User talk:Ô

Equivamptalk 15:43, 17 July 2011 (EDT)

Re: Hi
I wasn't "edit waring[sic]". I was restoring removed information to an article. Also note the information it was replaced with has been discussed in further detail in another section. Also, the administrator that protected the page was just as much correcting you as anyone. How about you get off my back and edit more before you start correcting regular contributors, hm? Equivamptalk 18:32, 17 July 2011 (EDT)

Honestly I feel you are in no position to determine who "belongs here". ED sysops edit here--I'm just a barely tolerated grammar Nazi on that site, and I was here before I ever went there. Would you like to remain on my back some more, or are we going to go on our merry ways? Equivamptalk 18:41, 17 July 2011 (EDT)

Actually, no. Even an ED sysop has made valued contributions to this wiki. But, if you're calling out my integrity, fine--look through my contributions and tell me once where I have attacked this site. I don't know where you get your infornation from, but it's a load of crap. I guess I should expect that from someone from fchan. Equivamptalk 18:53, 17 July 2011 (EDT)

No personal attacks
That includes vandals. Let's not tell people to "fuck off". Equivamptalk 03:25, 26 July 2011 (EDT)
 * Isn't it ironic that you are telling me this, when you are guilty of it? &lt;o&gt; 03:33, 26 July 2011 (EDT)
 * I was guilty of it in the past, yes, but never toward you. Or are you admitting you're a vandal? Equivamptalk 03:34, 26 July 2011 (EDT)
 * Of course not! Have I ever vandalized? Also, you admit to it now? &lt;o&gt; 03:38, 26 July 2011 (EDT)
 * Vandalism includes disruptive edits. e.g., just about everything in your contributions. And, as I said, I have made a personal attack against someone else, which is unrelated to this discussion. Equivamptalk 03:40, 26 July 2011 (EDT)
 * Well in that case, I suppose you are a vandal too? &lt;o&gt; 03:43, 26 July 2011 (EDT)

HAHAHA, no. Equivamptalk 03:46, 26 July 2011 (EDT)

Please refrain from name-calling and personal attacks, as you did in this edit. Failure to comply may result in your being blocked. Thank you. --mwalimu 23:02, 26 July 2011 (EDT)

Hello
There is a discussion that needs your attention at Talk:Encyclopædia Dramatica (.ch) &lt;o&gt; 03:58, 26 July 2011 (EDT)
 * I skimmed over it a few minutes ago, but it didn't seem like any consensus had been formed as to do anything that would require a curator. The editing community as a whole makes the decision here, we just facilitate them, so you'll need to try to work things out with the regular editors of that article rather than appealing to authority. --GreenReaper(talk) 04:02, 26 July 2011 (EDT)

Hint
Blanking sections of an article while a discussion about whether it should be kept is taking place=big no-no. Equivamptalk 23:12, 26 July 2011 (EDT)