I don't see this meeting the Speedy Deletion qualifications
I'm not sure this qualifies for speedy deletion.
" 1. An image which is a redundant (all pixels the same or scaled-down) copy of something else on WikiFur and as long as all inward links have been changed to the image being retained."
'Doesn't seem to fit the bill.'
2. The image is obscene, or uploaded only for shock value. This does not necessarily include 'pornographic' images - such images might be relevant to an article about an adult subject, though their use is dubious and may well be voted on in an Image for Deletion request.
'Also doesn't seem to fit the bill. It seems to be an attempt to document a threat or plan to commit an attack on wikifur that I perceive is a warning from someone who witnessed the threat/documented plan, not someone who themselves is planning to make the attack.'
3. A corrupt or empty image.
'Doesn't fit the bill here, either.'
4. An image which is only used in an article that is also marked for speedy deletion.
'The image was used on Green's talk page which I highly doubt is going to be speedily deleted.' --Chibiabos 21:23, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- It was not used on GR's talk page when I made that nomination. I just withdrew it. --Douglas Muth 21:30, 28 August 2006 (UTC)