Talk:Purrip

I suggest that this article should be split into three others; one for the term, and one for each of the people featured. --MKerris 13:15, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Sounds reasonable enough. There's clearly more than one concept represented here, which is always a sign of splitting. --GreenReaper^(talk) 01:34, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Wait . . . there's just one person involved, but part of it is describing the character . . . --GreenReaper^(talk) 17:05, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Hmm - I can't really understand how I managed to overlook that, but I'm glad that it has been taken care of now, nonetheless. ;) --MKerris 21:51, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I did too, at first. It wasn't that clearly described. --GreenReaper^(talk) 23:25, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)