User talk:Equivamp

From WikiFur, the furry encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
If you try to contact me I will get back with you as soon as possible.
Archives can be found here.

Category order[edit]

Category order is something I've struggled with since joining WikiFur, as I'm sure you've noticed. I'd do better remembering if I had a visual list somewhere to refer to. Since you've been the one following me around with a broom and dustpan this entire time, I figured I'd ask you if you could provide me with one. Equivamp - talk 17:29, 12 September 2014 (EDT)

I follow the example of our Category Lead, Sine:
  • [[Category:People]] always first
  • Activity-related categories ([[Category:Artists]], [[Category:Fursuiters]], constaff categories, guest-of-honour categories, etc, etc)
  • Species-related categories (generally main fursona)
  • Geographical categories (locations of significance - place of birth, current residence)
  • Time-related categories last (year of birth, year of death)--Higgs Raccoon (talk) 17:59, 12 September 2014 (EDT)
The basic idea is to lead with categories which are most likely to be of interest to furry readers, which are more specific to the subject, and which are more "important" considering this is an article about a person (i.e. being a comic artist is more important than being a fox character). Category:People is a bit odd given all that, but at least it's easy to remember. Also, having any scheme at all helps when scanning to see if something's been missed out in a particular section of the categories. --GreenReaper(talk) 22:27, 12 September 2014 (EDT)
Also congratulations on your recent promotion. Interstellar Shipping & Trading Co. (talk) 15:57, 28 October 2014 (EDT)

Stub tags[edit]

If I am adding a stub template to an article, where should I put it? Should it go beneath the main text and above the references/external links, like I did at Guardian Angel, or beneath all that, like at Alfa Fox? --Equivamp - talk 16:51, 10 May 2015 (EDT)

I'd suggest below everything, at least if you're using that template, as the external links are still part of the article. We also have {{Section-stub}}, which would go at the end of a section. --GreenReaper(talk) 16:53, 10 May 2015 (EDT)

All Finished![edit]

Hey there. Thanks for putting my page Kima in limbo for a bit while I made the major edits to it. I'm rather satisfied with what I've put for now and feel that it is done up enough to be put up.
I will probably have more edits done to it later on down the road, but I think at the moment, the page well enough suits it's purpose. Thanks a ton!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kima (talkcontribs) .

No problem! If you need any other help let me know. --Equivamp - talk 19:29, 14 May 2015 (EDT)

Ocelot[edit]

Hi, could you take a look at the two comments I've posted on Talk:Ocelot (species)? Thanks. --Babou (talk) 12:13, 30 June 2015 (EDT)

I actually did try to add a video[edit]

When it auto corrected me for me to wikify it, the embed for the video was just gone. I had to go back to actually add it

posted on the LJ[edit]

please, please, PLEASE just delete that wikifur page.

Artist collectives category[edit]

Should articles in this category have "Category:Artists" removed, as this is a sub-category of the Artists category? --Equivamp - talk 02:48, 4 August 2015 (EDT)

Thanks for asking. GreenReaper pointed out "They are not individual artists, as is implied for that category." So removing those collectives articles from Category:Artists would be appropriate.

Twitch[edit]

May I ask what the point of keeping a link to a voluntarily excluded user on a disambiguation page is? All I see it doing is cluttering disambiguation pages and distressing users that have no wish to be included in the wiki. --Rasputin (talk) 14:14, 17 August 2015 (EDT)

Page removal[edit]

Hello, a friend notified me that someone has written a page about me (complete with bizarre death theories) and I would very much appreciate if it can be removed. I simply decided some years ago that I wanted to separate myself from the fandom entirely, and while I would have no problem simply editing all of the misinformation in the article myself for correctness, the issue is I really would prefer my long-removed furry presence to be as minimal as possible. It is located at http://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Abyss-Dog If needed, I am fully able to email you or DA note you from the account(s) mentioned in the Wiki as confirmation of my identity. Thanks for the help! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Abyss (talkcontribs) .

If you still have access to your "Abyss-Dog" deviantart profile, send me a note or publish a journal. --Equivamp - talk 16:33, 30 August 2015 (EDT)
Actually, nevermind, I see the profile has been changed to match what you've told me. I'll go ahead and exclude the article. --Equivamp - talk 16:36, 30 August 2015 (EDT)
You're stellar! Thank you! :) -Abyss

Will try, i am not the greatest at using wikis, another part of the problem is i tend to forget things i was going to add, and remember after id already saved. as well as catching my own typos. Thanks for the info.

DarkXander[edit]

Will try, i am not the greatest at using wikis, another part of the problem is i tend to forget things i was going to add, and remember after id already saved. as well as catching my own typos. Thanks for the info.

Gatorbox article[edit]

Why did you undo the article rewrite of the page Gatorbox? The content currently on the page is now outdated and the majority of the people mentioned on it haven't been involved for nearly three years. Also, I ask that you please avoid using the website's former name as the original producers still own it and requested that we no longer use it for marketing/etc. Please restore it to the version that was live as per my last revision please, thanks. AndreKon (talk) 20:15, 6 April 2016 (EDT)

I think the problem was you didn't edit the original article and move it to a new name - you just created a new article and then redirected it. Equivamp attempted to fix that by restoring the old article and removing it to the new name, but this caused the "new" article to be deleted. I have restored your newer version of the article, although it may of course be edited further by others. --GreenReaper(talk) 20:29, 6 April 2016 (EDT)
Gotcha, I apologize if that edit set off any internal alarms for things like vandalism, etc. No harm intended. I guess it goes without saying, but like a lot of users here I'm not very experienced with Wiki editing, at least not this kind of Wiki. I don't mind the accessibility of the article itself or anything, but I had gotten a heads up from the former producers that they wanted me to help clean up the footprint of their original domain name and all that. I'll do a bit more poking around since there are some things marked "citation needed" now. Thanks for the revert! :) AndreKon (talk) 20:32, 6 April 2016 (EDT)
It was probably just a matter of not noticing that the copy-and-paste had in fact been a copy-and-edit. Just bear in mind that the original domain name is one fact which may be edited back in by others as a historical note. WikiFur's primary goal is to record information of interest to furry fans - we are not "your marketing", and as a WikiFur editor you should not remove information just because you feel it is in the interest of domain-holders (or you) to do so. While the owners might now use that domain name for something else, we may still wish to record the fact that the website was once there. It might, for example, be useful to access copies of the website at an earlier date at the Internet Archive - these might in turn substantiate the launch date claims, etc. --GreenReaper(talk) 20:49, 6 April 2016 (EDT)
Yeah, I actually didn't realize much more than the name had been changed. --Equivamp - talk 10:17, 8 April 2016 (EDT)

Anthrophilia[edit]

I've changed the block on Anthrophilia to a week. A year seemed excessive for what a less experienced user might consider good faith edits. Once the block expires, if this user resumes making the same sort of edits without engaging in discussion, I'd suggest doubling the length of the block. --mwalimu (talk) 14:04, 1 July 2016 (EDT)

Okay, gotcha. --Equivamp - talk 14:08, 1 July 2016 (EDT)