Talk:Rattuskid

I don't think the car photographs are a worthwhile addition to WikiFur. They are not of the person in question, and are small, low-quality images. Perhaps a link to somewhere else the photographs are available online? -- Sine 07:11, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The pictures don't have license information either. --Rat 07:38, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

I changed a whole bunch of url links out for wiki links, rephrased a few bits, and took out some information that didn't seem to belong. This was mainly information about the purpose of each individual LiveJournal group, as such information would probably go better on the groups' own WikiFur pages. Didn't touch the photos as I'd rather see someone with more seniority say something about it, though I can agree with Sine that there seems to be little point to them. Maybe one photo of the leopard interior would be interesting if it was taken under better lighting conditions? --quoting_mungo 07:44, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

I don't really mind that I have an article on wikifur. It just seems that the original author tried to make it as EDish, and frankly is unfunny. The information is all unceremoniously copypasted from my livejournal, basically rearranged according to groups and recent public entries. The car is the same model as mine (as though it matters, seeing as nobody else has stuff about economy cars in their articles) but those are not images of it. Read MOAR. Namely, also this image...

Was from a (now debunk) clipart gallery, so I don't think it was held in any copyrights in the first place, and it's certainly not copywritten to myself or any artist I comissioned. I may clean the whole article up later with some relevant information concerning my small involvement in the fandom, if not, it would need cleaning anyway. Toodles. -- Rattuskid

rolled back 68.37.180.226 edits
Just noticed the edits of 68.37.180.226. My main objection to the first edit was the nasty comment that was unreferenced. In my opinion, 68.37.180.226's second edit MIGHT belong in a forum thread, but not in a wikifur article. --EarthFurst 09:07, 1 January 2007 (UTC)