Talk:Ursula Husted

"Funny animal" fandom? If "furry" is unacceptable (I can see why, but surely being on this site in the first place is enough of an association), I think that just "fandom" would be better. The funny animal fandom still may have an independent existence, but we, the users of this site, are no longer _exclusively_ fans of funny animals, for better or worse. Tevildo 19:16, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)


 * There actually are a few places that link to funny animal fandom already, even through there's no article written for it yet. To be honest, I'm not sure we should worry too much about explaining the subtly different connotations between furry and funny animals, at least not until the furry fandom article says something more helpful than "people don't universally agree about this".  -- 19:32, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)


 * Very true. :) My point, however, is that "funny animal" _is_ a well-defined concept, and Ursula's admirers - myself included - don't all consider ourselves to be fans of that particular subset of the genre.  Shall we stick to simply "fandom" for the moment? Tevildo 19:36, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)


 * I'd be inclined to defer to her choice of wording (I'm assuming 70.92.163.98 is her, of course), particularly in the case of self-representation. Frequently "funny animal fandom" gets used to mean roughly "furry for the art, minus the bohemian subcultural baggage", and that'd be entirely appropriate here.  Just my opinion, of course.  -- 19:48, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Request for exclusion
The subject of this article has requested exclusion from WikiFur. I intend to perform this exclusion within 24 hours, unless this situation changes, or anyone can give a particularly good reason not to. --GreenReaper(talk) 22:09, 12 February 2007 (UTC)