User talk:KaliPaige

Equivamptalk 08:45, 12 August 2011 (EDT)

Censoring and sanitizing
Stop. One thing is to edit an entry to maintain the neutrality of Wikifur. Sanitizing or wishing an article to be omitted is NOT the purpose of this Wiki, no matter how "damaging" it can be,... There's dark and evil in the furry lore, and we must accept this as a part of the fandom. Burying furry's bad image is not part of an historical Wiki - Spirou 01:35, 14 August 2011 (EDT)

Disagreement.
I understand the principles of neutrality. But to completely destroy a better layout? You ruined my concepts for Nazi Furs and didn't even look at what I did with it, adding in examples and actually giving more justification. --KaliPaige 01:49, 14 August 2011 (EDT)


 * And another thing. Sex, however much you desire to justify it, is not worth the history books. When you open your history book in school, do you get an in-depth page about human sexuality? About why people have sex? This is a Wiki devoted to the history of anthropomorphic animals, NOT what they do in bed or their fetishes. I merely added in more on the yiff page and reworded - NOT deleted entirely. I am not erasing anything; I do not have that power. I know my boundaries. For example, had you even taken a look at what I did for the Nazifur page, I left it the same. The SAME, and added citations, quotations, references; things any good Wiki page should have. --KaliPaige 02:10, 14 August 2011 (EDT)


 * And another thing. Sex, however much you desire to justify it, is not worth the history books.,... Have read the bible, as in, sex and the bible? =) When you open your history book in school, do you get an in-depth page about human sexuality? No in depth, but mentioned it, yes: Oedipus?, sex and incest =O


 * Yiff equal sex?,... Welcome to life. Welcome to Yiff. Many of the set corner stones of the fandom, a firmly set stone, even if it's sexual and involving furry personas/characters - Spirou 19:58, 14 August 2011 (EDT)