Why is this article more empty?
I have stripped out allot of content in this article as it is about a person, mostly unsourced and VERY skewed. It doesnt represent the whole picture of the subject rathor focussing on some FA drama which may or may not be accurate.
Even if FA say Heartz and JaxHusky are the same it should be written that "FA alledged that " and not as actual fact due to the lack of reliable sources. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Leon Hunter (talk • contribs) 09:32, 20 October 2010 (UTC).
- Well sure. but the examples of her tracing were in fact actual examples, and should be kept though, right?. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 126.96.36.199 (talk • contribs) 13:22, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- I've met Heartz and Jax in person, one is a guy, one is a girl. I can't speak for who controls the FA account(s), but that would be a standard of proof we don't expect for anyone else. I have no knowledge about the other claims, I'm just trying to clear up one source of confusion. --Rat 18:43, 24 April 2011 (EDT)
- don't bother trying to blank or remove the relevant information Insane Kangaroo 05:18, 18 January 2014 (EST)
new theft rules?
"It is thought that JaxHusky is one of the first people to be banned per FurAffinitiy's new art theft rules." Which new theft rules? The Tracing and Plagiarism rules added 2010 May? --EarthFurst 03:00, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
I don't think we should accept an exclusion request when the only purpose of it is to remove apparently accurate information about their history of tracing other people's artwork. --GreenReaper(talk) 14:13, 24 April 2011 (EDT)