Talk:Don't need anatomy, it's mah style!

I fail to understand why this redirect, as well as the variations Don't need anatomy, it's my style! and Don't need anatomy, it's my style‎ exist. It seems reminecent of "humorous" redirects of ED, but I am proposing that all three be marked for deletion. BlueOtter 12:52, 8 July 2011 (EDT)
 * Don't need anatomy, it's mah style was an actual article and is linked from Sparkledog. The others redirected to it. When the article was merged the logical change was to redirect to furry art instead. Are they necessary? Probably not except for the first, but redirects are cheap. (Technically cheaper than deleting them.) --GreenReaper(talk) 13:01, 8 July 2011 (EDT)