I'm removing the People and Writers categories, since the article seems to be entirely about the story character. If the character is also the author's fursona, then the categories would be acceptable if there were also some information about the real person (whether here or in a separate article).
Not sure about the art, either. Is non-sexual frontal nudity acceptable on WikiFur? --mwalimu 16:05, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Well we already have moderately sexy frontal nudity on the dwarf fur page . . .
- I'm personally fine with it, but it'd be good to hear what other people think as well. :-) --GreenReaper(talk) 00:49, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Yark, I had not realized about the discussion section here. And um...seeing as it's like...two months and some odd days later, I'm a bit...late. But, I just wanted to say that if there are any complaints or problems, I'll be happy to either censor the...parts in question, if you will, or to simply crop the picture. Sorry if I caused any inconvenience!
Also, I may be updating this soon; if I do, I'll probably add a link to my actual user page since...Lone is I. Or me. Or whatnot. So I'm not sure if adding information about the actual Lone to my user page would warrant the readdition of the People and Writers categories - I'm assuming not, since the information about me would be on a separate page...updates as they come. --Lone(talk)
This page as well as The Snow May Fall and Seasons series were blanked by the primary subject (and main contributor) without comment (also User:Lone, but that's a user page). Instead of saying the same thing three times I'm mentioning the whole lot here.
I assume it's sort of an implicit request for personal information to be removed. I don't really know what ought to be done since although this one is primarily personal information, the other two are about a story series he is/was writing.
In any case, something should probably be done - whether it's reverting, excluding, editing to remove personal information, deleting entirely, or some combination among the different pages. Since it was blanked without any explanation it's hard to be sure what the intent was. --Riismo 02:20, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Blanked namesake pages by the user in question are assumed to be a request for exclusion. However, as I mentioned on User talk:Lone, it doesn't quite work that way for non-namesake articles. GreenReaper is the judge on that one. Spaz Kitty 02:22, 24 August 2007 (UTC)