Talk:Hibernation

Sine added tag with edit summary “.. I don't think animal costumes are necessarily furry.” Well, I think the film is an art piece of interest to furries. The main characters of Hibernation spend the vast majority of the video in costume. I didn't put “fursuits” into the article, because the kids didn't use the term fursuit. Upon re-reading the fursuit article, I think the article could describe their costumes as fursuits. --EarthFurst 02:02, 18 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Fursuits are a particular sort of costume worn / created / depicted etc. in the context of furry fandom. Animal costumes are not automatically furry. -- Sine 07:42, 18 January 2008 (UTC)


 * If the consensus is that the article is inappropriate for WikiFur, perhaps the film could be mentioned in the Costume article? --EarthFurst 22:23, 23 January 2008 (UTC)


 * If something considered "furry" can only be furry under the context of the furry fandom then you might as well remove most of the things on the media page while you're at it. --Tori Belliachi ( talk &middot; contribs ) 23:43, 23 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The relevant text from our mission statement is "if it's related in any way to furry community or culture, chances are it's worth mentioning on WikiFur." Unfortunately the videos have been removed, so it is hard to see exactly whether or not this is the case, but anthropomorphic animal costumes (or regular animal costumes portrayed such human attributes are given to the animal characters) would seem to be part of furry culture. --GreenReaper(talk) 00:44, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Status update (July 23rd 2008)
Updating the entry's appropriateness status. Keep?, Delete? Spirou 06:33, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep judging by the description, in scope. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rat (talk • contribs) 09:39, 24 July 2008 (UTC).
 * Delete, mainstream play with kids playing in costumes. Borderline at best =/ - Spirou 20:26, 30 December 2008 (UTC)