Talk:Feasox

While clearly someone put a lot of effort into this, it doesn't strike me as a useful article. Perhaps it should be moved to user space. -- Sine 19:37, 21 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I would very much tend to agree. It certainly should be deleted from the main namespace. DuncanDaHusky(talk) 11:45, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Didn't this get moved to use space some while back? It doesn't strike me as an appropriate article. -- Sine 06:46, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Agree. If it stays, it needs to be very much cleaned up and trimmed down. Spaz Kitty 06:49, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Status update (June 29th 2007)
Updating the entry's appropriateness status. Keep on the "appropriate" queue?, Merge?, Delete? Spirou 17:15, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I vote for a move to user space, cutting down to bare basics (the politics sections and stuff are unneccessary), or deleting altogether if this species isn't popular enough (like Folfs are, for example) to warrant having its own article. Spaz Kitty 16:15, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree with SpazKitty's comments. I'm at a loss as to why it was moved out of userspace to begin with.DuncanDaHusky(talk) 16:50, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, it's still there, and now it's the main article again. --GreenReaper(talk) 18:48, 30 June 2007 (UTC)