User talk:K.M. Hirosaki

Welcome to WikiFur! Hope you have fun editing here - if you need any help, let me know on my user talk page. :-) -- 04:44, 15 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Blue Forest enties
Hi! I just wanted to thank you for putting work into helping out with entries related to Blue Forest. I was plesantly surprised to see these here! I'm in the process of adding and expanding on some of them, now, and I certainly welcome any tweaking that you think needs to be done. -K.M. Hirosaki 04:47, 15 Aug 2005 (UTC)


 * You're welcome! You obviously have a few loyal fans who cared enough to start them. I'll be watching, but your pages seem pretty good so far. :-) -- 04:56, 15 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Blue Forest template?
There seem to be a lot of articles related to the Blue Forest series on the wiki currently, and Osfer suggested I mention adding a template to tie all the various articles together. You'd have to keep it up to date and add it to the various articles that should have it, as I cannot be trusted to remember them all. --Xax 17:40, 15 Aug 2005 (UTC)


 * Addendum: There's now a template at Template:Blue forest that you should mess around with until you like how it looks. Try to keep it fairly short. --Xax 17:51, 15 Aug 2005 (UTC)


 * Thanks! I'll see what I can come up with! -- K.M. Hirosaki 18:39, 15 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Fox edits
I recently added the following comment to Fox discussion:
 * K.M. Hirosaki recently made several updates to the article, most of which were good, but I question the removal of the following statements:
 * Under fennec: "They have a lot of cuteness that make them irresistable to many furry fans."
 * Under kit fox: "They too have a "cuteness" factor to them, though not as much as the fennec."
 * Under grey fox: "Some furries choose the grey fox over the red fox because they find the colouration attractive, or because it is a comfortable alternative to the red fox's ubiquitous form."
 * I think he removed them as not fitting with the more scientific tone of the rest of the article, which I can kind of see. However, in my opinion, discussion of why particular species of fox appeal to furry fans is relevant and should be allowed to remain in the article.  If they seem out of place where they were originally, we could create a different section of the article.  Thoughts?

--mwalimu 18:11, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)