User talk:71.112.141.236

ED
Currently, 2 of our admins are minors. One other person was, but he's 18 now. Also, link me to where a lawsuit was threatened outside of the DMCA format. Also, how can you have a sentence as ridiculous as "Some in the community beleve that this rivalry may exist because wikipedia gives uncyclopedia its blessing and while it does not bless Encyclopedia Dramatica." and claim NPOV while keeping a straight face? I have no problem with you guys insulting ED, but when you try to keep an NPOV wiki and you keep it like that, you do no one a favor. 71.112.141.236 11:25, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * You're right.. It needs more fixing. -- DeVandalizer 11:40, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I've edited the article to remove the ED and Uncylopedia rivalry speculation until I can find a source... however I've left the threatened lawsuits part as DMCA notices... as I assume that cease and desist notices were sent to wikimedia along with the DMCA notice to the ISP. If I can't find any record of the cease and desist notices or any other lawsuits I'll remove the threatened lawsuits passage. Feel free to put a disputed template up... -- DeVandalizer 11:48, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Relating to Wikipedia's blessing - since Uncyclopedia is a wikicity (or whatever it's called now) the two are owned by Jimbo anyway. So of course Uncyclopedia is where Wikipedians go to get their lulz. Also, ED is much crueler than Uncyclopedia to Wikipedia. But the sentence is still useless and should be left out in my opinion. 71.112.141.236 11:47, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I think the sentence should be rephrased to indicate this new information and not deleted as it is important to explaining the "possible" rivalry. -- DeVandalizer 11:51, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * When you have two humor based wikis with many contributors, there's gonna be a rivalry. That's where the rivalry comes from. 71.112.141.236 11:54, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * That's true. I think the competing viewpoints should be noted and explained. That's NPOV in my opinion. -- DeVandalizer 11:55, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay. Then the real reason we don't like Uncyclopedia is because they're notoriously unfunny =) (only black can balance white, not gray). 71.112.141.236 12:04, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I liked your earlier explaination better, it's more logical and doesn't really rely on personal opinion. I find uncyclopedia to be funny without being offensive, unlike encyclopedia dramatica (in my opinion). I think that putting up both viewpoints would be NPOV. -- DeVandalizer 12:09, 10 July 2006 (UTC)