Talk:Redwall

Moved from Category talk:Redwall -- 08:21, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

SHouldn't this be at Redwall, not Category:Redwall? Almafeta 14:08, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * I was attempting to reserve Redwall for the book (i.e. book 1 of the series), and to put the information for the series as a whole into a separate entry. It is debatable whether Category:Redwall is the right place for the latter - I didn't see any problem with making a category header into an article in itself, though not everyone may agree with me on that.  Any thoughts?  mwalimu 14:12, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * The problem is that content in 'article area' of pages in the Category Namespace is not defaultly searchable. Even though I just deleted the page :P I recommend doing the following:
 * Recreate Redwall (series) and move this content to that page (including the dated list, since it provides more info than the category listing).
 * Create Redwall (book), create at least a stub entry ready for information about Book 1.
 * Turn Redwall in to a disambiguation page, linking to the two pages above.
 * Make the body text of this category page more summary like, provide a link to the Redwall (Series) article, even though its listed in the category listing.
 * This should help nicely format everything. :) --Nidonocu - talk [[Image:Trans 168.png|16px|Nidonocu]] 16:08, 13 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * Good suggestions! I'm going to go ahead with some of them, but feel free to contribute. --mwalimu 18:10, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)


 * I'd also suggest that what you wanted was a template, rather than a category. Templates are where we put stuff that gets embedded in other pages. -- Siege 13:33, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)