Talk:Dolphin Paradise

Is a zoophilia focused website appropriate for this wiki?
There is technically furry content there and the owner is a furry, so I suppose it belongs here from that standpoint, but I don't know if having a page linking to a zoophilia website is a great image for the furry wiki, especially considering that most furries would rather distance themselves from zoophiles. --2001:5B0:251E:D658:C4A2:9D4A:62C3:BF69 16:38, 10 November 2020 (EST)
 * Zoophilia is not a furry concept but a mainstream paraphilia one, but furries can be zoophiles, but then again, taking carnal advantage of real animals has never, ever been a popular furry perception since the creation of the fandom, and a quick perusal of, say Twitter, it is still a heavily reinforced anti-zoophilia conviction.
 * Can zoophilia data be present or displayed on Wikifur?: It has and still is, but so far is more in a discussion manner and a least a few use article identifiers. As it stands right now, as I the Curator responding to this single query, zoophilia-friendly pages are a "no-no" on the wiki,. As per external links?... I have never been presented with that option, so further discussion is probably warranted.
 * (This is a quick response that I could expand on, so take it with a grain of salt). - Spirou (talk) 21:26, 10 November 2020 (EST)
 * If "zoophilia-friendly" pages aren't allowed, then I would say this might count as that, since the page was created and mostly edited by the owner of the site. The article is written in a mostly neutral tone, though.
 * If external links are to be regulated somehow, I think there should at least be sufficient description of the site's content on the articles. Until I edited the page recently, there was little mention of zoophilia on the article page, which could have misled anyone not reading it closely. --2001:5B0:2559:E988:78:E42E:CC2F:9679 14:17, 11 November 2020 (EST)
 * A warning of what it linked to would have been nice, thank God I wasn't checking it from my work computer. No, not furry methinks at all, and all that displayed media is not neutral under any circumstances, it shows what it sells from the main page onward. - Spirou (talk) 23:40, 11 November 2020 (EST)
 * The site does contain a gallery of furry art (nsfw), but it doesn't appear that what's there was uploaded with knowledge or permission of the artists. --Equivamp - talk 00:00, 12 November 2020 (EST)