<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://en.wikifur.com/w/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://en.wikifur.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=24.207.68.7</id>
		<title>WikiFur - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.wikifur.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=24.207.68.7"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/24.207.68.7"/>
		<updated>2026-10-19T02:49:29Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.23.16</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Foxx_(artist)</id>
		<title>Talk:Foxx (artist)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Foxx_(artist)"/>
				<updated>2011-07-05T19:38:06Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;24.207.68.7: /* Gender */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;How many furries have to use the term before it is deemed &amp;quot;established&amp;quot;? I doubt there's a specific number. The term is used on the main page of Foxx's site, under the banner &amp;quot;Gestasis Afflicted Furries&amp;quot; It doesn't show up in a search because it's part of an image. http://foxx.furvect.com/ [[User:DDragon|DDragon]] 07:13, 23 July 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Speedy Del? ==&lt;br /&gt;
I'll vote for it. I've never heard of this term being used. I can understand its origins, but that doesn't really make it a term folks are going to run into very often. That's just my two cents, though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And as an aside to DDragon, a term becoming &amp;quot;established&amp;quot; most likely means when it becomes much more mainstream to hear bandied about. This is an incredibly niche subject, with an incredibly small target, and I don't think that's quite what WikiFur is entirely about. Maybe if it's gained more exposure in the future, it'd be more fitting? Just thought I'd toss that in there. --[[User:IanKeith|IanKeith]] 09:57, 23 July 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gender ==&lt;br /&gt;
Foxx is a guy but the article says &amp;quot;her fursona&amp;quot; Shouldn't you have his full name too?&lt;br /&gt;
~~Are you writing here that it would make it more comfortable for you if the Foxx entry either had &amp;quot;he&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;she&amp;quot; and not both?  Be clear in what you want, m'dear.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>24.207.68.7</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>