<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://en.wikifur.com/w/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://en.wikifur.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=65.91.54.146</id>
		<title>WikiFur - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.wikifur.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=65.91.54.146"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/65.91.54.146"/>
		<updated>2026-10-18T06:35:52Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.23.16</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Pauli_Kidd</id>
		<title>Talk:Pauli Kidd</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Pauli_Kidd"/>
				<updated>2006-01-22T07:41:25Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;65.91.54.146: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Why the inclusion of this Court matter?. It's controversy, yes, but we normally just add this type of information in if it involves Furry Fandom in any way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He's not a felon, or a troublemaker, so it can not be used to show &amp;quot;Bad Character.&amp;quot; This is a civil case, involving personal matter by the looks of it, and, by google it in, seems to be used mainly as harassment material against this individual by third parties. Rereading it again, it still brings no historical, anecdotal, or contributing value to the entry. [[User:65.91.54.146|65.91.54.146]] 02:56, 22 January 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Going back through the article's &amp;quot;History&amp;quot; just answered my own personal question of &amp;quot;Why is this even here?&amp;quot;... Gentleman #68.13.158.223 is the principal &amp;quot;motivator&amp;quot; for the use of this civil information as just harassment material. [[User:65.91.54.146|65.91.54.146]] 03:04, 22 January 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, I rewrote it, so I should explain why.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I believe the matter does involve the furry fandom, at least in part:&lt;br /&gt;
::*Paul is a noted (and I believe respected) individual of the fandom&lt;br /&gt;
::*Part of the material concerned was apparently of a furry nature - if not the stuff they found on the computer (which was probably [[anime]] from the description), then certainly other material that they would have considered in their investigation&lt;br /&gt;
::*The matter was discussed at length on alt.fan.furry - and, as you say, used as ammunition in a personal battle by the original contributor against someone who wasn't even there. I think this reflects more on the person concerned than anything else.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Whether it involves the fandom ''enough'' to keep it is another matter. I wrote the section partly out of fairness to the other member of the fandom who has had a similar writeup ([[Sibe]]). If the general opinion is that it does not belong here, I will not challenge anyone who decides to remove it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::(I would note that at least the first of Sibe's court cases was actually ''less'' related to the fandom than this one. If we drop this one, it might be appropriate to drop that one as well, which occurred nearly four years ago now. I would urge reconsideration of any rule that applies only to people who have &amp;quot;bad character&amp;quot;.) --{{UT|GreenReaper}} 04:08, 22 January 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Good points (And I was thinking the same dilemma that would involve the Sibe angle,) so I will see how others admins and contributors feel about this matter, but, in the mean time, I would like to make the change to rename the section to &amp;quot;Controversy,&amp;quot; as we have done before in the past to contain such information under. [[User:65.91.54.146|65.91.54.146]] 04:31, 22 January 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I'm glad to see you didn't wait for my reply. As I say to others, '''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages|be bold]]'''! :-) --{{UT|GreenReaper}} 06:08, 22 January 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Uh?,... No, no, actually I opened both pages at the same time (I was going to change the heading anyways to &amp;quot;Controversy&amp;quot;,)...Just clicked them almost at the same time. Article won. [[User:65.91.54.146|65.91.54.146]] 07:41, 22 January 2006 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>65.91.54.146</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Pauli_Kidd</id>
		<title>Talk:Pauli Kidd</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Pauli_Kidd"/>
				<updated>2006-01-22T04:31:28Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;65.91.54.146: Thoughts&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Why the inclusion of this Court matter?. It's controversy, yes, but we normally just add this type of information in if it involves Furry Fandom in any way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He's not a felon, or a troublemaker, so it can not be used to show &amp;quot;Bad Character.&amp;quot; This is a civil case, involving personal matter by the looks of it, and, by google it in, seems to be used mainly as harassment material against this individual by third parties. Rereading it again, it still brings no historical, anecdotal, or contributing value to the entry. [[User:65.91.54.146|65.91.54.146]] 02:56, 22 January 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Going back through the article's &amp;quot;History&amp;quot; just answered my own personal question of &amp;quot;Why is this even here?&amp;quot;... Gentleman #68.13.158.223 is the principal &amp;quot;motivator&amp;quot; for the use of this civil information as just harassment material. [[User:65.91.54.146|65.91.54.146]] 03:04, 22 January 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, I rewrote it, so I should explain why.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I believe the matter does involve the furry fandom, at least in part:&lt;br /&gt;
::*Paul is a noted (and I believe respected) individual of the fandom&lt;br /&gt;
::*Part of the material concerned was apparently of a furry nature - if not the stuff they found on the computer (which was probably [[anime]] from the description), then certainly other material that they would have considered in their investigation&lt;br /&gt;
::*The matter was discussed at length on alt.fan.furry - and, as you say, used as ammunition in a personal battle by the original contributor against someone who wasn't even there. I think this reflects more on the person concerned than anything else.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Whether it involves the fandom ''enough'' to keep it is another matter. I wrote the section partly out of fairness to the other member of the fandom who has had a similar writeup ([[Sibe]]). If the general opinion is that it does not belong here, I will not challenge anyone who decides to remove it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::(I would note that at least the first of Sibe's court cases was actually ''less'' related to the fandom than this one. If we drop this one, it might be appropriate to drop that one as well, which occurred nearly four years ago now. I would urge reconsideration of any rule that applies only to people who have &amp;quot;bad character&amp;quot;.) --{{UT|GreenReaper}} 04:08, 22 January 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Good points (And I was thinking the same dilemma that would involve the Sibe angle,) so I will see how others admins and contributors feel about this matter, but, in the mean time, I would like to make the change to rename the section to &amp;quot;Controversy,&amp;quot; as we have done before in the past to contain such information under. [[User:65.91.54.146|65.91.54.146]] 04:31, 22 January 2006 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>65.91.54.146</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Pauli_Kidd</id>
		<title>Talk:Pauli Kidd</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Pauli_Kidd"/>
				<updated>2006-01-22T03:04:55Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;65.91.54.146: Ah&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Why the inclusion of this Court matter?. It's controversy, yes, but we normally just add this type of information in if it involves Furry Fandom in any way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He's not a felon, or a troublemaker, so it can not be used to show &amp;quot;Bad Character.&amp;quot; This is a civil case, involving personal matter by the looks of it, and, by google it in, seems to be used mainly as harassment material against this individual by third parties. Rereading it again, it still brings no historical, anecdotal, or contributing value to the entry. [[User:65.91.54.146|65.91.54.146]] 02:56, 22 January 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Going back through the article's &amp;quot;History&amp;quot; just answered my own personal question of &amp;quot;Why is this even here?&amp;quot;... Gentleman #68.13.158.223 is the principal &amp;quot;motivator&amp;quot; for the use of this civil information as just harassment material. [[User:65.91.54.146|65.91.54.146]] 03:04, 22 January 2006 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>65.91.54.146</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Pauli_Kidd</id>
		<title>Talk:Pauli Kidd</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Pauli_Kidd"/>
				<updated>2006-01-22T02:56:27Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;65.91.54.146: Question value of Civil Case addition.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Why the inclusion of this Court matter?. It's controversy, yes, but we normally just add this type of information in if it involves Furry Fandom in any way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He's not a felon, or a troublemaker, so it can not be used to show &amp;quot;Bad Character.&amp;quot; This is a civil case, involving personal matter by the looks of it, and, by google it in, seems to be used mainly as harassment material against this individual by third parties. Rereading it again, it still brings no historical, anecdotal, or contributing value to the entry. [[User:65.91.54.146|65.91.54.146]] 02:56, 22 January 2006 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>65.91.54.146</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Milfur</id>
		<title>Milfur</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Milfur"/>
				<updated>2006-01-22T02:31:45Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;65.91.54.146: Expanded, added Wikipedia links, +external link.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Milfur''' (also known as '''Military Fur''') is a term to describe any [[furry]], or fan of furry interests, that is a present or former, active or reserve, member of a branch of a country's [[Wikipedia:Military|military]] or [[Wikipedia:Armed_forces|armed forces]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Initially used to describe any furry personnel serving as an [[wikipedia:USA|United States]]' [[wikipedia:Marines|Marines]], [[Wikipedia:Us_navy|Navy]], [[Wikipedia:Us_Army|Army]], [[Wikipedia:Us_air_force|Air Force]] or [[Wikipedia:US_Coast_Guard|Coast Guard]] member, this was later expanded to include furs serving, or discharged, from any military force from around the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://community.livejournal.com/militaryfurries/ Military Furries] A milfur [[Livejournal]] community.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://groups.google.com/group/alt.lifestyle.furry/browse_frm/thread/25c6df65bfebfaeb/1d4dc6c7412325dd?lnk=st&amp;amp;q=milfur+fur&amp;amp;rnum=3&amp;amp;hl=en#1d4dc6c7412325dd A &amp;quot;Milfur&amp;quot; reference] on [[alt.lifestyle.furry]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Terms]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>65.91.54.146</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Milfur</id>
		<title>Milfur</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Milfur"/>
				<updated>2006-01-22T01:55:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;65.91.54.146: /* External links */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Milfur''' (aka '''Military Fur''') is a term to describe any [[Furry]] or fan of [[Furry]] art, that is a present, or former, Active or Reserve, member of a branch of the Military. Initially used to describe any member of the United States' [[Marines]], [[Navy]], [[Army]], [[Air Force]] or [[Coast Guard]] branches, this was later extended to cover Furs serving, or discharged, from any Military force from all over the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://community.livejournal.com/militaryfurries/ Military Furries] A milfur [[Livejournal]] community.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://groups.google.com/group/alt.lifestyle.furry/browse_frm/thread/25c6df65bfebfaeb/1d4dc6c7412325dd?lnk=st&amp;amp;q=milfur+fur&amp;amp;rnum=3&amp;amp;hl=en#1d4dc6c7412325dd A &amp;quot;Milfur&amp;quot; reference] on [[alt.lifestyle.furry]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Terms]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>65.91.54.146</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Mik_Genocide</id>
		<title>Mik Genocide</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Mik_Genocide"/>
				<updated>2006-01-22T00:00:56Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;65.91.54.146: Revert to prior edit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Mik Genocide''' (aka '''BlitzFerret''', '''SmackHead-Mik''') is an antagonistic psychopathic [[ferret]]. He is the frontman for a furry punk band called [[Arc Of Vomit]], and can often be found in IRC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{person-stub}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://blitzferret.deviantart.com/ BltzFerret's page] at [[deviantART]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://myspace.com/arcofvomit Arc Of Vomit]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People]][[Category:Musicians]][[Category:Ferret characters]][[Category:Vermont]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>65.91.54.146</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>