User talk:70.24.132.223

Hi there! I noticed your recent contributions - thanks for helping out, and welcome to WikiFur! You might want to consider making an account so that you get attribution for your edits, although you're welcome to continue editing anonymously if you prefer. :-)

Let me know on my user talk page if you need any help not already provided. Again, welcome! -- 01:44, 12 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Multiple links to the same article . ..
Just to explain - the reason I removed the links is that the topic (Kelvin the Lion) had already been linked on the page, and like Wikipedia we try to keep to just one link to a specific topic per page. This avoids redundant links - after all, it's not useful if people click on two different links and find that they are at the same page - and it gets even sillier if those links are in the same paragraph. :-) -- 05:01, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)

A note re: mature material...
Most of the time, you can use one of the Censor Panda graphics to designate what level of mature material is found on an external site. If you have questions on where to find the graphics or how to add them to entries, let an admin know. Thanks! Carl Fox 03:44, 23 Oct 2005 (UTC)


 * Also, note that WikiFur is not censored for minors - it's not necessary to put huge warning labels IN CAPS over links to content that some consider inappropriate for minors. A simple statement of content deemed suitable only for adults is appropriate - it's assumed that the vast majority of visitors to the site are capable of understanding whether or not they still wish to visit the site based on that.


 * Besides, WikiFur is an encyclopedia, and as the whole concept of "rating" is an opinion, it's technically inappropriate to suggest that people should or shouldn't be doing things based on their age. I guess we could say "a significant proportion of people would consider the images on this site to be unsuitable for people below a certain age", but then it starts getting silly. The censorship pandas are a shortcut for that. :-) -- 07:56, 23 Oct 2005 (UTC)


 * WikiFur is not censored for minors. In short, the article Sasha has images which have already been blurred where it counts by myself. The full images show them more easily than the thumbnails, but even so, the normal policy stated is that Wikifur does not censor for the protection of minors. Do encyclopedias censor entries or photos inside them? No. Though if you want to give a content warning, use a Censorship Panda instead. --Markus 00:51, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)


 * Okay, one more time. WikiFur is not censored for minors.  I've edited out the line you placed in Category:Rabbit characters about the Sasha article accordingly.


 * Since this is starting to look more like a mad-on against Jeremy Bernal, if I see you doing this again, I will block this IP. Carl Fox 05:33, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Edits to Jamie Malecki and "The Jalecki Family & Friends" articles
Please stop removing the contents of the articles.

If there is a reason that you think the content of those articles should not remain on this Wiki, the proper thing to do is to post a note on the talk page explaining why you think the articles should come down. Simply removing all the content that is there is not acceptable.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask. --Dmuth 15:42, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)


 * Considering the tone of the articles, I have a strong reason to believe that this IP is owned by Jamie Malecki, and as such, considering their intention I have blanked the page about this person acording to draft policy.


 * I am not removing previous versions of this article at this time, nor will other articles be removed because of it, as they are not personal information and were submitted under the GFDL, which permits free redistribution and editing (as announced on the bottom of every edit window). We do grant some measure of privacy if that is desired, but flying into a rage about WikiFur containing content that you don't like and trying to "take your toys and going home" is not something that will achieve anything. If you don't like how WikiFur works and are not willing to go through the appropriate process of debate to change that, please, just leave it be and you'll be a lot happier. :-) -- 18:14, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

From your note on DMuth's Talk page
Dmuth?: It is I, Jamie Malecki. Convinced I am in no position overrule anything, nor be able to leave even if I tried, I am hereby granting you and GreenReaper permission to re-instate the article on yours truly. I have tried one last attempt, to post some safety note, under the Rabbit Characters category. I do hope you approve, because if not, then GOD HELP ME.<:'( Without a doubt, the Internet SHOULD NOT just be for adults only, it should be for everyone as possible, including minors. And bad influences, including explicit webmasters and their scum creations, really HURT the innocent, and it is not funny. :( I do hope I got through to you. Thank you if you would please understand and co-operate.
 * The problem with your arguments is that they contain a flaw in themselves. The internet can't be for everyone if some parts of it are censored just to protect another group of user's. The fact is you really have to go looking for these, its not like spam e-mail which is sent directly to people's inboxes and contain unsuitable content. And finally, as for hurting people, you've clearly never been to main land Europe where a lot of adverts including billboards featuring topless women posing with products. They are far more blatant than any of the largely small images used on this wiki and I don't see France or Germany collapsing in to a pool of corruption as their children's innocence is broken. Actually, forget France, they are a rather poor example at the moment. o_- -Nidonocu - talk [[Image:Trans 168.png|16px|Nidonocu]] 06:23, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)