<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://en.wikifur.com/w/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://en.wikifur.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=151.196.181.220</id>
		<title>WikiFur - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.wikifur.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=151.196.181.220"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/151.196.181.220"/>
		<updated>2026-10-16T05:26:26Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.23.16</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Hermaphrodite_Haven</id>
		<title>Talk:Hermaphrodite Haven</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Hermaphrodite_Haven"/>
				<updated>2006-01-13T18:01:42Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;151.196.181.220: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I didn't want to link to the [[DragonFire]] article 'cause I don't believe that's the right person.  Great naming system, furries! --[[User:ShrikeWolf|The Shrike]] 13:03, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You are correct in that it links to the wrong person.  I knew the creator of Herm Haven for about 3 years.  Heh, he was my roomate for 8 months even.  The DragonFire of Tapestries (also known as &amp;quot;AsperTorri&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Rhylith&amp;quot; online) lives in Annapolis, MD.  Although there is not much on the web about him (extreme paranoia?), you can indeed confirm this by contacting our mutual friend, Steve Burt (aka &amp;quot;[http://us.vclart.net/vcl/Artists/Steve-Burt/ Rancid]&amp;quot;)  at Zomboi39 at gmail dot com. --[[User:151.196.181.220|151.196.181.220]] 18:00, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>151.196.181.220</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Hermaphrodite_Haven</id>
		<title>Talk:Hermaphrodite Haven</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Hermaphrodite_Haven"/>
				<updated>2006-01-13T18:00:39Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;151.196.181.220: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I didn't want to link to the [[DragonFire]] article 'cause I don't believe that's the right person.  Great naming system, furries! --[[User:ShrikeWolf|The Shrike]] 13:03, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You are correct in that it links to the wrong person.  I knew the creator of Herm Haven for about 3 years.  Heh, he was my roomate for 8 months even.  The DragonFire of Tapestries lives in Annapolis, MD.  Although there is not much on the web about him (extreme paranoia?), you can indeed confirm this by contacting our mutual friend, Steve Burt (aka &amp;quot;[http://us.vclart.net/vcl/Artists/Steve-Burt/ Rancid]&amp;quot;)  at Zomboi39 at gmail dot com. --[[User:151.196.181.220|151.196.181.220]] 18:00, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>151.196.181.220</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Anti-furries</id>
		<title>Talk:Anti-furries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Anti-furries"/>
				<updated>2006-01-13T14:52:20Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;151.196.181.220: /* See for yourself */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Corrected to account for [[Burned Fur]]'s non-status as an &amp;quot;anti-furry&amp;quot; group. They do not in fact meet any of the given criteria by which a group is in fact considered &amp;quot;anti-furry&amp;quot;.  In point of fact, Burned Furs constantly related serious concerns with the status of Furry Fandom's image, both in their individual correspondence and public statements.  There exists no evidence to date to suggest that Burned Fur wanted to ban pornography from the fandom or take any steps to harm the fandom itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Burned Furs did not have a problem with the fandom, but instead with the public sexual conduct of a small minority of furry fans who nonetheless managed to obtain the majority of media coverage concerning the fandom as a whole.  Many furry fans living alternative lifestyles interpreted the &amp;quot;Burned Fur Manifesto&amp;quot; to be an attack on their sexual preferences, and responded with accusations that the Burned Furs were everything from homophobes to neo-Nazis.  The end result amounted to several years of vicious and ultimately pointless flamewars mounted on the newsgroup alt.fan.furry by proponents of both sides. --[[User:Calbeck|Calbeck]], 16 Dec 2005&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reverted to the prior edit, as you are describing the initial intended idea of the formation of the group, not the quickly, disintegrating claustrof#@*! it finally ended being. And having being there during their time period, being friends with such members as MMM, almost incited by its initial goals, a frequent user of both their IRC channel plus message board, I can at-testify that, by the end of the experiment, they had, unfortunately, well earned their &amp;quot;anti-furry&amp;quot; wings. And no amount of rewrite will ever change that. Blame the people inside it that made this possible, they were in control of the wheel. As, now ironically, Michael “Gothtiger, MikeC” Campbell best put it: ''&amp;quot;What you connect yourself and your activities to can come back to haunt you&amp;quot;'' .[[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 05:58, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See for yourself ==&lt;br /&gt;
If you would ever take 5 minutes to actually read through CrushYiffDestroy, you dorks would learn that these people are indeed NOT anti-furry, as over 80% of the members ARE furries.  Harsh criticism and poking fun at the fandom does not equal hating it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So the mocking and insults aren't meant to hurt anyone? Disrespecting a person's deeply thought and honestly held beliefs is just good, clean fun? Violating someone's privacy is a kindness? Hating furries is what gets you put on the list. It doesn't matter what you ''are'', but only what you ''do''. -- [[User:Siege|Siege]] 14:10, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::So if I like Hostess brand fruit pies, but I make fun of all other brands of fruit pies for being of an inferior quality in my opinion, does that mean I hate ALL fruit pies regardless?  Also, news flash:  CYD gleans all of their &amp;quot;gossip&amp;quot; from publicly available websites and/or forums/communities.  Posting private information to the intarweb does not make it private anymore, does it?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>151.196.181.220</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Anti-furries</id>
		<title>Talk:Anti-furries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Anti-furries"/>
				<updated>2006-01-13T14:22:50Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;151.196.181.220: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Corrected to account for [[Burned Fur]]'s non-status as an &amp;quot;anti-furry&amp;quot; group. They do not in fact meet any of the given criteria by which a group is in fact considered &amp;quot;anti-furry&amp;quot;.  In point of fact, Burned Furs constantly related serious concerns with the status of Furry Fandom's image, both in their individual correspondence and public statements.  There exists no evidence to date to suggest that Burned Fur wanted to ban pornography from the fandom or take any steps to harm the fandom itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Burned Furs did not have a problem with the fandom, but instead with the public sexual conduct of a small minority of furry fans who nonetheless managed to obtain the majority of media coverage concerning the fandom as a whole.  Many furry fans living alternative lifestyles interpreted the &amp;quot;Burned Fur Manifesto&amp;quot; to be an attack on their sexual preferences, and responded with accusations that the Burned Furs were everything from homophobes to neo-Nazis.  The end result amounted to several years of vicious and ultimately pointless flamewars mounted on the newsgroup alt.fan.furry by proponents of both sides. --[[User:Calbeck|Calbeck]], 16 Dec 2005&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reverted to the prior edit, as you are describing the initial intended idea of the formation of the group, not the quickly, disintegrating claustrof#@*! it finally ended being. And having being there during their time period, being friends with such members as MMM, almost incited by its initial goals, a frequent user of both their IRC channel plus message board, I can at-testify that, by the end of the experiment, they had, unfortunately, well earned their &amp;quot;anti-furry&amp;quot; wings. And no amount of rewrite will ever change that. Blame the people inside it that made this possible, they were in control of the wheel. As, now ironically, Michael “Gothtiger, MikeC” Campbell best put it: ''&amp;quot;What you connect yourself and your activities to can come back to haunt you&amp;quot;'' .[[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 05:58, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See for yourself ==&lt;br /&gt;
If you would ever take 5 minutes to actually read through CrushYiffDestroy, you dorks would learn that these people are indeed NOT anti-furry, as over 80% of the members ARE furries.  Harsh criticism and poking fun at the fandom does not equal hating it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So the mocking and insults aren't meant to hurt anyone? Disrespecting a person's deeply thought and honestly held beliefs is just good, clean fun? Violating someone's privacy is a kindness? Hating furries is what gets you put on the list. It doesn't matter what you ''are'', but only what you ''do''. -- [[User:Siege|Siege]] 14:10, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::So if I like Hostess brand fruit pies, but I make fun of all other brands of fruit pies for being of an inferior quality in my opinion, does that mean I hate ALL fruit pies regardless?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>151.196.181.220</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Anti-furries</id>
		<title>Talk:Anti-furries</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Talk:Anti-furries"/>
				<updated>2006-01-13T13:37:24Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;151.196.181.220: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Corrected to account for [[Burned Fur]]'s non-status as an &amp;quot;anti-furry&amp;quot; group. They do not in fact meet any of the given criteria by which a group is in fact considered &amp;quot;anti-furry&amp;quot;.  In point of fact, Burned Furs constantly related serious concerns with the status of Furry Fandom's image, both in their individual correspondence and public statements.  There exists no evidence to date to suggest that Burned Fur wanted to ban pornography from the fandom or take any steps to harm the fandom itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Burned Furs did not have a problem with the fandom, but instead with the public sexual conduct of a small minority of furry fans who nonetheless managed to obtain the majority of media coverage concerning the fandom as a whole.  Many furry fans living alternative lifestyles interpreted the &amp;quot;Burned Fur Manifesto&amp;quot; to be an attack on their sexual preferences, and responded with accusations that the Burned Furs were everything from homophobes to neo-Nazis.  The end result amounted to several years of vicious and ultimately pointless flamewars mounted on the newsgroup alt.fan.furry by proponents of both sides. --[[User:Calbeck|Calbeck]], 16 Dec 2005&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reverted to the prior edit, as you are describing the initial intended idea of the formation of the group, not the quickly, disintegrating claustrof#@*! it finally ended being. And having being there during their time period, being friends with such members as MMM, almost incited by its initial goals, a frequent user of both their IRC channel plus message board, I can at-testify that, by the end of the experiment, they had, unfortunately, well earned their &amp;quot;anti-furry&amp;quot; wings. And no amount of rewrite will ever change that. Blame the people inside it that made this possible, they were in control of the wheel. As, now ironically, Michael “Gothtiger, MikeC” Campbell best put it: ''&amp;quot;What you connect yourself and your activities to can come back to haunt you&amp;quot;'' .[[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 05:58, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you would ever take 5 minutes to actually read through CrushYiffDestroy, you dorks would learn that these people are indeed NOT anti-furry, as over 80% of the members ARE furries.  Harsh criticism and poking fun at the fandom does not equal hating it.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>151.196.181.220</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>//en.wikifur.com/wiki/Kimberleigh_Ann_Keister</id>
		<title>Kimberleigh Ann Keister</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Kimberleigh_Ann_Keister"/>
				<updated>2006-01-13T13:27:02Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;151.196.181.220: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{NPOV}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Kimberleigh Ann Keister''' (also known as '''KAK''', '''Kimmah''', '''[http://www.geocities.com/keisterbeasterart/ KeisterBeaster]'' and '''Kimmaugh''', and '''KOOK''', '''HamBeast''', or the '''KAK-Beast''' by her detractors) is a former [[furry]] who is best known for her various antics in regard with [[furry fandom]], specially concerning anything [[Road Rovers]] related. She has become one of the many infamous personalities on the internet, providing hours of puzzlement, amusement, or disdain for furries, [[nonfur]]s, and [[anti-furries]] alike.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because of her outrageous behavior, it has been occasionally theorized that she is a hoax. Also in public doubt are her claims of being an [[animator]] with ties to the [[Walt Disney]] corporation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is said here about Kim Keister is a lie and slander to her good name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DO NOT SUBMIT WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM THE PERSON YOU ARE PROFILING! I KNOW NONEONE HAS THE RIGHTS TO SUBMIT LIES AND SLANDER ON THIS PERSON. THIS PERSON KIMBERLEIGH ANN KEISTER HAS EVERY RIGHTS TO FILE CHARGES ON WHO IS SLANDERING HER GOOD NAME. SLANDER LIKE THIS IS VERY ILLEGAL.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>151.196.181.220</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>