Talk:Felidae (novel)

Actually, he is right on the description of the book - Spirou 16:54, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
 * I reverted it because it was unexplained removal of information. Equivamptalk 16:58, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
 * Maybe you should have asked the user before abusively assuming him to be a vandal. Ô 17:05, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
 * Reverting something doesn't mean I viewed them as a vandal--it was clearly a good faith edit, but removed information. Get off my back. Equivamptalk 17:19, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
 * In Equivamp defense, most IP trolls just edit and dash, A request for an explanation would have been ignored - Spirou 17:08, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
 * If they have nothing of value to contribute, why allow IP edits? Ô 17:41, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
 * It was a generalization - Spirou 17:47, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
 * I was not only refering to vandals, but IP editors like this one who do not have the ability to back up their edits, and are mistaken for vandals/trolls. Ô 17:51, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
 * This one wasn't mistaken for either. And it's quite easy to back up their edits with a reference, just like everyone else. Equivamptalk 18:06, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
 * But he didn't, that's the point. People like him are just wasting our time and don't belong on here. Ô 18:11, 17 July 2011 (EDT)