User talk:98.108.123.64

Hi there! Please be aware that "vandalism" has a specific meaning in wiki culture. Just because you disagree with an edit does not make it vandalism. Even if an editor is demonstrably wrong - which does not seem to apply here - an edit made by them in good faith is not vandalism.

In this case, not only is the edit not vandalism, but the facts included within it are referenced. It is generally a bad idea to replace a referenced fact unless you can offer equal or greater proof for your assertion. --GreenReaper(talk) 20:58, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

-

Cited sources are not assumptions. RedFox 04:06, 24 July 2010 (UTC)