User talk:174.3.212.2

Herpy.net
Your suggestion of "wrongdoing" by the whole staff was reverted. The statement, plus the (nothing to do with what supposedly transpired) deletion of the site from an disambiguation page indicates a POV bias, and, no, you must present the "proof" (references) on the article itself, not to ask you offsite for it. And by the insinuation, please make a compelling case for it's inclusion on this article. "Because i said so", "I witness it", "somebody told me", "I found a screenshot", etc,... won't cut it. Hope this helps - Spirou 18:04, 2 October 2013 (EDT)