WikiFur:Featured article candidates/Featured log/April 2006
This has good content and layout and is of historical interest as well as current relevance . . . the only thing missing is an appropriate picture or two, and perhaps some input from those other than the owner, who shouldn't have to do all the work here as well. *grin* --GreenReaper(talk) 20:11, 25 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- It's had a few more contributions, and I think it's ready. --GreenReaper(talk) 22:13, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Who doesn't like Sam? Well, quite a few people, and with good reason! Still, I'm sure some of those would at least have cause to pause after reading this article, which is probably as good a writeup as Sam could hope to get. It also manages to be informative while retaining a sense of humour, which too few articles achieve. --GreenReaper(talk) 04:24, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
An informative article on a long-running series. Controversy that shaped the name (though not for our purposes). mwalimu found a nice picture, too.
We actually got some flak for featuring this. True, it's a story about a sex slave. Should that disqualify it from the front page? WikiFur is not censored for minors. I think that extends to the front page as well. Obviously we shouldn't start going out of the way to put porn on there, but discussion of erotic material seems appropriate. It is, after all, part of the fandom. --GreenReaper(talk) 11:03, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
One of our first articles, and one of the longest and most detailed, instrumental in defining the limits of our personal information policy. Fact-checked by the person concerned, excepting the recent edits made while he was otherwise occupied. Heavily referenced. Several appropriate illustrations. It paints a sad tale, but sometimes that's life - and there's always the hope of a happy ending, despite all that has come to pass. --GreenReaper(talk) 10:50, 1 June 2006 (UTC)