Talk:Thomas R. Wolfing

"Thomas r wolfing" as a search term in Google doesn't result in a single hit. I'm inclined to say we should delete this; it's simply too vague to be useful. -- Sine 17:51, 24 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I made an attempt at cleaning this one up, but admittedly there's not much to work with. It's not actively harmful, so I'm neutral on whether to delete it.  -- 18:33, 2 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Well, the recent link is good enough for me to show the artist exists. As for the rest about sightings, I'm not sure of. I'd like a source for it. Otherwise, delete it as it's not relevant to his notability as a furry artist --Rat 08:37, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

split article?
Article currently tagged with "It has been suggested that this article be split into multiple articles". Yes, I think it should be split into two articles (second article about the webcomic). --EarthFurst 03:47, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Agree. Spaz Kitty 04:01, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree. Either that or it should be further integrated into the article to just briefly discuss the comic.--Kendricks Redtail 22:45, 16 January 2007 (UTC)