User talk:Equivamp

never trusting content to wikiFur again
\\\\\and poof an hour writing is gone beyond my recall, no backup was the anchor for several Arcs I expected tags for formatting or veracitude (what's truth in a world of fake chars?) being intentionally not logged in but you lose all respect as a trustable knowledge base _SPACEw —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 2601:249:4080:1f20:c02e:c878:bd80:7bb8 (talk • contribs) 17:08, 19 January 2021
 * If you want to continue working on the article, please make an account, and I will restore the text to a sandbox in your user space. Or, you can use the site sandbox, though that's more for test edits and may be disrupted by other editors. While you work on it, please be sure to look into WikiFur's style guidelines and other policies to make sure you know how to get your article ready for main namespace, and look into what WikiFur is and is not. --Equivamp - talk 20:00, 19 January 2021 (EST)

Edited page and removed tags
Hi, Equivamp - I see you marked my page back in 2017 with and. I've been away quite a while, as you can tell since this is 4 years later... anyway, I have updated and I chopped out pretty much all the actual character info. I've removed the tags as well. Please let me know if this is acceptable now? Thanks. GingerM (Leave me a message) 18:01, 30 April 2021 (EDT)
 * Yes, definitely okay to remove the tags now. Soryr it took so long to get back to you. --Equivamp - talk 09:42, 21 May 2021 (EDT)

I am under attack online and need my wikifur page removed promptly. It's being used as ammo against me.
Hello. I am Charem, the one who https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Charem is written about.

This page is both severely outdated and severely unprofessional. Also, I'm currently under attack on other websites and this page and what's on it is being used as ammo against me further.

I made an edit removing most of the information and asking for page closure to immediately remove this legitimate problem, but a staff member reverted the page back to how it was before and insisted I contact a creator. So here I am.

I would appreciate my page simply being blanked/closed for the time being, until I can update it more thoroughly. I really hope this request can be responded-to quickly. Thank you.

If my identity needs to be proven, please contact me at any of my known contacts and I can verify this request.
 * I apologize for the delay in responding to your request. I see that GreenReaper has excluded the article for you. --Equivamp - talk 05:08, 31 July 2021 (EDT)

Connor J. Coyote
Hello: I requested that my page be deleted, about a month ago... and, I have not heard back on it...... and so - is it possible I can I get an answer from somebody about the status of my request?

The pages I posted are here:https://en.wikifur.com/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GreenReaper&action=edit&section=223

and here (section 5): https://en.wikifur.com/w/index.php?title=Forum:Forum:Page_Deletion_Request&t=20210613043521

(If there's something specific that I need to do, to acomplish this - or, if I need to contact a certain person - can someone let me know)? because I don't know otherwise..... thanks. :)
 * I sincerely apologize that it took so long for someone to respond to your request. I've excluded the article for you. --Equivamp - talk 05:01, 31 July 2021 (EDT)

Proposed 'spammer' tag for informal patrollers to use
I've noticed a fair number of spam articles of late so I've created a template to mark them as such, since I am not an admin (nor do I wish to become one! :D). My thought is that this gives other editors a way to quickly mark a spam article / spamming user for curators to take a look at if deletion and/or blocking is needed. The template is. I'm putting this suggestion to each of the curators; I hope this is a useful tool. If not, feel free to delete it. GingerM (Leave me a message) 19:26, 16 July 2021 (EDT)
 * I think it's a fine idea. There is also Template:SpeedyDelete. --Equivamp - talk 05:06, 31 July 2021 (EDT)