Talk:Wulf Howl

I don't see the problem with this page; there is one for werelist. --98.86.133.132 14:42, 3 October 2011 (EDT)


 * How well-used is this site? How many furries are there per user? I didn't notice werelist; it and this both might be better suited to a therian wiki. Equivamptalk 14:45, 3 October 2011 (EDT)


 * The site is mainly populated by members of the otherkin/therian community. A lot of the members are also furries. --Theriwolf 14:48, 3 October 2011 (EDT)


 * Does it offer services that are geared toward furries, or have things such as a furry forum, etc.? Equivamptalk 14:52, 3 October 2011 (EDT)
 * It is similar to Werelist. It's "furry friendly" but it is more geared towards the otherkin community. --Theriwolf 14:54, 3 October 2011 (EDT)
 * Then I don't see much of a reason to keep it. :/ Equivamptalk 15:08, 3 October 2011 (EDT)
 * Please see my response to you on Werelist. It is a relevant article, unlike Therian_Temple which refers to a site that no longer exists.

Borderline
http://www.google.com/#q=site:wulfhowl.com+furry Hmm. -- Sine 17:14, 5 February 2012 (EST)

Article update (March 8, 2012)
Keep, merge, delete? - Spirou 18:50, 8 March 2012 (EST)
 * Delete as not relevant/aimed specifically to furry. Nothing links to this here on WikiFur. -- Sine 14:12, 14 March 2012 (EDT)
 * As with Werelist, I vote for keep. The guideline on notability states "It is generally sufficient to ask whether a topic is noteworthy enough that the average fur (or even a small group of furs) would find it interesting. Generally, anything which is connected to, or of interest to members of, the Furry fandom is notable for our purposes." I think this article easily passes that test by being of interest to members of the furry fandom who are also therians. Jarandhel 23:46, 18 March 2012 (EDT)

Article update (July 26, 2012)
Keep, merge, delete?. One for, one against - Spirou 23:22, 26 July 2012 (EDT)