No, actually, as discussed on the article Fox (disambiguation), the formatting was to conform to the Wikipedia formatting, as per questions and suggestions and my pints put forward, backed, not rejected, on Talk:Fox. I asks to make sure when i was suggested to work with the articles offline. Since no contrary opinions were offered last year, that's the way I been recreating the 31 name disambiguations offline (including the re-inclusion of see also's, suggested, and a nod from Colleague mwalimu.
That's why the questions posted way back when. To make sure I got some consensus about proposal changes, in the same way I agreed to abide for offline editing, and future edits to fall in line with your suggestion, Equivamp, and Greenreaper's suggestion for the "XXXX" to "XXXX (disambiguation)" name change.
Questions asked then, so this formatting doesn't come up as a surprise now - Spirou 20:05, 24 January 2013 (EST)