User talk:37.187.147.158

Controversies (how and when)
An personal opinion on Polyamorous relationships is not a "Controversy". Now, if he would, for example, tell/entice/bully a polyamorous transgender furry individual to commit suicide because of his/her/their sexual orientation/gender, in a personal capacity (convention staff) or in a furry venue (furry social media site, gallery, furry web radio/video, etc), that would be one hell of a controversy. - Spirou (talk) 19:06, 19 July 2015 (EDT)
 * Revert, the precedence has been set on greenreaper's page. if "xxx-phobic comments" are good enough to note on greenreaper's page it's good enough for here. also added AB post -
 * "It's is good enough"; how about no. People felt that Greenreaper's personal opinions on the subject, while on the position of lead curator of a furry wiki, were tantamount to "improper conduct" of somebody related or connected high enough to the furry fandom/community, thus, controversial. "That's is good enough" is an opinion, not a valid reason.- Spirou (talk) 19:25, 19 July 2015 (EDT)
 * that's a bullshit argument spirou, and you know it. Greenreaper's comments were made only as a statement of his personal beliefs and his being a wiki curator was completely incidental. He never posted his thoughts about transgenderism on wikifur, neither did he try to use his "status" as a curator to lend weight to his words. If you feel he did, why not say Toast's statements were "improper conduct" because he is the manager of a big-name entertainer in the fandom?
 * Also if rainhopper/toast's Artists Beware writeup isn't "important" enough for you, I assume you will hurrying yourself to remove similar sections from the articles on AuraSoul, Dr. West, LeeLee, Falvie, MangoBell, SilverCherry, and so on -- wouldn't want it to look like wikifur is arbitrary, would we? -
 * "that's a bullshit argument spirou, and you know it.'". No, it's not, but, it's you own own opinion that you are entitled to express, really.


 * But truly, I shouldn't have touched this subject with a ten foot pole, i will revert my first edition to the controversy section (Vivisector is fine, but the other refs sites read really biased), and will let other editors and/or curators manage that section and original information.


 * "Also if rainhopper/toast's Artists Beware writeup isn't " important " enough for you'"... That section was corrected before you replied to this discussion, just FYI. - Spirou (talk) 20:20, 19 July 2015 (EDT)