Talk:Serengeti Nights

In the animal category list, should male and female be listed seperately as it is? Surely you can blend a list of lions and lionesses.--Kendricks Redtail 08:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't care for the extensively long list of character species, anyway. I don't like character lists in general (as they're often incomplete), but in this case, I especially think the huge TOC it creates as a result is unnecessary. I vote for a reversion to the original list style. Spaz Kitty 17:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I want to know where this giant list of characters came from. It must be some external source, whether it's a list sitting online somewhere, or out of someone's logs of activity on Serengeti Nights. I feel we should point to whatever that source is, rather than duplicate it here. The archived copy of Serengeti Night's website does have some Character Profiles. That could be reference for some of the names, and be a suitable external link. -- Sine 21:29, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I see the contributor in question has also created articles about three of the characters from the muck, and I'm having flashbacks of "The Anthroness". What are the criteria on having separate articles on muck characters?  --mwalimu 21:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * A significant amount of information, I would say; I don't think we've established anything more specific. I don't think a physical description necessarily counts as significant information about a character, and (not that this may be the case today) I wish people wouldn't just paste their roleplaying character description into articles... I return to the theme of if it's a quotation, mark it as such, link to where it is, rather than just dropping it into WikiFur without any indication. -- Sine 22:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)