User talk:AlexanderGrey
From WikiFur, the furry encyclopedia.
Talk archives
|
[edit] Welcome to WikiFur:Administrators!
I thought you might want to do the next move requiring deletion yourself. You might find the extra tabs help with those pesky vandals, too. Check the link above for further information - and welcome aboard! --GreenReaper(talk) 22:18, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to the Administrators list, Tori! I think your inclusion is a very good choice by GreenReaper - I'm sure everyone here has noticed for some time the effort you've been putting into the wiki. (Though if you're spending more time I guess we'll never see another episode of "Furry Guru". Meh. ;P ) --Higgs Raccoon 22:28, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
I promised you a picture for cleaning up my tiny stub of an article... and yeah. It's totally creepy :3 Image--Sapincher 23:04, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the welcome folks! Good to be on the team! =3 -- Alexander Greytc 07:20, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Please Remove Articuno Page
I'd like the page about me to be excluded, thanks. --Articuno 09:36, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- The article has been excluded. The page still exists, however is now empty and uneditable; this is to prevent people from recreating the article. -- Alexander Greytc 15:54, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding 68.7.4.87
Hiya! I noticed that you blocked 68.7.4.87 and left a Don't Vandalize message on their talk page, in response to their edit to the ED page. However, if you look at the history for that page, they're not the one who vandalized it, they were trying to revert the vandalism of the anonymous user before them (74.53.26.178). They only caught one of the instances of the malicious edit, but the one they removed was the first one added by 74.53.26.178 (the rest were in a separate edit), so I figured that person didn't see the others.
Just thought I'd bring this to your attention; I'm not sure that 68.7.4.87 deserves a week-long block and a Don't Vandalize message. --Natasha Softpaw 22:04, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- So he did, apologies! I guess I was influenced by your edit summary (Reverting all anonymous edits) and didn't pay too much attention when bagging and tagging the folks. Been unblocked and the DV removed now. -- Alexander Greytc 06:47, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Ahh, sorry about that. It was easier to just overwrite the article with a previous version than to go through and fix each instance of vandalism (the ones that this anonymous user missed), and I wasn't really sure what to call that. --Natasha Softpaw 06:56, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Unexclusion
Hello,
I want to remove the voluntary exclusion for my article on Patrick Robbins. Thank you very much.
--Patrickrobbins 15:12, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Handled. --GreenReaper(talk) 02:18, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Name
Hi there,
In answer to your message, yes, my name does come from the supermachine seen in the Thunderbirds episode Path of Destruction. I first used it on my Wikipedia account when I came over here, as I hadn't created a fursona at that point, although I do now have a fursona, which is Mac O'Damia if you're curious. --Crablogger 05:08, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Please remove Krowy
I'm thankful of the page but i want to be Excluded, Krowy —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bloodlich (talk • contribs) 19:23, 29 August 2009.
- The page has been excluded. -- Alexander Greytc 23:47, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Request for Review
As it's impossible to leave Spirou a message on his Talk page, and requests for review are being ignored on the article's talk pages, I'll once again point out the draft page is now ready for review. —Xydexx 14:54, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
[edit] please exclude my pages
aditi and user:hooved_goddess, at least until i get some stuff cleared up. i already put the the banner thingies there, just do your admin magic to make em locked, please. thank you so much in advance.
[edit] Request For Review
Once again, the Popping draft page is ready for review. In the continued interest of not wasting everyone's time, it'd be really peachy if one of the Admins could finally resolve this long-neglected issue no later than October 24 2009, 11:59 PM EDT —Xydexx 19:35, 17 October 2009 (UTC)