From WikiFur, the furry encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

The idea that Eka is a sensible individual is absurd and opinionated, and doesn't belong in her wikipage. I can easily say that she is a ruthless, cut throat bitch that discriminates against the autistic, but that wouldn't be appropriate to put in her wikipage. That being said, she is a ruthless, cut throat bitch that discriminates against people simply because she doesn't like there personality.

I agree with removing the statements just for the fact that they are opinionated and not encyclopedia, but I would ask that you tone the language down and remember that your opinions, also, should not be featured in articles. Just a warning there. SilverserenC 22:22, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
I didn't post my opinions in the article; I said them in this discussion page. I'd appreciate you take your little warning back. --BradRepko
I never said that you put your comments in the article, I was just warning you not to, since you seem rather opinionated yourself about her. I apologize for my wording, I should have written it better. SilverserenC 05:16, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
And I said right in my little post at the top of the discussion page that I knew that it wouldn't be right to put that kind of thing in the article. [...] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BradRepko (talkcontribs) .
BradRepko, please read the policies of this site. Specifically, the rules about personal attacks. While we welcome everyone, we do have rules about acceptable behavior. Let's keep the discussions based on the articles, not the people involved. --CodyDenton 21:19, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Removed the portion of the above comment which consisted of a personal attack. --GreenReaper(talk) 04:19, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
I'm just saying, Silver seren had no right to make the point after the comma. I had already said just that, and I consider it a personal insult; so I'm removing it myself, since I'm offended by it.
I have reverted your editing of my comment. Nothing I said was a personal attack. SilverserenC 00:50, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
I found it insulting my intelligence. You took what I just said, said it back to me, and told me it was a warning. You better believe that was an insult. You were being a prick and I took extreme offense to it. You've said you are sorry you said it, but you've never admitted or apologized for warning me not to do something I had just said wouldn't be okay to do. You either didn't bother reading my full post and are an idiot; or are insinuating that I am so stupid that I was going to do something that I had just said I wouldn't, which would make you an asshole. Either way, I'm not trying to insult you, you either made an idiot or an asshole of yourself on my first day here. Which is it, Silver? BradRepko 06:06, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Brad, if you weren't here to give your opinion, why did you bother to post it at all? What did you expect people to think you were here for, or to say in response? Moreover, you continue to call Silver seren "stupid" over a perceived slight. Please, take the rancor towards others elsewhere. --GreenReaper(talk) 00:06, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Unlike that unconfirmed tripe that had been on there about Eka before, I know from personal experience my claims. I didn't put in on the page because I don't have any links to prive such accusations, but that doesn't change the fact that Eka is a discriminating bitch who selects people she doesn't like to humiliate and purge from her community. There just isn't any proof. She also desecrates the dead. (also removed a portion of a comment that was a personal attack)BradRepko 04:38, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Two questions here. (1) Why are you going back and editing someone else's comments? That's sort of frowned upon on a talk page without a really good reason. You removed a section of Silver Seren's post that asked you to tone down the language and to remember that opinions are not encyclopedic material. That was not a "personal attack," it was a request that you abide by the rules of the site. And he later apologized for the way it was worded.(2) What do you hope to gain by coming here and calling someone a "bitch" who "desecrates the dead?" To borrow your own words, there just isn't any proof. So those accusations (especially the latter one) do not really do much to strengthen your case, nor to show a willingness to discuss this in a calm and neutral manner. Please abide by the rules and values of this community if you wish to post here. --CodyDenton 07:13, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
You know, it's funny you'd choose to use the "bitch who desecrates the dead" portion in your example, because that is something that can be proven. LOL! --BradRepko 01:19, 30 October 2010 (UTC)