WikiFur:Featured article candidates/ArtPlz

ArtPlz
I nominate this article that I rewrote because I believe its a pretty good size example, plus has a picture and good selection of links. ^_^; --Nidonocu - talk 11:48, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * I'd have to oppose this, because I don't think a frequently-changing article that's been accused of so much NPOV and inaccuracy deserves to be featured as the best WikiFur can be. nn;  Almafeta 11:59, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * Um.. why should the frequency of changes dicate if an article should be featured? An article that has changed alot indicates that it has been worked on by many people to get to the point at which it is now. I personally also stand by my text in that it is NPOV, its accused yes, but none of those accusations have been backed up with evidence that disputes what I've written. --Nidonocu - talk [[Image:Trans 168.png|16px|Nidonocu]] 12:15, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * A bit too short. Also low on references for a contentious topic. --Rat 01:47, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Oppose. It is not so much the article that gains my opposition but rather the subject that the article discuss. ArtPlz gallery no longer works, nor its administrator's LiveJournal been live since April 2006. Harshly put, the subject matter is dead, and -like anything on the Net- gone without a trace. Unless ArtPlz has captained the Furry fandom in the past, this article should not be a candidate for a feature article status. And looking at the data the recommendation was made, Sep 2005, should its candidancy remain live. 3 year has passed. It isn't going anywhere. --Perneseblue 10:53, 28 February 2008 (UTC)