Talk:Demitri

I believe that artists are of interest to furry fandom, and thus this site. The article certainly needs expansion, but I don't see any criteria for speedy deletion. --WhiteFire(talk) 09:31, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


 * If anything I would say that this would fall under the criteria that WikiFur is not a links repository. Without any further expansion, that's really all this article and Singe are - pretty much just links and nothing else.DuncanDaHusky(talk) 13:02, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Then why don't we expand the article so it's more than a list of links? :-) --Douglas Muth 19:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Leaving the Singe article there an extra few hours seems to have already gotten it expanded by two people. I'd think that the lack of information would be a reason for the Category:Person stubs tag which was already in both articles. I was basing this decision on Speedy deletion which under lack of content states Limited content is not in itself a reason to delete if there is enough context to allow expansion. I felt the links gave it enough to do that. If you disagree you are an admin and of course can just delete the article. --WhiteFire(talk) 22:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Actually, I was not familiar with that passage in the Speedy Delete description - it's clear that in this case the Speedy Delete was misapplied. Really, my intention was was more to answer your (perhaps rhetorical) question of what possible criteria could be applied. In this case, I'd say you're definitely in the right, though. I should also emphasize that even though I'm an administrator that doesn't give me any more or less right to have a say in the editing of articles on WikiFur. It just means that I have a few more tools at my disposal for wiki maintenance and vandalism management :-) DuncanDaHusky(talk) 23:19, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't think my original post was phrased as a question. It wasn't meant to be anyway. I intended it as an explanation for why I reverted the edit that inserted a speedy deletion tag into the article. I believe that any time I revert someone's edits I owe an explanation as to why on the talk page. --WhiteFire(talk) 02:22, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Now, granted, after digging through their VCL site that was all I was able to expand the article. I was not even able to find anything searching the net under either their name, email address listed on VCL, or their somewhat distinctive signature RGD3 --WhiteFire(talk) 02:35, 9 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, perhaps they'll read this some day and decide to fill it out a little more. And if not, it's a minor footnote in furry history that has done no real harm. :-) --GreenReaper(talk) 02:39, 9 May 2007 (UTC)