretty well on the [[Wikipedia:ACT (examination)|ACT]]) who likes [[Wikipedia:wiki|wiki]] editing (don't ask me why). I have no relation whatsoever to [http://purplelemon.homestead.com/files/decatpics.html 'Purple Lemon'], but more power to him (or her). [http://purplelemon.homestead.com/files/destalk.jpg This Elfman pic just kills me].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I first heard about furries from the infamous [[MTV]] 'Sex2K' episode. I didn't think about it much afterward until some 'unencyclopedia' article lead me to the '[[Pressed Fur]]' website. I looked through that and then eventually stumbled onto here. I recently looked over some of the latest [http://www.hartfordadvocate.com/article.cfm?aid=3873 news] [http://www.memphisflyer.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A10121 articles]. So, it's [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias only just now sunk in] that furries are not... [[stereotype|well, you know]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I once tried to set up a [http://en.wikipedia.org/ Wikipedia] account as [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Revolutionaryluddite 'Revolutionaryluddite'] only to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Missing_Wikipedians#R give up] a few months soon afterward. I recieved a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Barnstars barnstar] for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&amp;amp;limit=500&amp;amp;target=Revolutionaryluddite my contributions], and I was also threatened with banning a couple times. I still make some sporadic edits now and then- most of them music related. The internet's other [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=revolutionaryluddite 'Revolutionaryluddite'] is also me. Make of my eclectic taste in music what you will. [[User:24.32.208.58]] is me as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Name ===&lt;br /&gt;
My [[real life]] name is already being used by a prominent furry ([[User_talk:Boingo|Guess who?]] I'll give you a hint, there's more than one vowel in it). After deciding to create a username based on one of my favorite [[Wikipedia:rock band|bands]], I considered [[wikipedia:Cheap_Trick|Trixie]], [[wikipedia:Ramones|Ramone]], [[wikipedia:Iggy_Pop|Iggy]], [[wikipedia:Thin_Lizzy|Lizzy]], [[wikipedia:Tom_Scholz|Scholz]], [[wikipedia:Def_Leppard|Leppard]], [[wikipedia:Gary_Numan|Numan]], and [[wikipedia:black_crowes|Crowe]]. I picked this because it just sounds/looks good. I suppose that this would make a sweet [[fursona]] name-- [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=boingo+furry it still looks open]-- if I could think of a first name to go with it. Maybe 'Timmy' or 'Johnny'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== About me ===&lt;br /&gt;
When it comes to editing, I like links, single quotes, parenthesis, and citations with multiple links in them (oooh... delicious) and I tend to make a copious amount of spelling and grammar errors (How many can you spot on this page alone?). I wrote a long explanation of my personal beliefs/background/hobbies/whatever on my Wikipedia account for transparency's sake. That was deleted when that account was deleted. Two things that I feel like repeating:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My family is split between [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_American English] [[wikipedia:Fundamentalist_Christianity|Fundamentalist]] [[wikipedia:Lutheran|Lutherans]] (mother's side) and [[wikipedia:Irish_American|Irish]] [[wikipedia:Roman_Catholic_Church|Catholics]] (father's side). Most of them are [[wikipedia:United_States_Democratic_Party|Democrats]]. I self-identify as a [[wikipedia:Evangelicalism|'catholic evangelical']] or [[wikipedia:Evangelical_catholic|'evangelical catholic']].&lt;br /&gt;
*I used to believe in the [[Wikipedia:rapture|rapture]], [[Wikipedia:reparative therapy|reparative therapy]] for [[homosexuals]], and [[Wikipedia:intelligent design|intelligent design]]. I don't anymore, but I'm rather sensitive about it in spite of everything.&lt;br /&gt;
* I used to be a [[wikipedia:Robert_P._Casey|Bob Casey Democrat]] until I jumped ship in fall 2004. I [[wikipedia:Opposition_to_the_2003_Iraq_War#Religious_opposition|strongly opposed the initial invasion of Iraq]], however, I support the [[wikipedia:Iraq_War_troop_surge_of_2007|'surge']] and our continual deployment in the region (See [[wikipedia:Anthony_Zinni|Anthony Zinni]]). Politically, I call myself a [[wikipedia:consistent_life_ethic|'consistent life ethicist']] or a [[wikipedia:One_Nation_Conservative|'one nation conservative']].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's about it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FAQ ===&lt;br /&gt;
'''Revolutionaryluddite'?''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's a reference to the late and great cultural critic [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Postman Neil Postman]. As he has [http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/cyberspace/cyberspace_7-25.html pointed out],&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;If people are getting divorced and mistreating their children and their sexism and racism are blights on our social life, none of that has anything to do with inadequate information. Now, along comes cyberspace and the information superhighway, and everyone seems to have the idea that, ah, here we can do it; if only we can have more access to more information faster and in more diverse forms at long last, we'll be able to solve these problems.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Orientation</id>
		<title>Orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-03T00:35:34Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: Redirecting to Sexual preference&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Sexual preference]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/User_talk:GreenReaper</id>
		<title>User talk:GreenReaper</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/User_talk:GreenReaper"/>
				<updated>2008-01-03T00:31:44Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* These might be stupid questions... */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{User talk:GreenReaper/Header}}&amp;lt;!-- You probably want to add stuff at the bottom of this page --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== ED ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You added a link to the ED article on yourself... to your own page here? &lt;br /&gt;
I don't mean any offense or anything, it's just a little curious, since Encyclopedia Dramatica isn't really the most flattering site to be featured on... - [[User_talk:Saruuk|Saruuk]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No, [http://furry.wikia.com/index.php?title=GreenReaper&amp;amp;diff=144814&amp;amp;oldid=144547 I didn't]. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:09, 16 June 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RBW event status ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Regarding [[User talk:Foxberance#Convention vs. party vs. event]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the main organizer for both the 2007 and 2008 RBW conventions i would like to point out that we ARE a convention.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have in fact a number of specific tracks for fursuiting, spiritual Furs, art, and general entertainment. We also are based at two location. The 'Party' aspect being held on the boat on the Saturday evening along with the more traditional programming being held at the main venue throughout Saturday and Sunday. 2007 and 2008 have specific affiliated hotels to the convention. RBW as of 1st July will be a registered UK charity and LLP As myself (Foxb) and Rapido as the chairmen. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For 2008 we are holding the event at a major and yet to be disclosed venue in London across 4 days. &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:Foxberance|Foxberance]] ([[User talk:Foxberance|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Foxberance|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- [Template:Unsigned] --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'd like to see what other people think of this, so I'll bring it up as a question on the [[Talk:Red Blue &amp;amp; White|appropriate talk page]]. I would note that there is no mention of a hotel on your website, and in fact the only thing it says about accommodation is that it is not provided as part of the registration. The term &amp;quot;track&amp;quot; is also generally used to refer to several things happening simultaneously in different locations rather than one after the other. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:38, 18 June 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Newspaper Articles==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi GR. Just writing wondering if you can clarify the way articles on newspaper pieces should look? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sine has gone and removed the italicization of the title from two entries I put in today: [[Lions and Tigers and Bears, Oh My‎]], [[March of the Furries]]. (I'd originally copied the format from an earlier article about a Denver Westword piece: [[Let's Pretend We're Bunny Rabbits]].)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is Sine's way correct? (It seems to be, I think Sine is using an accepted style, but I thought I'd double-check before spending time going through the list of Media Coverage articles and standardizing them all - there are few in there that italicize the title). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, some articles on newspaper/magazine columns have the &amp;quot;(year) events&amp;quot; category whilst others don't. What's the correct thing here?&lt;br /&gt;
-- [[User:Higgs Raccoon|Higgs Raccoon]] 20:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I would generally agree with this. The titles of newspaper articles are typically encased in quotes if there is a need to offset them from the text. Given that they are already bolded (being the title of the page) this is probably not necessary. We would italicize the name of the publication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's tempting to suggest that we should use [[:Category:News by date]] for this, but it's probably a good idea to keep the two concepts separate. We do have the [[Timeline of media coverage]] for non-furry media. I don't think the date categorization really adds much in this case, so it could be removed (they're not really an event). --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bad Redirect==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello. Using http://www.wikifur.com leads to the page http://furry.wikia.com/wiki , which is a 404 Not Found. Been like this for a few weeks I think, but not before. What's going on, I'm scared! -some furry&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi there! This is due to an upgrade which broke a couple of features, including the redirect from that address. I actually changed the redirect back when I found out this was happening, and it works fine for me, but it may well have been cached at your end. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:35, 24 June 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Greetings From Halopedia! ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Greetings Sentient, The entity Saboteur and the entity Iratus have been been deleted. Make no further Contact, As their memory Matrix are now both mine and currently under Investigation. I am sorry this has caused you problems. Take care. 1707&amp;lt;Umbra&amp;gt;-Security A.I. of Halopedia''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry for that, It's more for effect, anyways, down to buisness. I am aware You had 2 Users by the names of '''Saboteur''' and '''Iratus''', and that they both apparently vandalized pages of your Site. I Regret to inform You that these were both the same Person. And I know exactly who (I cannot say his name due to privacy rights). I work on Halopedia mostly at my school, and as a result, I had a bonehead who watched what I was doing. He did not like me much and as a result, created a account and vandalized my page. When we booted him, he must have moved onto you page and vandalized your files. (As why your Site, He hated anything that was not gangsta or of gangster style and just ran across your site.) I regret all that has happened and hope for the best the damage was minimal(May I ask How bad The Damage Was? He usually like rape,porn and sex related &amp;quot;Stuff&amp;quot;). If you wish to contact me, Leave a message on this site, or more preferably on Halopedia on the Userpage WRAITH as I will likely forget this site and you message! Anyways I lok forward to seeing you in the future and wish you the best of Luck.&lt;br /&gt;
Regards;&lt;br /&gt;
WRAITH-Halopedia Representitive&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== WTF!?!? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You know, you've really demonstrated why I made the right choice to get the hell away from you furries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I posted a warning about a person who vicitimized me, abused me, left me in a horrible financial situation, and even said he plans to kill someone, all of these FACTS, and you accuse me of attacking someone and delete the post, and don't even bother to contact me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What the F*** is the matter with you?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fine, to hell with you if you want to shield Siege, and let him continue to attack other furries.  Your name will go down with a list of many others once Siege is put in jail for felony assault, fraud, domestic abuse and much more and the truth is known, the truth I am trying like hell to get out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can't imagine how pissed off this makes me feel.  Every where I turn, there's Siege, lying, being protected, being allowed to, enabled, to abuse and possibly kill people because people like you can't have the common decency to check things out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why didn't I post proof?  First, I didn't see a way to post images.  Second, I can't legally post Siege's father's phone number.  Third, I can't legally post the name of his employer so that that lie can be verified.  Fourth, what the hell sense does it make for me to post the name and location of the person Siege has threatened to kill?  What are you, f*ing stupid, or do you WANT to see him killed?  Is that the only way you people will see the truth; or will you find some way to blame that on me too?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You know, its bad enough that Siege f*ed me over; took advantage of me, abused me, deprived me of my ability to finish college, much less survive; took away my ability to be financially independent (I'm disabled)...now I have to continue to be victimized by you, Maui, and all the other people who believe a sociopath over a victim.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I want you to do me, and yourself, and the furry community a HUGE f*ing favor.  Try to imagine how I feel, what I&amp;quot;m going through...its quite easy, just pretend in that brain of yours, that what I said was all factual.  If you can do that, if you can imagine what it was like for me, then you will understand how difficult it is to restrain myself from going totally off on you for this. {{unsignedIP|4.242.147.72}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What you posted was an essay, not an encyclopedia article. It was purely intended as an attack on the character of its subject and contained several unsubstantiated statements from your point of view. ''Regardless'' of whether or not it was true (something that none of us could have proved to our own satisfaction from the zero references given), it was not a good article. General policy in this case is to delete unsubstantiated attacks and stick with the bare minimum of facts that we can confirm. As none of it was referenced, the entire article was deleted (by [http://furry.wikia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&amp;amp;type=delete&amp;amp;user=&amp;amp;page=Siegewolf another administrator], I might add - but I do agree with him).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:WikiFur is not the court of Internets justice. Nor is it our job to &amp;quot;check things out&amp;quot;. If you wish to make such statements on WikiFur, it is ''your'' job to provide us with all the sources necessary to do so without risk. If there is a serious problem then you should go to the real world police and talk to them - and any action that they take will provide a series of referencable documents that can be used in the construction of an article, if necessary. If you want to make an assertion of facts that you cannot provide third-party proof for then you should do so on your personal web page or journal. This is not the place for it, any more than an issue of Encyclopedia Brittanica would be the place to announce new research or accuse someone of corruption.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ultimately, we do not wish to be responsible for defaming someone. Unless what you say is true, defamation is exactly what your essay is, and we're not willing to take that risk just on your word. There is a big difference between saying &amp;quot;Person X says this&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;we say this&amp;quot; - and your essay was the latter. If we say bad things about someone, we must take reasonable care to assure their accuracy, and that is why we insist on references in such cases - so that we can attribute accusations and base our own statements on verifiable facts. Without such proof, we risk opening ourselves up to legal liability for publishing statements with reckless disregard as to whether or not they are true. See the bottom of [[Sibe]] for the level of referencing that is considered appropriate. That article is not perfect in other ways, but we are at least reasonably sure that the statements within it are accurate and that we won't get sued for it. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:42, 1 July 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: It seems that he is throwing quite the temper tantrum in his LJ, too. [http://rex-beowulf.livejournal.com/138227.html] [http://rex-beowulf.livejournal.com/138302.html]  --[[User:Dmuth|Douglas Muth]] 03:26, 2 July 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, is there a way we can calmly put some of that information out. Surely, he has screenshots of emails, chat logs and transcripts? - Shadow Hito&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Sure, if he posts them somewhere that we can cite in a reference.  As it is, he's pretty much asking us to take his word for it.  And that just won't fly for that sort of controversial material.  --[[User:Dmuth|Douglas Muth]] 13:17, 2 July 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== WikiFur News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the &amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Talk:Furry_fans_flock_to_Further_Confusion_2007 bashing] the [http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Furry_fans_flock_to_Further_Confusion_2007 last furry convention article]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; received, will you consider posting WikiFur News' reportage of Anthrocon to Wikinews? We're always looking for original reporting, especially from reporters who's writing is as strong and interesting as yours.  --  [[User:Zanimum|Zanimum]] 19:49, 3 July 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Sure, as long as Wikinews doesn't mind it going up here as well. I may decide to condense the end result somewhat for Wikinews, as I plan to make several shorter posts here as ongoing coverage. Others may also be writing about it, but [[WikiFur:WikiFur News|WikiFur News]] is [[WikiFur:Copyrights|dual-licensed CC-BY-2.5]] so there should be no problem with that. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:12, 3 July 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Indeed, stories are [[News:Pittsburgh playwrights pen furry musical, invite Anthrocon attendees to observe reading|already in development]]. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:43, 3 July 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;Just thinking, you have to tell people WikiFur News contributors that any changes they make to your article on this site are co-licensed as CC-BY, not just the normal GFDL.&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; As soon as I typed that, I read about the dual licensing, that's great! I don't know why the Wikia default is GFDL, instead of Creative Commons, GFDL is such a weird license, since you technically have to reprint a whole three-page document with even just a sentence excerpted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Yeah, whatever length or format you'd like.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I've published the article about the play, and tacked on a &amp;quot;in other news&amp;quot; bit from [[News:Anthrocon selects Animal Friends as 2007 charity|this article]], just to highlight the whole charitable element. Thanks!  --  [[User:Zanimum|Zanimum]] 14:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Hi, I've asked the anon on their talk page, about [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fursuit&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=131464305 this edit]. Hopefully they reply.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Great article on the con on Wikinews, I've reworded a little teeny bit here and there, and added a definition of what a fursuit is. (When I posted your play article, people were entirely dumbfounded what a furry is, which is I guess better than the default response so many have.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I've added Lucky Coyote's pic to the fursuit article on Wikipedia. Do you know Blondefoxy to any extent? Presumably she has no qualms against the picture use, however I had asked a few weeks ago if she'd release a picture of Lucky or Lucky + Skuffy(?) under a Creative Commons license for Wikipedia, no reply. I don't want to peave anyone off...  --  [[User:Zanimum|Zanimum]] 16:18, 18 July 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thanks for adding your clarification to &amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Anthrocon_2007_draws_thousands_to_Pittsburgh_for_furry_weekend the article]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;. Sometimes it's hard to know what things do or don't need further explaining in the body text (the article was already very long, so I was hesitant to put in much more exposition). I didn't know you posted the one about the play; I've added that to the related news section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I must admit that I do not know Blondefoxy/[[Lucky Coyote|Lucky]] personally, and indeed I did not know that was another name of hers. Most fursuiters tend to be fairly happy about people showing off their costumes, though, and Lucky was one of those actively participating in group skits and posing for pictures. You could try the other contact details on her [http://bloody-kryptonite.deviantart.com/ deviantART account] if you really want to contact her about it. Oh, and her mate is [[Skuff Coyote]]. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:05, 18 July 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kalika Futago ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The article for [[Kalika Futago]] needs to be renamed [[Kalika Tybera]].  She changed her furry name to reflect her marriage to her mate, Nace Tybera ([[BigKittyWolf]]). --[[User:Kitch|Kitch]] 22:08, 3 July 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Looks like someone was watching. And thank you for your [[WikiFur:Ledger|recent donation]]! The WikiFur account was looking a little low after all of those Anthrocon purchases. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:18, 3 July 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Question from RVDDP2501/possible new article==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey GreenReaper, listen, I'm sorry to bother you. I just found out on the internet about some new comic book from Image Comics called &amp;quot;The Astounding Wolf-Man&amp;quot;, there is a rather small page about it on wikipedia.org. my question is should there be an article about it here as well, I've never asked about making a page here about something on wikipedia before so I'm not sure about my place here in asking this question or if there is even a need to make one, I just thought I'd ask considering the subject matter of the comic since it deals with well a werewolf. I hope I haven't bothered you with my (hopefully not a stupid) question, ok then, see ya and I look forward to your question - [[User:RVDDP2501|RVDDP2501]] 01:57, 4 July 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Tricky question. I'm not sure there is a need, since it doesn't really seem all that furry to me. I could be wrong, but it seems to be more of a classical werewolf/vampire/creatures of the night thing. A reviewer [http://www.ifanboy.com/archive/weblog/ifanboy_preview.html didn't think much of it] on its giveaway in [[Wikipedia:Free Comic Book Day|Free Comic Book Day]]. Here's some [http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=11010 pictures from issue 2]. I'd personally give it a few more issues to see if it turns out to have any kind of a lasting impact, or starts to go beyond the &amp;quot;oh me, oh my, I'm a werewolf, I have super powers to do good and/or evil&amp;quot; genre. But that's just me. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:17, 4 July 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Fair enough, I just thought I'd bring this to your attention :) - [[User:RVDDP2501|RVDDP2501]] 10:06, 4 July 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Image replacement ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can delete [[:Image:Jtw-kitchshorts.jpg]].  It has been replaced. --[[User:Kitch|Kitch]] 22:27, 4 July 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wikipedia Extinctioners Page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey GreenReaper, I was wondering if I could ask your opinion or help on the Wikipedia Extinctioners page. The Page had a second deletion debate and survived but in the process, all links to the Wikifur page were removed, I was wondering what can be done, can a link to the main page be put back in the external links section? there was this huge wikifur link removal thing which I only heard bits and pieces about which I think was envolved with the links being removed. I would really like to put back the link since the wikifur article has much better coverage on the topic but I just don't know if doing so would restart the removal process or threaten my membership with wikipedia. What do you think I should do? Oh, here is the link to the question posted by Labfox - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Extinctioners#Wikifur_Link - [[User:RVDDP2501|RVDDP2501]] 21:26, 6 July 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you think a link is good you should put it back. If it gets taken out again, take it to the talk page. Nobody is going to ban you over that (at least not unless you keep doing it after being told not to by several people :-). --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:04, 14 July 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Request for blanking ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to ask if you could blank the page http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/Alvero&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The thing is written totally by Mitch from Crushyiffdestroy and is all about the time they were harrassing me online, I didn't even know it was on here until today.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Alvero|Alvero]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I will note your request on the [[Talk:Alvero|discussion page]], and if the consensus is to exclude then we will do so. Our general policy is to do so unless there is a good reason not to, and I don't immediately see one here, just a lot of drama over a single issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(For what it's worth, if the story element you disliked had been included maliciously, I don't think the author would have gotten so angry about your accusation.) --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:45, 11 July 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I second this vote &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:71.155.232.212|71.155.232.212]] ([[User talk:71.155.232.212|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/71.155.232.212|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- [Template:Unsigned] --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Umm, it's not really a vote, and it should be discussed [[Talk:Alvero|here]]. :-) --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:56, 11 July 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 6-2-1 rule ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed you removed [http://furry.wikia.com/index.php?title=6-2-1_rule&amp;amp;diff=150527&amp;amp;oldid=150492 this edit], and I was wondering why - do you know it to be false? --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:17, 11 July 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Do we know it to be true? ;) Without a citation or even an edit summary, I'm loathe to assign a single creator to a term based on an anonymous edit. [[User:SpazKitty|Spaz Kitty]] 01:09, 12 July 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, a bit of snooping into recent edits shows that the person named is the creator of the &amp;quot;new&amp;quot; 6-2-1 rule, not the original. The edit I reverted lists him as the creator of the original 6-2-1 rule. [[User:SpazKitty|Spaz Kitty]] 01:13, 12 July 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Source? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First they came for the babyfurs, and I did not speak out, because I was not a babyfur.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then they came for the plushies, and I did not speak out, because I was not a plushie.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then they came for the balloonies, and I did not speak out, because I was not a balloonie.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then they came for me . . . and there was no one left to speak out for me. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where did the line &amp;quot;First they came for... and I did not speak out, because I was not a... Than they came for me...and there was no one left to speak out for me&amp;quot; line come from? [[User:Sirtim|Sirtim]] 12:16, 5 August 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Wikipedia:Martin Niemöller|Martin Niemöller]]. See [[Wikipedia:First they came...]]. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:27, 5 August 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Redirecting for my WIKIA ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello GR i only asking a little question if i want redirecting for my wikia no.wow what should i do? &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:Zizanzu|Zizanzu]] ([[User talk:Zizanzu|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Zizanzu|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- [Template:Unsigned] --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not quite sure what you mean by &amp;quot;redirecting&amp;quot;, other than &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;#REDIRECT [[pagename]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, which you can't usually do interwiki. To link there, use something like &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[w:c:no.wow:Klasse|Klasse]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:11, 7 August 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Request from RVDDP2501 (New Category) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey GreenReaper, I'm sorry to bother you but I was wondering if you maybe able to do something for me, I was wondering if you could create a new category for the extinctioners characters, specifically those who have appeared/debuted in a side comic called &amp;quot;Artic Blue&amp;quot; in the Extinctioners universe. The characters who have or will appear are the [[Extinctioners#Fem_Fatales|Fem Fatales]], [[The Cerberus Brothers]], [[Vincent Blackphox]], [[Reggy Bryghttail]] and a few others who will come later. You can view these comics at the extinctioners website or on Shawntae's art pages at deviantart.com or furaffinity.net. So I guess the name of the category would be called Artic Blue comic characters or something along those lines, thank you and once again, I'm sorry to bother you with this, see ya :) - [[User:RVDDP2501|RVDDP2501]] 13:46, 8 August 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The best title is probably [[:Category:Artic Blue characters]]. You could create that page and put &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[Category:Extinctioners characters]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; inside it, so that it is a subcategory. It is not necessary to have an administrator to do this, anyone can create categories. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:07, 8 August 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for your welcoming me, this is my first time in this kind of encyclopedical sites. - [[User:GatoGris|Gato Gris]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New User on Wiki ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From Wynther Knight&lt;br /&gt;
About LXF&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi there, thanks for letting me know someone is here to help. It's actually my time to do an article on an Wiki and I'm still trying to learn the ropes. Thanks for letting me know about the &amp;quot;show preview&amp;quot; button, as I still have toms of stuff to put in.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you again :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Not Certified = Not Artist?&amp;quot; News==&lt;br /&gt;
Just re-posting what I put in the talk section of that page, in case you didnt check: It's not personal drama any more than the &amp;quot;Krystal Meme&amp;quot;. Trust me, this has effected a LOT of furaffinity members. I added it because I thought people out of the know needed a place to find out what was going on without having to wait for the monstrous page to load, or hear about it from biased, or angered sources. It has already reached LiveJournal and EncyclopediaDramatica, a place I doubt one can find unbiased furry news. It has spawned numerous pictures of its own, but no, lol, it hasnt necessarily caught the newsworthy eye of Vinci and Arty..-- [[User:AnonIhmus|AnonIhmus]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[Usertalk:AnonIhmus|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This matters to a lot of people and affects a lot of people from the site, but whatever..Take it down, I dont give a shit.&lt;br /&gt;
My links did work, btw.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not that it matters, but just fyi- this effected at least a thousand people, not one. I kinda said before it effected a lot of people, not just the journal poster, but people who saw it, people who heard about it and so on...It also made its way into 2 The Ranting Gryphon's show. ~Anon Ihmus&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey GreenReaper, sorry to bother you but I was wondering if I could ask your opinion and help with something, I am in the process of creating a character page for a character who will soon appear in the Extinctioners Artic Blue Webcomic called &amp;quot;Neige Unuulaq (Frostbite)&amp;quot; who was originally created by [[Rei Vegan]], my question is in regards to an image created by Rei Vegan, a model/reference sheet for Frostbite - http://www.furaffinity.net/view/427311/ - Rei Vegan has given me permission to create the character page as well as use this reference sheet in the page but what do I do about the licencing info, do I need to get a licence from wikifur to use art by Rei Vagen? - [[User:RVDDP2501|RVDDP2501]] 03:07, 19 August 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You can upload it and say on the image page that Rei has given WikiFur permission to host the image, as long as Rei has told you that this is the case. If you say on the page that you have acquired a particular permission, we will generally take your word for it. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:22, 19 August 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Speedy Deletion Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it appropriate to mark outdated images of your own fursona for speedy deletion? Thought I'd check before I got myself into trouble ;) --[[User:Tikuko|Tikuko]] 18:25, 2 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No, that's fine. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:31, 2 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As in it's allowed? --[[User:Tikuko|Tikuko]] 18:40, 2 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes. :-) --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:01, 2 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[Wolves' Paradise]] Encyclopedia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Wolves' Paradise has set up a ''[http://wolfbbs.net/wiki/ Paradise Encyclopedia]'' that you can take a look at it. However it's license is CC-by-nd-sa(!) so it is impossible to share content between WPE and WikiFur. --&amp;lt;ruby&amp;gt;&amp;lt;rb lang=&amp;quot;ja&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:NekoYasha|猫夜叉]]&amp;lt;/rb&amp;gt;&amp;lt;rp&amp;gt;「&amp;lt;/rp&amp;gt;&amp;lt;rt style=&amp;quot;font-size:6pt&amp;quot;&amp;gt;NekoYasha&amp;lt;/rt&amp;gt;&amp;lt;rp&amp;gt;」&amp;lt;/rp&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ruby&amp;gt;([[User_talk:NekoYasha|talk]]) 03:33, 3 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tales from the Reservation ==&lt;br /&gt;
Saw what you did on TFTR &amp;amp; AJA pages....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks! :D Now comes the fun part - re-reading and providing a better description of the story(as well as figuring out how to scan it in as a PDF without having each part be over 17MB in size :)) ).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:69.95.242.1|69.95.242.1]] 12:59, 17 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Carpe Diem ==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm flattered that Carpe Diem got the featured comic of the week/day/whatever. I also saw the new page, and was more flattered that someone took the time to do all that. I'll probably be adding to it, but I just wanted to say thanks. It made my day. :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:GraveyardGreg|Graveyard Greg]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
September 25, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No problem, and thanks for your additions. It always helps to get an authoritative source of information involved. :-) --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:33, 27 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== i need help!! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Im trying to post my personal furrie story background and go into detail about my fursona... but ive never done this before on any willi site... IM LOST can u help me?? &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:Roxwood|Roxwood]] ([[User talk:Roxwood|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Roxwood|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- [Template:Unsigned] --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You've got the right page at [[Roxwood]]. I'll go through and tidy things up a bit. :-) --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:29, 28 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HOw exactally would i be able to do that??&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i think im ok for now..... any suggestions please PLEASE enlighten me... im really new at this an appreciate the help&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:My main suggestion is to look at all of the [[help]] pages, both on syntax and on how to write good articles. You might also want to check out some of the [[WikiFur:Featured articles/Complete|featured articles]] to see how good articles are written and presented (click the '''bold''' links on that page for the full articles). Obviously, most articles about people are unlikely to be featured, because there's only so much you can say about one person, but it's a target. :-) --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:48, 28 September 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;See also&amp;quot; Re: &amp;quot;How To Be a Furry&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;''It is a WikiFur article''&amp;quot;. Yes, but don't we follow that &amp;quot;See also&amp;quot;s links should be reserved to &amp;quot;related&amp;quot; Wikifur articles?; In this case, [[Crush! Yiff! Destroy!]], [[LOLfurries]] and [[Furfags.com]] are &amp;quot;related&amp;quot; due to their purpose and function; on the [[Drama]] article, [[Fursecution]] and [[Schadenfreude]] are &amp;quot;related&amp;quot; on the &amp;quot;See also&amp;quot; for their meaning and intent; On the [[Anthropomorphic]] article, etc, etc,..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Right now, [[How To Be a Furry]] is the odd man out on a &amp;quot;See also&amp;quot; that lists related web sites with this type of content, hence the &amp;quot;See also&amp;quot;s directs to '''related''' Wikifur/Wikipedia/Wiki articles and entries only''. Didn't say it was not a Wikifur article, just that needed to be &amp;quot;related.&amp;quot; [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 03:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I placed [[How To Be a Furry]] under CYD's &amp;quot;See Also:&amp;quot; because CYD hosts the main online version of the article, and it's a satire article about furry drama and the [[furry fandom]] in general, which is certainly in CYD's domain. If CYD thought the work fit their motives enough to be hosted on their site, then that's related enough to CYD for my tastes. [[User:Jigsaw Forte|Jigsaw Forte]] 03:29, 9 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::CYD hosts a plethora a articles, images and miscellany in the vein of &amp;quot;How To Be a Furry.&amp;quot; Adding all of them would just cluttered the &amp;quot;See also,&amp;quot; or just having this article listed on the SE, and not the rest would seem to be favoritism. The CYD article could mentioned &amp;quot;How To Be a Furry&amp;quot; on the article itself, as a solution, which I can quickly edit in right now to see how it would look [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 03:37, 9 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Fair enough; CYD article looks fine with it in, and association is still made between the two articles. That should work. [[User:Jigsaw Forte|Jigsaw Forte]] 03:48, 9 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Aye. By the by, not antagonism was intended when I pointed out and made the first edit on your addition, just trying to follow the Wiki's ways of data presentation and formatting (which I still stumble over from time to time) =) [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 03:54, 9 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks for noticing, ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just added a little bit of information to the [[MewYear]] page.&lt;br /&gt;
I might add some more at a later time if some hasn`t done it by then already. &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:O kill|O kill]] ([[User talk:O kill|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/O kill|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- [Template:Unsigned] --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Strange layout issue ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi GreenReaper,&lt;br /&gt;
I've just been tinkering with the [[Furfire]] article which for some very odd and unusual reason was causing the entire Wiki CSS layout to collapse in a rather horrible way (See [http://users.bigpond.net.au/coles/Data/strangelayout.png image]). The strange thing is that it only seems that it only affected the most recent revision of the article despite there being the same markup in the article. (I originally noticed something wrong with [http://furry.wikia.com/index.php?title=Furfire&amp;amp;oldid=167083 rev. 167083] but when I look at it in the history the layout appears to be just fine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bit of markup that I believe to be possibly suspect is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;amp;gt;__TOC__&amp;amp;lt;/div&amp;amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once I removed this it appeared to come good. Does this make any sense to you why this would happen? I even dropped over to IE7 just in case my version of Firefox was on the fritz, but it persisted there too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It looks like it's fixed now - but I still feel that that was really quite odd. -[[User:Composingliger|Composingliger]] 14:39, 19 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is due to a problem with the cached version of such pages when edited by either anonymous users or users with the wikiwyg system turned on, which incorporates additional markup into the page. The root cause is that it encloses things in a span and half of the div is within the span. I had hoped they would have fixed this by now, but it appears not. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:16, 19 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Alright, in that case I guess there's not all that much more that can be done that hasn't already been fixed. Thanks for the clarification. -[[User:Composingliger|Composingliger]] 15:31, 19 October 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Request for complete removal ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Green.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For personal reasons, I wish to have [[Quilrynn]] and all revisions of that article purged from the database and have it protected with the exclusion notice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, I would like [[Moeryl]] to be excluded as well. --[[User:JKM]], 10/27/2007, 11:05 CDT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Name redirects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FYI: I left messages for Spirou to stop reversing the removal of my real name as a pointer to my wikifur entry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See http://drewkitty.livejournal.com/238637.html for verification.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you feel comfortable taking care of this yourself, please do.  I don't have confidence that he will without drama.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- drewkitty(at gmail d0t c0m)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have deleted the redirects concerned. I think it is excessive to blame Spirou for not doing so the first time. Removal of personal information is something we take seriously, but we are going to make reasonably sure that we're talking to the person concerned first. An anonymous edit is not sufficient. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:27, 4 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Timeline of media coverage ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Am I correct in assuming you did not intend to remove all of the pre-2007 material from [[Timeline of media coverage]]? --[[User:Mwalimu|mwalimu]] 13:49, 8 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeep, no. Chalk that up to not checking I was editing the right thing after a browser restart. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:17, 8 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hi! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Uhm hiya. I'm new here to this Wiki, but I have been a furry for a while, and I'm kind of clueless when it comes to Wikis. How do I start off? ^^;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Toshiro Kitteh|Toshiro Kitteh]] 17:21, 12 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi there, Toshiro! Probably the best way is to have a look at the [[help]], including our [[WikiFur:Policies and guidelines|policies and guidelines]], and then read some of the [[WikiFur:Featured articles/Complete|featured articles]] (not just the summaries) to get a good idea of the sort of material that makes a good article. You can click Edit on any of these pages to see how they were put together.&lt;br /&gt;
:After that, consider making a few edits to an article yourself. Some people start by trying to write an article about themselves in the third person (i.e. [[Toshiro Kitteh]]), but it is by no means a requirement. You might just want to use your [[User:Toshiro Kitteh|user page]] to describe yourself more personally - or you might not want to write about yourself at all, but something that interests you. If you want to write about something that doesn't yet have an article, just find or add a link to it in another article, and then click it to start the page (you can also just change the URL, reload, and click edit, but then it might not be linked to anything). Adding to or making corrections to existing articles is just as useful, though. You can find various suggestions on the [[WikiFur:Community Central|Community Central]] page.&lt;br /&gt;
:Let me know if you need any help not already provided. :-) --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:06, 12 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Of interest? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://creativity-online.com/work/view?seed=ccfac9e7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Look at it before the end of the week, when they take it private. Stumbled across it in an ad industry email newsletter, thought I'd drop by, just in case you thought it was worth mentioning in Wikifur.  --  [[User:Zanimum|Zanimum]] 15:33, 20 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hehe, yeah . . . they actually made a [http://www.dailymotion.com/related/3061393/video/x3dei2_orangina_ads whole video out of it] which made the rounds a week or so ago. Perhaps it'll help attract new blood to [[FranFurence]]! ;-) --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:13, 20 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dalhusky the dog here. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, GreenReaper. It has been about three years since I wrote that &amp;quot;Furry Irony&amp;quot; post.&lt;br /&gt;
At this moment, I am somewhat of a different person now than I was when I posted that article. I cannot easily explain what I mean by that. I am a very complicated person.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
But what I am trying to say is that I have been blown away by the fact that so many people like to hate and bash people like me for being aroused by a cartoon picture or a real animal. I have certain [[Zoophilia|likings]] that even many furries detest. I also bailed out of a troll war on YouTube and canceled my MaxSnowDog account in hopes of removing some terrible baggage recently due to my trying to tell people about my beliefs with regards to [[zoophilia]] and getting threats along with a very stupid E.D. article about me. Maybe we could talk together sometime because I would rather chat than post because of the way I'm feeling currently.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sarafina ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to request for removal of http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/Image:Sarafina.jpg as being a personal offensive hoax submitted by some hater. This is not my photo! :( Also i would like to ask you to remove http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/Image:SaffyWowMeSm.jpg as is was a beta-version of some early art posted without my permission thus violating the copyright law. Also the history of http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/Sarafina_(artist) contains a hoax personal information(real name and adress) that is highly offensive to me. Please, purge it from data base. &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:Sarafina(the artist)|Sarafina(the artist)]] ([[User talk:Sarafina(the artist)|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sarafina(the artist)|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- [Template:Unsigned] --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I beleive this is BS. For one thing, real Sarafina does not speak English well enough to know the words &amp;quot;hoax&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;purge&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;violating&amp;quot; (real Russian would use the words &amp;quot;lie&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;delete&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;break&amp;quot; -- these are the words we are taught in schools for the respective verbs.) As sich, I'm gonna protect that page for the time being since somebody seem to be trying to peck on it. -- [[User:Wesha|Wesha]] 16:01, 29 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: P.S. Сарочка, если это реально ты, свяжись со мной по аське и все сделаем - собственно говоря, так и надо было с самого начала. -- [[User:Wesha|Wesha]] 16:06, 29 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't know. The FAQ on [http://fanart.nala.ru/ fanart.nala.ru] is quite sophisticated in the use of English in places, though there are odd parts. I will attempt to email Sarafina at her contact address registered at lionking.org to confirm this. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Don't worry, I have it under control. I now have reports from Russian furry community about certain stir on the topic, so let me figure it all out. What worries me is that she didn't contact me directly for that purpose, so I certainly need to investigate. I should be able to have a conversation with herself in a day or two. -- [[User:Wesha|Wesha]] 16:36, 29 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: OK. The email has been sent anyway. The picture [http://fanart.nala.ru/details.php?image_id=176 does appear to be out of date]. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:58, 29 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Identity was confirmed through email. I have deleted the two images and the history revisions concerned. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:29, 29 November 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Furry sexuality survey==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi there.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was wanting to report a story on WikiFur News, but seeing as how I am one of the people involved with the story, I do not believe I am able to under WikiFur rules.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The story in question is that I have organised a survey to look into furry sexuality - the first survey to look pacificly into this topic. It is reported in ''[http://robomilk.sirkain.net/ft/4/sexuality_survey/ The Furtean Times]''. So far, over 100 people have answered the survey, and granted, a few issues have been brought up. If you want to write up the story or ask me questions about it, please ask me. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:ISD|ISD]] 12:01, 10 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'll try and take a look at this tonight. Sorry for the delay, it's been very busy here at work these last few weeks. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:07, 11 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks for looking. [[User:ISD|ISD]] 21:40, 11 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How do you mess with the colors/shading on a wiki table? I proposed something like that for [[Talk:Homosexuality|this page]]. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 07:49, 27 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Same as on a normal HTML table, except that there are certain limitations to prevent problems (most notably, you can't set an image as a background unless you do so via sitewide CSS). Probably what you would find most useful is the background-color style. Have a look at any HTML tutorial out there and you should find some tips on HTML tables that you can put to use here. You might also find [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Table Help:Table] useful. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:05, 27 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I made my proposed changes. [[Homosexuality|What do you think?]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::(I know it's a bit redundant to post that comment on this page as well, as you are WikiFur's resident omniscient overlord, but whatever) [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 01:27, 28 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thought the colours were a little strong, so I tweaked them so that the text was more readable. You can do unordered lists using * at the front.  --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RBW ==&lt;br /&gt;
Having resolved the previous 2 issues, I've come across another which would be the table that's now in the main [[RBW]] article, that lists 2006-8 and the GoH and staff. Although there are now staff and GoH pages, the links in the table are still directing to the edit section of the categories and I can't figure why. &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;—The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:Axle|Axle]] ([[User talk:Axle|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Axle|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- [Template:Unsigned] --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:It takes a moment for the wiki software to fully update the links - to prevent locking, it does not do so immediately, but defers such actions to spread across page accesses. It is blue now. If in the future you see such problems, try adding ?action=purge to the URL (or &amp;amp;action=purge if a ? is already in the URL). --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:59, 28 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Was just popping back to mention that I may have jumped the gun somewhat, but thanks again for taking the time to respond to my misguided queries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== These might be stupid questions... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
but I still would like to ask:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it always unacceptable to add a link to [[[encyclopedia dramatica]] to a page (Looking something like this: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Aeris A satrical take on the 'Mary Sue' phenomenon]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;), or does it depend on the circumstances?&lt;br /&gt;
*What's the policy on using someone's real, birth-cirtificate listed name in their biographical article?&lt;br /&gt;
*What's the policy on using real life pictures in biographical articles?&lt;br /&gt;
*Since they're so short and they don't really have any prospects for more content, shouldn't the articles '[[bisexual]]' and '[[heterosexual]]' be merged into '[[homosexual]]' to create '[[sexual preference]]'?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 05:03, 29 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:All content decisions are made on a case by case basis. However, ED rarely makes a good link, due to its habit of putting a highly negative spin on any subject that it covers (except for those which result in the glorification of drama). Its editors are also quite willing to make things up if doing so results in &amp;quot;lulz&amp;quot;. For these reasons and others, linking to ED is strongly discouraged, and I would advise you to treat anything you find there with caution. For the specific example you give, there seems no reason not to just use an interwiki link to Wikipedia, which has a perfectly good article on the topic. We would not need to have a separate article as it is not a furry topic.&lt;br /&gt;
:Our policy with birth names is to look at whether or not that name is being concealed in any way. For example, many artists actually go by their real names. Others use fan names alongside their real names. Still others make no mention of their real names, even on the websites containing their work. In the latter case, the use of the real name (if you know it) is probably not appropriate. Real names will usually be removed on request from the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
:The same thing goes for real life pictures. If you know, or have reason to believe that someone would not want their picture on WikiFur, it is probably best not to put it here. On the other hand, many people do not mind, and it can be a useful means of identification.&lt;br /&gt;
:Don't really have an opinion on the last. If you think doing so would make a better encyclopedia, you should do so. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:24, 29 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I made the changes. I'd like to ask you some things about the '[[sexual preference]]' page.&lt;br /&gt;
*I wrote a snippet saying that some people think that sexual orientation is an artificial construct and does not really exist. But I don't know of any furries advocating that position besides the one person that I linked.&lt;br /&gt;
*I altered the colors on the table so it has the holistic, ying-yang style of intermixed pink and blue. I tried to lighten the colors a lot compared to my first try at it. How does it look now?&lt;br /&gt;
*I wrote a section saying that a cordial split exists among Christian furs between those who believe homosexuality is immoral and those who disagree. Is this accurate? Or do all (or nearly all) of the Christian furries accept homosexuality? The only anti-gay-marriage furry that I know of is [[Prince Jeremy]].*&lt;br /&gt;
*I'd like to find citations for the theories saying ''since having a [[non-furry]] significant other and raising children may result in a fan having less time and money to devote to the fandom, gays are over-represented because they are less likely to be raising children'' and ''Others guess that gays are not over-represented, but that they are simply much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow fans than they are in other areas of their life.''&lt;br /&gt;
*One other theory is that the demographics of the fandom is reasonably close to the general population. It just happens that people who become furries (a 'coming out' of sorts) become more exposed to alternate lifestyles (which might result in a paralell 'coming out'). I considered adding this to the article, but I didn't because it seems overly speculative.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 07:32, 31 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;Based on his infamous &amp;quot;you all belong in concentration camps&amp;quot; comment. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 23:44, 31 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have made [http://furry.wikia.com/index.php?title=Sexual_preference&amp;amp;diff=177377&amp;amp;oldid=177376 further edits]. Some general points:&lt;br /&gt;
:*If you are intending to move one page to another title, use the Move tab at the top rather than cut and pasting. Doing the latter breaks the edit history, and deprives others of the credit for their prior edits, which is required for [[WikiFur:Copyrights|GFDL]] compliance.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Link to Wikipedia by using &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Article name|text to display]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Per the [[WikiFur:Furry Book of Style|style guide]], only the first word of titles should be capitalized unless the word would normally be capitalized (like a name).&lt;br /&gt;
:*Use a spellchecker. :-) If you use a [http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-beta.html recent beta of Firefox] it will have one built in.&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer your questions:&lt;br /&gt;
:*The table looks fine to me.&lt;br /&gt;
:*I suspect there are some who are less than enthused about it, but I do not know for sure. You could always ask the community of Christian furs (or see if the question has been asked already). Jeremy would be an outlier for most purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
:*I'm not sure you can really get a citation for that, but you could give examples of involvement in such activities. For example, very significant proportions of the leadership at [[convention]]s and other furry events are gay, including key members of (at least) [[List of conventions by attendance|the top five event by attendance]], as well as the larger ones overseas. I should note that leadership in this area is not exclusive - as far as I know, there is no &amp;quot;anti-breeder&amp;quot; bias - but if you look closely it is a very clear trend. It might be because gay community members are more interested in organizing communal events. I don't know.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Possible. I think the current situation is a combination of this effect and others. Again, more research is required. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:31, 1 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Please see [[User_talk:Boingo|my talk page]]. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 00:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions on redirections, elimination of real name ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was looking though wikifur for my real name and it is all over the place but unlinked to anything.  &lt;br /&gt;
What is the policy of changing that to my character name at every occurrence, really would rather my real name not be seen.--[[User:JBadger|JBadger]] 16:10, 29 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
For now put in a redirection, might leave it like that--[[User:JBadger|JBadger]] 17:22, 29 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:You are free to remove it if you wish, unless the WikiFur community feels otherwise (which is unusual, and unlikely to apply in your situation). --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:30, 29 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/User:Boingo</id>
		<title>User:Boingo</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/User:Boingo"/>
				<updated>2008-01-02T01:16:18Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* About me */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;quot;This is my private bed &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is where I lie at night &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Staring at a light bulb hanging on the ceiling &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waiting for a dream to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
come and get me out of here&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here in my humble room at night&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I often wonder what goes on out there&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
What makes them run so scared &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I often stare at the people passing by &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But they can't see me through my window shades&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Just like I'm not even there&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I know my problems aren't your fault &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I really want to know &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has it always been this way&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If you can find me&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Come and get me out of here&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- ''[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZJHgZX1yQk&amp;amp;NR=1 Private Life]'' by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oingo_Boingo Oingo Boingo] (of [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=universalmusicgroup Universal Media Group]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Info==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Status ===&lt;br /&gt;
The only furry materials I have read so far is [[Immelmann]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Concession]]'' and [[Jay Naylor]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Better Days]]''. I consider both of them to be relatively disturbing. In retrospect, I should have anticipated that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm someone of no particular importance (although I did pretty well on the [[Wikipedia:ACT (examination)|ACT]]) who likes [[Wikipedia:wiki|wiki]] editing (don't ask me why). I have no relation whatsoever to [http://purplelemon.homestead.com/files/decatpics.html 'Purple Lemon'], but more power to him (or her). [http://purplelemon.homestead.com/files/destalk.jpg This Elfman pic just kills me].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I first heard about furries from the infamous [[MTV]] 'Sex2K' episode. I didn't think about it much afterward until some 'unencyclopedia' article lead me to the '[[Pressed Fur]]' website. I looked through that and then eventually stumbled onto here. I recently looked over some of the latest [http://www.hartfordadvocate.com/article.cfm?aid=3873 news] [http://www.memphisflyer.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A10121 articles]. So, it's [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias only just now sunk in] that furries are not... [[stereotype|well, you know]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I once tried to set up a [http://en.wikipedia.org/ Wikipedia] account as [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Revolutionaryluddite 'Revolutionaryluddite'] only to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Missing_Wikipedians#R give up] a few months soon afterward. I recieved a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Barnstars barnstar] for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&amp;amp;limit=500&amp;amp;target=Revolutionaryluddite my contributions], and I was also threatened with banning a couple times. I still make some sporadic edits now and then- most of them music related. The internet's other [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=revolutionaryluddite 'Revolutionaryluddite'] is also me. Make of my eclectic taste in music what you will. [[User:24.32.208.58]] is me as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Name ===&lt;br /&gt;
My [[real life]] name is already being used by a prominent furry ([[User_talk:Boingo|Guess who?]] I'll give you a hint, there's more than one vowel in it). After deciding to create a username based on one of my favorite [[Wikipedia:rock band|bands]], I considered [[wikipedia:Cheap_Trick|Trixie]], [[wikipedia:Ramones|Ramone]], [[wikipedia:Iggy_Pop|Iggy]], [[wikipedia:Thin_Lizzy|Lizzy]], [[wikipedia:Tom_Scholz|Scholz]], [[wikipedia:Def_Leppard|Leppard]], [[wikipedia:Gary_Numan|Numan]], and [[wikipedia:black_crowes|Crowe]]. I picked this because it just sounds/looks good. I suppose that this would make a sweet [[fursona]] name-- [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=boingo+furry it still looks open]-- if I could think of a first name to go with it. Maybe 'Timmy' or 'Johnny'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== About me ===&lt;br /&gt;
When it comes to editing, I like links, single quotes, parenthesis, and citations with multiple links in them (oooh... delicious) and I tend to make a copious amount of spelling and grammar errors (How many can you spot on this page alone?). I wrote a long explanation of my personal beliefs/background/hobbies/whatever on my Wikipedia account for transparency's sake. That was deleted when that account was deleted. Two things that I feel like repeating:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My family is split between [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_American English] [[wikipedia:Fundamentalist_Christianity|Fundamentalist]] [[wikipedia:Lutheran|Lutherans]] (mother's side) and [[wikipedia:Irish_American|Irish]] [[wikipedia:Roman_Catholic_Church|Catholics]] (father's side). Most of them are [[wikipedia:United_States_Democratic_Party|Democrats]]. I self-identify as a [[wikipedia:Evangelicalism|'catholic evangelical']] or [[wikipedia:Evangelical_catholic|'evangelical catholic']].&lt;br /&gt;
*I used to believe in the [[Wikipedia:rapture|rapture]], [[Wikipedia:reparative therapy|reparative therapy]] for [[homosexuals]], and [[Wikipedia:intelligent design|intelligent design]]. I don't anymore, but I'm rather sensitive about it in spite of everything.&lt;br /&gt;
* I used to be a [[wikipedia:Robert_P._Casey Bob Casey Democrat]] until I jumped ship in fall 2004. I [[wikipedia:Opposition_to_the_2003_Iraq_War#Religious_opposition|strongly opposed the initial invasion of Iraq]], however, I support the [[wikipedia:Iraq_War_troop_surge_of_2007|'surge']] and our continual deployment in the region (See [[wikipedia:Anthony_Zinni|Anthony Zinni]]). Politically, I call myself a [[wikipedia:consistent_life_ethic|'consistent life ethicist']] or a [[wikipedia:One_Nation_Conservative|'one nation conservative']].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's about it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FAQ ===&lt;br /&gt;
'''Revolutionaryluddite'?''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's a reference to the late and great cultural critic [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Postman Neil Postman]. As he has [http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/cyberspace/cyberspace_7-25.html pointed out],&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;If people are getting divorced and mistreating their children and their sexism and racism are blights on our social life, none of that has anything to do with inadequate information. Now, along comes cyberspace and the information superhighway, and everyone seems to have the idea that, ah, here we can do it; if only we can have more access to more information faster and in more diverse forms at long last, we'll be able to solve these problems.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/User:Boingo</id>
		<title>User:Boingo</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/User:Boingo"/>
				<updated>2008-01-02T01:09:19Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* Name */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;quot;This is my private bed &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is where I lie at night &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Staring at a light bulb hanging on the ceiling &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waiting for a dream to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
come and get me out of here&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here in my humble room at night&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I often wonder what goes on out there&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
What makes them run so scared &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I often stare at the people passing by &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But they can't see me through my window shades&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Just like I'm not even there&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I know my problems aren't your fault &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I really want to know &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has it always been this way&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If you can find me&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Come and get me out of here&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- ''[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZJHgZX1yQk&amp;amp;NR=1 Private Life]'' by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oingo_Boingo Oingo Boingo] (of [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=universalmusicgroup Universal Media Group]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Info==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Status ===&lt;br /&gt;
The only furry materials I have read so far is [[Immelmann]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Concession]]'' and [[Jay Naylor]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Better Days]]''. I consider both of them to be relatively disturbing. In retrospect, I should have anticipated that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm someone of no particular importance (although I did pretty well on the [[Wikipedia:ACT (examination)|ACT]]) who likes [[Wikipedia:wiki|wiki]] editing (don't ask me why). I have no relation whatsoever to [http://purplelemon.homestead.com/files/decatpics.html 'Purple Lemon'], but more power to him (or her). [http://purplelemon.homestead.com/files/destalk.jpg This Elfman pic just kills me].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I first heard about furries from the infamous [[MTV]] 'Sex2K' episode. I didn't think about it much afterward until some 'unencyclopedia' article lead me to the '[[Pressed Fur]]' website. I looked through that and then eventually stumbled onto here. I recently looked over some of the latest [http://www.hartfordadvocate.com/article.cfm?aid=3873 news] [http://www.memphisflyer.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A10121 articles]. So, it's [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias only just now sunk in] that furries are not... [[stereotype|well, you know]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I once tried to set up a [http://en.wikipedia.org/ Wikipedia] account as [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Revolutionaryluddite 'Revolutionaryluddite'] only to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Missing_Wikipedians#R give up] a few months soon afterward. I recieved a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Barnstars barnstar] for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&amp;amp;limit=500&amp;amp;target=Revolutionaryluddite my contributions], and I was also threatened with banning a couple times. I still make some sporadic edits now and then- most of them music related. The internet's other [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=revolutionaryluddite 'Revolutionaryluddite'] is also me. Make of my eclectic taste in music what you will. [[User:24.32.208.58]] is me as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Name ===&lt;br /&gt;
My [[real life]] name is already being used by a prominent furry ([[User_talk:Boingo|Guess who?]] I'll give you a hint, there's more than one vowel in it). After deciding to create a username based on one of my favorite [[Wikipedia:rock band|bands]], I considered [[wikipedia:Cheap_Trick|Trixie]], [[wikipedia:Ramones|Ramone]], [[wikipedia:Iggy_Pop|Iggy]], [[wikipedia:Thin_Lizzy|Lizzy]], [[wikipedia:Tom_Scholz|Scholz]], [[wikipedia:Def_Leppard|Leppard]], [[wikipedia:Gary_Numan|Numan]], and [[wikipedia:black_crowes|Crowe]]. I picked this because it just sounds/looks good. I suppose that this would make a sweet [[fursona]] name-- [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=boingo+furry it still looks open]-- if I could think of a first name to go with it. Maybe 'Timmy' or 'Johnny'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== About me ===&lt;br /&gt;
When it comes to editing, I like links, single quotes, parenthesis, and citations with multiple links in them (oooh... delicious) and I tend to make a copious amount of spelling and grammar errors (How many can you spot on this page alone?). I wrote a long explanation of my personal beliefs/background/hobbies/whatever on my Wikipedia account for transparency's sake. That was deleted when that account was deleted. Two things that I feel like repeating:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My family is split between [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_American English] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentalist_Christianity Fundamentalist] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lutheran Lutherans] (mother's side) and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_American Irish] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Catholic_Church Catholics] (father's side). Most of them are [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Democratic_Party Democrats]. I self-identify as [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evangelicalism 'catholic evangelical'] or [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evangelical_catholic 'evangelical catholic'].&lt;br /&gt;
*I used to believe in the [[Wikipedia:rapture|rapture]], [[Wikipedia:reparative therapy|reparative therapy]] for [[homosexuals]], and [[Wikipedia:intelligent design|intelligent design]]. I don't anymore, but I'm rather sensitive about it in spite of everything.&lt;br /&gt;
* I used to be a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_P._Casey Bob Casey Democrat] until I jumped ship in fall 2004. I [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_to_the_2003_Iraq_War#Religious_opposition strongly opposed the initial invasion of Iraq], however, I support the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War_troop_surge_of_2007 'surge'] and our continual deployment in the region (See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Zinni Anthony Zinni]). I call myself a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/consistent_life_ethic 'consistent life ethicist'] or a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Nation_Conservative 'one nation conservative'].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's about it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FAQ ===&lt;br /&gt;
'''Revolutionaryluddite'?''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's a reference to the late and great cultural critic [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Postman Neil Postman]. As he has [http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/cyberspace/cyberspace_7-25.html pointed out],&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;If people are getting divorced and mistreating their children and their sexism and racism are blights on our social life, none of that has anything to do with inadequate information. Now, along comes cyberspace and the information superhighway, and everyone seems to have the idea that, ah, here we can do it; if only we can have more access to more information faster and in more diverse forms at long last, we'll be able to solve these problems.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/User:Boingo</id>
		<title>User:Boingo</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/User:Boingo"/>
				<updated>2008-01-02T00:59:58Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* Info */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;quot;This is my private bed &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is where I lie at night &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Staring at a light bulb hanging on the ceiling &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Waiting for a dream to &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
come and get me out of here&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here in my humble room at night&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I often wonder what goes on out there&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
What makes them run so scared &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I often stare at the people passing by &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But they can't see me through my window shades&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Just like I'm not even there&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I know my problems aren't your fault &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I really want to know &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has it always been this way&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If you can find me&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Come and get me out of here&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- ''[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZJHgZX1yQk&amp;amp;NR=1 Private Life]'' by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oingo_Boingo Oingo Boingo] (of [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=universalmusicgroup Universal Media Group]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Info==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Status ===&lt;br /&gt;
The only furry materials I have read so far is [[Immelmann]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Concession]]'' and [[Jay Naylor]]'s [[comic]] ''[[Better Days]]''. I consider both of them to be relatively disturbing. In retrospect, I should have anticipated that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm someone of no particular importance (although I did pretty well on the [[Wikipedia:ACT (examination)|ACT]]) who likes [[Wikipedia:wiki|wiki]] editing (don't ask me why). I have no relation whatsoever to [http://purplelemon.homestead.com/files/decatpics.html 'Purple Lemon'], but more power to him (or her). [http://purplelemon.homestead.com/files/destalk.jpg This Elfman pic just kills me].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I first heard about furries from the infamous [[MTV]] 'Sex2K' episode. I didn't think about it much afterward until some 'unencyclopedia' article lead me to the '[[Pressed Fur]]' website. I looked through that and then eventually stumbled onto here. I recently looked over some of the latest [http://www.hartfordadvocate.com/article.cfm?aid=3873 news] [http://www.memphisflyer.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A10121 articles]. So, it's [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias only just now sunk in] that furries are not... [[stereotype|well, you know]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I once tried to set up a [http://en.wikipedia.org/ Wikipedia] account as [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Revolutionaryluddite 'Revolutionaryluddite'] only to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Missing_Wikipedians#R give up] a few months soon afterward. I recieved a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Barnstars barnstar] for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&amp;amp;limit=500&amp;amp;target=Revolutionaryluddite my contributions], and I was also threatened with banning a couple times. I still make some sporadic edits now and then- most of them music related. The internet's other [http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=revolutionaryluddite 'Revolutionaryluddite'] is also me. Make of my eclectic taste in music what you will. [[User:24.32.208.58]] is me as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Name ===&lt;br /&gt;
After deciding to create a username based on one of my favorite bands, I considered [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheap_Trick Trixie], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramones Ramone], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iggy_Pop Iggy], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thin_Lizzy Lizzy], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Scholz Scholz], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Def_Leppard Leppard], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Numan Numan], and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/black_crowes Crowe]. I picked this because it just sounds/looks good. I suppose this would make a sweet [[fursona]] name-- [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=boingo+furry it still looks open]-- if I could think of a first name to go with it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== About me ===&lt;br /&gt;
When it comes to editing, I like links, single quotes, parenthesis, and citations with multiple links in them (oooh... delicious) and I tend to make a copious amount of spelling and grammar errors (How many can you spot on this page alone?). I wrote a long explanation of my personal beliefs/background/hobbies/whatever on my Wikipedia account for transparency's sake. That was deleted when that account was deleted. Two things that I feel like repeating:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My family is split between [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_American English] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentalist_Christianity Fundamentalist] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lutheran Lutherans] (mother's side) and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_American Irish] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Catholic_Church Catholics] (father's side). Most of them are [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Democratic_Party Democrats]. I self-identify as [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evangelicalism 'catholic evangelical'] or [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evangelical_catholic 'evangelical catholic'].&lt;br /&gt;
*I used to believe in the [[Wikipedia:rapture|rapture]], [[Wikipedia:reparative therapy|reparative therapy]] for [[homosexuals]], and [[Wikipedia:intelligent design|intelligent design]]. I don't anymore, but I'm rather sensitive about it in spite of everything.&lt;br /&gt;
* I used to be a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_P._Casey Bob Casey Democrat] until I jumped ship in fall 2004. I [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_to_the_2003_Iraq_War#Religious_opposition strongly opposed the initial invasion of Iraq], however, I support the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War_troop_surge_of_2007 'surge'] and our continual deployment in the region (See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Zinni Anthony Zinni]). I call myself a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/consistent_life_ethic 'consistent life ethicist'] or a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Nation_Conservative 'one nation conservative'].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's about it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FAQ ===&lt;br /&gt;
'''Revolutionaryluddite'?''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's a reference to the late and great cultural critic [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Postman Neil Postman]. As he has [http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/cyberspace/cyberspace_7-25.html pointed out],&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;If people are getting divorced and mistreating their children and their sexism and racism are blights on our social life, none of that has anything to do with inadequate information. Now, along comes cyberspace and the information superhighway, and everyone seems to have the idea that, ah, here we can do it; if only we can have more access to more information faster and in more diverse forms at long last, we'll be able to solve these problems.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/User_talk:Boingo</id>
		<title>User talk:Boingo</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/User_talk:Boingo"/>
				<updated>2008-01-02T00:32:15Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* These might be stupid questions... */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Welcome to [[WikiFur]]! Thank you for registering an account. We here at [[WikiFur]] look forward to working with you. [[Forum:Help desk|Let us know]] if you need any [[help]] not already provided. If you would like help creating an article or just editing it, don't hesitate to consult the [[Help:Furry Book of Style|Furry Book of Style]] or just contact an [[WikiFur:Administrator|administrator]]. Have a nice day! :-)&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rat|Rat]] 01:24, 24 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How do you mess with the colors/shading on a wiki table? I proposed something like that for [[Talk:Homosexuality|this page]]. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 07:49, 27 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Same as on a normal HTML table, except that there are certain limitations to prevent problems (most notably, you can't set an image as a background unless you do so via sitewide CSS). Probably what you would find most useful is the background-color style. Have a look at any HTML tutorial out there and you should find some tips on HTML tables that you can put to use here. You might also find [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Table Help:Table] useful. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:05, 27 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I made my proposed changes. [[Homosexuality|What do you think?]] [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 01:24, 28 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thought the colours were a little strong, so I tweaked them so that the text was more readable. You can do unordered lists using * at the front.  --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== These might be stupid questions... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
but I still would like to ask:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it always unacceptable to add a link to [[[encyclopedia dramatica]] to a page (Looking something like this: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Aeris A satrical take on the 'Mary Sue' phenomenon]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;), or does it depend on the circumstances?&lt;br /&gt;
*What's the policy on using someone's real, birth-cirtificate listed name in their biographical article?&lt;br /&gt;
*What's the policy on using real life pictures in biographical articles?&lt;br /&gt;
*Since they're so short and they don't really have any prospects for more content, shouldn't the articles '[[bisexual]]' and '[[heterosexual]]' be merged into '[[homosexual]]' to create '[[sexual preference]]'?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 05:03, 29 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:All content decisions are made on a case by case basis. However, ED rarely makes a good link, due to its habit of putting a highly negative spin on any subject that it covers (except for those which result in the glorification of drama). Its editors are also quite willing to make things up if doing so results in &amp;quot;lulz&amp;quot;. For these reasons and others, linking to ED is strongly discouraged, and I would advise you to treat anything you find there with caution. For the specific example you give, there seems no reason not to just use an interwiki link to Wikipedia, which has a perfectly good article on the topic. We would not need to have a separate article as it is not a furry topic.&lt;br /&gt;
:Our policy with birth names is to look at whether or not that name is being concealed in any way. For example, many artists actually go by their real names. Others use fan names alongside their real names. Still others make no mention of their real names, even on the websites containing their work. In the latter case, the use of the real name (if you know it) is probably not appropriate. Real names will usually be removed on request from the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
:The same thing goes for real life pictures. If you know, or have reason to believe that someone would not want their picture on WikiFur, it is probably best not to put it here. On the other hand, many people do not mind, and it can be a useful means of identification.&lt;br /&gt;
:Don't really have an opinion on the last. If you think doing so would make a better encyclopedia, you should do so. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:24, 29 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I made the changes. I'd like to ask you some things about the [[sexual preference]] page.&lt;br /&gt;
*I wrote a snippet saying that some people think that sexual orientation is an artificial construct and does not really exist. But I don't know of any furries advocating that position besides the one person that I linked.&lt;br /&gt;
*I altered the colors on the table so it has the holistic, ying-yang style of intermixed pink and blue. I tried to lighten the colors a lot compared to my first try at it. How does it look now?&lt;br /&gt;
*I wrote a section saying that a cordial split exists among Christian furs between those who believe homosexuality is immoral and those who disagree. Is this accurate? Or do all (or nearly all) of the Christian furries accept homosexuality? The only anti-gay-marriage furry that I know of is [[Prince Jeremy]].*&lt;br /&gt;
*I'd like to find citations for the theories saying ''since having a [[non-furry]] significant other and raising children may result in a fan having less time and money to devote to the fandom, gays are over-represented because they are less likely to be raising children'' and ''Others guess that gays are not over-represented, but that they are simply much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow fans than they are in other areas of their life.''&lt;br /&gt;
*One other theory is that the demographics of the fandom is reasonably close to the general population. It just happens that people who become furries (a 'coming out' of sorts) become more exposed to alternate lifestyles (which might result in a paralell 'coming out'). I considered adding this to the article, but I didn't because it seems overly speculative.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 07:32, 31 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;Based on his infamous &amp;quot;you all belong in concentration camps&amp;quot; comment. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 23:44, 31 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have made [http://furry.wikia.com/index.php?title=Sexual_preference&amp;amp;diff=177377&amp;amp;oldid=177376 further edits]. Some general points:&lt;br /&gt;
:*If you are intending to move one page to another title, use the Move tab at the top rather than cut and pasting. Doing the latter breaks the edit history, and deprives others of the credit for their prior edits, which is required for [[WikiFur:Copyrights|GFDL]] compliance.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Link to Wikipedia by using &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Article name|text to display]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Per the [[WikiFur:Furry Book of Style|style guide]], only the first word of titles should be capitalized unless the word would normally be capitalized (like a name).&lt;br /&gt;
:*Use a spellchecker. :-) If you use a [http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-beta.html recent beta of Firefox] it will have one built in.&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer your questions:&lt;br /&gt;
:*The table looks fine to me.&lt;br /&gt;
:*I suspect there are some who are less than enthused about it, but I do not know for sure. You could always ask the community of Christian furs (or see if the question has been asked already). Jeremy would be an outlier for most purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
:*I'm not sure you can really get a citation for that, but you could give examples of involvement in such activities. For example, very significant proportions of the leadership at [[convention]]s and other furry events are gay, including key members of (at least) [[List of conventions by attendance|the top five event by attendance]], as well as the larger ones overseas. I should note that leadership in this area is not exclusive - as far as I know, there is no &amp;quot;anti-breeder&amp;quot; bias - but if you look closely it is a very clear trend. It might be because gay community members are more interested in organizing communal events. I don't know.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Possible. I think the current situation is a combination of this effect and others. Again, more research is required. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I apologize for messing up the move (I only did it once before in my Wikipedia days). I didn't realize how to use the Wikilink code until I was about halfway through editing the page; I'll use it the correct way in the future.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''I suspect there are some who are less than enthused about it, but I do not know for sure. You could always ask the community of Christian furs'' I've read a lot of furries' livejournals but I don't have one myself (and- to be honest with you- I really do not want one, especially after reading several &amp;quot;if I see him again, I'll rip his f*cking throat out&amp;quot; posts.) Has [[Kendricks]] been editing on Wikifur recently? Could I ask him on his talk page?&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''Jeremy would be an outlier for most purposes.'' I don't know what you mean by &amp;quot;outlier&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''as far as I know, there is no &amp;quot;anti-breeder&amp;quot; bias - but if you look closely it is a very clear trend'' I don't know what &amp;quot;anti-breeder&amp;quot; means. I'm a compete noob, so I don't know the furry lexicon (Please resist the urge to choke my neck with your mind as you type your response).&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''Possible. I think the current situation is a combination of this effect and others. Again, more research is required.'' I see. I think the [[Sexual_preference#Theories|theories section]] does a good job of describing every viewpoint. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 23:15, 1 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::*I edited the page so that the praises and criticisms of the Kinsey reports now have exact citations. The only major omission that I can still see is that the article doesn't talk about transgender furries (and/or furries with fursonas of the opposite gender)- but I don't know if this should be mentioned at all. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 00:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation</id>
		<title>Sexual orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-02T00:23:54Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: message to viewers&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''This page is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Orphan orphaned] since few other WikiFur articles link to it. [http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/WikiFur:About You can help!]'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gay_flag.png|right|thumb|150px|The rainbow flag associated with [[wikipedia:homosexuality|homosexuality]] in and out of the [[furry fandom|fandom]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sexual preference''' describes the gender or genders that someone feels sexually attracted to. The term [[wikipedia:Sexual_orientation|'''sexual orientation''']] is often used interchangably, but the term 'sexual preference' is more broad and includes personal attitudes in between the three general categories defined as [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientations]]. [[Wikipedia:Heterosexuality|'''Heterosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the opposite gender. [[Wikipedia:Bisexuality|'''Bisexuality''']] is the sexual attraction to members of both sexes, [[male]] and [[female]]. [[wikipedia:homosexuality|'''Homosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the same gender. '''Gay''' is often used synonymously, although the term generally refers to [[male|male/male]] relationships, as compared with '''lesbian''' for [[female|female/female]] relationships. '''Gay''' is sometimes used to refer to both homosexuals and bisexuals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[non-furry|Non-furries]] generally take the position that a significantly larger proportion of the [[furry fandom]] is gay or bisexual compared to the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; A lack of completely reliable survey data exists within both the fandom&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The studies that have been done suggest that this is true, though not to the large extent that is often suggested.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Furries have suggested various theories for this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Categorization==&lt;br /&gt;
The current [[Wikipedia:scientific consensus|scientific consensus]] advocated by various social and educational organizations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;such as the [[Wikipedia:American Psychiatric Association|American Psychiatric Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Psychological Association|American Psychological Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Counseling Association|American Counseling Association]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of Social Workers|National Association of Social Workers]], the [[Wikipedia:American Academy of Pediatrics|American Academy of Pediatrics]], the [[Wikipedia:American Association of School Administrators|American Association of School Administrators]], the [[Wikipedia:American Federation of Teachers|American Federation of Teachers]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of School Psychologists|National Association of School Psychologists]], and the [[Wikipedia:National Education Association|National Education Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is that people develop their own permanent, unchangeable [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientation]] within one of the three categories in their [[Wikipedia:childhood|early childhood]] as [[Wikipedia:Biology and sexual orientation|a combination of genetic tendencies and their social environment]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/publications/justthefacts.html Just the Facts About Sexual Orientation &amp;amp; Youth: A Primer for Principals, Educators and School Personnel] 1999, American Psychological Association&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minority of researchers, sometimes known as [[Wikipedia:Queer theory|'queer theorists']], believe that the concept of sexual orientations is a [[Wikipedia:social construct|social construct]] and that people naturally exhibit a variety of attractions. Some furries also subscribe to this view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pressedfur.coolfreepages.com/essay/postvixen/index.html &amp;quot;Sitting On the Third Side of the Fence&amp;quot;] by Hannah Kincaid from [[Pressed Fur]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although he did not advocate the social construct theory, [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey]] stated that &amp;quot;[[Males]] do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual... The living world is a continuum in each and every one of its aspects.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-hhscale.html &amp;quot;Kinsey's Heterosexual-Homosexual Rating Scale&amp;quot;] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He postulated a [[Wikipedia:Kinsey Scale|scale]] of sexual preferences from zero to six, zero being exclusively heterosexual.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social attitudes among furries==&lt;br /&gt;
''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], found that &amp;quot;race, religion and sexual orientation (as divisive factors) are simply too minor to attract any real attention&amp;quot; and that furries have &amp;quot;higher tolerance for variety in sexual orientation and activity&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A small yet significant minority of furries self-identify as [[Christian furs|Christian]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Some of them believe in the [[Wikipedia:the bible and homosexuality|traditional Christian view]] that homosexual conduct is immoral and that homosexuals should be [[Wikipedia:celibacy|celibate]]. Other [[Christian furs]] believe that the Bible verses and [[Wikipedia:sacred tradition|sacred traditions]] cited against homosexuality are misinterpreted.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark The furries of 'Rainbow Ark'] [http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark/profile take this view]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Both sides maintain a cordial relationship with each other and try to promote mutual understanding.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; [http://www.gaychristian.net/greatdebate.php This website] summarizes the arguments in the debate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===General surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimates of the incidence of homosexuality in the general population vary greatly, due in part to the lack of reliable survey data and the difficulty in defining [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_orientation sexual orientations].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Retrieved September 28th, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey's]] work ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male|Sexual Behavior in the Human Male]]'' found that &amp;quot;46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or &amp;quot;reacted to&amp;quot; persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives&amp;quot;. In addition, the book stated that &amp;quot;10% of males in the sample were predominantly homosexual between the ages of 16 and 55&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html Research Summary] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Kinsey's book, and its companion ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Female|Sexual Behavior in the Human Female]]'', have received [[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male#Criticism|vocal criticism]] for their findings and methodology.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/reisman.html &amp;quot;Kinsey and the Homosexual Revolution&amp;quot;] by [[Wikipedia: Judith Reisman|Dr. Judith Reisman]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.swlearning.com/quant/kohler/stat/biographical_sketches/bio15.1.html Biography of Statician] [[Wikipedia:John Tukey|John W. Tukey]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Human Events|Human Events]] calls the Kinsey Report the fourth [http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=7591 Most Harmful Book of the 19th and 20th Centuries].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''[[Wikipedia:The New York Times|The New York Times]]'' called his research &amp;quot;conscientious and comprehensive&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pomeroy, Wardell (1972). Dr. Kinsey and the Institute for Sex Research. New York: Harper &amp;amp; Row.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Professor [[Wikipedia:Martin Duberman|Martin Duberman]] called it &amp;quot;skillful&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;a monumental endeavor&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/publications/duberman.html Book review of] '''[http://www.amazon.com/Alfred-C-Kinsey-Public-Private/dp/0393040860 Alfred C. Kinsey : A Public/Private Life]''' originally published in ''[[Wikipedia:The Nation|The Nation]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several recent surveys done in [[Wikipedia:Western world|Western countries]] such as [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]], [[Wikipedia:Australia|Australia]], and the [[Wikipedia:United States|United States]] typically define between 1% and 10% of the general population, which an average around 5%, as homosexual or bisexual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Accessed December 31, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The British government conducted a country-wide survey in 2005 as part of the [[Wikipedia:Civil_Partnership_Act_2004|''Civil Partnership Act'']]. This study, the only official government study of its kind, stated that 6% of the [[Wikipedia:United Kingdom|United Kingdom]] would be interested in forming a [[Wikipedia:civil union|civil union]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nihe.gov.uk/publications/consultation_documents/Draft%20Policy%20Statement%20on%20SO%20Dec06.pdf Sexual Orientation Policy Statement Draft for Consultation] (pdf)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fandom surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are multiple estimates of the percentage of gays in the furry fandom. It is often thought within the fandom that the number is high, possibly as high as 90%,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; but polls have shown differences in estimation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A 2007 [[Wikipedia:University of California, Davis|University of California at Davis]] study found that 37.3% of respondents were bisexual, 32.7% heterosexual, 25.5% homosexual, and 8% were [[Wikipedia:questioning (sexuality)|uncertain]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://studyf3.livejournal.com/1383.html &amp;quot;Furry Survey Results&amp;quot;] from University of California, Davis: Department of Psychology. Published 2007-05-05. Accessed 2007-05-05.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll used in ''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], showed 25% heterosexual, 19% homosexual, and 48% bisexual out of 360 peopled polled.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Sociology of Furry Fandom]. Retrieved October 19, 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rust concluded that &amp;quot;Truth be told, there are many more homosexual members of the fandom than in general society.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll (of indeterminable date, but before 2005) on the [[IFPL]] used the [[Wikipedia:Kinsey scale|Kinsey scale]] to rate the measure of homosexuality in respondents:&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin: 1em 1em 1em 0; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px #aaa solid; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 95%;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #C6E3FF&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 12.9%&lt;br /&gt;
| (63/487)&lt;br /&gt;
| 0 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively heterosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #A7B1EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.3%&lt;br /&gt;
| (89/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 1 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CBABE2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.7%&lt;br /&gt;
| (91/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, more than incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CF71EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 14.8%&lt;br /&gt;
| (72/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| Equally heterosexual and homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #DF99D4&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 11.3% &lt;br /&gt;
| (55/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 4 &lt;br /&gt;
|Predominately homosexual, more than incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #F79FD1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 16.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (78/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 5 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately homosexual, incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #FFB1D8&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 8.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (39/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 6 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively homosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* A 2006 [http://faod.org/ FAOD] poll showed 25% heterosexual, 20% homosexual, and 55% bisexual (out of 44 polled)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://faod.org/index.php?topic=179.0 FAOD Message Board]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furtopia]] poll (open 2003 to present) stated that 53% were heterosexual, 15% gay, and 30% bisexual out of 862 people polled.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://cgi.furtopia.org/cgi-bin/ib311/ikonboard.cgi?s=411086f03c728556d957bd1ffd9b528a;act=ST;f=77;t=9074 Furtopia Message Board] Retrieved September 5, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furry_Survey|poll]] by [[Alex Osaki]] reported that 42.75% were heterosexual, 16.86% were homosexual, 35.29% were bisexual, and 4.71% self-identified as neither.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey.php Furry Poll Results] as of December 30, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Theories===&lt;br /&gt;
One viable theory involves [[Mark Merlino]], a former chair of [[ConFurence]] who co-founded the first furry [[conventions]]. [[Crush Yiff Destroy]] has suggested that Merlino actively recruited alternative lifestylers into the fandom, and that this influences furry demographics to this day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.crushyiffdestroy.com/show/merlino &amp;quot;Journey to the Center of Mark Merlino&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Furries also guess that, since having a [[non-furry]] significant other and raising children may result in a fan having less time and money to devote to the fandom, gays are over-represented because they are less likely to be raising children.{{fact}} Some speculate that the negative [[Wikipedia:social stigma|social stigma]] [[Wikipedia:Furry fandom#Media coverage|attached to the fandom]] keeps away heterosexual [[mundanes]] who would otherwise feel interested. David Rust has stated that &amp;quot;The social variations for Furries may seem unusual from a generic, American viewpoint. However, from the position of a group of people who are already predisposed to enjoying anthropomorphic animals, other concepts such as homosexuality... seem somewhat mundane and unimportant by comparison.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Others guess that gays are not over-represented, but that they are simply much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow fans than they are in other areas of their life.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
One other theory is that the demographics of the fandom is reasonably close to the general population. It just happens that people who become furries, a [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']] of sorts, become more exposed to alternate lifestyles and may reconsider their own sexuality, which might result in a paralell [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']].{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:gay|'Gay']] at [[Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Relationship terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sociology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Furry_Survey</id>
		<title>Furry Survey</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Furry_Survey"/>
				<updated>2008-01-02T00:19:58Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;:''The [[Furvey]] is a personal, detailed questionnaire that originated on [[alt.lifestyle.furry]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Furry Survey''', developed by [[Alex Osaki]], is intended to compile information about people in the [[furry fandom]]. It is a 27-question web-based poll gathering information on geographic location, [[Sexual preference|sexual orientation]], and other common demographic issues. As of September 6, 2007, it had roughly 250 respondents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An initial version of the survey was compiled in late 2003 and posted to various Usenet groups and furry message boards. The current version, slightly rewritten in August 2007, has been running since April 4, 2005 and does not include data from the initial survey.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stated goal of the survey is both &amp;quot;to improve the public perception of the fandom by providing a database of objective information&amp;quot; and, more objectively, to gather &amp;quot;primary-source data... critical to the understanding of any sociological demographic&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Please note that the survey is ongoing and continues to update.  Unless otherwise noted, results quoted in this article are as of 6 September 2007.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In general, the results of the survey mesh with existing data, including that of the [[News:UC Davis posts furry survey results|University of California, Davis campus]]. The survey reports that 80.7% of respondents were male, 82.7% self-identified as &amp;quot;Caucasian, non-Hispanic&amp;quot;, and 72.4% reported their location as the United States (10.7% reported their location as Canada).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== General Demographics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The survey indicates a comparatively young fandom, with nearly half (47%) of respondents reporting their age as between 15 and 19; the average age of 21 years is slightly younger than the UC-Davis indicated figure of 24.6 years. Correspondingly, more than 70% of respondents said they had considered themselves a furry for between 0 and 5 years; 2.8% said they had done so for less than 1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The education level is roughly what one would expect from the age distributions. The percentage of respondents aged 25 or higher reporting a college degree, at 31%, is higher than the 28.4% reported by the US Census Bureau by a statistically meaningless amount. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furries tended to report that they shied away from mainstream religions; less than a quarter reported adhering to a Christian belief system; there were only three Jews, one Muslim, and no Hindus or Buddhists. 10.1% reported their religion as &amp;quot;pagan&amp;quot;; the most popular answer, &amp;quot;other&amp;quot; (25.4%), includes a wide variety of people adhering to systems of their own design. 40% were agnostic or atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Furry Issues ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Self Identity ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
68.6% of respondents [[Otherkin#Otherkin and Furry Fandom|identified]] &amp;quot;strongly&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extremely strongly&amp;quot; as human. 11.3%, asked to respond to the statement &amp;quot;I am predominantly human&amp;quot;, said that they did not consider themselves human at all. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sexual Orientation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among respondents listing an orientation, 42.3% described themselves as heterosexual, 17.1% as homosexual, and 35.9% as bisexual. These numbers mesh to some degree with those reported by the University of California (32.7% heterosexual, 25.5% homosexual, 37.3% bisexual); however, the percentage identifying as heterosexual or homosexual differs by a statistically-significant degree in both cases. No explanation is offered for this difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sexual Activity ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps one of the more intriguing aspects comes from a series of questions asking respondents to describe how important they considered [[yiff|sex]] to be for their furry lives, as well as for the furry lives of others. A third question asked respondents to comment on the perception of the importance of sex by the public at large. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While nearly all (94.6%) answered that the public assumed sex played a &amp;quot;large&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extremely large&amp;quot; role in the furry fandom, only 18% of respondents answered similarly for themselves. The distribution is strongly skewed towards a minimising of the importance of sex; more than half (50.4%) said it played a &amp;quot;small&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extremely small&amp;quot; role.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, they were more agnostic about their fellow furries. Well over half (57.4%) believed it was of &amp;quot;medium&amp;quot; importance to other furries; more than a quarter answered that they believed it was important to a &amp;quot;large&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extremely large&amp;quot; degree. While 29.2% of respondents said sex played a &amp;quot;small&amp;quot; role to them, only 12.2% said they believed it played a small role for others. More drastically, while one-fifth of respondents (20.7%) said sex had an &amp;quot;extremely small&amp;quot; degree of significance to their furry lives, only 1.7% believed it played an extremely small role in the lives of other furries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Zoophilia ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
15.7% of respondents self-identified as [[zoophilia|zoophiles]], an amount which may or may not be different in a statistical sense from the general population (Alvarez and Freinhar's control groups reported a 10% and 15% prevalence respectively). No questions were asked as to the degree of activity, if any.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Respondents were agnostic leaning negative towards zoophiles. Of users reporting an opinion, a plurality (28.8%) described themselves as ambivalent, with 20% reporting positive feelings and around 40% reporting negative ones. If the answer is limited to non-zoophiles, the number reporting &amp;quot;negative&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extremely negative&amp;quot; feelings increases to 54%, with &amp;quot;extremely negative&amp;quot;, while remaining the second most common answer, increasing to a third of all respondents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Activities Within the Fandom ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A portion of the survey is dedicated to exploring what people consider to be important within the fandom. Respondents consistently reported creative activity; 48.8% described themselves as artists and 49.6% as authors. Correspondingly, 86% described [[furry art|graphic art]] as &amp;quot;important&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extremely important&amp;quot;; 71.2% said the same about [[furry fiction|writing]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Besting both of these, 93% of respondents said that online communities were &amp;quot;important&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extremely important&amp;quot;, with 80.7% choosing the latter option--perhaps unsurprisingly given that the survey was administered online. Music was much less popular; only 21.8% of respondents described it as &amp;quot;important&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extremely important&amp;quot;; 35.4% described it as &amp;quot;unimportant&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extremely unimportant&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although only a tenth of furries (11.7%) described themselves as a regular attendee of conventions, more than half (56.4%) identified conventions as being &amp;quot;important&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extremely important&amp;quot;; only 4% of respondents believed them to be unimportant or extremely unimportant. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Miscellaneous ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The data from the survey matches closely with that from the University of California in suggesting that ~82% of furries are not themselves fursuiters. On the whole, furries display a strong commonality of interests; 77.8% described themselves as being fans of science-fiction; 75.4% said they were fans of science and technology or computers. 58.1% described themselves as fans of anime; 54.8% as fans of role-playing games.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.klisoura.com/furrypoll.php Furry Survey v.2.0.4]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey.php Results of the Furry Survey]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.census.gov/prod/2004pubs/p20-550.pdf Educational Attainment in the United States: 2003]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://studyf3.livejournal.com/1383.html Furry Survey Results - UC Davis]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Terms]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation</id>
		<title>Sexual orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-02T00:18:13Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* Fandom surveys */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Gay_flag.png|right|thumb|150px|The rainbow flag associated with [[wikipedia:homosexuality|homosexuality]] in and out of the [[furry fandom|fandom]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sexual preference''' describes the gender or genders that someone feels sexually attracted to. The term [[wikipedia:Sexual_orientation|'''sexual orientation''']] is often used interchangably, but the term 'sexual preference' is more broad and includes personal attitudes in between the three general categories defined as [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientations]]. [[Wikipedia:Heterosexuality|'''Heterosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the opposite gender. [[Wikipedia:Bisexuality|'''Bisexuality''']] is the sexual attraction to members of both sexes, [[male]] and [[female]]. [[wikipedia:homosexuality|'''Homosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the same gender. '''Gay''' is often used synonymously, although the term generally refers to [[male|male/male]] relationships, as compared with '''lesbian''' for [[female|female/female]] relationships. '''Gay''' is sometimes used to refer to both homosexuals and bisexuals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[non-furry|Non-furries]] generally take the position that a significantly larger proportion of the [[furry fandom]] is gay or bisexual compared to the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; A lack of completely reliable survey data exists within both the fandom&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The studies that have been done suggest that this is true, though not to the large extent that is often suggested.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Furries have suggested various theories for this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Categorization==&lt;br /&gt;
The current [[Wikipedia:scientific consensus|scientific consensus]] advocated by various social and educational organizations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;such as the [[Wikipedia:American Psychiatric Association|American Psychiatric Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Psychological Association|American Psychological Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Counseling Association|American Counseling Association]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of Social Workers|National Association of Social Workers]], the [[Wikipedia:American Academy of Pediatrics|American Academy of Pediatrics]], the [[Wikipedia:American Association of School Administrators|American Association of School Administrators]], the [[Wikipedia:American Federation of Teachers|American Federation of Teachers]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of School Psychologists|National Association of School Psychologists]], and the [[Wikipedia:National Education Association|National Education Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is that people develop their own permanent, unchangeable [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientation]] within one of the three categories in their [[Wikipedia:childhood|early childhood]] as [[Wikipedia:Biology and sexual orientation|a combination of genetic tendencies and their social environment]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/publications/justthefacts.html Just the Facts About Sexual Orientation &amp;amp; Youth: A Primer for Principals, Educators and School Personnel] 1999, American Psychological Association&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minority of researchers, sometimes known as [[Wikipedia:Queer theory|'queer theorists']], believe that the concept of sexual orientations is a [[Wikipedia:social construct|social construct]] and that people naturally exhibit a variety of attractions. Some furries also subscribe to this view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pressedfur.coolfreepages.com/essay/postvixen/index.html &amp;quot;Sitting On the Third Side of the Fence&amp;quot;] by Hannah Kincaid from [[Pressed Fur]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although he did not advocate the social construct theory, [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey]] stated that &amp;quot;[[Males]] do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual... The living world is a continuum in each and every one of its aspects.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-hhscale.html &amp;quot;Kinsey's Heterosexual-Homosexual Rating Scale&amp;quot;] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He postulated a [[Wikipedia:Kinsey Scale|scale]] of sexual preferences from zero to six, zero being exclusively heterosexual.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social attitudes among furries==&lt;br /&gt;
''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], found that &amp;quot;race, religion and sexual orientation (as divisive factors) are simply too minor to attract any real attention&amp;quot; and that furries have &amp;quot;higher tolerance for variety in sexual orientation and activity&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A small yet significant minority of furries self-identify as [[Christian furs|Christian]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Some of them believe in the [[Wikipedia:the bible and homosexuality|traditional Christian view]] that homosexual conduct is immoral and that homosexuals should be [[Wikipedia:celibacy|celibate]]. Other [[Christian furs]] believe that the Bible verses and [[Wikipedia:sacred tradition|sacred traditions]] cited against homosexuality are misinterpreted.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark The furries of 'Rainbow Ark'] [http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark/profile take this view]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Both sides maintain a cordial relationship with each other and try to promote mutual understanding.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; [http://www.gaychristian.net/greatdebate.php This website] summarizes the arguments in the debate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===General surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimates of the incidence of homosexuality in the general population vary greatly, due in part to the lack of reliable survey data and the difficulty in defining [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_orientation sexual orientations].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Retrieved September 28th, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey's]] work ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male|Sexual Behavior in the Human Male]]'' found that &amp;quot;46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or &amp;quot;reacted to&amp;quot; persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives&amp;quot;. In addition, the book stated that &amp;quot;10% of males in the sample were predominantly homosexual between the ages of 16 and 55&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html Research Summary] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Kinsey's book, and its companion ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Female|Sexual Behavior in the Human Female]]'', have received [[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male#Criticism|vocal criticism]] for their findings and methodology.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/reisman.html &amp;quot;Kinsey and the Homosexual Revolution&amp;quot;] by [[Wikipedia: Judith Reisman|Dr. Judith Reisman]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.swlearning.com/quant/kohler/stat/biographical_sketches/bio15.1.html Biography of Statician] [[Wikipedia:John Tukey|John W. Tukey]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Human Events|Human Events]] calls the Kinsey Report the fourth [http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=7591 Most Harmful Book of the 19th and 20th Centuries].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''[[Wikipedia:The New York Times|The New York Times]]'' called his research &amp;quot;conscientious and comprehensive&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pomeroy, Wardell (1972). Dr. Kinsey and the Institute for Sex Research. New York: Harper &amp;amp; Row.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Professor [[Wikipedia:Martin Duberman|Martin Duberman]] called it &amp;quot;skillful&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;a monumental endeavor&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/publications/duberman.html Book review of] '''[http://www.amazon.com/Alfred-C-Kinsey-Public-Private/dp/0393040860 Alfred C. Kinsey : A Public/Private Life]''' originally published in ''[[Wikipedia:The Nation|The Nation]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several recent surveys done in [[Wikipedia:Western world|Western countries]] such as [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]], [[Wikipedia:Australia|Australia]], and the [[Wikipedia:United States|United States]] typically define between 1% and 10% of the general population, which an average around 5%, as homosexual or bisexual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Accessed December 31, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The British government conducted a country-wide survey in 2005 as part of the [[Wikipedia:Civil_Partnership_Act_2004|''Civil Partnership Act'']]. This study, the only official government study of its kind, stated that 6% of the [[Wikipedia:United Kingdom|United Kingdom]] would be interested in forming a [[Wikipedia:civil union|civil union]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nihe.gov.uk/publications/consultation_documents/Draft%20Policy%20Statement%20on%20SO%20Dec06.pdf Sexual Orientation Policy Statement Draft for Consultation] (pdf)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fandom surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are multiple estimates of the percentage of gays in the furry fandom. It is often thought within the fandom that the number is high, possibly as high as 90%,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; but polls have shown differences in estimation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A 2007 [[Wikipedia:University of California, Davis|University of California at Davis]] study found that 37.3% of respondents were bisexual, 32.7% heterosexual, 25.5% homosexual, and 8% were [[Wikipedia:questioning (sexuality)|uncertain]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://studyf3.livejournal.com/1383.html &amp;quot;Furry Survey Results&amp;quot;] from University of California, Davis: Department of Psychology. Published 2007-05-05. Accessed 2007-05-05.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll used in ''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], showed 25% heterosexual, 19% homosexual, and 48% bisexual out of 360 peopled polled.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Sociology of Furry Fandom]. Retrieved October 19, 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rust concluded that &amp;quot;Truth be told, there are many more homosexual members of the fandom than in general society.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll (of indeterminable date, but before 2005) on the [[IFPL]] used the [[Wikipedia:Kinsey scale|Kinsey scale]] to rate the measure of homosexuality in respondents:&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin: 1em 1em 1em 0; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px #aaa solid; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 95%;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #C6E3FF&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 12.9%&lt;br /&gt;
| (63/487)&lt;br /&gt;
| 0 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively heterosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #A7B1EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.3%&lt;br /&gt;
| (89/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 1 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CBABE2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.7%&lt;br /&gt;
| (91/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, more than incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CF71EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 14.8%&lt;br /&gt;
| (72/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| Equally heterosexual and homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #DF99D4&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 11.3% &lt;br /&gt;
| (55/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 4 &lt;br /&gt;
|Predominately homosexual, more than incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #F79FD1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 16.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (78/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 5 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately homosexual, incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #FFB1D8&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 8.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (39/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 6 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively homosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* A 2006 [http://faod.org/ FAOD] poll showed 25% heterosexual, 20% homosexual, and 55% bisexual (out of 44 polled)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://faod.org/index.php?topic=179.0 FAOD Message Board]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furtopia]] poll (open 2003 to present) stated that 53% were heterosexual, 15% gay, and 30% bisexual out of 862 people polled.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://cgi.furtopia.org/cgi-bin/ib311/ikonboard.cgi?s=411086f03c728556d957bd1ffd9b528a;act=ST;f=77;t=9074 Furtopia Message Board] Retrieved September 5, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furry_Survey|poll]] by [[Alex Osaki]] reported that 42.75% were heterosexual, 16.86% were homosexual, 35.29% were bisexual, and 4.71% self-identified as neither.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey.php Furry Poll Results] as of December 30, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Theories===&lt;br /&gt;
One viable theory involves [[Mark Merlino]], a former chair of [[ConFurence]] who co-founded the first furry [[conventions]]. [[Crush Yiff Destroy]] has suggested that Merlino actively recruited alternative lifestylers into the fandom, and that this influences furry demographics to this day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.crushyiffdestroy.com/show/merlino &amp;quot;Journey to the Center of Mark Merlino&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Furries also guess that, since having a [[non-furry]] significant other and raising children may result in a fan having less time and money to devote to the fandom, gays are over-represented because they are less likely to be raising children.{{fact}} Some speculate that the negative [[Wikipedia:social stigma|social stigma]] [[Wikipedia:Furry fandom#Media coverage|attached to the fandom]] keeps away heterosexual [[mundanes]] who would otherwise feel interested. David Rust has stated that &amp;quot;The social variations for Furries may seem unusual from a generic, American viewpoint. However, from the position of a group of people who are already predisposed to enjoying anthropomorphic animals, other concepts such as homosexuality... seem somewhat mundane and unimportant by comparison.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Others guess that gays are not over-represented, but that they are simply much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow fans than they are in other areas of their life.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
One other theory is that the demographics of the fandom is reasonably close to the general population. It just happens that people who become furries, a [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']] of sorts, become more exposed to alternate lifestyles and may reconsider their own sexuality, which might result in a paralell [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']].{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:gay|'Gay']] at [[Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Relationship terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sociology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation</id>
		<title>Sexual orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-02T00:16:44Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* General surveys */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Gay_flag.png|right|thumb|150px|The rainbow flag associated with [[wikipedia:homosexuality|homosexuality]] in and out of the [[furry fandom|fandom]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sexual preference''' describes the gender or genders that someone feels sexually attracted to. The term [[wikipedia:Sexual_orientation|'''sexual orientation''']] is often used interchangably, but the term 'sexual preference' is more broad and includes personal attitudes in between the three general categories defined as [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientations]]. [[Wikipedia:Heterosexuality|'''Heterosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the opposite gender. [[Wikipedia:Bisexuality|'''Bisexuality''']] is the sexual attraction to members of both sexes, [[male]] and [[female]]. [[wikipedia:homosexuality|'''Homosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the same gender. '''Gay''' is often used synonymously, although the term generally refers to [[male|male/male]] relationships, as compared with '''lesbian''' for [[female|female/female]] relationships. '''Gay''' is sometimes used to refer to both homosexuals and bisexuals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[non-furry|Non-furries]] generally take the position that a significantly larger proportion of the [[furry fandom]] is gay or bisexual compared to the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; A lack of completely reliable survey data exists within both the fandom&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The studies that have been done suggest that this is true, though not to the large extent that is often suggested.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Furries have suggested various theories for this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Categorization==&lt;br /&gt;
The current [[Wikipedia:scientific consensus|scientific consensus]] advocated by various social and educational organizations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;such as the [[Wikipedia:American Psychiatric Association|American Psychiatric Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Psychological Association|American Psychological Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Counseling Association|American Counseling Association]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of Social Workers|National Association of Social Workers]], the [[Wikipedia:American Academy of Pediatrics|American Academy of Pediatrics]], the [[Wikipedia:American Association of School Administrators|American Association of School Administrators]], the [[Wikipedia:American Federation of Teachers|American Federation of Teachers]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of School Psychologists|National Association of School Psychologists]], and the [[Wikipedia:National Education Association|National Education Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is that people develop their own permanent, unchangeable [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientation]] within one of the three categories in their [[Wikipedia:childhood|early childhood]] as [[Wikipedia:Biology and sexual orientation|a combination of genetic tendencies and their social environment]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/publications/justthefacts.html Just the Facts About Sexual Orientation &amp;amp; Youth: A Primer for Principals, Educators and School Personnel] 1999, American Psychological Association&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minority of researchers, sometimes known as [[Wikipedia:Queer theory|'queer theorists']], believe that the concept of sexual orientations is a [[Wikipedia:social construct|social construct]] and that people naturally exhibit a variety of attractions. Some furries also subscribe to this view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pressedfur.coolfreepages.com/essay/postvixen/index.html &amp;quot;Sitting On the Third Side of the Fence&amp;quot;] by Hannah Kincaid from [[Pressed Fur]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although he did not advocate the social construct theory, [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey]] stated that &amp;quot;[[Males]] do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual... The living world is a continuum in each and every one of its aspects.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-hhscale.html &amp;quot;Kinsey's Heterosexual-Homosexual Rating Scale&amp;quot;] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He postulated a [[Wikipedia:Kinsey Scale|scale]] of sexual preferences from zero to six, zero being exclusively heterosexual.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social attitudes among furries==&lt;br /&gt;
''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], found that &amp;quot;race, religion and sexual orientation (as divisive factors) are simply too minor to attract any real attention&amp;quot; and that furries have &amp;quot;higher tolerance for variety in sexual orientation and activity&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A small yet significant minority of furries self-identify as [[Christian furs|Christian]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Some of them believe in the [[Wikipedia:the bible and homosexuality|traditional Christian view]] that homosexual conduct is immoral and that homosexuals should be [[Wikipedia:celibacy|celibate]]. Other [[Christian furs]] believe that the Bible verses and [[Wikipedia:sacred tradition|sacred traditions]] cited against homosexuality are misinterpreted.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark The furries of 'Rainbow Ark'] [http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark/profile take this view]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Both sides maintain a cordial relationship with each other and try to promote mutual understanding.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; [http://www.gaychristian.net/greatdebate.php This website] summarizes the arguments in the debate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===General surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimates of the incidence of homosexuality in the general population vary greatly, due in part to the lack of reliable survey data and the difficulty in defining [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_orientation sexual orientations].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Retrieved September 28th, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey's]] work ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male|Sexual Behavior in the Human Male]]'' found that &amp;quot;46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or &amp;quot;reacted to&amp;quot; persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives&amp;quot;. In addition, the book stated that &amp;quot;10% of males in the sample were predominantly homosexual between the ages of 16 and 55&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html Research Summary] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Kinsey's book, and its companion ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Female|Sexual Behavior in the Human Female]]'', have received [[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male#Criticism|vocal criticism]] for their findings and methodology.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/reisman.html &amp;quot;Kinsey and the Homosexual Revolution&amp;quot;] by [[Wikipedia: Judith Reisman|Dr. Judith Reisman]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.swlearning.com/quant/kohler/stat/biographical_sketches/bio15.1.html Biography of Statician] [[Wikipedia:John Tukey|John W. Tukey]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Human Events|Human Events]] calls the Kinsey Report the fourth [http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=7591 Most Harmful Book of the 19th and 20th Centuries].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''[[Wikipedia:The New York Times|The New York Times]]'' called his research &amp;quot;conscientious and comprehensive&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pomeroy, Wardell (1972). Dr. Kinsey and the Institute for Sex Research. New York: Harper &amp;amp; Row.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Professor [[Wikipedia:Martin Duberman|Martin Duberman]] called it &amp;quot;skillful&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;a monumental endeavor&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/publications/duberman.html Book review of] '''[http://www.amazon.com/Alfred-C-Kinsey-Public-Private/dp/0393040860 Alfred C. Kinsey : A Public/Private Life]''' originally published in ''[[Wikipedia:The Nation|The Nation]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several recent surveys done in [[Wikipedia:Western world|Western countries]] such as [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]], [[Wikipedia:Australia|Australia]], and the [[Wikipedia:United States|United States]] typically define between 1% and 10% of the general population, which an average around 5%, as homosexual or bisexual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Accessed December 31, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The British government conducted a country-wide survey in 2005 as part of the [[Wikipedia:Civil_Partnership_Act_2004|''Civil Partnership Act'']]. This study, the only official government study of its kind, stated that 6% of the [[Wikipedia:United Kingdom|United Kingdom]] would be interested in forming a [[Wikipedia:civil union|civil union]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nihe.gov.uk/publications/consultation_documents/Draft%20Policy%20Statement%20on%20SO%20Dec06.pdf Sexual Orientation Policy Statement Draft for Consultation] (pdf)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fandom surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are multiple estimates of the percentage of gays in the furry fandom. It is often thought within the fandom that the number is high, possibly as high as 90%,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; but polls have shown differences in estimation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A 2007 [[Wikipedia:University of California, Davis|University of California at Davis]] study found that 37.3% of respondents were bisexual, 32.7% heterosexual, 25.5% homosexual, and 8% were [[Wikipedia:questioning|uncertain]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://studyf3.livejournal.com/1383.html &amp;quot;Furry Survey Results&amp;quot;] from University of California, Davis: Department of Psychology. Published 2007-05-05. Accessed 2007-05-05.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll used in ''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], showed 25% heterosexual, 19% homosexual, and 48% bisexual out of 360 peopled polled.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Sociology of Furry Fandom]. Retrieved October 19, 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rust concluded that &amp;quot;Truth be told, there are many more homosexual members of the fandom than in general society.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll (of indeterminable date, but before 2005) on the [[IFPL]] used the [[Wikipedia:Kinsey scale|Kinsey scale] to rate the measure of homosexuality in respondents:&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin: 1em 1em 1em 0; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px #aaa solid; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 95%;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #C6E3FF&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 12.9%&lt;br /&gt;
| (63/487)&lt;br /&gt;
| 0 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively heterosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #A7B1EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.3%&lt;br /&gt;
| (89/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 1 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CBABE2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.7%&lt;br /&gt;
| (91/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, more than incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CF71EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 14.8%&lt;br /&gt;
| (72/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| Equally heterosexual and homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #DF99D4&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 11.3% &lt;br /&gt;
| (55/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 4 &lt;br /&gt;
|Predominately homosexual, more than incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #F79FD1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 16.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (78/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 5 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately homosexual, incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #FFB1D8&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 8.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (39/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 6 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively homosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* A 2006 [http://faod.org/ FAOD] poll showed 25% heterosexual, 20% homosexual, and 55% bisexual (out of 44 polled)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://faod.org/index.php?topic=179.0 FAOD Message Board]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furtopia]] poll (open 2003 to present) stated that 53% were heterosexual, 15% gay, and 30% bisexual out of 862 people polled.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://cgi.furtopia.org/cgi-bin/ib311/ikonboard.cgi?s=411086f03c728556d957bd1ffd9b528a;act=ST;f=77;t=9074 Furtopia Message Board] Retrieved September 5, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furry_Survey|poll]] by [[Alex Osaki]] reported that 42.75% were heterosexual, 16.86% were homosexual, 35.29% were bisexual, and 4.71% self-identified as neither.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey.php Furry Poll Results] as of December 30, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Theories===&lt;br /&gt;
One viable theory involves [[Mark Merlino]], a former chair of [[ConFurence]] who co-founded the first furry [[conventions]]. [[Crush Yiff Destroy]] has suggested that Merlino actively recruited alternative lifestylers into the fandom, and that this influences furry demographics to this day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.crushyiffdestroy.com/show/merlino &amp;quot;Journey to the Center of Mark Merlino&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Furries also guess that, since having a [[non-furry]] significant other and raising children may result in a fan having less time and money to devote to the fandom, gays are over-represented because they are less likely to be raising children.{{fact}} Some speculate that the negative [[Wikipedia:social stigma|social stigma]] [[Wikipedia:Furry fandom#Media coverage|attached to the fandom]] keeps away heterosexual [[mundanes]] who would otherwise feel interested. David Rust has stated that &amp;quot;The social variations for Furries may seem unusual from a generic, American viewpoint. However, from the position of a group of people who are already predisposed to enjoying anthropomorphic animals, other concepts such as homosexuality... seem somewhat mundane and unimportant by comparison.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Others guess that gays are not over-represented, but that they are simply much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow fans than they are in other areas of their life.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
One other theory is that the demographics of the fandom is reasonably close to the general population. It just happens that people who become furries, a [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']] of sorts, become more exposed to alternate lifestyles and may reconsider their own sexuality, which might result in a paralell [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']].{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:gay|'Gay']] at [[Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Relationship terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sociology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation</id>
		<title>Sexual orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-02T00:15:17Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: /* General surveys */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Gay_flag.png|right|thumb|150px|The rainbow flag associated with [[wikipedia:homosexuality|homosexuality]] in and out of the [[furry fandom|fandom]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sexual preference''' describes the gender or genders that someone feels sexually attracted to. The term [[wikipedia:Sexual_orientation|'''sexual orientation''']] is often used interchangably, but the term 'sexual preference' is more broad and includes personal attitudes in between the three general categories defined as [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientations]]. [[Wikipedia:Heterosexuality|'''Heterosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the opposite gender. [[Wikipedia:Bisexuality|'''Bisexuality''']] is the sexual attraction to members of both sexes, [[male]] and [[female]]. [[wikipedia:homosexuality|'''Homosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the same gender. '''Gay''' is often used synonymously, although the term generally refers to [[male|male/male]] relationships, as compared with '''lesbian''' for [[female|female/female]] relationships. '''Gay''' is sometimes used to refer to both homosexuals and bisexuals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[non-furry|Non-furries]] generally take the position that a significantly larger proportion of the [[furry fandom]] is gay or bisexual compared to the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; A lack of completely reliable survey data exists within both the fandom&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The studies that have been done suggest that this is true, though not to the large extent that is often suggested.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Furries have suggested various theories for this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Categorization==&lt;br /&gt;
The current [[Wikipedia:scientific consensus|scientific consensus]] advocated by various social and educational organizations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;such as the [[Wikipedia:American Psychiatric Association|American Psychiatric Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Psychological Association|American Psychological Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Counseling Association|American Counseling Association]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of Social Workers|National Association of Social Workers]], the [[Wikipedia:American Academy of Pediatrics|American Academy of Pediatrics]], the [[Wikipedia:American Association of School Administrators|American Association of School Administrators]], the [[Wikipedia:American Federation of Teachers|American Federation of Teachers]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of School Psychologists|National Association of School Psychologists]], and the [[Wikipedia:National Education Association|National Education Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is that people develop their own permanent, unchangeable [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientation]] within one of the three categories in their [[Wikipedia:childhood|early childhood]] as [[Wikipedia:Biology and sexual orientation|a combination of genetic tendencies and their social environment]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/publications/justthefacts.html Just the Facts About Sexual Orientation &amp;amp; Youth: A Primer for Principals, Educators and School Personnel] 1999, American Psychological Association&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minority of researchers, sometimes known as [[Wikipedia:Queer theory|'queer theorists']], believe that the concept of sexual orientations is a [[Wikipedia:social construct|social construct]] and that people naturally exhibit a variety of attractions. Some furries also subscribe to this view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pressedfur.coolfreepages.com/essay/postvixen/index.html &amp;quot;Sitting On the Third Side of the Fence&amp;quot;] by Hannah Kincaid from [[Pressed Fur]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although he did not advocate the social construct theory, [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey]] stated that &amp;quot;[[Males]] do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual... The living world is a continuum in each and every one of its aspects.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-hhscale.html &amp;quot;Kinsey's Heterosexual-Homosexual Rating Scale&amp;quot;] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He postulated a [[Wikipedia:Kinsey Scale|scale]] of sexual preferences from zero to six, zero being exclusively heterosexual.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social attitudes among furries==&lt;br /&gt;
''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], found that &amp;quot;race, religion and sexual orientation (as divisive factors) are simply too minor to attract any real attention&amp;quot; and that furries have &amp;quot;higher tolerance for variety in sexual orientation and activity&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A small yet significant minority of furries self-identify as [[Christian furs|Christian]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Some of them believe in the [[Wikipedia:the bible and homosexuality|traditional Christian view]] that homosexual conduct is immoral and that homosexuals should be [[Wikipedia:celibacy|celibate]]. Other [[Christian furs]] believe that the Bible verses and [[Wikipedia:sacred tradition|sacred traditions]] cited against homosexuality are misinterpreted.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark The furries of 'Rainbow Ark'] [http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark/profile take this view]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Both sides maintain a cordial relationship with each other and try to promote mutual understanding.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; [http://www.gaychristian.net/greatdebate.php This website] summarizes the arguments in the debate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===General surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimates of the incidence of homosexuality in the general population vary greatly, due in part to the lack of reliable survey data and the difficulty in defining [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_orientation sexual orientations].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Retrieved September 28th, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey's]] work ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male|Sexual Behavior in the Human Male]]'' found that &amp;quot;46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or &amp;quot;reacted to&amp;quot; persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives&amp;quot;. In addition, the book stated that &amp;quot;10% of males in the sample were predominantly homosexual between the ages of 16 and 55&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html Research Summary] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Kinsey's book, and its companion ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Female|Sexual Behavior in the Human Female]]'', have received [[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male#Criticism|vocal criticism]] for their findings and methodology.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/reisman.html &amp;quot;Kinsey and the Homosexual Revolution&amp;quot;] by [[Wikipedia: Judith Reisman|Dr. Judith Reisman]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.swlearning.com/quant/kohler/stat/biographical_sketches/bio15.1.html Biography of Statician] [[Wikipedia:John Tukey|John W. Tukey]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Human Events|Human Events]] calls the Kinsey Report the fourth [http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=7591 Most Harmful Book of the 19th and 20th Centuries].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''[[Wikipedia:The New York Times|The New York Times]]'' called his research &amp;quot;conscientious and comprehensive&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pomeroy, Wardell (1972). Dr. Kinsey and the Institute for Sex Research. New York: Harper &amp;amp; Row.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Professor [[Wikipedia:Martin Duberman|Martin Duberman]] called it &amp;quot;skillful&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;a monumental endeavor&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[Book review of] '''[http://www.amazon.com/Alfred-C-Kinsey-Public-Private/dp/0393040860 Alfred C. Kinsey : A Public/Private Life]''' originally published in ''[[Wikipedia:The Nation|The Nation]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several recent surveys done in [[Wikipedia:Western world|Western countries]] such as [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]], [[Wikipedia:Australia|Australia]], and the [[Wikipedia:United States|United States]] typically define between 1% and 10% of the general population, which an average around 5%, as homosexual or bisexual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Accessed December 31, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The British government conducted a country-wide survey in 2005 as part of the [[Wikipedia:Civil_Partnership_Act_2004|''Civil Partnership Act'']]. This study, the only official government study of its kind, stated that 6% of the [[Wikipedia:United Kingdom|United Kingdom]] would be interested in forming a [[Wikipedia:civil union|civil union]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nihe.gov.uk/publications/consultation_documents/Draft%20Policy%20Statement%20on%20SO%20Dec06.pdf Sexual Orientation Policy Statement Draft for Consultation] (pdf)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fandom surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are multiple estimates of the percentage of gays in the furry fandom. It is often thought within the fandom that the number is high, possibly as high as 90%,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; but polls have shown differences in estimation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A 2007 [[Wikipedia:University of California, Davis|University of California at Davis]] study found that 37.3% of respondents were bisexual, 32.7% heterosexual, 25.5% homosexual, and 8% were [[Wikipedia:questioning|uncertain]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://studyf3.livejournal.com/1383.html &amp;quot;Furry Survey Results&amp;quot;] from University of California, Davis: Department of Psychology. Published 2007-05-05. Accessed 2007-05-05.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll used in ''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], showed 25% heterosexual, 19% homosexual, and 48% bisexual out of 360 peopled polled.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Sociology of Furry Fandom]. Retrieved October 19, 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rust concluded that &amp;quot;Truth be told, there are many more homosexual members of the fandom than in general society.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll (of indeterminable date, but before 2005) on the [[IFPL]] used the [[Wikipedia:Kinsey scale|Kinsey scale] to rate the measure of homosexuality in respondents:&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin: 1em 1em 1em 0; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px #aaa solid; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 95%;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #C6E3FF&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 12.9%&lt;br /&gt;
| (63/487)&lt;br /&gt;
| 0 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively heterosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #A7B1EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.3%&lt;br /&gt;
| (89/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 1 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CBABE2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.7%&lt;br /&gt;
| (91/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, more than incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CF71EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 14.8%&lt;br /&gt;
| (72/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| Equally heterosexual and homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #DF99D4&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 11.3% &lt;br /&gt;
| (55/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 4 &lt;br /&gt;
|Predominately homosexual, more than incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #F79FD1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 16.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (78/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 5 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately homosexual, incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #FFB1D8&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 8.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (39/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 6 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively homosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* A 2006 [http://faod.org/ FAOD] poll showed 25% heterosexual, 20% homosexual, and 55% bisexual (out of 44 polled)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://faod.org/index.php?topic=179.0 FAOD Message Board]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furtopia]] poll (open 2003 to present) stated that 53% were heterosexual, 15% gay, and 30% bisexual out of 862 people polled.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://cgi.furtopia.org/cgi-bin/ib311/ikonboard.cgi?s=411086f03c728556d957bd1ffd9b528a;act=ST;f=77;t=9074 Furtopia Message Board] Retrieved September 5, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furry_Survey|poll]] by [[Alex Osaki]] reported that 42.75% were heterosexual, 16.86% were homosexual, 35.29% were bisexual, and 4.71% self-identified as neither.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey.php Furry Poll Results] as of December 30, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Theories===&lt;br /&gt;
One viable theory involves [[Mark Merlino]], a former chair of [[ConFurence]] who co-founded the first furry [[conventions]]. [[Crush Yiff Destroy]] has suggested that Merlino actively recruited alternative lifestylers into the fandom, and that this influences furry demographics to this day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.crushyiffdestroy.com/show/merlino &amp;quot;Journey to the Center of Mark Merlino&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Furries also guess that, since having a [[non-furry]] significant other and raising children may result in a fan having less time and money to devote to the fandom, gays are over-represented because they are less likely to be raising children.{{fact}} Some speculate that the negative [[Wikipedia:social stigma|social stigma]] [[Wikipedia:Furry fandom#Media coverage|attached to the fandom]] keeps away heterosexual [[mundanes]] who would otherwise feel interested. David Rust has stated that &amp;quot;The social variations for Furries may seem unusual from a generic, American viewpoint. However, from the position of a group of people who are already predisposed to enjoying anthropomorphic animals, other concepts such as homosexuality... seem somewhat mundane and unimportant by comparison.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Others guess that gays are not over-represented, but that they are simply much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow fans than they are in other areas of their life.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
One other theory is that the demographics of the fandom is reasonably close to the general population. It just happens that people who become furries, a [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']] of sorts, become more exposed to alternate lifestyles and may reconsider their own sexuality, which might result in a paralell [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']].{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:gay|'Gay']] at [[Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Relationship terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sociology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation</id>
		<title>Sexual orientation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Sexual_orientation"/>
				<updated>2008-01-02T00:14:36Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Gay_flag.png|right|thumb|150px|The rainbow flag associated with [[wikipedia:homosexuality|homosexuality]] in and out of the [[furry fandom|fandom]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sexual preference''' describes the gender or genders that someone feels sexually attracted to. The term [[wikipedia:Sexual_orientation|'''sexual orientation''']] is often used interchangably, but the term 'sexual preference' is more broad and includes personal attitudes in between the three general categories defined as [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientations]]. [[Wikipedia:Heterosexuality|'''Heterosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the opposite gender. [[Wikipedia:Bisexuality|'''Bisexuality''']] is the sexual attraction to members of both sexes, [[male]] and [[female]]. [[wikipedia:homosexuality|'''Homosexuality''']] describes an attraction to someone of the same gender. '''Gay''' is often used synonymously, although the term generally refers to [[male|male/male]] relationships, as compared with '''lesbian''' for [[female|female/female]] relationships. '''Gay''' is sometimes used to refer to both homosexuals and bisexuals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[non-furry|Non-furries]] generally take the position that a significantly larger proportion of the [[furry fandom]] is gay or bisexual compared to the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; A lack of completely reliable survey data exists within both the fandom&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and the general population.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The studies that have been done suggest that this is true, though not to the large extent that is often suggested.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Furries have suggested various theories for this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Categorization==&lt;br /&gt;
The current [[Wikipedia:scientific consensus|scientific consensus]] advocated by various social and educational organizations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;such as the [[Wikipedia:American Psychiatric Association|American Psychiatric Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Psychological Association|American Psychological Association]], the [[Wikipedia:American Counseling Association|American Counseling Association]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of Social Workers|National Association of Social Workers]], the [[Wikipedia:American Academy of Pediatrics|American Academy of Pediatrics]], the [[Wikipedia:American Association of School Administrators|American Association of School Administrators]], the [[Wikipedia:American Federation of Teachers|American Federation of Teachers]], the [[Wikipedia:National Association of School Psychologists|National Association of School Psychologists]], and the [[Wikipedia:National Education Association|National Education Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is that people develop their own permanent, unchangeable [[Wikipedia:sexual orientation|sexual orientation]] within one of the three categories in their [[Wikipedia:childhood|early childhood]] as [[Wikipedia:Biology and sexual orientation|a combination of genetic tendencies and their social environment]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/publications/justthefacts.html Just the Facts About Sexual Orientation &amp;amp; Youth: A Primer for Principals, Educators and School Personnel] 1999, American Psychological Association&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A minority of researchers, sometimes known as [[Wikipedia:Queer theory|'queer theorists']], believe that the concept of sexual orientations is a [[Wikipedia:social construct|social construct]] and that people naturally exhibit a variety of attractions. Some furries also subscribe to this view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pressedfur.coolfreepages.com/essay/postvixen/index.html &amp;quot;Sitting On the Third Side of the Fence&amp;quot;] by Hannah Kincaid from [[Pressed Fur]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although he did not advocate the social construct theory, [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey]] stated that &amp;quot;[[Males]] do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual... The living world is a continuum in each and every one of its aspects.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-hhscale.html &amp;quot;Kinsey's Heterosexual-Homosexual Rating Scale&amp;quot;] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He postulated a [[Wikipedia:Kinsey Scale|scale]] of sexual preferences from zero to six, zero being exclusively heterosexual.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;scale&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social attitudes among furries==&lt;br /&gt;
''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], found that &amp;quot;race, religion and sexual orientation (as divisive factors) are simply too minor to attract any real attention&amp;quot; and that furries have &amp;quot;higher tolerance for variety in sexual orientation and activity&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A small yet significant minority of furries self-identify as [[Christian furs|Christian]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Some of them believe in the [[Wikipedia:the bible and homosexuality|traditional Christian view]] that homosexual conduct is immoral and that homosexuals should be [[Wikipedia:celibacy|celibate]]. Other [[Christian furs]] believe that the Bible verses and [[Wikipedia:sacred tradition|sacred traditions]] cited against homosexuality are misinterpreted.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark The furries of 'Rainbow Ark'] [http://community.livejournal.com/rainbow_ark/profile take this view]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Both sides maintain a cordial relationship with each other and try to promote mutual understanding.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ark&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; [http://www.gaychristian.net/greatdebate.php This website] summarizes the arguments in the debate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why does it seem that many furries are homosexual or bisexual?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===General surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimates of the incidence of homosexuality in the general population vary greatly, due in part to the lack of reliable survey data and the difficulty in defining [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_orientation sexual orientations].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Retrieved September 28th, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Wikipedia:Alfred Kinsey|Dr. Alfred Kinsey's]] work ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male|Sexual Behavior in the Human Male]]'' found that &amp;quot;46% of the male population had engaged in both heterosexual and homosexual activities, or &amp;quot;reacted to&amp;quot; persons of both sexes, in the course of their adult lives&amp;quot;. In addition, the book stated that &amp;quot;10% of males in the sample were predominantly homosexual between the ages of 16 and 55&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html Research Summary] from the [http://www.kinseyinstitute.org Kinsey Institute].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Kinsey's book, and its companion ''[[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Female|Sexual Behavior in the Human Female]]'', have received [[Wikipedia:Sexual Behavior in the Human Male#Criticism|vocal criticism]] for their findings and methodology.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/reisman.html &amp;quot;Kinsey and the Homosexual Revolution&amp;quot;] by [[Wikipedia: Judith Reisman|Dr. Judith Reisman]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.swlearning.com/quant/kohler/stat/biographical_sketches/bio15.1.html Biography of Statician] [[Wikipedia:John Tukey|John W. Tukey]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Human Events|Human Events]] calls the Kinsey Report the fourth [http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=7591 Most Harmful Book of the 19th and 20th Centuries].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''[[Wikipedia:The New York Times|The New York Times]]'' called his research &amp;quot;conscientious and comprehensive&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pomeroy, Wardell (1972). Dr. Kinsey and the Institute for Sex Research. New York: Harper &amp;amp; Row.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Professor [[Wikipedia:Martin Duberman]|Martin Duberman]] called it &amp;quot;skillful&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;a monumental endeavor&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[Book review of] '''[http://www.amazon.com/Alfred-C-Kinsey-Public-Private/dp/0393040860 Alfred C. Kinsey : A Public/Private Life]''' originally published in ''[[Wikipedia:The Nation|The Nation]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several recent surveys done in [[Wikipedia:Western world|Western countries]] such as [[Wikipedia:Canada|Canada]], [[Wikipedia:Australia|Australia]], and the [[Wikipedia:United States|United States]] typically define between 1% and 10% of the general population, which an average around 5%, as homosexual or bisexual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Demographics of sexual orientation|Demographics of sexual orientation]] at [[Wikipedia]]. Accessed December 31, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The British government conducted a country-wide survey in 2005 as part of the [[Wikipedia:Civil_Partnership_Act_2004|''Civil Partnership Act'']]. This study, the only official government study of its kind, stated that 6% of the [[Wikipedia:United Kingdom|United Kingdom]] would be interested in forming a [[Wikipedia:civil union|civil union]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nihe.gov.uk/publications/consultation_documents/Draft%20Policy%20Statement%20on%20SO%20Dec06.pdf Sexual Orientation Policy Statement Draft for Consultation] (pdf)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fandom surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are multiple estimates of the percentage of gays in the furry fandom. It is often thought within the fandom that the number is high, possibly as high as 90%,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; but polls have shown differences in estimation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A 2007 [[Wikipedia:University of California, Davis|University of California at Davis]] study found that 37.3% of respondents were bisexual, 32.7% heterosexual, 25.5% homosexual, and 8% were [[Wikipedia:questioning|uncertain]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://studyf3.livejournal.com/1383.html &amp;quot;Furry Survey Results&amp;quot;] from University of California, Davis: Department of Psychology. Published 2007-05-05. Accessed 2007-05-05.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll used in ''[[The Sociology of Furry Fandom]]'', a 2002 paper by [[David J. Rust]] hosted at [http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Darken Hollow], showed 25% heterosexual, 19% homosexual, and 48% bisexual out of 360 peopled polled.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.visi.com/~phantos/furrysoc.html The Sociology of Furry Fandom]. Retrieved October 19, 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rust concluded that &amp;quot;Truth be told, there are many more homosexual members of the fandom than in general society.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A poll (of indeterminable date, but before 2005) on the [[IFPL]] used the [[Wikipedia:Kinsey scale|Kinsey scale] to rate the measure of homosexuality in respondents:&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin: 1em 1em 1em 0; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px #aaa solid; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 95%;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #C6E3FF&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 12.9%&lt;br /&gt;
| (63/487)&lt;br /&gt;
| 0 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively heterosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #A7B1EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.3%&lt;br /&gt;
| (89/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 1 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CBABE2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18.7%&lt;br /&gt;
| (91/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately heterosexual, more than incidentally homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #CF71EE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 14.8%&lt;br /&gt;
| (72/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 3&lt;br /&gt;
| Equally heterosexual and homosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #DF99D4&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 11.3% &lt;br /&gt;
| (55/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 4 &lt;br /&gt;
|Predominately homosexual, more than incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #F79FD1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 16.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (78/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 5 &lt;br /&gt;
| Predominately homosexual, incidentally heterosexual &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color:  #FFB1D8&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 8.0%&lt;br /&gt;
| (39/487) &lt;br /&gt;
| 6 &lt;br /&gt;
| Exclusively homosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
* A 2006 [http://faod.org/ FAOD] poll showed 25% heterosexual, 20% homosexual, and 55% bisexual (out of 44 polled)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://faod.org/index.php?topic=179.0 FAOD Message Board]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furtopia]] poll (open 2003 to present) stated that 53% were heterosexual, 15% gay, and 30% bisexual out of 862 people polled.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://cgi.furtopia.org/cgi-bin/ib311/ikonboard.cgi?s=411086f03c728556d957bd1ffd9b528a;act=ST;f=77;t=9074 Furtopia Message Board] Retrieved September 5, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A [[Furry_Survey|poll]] by [[Alex Osaki]] reported that 42.75% were heterosexual, 16.86% were homosexual, 35.29% were bisexual, and 4.71% self-identified as neither.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.klisoura.com/ot_furrysurvey.php Furry Poll Results] as of December 30, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Theories===&lt;br /&gt;
One viable theory involves [[Mark Merlino]], a former chair of [[ConFurence]] who co-founded the first furry [[conventions]]. [[Crush Yiff Destroy]] has suggested that Merlino actively recruited alternative lifestylers into the fandom, and that this influences furry demographics to this day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.crushyiffdestroy.com/show/merlino &amp;quot;Journey to the Center of Mark Merlino&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Furries also guess that, since having a [[non-furry]] significant other and raising children may result in a fan having less time and money to devote to the fandom, gays are over-represented because they are less likely to be raising children.{{fact}} Some speculate that the negative [[Wikipedia:social stigma|social stigma]] [[Wikipedia:Furry fandom#Media coverage|attached to the fandom]] keeps away heterosexual [[mundanes]] who would otherwise feel interested. David Rust has stated that &amp;quot;The social variations for Furries may seem unusual from a generic, American viewpoint. However, from the position of a group of people who are already predisposed to enjoying anthropomorphic animals, other concepts such as homosexuality... seem somewhat mundane and unimportant by comparison.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rust&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Others guess that gays are not over-represented, but that they are simply much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow fans than they are in other areas of their life.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
One other theory is that the demographics of the fandom is reasonably close to the general population. It just happens that people who become furries, a [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']] of sorts, become more exposed to alternate lifestyles and may reconsider their own sexuality, which might result in a paralell [[Wikipedia:Coming out|'coming out']].{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:gay|'Gay']] at [[Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Relationship terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sociology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/User_talk:Boingo</id>
		<title>User talk:Boingo</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/User_talk:Boingo"/>
				<updated>2008-01-01T23:31:55Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: Oops. I dicked up the indenting&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Welcome to [[WikiFur]]! Thank you for registering an account. We here at [[WikiFur]] look forward to working with you. [[Forum:Help desk|Let us know]] if you need any [[help]] not already provided. If you would like help creating an article or just editing it, don't hesitate to consult the [[Help:Furry Book of Style|Furry Book of Style]] or just contact an [[WikiFur:Administrator|administrator]]. Have a nice day! :-)&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Rat|Rat]] 01:24, 24 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How do you mess with the colors/shading on a wiki table? I proposed something like that for [[Talk:Homosexuality|this page]]. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 07:49, 27 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Same as on a normal HTML table, except that there are certain limitations to prevent problems (most notably, you can't set an image as a background unless you do so via sitewide CSS). Probably what you would find most useful is the background-color style. Have a look at any HTML tutorial out there and you should find some tips on HTML tables that you can put to use here. You might also find [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Table Help:Table] useful. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:05, 27 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I made my proposed changes. [[Homosexuality|What do you think?]] [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 01:24, 28 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thought the colours were a little strong, so I tweaked them so that the text was more readable. You can do unordered lists using * at the front.  --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== These might be stupid questions... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
but I still would like to ask:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Is it always unacceptable to add a link to [[[encyclopedia dramatica]] to a page (Looking something like this: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Aeris A satrical take on the 'Mary Sue' phenomenon]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;), or does it depend on the circumstances?&lt;br /&gt;
*What's the policy on using someone's real, birth-cirtificate listed name in their biographical article?&lt;br /&gt;
*What's the policy on using real life pictures in biographical articles?&lt;br /&gt;
*Since they're so short and they don't really have any prospects for more content, shouldn't the articles '[[bisexual]]' and '[[heterosexual]]' be merged into '[[homosexual]]' to create '[[sexual preference]]'?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 05:03, 29 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:All content decisions are made on a case by case basis. However, ED rarely makes a good link, due to its habit of putting a highly negative spin on any subject that it covers (except for those which result in the glorification of drama). Its editors are also quite willing to make things up if doing so results in &amp;quot;lulz&amp;quot;. For these reasons and others, linking to ED is strongly discouraged, and I would advise you to treat anything you find there with caution. For the specific example you give, there seems no reason not to just use an interwiki link to Wikipedia, which has a perfectly good article on the topic. We would not need to have a separate article as it is not a furry topic.&lt;br /&gt;
:Our policy with birth names is to look at whether or not that name is being concealed in any way. For example, many artists actually go by their real names. Others use fan names alongside their real names. Still others make no mention of their real names, even on the websites containing their work. In the latter case, the use of the real name (if you know it) is probably not appropriate. Real names will usually be removed on request from the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
:The same thing goes for real life pictures. If you know, or have reason to believe that someone would not want their picture on WikiFur, it is probably best not to put it here. On the other hand, many people do not mind, and it can be a useful means of identification.&lt;br /&gt;
:Don't really have an opinion on the last. If you think doing so would make a better encyclopedia, you should do so. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:24, 29 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I made the changes. I'd like to ask you some things about the [[sexual preference]] page.&lt;br /&gt;
*I wrote a snippet saying that some people think that sexual orientation is an artificial construct and does not really exist. But I don't know of any furries advocating that position besides the one person that I linked.&lt;br /&gt;
*I altered the colors on the table so it has the holistic, ying-yang style of intermixed pink and blue. I tried to lighten the colors a lot compared to my first try at it. How does it look now?&lt;br /&gt;
*I wrote a section saying that a cordial split exists among Christian furs between those who believe homosexuality is immoral and those who disagree. Is this accurate? Or do all (or nearly all) of the Christian furries accept homosexuality? The only anti-gay-marriage furry that I know of is [[Prince Jeremy]].*&lt;br /&gt;
*I'd like to find citations for the theories saying ''since having a [[non-furry]] significant other and raising children may result in a fan having less time and money to devote to the fandom, gays are over-represented because they are less likely to be raising children'' and ''Others guess that gays are not over-represented, but that they are simply much more likely to be open about their sexual orientation among their fellow fans than they are in other areas of their life.''&lt;br /&gt;
*One other theory is that the demographics of the fandom is reasonably close to the general population. It just happens that people who become furries (a 'coming out' of sorts) become more exposed to alternate lifestyles (which might result in a paralell 'coming out'). I considered adding this to the article, but I didn't because it seems overly speculative.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 07:32, 31 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;Based on his infamous &amp;quot;you all belong in concentration camps&amp;quot; comment. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 23:44, 31 December 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have made [http://furry.wikia.com/index.php?title=Sexual_preference&amp;amp;diff=177377&amp;amp;oldid=177376 further edits]. Some general points:&lt;br /&gt;
:*If you are intending to move one page to another title, use the Move tab at the top rather than cut and pasting. Doing the latter breaks the edit history, and deprives others of the credit for their prior edits, which is required for [[WikiFur:Copyrights|GFDL]] compliance.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Link to Wikipedia by using &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Article name|text to display]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Per the [[WikiFur:Furry Book of Style|style guide]], only the first word of titles should be capitalized unless the word would normally be capitalized (like a name).&lt;br /&gt;
:*Use a spellchecker. :-) If you use a [http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-beta.html recent beta of Firefox] it will have one built in.&lt;br /&gt;
:To answer your questions:&lt;br /&gt;
:*The table looks fine to me.&lt;br /&gt;
:*I suspect there are some who are less than enthused about it, but I do not know for sure. You could always ask the community of Christian furs (or see if the question has been asked already). Jeremy would be an outlier for most purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
:*I'm not sure you can really get a citation for that, but you could give examples of involvement in such activities. For example, very significant proportions of the leadership at [[convention]]s and other furry events are gay, including key members of (at least) [[List of conventions by attendance|the top five event by attendance]], as well as the larger ones overseas. I should note that leadership in this area is not exclusive - as far as I know, there is no &amp;quot;anti-breeder&amp;quot; bias - but if you look closely it is a very clear trend. It might be because gay community members are more interested in organizing communal events. I don't know.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Possible. I think the current situation is a combination of this effect and others. Again, more research is required. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I apologize for messing up the move (I only did it once before in my Wikipedia days). I didn't realize how to use the Wikilink code until I was about halfway through editing the page; I'll use it the correct way in the future.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''I suspect there are some who are less than enthused about it, but I do not know for sure. You could always ask the community of Christian furs'' I've read a lot of furries' livejournals but I don't have one myself (and- to be honest with you- I really do not want one, especially after reading several &amp;quot;if I see him again, I'll rip his f*cking throat out&amp;quot; posts.) Has [[Kendricks]] been editing on Wikifur recently? Could I ask him on his talk page?&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''Jeremy would be an outlier for most purposes.'' I don't know what you mean by &amp;quot;outlier&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''as far as I know, there is no &amp;quot;anti-breeder&amp;quot; bias - but if you look closely it is a very clear trend'' I don't know what &amp;quot;anti-breeder&amp;quot; means. I'm a compete noob, so I don't know the furry lexicon (Please resist the urge to choke my neck with your mind as you type your response).&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''Possible. I think the current situation is a combination of this effect and others. Again, more research is required.'' I see. I think the [[Sexual_preference#Theories|theories section]] does a good job of describing every viewpoint. [[User:Boingo|Boingo]] 23:15, 1 January 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Kendricks</id>
		<title>Kendricks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Kendricks"/>
				<updated>2008-01-01T23:15:52Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Boingo: Redirecting to Kendricks Redtail&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Kendricks Redtail]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Boingo</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>