Category talk:Sexual multiplayer worlds

Keeping in line with the other category names, I'd like to propose renaming this category to "Mature multiplayer worlds". Thoughts? --Dmuth 04:54, 20 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I think "mature" is really ambiguous. Multiplayer worlds, in particular, may revolve around mature themes such as violence, while disallowing sexual content. -- Sine 05:10, 20 March 2006 (UTC)


 * "Mature" does indeed have other connotations that can be ambiguous. "Adult" might be an alternative, or at the very least "Sexually-Oriented"; "Sexual" by itself makes it sounds like the multiplayer worlds themselves are screwing (which would, I suppose, lend credence to the phrase, "The world is fucked"). --Duncan da Husky 13:17, 20 March 2006 (UTC)


 * This is where I giggle at the vision of multiplayer worlds in lustful embrace. Good point. Sexually-orientated (I think that would be it, going by the lowercase except sometimes rule thing) looks clear to me. Or maybe sexually-themed? -- Sine 19:15, 20 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm not so sure this categorization is as appropriate as it might be for (say) comics, because it's very hard to draw the line. How many multiplayer worlds don't have mature content somewhere? When you get player interaction between adults (or heck, between teens) you are very likely to get things like sex and violence. It is however true that some worlds are particularly oriented towards this sort of thing - Tapestries springs to mind. -- 19:29, 20 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Endless Round MUCK has a strict no-TS policy - so there are MUCKs that don't allow explicitly sexual situations. Spaz Kitty


 * Then why don't we combine all of the suggestions thus far? How about if we have a category called Mature multiplayer worlds, with a subcategory of that called Sexual multiplayer worlds to hold MUCKs that are specifically about sex.  Would that meet everyone's requirements?  --Dmuth 20:39, 20 March 2006 (UTC)


 * A Mature multiplayer worlds category doesn't strike me as useful, as it's so general and doesn't tell you anything about the theme. A sub-category for multiplayer worlds which disallow explicit content might be of more use (and significantly smaller) but I'd tend to say just toss that in as a list in a relevant article such as the one for TinySex. -- Sine 21:38, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Let us revive this discussion. My vote is for Sexually-themed multiplayer worlds as a subcategory of Multiplayer worlds. -- Sine 20:09, 11 April 2006 (UTC)


 * That suits me just fine.DuncanDaHusky(talk) 23:37, 11 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Gets my vote. -- Siege 06:07, 12 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Alright. I'm going to change this category to Sexually-themed multiplayer worlds in a couple of days or so, unless there are any objections. -- Sine 23:44, 13 April 2006 (UTC)