Since i'm new i'm asking before I just do something: in the section of "#Foxie Channel", would it be more appropriate/acceptable if it was changed to something like "#Foxie channel description"? Waya(Talk)(C) 11:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
How come the rest of the info in my article was splotched out? I thought it was important for me to leave out some of my shortcomings just like the rest of the articles do. --Kitetsu 16:56, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Regarding placing birthplace tags, I've never seen it done before. Personally, I think it's confusing. I think we should focus on current location only when it comes to tags. -- Kendricks Redtail 05:58, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- The birthplace location category exists in many articles; I'm surprised you haven't come across it before. Feel free to bring up discussion (over in the Forum, I suppose, or maybe on Category talk:Geography, but I for one support the use. -- Sine 06:06, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
I appreciate that you put info where it belonged, and cleaned it up, but, not to sound rude, I do not understand where further cleanup is needed. If you could point it out, I would gladly fix it. Nekonaru Letao 04:52, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- I will add details on the talk page of the article. Thank you for contributing information and your willingness to tweak things! -- Sine 04:55, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Clean up attempt
Thank you for the heads up about my article needing clean up. I gave it a try, I hope things work a bit better now. I'm still rather new to wikis. Thank you again and please let me know if there is anything else I can do to make the article better. --Darc 13:30, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry for the mess, Sine. I'm Turael from the muck, and we had someone who hadn't been active for years come in and edit the page with some inaccurate information and a few things we felt were uunnecessary. The background blurb is what we use to describe the muck, it's supposed to not make a lot of sense as the muck itself is random and strange. I can replace it with something a bit more ccoherent if you'd prefer, but we're really fond of the description Sedna wrote for us. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 22.214.171.124 (talk • contribs) .
- No need to apologise! You adding information is much appreciated, and tweaking things into the usual style and format can be done later. (Tidying articles is a task I often find enjoyable.) A bit of a source for the background blurb would be good, maybe just "Written by Sedna". It can stay strange if marked as a quotation, and I think it's not too long to be included in full in the article. -- Sine 18:19, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Tena Maisha Reversion?
Uh, why did you revert my edit? Listing groups is generally done in a list form rather than paragraph, and Kovu will be the king - he just hasn't been cast yet. o.O Spaz Kitty 05:07, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- Listing a total of two groups as bullets rather than sentences seems awkward to me, and I'm not a fan of bullet-points to begin with. Also your changing to list form removed the information of that other pride being a warrior pride. Perhaps a note that Kovu is not cast as of such and such a date--I don't think jsut having the character listed when he does not (I presume) yet exist as a roleplayed character is the way to go. I reverted rather than making a manual edit because of speed and because your own edit didn't have a summary. -- Sine 17:28, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Just fixed one small grammatical error on Brendan's edit. No hard feelings. ironbladeblah 12:00 5/05/2007 Delete this after you read it.
I appreciate some of the editing. Feel free to trim up the fat. Try not to delete important information about my fursona, I wouldnt like it if the wikifur article explained something about me that is completely off base from reality. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Saphykitten (talk • contribs) .