Talk:Canis Claxis

Er.. question. Can we one confirm that the person who requested the blank was this article's subject? Likewise, shouldn't there be some discussion on the apparent claims that were here previously? --Nidonocu - talk 16:22, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)


 * I was contacted by e-mail by the individual involved, so I can say with some confidence that it was indeed him. As for the claims, well, I'm pretty ambivalent on the subject. I still haven't quite figured out the best way to balance between the importance of privacy and the need to document deeds/misdeeds. This time I went for the more conservative approach, but I'm certainly not married to it. --Duncan da Husky 16:58, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)


 * Given some recent events on this guy, it sounds like this person is dangerous. I think it's getting to where the need to know and also people's safety are beginning to outweigh the importance of privacy. --Aaaamory 20:53, 5 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The moment you become a dangerous individual within the fandom, all bets are off. Favor returning article to public view, if anything as a warning to people that may encounter this individual at future venues. If the person's privacy is still a concern, strike anything that displays such, leaving the "fursona" name up (specially since he seems to be better known by it 63.204.227.202 23:02, 5 September 2006 (UTC)


 * What I've seen so far does sound like a legitimate case of assault, especially if the individual was willing to file a police report. I think we should investigate more, but if things point towards this person having done what he is accused of, the article should be brought back.  --Douglas Muth 23:19, 5 September 2006 (UTC)


 * This is a bit dated, but I have two additional pieces of info on this individual. First was the cartooney legal threat he sent me a couple of years back, over some WikiFur edits that I made.  Second was yet another allegation by an artist that his artwork was stolen by Canis Claxis.  --Douglas Muth 15:07, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

I think we should remove exclusion. This article was excluded in 2005 November. But as alluded to above ("apparent claims" and "misdeeds"), artists have reported that he has ripped them off (defrauded??) with reports from Aura Moser and Dustmeat and both of them listings others artists that had been ripped off. Additionally Aaaamory reported above (almost a year after Claxis's exclusion from WikiFur) Claxis initiated an aggressive physical confrontation. And TygerCowboy replied that "We will be banning [Claxis from Mephit Fur Meet] by real name ...". --EarthFurst (talk) 08:27, 11 April 2015 (EDT)


 * One of the above people above has reported (personally) "argumental" interactions with this individual. Commission misdemeanors are not enough for reverting Personal Exclusion, but with EarthFurst post and the user before mentioned recent clashes with Claxis, the article should be reinstated as with any other individual we have kept due to the possible/noted aggressive actions to people in the fandom. Theft or reneging on goods is just more reason to rescind exclusion. - Spirou (talk) 15:42, 11 April 2015 (EDT)