Why the "appropriate"-tag?
I just wanted to ask why the article is labeled as probably not appropriate. The reason in the history is: "There is overlap, not equivalence, between furry and zoo", which I don't intend to argue about, but after all Gaia Zoo seems to sell mainly dildos in animals shape along with plushies. The same kind of dildos are also found on many other websites, for example YiffyToys.de, which are not labled inappropriate. So I don't think that animal shaped dildos only apply to the zoo-scene but partially also to the furry fandom, like Sine stated, it "overlaps" on some parts, thus I think this shop is equally appropriate as is Yiffytoys.de.
I'd be willing to extend this article a little, but if it still is called inappropriate and might be subject for deletion that would be a waste of time, so, what are your opinions? Greetings, RealZero 13:37, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Article update #1 (April 17 2009)
Updating the entry's appropriateness status. Keep or delete? - Spirou 02:56, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Site is dead, and unlike GreatestJournal, I don't think it made any impact on the furry community worth mentioning. --Rat 07:12, 18 April 2009 (UTC)