User talk:71.116.187.47

In regard to your edit on Jamie Malecki. We'd rather not have that claim without documentation. If you have a verifiable source that says something specific, then you can add it back. --Rat 06:07, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


 * No, really. We asked for documentation before making such claims and we meant it.  Any future attempts to add that same claim without documentation will result in them being reverted.  However, if you have documentation, feel free to post it.  Thanks.  --Douglas Muth 00:29, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Jalecki
http://www.badlydrawnkitties.com/jalecki.html

That's the most recent. Sorry, don't quite know if I'm doing this correctly.


 * Wow. Yeah, I think linking to that page from his article would be sufficient.
 * No need to worry about formatting, any of the "regulars" here will be happy to help out! :-) --Douglas Muth 00:47, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Jalecki
Okay, edited. Hope that's better. Thanks for all your patience and I apologize for any inconvience I may have caused earlier.
 * No problem. Thanks for working with us to better the wiki. -- DeVandalizer 01:10, 5 July 2006 (UTC)