Talk:Redwall

Moved from Category talk:Redwall --GreenReaper^(talk) 08:21, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

---

SHouldn't this be at Redwall, not Category:Redwall? Almafeta 14:08, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I was attempting to reserve Redwall for the book (i.e. book 1 of the series), and to put the information for the series as a whole into a separate entry. It is debatable whether Category:Redwall is the right place for the latter - I didn't see any problem with making a category header into an article in itself, though not everyone may agree with me on that. Any thoughts? mwalimu 14:12, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)

The problem is that content in 'article area' of pages in the Category Namespace is not defaultly searchable. Even though I just deleted the page :P I recommend doing the following:

1. Recreate Redwall (series) and move this content to that page (including the dated list, since it provides more info than the category listing).
2. Create Redwall (book), create at least a stub entry ready for information about Book 1.
3. Turn Redwall in to a disambiguation page, linking to the two pages above.
4. Make the body text of this category page more summary like, provide a link to the Redwall (Series) article, even though its listed in the category listing.

This should help nicely format everything. :) --Nidonocu - talk 16:08, 13 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Good suggestions! I'm going to go ahead with some of them, but feel free to contribute. --mwalimu 18:10, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)

---

I'd also suggest that what you wanted was a template, rather than a category. Templates are where we put stuff that gets embedded in other pages. -- Siege 13:33, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)