User talk:IsaacBaranoff

You have written all the historical information over the years about the subject, even if you claim if it’s false. Unfortunately for you, the history section contradicts your assertion. In short, knock it off and stop lying about your own works. They are your own recorded facts. - Spirou (talk) 11:54, 19 June 2018 (EDT)

Horndog/Hey Wolf,... your own exquisite messes
Baranoff; You been the writer of both the comics listed here and its articles, way since it's first edit in 2009. You may sure that your words were the law and fought with everybody that disagreed, on and off the wiki. After all the years of headaches, you come back in 2017, declare null and void, and start the Horndog at zero again in 2017/2018, claiming falsehoods. Well, unfortunately, the "history" section plus the Internet Wayback Machine makes you look both like a fool and liar, I'm afraid you can't change history.

But why Baranoff would resurge from the bushes and try to destroy the established articles?. Well, it doesn't take a genius that is economics: After years languishing in Wiki hell, Horndog 2.0 (2018) is hitting the marketplace, and all mentions of Horndog 1.0 (2003 to 2014) must be erased for the sake of (embarrassment?, old material?, poor quality?, art "quality"?),...

But Wikifur is not a Magazine/Comic review site. You cant decide to host just the latest version of a comic. Wikifur is a historical living documentation site and all information will be displayed, especially if it's true (in your case, sorry not sorry, it is). Et voila, la paristes de ancho y largo, so you can't change verifiable data nor omit referenced info, so both comics stay the way they are. If you want a review of Horndog 2018 with a special appearance by Dogpool! (sic), try Wizard or the Comic's Journal, but don't try to manipulate Wikifur for monetary/fame generation.

Article edit reversals, if it contradicts the history page or the references provided, mostly by wayback, will be reverted. Sanitizing Horndog 1.0 from the article will be reverted. Any other bad editorial behavior, it will be reverted. It's been 9 years of this behavior, editors and curators don't have to put up with 9 years more. Hope this is clear, Baranoff. - Spirou (talk) 18:19, 19 June 2018 (EDT)

No, I didn't write my own articles
Cut this shit out. You're the only fool here. You're lying about me and you keep putting up statements written by Internet trolls. You're out of line. Matter of fact, why don't you delete all these fake articles, because it makes you look even more stupid when you try to tell the people who created this work what their own work is? Face it, YOU ARE WRONG. 99% of what is written about me here is wrong. And NO ONE should have to put up with your abusive treatment. Either get it right or take everything down. Because this unencyclopedic shit makes everyone involved look bad, most of all *you*, for parroting Internet trolls and promoting lies.

IsaacBaranoff (talk) 04:16, 20 June 2018 (EDT)


 * I have gotten NO TRAFFIC to my site from yours. I have made NO MONEY from having your site misrepresent and lie about me through anonymous Internet trolls hiding behind their computer screens. Either delete every one of these fake, made up articles or keep the info correct. Do NOT impugn my integrity by actively insulting and berating me. You will NOT intimidate me like this. IsaacBaranoff (talk) 04:31, 20 June 2018 (EDT)


 * I don't WANT your site to cover my work. You can either delete every article on my work or cover it accurately, NOT based on the drug addled ramblings of anonymous Internet trolls. I will NOT put up with this. IsaacBaranoff (talk) 04:34, 20 June 2018 (EDT)