Talk:Nek0gami

This page really isn't neutral. When the contreversy takes up more page space than the artist information, it's time to prune the page.


 * I think you mean "this page isn't balanced." As for "When the contreversy takes up more page space than the artist information, it's time to prune the page," nice, but faulty idea. It actually means that you need to add more about the artist Spirou 11:08, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Agreed. It would however be nice to know if there was a resolution to this, and if so, what it was. "Resolved in Neolucky's favour" doesn't cut it unless there is a more explicit reference. --GreenReaper(talk) 11:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Alright, It's just that the issue had already been settled between the two a long time ago, with the offending image removed. Basically, I feel that it's the wiki equivalent of digging up a dead horse and kicking it a few times. (Is there an expiration date on drama?)
 * It's a good question. There was a suggestion that this was announced on Nek0gami's Fur Affinity account, but I could not find this. Again, if you would like to point out any public indication that this is "settled", then we'd be glad to link to it, and that might be an indication that it's less relevant now. Personally, I'm less concerned about the tracing than the fact that he'd lied about it to start with. --GreenReaper(talk) 00:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * If I may state, the drama "ended" essentially after two half-hearted apologies from Nek0gami on his journal basically accusing his critics of petty jealousy of his amazing talent, and then a subsequent meme of users getting permission from Neolucky to trace her image and parody the drama. The aforementioned meme was completely eradicated from FA on the premise that it was "harassment" to nek0gami, despite (unlike nek0's trace) getting permission from the original artist.  This censorship essentially ended most major discussions on the matter. -24.1.207.42 00:30, 9 August 2007 (UTC)