User talk:Connor Goodwolf

Welcome to my talk page. Feel free to ask questions here or send me a message. Connor Goodwolf (talk)

John Remmer
See Talk:John Remmer for some details that should be archived on his k9sentry.com article.--Furry Underbelly (talk) 04:39, 21 October 2019 (EDT)

Zodithreepaw
Your map lists Zodithreepaw. Can you add him to wikifur if you have proof he is I.B.?--Furry Underbelly (talk) 08:26, 4 May 2020 (EDT)

Kannos
No, we are nor a "people search" website, neither we offer "help" with lawsuits by divulging personal data. Like the last time RL info was introduced to an article without judged criminal reason, this is just, again, plain doxxing.

This person is just a scammer. Being a jerk and thief, as it seems that's all she is, does not warrant the use of Wikifur's resources for a personal cause (dox everyfur/non-fur that have crossed a perceived "criminal line", no matter it seems how petty in your crime scale).

...And overlooking the edit note present on the article about not adding her real name, well, that's not good editorial behavior. - Spirou (talk) 19:53, 24 June 2020 (EDT)

Doxxing (continuing)
Didn't bring up your doxxing of AxxiosGrey because I thought the obvious removal of his name with my edit would indicate that was not the proper thing to do. But here we are with Storm-Tiger and his rl name added to his article with no judged criminal charges or apparent current or future harm to any users in the fandom...

Didn't see any of your improvement to the article (furry cons or extra external links) but your quick addition (do) of his real handle was duly noted. How about this: Stop it?, clear?. Hope so. - Spirou (talk) 02:01, 21 November 2020 (EST)


 * If he didn't want his real name out there, then he shouldn't have registered the apps under his real name or the business licenses. Connor Goodwolf (talk) 02:04, 21 November 2020 (EST)


 * Spiro, you seem to be under the assumption of a "left vs right" issue wrt AxxiosGrey, which is not the case. The "boog boy" movement is about a movement at the ready to start shooting people due to their views of government overreach. You assumed incorrectly and should be apologizing. I've taken other actions since the fellow in question is a clear an present danger. You overstepped on a domestic terrorism edit believing the issue was political, shame on you. Connor Goodwolf (talk) 02:12, 21 November 2020 (EST)


 * Oh for Pete's sake, dial down the dramatics, Conno. I read the thread involved, and no, he is not a present and clear furry danger to the fandom, mainstream or the US Government in the CONUS. - Spirou (talk) 02:36, 21 November 2020 (EST)
 * I now understand you're lacking information in order to obtain a clear and neutral view, as I'm not talking about the Twitter thread. Do some research in to various militia groups, there have been furries caught up in fringe groups which have been taken down like Hutaree. The "Boog Boy" movement and people affiliated are the types who will end up killing people even only certain individuals in the groups are the individuals engaging in domestic terrorism. If you want to discuss this further in private then ping me on IRC. Connor Goodwolf (talk) 02:40, 21 November 2020 (EST)


 * (*Sigh*) Connor, you are not the only person with information about Boog Boys (the Boogaloo movement), the Proud Boys, and any other wankers and nutters in this world, and you no bloody frackin' idea of what I do or do not about anything, so don't even try to impose what you think I am aware off or not. The subject at hand was doxxing, and, again, minus future developments, stop it. - Spirou (talk) 02:54, 21 November 2020 (EST)
 * There is no "doxxing", correct spelling doxing, again you need to take a step back. Based on your comments in the summary in the edits, your objectivity is clouded. Connor Goodwolf (talk) 02:56, 21 November 2020 (EST)


 * "There is no "doxxing", correct spelling doxing" (...) Well, do please vamoose to the Wikipedia entry about the term, it seems to be edited wrong, old chap. "Your objectivity is clouded", Hmm nope, it just quite fine too, Connor. - Spirou (talk) 03:09, 21 November 2020 (EST)
 * I'll defer to GreenReaper as I've told him I'm not interested in having a conversation with someone who has clouded objectivity and isn't well informed on issues of domestic terrorism. Connor Goodwolf (talk) 03:11, 21 November 2020 (EST)


 * Well, good nite. Just do be careful who you dox in the future. - Spirou (talk) 03:21, 21 November 2020 (EST)


 * Adding real-life names, dates of birth and locations (to the level of a town) is generally accepted by editors. However, the removal of such information at the request of the subject in the name of privacy is also generally accepted, unless there is consensus that retaining such information is in the public interest - which typically is only the case when crimes have been committed by the subject.
 * In fact, there was a recent attempt to remove the article entirely. This was from an anonymous user, but it did claim to be the subject, and it is from the same ISP as another anonymous editor who claimed to be the subject. I see that a curator reverted it and posted a note on talk regarding personal exclusion, but such notes on talk pages are often missed, as IP addresses can change rapidly. Now the same curator wishes to remove such information themselves - a goal which could be achieved in line with precedent by performing the personal exclusion.
 * To me, the logical course of action would be for the curator in question to reach out directly to the subject to confirm the apparent request, rather than wait to be contacted - not via the email address provided in the summary, as it's unclear whether this is truly linked to the subject (though it would be possible to elicit confirmation via a more verified method of contact through it), but via one of the accounts listed on the article, which are accepted as being owned by the subject. --GreenReaper(talk) 09:14, 21 November 2020 (EST)
 * If an individual runs a well known business such as a dating site then the question becomes is there public interest? Executives of companies are generally known, posted on company websites, there's also the legal liability if someone needs to file a lawsuit against said company and business license aspect. Connor Goodwolf (talk) 09:24, 21 November 2020 (EST)

Re: GreenReaper: Fired a Twitter DM to the user in questions to query if he wishes Personal Exclusion or just removal of personal data. - Spirou (talk) 16:02, 21 November 2020 (EST)
 * Why would an exclusion request be granted for AxxiosGrey, other than attempt to cover up a possible domestic terrorist? Connor Goodwolf (talk) 16:06, 21 November 2020 (EST)
 * What you're trying to do is very sketchy, just like how PAFOA, a Pennsylvania firearms forum, attempted to cover their tracks after Richard Poplawski killed 3 police officers in Pittsburgh. Thankfully people grabbed messages, photos, etc before the admins deleted everything from the site, which the guy was very much like AxxiosGrey including joining white supremacist forums. Connor Goodwolf (talk) 16:08, 21 November 2020 (EST)
 * Let me be crystal clear here, Connor: just because you think someone is a bad person - or associates with bad people - does not mean they have committed a crime, nor that they are excluded from equal treatment by us with respect to our privacy policies. The question is not whether the name is known, or publicly available - and indeed, if it is publicly available as part of a business registration, it's likely to remain so. It is whether we grant a request not to publish it on our site, in an article about that person's furry activities. When the subject of an article has been charged or convicted of killing someone, you're welcome to bring that up. Otherwise you're just throwing out names we don't know or care about in an attempt to bolster your argument. If you want to maintain and publish a database of people you don't like and don't think should be in furry fandom, you're welcome to do that yourself. --GreenReaper(talk) 16:31, 21 November 2020 (EST)
 * Let me be crystal clear, wrt dangerous individuals who pose a legitimate risk like AxxiosGrey, there's a real risk of him engaged in a militia similar to a specific furry who was cut loose from the bust on the Hutaree. Since the guy advocates civil war and is prominently furry he should be fully documented on WikiFur so others can also be made aware and report any important information to law enforcement. There's quite a bit information you don't know, and I'll be more than happy to educate you on the topic. Protecting life is important, it's good to be proactive. Connor Goodwolf (talk) 16:37, 21 November 2020 (EST)