Talk:Weasyl

Confirmation of (seemingly) new changes
Green, as Head Curator, I'm trying to confirm or inquire about some reversions to the formatting of the Weasel's Multimedia Archive infobox I made yesterday: Taking the FurAffinity cannon formatted infobox, I restructured the infobox to match. You made some changes afterward that I would like to confirm as you being Head Curator as these being new changes to be implemented to existing, and future articles, infoboxes (using FA's one as a example):


 * A) Removal of infobox title (Weasyl) with logo image, removal of logo image location with screenshot of site front page (new official layout?).
 * B) Additional images. Where are to be located? (i.e Fender's image) (new official layout?).
 * C) Removal of Owner/Founder entries. Normally unknown Owner/Founder placeholders are left with a "?" so future editors can add the proper data. Are we eliminating this titles? (new official layout?).
 * D) Removal of external links that normally are contained within infoboxes (Wikipedia style). A lot of the rest of the multimedia archive's articles also contain social links, not as many as Weasyl, though. Does this also affect other URL's in it with the exception of the main webpage/forum?, i.e. Wiki, Gaming site links, Development pages, IRC, Tumblr, Formspring, Music, etc (new official layout?).
 * E) These articles' genres have been labelled as Multimedia archive, are we switching them to Social art community? (new official layout?).
 * F) External links. Are Multimedia archive's (or any article) social accounts ext links being switched from the original setup:

Logo
Should we be showing the extra "simplified" logo at all? It takes up a lot of space and seems redundant with the one in the infobox. --GreenReaper(talk) 01:21, 4 August 2012 (EDT)

October 2020 rewrite
This is a major cleanup and rewrite of pretty much the entire article. I've done my best to stay objective and keep with the FBoS, but feel I lack the experience to remove the "cleanup" and "wikify" banners at the top, so I leave that for someone else to decide. Some of this is the result of original research, either from memory or from sources in my possession that cannot be made public, but I've cited more sources where possible. I hope this rewrite is considered to be an improvement. Kihari (talk) 03:29, 16 October 2020 (EDT)