The article lists the subject as having been born in 1994, but in the next section, states she was six years old in 2003. However, someone born in 1994 would have eight or nine years old in 2003. Did not change it in the article because I'm not sure which is the correct age. --Equivamp - talk 17:05, 23 July 2016 (EDT)
- FA says "My age when I wrote this is 21." That had to have been on or after March 1st, 2015, when the account was created, although it could be later. A person who was six in 2003 would not be 21 in 2015-16. Of course, it is possible to put any age on FA, and there is some incentive to inflate it. --GreenReaper(talk) 17:22, 23 July 2016 (EDT)
Age disparity resolved
I have checked up, and indeed, this was wrong. I knew my age and I knew what, but I miscalculated by counting backwards from my age now instead of going from what was already known.