Talk:RuheMaus

I removed the following text from the page, since it seemed rather inflamatory. Specifically I am referring to the aprts of equating CubCentral to pedophilia and the comments about WhiteWizard, which appear to be unfounded:

He's also very outspoken in his beliefs against child characters and such sites as CubCentral, seeing them as encuraging pedophilia itself. The Golden Lash even, for a short time, banned child characters completly. But, after being stockaded by WhiteWizard, the Lash has since returned to allowing ALL characters, even underaged ones, into the club. Dispite this, he still refuses to treat such characters with much more than cordial respect, and refuses to scene with such characters due to his beliefs.

Anyone care to take a shot at rewording it so it is a little less inflamatory? --Dmuth 16:09, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

My feeling is that it probably did take place, given this LiveJournal thread (scroll down a bit), this post and the fact that underage characters appears to be a hot-button issue over at the aforementioned LJ. It certainly seems to be the case that access to the club has been blocked on the basis of rule infringement in the past. Regardless, the event belong on The Golden Lash, though RuheMaus' underlying belief probably belongs here, if anywhere. --GreenReaper^(talk) 09:42, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Well, that works for me from the factual standpoint. Now we just have to find a way to reword it so that it is less inflamatory. Otherwise, we're just asking for trouble from people who see his assertion that (CubCental == pedophilia) and get pissed off. --Dmuth 14:32, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

I must admit it's sad when the fandom works so hard to protect the vocal minority like this, Dmuth. It's got me seriously thinking of starting an anti-cub art/sex group in furry. Because, let's face it, it really has gotten out of control. Ruhemaus 14:17, 27 December 2006 (UTC)