Talk:Toast the Rabbit

Well, that is an opinion, certainly. :-) At what point does it become a "valid" controversy? Are we excluding personal posts, or journals dedicated to "spreading drama" (marked as such or otherwise)? --GreenReaper(talk) 19:58, 19 July 2015 (EDT)

Protection
I removed protection because I had the impression that it was being used to impose personal editorial views (especially since no debate had occurred here on the suitability of these sources). I know we don't have as many editors as Wikipedia, but it's still possible to invite one to give a third opinion. An uninvolved curator should consider imposing protection, if necessary, and determine the appropriate time period. Indefinite protection to colleagues suggests that an article can never be editable by anyone but trusted editors - hard to imagine beyond exclusion and "system" pages/templates. --GreenReaper(talk) 19:58, 19 July 2015 (EDT)