From WikiFur, the furry encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

Maybe a move to the transformation article would be more suitable? Most conjoinment in furry occurs in transformation stories. Also, I think I've provided enough unique examples, such as the fursuits and the furry literature and even given art examples, that there's sufficient furry context. We need to look at something like conjoinment and recognize that it has a general meaning, but in Wikifur, we ask the question, how is it displayed within furry? Other sources aren't going to talk about the furry side of things. That's what WikiFur is for.- Ronin

Status update (August 31st 2007)[edit]

Updating the entry's appropriateness status. Keep?, Delete? Spirou 06:04, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

I think that it's probably worth keeping, since there are links to artists and examples made of fursuits, so it IS relevant to furry. I'm gonna go with keep here.--Kendricks Redtail 11:20, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Agreed, keep. It does assert its relevance to furry. --Rat 17:27, 1 September 2007 (UTC)