Template talk:EDitor

"Inflammatory infobox"? That's what users of Encyclopedia Dramatica refer to themselves as... Equivamptalk 08:32, 12 October 2011 (EDT)
 * Good, this is not ED, but Wikifur, EDiot is not a name we give an editor, from ED or not - Spirou 18:26, 12 October 2011 (EDT)
 * "ED critic", lolwut? The idea that everyone there is only there to criticize is inflammatory in itself. Also, what about "Let's not go down to their level. Skip the inflammatory jabs"? gg. Gheyneegirs 08:38, 12 October 2011 (EDT)
 * ...Lovely name,... "The idea that everyone there is only there to criticize is inflammatory in itself", good, less reason to do it here by marking them as an EDiot - Spirou 18:26, 12 October 2011 (EDT)
 * Not to mention the fact that "ED critic" just doesn't flow as well. Equivamptalk 08:54, 12 October 2011 (EDT)
 * Hmm, well, it's the message,... - Spirou 18:26, 12 October 2011 (EDT)
 * Put it this way: Users of WikiFur are known as WikiFurries. If a template were to be made of it, wouldn't it be better to say "WikiFurry", rather than "WikiFur furry"? Equivamptalk 08:32, 13 October 2011 (EDT)
 * Hmm, if you have a spelling idea/alternative that they won't use as am excuse (you called me an EDiot!), go for it (...Are info templates Curators only editable?,...) - Spirou 18:34, 13 October 2011 (EDT)

EDitor
Works, nice use of the initials. Fine with me, if other Curators have a point, they will put it forth - Spirou 19:56, 17 October 2011 (EDT)