User talk:210.49.67.89

Regarding your edit to Rose Quoll, removing material from an article without explanation will nearly always get rolled back. If you have good reason for doing so, please post an explanation in the article discussion. --mwalimu 04:14, 5 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Assumably she no longer owns the mice? (maybe they were eaten by the cats . . .) Other changes were made to the article as well and they seem reasonable, so I don't see why it should be reverted. Sometimes removing information is valid. An edit summary would have been nice. :-) -- 04:19, 5 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Perhaps I overreacted. I tend to be more skeptical of edits from an IP address than from a registered user (and I usually check the history of an IP address in deciding whether to revert, which I forgot to do in this case).  It was a close call - at least I recognized the edit as being plausible enough that I didn't block the user.  --mwalimu 05:12, 5 April 2006 (UTC)