User talk:87.211.0.84

Furocity
The reference that you keep removing is there to back up this specific assertion: "This is mainly because of the controversy surrounding the two subjects, both in the community and in law." Specifically, the statements that "The main issue is just that there's a lot of legal uncertainty regarding these two subjects, to the point where it's not worth dealing with," and that "It's been stressed to me that the beliefs of the site admin, Gavin, don't actually reflect what's in the policy-- he believes that not allowing these two fetishes is for the good of the site, regardless of whether he dislikes them or not." There is no reasoning available on Furocity itself for the decision to ban them, otherwise we would cite that instead. --GreenReaper(talk) 20:38, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Re: The reasoning for the owner banning the material from his site is not relevant, only that it is banned permanently. The link to the discussion being held by people whom have no actual say in the management of the TOS is irrelevant and only serves to create confusion amongst people who might possibly join. ESPECIALLY since it is in the Fur Affinity community, a site which does allow both these types of material and whose user base has actively pressured site owners to change their policies in their favor, there can be no doubt as to the submission policy if they want to join Furocity whilst Fur Affinity is down; Furocity is not a second FA and never will be. The TOS is not up for discussion.

That said, if you want an official statement from Gavin in regards to these rules, I could probably get one.

The event in question...
...has been discussed, but has not come to pass yet. It may not happen as the first two times - Spirou 17:42, 30 April 2012 (EDT)