Talk:DeviantART

It seems pretty clear that Tim Frommeyer has a personal grievance here. The deviantART article is fairly widely linked, so it would be worth some effort to resolve this. --Sebkha^(talk) 13:13, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)

You know, that edit has so little to do with furry, I went ahead and reverted back to GreenReaper's prior edit. If someone can note the furry content, we can move on from there. Carl Fox 13:31, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I did a little bit of due diligence on Tim in the meantime. He's a german teen with promise as a Flash animator, but doesn't appear to produce any specifically furry works. It seems unlikely he'll be back to argue his side of the issue. --Sebkha^(talk) 13:50, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)

"Furry orientated sexuality" covers a _great_ deal more than zoophilia/bestiality. This sentence needs to be edited - is DA's policy particularly strict on _furry_ porn, as opposed to zoo material? The article should make it clear, either way. Tevildo 14:37, 1 Oct 2005 (UTC)

-- In one case, several reports of a picture of nude women seemingly using millipede-like creatures (which could be considered beastiality) went ignored, so there may be a bias there.

Can DeviantArt really be called "furry-friendly"? Anthro and anime art are not recognized as "top daily favourites", see here: Anime and Anthro: Bye Bye from DTF's That may indicate that the admins there see furries as a nuisance .... --Unci 13:39, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Well that article was from the co-founder jark. Though there's this article that was made in august last year that was made by techgnotic When Being Human Just Is'nt enough basically talks about anthro art. though there's a lot of conflicting arguments to the side. --Tridragon 09:14, 14 May 2012 (EDT)