Talk:Pornography

2014-07-05T01:56:21Z

2602:306:250B:57D9:B562:5CFE:BCA2:5C9D: /* Legality */

{{FAC}}

Hmm, should the "Pornography in furry fandom" section of [[Pornography]] be moved to [[Furotica]] ? --[[User:EarthFurst|EarthFurst]] 06:25, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

:Some people might disagree with something's clasification as one but agree with the other. Is a painting of a nude fox erotic, or pornographic, or both? --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]<sup>([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])</sup> 15:39, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
:::"Pornography": Any piece you lose interest in as soon as you orgasm. [[User:733|733]]
:::: Heh. That's a bit blunt, but basically true, I think. --[[User:Dmuth|Douglas Muth]] 21:06, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

As a point of thought -- why this particular picture to describe pornography? Why a picture at all? I don't think I agree with it... --[[User:IanKeith|IanKeith]] 22:35, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
:It was under a free license and near the top of the category gallery. --[[User:Rat|Rat]] 04:39, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
== Re: Possible nomination for Featured Page ==

I just can't bring myself to agree with this. It's also definitely not something I want splattered on the front page. Surely we have better articles to feature? --[[User:IanKeith|IanKeith]] 22:35, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

:So find them, improve them, [[WikiFur:Featured article candidates|nominate them]]. And put your comments for this on the feature nomination, as linked in the header. :-) --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]<sup>([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])</sup> 04:06, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

==Picture==
Without trying to be too overly blunt, this picture is crap, and is a horrible reference for the entire scope of furry pornography, I suggest getting a random pic off of Fchan, or a random one off of the /c/ board and using it instead (because they are not protected under a specific license on that site) I think it would benefit the page as a whole... {{unsigned|65.191.158.15}}
: I agree, hyper pandess isn't all that hot and a too specific fetish for a general description of porn. {{unsigned|91.96.46.121}}
::I'm not attached to any particular picture being used on this art. But no, pics off an image board aren't free to use. Artists do not give up their copyright unless they explicitly state so. --[[User:Rat|Rat]] 10:45, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

== Where can I view non-gay furry porn? ==

Hi, I'm interested in furry porn. Where can I get decent porn as a heterosexual male? --[[Special:Contributions/93.223.27.40|93.223.27.40]] 12:48, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
:I don't even... *shudder* --[[User:Equivamp|Equivamp]] 15:08, 17 May 2011 (EDT)
:Not really the place to be asking this, but if you go to e621 and search "female," that should work ~~

== Notability? ==

Wouldn't '''Furotica''' (furry term) supersede [[Pornography]] (mainstream term) in article standing?. Just musing (eh, it works) - [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 03:08, 18 May 2013 (EDT)

== Legality ==

I deleted this sentences from the Legality section: "In the United States the Miller Test would classify yiff as having "artistic value" therefore making it a legal form of pornography." because it misinterprets the Miller test. A work of pornorgraphy would have to be (1) very well-drawn or (2) very well-written (i.e. more than just an "excuse plot") to pass. Most pornography you see on the Internet (fur or skin) does not pass and is considered obscene by the U.S. govt, occupying a space of legal ambiguity that is generally not enforced either way. I'm not sure about any other countries. Does anyone have any insight or sources about the legality of yiff or porn in general? [[User:Not-my-username|Not-my-username]] 20:19, 6 October 2013 (EDT)

An "excuse plot" is more than enough to pass the Miller Test, that's why they're there.

WikiFur - User contributions [en]

Talk:Pornography