Talk:T.C.A.A.

Sorry if this article violates some unknown terms...:P....I play on lots of their game servers and thought they deserved an article here seeing that they r bigger than the famous cc2iscool community and that their leader is a furry

Btw what terms does this seem to violate?? 72.36.145.138 04:44, 16 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Non-common furry/mainstream term. Because some users on a non-furry mainstream site have a some minor beefs with furry is not enough/doesn't qualify as a Wikifur article.


 * If the involvement of such mainstream site was as involved/known as 4chan, its inclusion on this Wiki would be of consideration, thus the non-appropriate tag because, at the present time, it's not - Spirou 21:37, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Wasnt it was approved for some time under some admin who justified that because the owner was a furry that the article would be appropriate?


 * The way I see this is that Cc2iscooL has an article. Whereas this is bigger than Cc2iscooL.  Its just that this gaming community wasnt intended for furries?  I dont know man I am a furry and I play on a lot of his servers.

Article update #1 (April 17 2009)
Updating the entry's appropriateness status. Keep or delete? - Spirou 03:23, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't like how the article is right now, seems to be focused on complaining. But Keep --Rat 04:44, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Article update #2 (December 20, 2009)
Updating the entry's appropriateness status. Keep or delete?. Rat Keep - Spirou 22:50, 20 December 2009 (UTC)


 * This material is not furry related. Just because a small CS 1.6 gaming organization was run by a former furry, it does not mean it is significantly furry related.  This gaming organization doesnt even exist anymore, and the owner is no longer a furry. This article should be deleted for being not relevant to furry fandom.


 * Yeah, I'd say delete because I'm not sure how this is that different from the roleplaying group that had a couple of furries in. --GreenReaper(talk) 06:04, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Final
3 against it, one for keeping. Deleting article - Spirou 02:19, 4 May 2011 (EDT)