Is this an appropriate category to have? To me, it will be a personal attack on the subject of any article that does belong here, and be an open invitation for all of COTI to create their own page. Then again, GreenReaper probably would support the latter... nn; Almafeta 12:19, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)
COTI-ites or COTI-ietes ?
WikiFur currently has two categories (1) COTI-ites (lists 5 names) and (2) COTI-ietes (is blank). I assume the second is a typo of the first. Any objections to me changing "COTI-ietes" to "COTI-ites"?
- Hmm - there doesn't seem to exist a category named 'COTI-ietes', though - I can't find it in the full category list at any rate. --MKerris 21:48, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Ahh, never mind that - I see that you was speaking of merely a link to the 'COTI-ietes' category. Thanks for spotting/correcting it. :) --MKerris 22:04, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
I like cotards, myself. --Rootdown 21:53, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)
This looks like a category which would be much more appropriate for user space rather than for main articles. -- Sine 06:04, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Bumping this. Vote to delete. Too many unused categories that have no meaningful relevance. This is one of them. --CodyDenton 11:49, 11 February 2011 (UTC)