Talk:Smokin' Aces

Furry relevant?
As it stands right know, unless it can be expanded upon, it seems to be a very weak reason for inclusion. On personal viewing of film, the first thought was "costume attire from Las Vegas' Circus Circus hotel, not precisely "somebody's fursuit used for sex,"... The Drew Carey Show suit episode did indeed allude to the notion, even if it didn't mention furry. Thoughts? Spirou 15:46, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I think you have to include the entire scene for itself and what it is... the lawyer is obviously an archtype of a lonely pervert who has weird fetishes and as to show how weird they are he has a fursuit. While the head is primarly shown you can see the other fursuit parts during the scene and a portion of the fursuit in that screenshot by itself. -[[Image:Skunklogo.gif]] (U)(T)(C) 15:37, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, The Shining has an article. Greenreaper added it. So :P -[[Image:Skunklogo.gif]] (U)(T)(C) 15:52, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Status update (July 23rd 2008)
Updating the entry's appropriateness status. Keep?, Delete? Spirou 06:18, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I haven't seen it. I think it sounds like one of those little things that most people don't get, but furries do. Keep --Rat 09:51, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Article update #2 (April 17 2009)
Updating the entry's appropriateness status. Keep or delete?. Vote on Delete (2 for, 1 against) - Spirou 03:13, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Just because a film has a scene with an animal costume in it doesn't make it worthy of a wikifur article. Vote Delete. ~ Taren 13:32, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Article update #3 (December 20, 2009)
Updating the entry's appropriateness status. Keep or delete?. Spirou delete, Taren delete, Rat keep - Spirou 22:41, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Article final decision (March 6 2009)
Three's requests on the appropriateness status: Final result: Spirou delete, Taren delete, Rat keep - Spirou 00:22, 7 March 2010 (UTC)